Lee Healthcare

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

44.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 138 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 40.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 90 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 39% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 88 beds and averages 69.3 residents a day — about 79% occupied, or roughly 19 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.18 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.60 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.93 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.90 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.30 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.60 to 0.60 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 62% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

34 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 23 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-09-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that professional standards of practice were implemented relative to skin and wound care for one Resident (#19) of four applicable residents reviewed for wound care, out of a total sample of 26 residents. Specifically, for Resident #19, the facility failed to: -appropriately assess and implement skin care and diabetic foot care for the Resident with a history of Diabetes, Peripheral Vascular Disease and a right below knee amputation (BKA), resulting in left toe wounds not being identified and treated timely. -submit a referral to the Wound Care Provider timely for on-going wound care when diabetic wounds were identified on the toes of the Resident's left foot. -implement treatment orders for the Resident's left toe wounds timely, resulting in delayed treatment interventions when the Resident had suspected osteomyelitis, bone exposure of the left great toe, was subsequently hospitalized and administered intravenous (IV) antibiotics…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-13 · tag F0557 — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1) who was moderately cognitively impaired and prone to agitation, the Facility failed to ensure he/she was treated in a dignified and respectful manner, when on 12/20/25, despite Resident #1 verbally objecting and telling staff not to touch his/her hat, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1 taunted Resident #1 by touching his/her hat twice, provoking him/her, instead of respecting his/her request.Findings include:Review of the Facility Policy titled Resident Rights and Responsibilities, dated as revised January 2024, indicated employees shall treat all residents with kindness, respect, and dignity.Resident #1 was admitted to the Facility in August 2023, diagnoses included moderate vascular dementia with mood disturbance and anxiety disorder.Resident #1's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 09/30/25, indicated Resident #1 was moderately cognitively impaired with a score of 9 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, scores indicate: 0-7 severe cognitive impairment, 8-12…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), the facility failed to ensure they maintained a complete and accurate medical record when on 10/18/25 after Resident #1 was seen by the Physician who made recommendations for interventions related to prevention of pressure injuries, there was no nursing documentation to support they were addressed or followed up on.Findings include:Review of the Facility Policy titled Charting and Documentation, revised 11/2024, indicated that services provided to the resident, progress toward the care plan goals, or any changes in the resident's medical physical, functional or psychosocial condition, should be documented in the resident's medical record. Resident #1 was admitted to the Facility in October 2024, diagnoses included non-displaced comminuted fracture shaft of the left femur (injury where the thigh bone breaks into three or more pieces due to high-energy trauma), and left sided and right sided foot drop (inability to lift the front part of the foot). Review of Resident #1's Physician History and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-09-10 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure three Nurses (Nurse #2, #3 and #4), of five Nurses reviewed, had been evaluated upon hire and/or annually to ensure skills and competencies were met relative to wound care.Specifically, for one Resident (#19) who had diabetic wounds, the facility failed to ensure Nurses #2, #3, and #4, who provided care to Resident #19, were evaluated upon hire and/or annually to ensure they had the skill sets and competencies when providing wound care. Finding include: Review of the Facility Assessment, last reviewed on 8/29/25, indicated the facility had the capability to care for the residents who had:-skin ulcers and injuries-skin and soft tissue infections-advanced wound care needs In addition, the Facility Assessment indicated the following relative to Staff Training/Education and Competencies:-facility utilizes a computer-based program for various training modules which are assigned and completed throughout the year. -an annual competency fair is conducted, allowing staff to practice and demonstrate required…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-09-10 · tag F0730 — pattern
  Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a performance review of every nurse aide at least once every 12 months, for five Certified Nurse Aide (CNA #1, #2, #4, #5, and #6), out of five total records sampled. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure annual performance reviews were completed every 12 months for CNAs #1, #2, #4, #5, and #6. Findings include: Review of the facility provided CNA Active Employee Listing, undated, indicated the following: -CNA #1 was hired 7/28/15-CNA #2 was hired 7/1/24-CNA #4 was hired 12/4/23. -CNA #5 was hired 7/1/24. -CNA #6 was hired 2/5/24. During an interview on 9/9/25 at 2:51 P.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) said CNA performance reviews should be completed annually with all CNA's who worked in the facility. The DON said she was unable to locate annual performance reviews for CNA #1 and CNA #2.During a follow-up interview on 9/9/25 at 3:41 P.M., the DON said she was unable to provide annual performance reviews for CNAs #4, #5, and #6. During an interview on 9/10/25 at 11:32 A.M., the Administrator said annual…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-10 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that Advance Directives were honored for one Resident (#11), out of a total sample of 26 residents. Specifically, for Resident #11, the facility failed to ensure that the Physician's orders accurately reflected the Resident/Resident Representative's wishes as indicated on the Medical Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (MOLST: legal document that allows individuals to communicate their preferences for life-sustaining treatment to healthcare providers) form, putting the Resident at risk for being resuscitated (perform full measures including cardiopulmonary resuscitation and intubation) when the advanced directive wishes were for no resuscitation (do not resuscitate [DNR]). Findings include: Review of the facility policy Advance Directives, revised January 2024, indicated the following: -Advance directives will be respected in accordance with state law and facility policy -The plan of care for each resident will be consistent with his or her…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-10 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to respond to or resolve grievances for one Resident (#54) out of a total sample of 26 residents. Specially the facility failed to respond to three grievances filed by Resident #54's family on 4/25/25. Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled Grievances, last updated on 2/2024, indicated the following in part:-The administrator is identified as the grievance official responsible for oversight of the grievance process in the facility. This includes responsibility for reviewing and tracking grievances, necessary investigating, ensuring that grievances are addressed and a response provided.-Any resident, and or health care representative, family member, employee or appointed advocate may file a grievance without fear or discrimination or reprisal in any form-Grievances may be submitted orally or in writing.The administrator will review the findings with the person investigating the grievance to determine what corrective actions need to be made-The resident, and/or health care representative, or person filing the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-10 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure a Notice of Transfer or Discharge and a Bed Hold were provided to residents or their resident representatives at the time of transfer or shortly there after and that the Office of the State Long-term Care Ombudsman was notified at the time of transfer or shortly there after for one Resident (#74) out of a total sample of three residents reviewed for closed records and for one Resident (#70) out of a total of 26 active records reviewed.Specifically, 1. For Resident #74 and #70 the facility failed to ensure the Office of the State Long-term Care Ombudsman was notified when Resident #74 and #70 were transferred from the facility to the hospital, and 2. Additionally, for Resident #70 the facility failed to ensure the -Resident/Representative had been provided with a copy of the bed hold policy, a notice of intent to transfer and that the appropriate information had been provided to the receiving facility, that included a discharge summary with vital information relative to the Resident and his/her level of care. Findings…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-10 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessments were completed accurately to reflect the resident's status for eight Residents (#1, #3, #4, #6, #23, #31, #48, and #67), out of a total of 26 residents sampled.Specifically, for Residents #1, #3, #4, #23, #31, #48, and #67, the facility failed to ensure the Section F-Preferences for Customary Routine and Activities Assessment was completed with the Resident or a Staff Interview was completed if the Resident was unable to participate in a Resident Interview for the most recent comprehensive MDS Assessment. Findings include:1. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility in August 2025 with diagnoses including but not limited to Paraplegia, Osteomyelitis, Adult Failure to Thrive, and Type 2 Diabetes. Review of Resident #1's most recent comprehensive MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated he/she scored a 15 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating he/she was cognitively intact, he/she had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-10 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure its staff followed professional standards for care and services relative to a suprapubic catheter (an indwelling urinary catheter placed directly into the bladder through the abdomen) and a colostomy (a surgical procedure where a portion of the large intestine is brought through the abdominal wall to carry stool out of the body) for one Resident (#70), out of a total sample of 26 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to obtain Physician orders on how to provide care and services for both the suprapubic catheter and the colostomy. Additionally, the facility failed to develop policies and procedures on how to provide care and services for both the suprapubic catheter and the colostomy, putting the Resident at an increased risk of infection, complications and/or improper care techniques.Findings include:Resident #70 was admitted to the facility July 2025 with diagnoses that included Type 2 Diabetes, below the left knee leg amputation, above…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide an environment that was free of potential accidents and hazards and implement the facility policy to ensure smoking safety for two residents (#70 and #1) of three applicable residents reviewed for smoking, out of a total sample of 26 residents. 1. For Resident #70 the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision was provided and an individualized care plan was developed.2. For Resident #1, the facility failed to ensure that the Resident was assessed for safety prior to the Resident resuming smoking at the facility placing the Resident at risk for injury. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Smoking Policy- Residents, last revised on 3/2024, indicated the following: -The resident will be evaluated upon admission or when a resident chooses to smoke to determine of the resident's ability to smoke safely -Any smoking related concerns will be noted in the resident care plan -Residents who are supervised for smoking will be monitored by a staff member or designee during the allowed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to NEXT STEP HEALTHCARE — 14 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $362K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MA