No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Melrose Healthcare

40 Martin Street, Melrose, MA 02176 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 106 certified beds · (781) 665-7050 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (781) 665-7050 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Special Focus candidate (CMS is watching this home)Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Apr 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 actual-harm citation$49,324 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (33% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Apr 2024
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (66) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $49,324 in federal fines (most recent 2025-04-09)
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
Tremont Street · (781) 665-8600 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
50 Tremont St Ste 203 · (855) 977-9736 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Shaw's0.5 mi
34 Essex St · (781) 665-8512 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Florence St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
131 W Emerson St · (781) 665-3890

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased3.4%16.4%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.2%5.1%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder2.1%0.8%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.8%1.8%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms16.7%15.5%6.5%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.5%3.4%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened9.1%15.4%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication12.5%19.5%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine99.0%94.8%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.4%4.2%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control32.6%21.2%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table29.9%21.4%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.6%1.4%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine60.9%77.7%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission17.6%25.7%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit13.6%11.9%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.851.881.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.371.501.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

11.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
40.9%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.07U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
<0.01hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 40.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 22 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.07 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 3% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.2%CMS range 7.5–17.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge40.9%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge36.4%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge45.5%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened12.9%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.901.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.50
RN hours/ resident / day
0.83
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.16
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.49
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.33
RN hoursweekends
32.9%
Total nursing turnover
64.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 106 beds and averages 94.4 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.49 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.50 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.16 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.30 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.56 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.57 to 0.33 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 33% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

27
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-04-09)
17
at the previous standard inspection (2024-04-03)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

66 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 55 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2025-04-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary treatment, services, interventions to promote healing and prevent new ulcers from developing for one Resident (#9) out of 23 total sampled residents. Specifically, for Resident #9, the facility failed to implement multiple wound care treatment recommendations as recommended by the consultant Wound Physician Assistant (PA), including not implementing the recommended treatment type and/or at the recommended frequency, resulting in the deterioration of pressure ulcers and development of bilateral heel osteomyelitis (an infection of the bone). Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled 'Prevention and management of Pressure Ulcers/Injuries', revised November 2024, indicated: - If a new pressure ulcer is identified, assess the area and notify the provider for treatment order. Resident #9 was admitted to the facility in November 2024 with diagnoses including diabetes and mild cognitive impairment. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide a dignified dining experience for the residents of the facility as well as provide a dignified existence for four Residents (# 52, #14, #57 and #13), out of a total sample of 23 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1) provide a dignified dining experience to the residents on the first and second floor, 2) provide privacy during care for Resident #52, 3) provide dignity while providing incontinence care by using double incontinence briefs for Residents #52, #14 and #57 and 4) provide a dignified environment for Resident #13. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, :Resident Rights, dated 1/24, indicated the following: -Employees shall treat all residents with kindness, respect and dignity. a. Federal and state laws guarantee certain basic rights to all residents of this facility. These rights include the resident's right to: a. a dignified existence b. be treated with respect, kindness, and dignity t.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a home-like environment. Specifically, 1. The facility failed to ensure that the second floor was free from odors. 2. For Resident #80, the facility failed to ensure the resident's room did not smell of urine and was free from small black flying insects. 3. For Resident #52, the facility failed to ensure his/her mattress was intact without any missing fabric. Findings include: The facility was unable to provide a home-like environment policy. 1. On 4/6/25, the surveyors noted the second floor unit had a strong odor of stale urine and body odor throughout the hallways, and dining area at various times during the day (7:00 A.M. - 3:00 P.M.) On 4/7/25 and 4/8/25, the surveyors noted the second floor unit had a strong odor of stale urine and body odor throughout the hallways, and dining area at various times during the day (6:45 A.M. - 3:00 P.M.) During an interview on 4/6/25 at 12:40 P.M., Family member #1 said she comes on different days and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure resident centered care plans were developed and/or implemented for three Residents (#20, #14, #88) out of a total sample of 23 residents. Specifically, 1. For Resident #20, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive pacemaker care plan. 2. For Resident #14, who was assessed to be at moderate risk for falls the facility failed to implement non-skid strips by his/her bed as per the plan of care. 3. For Resident #88, the facility failed to develop a personalized care plan with resident-specific interventions for suicidal indication history. 4. For Resident #88, the facility failed to develop and implement a personalized care plan for use of a hand orthotic as indicated by Occupational Therapy Findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Care of a Resident with a Pacemaker, dated 3/18, indicated the following: -1. For each resident with a pacemaker, document the following in the medical record and on a pacemaker…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-09 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were implemented for two Residents (#70 and #4) out of a total sample of 23 residents. Specifically, 1. For Residents #70, who is at risk for developing pressure ulcers, the facility failed to ensure his/her air mattress was set according to the physician's order. 2. For Resident #4, the facility failed to follow a physician's order to obtain a Urine Analysis in a timely manner. Findings include: Review of the Massachusetts Board of Registration in Nursing Advisory Ruling on Nursing Practice, dated as revised April 11, 2018, indicated: - Nurse's Responsibility and Accountability: Licensed nurses accept, verify, transcribe, and implement orders from duly authorized prescriber's that are received by a variety of methods (i.e., written, verbal/telephone, standing orders/protocols, pre-printed order sets, electronic) in emergent and non-emergent situations. Licensed nurses in a management role must ensure an infrastructure is in place, consistent with current standards of care, to minimize…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2c. Resident #34 was admitted to the facility in February 2024 with diagnoses including hemiplegia. Review of Resident #34's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated the Resident scored 13 out of a possible 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (MDS) which indicated he/she is cognitively intact. The MDS also indicated Resident #34 required partial to moderate assistance for self-feeding tasks. On 4/6/25 at 8:14 A.M., Resident #34 was observed lying in bed while eating breakfast. There were no staff in the room to provide assistance if needed and the Resident was not visible from the hallway. On 4/6/25 at 12:45 P.M., Resident #34 was observed eating lunch at a table at the end of the second-floor unit hallway. There were no staff at that end of the hallway and the Resident was not visible from the nursing station. From 12:45 P.M., to 12:59 P.M., the Resident was observed staring at his/her lunch and not eating. On 4/7/25 at 8:17 A.M., Resident #34 was observed lying in bed while eating…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-09 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. Specifically, the facility failed to meet the facility-determined minimum for certified nurse assistant (CNA) staff on the weekends. Findings Include: Review of the facility assessment, reviewed 3/5/25, indicated: Direct Care Staffing Ratios: Unit A: Days 3 CNAs, Evenings 3 CNAs, Nights 2 CNAs. Unit B: Days 3 CNAs, Evenings 3 CNAs, Nights 2 CNAs. 2nd Floor: Days 4 CNAs, Evenings 4 CNAs, Nights 3 CNAs. Review of this facility assessment indicated total CNA staffing required for facility from 3/5/25 to 4/9/25 should be: Days 10 CNAs, Evenings 10 CNAs, Nights 7 CNAs. Review of electronic correspondence given to surveyor from the Director of Operations to the Regional Nurse, dated 4/9/25, indicated: - The facility assessment was updated in December 2024 and reviewed in QAPI 12/18/24. The staffing requirements by unit prior…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-09 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, record review, staff education review, and Facility Assessment review, the facility failed to ensure the nursing staff were trained and demonstrated the competencies and skill sets necessary to provide the level and types of care and services needed as outlined in the Facility Assessment. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure licensed nursing staff were trained and demonstrated competency related to wound care. Findings include: According to the Board of Registration in Nursing, 244 CMR 9.00: Standards of Conduct, a competency is defined as the application of knowledge and the use of affective, cognitive, and psychomotor skills required for the role of a nurse licensed by the Board and for the delivery of safe nursing care in accordance with accepted standards of practice. Competency is a measurable pattern of knowledge, skills, abilities, behaviors, and other characteristics that an individual needs to perform work roles or occupational functions successfully. Review of the comprehensive Facility Assessment Tool, revised 3/5/25, included but was not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-09 · tag F0730 — pattern
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on personnel file review and interview, the facility failed to ensure annual performance reviews were completed at least every 12 months for 5 of 5 Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) personnel files reviewed. Findings include: Review of 5 Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) personnel files, who had been employed by the facility for over 12 months, indicated: - 5 out of 5 failed to include documentation of an annual performance review. During an interview on 4/9/25 at 11:34 A.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) said all CNAs are required to have annual performance reviews completed and the documentation of completion should be readily available. The DON said she was unable to locate any of the 5 CNA annual performance reviewed requested by the surveyor.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff stored drugs and biologicals in accordance with State and Federal requirements. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure a medication cart, treatment carts on the first and second floor and the second floor's medication room were locked while a nurse was not present. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Storage of Medications, dated 8/20, indicated the following: -Medications and biologicals are stored safely, securely, and properly, following manufacturer's recommendations or those of the supplier. The medication supply is accessible only to licensed nursing personnel, pharmacy personnel, or staff members lawfully authorized to administer medications. Medication rooms, carts, and medication supplies are locked when they are not attended by persons with authorized access. On 4/6/25 at 6:47 A.M., the surveyor observed the medication cart on the first floor unlocked and unsupervised. No staff were present at the cart, the surveyor was able to access the cart and medications.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-09 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to serve what was listed on the menu for all meals during the survey period. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure residents received milk with their meals as indicated on the menu. Findings include: During the survey period, all surveyors observed residents who did not receive any milk as their meal tickets indicated they should with their meals during the survey period. Review of the facility menu for the duration of the survey period indicated that milk is to be served with all meals. During an interview on 4/9/25 at 8:41 A.M., the Foodservice Director (FSD) reviewed the menus with the surveyor. The surveyor asked if milk is part of the menu and if every resident should be served it, the FSD responded by saying milk is typically only provided if the resident gets coffee or tea with their meal. During an interview on 4/9/25 at 9:10 A.M., the Corporate Registered Dietitian (RD) said milk is built into the nutritional breakdown for all menus, therefore it should be served for all residents unless they do…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 55 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-09 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident group meeting, interview and test tray results, the facility failed to ensure foods provided to the residents were prepared by methods that conserve palatability and are at appetizing temperatures on four of four units. Findings include: The facility was unable to provide a policy regarding food temperature palatability. During the initial Resident screening process, numerous residents voiced concerns and displeasure about the overall food quality, temperature, and variety they are provided. During the resident council group meeting on 4/8/25, at 11:05 A.M., 10 out of 16 participating residents complained that the food is always cold and does not taste good. On 4/8/25, the surveyors conducted test tray audits during lunch on all units of the facility, the results were as followed: On the first floor A-unit side, the meal cart arrived on the unit at 12:00 P.M., the surveyor received the tray at 12:12 P.M., the following was recorded: - Stuffed shell pasta with cheese was 120 degrees Fahrenheit and was warm, not hot. - Salad was 79 degrees Fahrenheit and room…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to properly follow food handling practices to prevent the risk of foodborne illness in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Findings include: The surveyor made the following observations during the lunch trayline on 4/8/25: - At 11:38 A.M., the cook began trayline service, the cook had a visible beard approximately one-inch long and was not wearing a beard net. - At 11:41 A.M., a diet aide removed disposable gloves and then touched her pants with her bare hands, then touched the oven knobs and then put on a new pair of disposable gloves without washing her hands, thus contaminating her gloves. At 11:44 A.M., the diet aide removed her disposable gloves and used oven mits to remove a tray from the oven. She then put on new disposable gloves without washing her hands, contaminating the gloves. The diet aide then put on new gloves and directly touched bread, contaminating the bread. - At 11:59 A.M., the cook left the tray line, opened a door to leave the kitchen and got a new box of disposable gloves with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-09 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to obtain consent for the use of psychotropic medication for one Resident (#8) out of a total sample of 23 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Psychotropic Medication, dated 7/2023, indicated the following: -A written informed consent from the resident (or legally authorized individual in the case of competency) is required for administration of psychotropic medication. -The interdisciplinary team assesses and monitors the appropriateness, effectiveness, and side effects associated with psychotropic medications for each resident via resident care plan review period the resident, and one indicated, the family or responsible person, will be included in this process prior to the administration of dose. Resident #8 was admitted to the facility in August 2019 with diagnoses including unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, mood disturbance, anxiety. Review of Resident #8's most recent Minimum…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-09 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a Roger's treatment plan (a judge and legal guardian decide when an antipsychotic medication can be administered) was valid and kept up to date for one Resident (#8) out of a total of 23 sampled Residents. Findings include: Resident #8 was admitted to the facility in [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, mood disturbance, anxiety. Review of Resident #8's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated the Resident score a 3 out of a possible 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) which indicated he/she had severe cognitive impairment. The MDS also indicated Resident #8 was dependent on staff for self-care tasks. Review of Resident #8's medical record indicated the Resident has active physician orders for two antipsychotic medications. Review of Resident #8's medical record indicated a Roger's treatment plan that expired on [DATE]. When asked, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-09 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to file a grievance for one Resident (#80), out of 23 total sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure staff filed a grievance on behalf of Resident #80, who complained that his/her pants were missing. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled 'Grievances, revised February 2024, indicated: - If a resident, and/or health care representative, or another interested family member of a resident has a complaint, a staff member will inform the person of the grievance process and assist the resident, or person acting on the resident's behalf, to file a written grievance with the facility using the Grievance form as needed. - Grievances may be submitted orally or in writing. Note: If a grievance is submitted orally, the facility employee taking the grievance must write it up on the grievance report form. - The Administrator will document receipt of all grievances on the Grievance Log. Resident #80 was admitted to the facility in February 2024 with diagnoses including hypertension and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for two Residents (#20, and #9), out of a total sample of 23 residents. Specifically, 1. For Resident #20, the facility failed to ensure his/her pacemaker checks were completed. 2. For Resident #9, the failed ensure six bilateral foot wounds were assessed and measured weekly. Findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Care of a Resident with a Pacemaker, dated 3/18, indicated the following: -2. When the resident's pacemaker is monitored by the Physician, document the date and results of the pacemaker surveillance, including: a. How the resident's pacemaker was monitored (phone, office, internet); 1. Resident #20 was admitted to the facility in October 2024 with diagnoses that included dementia, presence of cardiac pacemaker, heart failure, asthma, and type 2 diabetes. Review of Resident #20's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the resident environment remained free of accident hazards for two Residents (#149 and #88) out of a total sample of 23 residents. Specifically: 1. For Resident #149, the facility failed to implement fall interventions after a fall. 2. For Resident #88, the facility failed to ensure that the Resident was wearing a smoking apron as indicated in the medical record while the Resident was smoking. Findings include: 1. Resident #149 was admitted to the facility in January 2025 with diagnoses of falls resulting in a vertebral fracture and dementia. Review of Resident #149's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) indicated the Resident was unable to complete the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and the staff had assessed him/her to have moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS also indicated Resident #149 required substantial to maximal assistance with self-care and mobility tasks. Review of the incident report dated 2/2/25…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-09 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status for one Resident (#12) out of a total sample of 23 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to a. obtain weekly weights to monitor the weight for Resident #12 as ordered and b. provide the dietary supplements as indicated by the Registered Dietitian. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Weight Management, dated and revised April 2019, indicated the following: - Weights will be obtained weekly X 4 after admission. Subsequent weights will be monthly, unless physician's orders or the resident's condition warrants more frequently as determined by the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT). - If a resident refuses weighing or circumstances prevent weighing the resident, the IDT will document the reason in the resident's medical record and care plan. Make attempt to weigh resident at another time. Resident #12 was admitted to the facility in January 2019 with diagnoses including…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-09 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, policy review, and record review, the facility failed to provide respiratory care services in accordance with professional standards of practice two Residents (#92, and #13) out of a total sample of 23 residents. Specifically: 1. For Resident #92, the facility failed to ensure oxygen was set to the level prescribed by the physician and maintain a clean filter on the oxygen concentrator; and 2. For Resident #13, the facility failed to ensure oxygen was set to the level prescribed by the physician. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Oxygen Administration, dated 1/2024, indicated the following: -Steps in procedure: 6. Adjust the oxygen delivery device so that it is comfortable for the resident and the proper flow of oxygen is being administered. - Preparation: Verify that there is a physician's order in place. Review the physician's orders or facility protocol for oxygen administration. 1. Resident #92 was admitted to the facility in August 2024 with diagnoses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-09 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide care and services consistent with professional standards of practice for one Resident (#13) who required renal dialysis (a life sustaining treatment that helps the body remove extra fluids and waste products from the blood when the kidneys are not able to) out of a total sample of 23 residents. Specifically, for Resident #13, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff documented they obtained blood pressures from his/her arm with the AV fistula (arteriovenous fistula, is when an artery and vein connect directly, allowing blood to flow. This term is interchangeably used with AV shunt.). Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Hemodialysis Access Care, dated and revised November 2017, indicated the following: - Guidelines: Steps in the procedure: 4. To prevent infection and/or clotting: Do not use access arm to take blood pressure. Resident #13 was admitted to the facility in January 2025 with diagnoses including end stage renal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-09 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive person-centered plan of care was developed for Trauma-Informed Care for two Residents (#57 and #88), who were admitted with the diagnosis of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), out of a total sample of 23 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Trauma Informed Care, dated October 2019, indicated: To guide staff in appropriate and compassionate care specific to individuals who have experienced trauma. Trauma-informed care is culturally sensitive and person-centered. Reduce or eliminate unnecessary stimuli. 1. Resident #57 was admitted to the facility in July 2023 with diagnoses that included Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, dementia, frontotemporal neurocognitive disorder, and depression. Review of Resident #57's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/27/25, indicated he/she scored a 00 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating severe cognitive impairments. Further…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-09 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (#8) was free from unnecessary psychotropic medications, out of a total sample of 23 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Psychotropic Medication, dated 7/2023, indicated the following: -To administer and monitor the effects of psychotropic medications when prescribed. Psychotropic medications will be prescribed at the lowest possible dosage and are subject to gradual dose reduction and re-review as needed. -Dosage is appropriate for the resident and is not in excess of the suggested daily dosage maximum, unless specifically documented by the attending physician. -The interdisciplinary team assesses and monitors the appropriateness, effectiveness, and side effects associated with psychotropic medications for each resident via resident care plan review period the resident, and one indicated, the family or responsible person, will be included in this process prior to the administration of dose. Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-09 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to follow the recommendations of the dentist to ensure a referral was made to the oral surgeon for one Resident (#92) out of a total sample of 23 residents. Findings include: Resident #92 was admitted to the facility in August 2024 with diagnoses including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). Review of Resident #92's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated the Resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of a possible 15, which indicated he/she is cognitively intact. The MDS also indicated Resident #93 required partial to moderate assistance with functional daily tasks. During an interview on 4/6/25 at 9:34 A.M., Resident #92 said he/she has been waiting to see the dentist. The Resident said he/she was supposed to have teeth pulled and have dentures made and no one from the facility has discussed this with him/her. Resident #92 was observed to have several small, broken and brown teeth…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-09 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide the prescribed, therapeutic diet for two Residents (#12, #4) out of a total sample of 23 Residents. Specifically: 1. For Resident #12, the facility failed to ensure the Resident was receiving Nectar Thickened Liquids as ordered. 2. For Resident #4, the facility failed to ensure that the Resident was receiving a Dysphagia Mechanical Soft diet and Nectar Thick Liquids as ordered. Findings include: 1. Resident #12 was admitted to the facility in January 2019 with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease dysphasia and Barrett's Esophagus without dysplasia. Review of Resident #12's most recent Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) indicated that the Resident has a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15 out of 15 indicting intact cognition. Further review of the MDS indicated that the Resident requires partial/moderate assistance with eating. The surveyor made the following observations: -…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to accurately document in the medical record for one Resident (#9) out of 23 total sampled residents. Specifically, for Resident #9, the facility failed to document presence of six bilateral foot wounds in weekly skin evaluations. Findings include: Resident #9 was admitted to the facility in November 2024 with diagnoses including diabetes and mild cognitive impairment. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/23/25, indicated Resident #9 had severe cognitive impairment as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 4 out of 15. This MDS indicated Resident #9 had two unstageable pressure ulcers. This MDS also indicated Resident #9 was unable to walk and was dependent on staff for turning in bed, hygiene, and transferred. Review of Resident #9's entire plan of care related to skin, revised 3/24/25, indicated the Resident had left and right heel arterial ulcers. The entire plan of care failed to indicate the Resident had any other wounds. On 4/7/25 at 10:36 A.M., the surveyor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, for Resident #9, the facility failed to ensure staff performed hand hygiene before applying and after removing gloves during wound care. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled 'Handwashing/Hand Hygiene', revised July 2024, indicated, but was not limited to the following: - Policy: The facility considers hand hygiene the primary means to prevent the spread of infections. 6. Use an alcohol-based hand rub containing at least 62% alcohol; or, alternatively, soap and water for the following situations: e. Before donning (applying) gloves. i. After handling used dressings, contaminated equipment, etc. j. After removing gloves. 8. The use of gloves does not replace hand washing/hand hygiene. Integration of glove use along with routine hand hygiene is recognized as the best practice for preventing healthcare-associated infections.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-03 · tag F0576 — pattern
    Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents on 3 of 3 units had access to the use of a telephone where calls can be made without being overheard. Findings include: During the Resident Group Interview on 4/2/24 at 2:00 P.M., all participating residents said that staff are unable to provide a telephone in private for Residents to make calls. Residents reported that the facility used to have a portable phone but now any residents who do not own their own cell phone, can only use the phone at the nurses station, where anyone can hear their conversations. Residents said this occurs on all units. On 4/3/24 at 8:18 A.M., the surveyors observed Resident #16 at the nurses station on the 2nd floor making a phone call. Resident #16 said that he/she used to be able to have the conversations with his/her family on a portable phone in his/her room but did not know where the portable phone went. On 4/3/24 at 10:13 A.M. the surveyor observed a resident at the nurses station on the 2nd floor making a phone call while staff and residents were in the area and could…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure resident centered care plans were developed and/or implemented for two Residents (#47, and #53) out of a total sample of 20 Residents. Specifically the facility failed to; 1.) develop a vision, communication and fall risk care plan for Resident #47, 2.) develop a pacemaker care plan for Resident #53. Findings include: A review of the facility's policy titled Care Plans, comprehensive Person-centered dated January 2024, indicated the following: -A comprehensive, person-centered care plan will be developed for each resident. The care plan will include objectives that meet the resident's physical, psychosocial, and functional needs is developed for each resident. Comprehensive care plan development includes: a. the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) in conjunction with the resident and his/her family or legal representative, may assist with the development of a comprehensive care plan for each resident. b. the care plan interventions are…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff stored all drugs and biologicals in accordance with accepted professional standards of practice. Specifically, 1. The facility failed to properly secure medications and medication carts on two of four units. 2. The facility failed to ensure medications were labeled and stored according to manufacturer's guidelines in two of four medication carts. Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Storage of Medications, revised 1/2024, indicated: -The facility shall store drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure, and orderly manner. 2. The nursing staff shall be responsible for maintaining medication storage and preparation areas in a clean, safe, and sanitary manner. 6. Compartments (including, but not limited to, drawers, cabinets, rooms, refrigerators, carts, and boxes) containing drugs and biologicals shall be locked when not in use. 1.) The surveyor made the following observations of medication carts left unlocked, unattended, and out of line of vision: -On 4/1/24 at 8:39 A.M., the surveyor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to store and prepare food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Food and Supply Storage, dated June 2018, indicated the following: - Food, non-food items, and supplies used in food preparation and service shall be stored in such a manner as to maintain safety and sanitation of food or supply for human consumption as outlined in the Federal Drug Administration Food Code, state regulations, and city county/health codes. - Discard food that exceeds their use by date or expiration date, is damaged, is spoiled, has the time and temperature danger zone requirements, or incorrectly stored such that it is unsafe or its safety is uncertain. During an initial tour of the kitchen on 4/1/24 at 7:05 A.M., the following was observed: *A container of cool whip that was opened and undated. The Top of the container was not fully secured and was loosely on the container. *A container of coleslaw with a discard date of 3/27/24. *A container of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-03 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to obtain consents for psychotropic medications explaining the risks and benefits of treatment, prior to administering psychotropic medication for two Residents (#47 and #76) out of a sample of 20 Residents. Findings include: A review of the facility's policy titled Psychotropic Medication, dated July 2023, indicated the following: -To administer and monitor the effects of psychotropic mediations when prescribed. The interdisciplinary team assesses and monitors the appropriateness, effectiveness, and side effects associated with psychotropic medications for each resident via resident care plan review. The resident, and when indicated, the family or responsible person, will be included in this process prior to the administration of dose. Psychotropic medication management includes: a. a physician's order and an appropriate diagnosis is required for psychotropic medications. b. a written informed consent from the resident (or legally authorized individual…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-03 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure advanced directives related to guardianships were valid and in place for two Residents, (#16 and #12) out of a total of 20 sampled Residents. Specifically: 1.) For Resident #16, the facility failed to ensure an established Guardianship was reviewed and renewed annually per court order, and; 2.) For Resident #12, the facility failed to establish a health care agent/representative when his/her activated health care proxy was no longer reachable or involved in his/her care. Findings include: 1. Resident #16 was admitted to the facility in June 2009 with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder, syncope, and bipolar disorder. Review of his/her most recent Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated Resident #16 scored 9 out of a possible 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status Exam, (BIMS), indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Review of the clinical record indicated Resident #16 had an established [NAME] Guardianship, (a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, policy review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (#31) was free from involuntary seclusion, out of a total sample of 20 Residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse: Prohibition, dated December 2017, indicated the following: -Each resident has the right to be free from verbal, sexual, physical and mental abuse, neglect, corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, and misappropriation of their property. Every resident in the facility will be treated with respect and dignity at all times. -Involuntary seclusion: the separation of a resident from other residents or from his/her room or confinement to his/her room (with or without roommates) against the resident's will, or the will of the resident's legal representative. Resident #31 was admitted to the facility in February 2024 with diagnoses including stroke with paralysis on right side and abnormalities of gait and mobility. Review of Resident #31's most recent Minimum Data…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-03 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, policy review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (#31) was free from restraints out of a total sample of 20 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to identify and assess the use of a pillow under a fitted sheet as a potential restraint for Resident #31. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Use of Restraints, dated 1/2024, indicated the following: -Restraints shall only be used for the safety and well-being of the resident(s) and only after other alternatives have been tried unsuccessfully. Restraints shall only be used to treat the resident's medical symptom(s) and never for discipline or staff convenience, or for the prevention of falls. -Physical restraints are defined as any manual method, physical or mechanical device, material or equipment attached or adjacent to the resident's body that the individual cannot remove easily, which restricts freedom of movement or restricts normal access to one's body. -The definition of a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-03 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility to ensure that services provided met professional standards for one Resident (#13), out of 20 total sampled Residents. Specifically, the facility failed to implement a daily wound dressing according to the physician's order for five days. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Medication and Treatment Orders, last revised April 2018, indicated: -Orders for medications and treatments will be consistent with regulatory standards. Review of the facility policy titled Dressings, Dry/Clean, revised April 2018, indicated: -Verify that there is a physician's order for this procedure. Resident #13 was admitted to the facility in December 2022 with diagnoses that included peripheral vascular disease and obesity. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/21/24, indicated that Resident #13 had moderate cognitive impairment as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 out of 15. This MDS indicated Resident #13 had an open lesion on his/her foot.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-03 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, policy review and interviews, the facility failed to provide assistance with meals for two Residents (#379 and #30) out of a total sample of 20 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), Supporting, dated September 2019, indicated the following: -Residents will be provided with care, treatment and services as appropriate to maintain or improve as able their ability to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs). -Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary for activities of daily living. -Appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADLs independently, with the consent of the resident and in accordance with the plan of care, including appropriate support and assistance with dining (melas and snacks). 1. Resident #379 was admitted to the facility in October 2023 with diagnoses including pneumonitis due to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-03 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, policy review and interviews, the facility failed to provide an activity program for three Residents (#31, #38 and #47) out of a total sample of 20 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Activity Evaluation, dated April 2019, indicated the following: -In order to promote the physical, mental and psychosocial well-being of residents, an activity evaluation is conducted and maintained for each resident at least quarterly and with any change of condition that could affect his/her participation in planned activities. -Each residence activities care plan relates to his/her comprehensive assessment and reflects his/her individual needs. -The activity evaluation is used to develop individual activities care plan (Separate from or as part of the comprehensive care plan) that will allow the resident to participate in activities of his/her choice and interest. 1. Resident #31 was admitted to the facility in February 2024 with diagnoses including stroke with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-03 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review an interview, the facility failed to follow up on a referral for ophthalmology services for one Resident (#12) out of a total of 20 sampled Residents. Findings include: Resident #12 was admitted to the facility in February 2016 with diagnoses including Wernicke's encephalon, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and alcohol dependence. Review of Resident #12's most recent Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated he/she scored 8 out of a possible 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status Exam, indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS also indicated he/she requires physical assistance from staff with bathing, dressing and toileting. During an interview on 4/1/24 at 7:59 A.M., Resident #12 said he/she wants to be seen by an eye doctor and wants glasses. Review of Resident #12's optometry notes indicated: - 11/8/23: Assessment: Glaucoma suspect, Cataract nuclear, [right] eye. Plan: Cataract surgery recommended. Referral: ophthalmology consult. - 3/8/24: Assessment:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-03 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure respiratory care was provided consistent with professional standards of care for one Resident (#4) out of a sample of 20 residents. Specifically for Resident #4, the facility to ensure oxygen was administered in accordance with the physician's orders. Findings Include: Review of facility policy titled Oxygen Administration, revised January 2024, indicated to review the physician's orders for oxygen administration and to evaluate oxygen saturation. Resident #4 was admitted to the facility in March 2018 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, a chronic inflammatory lung disease that causes obstructed airflow from the lungs) and weakness. Review of Resident #4's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/7/24, indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 out of 15 indicating that Resident #4 is cognitively intact. The MDS assessment failed to indicate the use of oxygen. On 4/1/24 at 7:52 A.M., the surveyor observed Resident #4 lying in bed,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-03 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure services consistent with professional standards of practice related to hemodialysis (the process of cleansing the blood by passing it through a special machine, necessary when the kidneys are unable to filter the blood) were provided for one Resident (#65) out of a total sample of 20 residents. Specifically, for Resident #65 the facility failed to ensure: 1. That a plan of care was developed for his/her AV (aterio-venous) Fistula (dialysis access site). 2. That emergency supplies were at the bedside in accordance with the physician's orders. Findings Include: Review of facility policy titled Hemodialysis Access Care, revised November 2017, indicated: care of an AV Fistula includes but is not limited to checking the patency of the site at regular intervals by checking for bruit and thrill (to ensure blood flow through the access site), and monitoring the site for bleeding. Resident #65 was admitted to the facility in November 2023…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-03 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on Record review and interviews the facility failed to act upon irregularities identified in the pharmacist's Medication Regimen Review (MRR) for one Resident (#76) out of a sample of 20 residents. Findings include: Resident #76 was admitted to the facility in March 2024 with diagnoses that included end stage renal disease, anxiety and left leg above the knee amputation. Review of Resident #76 most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/10/24, indicated he/she was unable to participate in the Brief Interview for Mental Status Exam and was assessed by staff as being severely cognitively impaired. Review of Resident #76's physician's orders, dated 3/19/24, indicated Ativan (a psychotropic medication used to treat anxiety) 0.5 milligrams every four hours as needed. Review of Resident #76's medical record indicated a pharmacist recommendation dated 3/18/24 with the following recommendation regarding physician's orders for Ativan as needed: PRN [as needed] orders for psychotropic medications are limited to 14 days. If the prescribing practitioner believes it is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-03 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure that PRN [as needed] ordered psychotropic drugs were limited to 14 days for one Resident (#76) out of a total sample of 20 residents. Specifically, for Resident #76 the facility failed to ensure a 14 day stop date for a PRN Ativan (a psychotropic medication used to treat anxiety) order. Findings Include: Resident #76 was admitted to the facility in March 2024 with diagnoses that included end stage renal disease, anxiety and left leg above the knee amputation. Review of Resident #76 most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/10/24, indicated he/she was unable to participate in the Brief Interview for Mental Status Exam and was assessed by staff as being severely cognitively impaired. Review of Resident #76's physician's orders, dated 3/19/24, indicated: Ativan 0.5 milligrams every four hours as needed. The Ativan order failed to indicate a stop date for the medication. Review of Resident #76's March and April 2024 Medication Administration Record indicated that PRN Ativan had been administered on 3/22/24.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-03 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, policy review and interviews, the facility failed to maintain accurate medical records for three Residents (#31, #13, and #76) out of a total sample of 20 Residents. Specifically: 1) For Resident #31, the facility inaccurately documented the Resident had been transferred out of bed. 2) For Resident #13, the facility documented a daily wound dressing as completed, when it was not completed according to the physician's order for five days; and 3) For Resident #76 the facility failed to accurately document skin assessments on the weekly skin evaluation. Findings include: 1. Resident #31 was admitted to the facility in February 2024 with diagnoses including stroke with paralysis on right side and abnormalities of gait and mobility. Review of Resident #31's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated the Resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8 out of a possible 15, which indicated he/she had moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS also…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-02-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — widespread
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a comfortable home like environment on 2 of 2 Resident units. Findings include: During observations on 2/5/23 at 8:16 A.M., the surveyor observed the following on the 2nd floor nursing unit: room [ROOM NUMBER] Bathroom: There was a hole in the wall above the sink. The water faucet on the left was stuck in the on position but no water was coming out. room [ROOM NUMBER]: There was no functional heat system. The Residents had to be moved out of the room as the outdoor temperatures had been below 0 degrees Fahrenheit. During an interview with the Maintenance Director on 2/6/23 at 2:44 P.M., he said that he was not aware that the heat was not working in room [ROOM NUMBER]. During observations on 2/7/23 at 7:49 A.M., the surveyor observed the following: room [ROOM NUMBER]: There were gouges on the bathroom door. The thermostat on the wall was missing a plate cover. There were patches of plaster without paint on the wall behind the door and the overbed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-07 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to provide a dignified existence for 5 Residents (#49, #44, #10, #1 and #36) out of a total sample of 24 Residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Resident Rights and dated as last revised November 2017 indicated that all employees shall treat residents with kindness, respect and dignity. 1. For Resident #49 the facility failed to assist with eating in a dignified manner. Resident #49 was admitted to the facility in February 2020 with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder and metabolic encephalopathy. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated that Resident #49 requires an extensive assist with eating. On 2/5/23, at 8:57 A.M., the surveyor observed Resident #49 lying in bed with a meal tray on an over the bed table at the end of Resident #49's bed. During an interview on 2/5/23, at 8:57 A.M. Resident #49 said he/she was very hungry. On 2/5/23, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-07 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — pattern
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure 4 Residents (#19, #34 #49 and #44) were free from restraints out of a total sample of 24 residents. Specifically for Residents # 19, #34, #49 and #44 the facility failed to assess the use of 1/2 siderails as a potential restraint. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled 'Use of Restraints' and dated as last revised 11/2019, indicated: *Restraints shall only be used for the safety and well-being of the resident(s) and only after other alternatives have been tried unsuccessfully. *Physical restraints are defined as any manual method or physical or mechanical device, material or equipment attached or adjacent to the resident's body that the individual cannot remove easily *If the device restricts a resident from changing position or place it is considered a restraint. *Prior to placing a device that could act as a restraint, a pre-restraining assessment will be completed. Review of the facility's Proper Use of Side Rails…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to develop and implement the plans of care for 5 Residents (#46, #1,#36, #42, and #61), out of a total of 24 sampled Residents. Findings include: 1.) For Resident #46, the facility failed to implement physician's orders regarding the use of ace wraps his/her edema. Resident #46 was admitted to the facility in May 2020 with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis affecting the left non-dominant side. Review of his/her most recent Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) completed on 11/24/22 indicated a score of 15 out of a possible 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating intact cognition. During an observation on 2/5/23 at 8:16 A.M., Resident #46 was observed in bed with kerlix (gauze rolls used for wound care) wrapped around his/her legs with socks on to hold the kerlix in place. Resident #46 told the surveyor that he/she is supposed to have ace wraps on both his/her legs every morning. During an observation on 2/6/23…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-02-07 · tag F0700 — pattern
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to obtain consent for the use of siderails prior to their installation for 4 sampled Residents (#44, #19, #34 and #49) out of a total of 24 sampled Residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's Proper Use of Side Rails Policy, with a revised date of 4/4/19 indicated: *Before the use of side rails, the staff shall inform the resident and/or legal representative about the benefits and potential hazards associated with siderails. Observations throughout the survey revealed that the siderails the facility uses act as a 1/4 siderail when in the up position. The 1/4 side siderails in the down position acts as a 1/2 siderail as the rail remained above the mattress. 1. Resident #44 was admitted to the facility in December 2022 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, falling and anxiety. Review of his/her most recent Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] indicated he/she is severely cognitively impaired and is totally dependent on staff for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility failed to 1. store medications securely for 1 Resident (#2) and 2. label medications appropriately in 1 of 1 medication rooms and 2 of 2 medication carts. Findings include: 1. Resident #2 was admitted to the facility in May 2017 with diagnoses including asthma, schizoeffective disorder and anxiety disorder. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], indicated that Resident #2 scored a 15 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status exam indicating that Resident #2 is cognitively intact. Further review indicated Resident #2 requires supervision for activities of daily living. Review of the doctor's orders dated February 2023 indicated an order for ProAir HFA Aerosol Solution 108 (90 base) MCG/ACT (albuterol Sulfate HFA) 2 puffs inhale orally every 4 hours as needed for SOB/WHEEZE. Further review indicated an order for Flovent HFA Aerosol 220 MCG/ACT (Fluticasone Propionate HFA) 2 puffs inhale orally two times a day, rinse mouth out…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and policy review the facility failed to maintain proper sanitation practices related to 1.) food storage, and 2.) food handling. Findings include: 1) Review of the facility policy titled, Food and Supply Storage, revised June 2018 indicated the following: *Food, non-food items, and supplies used in food preparation and services shall be stored in such a manner as to maintain safety and sanitation of the food or supply for human consumption as outlined in the Federal Drug Administration Food Code, state regulations, and city/county health codes. *Food and food supplies are stored to minimize exposure to splash, dust, or other contamination. *Refrigerated Time/Temperature Control for Safety (TCS), ready to eat foods (foods which are especially susceptible to encourage the growth of bacteria that can cause sickness if consumed, such as Eggs, Dairy, Meat products, and cooked vegetables) prepared on site that is held longer than 24 hours should be properly labeled with the common name, the preparation date (day 1), and use by date (maximum 7 days).…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-07 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain an accurate medical record for 4 Residents (#49, #1, #36, and #64) out of a total sample of 24 Residents. Findings include: 1. Resident #49 was admitted to the facility in February 2020 with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder and metabolic encephalopathy. On 2/5/23, at 7:50 A.M., the surveyor observed Resident #49 lying in bed with a dry protective dressing on his/her left upper arm. During an interview on 2/5/23, at 7:50 A.M.,Resident #49 said that the dressing on his/her left upper arm was because of dialysis. Review of the doctor's orders dated February 2023 indicated that Resident #49 receives dialysis Tuesdays, Thursdays and Saturdays. Further review indicated 2 different orders for checking the function of the arteriovenous (AV) fistula created for Resident #49 to receive dialysis. 1. AV Fistula: X Brachial R check thrill and bruit each shift. Document + if present, - if not present every shift. 2. Check bruit and thrill on left arm notify NP/MD with changes to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to wear Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) appropriately to prevent the potential spread of infection on 2 out of 3 units. Findings include: On 2/5/23, at 8:00 A.M., the surveyor observed Certified Nurse's Aide (CNA) #5 in the hallway of the first floor unit with her mask beneath her nose standing next to and talking to another CNA. On 2/6/23 at 7:59 A.M., the surveyor observed a CNA walking down the hallway on the second floor, wearing gloves and holding bag of soiled linen. The surveyor then observed the CNA to open the door to the soiled linen cute, remove her gloves in the hallway and without performing hand hygiene entered the dining area. On 2/7/23, at 8:17 A.M., the surveyor observed a CNA walking down hallway on the second floor wearing gloves and carrying dirty linen. On 2/07/23, at 11:25 A.M., the surveyor and the Infection Control Nurse, observed Certified nurse's Aide #5 walking down the hallway on the first floor with 2 gloves on carrying a clean shirt and a protective brief. The surveyor also observed CNA #5…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-07 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review and interviews the facility failed to ensure that one Resident (#2D) out of a total sample of 16 residents, whose right to be informed of, and participate in his/her treatment plan, was not honored when his/her activated Health Care Agent, declined the administration of an antidepressant and antipsychotic medication and despite the Health Care Agent signed a refusal, the facility continued to administer the antidepressant and antipsychotic medication. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Psychoactive Medication, dated as revised April 2018, indicated: - an informed consent from the resident or legally authorized individual in the case of resident incompetence is required for administration of psychoactive medications. Resident #2D was admitted to the facility in February 2023 with diagnoses including cognitive impairment, dementia and glaucoma. Review of the Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated that Resident #2D was rarely understood.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-07 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure 1 Resident (#2) was assessed for the ability to self administer medications out of a total sample of 24 Residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled 'Safety and Supervision of Residents', dated as last revised April 2018, indicated that Residents have the right to self-administer medications if the interdisciplinary team has determined that it is clinically appropriate and safe for the resident to do so. Further review indicated that the staff and practitioner will periodically (for example, during quarterly MDS reviews) reevaluate a Resident's ability to continue to self-administer medications. Resident #2 was admitted to the facility in May 2017 with diagnoses including asthma, schizoaffective disorder and anxiety disorder. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], indicated that Resident #2 scored a 15 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status exam indicating that Resident #2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-07 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete a significant change Minimum Data Set assessment for 1 Resident (#1) out of a total sample of 24 Residents. Finding include: Resident #1 was admitted in October 2004 with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis, dysphagia and obstructive uropathy. Review of Resident #1's significant change in status Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 12/14/22, indicated he/she was not receiving hospice care. Review of the physician's order, dated 10/6/22, indicated hospice consult evaluation and treatment. Review of long term care status form, dated 10/11/22, indicated Resident #1 was admitted to hospice services. Review of the Nursing Note, dated 10/11/22, indicated Resident #1 signed onto hospice services. During an interview on 2/7/23 at 10:49 A.M., the Director of Clinical Reimbursement said that Resident #1's significant change in status MDS was not completed. The Director of Clinical Reimbursement said that the assessment should have been completed within 14 days of his/her change in status.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-07 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to accurately complete a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for 1 Resident (#1) out of a total sample of 24 Residents. Specifically, for Resident #1, the facility failed to accurately code a) hospice services and b) antibiotic use. Findings include: Resident #1 was admitted in October 2004 with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis, dysphagia and obstructive uropathy. Review of Resident #1's significant change in status Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/14/22, indicated he/she was not receiving hospice services and he/she received an antibiotic for 7 days. a) Review of the MDS dated [DATE], indicated he/she was not receiving hospice services. Review of the physician's order dated 10/6/22 indicated a hospice consult evaluation and treatment. Review of the long term care status form, dated 10/11/22 indicated Resident #1 was admitted to hospice services. Review of the nursing note, dated 10/11/22, indicated Resident #1 signed onto…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to revise the plan of care for 2 Residents (#34 and #1) out of a total sample of 24 Residents. Findings include: 1. For Resident #34 the facility failed to revise a care plan for the level of assistance Resident #34 requires with eating. Resident #34 was admitted to the facility in June 2015 with diagnoses including quadriplegia, stroke and dementia. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated that Resident #34 scored an 9 out of 15 on the Brief interview for Mental Status exam indicating Resident #34 has moderate cognitive impairment. Further review indicated that Resident #34 requires continual supervision with one person physical assist for eating. Review of the current care plan with the Focus of ADL (Activities of Daily Living) Function, Eating; (intervention dated 2/2/22) - varies from continual supervision to total assist-resident is non-compliant with diet texture; provide education. On 2/5/23, at 8:57…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-07 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide the required supervision of activities of daily living (ADLs) for one Resident #10 out of a sample of 24 Residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), Supporting revised September 2019 indicated the following: *Appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADLs independently with the consent of the resident and in accordance with the plan of care, including appropriate support and assistance with dining (meals and snacks). Resident #10 was admitted to the facility in June 2020 with diagnoses including dysphagia and dementia. The most recent minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 4 out of a possible 15 indicating severe impairment. During an observation on 2/5/23 at 8:32 A.M., the surveyor observed Resident #10 in his/her room alone, eating his/her breakfast meal. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide assistance with grooming for 2 Residents (#32 and #5) out of a total sample of 24 Residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Activities of Daily Living, dated as revised September 2019, indicated the following: *Appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently, with the consent of the resident and in accordance with the plan of care, including appropriate support and assistance with hygiene (bathing, dressing, grooming, and oral care). 1. Resident #32 was admitted in March 2020 with diagnoses including diabetes. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated Resident #32 scored a 14 out of a possible 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), which indicated the Resident is cognitively intact. The MDS also indicated that Resident #32 requires one person physical assistance for personal hygiene. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviewed and interviews, for 1 of 24 sampled Residents (#36), the facility failed to ensure nursing provided care and services that met professional standards of practice, related to monitoring and identifying changes in skin. Specifically, when nursing did not complete comprehensive weekly skin assessments and there was no documentation to support when a pressure injury developed to Resident #36's left heel. Findings include: Resident #36 was admitted to the facility in February 2022 with diagnoses including dementia, dysphagia and post-traumatic stress disorder. Review of Resident #36's quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated , 11/2/22, indicated that he/she did not have behaviors, he/she required assistance for bed mobility and dressing, and had a history of weight loss. Review the physician's order, dated 2/10/22, indicated for nursing to conduct a weekly skin check every evening on Thursdays. Review of the medical record indicated that on 10/6/22 nursing completed a comprehensive skin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to complete a fall evaluation for one (Resident #10) out of a sample of 24 Residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Falls and fall risk, managing last revised April 2018 indicated the following: *A fall is defined as unintentionally coming to rest on the ground, floor or other lower level, but not as a result of an overwhelming external force. A fall without injury is still a fall, unless there is evidence suggesting otherwise, when a resident is found on the floor, a fall is considered to have occurred. *If the resident continues to fall, staff will re-evaluate the situation and whether it is appropriate to continue or change current interventions. As needed, the attending physician will help the staff reconsider possible causes that may not previously have been identified. Resident #10 was admitted to the facility in June 2020 with diagnoses including paranoid schizophrenia, and dementia. Review of Resident #10's Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed on 10/26/22 indicated he/she scored 4 out of a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-07 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure for 2 Residents (#13 and #49) out of a sample of 2 Residents receiving dialysis care and services, were consistent with professional standards of practice. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure ongoing communication and collaboration with the dialysis center. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled End-Stage Renal Disease, Care of a Resident with' dated as last revised 11/2017, indicated that residents with end stage renal disease (ESRD) will be cared for according to currently recognized standards of care. Further review indicated that the contracted ESRD and the facility will agree on how information will be exchanged between the facilities to manage all aspects of the resident's care. 1. Resident #13 was admitted to the facility in January of 2018 with diagnoses including end stage renal disease, anemia, severe protein-calorie malnutrition and paranoid schizophrenia. Review of the medical record indicated that Resident #13 receives dialysis services every Tuesday, Thursday and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-07 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that pharmacy recommendations were reviewed and addressed by the attending physician for 1 sampled Resident (#44) out of a total of 24 sampled Residents. Findings include: Resident #44 was admitted to the facility in December 2022 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, falling and anxiety. Review of his/her most recent Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] indicated he/she is severely cognitively impaired and is totally dependent on staff for bathing, dressing and eating. Review of the monthly pharmacist recommendation to Resident #44's physician for the month of January 2023 indicated the following: Resident #44 is currently ordered for the following PRN psychotropic Medication: Lorazepam Concentrate: 2 MG/ML - .5 mg sublingually every 4 hours as needed for increased anxiety Please review this PRN order and consider if d/c is appropriate or document continued need for therapy and specify stop date. There was no indication in the clinical record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-07 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an as needed (PRN) anti-anxiety medication was limited to 14 day use for 1 sampled Resident (#44) out of a total of 24 sampled Residents. Findings include: Resident #44 was admitted to the facility in December 2022 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, falling and anxiety. Review of his/her most recent Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] indicated he/she is severely cognitively impaired and is totally dependent on staff for bathing, dressing and eating. Review of Resident #44's physician's orders indicated the following: record indicated an order for Lorazepam Concentrate, 2 MG/ML/ give .5 mg sublingually every 4 hours as needed for increased anxiety, 12/29/22. (An anti anxiety medication). Review of Resident #44's Medication Administration Records dated December 2022, January 2023 and February 2023 indicated Resident #44 received 9 doses of Lorazepam. During an interview with Corporate Nurse #1, the Director of Nursing, and the Administrator…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-07 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure it was free from a medication error rate of greater than 5 percent. Two of five nurses observed made 3 errors in 33 opportunities on one of three units resulting in a medication error rate of 9.09%. These errors impacted 2 Residents (#11 and #7) out of 6 residents observed. Finding include: Review of the facility policy titled , Administering Medications dated as revised 2/2020, indicated medications will be administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. -Medications will be administered in accordance with prescriber order, including any required time frame. -Medications are administered within one hour before or after their prescribed times. *During the medication administration pass on the C- Unit on 2/5/23 at 10:28 A.M., the surveyor observed Nurse #4 prepare medications for Resident #11 including: - clonazepam 0.5 milligrams (mg), 1 tablet - tramadol 50 mg, 1 tablet Review of Resident #11's active physician's orders, dated 6/17/21, indicated: -tramadol tablet 50 mg, administer 50 mg by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$49,324 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $49,324 — penalty dated 2025-04-09

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to NEXT STEP HEALTHCARE — 14 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 51.7-0.7 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 51.9-0.9 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.6+0.4 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 52.2-0.2 vs chain
The other 13 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.7★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
DELL'ANNO, DAMIANIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/01/2017
STEPHAN, WILLIAMIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/01/2017
NEXT STEP HEALTHCARE LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2017
LIKHI, RISHIIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/16/2024
MUBIRU, HENRYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/27/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-4.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$411K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 58%Medicare 3%Other / private 39%

This home reported $411K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$341per resident / day
operating cost
$10,370per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$325per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Massachusetts Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Massachusetts
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,817/mo
Nursing home (private)
$9,600/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 225329. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-09, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next