Hermitage Healthcare (the)
383 Mill Street, Worcester, MA 01602 · For profit - Corporation · 101 certified beds · (508) 791-8131 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (21% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- a high number of inspection citations overall (33) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 1 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 1 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 13.2% | 16.4% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.0% | 5.1% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 2.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 3.3% | 1.8% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 22.4% | 15.5% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.5% | 3.4% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 12.8% | 15.4% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 25.0% | 19.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 94.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 1.2% | 4.2% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 29.6% | 21.2% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 31.1% | 21.4% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.9% | 1.4% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 70.6% | 77.7% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 27.5% | 25.7% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 11.0% | 11.9% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 3.41 | 1.88 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.31 | 1.50 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
40.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 41 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 12.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 25 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.16 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 14% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 28% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 40.1%CMS range 28.4–57.3 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.8%CMS range 7.4–17.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 12.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 12.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 12.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 97.2% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 2.8% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.8% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.5%CMS range 4.3–13.4 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.74 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 101 beds and averages 88.6 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.74 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.53 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.20 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.37 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.89 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.66 to 0.23 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 21% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
33 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 23 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-20 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — patternAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and records reviewed, the facility failed to provide effective administration related to necessary care and services for one Resident (#4), out of a total sample of 20 residents when the facility reviewed Resident #4's clinical status of a laryngectomy (surgical procedure in which one's voice box is removed, separating one's airway from the mouth, nose, and esophagus, resulting in the ability to breathe only through an opening in the front of the neck) tube prior to the Resident's admission to the facility and accepted and admitted Resident #4, with a laryngeal tube in place, to the facility.Specifically, the facility administration failed to:-Develop policies and procedures relative to necessary care and services for residents with laryngeal tubes, placing the Resident at risk for ineffective respiratory care.-Identify staff competency levels for providing necessary care to residents with laryngeal tubes, placing the Resident at risk for ineffective respiratory care and airway…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-20 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — patternConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews, the facility failed to update the Facility Assessment when the facility had a change in resident population not already identified in the Facility Assessment, increasing the risk for inadequate medical care.Specifically, the facility failed to re-evaluate its resident population and identify the resources needed to provide necessary care and services when Resident #4:-was admitted to the facility with a laryngectomy (surgical procedure in which one's voice box [larynx] is removed, separating one's airway from their mouth, nose, and esophagus, allowing for breathing to occur only through and opening in the front of the neck) tube.-required staff assistance for care of his/her laryngectomy tube.-required specialized equipment to manage his/her airway in the event of cardiopulmonary arrest. Findings include:Resident #4 was admitted to the facility in July 2024 with diagnoses including Dementia and with a laryngectomy tube. Review of Resident #4's Hospital Discharge summary,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-20 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one Resident (#10) out of a total sample of 20 residents was treated with respect and dignity during dining experiences when the Resident was identified as being dependent on staff assistance for meals. Specifically, for Resident #10, the facility failed to:-provide the Resident with appropriate eating utensils, when the Resident was observed utilizing a comb for eating during a lunch meal.-provide the Resident with the required supervision and intervene as needed when the Resident was left alone in his/her bedroom during breakfast and lunch meals and was observed spilling food items on their person, the meal tray, the tray table and the floor while trying to eat during the meals. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Resident Rights, revised January 2024 included but was not limited the following: -Federal and State laws guarantee certain basic rights to all residents of this facility. These rights include .the residents right to dignity. Resident #10 was admitted to the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-20 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodations by ensuring appropriate access to the call system for one Resident (#8) out of a total sample size of 20 residents.Specifically, for Resident #8, the facility staff failed to place the call system within reach for the individualized use of the Resident, placing him/her at risk for unmet needs. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Answering Call Lights, established April 2018, and last revised January 2024, indicated: >The purpose of this procedure is to respond to the resident’s requests and needs. -Explain the call light to the new resident as needed. -Demonstrate the use of the call light as needed. -When the resident is in bed, provide the call light within easy reach of the resident. -Report all defective call lights to the nurse promptly. -Answer the resident’s call as soon as possible. Resident #8 was admitted to the facility in April 2021 with diagnoses including history of falling, muscle weakness, anxiety disorder and disorders of the muscle.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-20 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide care and services according to accepted standards of clinical practice for two Resident's (#7 and #1) out of a total sample of 20 residents.Specifically, the facility failed to:1.For Resident #7, implement recommendations from the Wound Consultant for the use of a wound cleansing solution for the treatment of a right heel arterial ulcer.2.For Resident #1, ensure that Physician's orders relative to the correct size of the Resident's indwelling urinary catheter were obtained when the urinary catheter size was changed during a Urology Consult visit. Findings include: 1.Review of the facility policy titled Dressing, Dry/Clean, established 4/2018, and last revised 11/2024, indicated: >The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for the application of dry, clean dressings. -Verify that there is a physician’s order for this procedure. -Review the resident’s current orders, and diagnoses to determine if there are special…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide assistance while eating for one Resident (#10) out of a total sample of 20 residents, when the Resident was identified to be dependent on staff assistance to eat. Specifically, the facility failed to provide constant supervision and one-person assistance while eating when Resident #10 was known to lack the ability to initiate or sequence tasks and had impaired vision. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Activities of Daily Living (ADLs)-Supporting, last revised 11/2024 included but was not limited to the following: -Resident's who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary for ADLs. -Appropriate care and services will be provided .and in accordance with the resident's plan of care. Including: Dining (meals and snacks). Resident #10 was admitted to the facility in February 2017 with diagnoses including Unspecified Dementia - severe with anxiety and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-20 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (#22) out of a total sample of 21 residents, received an assistive device to maintain his/her hearing abilities.Specifically, the facility failed to follow-up with the audiology office to ensure Resident #22 received a hearing aid when the Resident had sensorineural hearing loss and a hearing aid was recommended for the Resident by the Audiologist, increasing the Resident's risk for hearing difficulties. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Ancillary Physician Services, dated April 2018 and revised March 2025, indicated the following:-Routine . audiology services are available to meet the residents' health needs.- . audiologist will be available to provide follow-up care per resident's request.-Social services or nursing representatives will assist residents with appointments . Resident #22 was admitted to the facility in October 2022 with diagnoses including left ear hearing loss. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-20 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that nursing staff possessed the competencies required to meet the needs of one Resident (#4) of one applicable resident with a laryngectomy (surgical procedure in which one's voice box [larynx] is removed, separating one's airway from their mouth, nose, and esophagus, allowing for breathing to occur only through and opening in the front of the neck and omitting the mouth and nose as a means of receiving oxygenation and ventilation) tube, out of a total sample of 20 residents.Specifically, for Resident #4, the facility failed to evaluate competencies that demonstrated the knowledge and skills required by the direct care nursing staff to implement proper care and services of the Resident's laryngectomy tube. Findings include: Review of the National Library of Medicine abstract titled Standardized Nurse Training Strategies to Improve Knowledge and Self-Efficacy with Tracheostomy and Laryngectomy Care published August 2016 indicated:-appropriate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-20 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a medication administration error rate of less than five percent (%) for two Residents (#14 and #54), out of two applicable residents, out of 27 medication pass opportunities. The medication error rate was calculated to be 11%. Specifically, 1. For Resident #14, the Resident was administered the wrong medication doses when one puff of Budesonide-Formoterol Fumarate (an inhaled combination medication used to manage asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) 160-4.5 micrograms per actuation (mcg/act) Inhalation and one puff of Spiriva Respimat (an inhaled medication used to manage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) 1.25 mcg/act Inhalation were administered, and two puffs of Budesonide-Formoterol Fumarate 160-4.5 mcg/act and two puffs of Spiriva Respimat 1.25 mcg/act Inhalation were ordered by the Physician.2. For Resident #54, the Resident was administered the wrong dose of Omeprazole Delayed Release (DR) when 20 milligrams (mg) of Omeprazole DR was administered, and 40 mg of Omeprazole DR…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-20 · tag F0942 — isolatedEnsure that staff members are educated on resident rights and facility responsibilities to properly care for its residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all staff received annual training on Resident's Rights. Specifically, 35 facility staff members were not in compliance for completion of their mandatory annual Resident's Rights education as of 8/20/25 evidenced by the Annual All Employee Course Completion History Report. Findings include: During an interview on 8/19/25 at 8:48 A.M., the Staff Development Coordinator (SDC) said he was responsible for all education to all facility staff employed by the facility. The SDC said that most mandatory education is available to the employees through a computerized education platform, or he could develop education if/when needed. The SDC said that Resident Rights education should be done upon hire and annually by all staff. The SDC said that he did not have a tracking system in place to monitor staff members that were not up to date with mandatory education. During an interview on 8/19/25 at 12:00 P.M., the Director of Nurses (DON) said that he did have a way to track education compliance for staff members in the facility.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 23 citations
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-04 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and policy review the facility failed to maintain a clean and homelike environment for one Resident (#81) on one unit out of three units observed. Specifically, for Resident #81 who resided on the Sunburst Unit the facility failed to ensure that the Resident's enteral tube feeding (nutritional supplement through a tube to the stomach) equipment consisting of a pump and a pole was maintained in a clean manner. Findings include: Review of the facility policy for Cleaning and Disinfection of Environmental Surfaces, last revised 4/2018, indicated the following: -semi-critical items consist of items that come in contact with mucous membranes or non-intact skin. Such devices should be free from all microorganisms . -housekeeping surfaces will be cleaned on a regular basis, when spills occur and when the surfaces are visibly soiled -environmental surfaces will be disinfected (or cleaned) on a regular basis (e.g., daily, three times per week) and when surfaces are visibly soiled. On 5/30/24 at 11:13 A.M., the surveyor observed multiple stains and splattered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-04 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and records reviewed, the facility failed to arrange services according to professional standards of practice for one Resident (#42) out of a total sample of 20 residents. Specifically, facility staff failed to arrange services with the Hand Surgeon for Resident #42 to undergo surgery when the Hand Surgeon diagnosed the Resident with Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS: occurs when the median nerve, which runs from your forearm, through your wrist, into the palm of your hand, becomes pressed or squeezed at the wrist) and a trigger finger (condition in which fingers remain in a bent position due to inflammation of tendons that bend the fingers) and recommended surgical intervention. Findings include: Review of the American Society for Surgery of the Hand's document titled Trigger Finger, dated 2020, indicated the following relative to a trigger finger: - Trigger finger is a common and treatable problem. - Trigger finger is diagnosed through review of one's history, symptoms, and by physical exam. - Risk factors for trigger finger include Diabetes. - Trigger…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-04 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, policy and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who are trauma survivors receive culturally competent and trauma-informed care for one Resident (#86) out of a total sample of 20 residents. Specifically, the facility staff failed to develop and implement a trauma informed care plan for Resident #86's past history of trauma and/or triggers which may cause re-traumatization. Findings include: Review of the facility policy for Trauma Informed Care last revised October 2019, indicated: -to implement universal screening of residents for trauma -as part of the comprehensive assessment, identify history of trauma or interpersonal violence when such information is provided to the facility. Resident #86 was admitted to the facility in February 2024 with diagnoses including unspecified adult maltreatment (used for confirmed cases of adult maltreatment when clinical information is unknown or not available about a particular condition. It falls under the range of injury, poisoning,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-04 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and records reviewed, the facility failed to provide two Residents (#49 and #48), who were diagnosed with Dementia, with appropriate treatment to attain or maintain their highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being, out of a total sample of 20 residents. Specifically, facility staff failed to adequately monitor Resident #48's verbal behaviors and implement effective behavior interventions to prevent Resident #48 from directing verbal behaviors towards Resident #49 when Resident #49 was receiving personal care from facility staff, which resulted in an undignified experience for both Residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy, titled Resident Rights, dated November 2017 and last revised January 2024, indicated Federal and State laws guarantee certain basic rights to all residents of the facility, including the resident's right to: - a dignified existence. - be treated with respect, kindness, and dignity . a. Resident #49 was admitted to the facility in October 2017 with diagnoses including: left knee pain, left elbow…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-01-19 · tag F0868 — widespreadHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility and its staff failed to ensure that the required members were included in the Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee quarterly meetings. Specifically, there was no evidence that the Medical Director attended any of the quarterly QAPI meetings in 2022. Findings include: Review of the attendance sheets for the quarterly QAPI meetings showed no evidence that the Medical Director or his/her designee participated in the QAPI meetings held on the following dates: -2/9/22 -4/14/22 -7/18/22 -10/21/22 During an interview on 1/19/23 at 3:56 P.M., the Administrator said that the Medical Director had not participated in any quarterly QAPI meetings in 2022, but that he should have as required.
- Potential for harm · F2023-01-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and policy review, the facility and its staff failed to: 1) ensure staff at least annually, reviewed and revised the infection control policies, 2) have an implemented system for identifying, investigating, reporting, controlling, and preventing infections and communicable diseases for all residents, staff, and visitors, and 3) use the appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) during an outbreak of COVID-19 to stop the spread of infection transmission. Findings include: 1) The facility failed to annually review and/or revise the infection control policies. During a review of several infection control policies titled: -Isolation - Categories of Transmission Based Precaution, last revised July 2021 -Covid Testing, last revised July 2021 -Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Prevention and Control, last Revised May 2020 -Interim Infection Prevention for COVID-19, revised May 2020 there was no evidence that they were reviewed annually. During an interview on 1/19/23 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-01-19 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespreadImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility and its staff failed to ensure an Antibiotic Stewardship Program was in place to monitor antibiotic use. Findings include: Review of the Antibiotic Stewardship Program Line Listing indicated that there were no completed infection control tracking logs for December 2022 and January 2023. During an interview on 1/19/23 at 2:01 P.M., the Regional Clinical Nurse said that the line listing used to track infections and antibiotic use had not been done for December 2022 and January 2023.
- Potential for harm · F2023-01-19 · tag F0882 — widespreadDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility and its staff failed to designate a qualified person to serve as the Infection Preventionist (IP), as required. Review of the key personnel listing indicated that there was no current IP at the facility. During an interview on 1/18/23 at 3:45 P.M., the Regional Clinical Nurse said that that she had been designated to oversee the IP program at the facility as of 1/17/23. She further stated prior to that, the facility did not have a designated qualified person who had undergone specialized training in infection control to oversee the IP program as required.
- Potential for harm · F2023-01-19 · tag F0885 — failed to notify residents/families about COVID-19 — widespreadReport COVID19 data to residents and families.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on document review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that its staff notified Residents, families, and/or Resident Representatives of COVID-19 positive staff and resident cases in the facility by 5:00 P.M., the next calendar day during the recent COVID-19 outbreak in January 2023, as required. Findings include: Review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Interim Final Rule Updating Requirements for Notification of Confirmed or Suspected COVID-19 cases of Residents and staff in nursing homes, Reference: QSO-20-29-NH dated May 6, 2022, indicated: -(3) Inform residents, their representatives, and families of those residing in facilities by 5 P.M., the next calendar day following the occurrence of either a single confirmed infection of COVID-19, or three or more residents or staff with new-onset of respiratory symptoms occurring within 72 hours of each other . Review of the facility's Confirmed Positive Staff list, dated 1/17/2023, indicated: three positive COVID-19 cases among staff from 1/13/23-1/17/2023. Review of the Hermitage Healthcare Daily Census,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-01-19 · tag F0886 — failed to test for COVID-19 as required — widespreadPerform COVID19 testing on residents and staff.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility and its staff failed to ensure weekly surveillance testing for COVID-19 was implemented for staff and also failed to conduct COVID-19 outbreak testing on staff and residents in a timely manner. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1) ensure weekly COVID-19 surveillance testing was done for three staff (Dietary staff #1, CNA#1, and CNA#5) out of a sample of three staff, 2) ensure COVID-19 outbreak testing was done every 48 hours after a COVID positive staff or resident was identified, for two staff (CNA #2 and CNA #5), out of three sampled staff, and 3) ensure COVID-19 outbreak testing was done every 48 hours after a COVID-19 positive staff or resident was identified, for two Residents (#14 and #41) out of a sample of three Residents, to stop the spread of infection. Findings include: Review of the Massachusetts Department of Public Health guidance titled Updates to Long-Term Care Surveillance Testing dated 12/1/22 indicated the following: - All Long-Term Care (LTC) staff who are up to date with COVID-19 vaccines must conduct weekly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-01-19 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure that its staff provided an ongoing program of group and independent activities designed to meet the interests and support the well-being for five Residents (#6, #81, #1, #14, and #27) out of a total sample of 20 residents. Specifically, the facility staff failed to provide independent activities for Residents #6, #81, #1, #14, and #27, and group activities on the Sunburst unit. Findings include: 1) Resident #6 was admitted to the facility in October 2019 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's (a progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions), Major Depression (a mental health disorder characterized by persistently depressed mood or loss of interest in activities, causing a significant impairment in daily life), and cognitive communication deficit (difficulty with thinking and how someone uses language). Review of the Care Plan Meeting notes dated 1/11/22 and 4/14/22 indicated that Resident #6 enjoyed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-01-19 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC's) Pneumococcal and Influenza Vaccine guidance, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that its staff provided the appropriate Pneumococcal and Influenza vaccines for four Residents (#17, #22, #41 and #89) out of a sample of five applicable residents, putting them at risk for developing facility acquired Pneumonia and Influenza. Findings include: Review of the CDC's Pneumococcal Vaccine Timing for Adults, dated 4/1/22, indicated the following: CDC recommends Pneumococcal vaccination for the following: -Adults 19 through [AGE] years old with no underlying medical conditions- vaccine is not recommended. -Adults 19 through [AGE] years old with certain underlying medical conditions or other risk factors including: Diabetes Mellitus, Congenital or Acquired Immunodeficiencies, Chronic heart/liver/lung disease . administer 1 dose of PCV20, or 1 dose of PCV 15 followed by 1 dose of PPSV23 at least one year later. -For adults 65 years or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-01-19 · tag F0887 — patternEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on policy review, record review, and interview, the facility and its staff failed to provide COVID-19 vaccines as indicated by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for three Residents (#22, #41 and #89), out of a sample of five applicable Residents. Specifically, facility staff failed to ensure: 1) that Resident #22 received the COVID-19 vaccinations in sequence and with a signed consent, 2) that Resident's #41 and #89 received COVID-19 vaccinations in the proper sequence. Findings include: Review of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance titled, Stay Up to Date with your COVID-19 Vaccines Including Boosters, updated September 2022, indicated but was not limited to the following: When are you up to date (UTD)? -You are up to date with your COVID-19 vaccines if you have completed a COVID-19 vaccine primary series and received the most recent booster recommended for you by the CDC. - If you have completed your primary series-but are not yet eligible for a booster-you are also considered up to date. On 1/19/23, the surveyor reviewed the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that its staff implemented the plan of care for two Residents (#4, #58), out of a total sample of 20 residents. Specifically, the facility staff: 1) failed to notify the Physician for one Resident (#1) when the Resident's blood sugar measurement was greater than 250 mg/dl (milligrams per deciliter), and 2) failed to implement the use of multipodus boots (used to aid in the treatment of injuries to the foot and ankle including foot drop and pressure ulcers) for one Resident (#58). Findings include: 1) Resident #4 was admitted to the facility in August of 2010 with a diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar). Review of the current Physician orders, dated January 2023, indicated the following order initiated on 4/20/2021: -Check FSBS (finger stick blood sugar) three times daily prior to meals .please call MD (Medical Doctor) if BS (blood sugar measurement) is greater than 250 mg/dl. Review of the December 2022 Medication Administration…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-19 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, policy review, and interview the facility failed to ensure that its staff included one Resident (#74) out of a total sample of 20 residents in the care planning process. Specifically, the facility failed to provide evidence that Resident #74 and the Resident's Representative had been invited to and participated in their care plan meetings. Findings include: Review of the facility policy for Care Plans, last revised November 2017, indicated: -the Resident will be informed of his/her right to participate in his/her treatment. -an explanation will be included in a Resident's medical record if the participation of the Resident .is determined not to be practicable. -the care planning process will facilitate Resident and/or Representative involvement. Resident #74 was admitted to the facility in September 2020. During an interview on 1/17/23 at 10:26 A.M., Resident #74 said that he/she had not been involved in his/her care planning meetings recently. Review of the medical record did not indicate that either the Resident or their Representative were invited to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-19 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility and its staff failed to ensure one Resident (#48) received the care and services, based on their assessment, to maintain an acceptable nutritional status. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1) ensure a nutritional supplement was accepted and administered as ordered, 2) revise the care plan to include new interventions to arrest weight loss, and 3) provide the required assistance at meal times. Findings include: Resident #48 was admitted to the facility in April 2022 with a diagnosis of unspecified Dementia. 1) The facility staff failed to ensure documentation of the acceptance/refusal and intake amount, of a nutritional supplement to allow for evaluation of the supplemnt's effectiveness. Review of a Nutrition Therapy Assessment, dated 7/28/22, indicated the Resident's meal intake was 50-100% with most being 75% or more. Weight was stable at 114-118 pounds (lbs.) for the last three months. Review of a Nutrition Therapy Assessment, dated 8/25/22, indicated the Resident had a decline with a weight loss trend of 4 lbs.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-19 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and policy review the facility failed to ensure that its staff provided care and services consistent with professional standards for Resident (#60), who required renal dialysis (a procedure to remove waste products and excess fluid from the body when the kidneys stop working properly), for one out of a total sample of 20 residents. Specifically, the facility staff failed to ensure complete and accurate communication and documentation with the dialysis facility as required. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) Outpatient Dialysis Services Agreement, dated March 1, 2021, indicated the following: -both parties shall ensure that there is documented evidence of collaboration of care and communication between the nursing facility and End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) Dialysis Unit. Resident #60 was admitted to the facility in December 2022 with diagnoses including ESRD (End Stage Renal Disease - Renal/Kidney failure). Review of the signed Physician orders dated January 2023, indicated the following: -…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-19 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on policy review, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that its staff provided pharmaceutical services for two Residents (#41 and #14) out of a sample of 20 residents. Specifically, the facility staff failed to ensure: 1) Resident #41 had a diagnosis that indicated the need for an anti-psychotic medication (Abilify), and 2) that Resident #14 had monthly pharmacy reviews completed as required. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Psychoactive Medication, dated, April 2018 indicated the following: -Obtain a Physician's order (a Physician's order and an appropriate diagnosis are required for all psychotropic medications.) -A Consultant Pharmacist reviews the appropriateness of the psychotropic medication order as part of each drug regimen review and monitors for: appropriateness of psychotropic administration based on diagnoses . 1) Resident #41 was admitted to the facility in October 2022, with diagnoses including Depression and anxiety disorder. Review of the January 2023, Physician's Order Summary Report indicated the following orders…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-19 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, record review, and policy review the facility and its staff failed to ensure that each Resident's drug regimen was free of unnecessary psychotropic medications. Specifically, the facility staff failed to ensure anti-psychotic psychotropic consents were obtained for two Residents (#22 and #41's), out of a total sample of 20 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Psychoactive Medication, dated 4/2018, indicated the following: -An informed consent from the resident (or legally authorized individual in the case of resident incompetence) is required for administrations of psychotropic medication. 1) Resident #22 was admitted to the facility in October 2022 with diagnoses including Schizophrenia and Depression. Review of the Physician Order Summary Report dated January 2023, indicated the following orders for psychotropic medication: Abilify 15mg one tablet by mouth - one time a day (daily). Review of Resident #22's MAR, dated January 2023, indicated: Abilify 15mg was administered as ordered. During an interview and record review on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-19 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility and its staff failed to ensure laboratory services were provided for one Resident (#14), out of a sample of 20 residents. Specifically, the facility staff failed to ensure weekly laboratory tests were obtained, as ordered by the Physician, while the Resident was being treated for an infection. Findings include: Resident #14 was admitted to the facility in August 2022. Review of the January 2023 Physician's orders indicated: -an order (initiated 12/13/22) to administer Doxycycline Monohydrate Capsule (antibiotic) 100 milligrams (mg) by mouth every 12 hours for Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA-an infection caused by a bacteria that is resistant to many antibiotics) and Osteomyelitis (bone infection) -administer for 6-12 weeks. Review of the Physician's order, dated 12/15/22, indicated to check the following laboratory tests weekly on Mondays due to diagnoses of MRSA and Osteomyelitis: -Complete Blood Count with differential (CBC-used to help diagnose and monitor different conditions, including infections), -Basal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, policy review, and interview, the facility and its staff failed to adhere to food safety requirements to prevent foodborne illnesses. Specifically, the facility staff failed to: 1) perform hand hygiene for sanitary distribution of food, and 2) store food in accordance with professional standards in the kitchenette located on the Sunburst Unit. Findings include: 1) Review of the Department of Public Health (DPH) Memorandum for Comprehensive Personal Protective Equipment Guidance, dated January 21, 2022, indicated that health care personnel should perform hand hygiene prior to donning (putting on) and after doffing (removing) gloves. During an observation on 1/18/23 at 11:26 A.M., during the lunch meal preparation, the surveyor observed the Food Service Director (FSD) distributing food for service. The FSD was observed removing her gloves after taking an item from the oven and putting on a new pair of disposable gloves. The FSD did not perform hand hygiene as required between taking off the old gloves and putting on a new pair of gloves. During an interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2025-08-20 · tag F0628 — patternProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide written documentation related to transfer discharge notices, and bed-hold policy notice upon hospitalizations, and the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman notification for four Residents (#2, #3, #1 and #89) out of a total sample of 20 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: for Resident #2, provide evidence of written documentation relative to hospital transfer notice, bed-hold policy notification upon hospitalization, and Ombudsman notification. for Resident #3, provide evidence of written documentation relative to hospital transfer notice, bed-hold policy notification upon hospitalization and Ombudsman notification.for Resident #1, provide evidence of Ombudsman notification upon hospitalization.for Resident #89, provide evidence of written documentation relative to hospital transfer notice, bed-hold policy notification upon hospitalization and Ombudsman notification. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Transfer or Discharge Notice, established 4/2018, and revised 11/2024,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2025-08-20 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to accurately code a Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment for one Resident (#8), out of a total sample of 20 residents.Specifically, the facility failed to:-For Resident #8, accurately code for the use of corrective lenses (eyeglasses) during the MDS observation period. Findings include:Review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual version 1.19.1 dated October 2024, indicated the following:Hearing, Speech and Vision: Document whether the resident is comatose, the resident's ability to hear, understand, and communicate with others and the resident's ability to see objects nearby in their environment.Corrective Lenses:- >Decreased ability to see can limit the enjoyment of everyday activities and can contribute to social isolation and mood and behavior disorders.- >Many residents who do not have corrective lenses could benefit from them, and others have corrective…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to NEXT STEP HEALTHCARE — 14 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 1.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 1.9 | +1.1 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.6 | +0.4 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 1 of 5 | 2.2 | -1.2 vs chain |
The other 13 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.7★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| NEXT STEP HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/01/2017 |
| DELL'ANNO, DAMIAN | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | since 09/01/2017 |
| KSHEERSAGAR, PANKAJ | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/10/2025 |
| WARD, KIMBERLY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/27/2022 |
| STEPHAN, WILLIAM | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/10/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $552K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Massachusetts Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 225009. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-20, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.