No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Plymouth Harborside Healthcare

19 Obery Street, Plymouth, MA 02360 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 101 certified beds · (508) 747-4790 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Special Focus candidate (CMS is watching this home)Flagged for abuseBehavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)3 immediate-jeopardy citations$321,400 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Sep 2025
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (59) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $321,400 in federal fines (most recent 2026-02-13)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 1 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
59 Long Pond Rd · (781) 626-5180 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
121 Camelot Dr Ste 3 · (508) 732-9700 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
164 South St · (508) 746-1886 · Call to confirm hours
Park
3 Warren Ave · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
8 Pleasant St

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 1 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased14.5%16.4%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.3%5.1%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.7%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection6.2%1.8%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms17.3%15.5%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.4%3.4%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened12.0%15.4%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication30.0%19.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%94.8%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.4%4.2%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control13.9%21.2%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table26.1%21.4%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.9%1.4%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine82.1%77.7%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission36.4%25.7%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit20.6%11.9%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days4.621.881.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.941.501.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

43.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 58 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

43.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
31.3%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.23U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.06hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.13hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 31.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 67 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 28% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 34% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF43.0%CMS range 32.0–54.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.8%CMS range 6.9–14.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge31.3%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge22.4%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge32.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified97.8%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened6.6%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.0%CMS range 4.6–12.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.851.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.60
RN hours/ resident / day
0.77
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.19
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.56
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.47
RN hoursweekends
52.1%
Total nursing turnover
88.2%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 101 beds and averages 77.4 residents a day — about 77% occupied, or roughly 24 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.56 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.60 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.19 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.14 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.73 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.65 to 0.47 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

13
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-02-13)
14
at the previous standard inspection (2024-10-23)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

59 citations, most serious first. The 19 most serious are shown; the remaining 40 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-02-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, records reviewed, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that adequate supervision and interventions were implemented to prevent accidents and failed to maintain an environment free of accident hazards for four Residents (#80, #15, #82, #84) of a total of 20 residents sampled. Specifically, the facility failed to:1. Ensure adequate supervision for Resident #80, a known elopement risk, and enabled access to a designated smoking area with unlocked doors that had access to outside of the facility, thus placing Resident #80 at Immediate Jeopardy risk for serious harm or death.In addition to the Immediate Jeopardy, non-compliance of this requirement also existed because the facility failed to:2. Provide adequate supervision to prevent accidents and to accurately assess Resident #15, who was found to reuse cigarette butts and wore clothing with burn holes; and3. Educate Resident #82 regarding having an oxygen concentrator in a smoking area; and4. Ensure Resident #84, with multiple falls, was utilizing a care planned wheelchair wedge cushion. Findings…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2023-10-11 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), whose physicians' orders indicated he/she was a full code (if a person's heart stops beating and/or they stop breathing, all resuscitation procedures will be provided to keep them alive), the Facility failed to ensure nursing staff provided life saving measures to him/her, when on [DATE], at approximately 5:30 A.M., after Nurse #1 found Resident #1 unresponsive, without pulse and without respiration, she did not call a Code Blue, per facility policy, and Resident #1 was not administered cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Resident #1 was pronounced dead at the facility, approximately two hours after nursing initially found him/her unresponsive. Findings include: Review of the Facility Policy titled, Code Blue, dated as last revised 4/2023, indicated that if a resident is found to be unresponsive or becomes unresponsive under observation, staff will call a Code Blue and would be paged overhead three times, the page will…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2023-10-11 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), whose physicians' orders indicated he/she was a full code (if a person's heart stops beating and/or they stop breathing, all resuscitation procedures will be provided to keep them alive), the Facility failed to ensure nursing staff were competent and had the necessary skill set to respond in an emergency situation which included adequately assessing a resident who was unresponsive with a significant change in condition, calling a Code Blue, and initiating 911 to activate Emergency Medical Services (EMS). On [DATE], at approximately 5:30 A.M., Nurse #1 found Resident #1 unresponsive, briefly assessed him/her, and although Nurse #1 (who was a Licensed Practical Nurse, LPN) was unable to identify Resident #1's code status in his/her medical record, determined him/her to be dead, and did not call a Code Blue or initiate cardiopulmonary resuscitation CPR) and did not call 911. Nurse #2, who was asked by Nurse #1 to complete the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2025-09-16 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of four sampled residents (Resident #2), who was known to exhibit intrusive, combative and aggressive behaviors towards staff, residents, and visitors, the Facility failed to ensure that other residents residing on his/her unit were free from physical abuse, when between May 2025 and August 2025, Resident #2 was involved in several altercations, which included being witnessed by staff as he/she punched a resident in the stomach, climbed into another residents bed and became combative with attempts to be redirected, and it was alleged that he/she punched a resident on the arm and in the face during an unwitnessed altercation. Resident #2's combative and aggressive behaviors place other residents on his/her unit at increased risk for physical abuse.Findings Include:Review of the Facility Policy titled Abuse Investigation and Reporting, dated as last revised 02/2024, indicated that each resident has the right to be free from verbal, sexual, physical and mental abuse,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-08-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents, (Resident #1) whose Plan of Care related to Activities of Daily living (ADLs) indicated that he/she required continual supervision (staff member to be with him/her during entire task) with meals, the facility failed to ensure that staff consistently implemented and followed his/her care plan interventions, when on 05/13/25, Resident #1 was served his/her breakfast tray, then left unsupervised in his/her room with his/her meal, he/she spilled a hot beverage on his/her upper legs, and sustained second-degree burns (partial thickness, involves both the outer (epidermis) and underlying layer (dermis) of skin, they cause pain, redness, swelling, and blistering) to the front side of his/her left thigh, which required treatment.Findings Include: Review of the Facility's Policy titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, dated as revised 01/2024, indicated the following:-A comprehensive, person-centered care plan will be developed for each resident; the care plan will include objectives that meet the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-08-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents, (Resident #1), who required continual supervision (staff member to stay with resident during entire task) during meals, the Facility failed to ensure that he/she was provided with the necessary level of staff supervision during meals in an effort to prevent an incident resulting in an injury. On 05/13/25, Resident #1 was served his/her breakfast tray, left unsupervised in his/her room with his/her meal, spilled a hot beverage on his/her upper legs, and sustained second-degree burns (partial thickness, involves both the outer (epidermis) and underlying layer (dermis) of skin, they cause pain, redness, swelling, and blistering) to the front side of his/her left thigh and required daily treatment to the areas for around four weeks.Findings Include: Review of the Facility's Policy tilted, Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), Supporting, dated as revised 11/2024 indicated the following:-residents who are unable to carry out activities of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-11-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who was severely cognitively impaired, was essentially helpless, unable to participate in care due to left sided hemiparesis (partial paralysis on one side of the body) and had been assessed by nursing as being at high risk for falls, the Facility failed to ensure that his/her care plan related to activities of daily living was updated and accurately identified his/her individual care needs that he/she required two staff members to assist at all times during the provision of care, due to impaired mobility and safety concerns. Although staff consistently documented that Resident #1 required two staff persons for assistance with care, his/her Care Plan and Resident Care Card, both indicated he/she required one or two staff persons for assistance and on 10/13/23, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1 provided personal care to Resident #1 in bed without another staff member present to assist her, when CNA #1 turned Resident #1 onto…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-11-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who was helpless, unable to participate in self care, had limited mobility due to left sided hemiparesis (paralysis on one side of the body), and who had been assessed by nursing as being at high risk for falls, the Facility failed to ensure he/she was provided with the necessary level of staff assistance during care to maintain his/her safety, in an effort to prevent incidents/accidents resulting in an injury. On 10/13/23, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1 provided personal care to Resident #1 in bed without another staff member present to assist her, when she turned Resident #1 on his/her side in bed, he/she began to slide, CNA #1 could not manage him/her, and Resident #1 fell out of bed, landing on the floor on his/her right side. Resident #1 was noted to be bleeding from a laceration to the back of his/her head. Resident #1 was transferred to the Hospital Emergency Department (ED) for evaluation, where he/she received…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-08-30 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on policy review, observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (#70), out of a total sample of 20 residents, received care and treatment to promote healing of a facility acquired deep tissue injury (DTI) (localized area of discolored intact skin or blood-filled blister due to damage of underlying soft tissue from pressure and/or shear) and to help prevent wound deterioration, resulting in worsening of the DTI to a Stage 4 pressure injury (full thickness tissue loss with exposed bone, tendon, or muscle). Specifically, the facility failed to: a. Ensure staff informed the Resident's primary care provider of the wound provider's treatment recommendations after three consecutive wound care visits dated 1/25/23, 1/31/23, and 2/17/23 to help prevent continued deterioration of a left medial ankle pressure wound and implement treatments as ordered; b. Identify and document the condition of the Resident's left medial ankle pressure wound on weekly skin checks; and c. Complete a pressure evaluation form to accurately reflect the date the pressure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-08 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who was receiving Hospice Services, and had physician's orders for the administration of morphine, the Facility failed to ensure he/she was free from a significant medication error, when after nursing obtained new orders to administer a higher dosage of morphine to Resident #1, the previous order for morphine was not discontinued as ordered, and he/she was administered both dosages at the same time in error.Findings include:Review of the Facility Policy titled, Preventing and Detecting Adverse Consequences and Medication Errors, dated 08/2020, indicated the following:-the facility employs a system to ensure that medication usage is evaluated on an ongoing basis;-when a resident has a change in condition, medication-related problems are considered;-significant medication-related problems are assessed, documented and reported as appropriate to the resident's attending physician;-when a resident receives a new medication, the medication order is evaluated for: the dose, route of administration,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-02-13 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, policy review, and document review, the facility failed to set priorities for an effective Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI). Specifically, the facility failed to develop a performance improvement project (PIP) to track, investigate, analyze and use data and information related to:1. The identification of adverse events of residents who required supervision leaving the facility unattended; and2. Resident Council and individual resident identified concerns with call light wait times. Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI): Operations Department, dated as revised in June 2019, indicated the following:-the purpose of the Steering Committee was to review and analyze facility related data and direct appropriate actions for the facility response-data is reviewed initially to identify problems and challenges to be addressed through PIPs and then are used to prioritize the challenges to address first-data will be used to set goals for the PIP, monitor progress, and evaluate the effectiveness…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-13 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice for three Residents (#2, #8, and #39), out of a total sample of 20 residents. Specifically, the facility failed:1. For Resident #2, to inform Nurse Practitioner (NP) #1 timely of medication dosage recommendations following a neurology consult, resulting in a 22-day delay in ordering and implementing the recommendations; 2. For Resident #8, to obtain a urology consultant report per NP #1's order resulting in a 57-day delay in reviewing the recommendations; and3. For Resident #39, to monitor the continuous glucose sensor or hand held reader to ensure they were both working properly and providing accurate blood glucose results, and to ensure the manufacturer's recommendations of changing the sensor every 14 days and rotation of the sensor application site were followed, and to ensure infection control parameters were followed to minimize risk of infection since Resident #39 was admitted to the facility. Findings include: 1. Facility reported no policy for consultant visit…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-13 · tag F0699 — pattern
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a person-centered plan of care with individualized interventions for trauma-informed care was developed for one Resident (#84), out of 20 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed to assess and implement care plan interventions for Resident #84 who had a history of trauma. Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Trauma Informed Care, dated as revised in October 2019, indicated as part of the comprehensive assessment, identifying history of trauma or interpersonal violence when such information is provided to the facility. Identifying past trauma or adverse experiences may involve record review or the use of screening tools. Resident #84 was admitted to the facility in October 2025 with diagnoses of substance use disorder and cognitive impairment. On 2/10/26 at 11:30 A.M., the surveyor observed Resident #84 sitting across from the nurses' station. Resident #84 said he/she was scared and asked the surveyor for help. During an interview on 2/10/26 at 11:30 A.M., Nurse # 2 said…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice for food safety and sanitation to prevent potential spread of foodborne illness to residents who are at high risk. Specifically, the facility failed to:1. Properly label and date food products in the main kitchen walk-in refrigerator, and store food products in the walk-in refrigerator off the floor; and 2. Ensure in two of two kitchenettes, resident food was discarded after three days, and food storage cabinets were kept clean. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Food and Supply Storage, last revised 6/2018, indicated but was not limited to the following:-Food and food supplies are stored to minimize exposure to splash, dust, and other contamination; and stored away from the walls and six inches off the floor and eighteen inches below ceiling and fire sprinkler system.-Food products that are opened and not completely used; transferred from its original package to another storage container; or prepared at the facility and stored should be labeled as to its…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-13 · tag F0847 — pattern
    Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Arbitration Agreement presented to residents as part of the admission packet included the required information for three Residents (#75, #85, and #59), out of a sample of three records reviewed. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the agreement explicitly granted Residents thirty days after signing to rescind the Agreement and failed to explicitly state that the residents (or representatives) were not required to sign as a condition for admission. Findings include:During the entrance conference interview on 2/9/26 at 8:22 A.M., the Administrator said the facility has asked residents to enter into a binding arbitration agreement. 1. Resident #75 was admitted to the facility in January 2026. During an interview on 2/10/26 at 3:37 P.M., Resident #75 said no one had explained any of the paperwork to him/her when they were admitted . He/she said they were handed paperwork and asked to sign it. Review of the Arbitration Agreement signed by Resident #75 on 1/8/26 failed to explicitly state that the Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-13 · tag F0848 — pattern
    Provide a neutral and fair arbitration process and agree to arbitrator and venue.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Arbitration Agreement presented to residents as part of the admission packet included the required information for three Residents (#75, #85, and #59), out of a sample of three records reviewed. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the agreement provided for the selection of a neutral arbitrator agreed upon by both parties and the selection of a venue that was convenient to both parties. Findings include:During the entrance conference interview on 2/9/26 at 8:22 A.M., the Administrator said the facility had asked residents to enter into a binding arbitration agreement. 1. Resident #75 was admitted to the facility in January 2026. Review of the Arbitration Agreement signed by Resident #75 on 1/8/26 failed to indicate both parties would agree to a neutral arbitrator and agree to a venue that was convenient to both parties. 2. Resident #85 was admitted to the facility in December 2025. Review of the Arbitration Agreement signed by Resident #85 failed to indicate both parties would agree to a neutral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen (O2) equipment was maintained in a sanitary manner to help decrease the risk of potential contamination and infection for two Residents (#21 and #15), out of a total sample of 20 residents. Findings include:Review of the World Health Organization: Care, Cleaning and Disinfection of Oxygen Concentrators Checklist (2022) indicated:-Inspect and clean air intake filter (1-2 times per week)1. Pull the filter gently out and replace with spare one.2. Put the filter in cool, soapy water and swirl gently to remove debris.3. Remove from soapy water and place it in [NAME] area until completely dry.4. Store the spare filter until next cleaning is needed. Review of the National Library of Medicine (NLM), dated 1/19/22, indicated but was not limited to:-One of the main issues affecting the oxygen concentrators, is that related to the filters, which are designed to filter out dust, particles,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-13 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (#21), out of a total sample of 20 residents, was assessed by the Interdisciplinary Care Team for self-administration of all their medications and had a physician's order to self-administer medications.Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Self-Administration of Medications, last revised September 2024, indicated but was not limited to:-Residents have the right to self-administer medications if the interdisciplinary team has determined that it is clinically appropriate and safe for the resident to do so.-As part of their overall evaluation the staff and/or provider will assess each resident's mental and physical abilities to determine whether self-administering medications are clinically appropriate for the resident. -The staff and/or provider will document their findings and the choices of the residents who are able to self-administer medications.Resident #21 was admitted to the facility in October 2024 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-13 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and document review, the facility failed to ensure residents/resident representatives had the right to voice and formulate grievances, have those grievances responded to promptly, and be provided a resolution to their grievance for one Resident (#39), out of a total sample of 20 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure staff followed their policy and procedure when Resident #39 voiced a complaint regarding music playing outside his/her room disrupting his/her ability to be comfortable in his/her room. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Grievances, dated 2/2024, indicated but was not limited to the following:-The Administrator is identified as the grievance official responsible for oversight of the grievance process in the facility. This includes responsibility for reviewing and tracking grievances, necessary investigations, ensuring that grievances are addressed and response provided.-If a resident, and/or health care representative, or another…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 40 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-13 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to coordinate an assessment with the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR - a federal requirement to help ensure that individuals who have a mental disorder or intellectual disabilities are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care) program for one Resident (#9), out of a total sample of 20 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to document Resident #9's bipolar disorder diagnosis in Section B at admission and did not initiate a new PASRR Level I Assessment following the addition of a schizoaffective disorder diagnosis to the clinical record. Findings include:Review of the MassHealth Nursing Facility Bulletin 186, dated June 2024, included but was not limited to the following:-Level I Screenings, including Post-admission Screenings, must be performed using the PASRR Level I Screening form via the PASRR Portal. Level I Screenings may not be performed using any other form or screening tool-Post admission Screening:A PASRR screening, using the Level I Screening form submitted via the PASRR…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop, implement and individualize comprehensive care plans for one Resident (#39), out of a total sample of 20 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was developed for the care needs and monitoring related to the diagnosis of Type II DM and the use of a continuous glucose monitoring system (CGM). Findings include: Review of the facility's comprehensive care plan titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, last Revised 1/2024, indicated but was not limited to the following:-A comprehensive, person-centered care plan will be developed for each resident. The care plan will include objectives that meet the residents' physical, psychosocial and functional needs that are developed for each resident.-The residents comprehensive care plan will identify problem areas and their causes as warranted and develop interventions that are targeted and meaningful to the residents.-Evaluations of residents are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the resident and the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and records reviewed, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (#71), out of 20 sampled residents, received care and treatment to promote healing of a pressure ulcer. Specifically, the facility failed to follow physician's orders to offload his/her wound, float his/her heels when in bed, and follow wound orders. Findings include:Review of [NAME], Manual of Nursing Practice 11th edition, dated 2019, indicated the following:-The professional nurse's scope of practice is defined and outlined by the State Board of Nursing that governs practice. Review of the Massachusetts Board of Registration in Nursing Advisory Ruling on Nursing Practice, dated as revised April 11, 2018, indicated the following:-Nurse's Responsibility and Accountability: Licensed nurses accept, verify, transcribe, and implement orders from duly authorized prescriber that are received by a variety of methods (i.e., written, verbal/telephone, standing orders/protocols, pre-printed order sets, electronic) in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who was moderately cognitively impaired, had a Legal Guardianship in effect, and was known to leave the Facility without notifying staff, the Facility failed to ensure he/she was provided with an adequate level of staff supervision, to prevent him/her from eloping, when on several occasions Resident #1 exited the Facility unbeknownst to staff and they were unaware of his/her whereabouts for extended periods of time. Findings include: Review of the Facility's Policy titled Elopements, dated as revised June 2025, indicated the following:- If an employee discovers that a resident is missing from the facility, he/she shall: a. determine if the resident is out on an authorized leave or pass, and b. if the resident was not authorized to leave, notify the Director of Nursing and/Administrator. Resident #1 was admitted to the Facility in September 2025, diagnoses included paranoid schizophrenia and chronic obstructive pulmonary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of four sampled residents (Resident #2) the Facility failed to ensure they reported and/or investigated incidents/allegations of abuse when 1) a family member reported that he attempted to redirect Resident #2 out of his family members room by pushing on Resident #2 and 2) Resident #2 punched a staff member in the face, neither of which were reported or investigated by the Facility.Findings include:Review of the Facility Policy titled Abuse Investigation and Reporting, dated as last revised 02/2024, indicated that each resident has the right to be free from verbal, sexual, physical and mental abuse, neglect, corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, and misappropriation of their property. Every resident in the Facility will be treated with respect and dignity. The Policy indicated the definition of abuse is the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment resulting physical hurt or pain or mental anguish to a resident.The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed, interviews and observation, for two of four sampled residents (Resident #1 and #4), the Facility failed to ensure they developed and/or consistently implemented and followed interventions identified in their plan of care related to the placement and use of a magnetic stop sign across their doorways to minimize the risk of other residents wandering into their rooms. Findings include: Review of the facility Policy titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person Centered, dated as last revised 01/2024, indicted that a comprehensive, person-centered care plan will be developed for each resident and include objectives that meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs for each resident.1) Resident #1 was admitted to the Facility in February 2024, diagnoses include legal blindness, history of falls with vertebral fractures, and dementia.Review of Resident #1's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated he/she scored a six (6) out of 15 on his/her Brief Interview for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-10-23 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and test tray results, the facility failed to serve food that was palatable and at appetizing temperatures for two out of two test trays conducted on two of two units. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Trayline and Meal Delivery, revised June 2018, indicated but was not limited to the following: -Meals are assembled attractively based on the planned menu and resident diet orders, food allergens, and preferences; and delivered within established mealtimes in a manner to maintain palatability and food safety. On 10/18/24 at 1:30 P.M., the surveyor held a Resident Group meeting with 19 residents in attendance, five of which had the following food complaints: -food distribution is slow, the foods sits around in the cart and that is probably when it's not as hot -food sits on the unit -the food is not hot enough -the food is salty -the food is ice cold all the time. On 10/21/24 at 12:02 P.M., the surveyor requested a lunch test tray for the 1st Floor Unit (truck 4). The test tray was placed on the food truck at 12:16 P.M., left the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident with a wound received necessary treatment and services to promote healing for one Resident (#32), out of a total sample of 18 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to address the wound physician's recommendations and accurately implement care and treatment of a non-pressure wound to the Resident's right first toe. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Prevention and Management of Pressure Ulcers/Injuries, dated as last revised 8/2024, indicated but was not limited to the following: -Ensure a resident receives care consistent with professional standards of practice to prevent pressure ulcers and/or residents with pressure ulcer receive necessary treatment and services consistent with professional standards of practice to promote healing, prevent infection, and prevent new ulcer from developing. The facility failed to provide a policy for general skin care and/or non-pressure injuries. The Director of Nurses (DON) said the policy provided was the only skin policy they had. Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-23 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (#42), out of a total sample of 18 residents, received care and treatment to promote healing of pressure injuries. Specifically, the facility failed to accurately transcribe and implement orders for changes in treatments for the care of a stage four pressure ulcer injury (full thickness extending tissue loss that exposes bone, muscle, or tendon) to the left heel. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Prevention and Management of Pressure Ulcers/Injuries, dated as last revised 8/2024, indicated but was not limited to the following: -Residents with pressure ulcer receive necessary treatment and services consistent with professional standards of practice to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing -Conduct risk assessment upon admission, quarterly and with change in condition as warranted -Licensed nurse conducts a weekly skin evaluation -Develop the resident-centered care plan and interventions based on the risk factors identified, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-23 · tag F0699 — pattern
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a person-centered plan of care accounting for the Resident's experiences and preferences in order to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization for one Resident (#24), with a history of trauma, out of a total sample of 18 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Trauma Informed Care, revised October 2019, included but was not limited to the following: -Policy: To guide staff in appropriate and compassionate care specific to individuals who have experienced trauma. -Trauma informed care is culturally sensitive and person-centered. -Nursing staff are trained on screening tools, trauma assessment and how to identify triggers associated with re-traumatization. -Caregivers are taught strategies to help eliminate, mitigate, or sensitively address a resident's triggers. -Include trauma-informed care as part of the QAPI plan, so that needs, and problem areas are identified and addressed. Resident Care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-23 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than 5%. Specifically, one of two nurses made three errors during the medication pass out of a total of 26 opportunities, resulting in a medication error rate of 11.54%. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Administering Medications, dated as last revised 2/2020, indicated but was not limited to the following: -Medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. -Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber's orders. -The individual administering the medication checks the label three times to verify the right resident, right medication, right dosage, right time, and right method (route) of administration before giving the medication. Resident #66 was admitted to the facility in October 2022 with diagnoses including wedge compression fracture and dementia. On 10/18/24 at 9:10 A.M., the surveyor observed Nurse #1 administer medications to Resident #66 which included but were not limited to the following: - High…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice for food safety to prevent the potential of foodborne illness to residents who are at high risk. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Properly label and date food products stored in the walk-in refrigerator in the main kitchen and discard prepared food when past their use by date; 2. Ensure staff did not store personal food items in one of two resident nourishment kitchen refrigerators/freezers reviewed; and 3. Ensure staff performed proper hand hygiene when serving afternoon snacks to residents on the 2nd Floor Unit, blue hallway, and ensure the snack cart did not enter resident rooms. Findings include: Review of a facility document titled Label and Dating for Leftovers and Food Being Prepped for Later Use, undated, indicated but was not limited to the following: -Sandwich spreads must be marked with a 3-day discard. -Trays of drinks and plated desserts must be labeled with the date and meal they are for.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, document review, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program with a complete system of surveillance to identify any trends of actual or potential infections, within the facility using their predetermined infection definition criteria. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Surveillance for Infections, dated as revised July 2024, indicated but was not limited to the following: - The purpose of surveillance of infections is to identify both individual cases and trends of epidemiologically significant organisms and healthcare-associated infections to guide appropriate interventions and prevent future infections. - Criteria for infections are based on current standard definitions of infections. - In addition to collecting data on incidents of infections the surveillance system is designated to capture certain epidemiologically important data that may influence how overall surveillance data is interpreted, for example: surveillance data gathered for residents with a recent hospital stay. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-23 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement an antibiotic stewardship program which included antibiotic use protocols and monitoring of antibiotic use in accordance with the facility's antibiotic stewardship program. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Antibiotic Stewardship Program, last revised 1/24, indicated but was not limited to the following: -The antibiotic stewardship program establishes antibiotic treatment recommendations to optimize antibiotic prescribing, monitoring, and communication of resident changes in condition(s) to improve resident outcomes related to antibiotic use. -Appropriate indications for use of antibiotics include Criteria met for clinical definition of active infection: McGeer Criteria (a set of guidelines used to help identify infections in long-term care facilities). -As part of the facility antibiotic stewardship program, clinical infections treated with antibiotics will undergo review by the infection preventionist, or designee. -The infection preventionist, or designee, will review antibiotic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-23 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on document review and interview, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (#279) was provided a summary of their baseline care plan meeting, out of a total sample of 18 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Care Plans-Baseline, dated November 2017, indicated but was not limited to the following: -A baseline plan of care to meet the resident's immediate needs shall be developed for each resident within forty-eight (48) hours of admission. -The resident and their representative will be provided a summary of the baseline care plan that includes but is not limited to: a. The initial goals of the resident; b. A summary of the resident's medications and dietary instructions; and c. Any services and treatments to be administered by the facility and personnel acting on behalf of the facility; and any updated information based on the details of the comprehensive care plan, as necessary. Resident #279 was admitted to the facility in October 2024 and had diagnoses including atrial fibrillation, dementia, neuropathy (weakness, numbness, and pain from nerve…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-23 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure professional standards of practice were maintained during medication administration. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure three medications ordered by the physician were available and administered as ordered to one Resident (#66), out of a total of six residents observed during medication administration. Findings include: Review of the Massachusetts Board of Registration in Nursing Advisory Ruling 9324 titled Accepting, Transcribing, and Implementing Prescriber Orders, dated as last revised April 11, 2018, indicated but was not limited to the following: -It is the responsibility of the licensed nurse to ensure that there is a proper patient care order from a duly authorized prescriber prior to the administration of any prescription or non-prescription medication. -Nurse's Responsibility and Accountability: Licensed nurses accept, verify, transcribe, and implement orders from duly authorized prescribers. -In any situation where an order is unclear, or a nurse questions the appropriateness,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-23 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services for the care of an indwelling suprapubic cystostomy catheter (surgical procedure that creates a connection between the bladder and the skin to drain urine) for one Resident (#24), out of a total sample of 18 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the Resident's urinary collection bag was kept below the level of the bladder and not in contact with the floor to help prevent catheter-related urinary tract infections and any related problems. Findings include: During an interview on 10/22/24 at 10:53 A.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) said the facility did not have a policy on Foley catheter care, only the insertion of. Review of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance titled Summary of Recommendations: Guideline for Prevention of Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections, dated 3/25/24, indicated but was not limited to the following: III. Proper Techniques for Urinary Catheter Maintenance: -Keep the collection bag below the level of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-23 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain the necessary respiratory care and services for one Resident (#57), out of a total sample of 18 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions of bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP - non-invasive breathing machine that helps people breathe when they're having trouble) mask and tubing and oxygen (O2) concentrator (medical device that separates nitrogen from the air around you so you can breathe up to 95% pure oxygen) equipment to help decrease the risk of potential contamination and exposure of infection to the resident. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled CPAP/BiPAP S/T/Support, revised January 2018, indicated but was not limited to the following: -CPAP (continuous positive airway pressure) and BiPAP can be used in conjunction with ventilation to improve oxygenation. -BiPAP delivers separate pressure settings for expiration (EPAP) and inspiration (IPAP). -CPAP/BiPAP may be appropriate for improving arterial oxygenation in residents with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-23 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure for one Resident (#65), out of five residents selected for unnecessary medication review, that their medication regimen was free from unnecessary psychotropic medications (drugs that affect the brain and nervous system including but not limited to antidepressants, antianxiety, antipsychotics, and sedatives). Specifically, the facility failed to ensure an as needed (PRN) psychotropic medication order for Ativan (anti-anxiety) was limited to 14 days unless the provider documented a rational to extend the PRN and the order was written for a specific longer duration. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Psychotropic Medication, dated as last revised 7/2023, indicated but was not limited to the following: -Residents will not receive PRN doses of psychotropic medications unless that medication is necessary to treat a specific condition or diagnosis and that is documented in the clinical record. -The need to continue PRN orders for psychotropic medications beyond 14 days requires that the practitioner…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a clean environment and equipment and furniture in good repair, on one of two units. Findings include: On 8/30/23 at approximately 8:10 A.M. to 10:00 A.M., the surveyor observed the following on the first floor: -room [ROOM NUMBER]A, the drawer was broken and separated from the bedside table and sitting on the floor. -room [ROOM NUMBER]A, the resident said the call light was not working. Upon examination, the button was sticky to the touch, and could not be pushed in. The bed remote controls were not fully functioning, and the foot of the bed could not be elevated. -Main Dining Room, the large skylight had a buildup of mold along the edges, and the glass was dirty. The three sliders, located along one side of the dining room, were observed to have a buildup of moss/mold substance at the base of each door. -room [ROOM NUMBER]A, the floor fan had a buildup of dust, and there were two holes (approximately 2 X 4 inches) in the wall, located behind…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-30 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, grievance book review, and interview, the facility failed to implement their grievance policy and ensure that: 1. Grievances voiced by residents were addressed and prompt efforts were made to resolve the grievances relative to smoking and overnight staff sleeping during their shift; 2. Five out of nine Grievance/Compliant Forms reviewed were completed properly and/or resolved within 3-5 working days; and 3. Staff documented receipt of all grievances on the Grievance Log which is used for tracking and trending purposes. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Grievances, revised [DATE], indicated but was not limited to the following: -The Administrator is identified as the Grievance Official responsible for oversight of the grievance process in the facility. This includes responsibility for reviewing and tracking grievances, leading any investigations, ensuring that grievances and/or complaints are confirmed or not confirmed, and that a written grievance decision has been…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on policy review, observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide an environment free of accident hazards as possible for three Residents (#21, #37, and #63), out of a total sample of 20 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. For Resident #21, ensure supervision was provided, smoking articles were maintained safely, and protective equipment was utilized; 2. For Resident #37, ensure supervision was provided and smoking articles were maintained safely; and 3. For Resident #63, ensure that cigarettes were properly secured after use. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Smoking Policy-Residents, dated 11/2017, indicated but was not limited to the following: - The facility shall maintain safe resident smoking practices. - Smoking is only permitted in designated smoking areas, which are located outside of the building. - Smoking is not allowed inside the facility under any circumstances. - The resident will be evaluated on admission and evaluation will include the ability to smoke safely with or without supervision. - Any…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-30 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and records reviewed, for one Resident (#69) of 20 sampled residents, the facility failed to ensure an indwelling urinary catheter was assessed for removal resulting in the extended use of an indwelling device. Findings include: Resident #69 was admitted to the facility in October 2021. He/she was re-admitted to the facility in March 2023 with an indwelling urinary catheter and diagnoses which included: diabetes mellitus, urinary tract infection, and hypertension. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 8/8/23, indicated Resident #69 was cognitively intact as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 and had an indwelling catheter. Review of the Hospital Discharge summary, dated [DATE], indicated Resident #69 had an indwelling urinary catheter and a urinary tract infection. Further review of the Discharge Summary indicated Resident #69 should follow-up with urology as an outpatient. Review of the Care Plans for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-30 · tag F0712 — pattern
    Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that seven Residents (#39, #70, #69, #53, #28, #62, and #18), in a total sample of 20 residents, had physician visits every 60 days which would alternate between the physician and the nurse practitioner (NP) (indicating the physician would see the resident every 120 days). Findings include: 1. Resident #39 was admitted to the facility in June 2023 with diagnoses including heart failure, pneumonia, diabetes mellitus type 2, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe). Review of the medical record indicated the following Physician/Nurse Practitioner documentation: 1/6/23 - Progress Note (NP) 1/16/23- Routine Progress Note (Physician) 4/11/23 - Progress Note (NP) 5/20/23 - Progress Note (NP) 6/14/23 - Progress Note (NP) (last entry) During an interview on 8/30/23 at 10:01 A.M., Resident #39 said he/she had not seen his/her physician in a long time and said it's ridiculous. During an interview on 8/30/23 at 10:04 A.M., Physician #1 said the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-30 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on records reviewed, policies reviewed, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure targeted behaviors and signs and symptoms of side effects were adequately monitored to evaluate the effectiveness of psychotropic medication to promote or maintain the resident's highest practicable mental, physical, and psychosocial well-being for two Residents (#13 and #15), out of a total sample of 20 residents. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #13, to monitor for targeted behaviors with the use of psychotropic medication; and 2. For Resident #15, to monitor for signs and symptoms of side effects for a benzodiazepine being utilized for anxiety. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Psychotropic Medication, dated March 2018, indicated but was not limited to: -Obtain physician's order. -A physician's order and an appropriate diagnosis is required for all psychotropic medications. -An informed consent from the resident (or legally authorized individual in the case of resident incompetence) is required for administration of psychotropic medication. -The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-30 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of significant medication errors for one Resident (#70), out of a total sample of 20 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: a. ensure Novolog (Insulin Aspart) (fast acting insulin that controls blood sugar around meal times) injection solution was administered only if the capillary blood glucose (CBG) level was 120 or above in accordance with physician's orders, resulting in a potential for significant adverse consequences to the Resident; and b. monitor for potential signs and symptoms of adverse consequences (i.e., side effects) related to the use of an anti-diabetic injectable medication. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Diabetes-Clinical Protocol, revised December 2020, indicated but was not limited to the following: -The physician will order desired parameters for monitoring and reporting information related to diabetes or blood sugar management. -The staff will incorporate such parameters into the Medication Administration Record and care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain storage of all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments, under proper temperature controls. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: 1. Compartments containing drugs and biologicals were locked when not in use, for one of two medication carts, on one of two floors; and 2. All drugs and biologicals were stored under proper temperature controls, for one of one medication refrigerator inspected; and 3. For Resident #63, ensure all drugs and biologicals were safely secured in a locked compartment, located in the Resident's room; and 4. For Resident #39, ensure all drugs were safely secured in a locked compartment, located in the Resident's room. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Storage of Medications, dated as revised August 2020, indicated, but was not limited to the following: - Only licensed nurses, pharmacy personnel, and those lawfully authorized to administer medications such as medication aides…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on policy and record review, observation, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain medical records that were complete, accurate, organized, and readily accessible, for 3 out of 20 sampled residents, and for 2 out of 5 Residents observed during a medication pass. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #18, to ensure information received monthly from the dialysis center documenting new laboratory results and trends, was kept and included in the Resident's medical record; and 2. For Residents #26 and #16, to ensure Physician's orders for prescribed medication were complete, with instructions for mixing; and 3. For Resident #7, to ensure the medical record accurately reflects the parties responsible for each Resident; and 4. For Resident #53, a.) to ensure the medical record accurately reflected his/her responsible party, and b.) to ensure the medical record contained only his/her documentation. 1. Resident #18 was admitted to the facility in January 2021 with diagnoses that included end stage renal disease and receives dialysis three time a week, anemia, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-30 · tag F0887 — pattern
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on policy review, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure 27 residents, out of a sample of 87 residents, were offered the COVID-19 vaccine in a timely manner. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled COVID Vaccine of Residents, dated 12/20 last revised 5/2023, indicated but was not limited to the following: - Residents will be offered COVID vaccine to aid in preventing/spreading of SARS infection. - Upon admission, residents will be assessed for eligibility to receive the recommended COVID vaccine/booster, and when indicated, will be offered the vaccine/booster unless medically contraindicated, refusal by the resident or health care representative, or the resident has already been vaccinated. - Administration of the COVID vaccine/booster will be made in accordance with current Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) / Department of Public Health (DPH) and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). Review of the CDC website www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/stay-up-to-date.html, last updated July 17, 2023 recommends…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and records reviewed, the facility failed to treat one Resident (#28), of 20 sampled residents, with respect and dignity. Specifically, the facility failed to allow Resident #28 to exercise his/her right to smoke. Findings include: Resident #28 was admitted to the facility in May 2022 with the following diagnoses: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), hypertension, and heart failure. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/16/23, indicated Resident #28 was cognitively intact as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15. During an interview on 8/25/23 at 2:31 P.M., Resident #28 said he/she recently lost their right to smoke for a two-week timeframe after being observed smoking in the wrong location. Resident #28 said he/she was told they lost their smoking privileges for two weeks and if he/she was caught again they would be discharged . Resident #28 said he/she was informed that smoking is not a right but is a privilege. Review of Resident #28's Nurses Note, dated 7/5/23, indicated Resident #28 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-30 · tag F0551 — isolated
    Give the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the Resident Representative was fully informed in advance and given information necessary to make health care decisions to the extent required by the court for one Resident (#15), from a total sample of 20 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Psychotropic Medication, dated March 2018, indicated but was not limited to: -Obtain physician's order. -A physician's order and an appropriate diagnosis is required for all psychotropic medications. -An informed consent from the resident (or legally authorized individual in the case of resident incompetence) is required for administration of psychotropic medication. -The Interdisciplinary Team assesses and monitors the appropriateness, effectiveness, and side effects associated with psychotropic medications for each resident via resident care plan review. The resident, and when indicated, the family or responsible person, will be included in this process prior to administration. Resident #15 was readmitted to the facility in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-30 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure for one Resident (#39), that medications were not self-administered without a physician's order and an assessment for self-administration, out of a total sample of 20 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Safety and Supervision of Residents, revised April 2018, indicated but was not limited to the following: -As part of their overall evaluation, the staff and/or practitioner will assess each resident's mental and physical abilities to determine whether self-administering medications is clinically appropriate for the resident. -In addition to general evaluation of decision-making capacity, the staff and/or practitioner will perform a more specific skill assessment, including but not limited to the resident's: a. Ability to read and understand medication labels; b. Comprehension of the purpose and proper dosage and administration time for his or her medications; c. Ability to remove medications from a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-30 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a reasonable accommodation was made for one Resident (#1), out of a total sample of 20 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the call system button was accessible to the Resident to summon assistance when needed. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Answering Call Lights, revised April 2018, indicated but was not limited to the following: -Ask the resident to return the demonstration so that you will be sure that the resident can operate the system. -When the resident is in bed or confined to a chair be sure the call light is within easy reach of the resident. -Report all defective call lights to the nurse supervisor promptly. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility in February 2020 with diagnoses including dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), cerebral infarction with left hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body), muscle weakness, dementia, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and malignant neoplasm of the colon. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-30 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, observation, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's right to personal privacy and confidentiality was promoted and protected when a staff member provided a printed copy of the facility's Resident Census to a visitor. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Confidentiality of Personal Privacy, dated as last revised 11/2017, indicated but was not limited to: - The facility will safeguard the personal privacy and confidentiality of all resident personal and medical records. - Access to resident personal and medical records will be limited to authorized staff and business associates. - The facility will strive to protect the resident's privacy regarding his/her: a. accommodations e. visits - Release of resident information, including video, audio or computer stored information, will be handled in accordance with resident rights and privacy policies. On 10/19/23 at 11:59 A.M., a person knocked on the door of the conference room where the surveyors were seated for the duration of the survey. The person introduced himself as a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on policy review, record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement the Plan of Care for one Resident (#21), out of a total sample of 20 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to implement fall prevention and smoking interventions. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, dated 11/2017, indicated but was not limited to the following: - A comprehensive, person-centered care plan is developed and implemented for each resident. - Each resident's person-centered care plan will be consistent with resident rights, including the right to receive the services and/or items included in the plan of care. - The comprehensive, person-centered care plan will: a. Describe the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. b. Incorporate identified problem areas. c. Incorporate risk factors associated with identified problems. d. Reflect treatment goals, timetables, and objectives in measurable…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-30 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to develop a person-centered plan of care which included trauma informed approaches and identified triggers to avoid potential re-traumatization for one Resident (#62) with a history of trauma, out of a total sample of 20 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Trauma Informed Care, revised October 2019, included but was not limited to: -Policy: To guide staff in appropriate and compassionate care specific to individuals who have experienced trauma. -Trauma informed care is culturally sensitive and person-centered. -Caregivers are taught strategies to help eliminate, mitigate or sensitively address a resident's triggers. -Resident-Care Strategies -As part of the Comprehensive Assessment, identified history of trauma or interpersonal violence when such information is provided to the facility. Identifying past trauma or adverse experiences may involve record review or the use of screening tools. -Reduce or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-30 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and records reviewed for two Residents (#13 and #21), of 20 sampled residents, the facility failed to monitor for signs and symptoms of adverse consequences (i.e., side effects) of medication. Specifically, for Residents #13 and #21 the facility failed to monitor for signs and symptoms of hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia (high and low blood sugars) with the administration of insulin (anti-diabetic injectable medication). Findings include: 1. Resident #13 was admitted to the facility in January 2023 with diagnoses which included diabetes mellitus and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 7/25/23, indicated Resident #13 had received insulin. Review of Resident #13's current Physician's Orders indicated but was not limited to: -Humalog Kwikpen (insulin) subcutaneous (under the skin) solution pen-injector 100 unit/milliliter (mL) inject as per sliding scale, dated 1/22/23 -Lantus Subcutaneous Solution (insulin) 100 unit/mL inject 52 units subcutaneously one time a day for diabetes, dated 6/14/23…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-30 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on policy review, record review, and interview, the facility failed to assess for eligibility, and offer Pneumococcal Vaccination per the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendations for one Resident (#42), out of a sample of five residents. Findings include: Review of facility's policy titled Pneumococcal Vaccine, dated 11/2017 and last revised 7/2023, indicated but was not limited to the following: - All residents will be offered pneumococcal vaccines to aid in preventing pneumonia/pneumococcal infections - Upon admission, residents will be assessed for eligibility to receive the pneumococcal vaccine series and when indicated, will be offered the vaccine unless medically contraindicated, refusal by the resident or health care representative, or the resident has already been vaccinated. - If a resident refuses, appropriate entries will be documented in the medical record indicating the date of refusal. - For residents who receive the vaccines the date of vaccination, lot number, expiration date, person administering, and the site of the vaccination will be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2024-10-23 · tag F0645 — pattern
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to obtain a Level II Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR- screen to determine if a resident had an intellectual or developmental disability and/or serious mental illness (ID/DD/SMI) and needed further evaluation) for one Resident (#25), out of a total sample of 18 residents, who transferred to the facility in 2019. Findings include: Review of the MassHealth Nursing Facility Bulletin 169 titled Updates to Nursing Facility Regulations: preadmission screening and resident review (PASARR) for intellectual disability, developmental disability, and serious mental illness, dated June 2024, indicated but was not limited to the following: - Level II Evaluation. A comprehensive independent evaluation that is consistent with federal PASARR regulations at 42 CFR 483.134, and conducted on individuals that have positive Level I Screenings. The Level II Evaluation is a person-centered assessment taking into account all relevant information, including the individual's or individual's authorized representative's goals and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2023-08-30 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and records reviewed, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for three Residents (#53, #62, and #63), from a total sample of 20 residents. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #53, to accurately reflect the number of days he/she received an anticoagulant (a group of medications that decrease your blood's ability to clot); 2. For Resident #62, to accurately reflect the Resident's current use of tobacco, and complete the BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) assessment; and 3. For Resident #63, to accurately reflect the Resident's current use of tobacco. Findings include: 1. Resident #53 was admitted to the facility in October 2022 with the following diagnoses: dementia, heart disease, and atrial fibrillation (an irregular heart rhythm). Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 8/3/23, section N, indicated Resident #53 had received an anticoagulant on seven of the seven days reviewed. Review of Resident #53's July and August 2023 Medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$321,400 in federal fines across 6 penalties.

  • $70,811 — penalty dated 2026-02-13
  • $197,977 — penalty dated 2025-09-16
  • $10,358 — penalty dated 2025-08-05
  • $11,638 — penalty dated 2023-11-14
  • $15,269 — penalty dated 2023-08-30
  • $15,347 — penalty dated 2023-08-30

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to NEXT STEP HEALTHCARE — 14 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 51.7-0.7 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 51.9-0.9 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.6-0.6 vs chain
Quality measures 1 of 52.2-1.2 vs chain
The other 13 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.7★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
NEXT STEP HEALTHCARE LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/24/2025
DELL'ANNO, DAMIANIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/01/2017
STEPHAN, WILLIAMIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/01/2017
NGUYEN, NINAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/14/2025
RATTAN, ROHITIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/08/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$9.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-6.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$494K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 69%Medicare 6%Other / private 25%

This home reported $494K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$343per resident / day
operating cost
$10,421per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$322per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Massachusetts Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Massachusetts
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,817/mo
Nursing home (private)
$9,600/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 225284. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next