Oakhill Healthcare
76 North Street, Middleboro, MA 02346 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 123 certified beds · (508) 947-4774 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (45) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 11.3% | 16.4% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.0% | 5.1% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.6% | 0.8% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.5% | 1.8% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 3.3% | 15.5% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 2.4% | 0.1% | 0.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.1% | 3.4% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 11.9% | 15.4% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 23.5% | 19.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 94.3% | 94.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.7% | 4.2% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 25.5% | 21.2% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 35.9% | 21.4% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.0% | 1.4% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 73.9% | 77.7% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 24.4% | 25.7% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 24.1% | 11.9% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.36 | 1.88 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.60 | 1.50 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
43.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 124 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 52.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 59 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.13 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 9% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 43.5%CMS range 35.7–53.5 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.9%CMS range 9.2–16.0 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 52.5% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 37.3% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 33.9% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 96.4% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 3.6% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 10.3%CMS range 6.8–15.6 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.09 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 123 beds and averages 88.9 residents a day — about 72% occupied, or roughly 34 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.51 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.54 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.04 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.28 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.60 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.60 to 0.42 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
45 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 35 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1) who required the use of a mechanical lift with the assistance of two staff members for transfers, the Facility failed to ensure he/she was provided with the appropriate assistive device (correct size mechanical lift sling/pad) in order to maintain his/her safety during a transfer, when Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1 and CNA #2 used a sling pad that was too big for him/her, Resident #1 slid out of the sling pad during the transfer, fell to the floor, and was transferred to the Hospital Emergency Department (ED) for an evaluation. Findings Include: Review of the Facility's Policy titled, Safe Lifting and Movement of Residents, dated as revised May 2018, indicated the following: -in order to protect the safety and well-being of staff and residents, and to promote quality care, this facility uses appropriate techniques and devices to lift and move residents.-staff responsible for direct resident care will be trained in the use…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents had a homelike environment. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure Resident #1's fall mats and walls were in good repair and clean; and 2. Ensure residents on the B-Unit and C-Unit had an environment that was in good repair and homelike.Findings include: 1. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility in August of 2018 with diagnoses including cerebrovascular accident (stroke).Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 10/16/25, indicated on the staff assessment for mental status the Resident has a short-term and long-term memory impairment.On 12/30/25 at 7:59 A.M., the surveyor observed the following in Resident #1's room:- Resident #1 in bed with a ripped fall mat with approximately a 6-inch by 14-inch area of stained foam exposed on the left side of the Resident's bed.-Two missing floor tiles on the right side of the bed-An area of the wall with brown stains approximately two and a half feet in width.The surveyor made the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-06 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice for one Resident (#27), out of a total sample of 19 residents, when they did not implement a physician's order for referral to psychiatric services following a monthly medication regimen review. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Regimen Review, dated 8/2020, indicated but was not limited to the following:- resident specific irregularities and/or clinically significant risks resulting from or associated with medications are documented in the resident's active medical record and reported to the Director of Nurses (DON), Medical Director, and or prescriber, as appropriate- recommendations are acted upon and documented by the facility staff and/or the prescriber Review of [NAME], Manual of Nursing Practice 11th edition, dated 2019, indicated the following:-The professional nurse's scope of practice is defined and outlined by the State Board of Nursing that governs practice. Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-06 · tag F0825 — patternProvide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that specialized rehabilitation services were provided to assist in maintaining the highest practicable level functioning for one Resident (#33), out of a total sample of 19 residents. Findings include: Review of the Rehabilitation Consultant Company policy titled Policy: 8.1 - Evaluations, revised 7/21/25, indicated but was not limited to the following:POLICY:-all patients identified as needing an assessment of functional status or assessment of indicators impacting quality of life and having potential to benefit from rehabilitation, habilitative, and/or skilled functional maintenance therapy be evaluated to determine an appropriate plan of care;-an evaluation is an assessment of the patient's physical and functional status used to determine if Physical Therapy (PT), Occupational Therapy (OT), or Speech Therapy (ST) services are medically necessary, gather baseline data including objective findings, and establish a treatment plan with reasonable and attainable goals to be targeted within a defined time…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-06 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff maintained accurate medical records for three Residents (#2, #87, #91), out of a total sample of 19 residents. Specifically, the facility failed:1. For Resident #2, to ensure the Resident's active Physician's Orders accurately reflected the Resident's advance directives as indicated on the Resident's Massachusetts Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (MOLST);2. For Resident #87, to ensure information regarding a potential resident-to-resident altercation and follow up assessment and intervention were documented; and3. For Resident #91, to document information of an assessment on a potential cause for hospitalization or change in condition for Resident #91 prior to their transportation to the emergency room (ER). Findings include:1. Resident #2 was admitted to the facility in September 2025 with diagnoses including atrial fibrillation. Review of Resident #2's MOLST indicated the following: Do not resuscitate, use non-invasive ventilation,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-06 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed for one Resident (#7), out of a total sample of 19 residents, to notify the physician of a significant weight loss of 11 percent over 90 days, that was unplanned and unexpected. Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Nutrition, dated as revised 6/2018, indicated but was not limited to the following: - the Physician is notified and consulted when there is a significant change in the resident's nutritional status Review of the facility's policy titled Change in a Resident's condition or status, dated as revised 7/2024, indicated but was not limited to the following: - the facility professional staff will communicate with physician's regarding changes in condition as warranted- the Nurse will notify the resident's provider or on call provider when there has been a change in resident condition (not limited to)-significant change in the resident's physical condition Resident #7 was admitted to the facility in August 2025 and had diagnoses including: Enterocolitis due to clostridium difficile (C. diff), obesity…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-06 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure for one Resident (#2), out of a total sample of 19 residents, that the Resident was free from chemical restraints. Specifically, the facility failed to address a recommended gradual dose reduction (GDR) of his/her physician's ordered Risperidone (antipsychotic medication). Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Psychotropic Medication, last revised 7/23, indicated but was not limited to the following:-psychoactive medications will be prescribed at the lowest possible dosage and are subject to gradual dose reduction and re-review as needed.-A physician's order and an appropriate diagnosis is required for psychotropic medicationResident #2 was admitted to the facility in September 2025 with diagnoses including dementia. Review of the current Physician's Orders indicated Resident #2 had an order for Risperidone oral tablet 1 milligram (MG) with instructions to give 1 MG by mouth twice daily.Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 9/5/25, indicated Resident #2 was taking an antipsychotic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-06 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed for one Resident (#87), out of a total sample of 19 residents, to implement their abuse policy and procedure when there was a report of potential sexual abuse on 12/25/25. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse Investigation and Reporting, dated as revised 2/2024, indicated but was not limited to the following:-each resident has the right to be free from verbal, sexual, physical, and mental abuse, neglect, corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, and misappropriation of their property-the facility administrator will be the abuse prevention coordinatorDefinitions:Sexual abuse: any nonconsensual sexual contact. Includes but is not limited to sexual harassment, sexual coercion, or sexual assault of a resident.Identification and reporting:-to proactively identify any event that may be potential abuse, neglect, involuntary seclusion, or misappropriation of resident property and properly report that event to the appropriate agencies-each facility shall report to the Department suspected…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-06 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and review of the Healthcare Facility Reporting System (HCFRS), the facility failed for one Resident (#87), out of a total sample of 19 residents, to report an alleged violation of potential sexual abuse within 24 hours as required under the Elder Justice Act. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse Investigation and Reporting, dated as revised 2/2024, indicated but was not limited to the following:-each resident has the right to be free from verbal, sexual, physical, and mental abuse, neglect, corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, and misappropriation of their property-the facility administrator will be the abuse prevention coordinatorDefinitions:Sexual abuse: any nonconsensual sexual contact. Includes but is not limited to sexual harassment, sexual coercion, or sexual assault of a resident.Identification and reporting:-to proactively identify any event that may be potential abuse, neglect, involuntary seclusion, or misappropriation of resident property and properly report that event to the appropriate agencies-each facility shall…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-06 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate allegations of sexual abuse for one Resident (#87), out of a total sample of 19 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse Investigation and Reporting, dated as revised 2/2024, indicated but was not limited to the following:-each resident has the right to be free from verbal, sexual, physical, and mental abuse, neglect, corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, and misappropriation of their property-the facility administrator will be the abuse prevention coordinatorDefinitions:Sexual abuse: any nonconsensual sexual contact. Includes but is not limited to sexual harassment, sexual coercion, or sexual assault of a resident.Identification and reporting:-to proactively identify any event that may be potential abuse, neglect, involuntary seclusion, or misappropriation of resident property . Alleged violations are thoroughly investigated and must prevent further potential abuse while the investigation is in process. The result of the investigations must be reported in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 35 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-06 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide indwelling catheter (a flexible tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine outside of the body) care and management consistent with professional standards for one Resident (#65), out of a total sample of 19 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the Foley catheter was positioned below the bladder draining with the flow of gravity.Findings include:Resident #65 was admitted to the facility in October 2024 with diagnoses including benign prostatic hyperplasia and malignant neoplasm of right kidney.Review of Resident #65's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated the Resident had an indwelling catheter.Review of Resident #65's current Physician's Orders indicated but was not limited to the following:Foley Cath care every shift, dated 10/25/24, indefinite. Review of Resident #65's care plan indicated the following:-The Resident has an indwelling catheter, dated 11/7/24.-The Resident will not develop any complications associated with catheter usage through the next review, revision dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications with a shortened expiration date were properly labeled once opened, in one medication cart out of three medication carts observed.Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Storage Medications, dated as revised 8/2024, indicated but was not limited to the following:-Medications and biologicals are stored safely, securely, and properly, following manufacturer's recommendations.-Certain medications or package types, ophthalmic (eye drops) require an expiration date shorter than the manufacturer's expiration date once opened to ensure medication purity and potency.-When the manufacturer has specified a usable duration after opening (i.e. beyond use date), the nurse shall place a date opened sticker on the medication and record the date opened and the new date of expiration.On 12/31/25 at 3:33 P.M., the surveyor observed the medication cart with Nurse #4 on Unit C Side 1 and made the following observations:Three bottles of Cosopt (used to treat increased pressure inside the eye) eye drops, for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice for food safety and sanitation to prevent the potential spread of foodborne illness to residents who are at high risk. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure:1. The main kitchen floor and walk-in refrigerator shelving were maintained in a sanitary and safe condition; and2. Labeling and dating of refrigerated items in two of four kitchenettes. Findings include: 1. Review of the 2022 Food Code by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), revised 1/2023, indicated but was not limited to the following: 3-305.11 (A) Except as specified in paragraphs (B) and (C) of this section, food shall be protected from contamination by storing the food (1) in a clean, dry location. 4-602.11 (D) Equipment is used for storage of packaged or unpackaged food such as a reach-in refrigerator and the equipment is cleaned at a frequency necessary to preclude accumulation of soil residues. 4-602.13 Nonfood-contact surfaces of equipment shall be cleaned at a frequency necessary to preclude accumulation of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment, and to help prevent the development and potential transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure proper hand hygiene after handling contaminated equipment and follow infection control standards while administering medications for two Residents (#15 and #44), out of five residents observed during medication administration.Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Administering Oral Medications, dated as revised 11/2025, indicated but was not limited to the following:-Perform hand hygiene-Select the drug from the medication cart-Perform hand hygieneReview of the facility's policy titled Handwashing/Hand Hygiene, dated as last revised 7/2024, indicated but was not limited to the following:-This facility considers hand hygiene the primary means to prevent the spread of infections.-All staff shall follow the handwashing/hand…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-06 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to voice and formulate grievances, have those grievances responded to promptly, and be provided a resolution to their grievance. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Have voiced grievances investigated and addressed, for two Residents (#86 and #68), out of a sample of 18 residents; and 2. Ensure residents had access to grievance/concern forms so they could formulate grievances anonymously, should they choose not to alert a staff member to their concern. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Grievances, dated as revised 12/2018, indicated but was not limited to the following: - it is the policy of this facility to make information on how to file a grievance available to residents and/or resident representatives - the facility will support the right of each resident to voice grievances and to ensure that after a grievance has been received, the grievance official (administrator or designee) will work collaboratively with team members to resolve the issue and provide…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-06 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on document review and interview the facility failed to ensure Section C (Cognitive patterns) of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was complete and accurate to reflect the status of seven Residents (#86, #250, #60, #17, #9, #55, #40), out of a sample of 18 current residents and one discharged Resident (#97), who also had an incomplete pain section (Section J), out of a sample of three discharged records reviewed. Findings include: -Resident #86 was admitted to the facility in June 2024 with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure with hypercapnia (buildup of carbon dioxide in the bloodstream). Review of the MDS assessment, dated 9/20/24, Section C indicated but was not limited to the following: C 0100: Should Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) be conducted: Yes Further review indicated questions C 0200 through C 0400 were not assessed, and there was no BIMS score to determine the Resident's level of cognition. -Resident #250 was admitted to the facility in October 2024 with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus. Review of the MDS assessment, dated 10/28/24,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-06 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure sufficient staffing to assure residents attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Specifically, the facility failed to have sufficient staffing on the weekends as indicated on the payroll-based journal (PBJ) report submitted to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) for Fiscal Year Quarter 3, 2024. Findings include: Review of the PBJ Staffing Data Report, CASPER Report 1705D FY Quarter 3, 2024 (April 1 - June 30) indicated the following: This Staffing Data Report identifies areas of concern that will be triggered (e.g., requires follow-up during the survey). -One Star Staffing Rating Triggered= Star Staffing Rating Equals 1 Excessively Low Weekend -Staffing Triggered = Submitted Weekend Staffing data is excessively low Review of the facility's healthcare Facility Assessment (FA), revised August 2024, indicated the following: Part 1: Resident Profile 1.1 Number of residents you are licensed to provide care for - 121 -Number of licensed beds on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice for food safety and sanitation to prevent the potential of foodborne illness to residents who are at high risk. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Handle ready to eat food (food which does not require cooking or further preparation prior to consumption) utilizing proper hand hygiene to prevent cross contamination (transfer of pathogens from one surface to another); and 2. Properly label and date food products, and maintain safe and clean equipment in two of three nourishment kitchenettes. Findings include: Review of the 2022 Food Code by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), revised 1/2023, indicated but was not limited to the following: - 3-301.11 Preventing Contamination from Hands. (A) FOOD EMPLOYEES shall wash their hands as specified under § 2-301.12. (B) Except when washing fruits and vegetables as specified under §3-302.15 or as specified in (D) and (E) of this section, FOOD EMPLOYEES may not contact exposed, READY-TO-EAT FOOD with their bare hands and shall use…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-06 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, document review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain accurate medical records in accordance with professional standards and practices for five Residents (#9, #15, #17, #55, and #10), out of 18 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #9, to obtain a matching Physician's order for advanced directives in the Resident's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) which accurately reflected his/her wishes as indicated on the Resident's Massachusetts Medical Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (MOLST) form; 2. For Resident #15, to obtain a matching Physician's order for advanced directives in the EMR which accurately reflected his/her wishes as indicated on the Resident's MOLST form; 3. For Resident #17, to ensure his/her medical records contained an active and current [NAME] Treatment Plan (court approved treatment plan for the administration of antipsychotic medications); 4. For Resident #55, to ensure that documentation of physician visits was part of the medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-06 · tag F0847 — patternInform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to explain binding arbitration agreements and provide the Residents or their responsible party with the right to fully review the agreement for two of two Residents (#60 and #92) that had signed Arbitration agreements in the facility. Findings include: During an interview on 11/3/24 at 9:34 A.M., the Administrator said the facility offered arbitration agreements, he was responsible for overseeing the arbitration agreement process and there were no residents currently residing in the facility that had ever signed an arbitration agreement. Review of the medical records for Resident #60 and Resident #92 on 11/4/24 indicated both Residents had a signed arbitration agreement in their records. During a follow up interview on 11/5/24 at 9:38 A.M., the Administrator said he is responsible for having the residents or their responsible party review and potentially sign the arbitration agreements in the facility at this time. He said there are not currently any resident in the facility who have a signed arbitration. He was made aware…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-06 · tag F0868 — patternHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to maintain a Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Committee which included the required members at their meetings. Specifically, the facility Medical Director failed to attend the last two quarterly QAPI meetings and the laboratory and pharmacy providers had not attended any of the four quarterly QAPI meetings throughout the year 2024. Findings include: Review of the facility provided QAPI Program Resource Guide, dated as revised 6/2019, indicated but was not limited to the following: - facility develops QAPI plans that are comprehensive, including all departments and all services offered by the facility - Leadership is accountable for fully engaging all members Review of the facility's QAPI calendar, last revised 6/2019, indicated the following people were expected to be in attendance quarterly: Medical Director, Administrator, Director of Nurses, Lab provider, MDS Nurse, Business office manager, Pharmacy provider, Medical records, Unit managers (if applicable) Review of the facility's QAPI Attendee…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on document review and interview, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program to help prevent the development and potential transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Residents #17 and #52, to ensure staff used appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) for enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) when providing care; and 2. To have a written water management plan and documentation to ensure a facility risk assessment was conducted to identify where Legionella (bacteria that can cause Legionnaires' disease, a serious type of pneumonia) and other opportunistic waterborne pathogens could grow and spread in the facility's water system. Findings include: 1. Review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) guidance titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions in Nursing Homes, dated 3/20/24, indicated but was not limited to: -Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) refer to an infection control intervention designed to reduce…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-06 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, for one Resident (#5), from a total sample of 18 residents, the facility failed to ensure staff documented pertinent information in the medical record including the discharge/transfer destination, reason for the discharge/transfer, a summary of the resident's current medical status and failed to ensure that necessary information was communicated to the receiving health care institution to ensure a safe and effective transition of care. Findings include: Resident #5 was admitted to the facility in July 2024 and had diagnoses including a history of urinary tract infections and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of the medical record indicated medication administration notes, dated: 7/27/24, 7/28/24, 7/29/24, 7/31/24, 8/1/24, 8/2/24, 8/3/24. 8/5/24 and 8/6/24 with only the acronym MLOA (Medical Leave of Absence). Further review of the medical record failed to indicate any documentation of the reason for the transfer to the hospital, which hospital the Resident was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-06 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on document review and interview, the facility failed to ensure two Residents (#250 and #60) were offered or provided a summary of their baseline care plans, out of a total sample of 18 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Care Plans - Baseline, dated as revised 11/2017, indicated but was not limited to the following: - the resident and their representative will be provided a summary of the baseline care plan that includes but is not limited to the initial goals of the resident, a summary of medications and dietary instructions, any services or treatments to be administered by the facility and personnel acting on behalf of the facility. 1. Resident #60 was admitted to the facility in October of 2024 with diagnoses including unspecified dementia, diabetes mellitus and hypertension. Review of the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), dated 10/23/24, indicated the Resident suffered from severe cognitive impairment with a score of 3 out of 15. Further review of the medical record indicated the Resident's healthcare proxy (HCP) was activated to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-06 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to review and revise the care plan for one Resident (#22), out of a total sample of 18 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the care plan was updated with current Health Care Proxy (HCP) status. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, last revised 1/2024, indicated but was not limited to: - Policy: a comprehensive, person-centered care plan will be developed for each resident. The care plan will include objectives that meet the resident's physical, psychosocial, and functional needs is developed for each resident. - the resident comprehensive care plan will identify problem areas and their causes as warranted and developing interventions that are targeted and meaningful to the resident. Review of the facility's policy titled Advanced Directives, last revised 1/2024, indicated but was not limited to: - Policy: Advanced Directives will be respected in accordance with state law and facility policy - Guidelines: The plan of care for each…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-06 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services consistent with professional standards of practice for three Residents (#95, #33, and #22), out of a total sample of 18 residents and three closed records. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: 1. For Resident #95, that the Registered Nurse (RN), who made a pronouncement of death, documented the assessment in the medical record as required; 2. For Resident #33, that all components of wound care recommendations were implemented timely and air mattress settings were in accordance with physician's orders; and 3. For Resident #22, that a physician's order was in place to transfer the Resident to the hospital. Findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled RN Pronouncement, last revised 11/2017, indicated but was not limited to: -Documentation in Nurses Notes by the Registered Nurse (RN) making the pronouncement should include: -Absence of respirations, apical pulse, and blood pressure -Time of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the environment was free from accident hazards for one Resident (#85), out of a total sample of 18 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to implement interventions on the comprehensive care plan to ensure safety precautions were taken for resident safety as related to smoking and complete an accurate initial and quarterly smoking evaluation. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Smoking Policy - Residents, dated last revised 3/2024, indicated but was not limited to the following: - This facility shall establish and maintain safe resident smoking practices. - Prior to, and upon admission, residents shall be informed of the facility smoking policy, including designated smoking areas and smoking times. - A resident's ability to smoke safely will be re-evaluated quarterly, upon a significant change (physical or cognitive) and as determined by staff. - The resident will be evaluated upon admission and/or when a resident chooses to smoke, to determine the resident's ability to smoke…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-06 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary respiratory care and services for one Resident (#22), out of a total sample of 18 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure oxygen (O2) equipment was maintained in a sanitary manner to help decrease the risk of potential contamination and infection. Findings include: Review of the User's Technical Manual, dated January 2019, for Resident #22's oxygen concentrator indicated but was not limited to: - Description of operations: - Air is drawn into the Oxygen Concentrator through an external air intake gross particulate filter. -Routine Maintenance - To ensure accurate output and efficient operation of the unit, the user must perform simple routine maintenance tasks: -Clean the air intake gross particle filter Review of the World Health Organization: Care, Cleaning and Disinfection of Oxygen Concentrators Checklist (2022) indicated: -Inspect and clean air intake filter (1-2 times per week) 1. Pull the filter…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-06 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a person-centered plan of care which included trauma informed approaches and identified triggers to avoid potential re-traumatization for two Residents (#39, #22) with a history of trauma, out of a total sample of 18 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Trauma Informed Care, dated last revised 10/2019, included but was not limited to: - Policy: to guide staff in appropriate and compassionate care specific to individuals who have experienced trauma. - Staff are provided in-service training about trauma, its impact on health, and post-traumatic stress disorder in the context of the healthcare setting. - Nursing staff are trained on screening tools, trauma assessment and how to identify triggers associated with re-traumatization. - Trauma informed care is culturally sensitive and person-centered. - As part of the comprehensive assessment, identify history of trauma or interpersonal violence when such information is provided to the facility. Identifying past trauma or adverse experiences…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-06 · tag F0712 — isolatedEnsure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one Resident (#55), out of 18 sampled residents, the facility failed to ensure the Resident was seen by the physician at least every 30 days for the first 90 days after admission and at least every 60 days thereafter, with alternate visits by a nurse practitioner as indicated. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Physician Services, last revised February 2020, indicated but was not limited to: - Policy: The medical care of each resident is under the supervision of a Licensed Physician. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: - The physician will perform pertinent, timely medical assessments; prescribe an appropriate medical regimen; provide adequate, timely information about the resident's condition and medical needs; visit the resident at appropriate intervals; and ensure adequate alternative coverage. - Physician visits, frequency of visits, emergency care of residents, etc., are provided in accordance with current regulations and facility policy. Resident #55 was admitted to the facility in January 2024 with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-06 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on document review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the monthly medication regimen review (MRR) for two Residents (#10 and #40), out of a total sample of 18 residents, were included in the medical record or readily available for review to indicate the Physician's response to the recommendations made by the Pharmacist and that recommendations for Resident #40 were acted upon in a timely manner. Findings include: 1. Resident #10 was admitted to the facility in August 2024 with diagnoses including sepsis (a severe whole-body infection), diabetes mellitus, and depression. Review of the medical record for Resident #10 indicated the Pharmacist had completed a MRR and indicated but was not limited to the following: 8/11/24: see report for recommendations 9/5/24: see report for recommendations 10/6/24: see report for recommendations 11/5/24: no irregularities or recommendations at this time During an interview on 11/6/24 at 9:29 A.M., Nurse #4 reviewed the medical record and said she could not locate any of the MRR pharmacy recommendation forms or reports indicating what…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-06 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure one Resident's (#40) drug regimen was free from unnecessary psychotropic medications, out of a total sample of 18 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure as needed antianxiety medications were limited to 14 days or extended beyond 14 days with a documented clinical rationale and duration. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Psychotropic Medication, dated last revised 7/2023, indicated but was not limited to the following: - Psychoactive medications will be prescribed at the lowest possible dosage and are subject to gradual dose reduction and re-review as needed. - A physician's order and an appropriate diagnosis is required for psychotropic medications. - Residents will not receive PRN (as needed) doses of psychotropic medications unless that medication is necessary to treat a specific condition or diagnosis that is documented in the clinical record. - The need to continue PRN orders for psychotropic medications beyond 14 days requires that the practitioner document the rational…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure all medications used in the facility were stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Provide a permanently affixed compartment and separate from all other medications for the storage of one schedule IV (low potential for misuse and dependence) and one schedule III (moderate to low potential for physical and psychological dependence) controlled substance in one of three medication room refrigerators reviewed; and 2. Ensure medications were not left unsecured when not in direct supervision of the licensed nurse. Findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled Storage of Controlled Substances, revised August 2020, indicated but was not limited to the following: -Schedule II through V medications subject to abuse or diversion are stored in either a permanently affixed, double locked compartment separate from all other medications or in accordance with state regulations. On 11/5/24 at 9:37 A.M., the surveyor reviewed the B Unit medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-22 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who had a court appointed Legal Guardian in place to make his/her health care decisions, the Facility failed to ensure his/her Guardian was promptly notified of changes in his/her medication administration and discontinuation of medications. Findings include: Review of the Facility's Policy titled, Change in a Resident's Condition or Status, dated as last revised 04/04/2019, indicated that the Facility professional staff will communicate with physician, participant, and family regarding changes in condition. The Policy further indicated that regardless of the resident's current mental or physical condition a nurse or healthcare provider will inform the resident/representative of any changes in his/her medical care or nursing treatment. Resident #1 was admitted to the Facility in October 2023, diagnoses included acute right-sided cerebral vascular accident (CVA, interruption of blood flow to the brain), seizure disorder,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-22 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), the Facility failed to ensure they maintained a complete and accurate medical record, when nursing failed to document his/her skin assessment and a fall in his/her medical record. Findings include: Review of the Facility Policy titled, Charting and Documentation, dated as last revised 10/2019, indicated all services provided to the resident, progress toward the care plan goals, or any changes in the resident's medical physical, functional, or psychosocial conditions, should be documented in the resident's medical record. The Policy further indicated that the following information be documented in the resident's medical record: -objective observations; -treatments or services provided; -changes in the residents condition; and -events, incidents, or accidents involving the resident. Resident #1 was admitted to the Facility in October 2023, diagnoses included acute right-sided cerebral vascular accident (CVA, interruption of blood flow to the brain), seizure disorder, metabolic encephalopathy (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that infection control measures were implemented to promote a safe, sanitary environment and to help prevent the development and potential transmission of communicable disease and infection, regarding storage of resident medication. Specifically, 1 of 2 facility medication carts inspected was found not to be clean and sanitary. Findings include: Review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance for Preventing Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAI): Environmental Cleaning in Global Healthcare Facilities with Limited Resources, last revised 5/4/23, indicated staff in medication preparation areas might be responsible for cleaning and disinfecting portable carts used to prepare or transport medications, and recommends the medication carts to be cleaned before and after every use. On 8/9/23 at 10:00 A.M., the surveyor inspected the Side 1 medication cart on the C Unit with Nurse #6. The surveyor observed each drawer of the medication cart to have dirt, dust, and debris on the bottom of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-09 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services to meet the needs of one Resident (#15), out of a total sample of 21 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #15's call light was within reach. Findings include: Resident #15 was admitted to the facility in August 2018 with diagnoses which included traumatic brain injury and dementia. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 7/25/23, indicated Resident #15 was severely cognitively impaired, had unclear speech, was sometimes able to make self understood and had the ability to sometimes understand others. The assessment indicated Resident #15 was non-ambulatory, totally dependent for mobility and toileting and had functional limitation in range of motion with upper/lower extremity impairment on both sides. Review of the facility's policy titled Answering Call Lights, dated as last revised April 2018, indicated but was not limited to: - The purpose of the procedure is to respond to the resident's requests and needs. - When the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-09 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to provide a written summary of the baseline care plan for two Residents (#273, #323), out of 21 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #273, to provide a written summary of the baseline care plan and medication review to the Resident or Resident representative; and 2. For Resident #323, to ensure that staff developed and implemented a baseline care plan or a comprehensive care plan within 48 hours as required for the Resident's cerebral infarction due to embolism of left middle cerebral artery and cerebral infarction due to unspecified occlusion or stenosis of left middle cerebral artery, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Care Plans - Baseline, established and last revised 11/2017, indicated the following: - To assure that the resident's immediate care needs are met and maintained, a baseline care plan will be developed within forty-eight (48) hours of the resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that individualized, comprehensive care plans were developed and consistently implemented for one Resident (#49), out of 21 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed to develop a care plan to address the Resident's diagnosis of psychosis. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Comprehensive Assessments and the Care Delivery Process, last revised 8/2019, included but was not limited to: -Comprehensive assessments will be conducted to assist in developing person-centered care plans; -Comprehensive assessments, care planning and the care delivery process involve collecting and analyzing information, choosing and initiating interventions, and then monitoring results and adjusting interventions; -Assess the individual: Gather relevant information from multiple sources, including: -observation; -physical assessment; -symptom or condition-related assessments; -resident and family interview; -hospital discharge summaries; -consultant reports; -lab and diagnostic test results; and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-09 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, policy review, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided the necessary respiratory care and services for one Resident (#18), out of a total sample of 21 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Oxygen was administered according to physician's orders. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Oxygen Administration, last revised 11/2017, included but was not limited to: -The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for safe oxygen administration; -Preparation: Verify there is a physician's order for this procedure and review the physician's orders; -Oxygen therapy is administered by way of an oxygen mask, nasal cannula (tube placed approximately one-half inch into the resident's nose), and /or nasal catheter; -Adjust the oxygen delivery device and the proper flow of oxygen is being administered; -After completing the oxygen setup, the following information should be recorded in the resident's medical record: -the rate of oxygen flow, route, and rationale. -the frequency and duration of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-09 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, policy review, and interviews, the facility failed to develop a person-centered plan of care which included trauma informed approaches and identified triggers to avoid potential re-traumatization for one Resident (#49) with a history of trauma, out of a total sample of 21 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Trauma Informed Care, revised October 2019, included but was not limited to: -Policy: To guide staff in appropriate and compassionate care specific to individuals who have experienced trauma. -Trauma informed care is culturally sensitive and person-centered. -Caregivers are taught strategies to help eliminate, mitigate or sensitively address a resident's triggers. Resident #49 was admitted to the facility in May 2021 with diagnoses including Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD- a mental health condition that is triggered by an event, series of events, or set of circumstances that is experienced by an individual as physically or emotionally harmful or life threatening and that has lasting adverse effects on the individual's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-09 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of significant medication errors for one Resident (#22), out of a total sample of four residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the daytime dose of Divalproex Sodium (used to treat seizure disorders, certain psychiatric conditions) was given as ordered. Findings include: Review of the medical record indicated Resident #22 was admitted to the facility in May 2019 with diagnoses including unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, with other behavioral disturbance. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 7/18/23, indicated Resident #22 was cognitively intact as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 out of 15. The MDS further indicated the Resident was ambulatory and required supervision. The Resident required one-person physical assist going off the unit. On 8/8/23 at 8:52 A.M., during medication pass, the surveyor observed Nurse #1 from Unit B side One, preparing medications for Resident #22. Nurse #1 poured the following…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-11-06 · tag F0623 — widespreadProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a Notice of Transfer/Discharge was issued to four Residents (#1, #85, #22 and #5), out of a sample of 18 current residents and three discharged residents. Specifically, the facility failed to notify the Resident/Resident Representative in writing for the reason of transfer and send a copy of the notice to the ombudsman when emergently transferred to the hospital. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Bed Holds/Returns, last revised 5/2018, indicated but was not limited to: - Prior to transfers and therapeutic leaves, residents or resident representatives will be informed in writing of the bed hold and return policy. - Prior to a transfer, written information will be given to the residents and/or the resident representatives that explains in detail: The rights and limitations of the resident regarding bed-holds; The reserve bed payment policy as indicated by the state plan; The facility per diem rate required to hold a bed, or to hold a bed beyond the state bed-hold period; The details of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-11-06 · tag F0625 — widespreadNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a Bed Hold Policy Notice was issued to four Residents (#1, #85, #22 and #5), out of a sample of 18 current residents and three discharged residents. Specifically, the facility failed to provide written notice of the facility's bed-hold policy to the resident/resident representative when transferred to the hospital. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Bed Holds/Returns, last revised 5/2018, indicated but was not limited to: - Prior to transfers and therapeutic leaves, residents or resident representatives will be informed in writing of the bed hold and return policy. - Prior to a transfer, written information will be given to the residents and/or the resident representatives that explains in detail: The rights and limitations of the resident regarding bed-holds; The reserve bed payment policy as indicated by the state plan; The facility per diem rate required to hold a bed, or to hold a bed beyond the state bed-hold period; The details of the transfer (per the Notice of Transfer). 1. Resident #1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2023-08-09 · tag F0582 — patternGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interview, and the Beneficiary Protection Notification Review, the facility failed to issue the appropriate Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice (SNF ABN) for one Resident (#50), out of three resident records reviewed. Findings include: The SNF ABN notice is administered to a Medicare recipient when the facility determines the beneficiary no longer qualifies for Medicare Part A skilled services and the resident has not used all of the Medicare benefit days for that episode. The SNF ABN provides information to beneficiaries so that they can decide if they wish to continue receiving the skilled services that may not be paid for by Medicare and assume financial responsibility. Review of the record indicated Resident #50's last covered day of Part A Service was on 5/4/23. The SNF Beneficiary Protection Notification Review indicated the facility failed to provide Resident #50 with a SNF ABN notice. During an interview on 8/04/23 at 1:25 P.M., Social Worker (SW) #2 said if a resident lives at the facility and accesses their Medicare A benefits, she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to NEXT STEP HEALTHCARE — 14 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 1.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 1.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 2.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
The other 13 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.7★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| DELL'ANNO, DAMIAN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 09/01/2017 |
| STEPHAN, WILLIAM | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 09/01/2017 |
| NEXT STEP HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/08/2025 |
| RESTITUYO, IRVING | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/10/2020 |
| SOARES, KYLE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/20/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $492K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Massachusetts Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 225145. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-06, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.