Norwood Healthcare
460 Washington Street, Norwood, MA 02062 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 170 certified beds · (787) 444-8383 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (25% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- inspectors cited 4 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (68) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $110,264 in federal fines (most recent 2026-02-09)
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 4.0% | 16.4% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 9.7% | 5.1% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.7% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.1% | 1.8% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 7.8% | 15.5% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 5.2% | 3.4% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 4.3% | 15.4% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 18.6% | 19.5% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 94.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.4% | 4.2% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 23.9% | 21.2% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 40.9% | 21.4% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 4.3% | 1.4% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 91.5% | 77.7% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 32.8% | 25.7% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 10.9% | 11.9% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.90 | 1.88 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.84 | 1.50 | 1.80 | typical |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Met the expected recovery: 16.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 24 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.13 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 9% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 77% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.0%CMS range 6.9–16.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 16.7% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 16.7% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 8.3% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 96.9% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 3.1% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.1%CMS range 3.4–13.5 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.80 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 170 beds and averages 113.4 residents a day — about 67% occupied, or roughly 57 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.477 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.88 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.91 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.16 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.60 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.93 to 0.74 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 25% is below the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
68 citations, most serious first. The 17 most serious are shown; the remaining 51 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-02-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to develop, maintain, and implement an active, interdisciplinary, person centered care plan to address a known elopement risk for one Resident (#83), in a sample of 25, despite documented severe cognitive impairment (BIMS=3 on 11/24/25), exit seeking behavior, and a high risk elopement score of 14 (11/18/25). The facility resolved the elopement/wandering care plan on 11/28/25 without IDT review or subsequent risk reassessment, and did not implement effective interventions (e.g., wander alert specifications, door/elevator supervision) consistent with assessed needs. On 1/17/26, Resident #83 eloped from the facility, was not identified as missing until approximately 5:00 PM, and was located by police at Boston's South Station, approximately 21 miles away from the facility, and transported to the hospital, placing the Resident at a likelihood of serious harm and death. Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Policy: Care Plans, comprehensive person-centered, revised 1/2024, indicated but was not limited to:-a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-02-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision and interventions were implemented to prevent accidents for one Resident (#83), out of a total sample of 25 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure an elopement/wandering care plan and interventions for a resident assessed at high risk for elopement (score 14, 11/18/25) was maintained and implemented, failed to include the Resident in the elopement photo/binder alert system, and failed to prevent unsupervised exit through the main door, resulting in an elopement on 1/17/26. Resident #83 was not discovered missing from the facility until 5:00 P.M. and was located by the police at a South Boston train station, approximately 21 miles away, and hospitalized , placing the Resident at immediate risk of serious harm and death. Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Policy: Care Plans, comprehensive person-centered, revised 1/2024, indicated but was not limited to:-a comprehensive,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-05-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and records reviewed, for one of three sampled Residents (Resident #1), whose history included a traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage without loss of consciousness and unspecified intracranial injury without loss of consciousness (traumatic brain injury/TBI), after being hit by a car as a pedestrian, who had limited attention/concentration and impaired judgement/insight, had a court appointed legal guardian, resided on a secured unit, and who was assessed and care planned for the need for staff supervision while smoking and using smoking materials, the Facility failed to ensure they provided an adequate level of staff to supervise the outside smoking area, as well as monitor and supervise the facility lobby during smoking break times to prevent an incident/accident, including an elopement. On 5/02/24, Resident #1, who was attending the 4:00 P.M., scheduled supervised smoke break group, was given a cigarette by the Nurse Supervisor, however he/she did not stay and wait with the other residents as they were getting their smoking materials, and when the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-10-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews and records reviewed, for one of three sampled Residents (Resident #1), who had a history of being homeless, with alcohol and substance abuse disorders, was assessed to be at risk for elopement and his/her care plan indicated he/she was to remain in the Facility unless supervised due to a history of elopement, the Facility failed to ensure staff consistently implemented and followed interventions from his/her Plans of Care related to Elopement and Smoking, for safety. On 10/01/23, Resident #1 left his/her secure second-floor unit (North 2), unsupervised and unbeknownst to staff, took the elevator down to the first floor lobby and exited the Facility through a locked front door. Once outside of the front door, Resident #1 walked around the area where residents were smoking for approximately three minutes unnoticed by staff, before leaving the Facility grounds. Resident #1's whereabouts were unknown for approximately thirty-two hours, during which time a serious adverse outcome was likely to occur. On 10/02/23, Resident #1 called 911 from a train…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-10-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and records reviewed, for one of three sampled Residents (Resident #1), who had a history of being homeless, with alcohol and substance abuse disorders, resided on a secured unit in the facility, who was to remain in the Facility unless supervised due to a history of elopement and had an activated Health Care Proxy, the Facility failed to ensure he/she was provided with an adequate level of staff supervision to maintain his/her safety in an effort to prevent an elopement. On 10/01/23, Resident #1 left his/her secure second-floor unit (North 2), unsupervised and unbeknownst to staff, took the elevator down to the first floor lobby and exited the Facility through a locked front door. At the time of the elopement, a facility Administrative staff member was stationed in the lobby monitoring the locked front door, letting visitors, staff and residents in and out of the facility and was also responsible for supervising any residents who were out in the smoking area (located outside of the front door). Resident #1 walked out the front door and walked around…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2023-07-21 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to prevent the development of a contracture for 1 Resident (#8) and failed to implement a left-hand roll splint for 1 Resident (#1), out of a total sample of 33 residents. Findings include: 1. Resident #8 admitted to the facility in January 2016 with diagnoses including dementia. Review of Resident #8's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated the Resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3 out of a possible 15, indicating he/she has severe cognitive impairment. The MDS also indicated Resident #8 is dependent on staff for all mobility, bathing and dressing needs. On 7/18/23 at 8:35 A.M., Resident #8 was observed lying in bed. His/her left hand was in a closed, fisted position. The Resident was unable to open his/her hand. Resident #8 was unable to say how long he/she has been unable to vountarily open his/her hand. Review of Resident #8's medical record indicated the Resident does not have a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-07-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility 1) failed to ensure interventions to prevent a fall for one Resident (#80) were implemented, 2. failed to ensure supervision was provided to prevent one Resident (#78) from leaving the building unattended putting him/her at risk in the community, 3) failed to follow the emergency safety procedures during a fire alarm, and 4) failed to ensure supervision was provided and smoking articles were maintained safely for 2 Resident (#26, and #43 ) out of eleven applicable residents. Findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Falls and Fall Risk, Managing, dated 12/2022, indicated the following: *Based on previous evaluations and current data, the staff will identify interventions related to the resident's specific risks and causes to try to prevent the resident from falling and to try to minimize complications from falling. *The staff will implement a resident-centered fall care plan to reduce the specific risk factor(s) of falls for each…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-05 · tag F0777 — isolatedProvide or obtain x-rays/tests when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who in the morning on 3/31/26 exhibited signs of acute pain in his/her right shoulder and arm, and had a new Physician's order for a STAT (without delay, immediately) x-ray, the Facility failed to ensure that he/she was provided with radiology services consistent with his/her Physician's Orders, when nursing did not follow up on the order and a STAT x-ray was not obtained, as a result he/she had to be transferred to the Hospital Emergency Department the following day to obtain an x-ray.Findings Include:Resident #1 was admitted to the Facility in March 2025, diagnoses included Alzheimer's, dementia, lack of coordination, difficulty walking, and history of falling.Review of Resident #1's Incident Report, dated 03/29/26, indicated that he/she had an unwitnessed fall, he/she was assessed and no injuries were noted.Review of Resident #1's Nurse Progress Note, dated 03/31/26 (written by Nurse #2), indicated Resident #1 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-02-09 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespreadHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to maintain a Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program with documentation of the development, implementation, and evaluation of corrective actions or performance improvement activities and failed to maintain a QAPI program which addressed the full range of care and services including clinical care. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI), dated as last revised 6/2024, indicated but was not limited to the following:-The purpose of the committee is to review and analyze facility related data and direct appropriate actions for the facility response.-Our QAPI plan addresses: Clinical indicators, Environmental indicators, and Resident indicators.-We will identify areas of improvement and rank them by factors such as prevalence, risk, relevance, responsiveness, feasibility, and continuity. From this we will determine our Performance Improvement Projects (PIP).-The Administrator is responsible and accountable for developing, leading, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-02-09 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespreadSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to maintain a Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program with documentation of the development, implementation, and evaluation of corrective actions or performance improvement activities. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) dated as last revised 6/2024 indicated but was not limited to the following:-The purpose of the committee is to review and analyze related data and direct appropriate actions for the facility.-It is the responsibility of the QAPI Committee to consider all data presented by the QAPI team and to direct the QAPI team to continue or conclude the assignment.-Our QAPI plan addresses Clinical Indicators, Environmental Indicators, and Resident Indicators.-We will identify areas of improvement and rank them by factors and determine our Performance Improvement Projects (PIP).-The Administrator is responsible and accountable for developing, leading, and monitoring the QAPI program.-The Committee maintains QAPI minutes, project,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-02-09 · tag F0868 — widespreadHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to maintain a Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Committee which included the required members at their meetings. Specifically, the facility's Director of Nurses (DON) and Infection Preventionist (IP) failed to attend and participate in three of the last three quarterly QAPI meetings. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Quality Assurance Performance Improvement, dated as last revised 6/2024, indicated but was not limited to the following:-The facility will form a QAPI that meets quarterly. The Committee must include the Medical Director, Administrator, Director of Nurses, Infection Preventionist, and two other staff members.-The purpose of the committee is to review and analyze related data and direct appropriate actions for the facility. Review of the quarterly sign-in-sheets for 2025 indicated the following:-April 2025: The DON was present. He also served as the IP at that time.-July 24, 2025: The DON and Assistant Director of Nurses (ADON)/IP were present.-October 2025: The DON and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-02-09 · tag F0944 — widespreadConduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on document review and interview, the facility failed to provide training and education to all their staff to outline current elements, projects, goals, and revisions of the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) program. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI), dated as last revised 6/2024, indicated but was not limited to the following:-Communication about QAPI activities is shared via staff meetings and/or trainings.Review of the facility's education records on QAPI training indicated staff were trained on the general concept of QAPI but failed to indicate staff were educated on the facility's QAPI projects, plans, or goals as required.During an interview on 2/2/26 at 1:30 P.M., Consulting Staff #3 said she does not have any records related to any QAPI project and education/training from 2025. She said the online training record she provided was education on the general Policy and Procedure and was not specific to any projects the facility was working on.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-09 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of Resident Council Minutes, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure concerns brought forward from the Resident Council were addressed and promptly resolved to ensure the residents felt their concerns were acted upon timely and included the facility response to the group. Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Resident Council, last revised on 2/24, indicated but was not limited to the following:-The facility will provide a designated staff person who is approved by the resident group and facility who is responsible for providing assistance and responding to written requests from group meetings.-Department heads must respond to grievances addressed in the minutes in writing before the next meeting.Review of Resident Council Minutes, dated 7/5/25, indicated the residents would like to get a video game, more hamburgers for evening meals, and evening activities once a month. The minutes also indicated that the residents would like to go outside more. The form…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-09 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to voice and formulate grievances, have those grievances responded to promptly, and be provided a resolution to their grievance. Specifically, the facility failed to:1. Ensure residents had access to grievance forms and were aware they could formulate grievances anonymously, should they choose not to alert a staff member of their concern(s); and2. Maintain evidence demonstrating the results of all grievances for a period of no less than three years from the issuance of the grievance decision.Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Grievances, last revised 2/24, indicated but was not limited to the following:Guidelines:-The administrator is identified as the grievance official responsible for oversight of the grievance process in the facility. This includes responsibility for reviewing and tracking grievances, necessary investigating, ensuring that grievances are addressed and a response provided.-Any resident, and/or health care representative, family member, employee, or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-09 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (#8), out of a total sample of 23 residents, received care and treatment in accordance with professional standards. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure a physician's order to increase Trazodone (antidepressant/used for behavior management) was transcribed into the electronic medical record and implemented. Findings include: Review of the Lippincott Manual of Nursing Practice, 11th Edition (2019) indicated: Scope of Practice, Licensure, and Certification: The professional nurse's scope of practice is defined and outlined by the State Board of Nursing that governs practice. The National Council of State Boards of Nursing and the National League of Nursing have developed standards that guide each State Board in the development of their licensure requirements and scope of practice rules. Review of the Massachusetts Board of Registration in Nursing Advisory Ruling on Nursing Practice dated as revised April 11, 2018, indicated but was not limited to the following:Nurse's Responsibility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-09 · tag F0685 — patternAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the necessary vision services were provided for one Resident (#1), out of a total sample of 23 residents. Findings include: The facility indicated they did not have a policy for Consultant Providers. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility in August 2025 with diagnoses which included diabetes mellitus with neuropathy, ketoacidosis, foot ulcer, and hyperglycemia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 11/21/25, indicated Resident #1 scored 15 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) Assessment indicating he/she was cognitively intact. During an interview on 1/13/26 at 10:15 A.M., the surveyor observed Resident #1 wearing glasses. Resident #1 said he/she signed the consent for vision services and was told the eye doctor would see him/her at the facility. The Resident said his/her vision is so bad and it keeps getting worse. The Resident said he/she keeps asking about the eye doctor but has gotten nothing but the run around for months, no one will tell him/her when the eye doctor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-09 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — patternImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement an antibiotic stewardship program which included antibiotic use protocols and monitoring of antibiotic use in accordance with the facility's antibiotic stewardship program. Findings include: Review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance titled The Core Elements of Antibiotic Stewardship for Nursing Homes, undated, indicated but was not limited to the following: - The purpose of an antibiotic stewardship program is to improve the use of antibiotics in healthcare to protect patients and reduce the threat of antibiotic resistance.- Antibiotic stewardship refers to a set of commitments and actions designed to optimize the treatment of infections while reducing the adverse events associated with antibiotic use.- The CDC recommends that all nursing homes take steps to improve antibiotic prescribing practices and reduce inappropriate use.- Any action taken to improve antibiotic use is expected to reduce adverse events, prevent emergence of resistance, and lead to better outcomes for residents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 51 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-09 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolatedAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (#24), out of a total sample of 23 residents, was invited to his/her care planning meetings to participate in their plan of care.Findings include:Review of facility's policy titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, last revised on 1/24, indicated but was not limited to the following:-The resident will be informed of his or her right to participate in his or her treatment.-The interdisciplinary team (IDT) may include: the provider, the nurse responsible for the resident, the aide responsible for the resident, nutrition staff, the resident and the resident's legal representative, and other appropriate staff as determined by the resident's needs or as requested by the resident. Resident #24 was admitted to the facility in November 2025 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and emphysema.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/24/25, indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15, indicating that the Resident is cognitively…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-09 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (#8), out of a total sample of 23 residents, was free from unnecessary psychotropic medications by ensuring an as needed (PRN) dose of Zyprexa (antipsychotic) was limited to 14 days. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Psychotropic Medication, dated as last revised July 2023, indicated but was not limited to the following:-Psychotropic medications will be prescribed at the lowest possible dosage and are subject to gradual dose reductions and re-review as needed.-The need to continue PRN orders for psychotropic medications beyond 14 days require that the practitioner document the rationale for the extended orders, the duration of the PRN order will be indicated in the order.-PRN orders for antipsychotic medications will not be renewed beyond 14 days unless the health care practitioner has evaluated the resident for appropriateness of that medication. Resident #8 was admitted to the facility in June 2025 with diagnoses which included depression, vascular dementia with or without…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-09 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on document review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that monthly Medication Regimen Reviews (MRR) were addressed and implemented in a timely manner for one Resident (#6), out of a total sample of 23 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure a recommendation by the pharmacy consultant to obtain a Vitamin D level to consider tapering down the Vitamin D dose and signed by the physician was reviewed by nursing, transcribed, and implemented per the provider's order. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Regimen Review, dated 8/2020, indicated but was not limited to the following:-The consultant pharmacist identifies irregularities.-Resident specific irregularities and/or clinically significant risks resulting from or associated with medications are documented in the resident's active record and reported to the Director of Nurses (DON), Medical Director, and/or prescriber as appropriate.-Recommendations are acted upon and documented by the facility staff and/or the prescriber.-The DON or designated licensed nurse address and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice for food safety and sanitation to prevent the potential spread of foodborne illness to residents who are at high risk. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure four of four kitchenettes were maintained in a clean, sanitary condition. Findings include: Review of the 2022 Food Code by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), revised 1/2023, indicated but was not limited to the following: 3-305.11 (A) Except as specified in paragraphs (B) and (C) of this section, food shall be protected from contamination by storing the food (1) in a clean, dry location. 4-602.13 Nonfood-contact surfaces of equipment shall be cleaned at a frequency necessary to preclude accumulation of soil residues. 6-101.11 Surface Characteristics. (A) Except as specified in (B) of this section, materials for indoor floor, wall, and ceiling surfaces under conditions of normal use shall be: (1) SMOOTH, durable, and EASILY CLEANABLE for areas where FOOD ESTABLISHMENT operations are conducted. On 1/14/26, the surveyor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-17 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who had a Physician's Order for weekly weights times four (4) weeks, the Facility failed to ensure nursing provided care and services that met professional standards of quality, when his/her weights were not obtained per his/her Physician Order.Findings include:Review of the Facility Policy titled Weight Measurement, dated as last revised 04/2019, indicated each resident's weight will be obtained on admission and then weekly times four (4) weeks, subsequent weights will be monthly, unless physician's orders warrant more frequent.The Policy also indicated that the Registered Dietician will be the responsible for determining the desirable body weight range and will be documented on the initial medical nutrition therapy (MNT) assessment and reassessment.Review of the Facility Policy titled Medication and Treatment Orders, dated as last revised, 09/2024, indicated all orders for medication and treatments will be consistent with regulatory standards.The Policy further indicated medications and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-11 · tag F0559 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who had an activated Health Care Agent (HCA), the Facility failed to ensure that his/her HCA received written notice, including the reason for the change, when on 12/13/24 Resident #1's was moved to a new room without obtaining consent from and notifying his/her HCA of the room change. Findings include: Resident #1 was admitted to the Facility in December 2024 diagnoses include bilateral pulmonary embolisms (blood clots), left lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (blood clot), low back pain, and dementia. Review of Resident #1's Physician's Orders, dated 12/02/24, indicated that his/her Health Care Agent (HCA) had been responsible for his/her health care decisions. Review of Resident #1's admission Minimum Data Set (MS) Assessment, dated 12/08/24, indicated he/she had moderate cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #1's Nurse Progress Note (written by the Nursing Supervisor), dated 12/13/24, indicated that he/she had been moved to a new room, appears comfortable and he/she was adjusting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-11 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), the Facility failed to report ensure they reported an allegation of abuse to the Department of Public Health (DPH) within two hours, as required. On 01/02/25, Resident #1 was observed with an injury of unknown origin and the Facility did not report the incident to DPH, until 02/02/25, a month after the injury had been identified. Findings include: Review of the Facility Policy titled Abuse Investigation and Reporting, dated as last reviewed 2/2024, indicated each resident has the right to be free from verbal, sexual, physical and mental abuse, neglect, corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, and misappropriation of their property. The Policy defines Injury of Unknown Etiology as any resident injury where the source of injury was not observed, or the source of injury cannot be explained by the resident. The Policy further indicated that the Facility must report to DPH and local law enforcement any reasonable suspicion…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-11 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), the Facility failed to ensure a thorough investigation was conducted related to an injury of unknown origin, when on 01/02/25 after staff found a bump on Resident #1's left forehead, the Facility was unable to provide documentation to support they conducted an investigation, into the injury. Findings include: Review of the Facility Policy titled Abuse Investigation and Reporting, dated as last reviewed 2/2024, indicated each resident has the right to be free from verbal, sexual, physical and mental abuse, neglect, corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, and misappropriation of their property. The Policy defines Injury of Unknown Etiology as any resident injury where the source of injury was not observed, or the source of injury cannot be explained by the resident and the Nursing Supervisor will notify, the provider, Health Care Proxy, Responsible Party, Administrator, and Director of Nurses. The Policy indicates to do…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on records reviewed and interviews, for two of three sampled residents (Resident #1 and #2), who upon admission were each identified as at risk for falls, the Facility failed to ensure after they experienced a witnessed and/or unwitnessed fall, that their plans of care were reviewed and revised for new interventions goals, and outcomes, as needed. Findings include: Review of the Facility Policy titled Fall Prevention and Management, dated as last revised 11/2024, indicated to prevent or minimize resident fall risk through identification of fall risk factors and implementation of interventions to prevent falls. The Policy further indicated the following; -If a resident falls, the nurse will conduct a physical assessment of the resident and notify the Provider and Responsible Party; -If a fall is unwitnessed or the resident hits his/her head during the fall, Neurological Assessment should be conducted. -Statements should be obtained from staff on the unit at the time of the fall; and -A new intervention will be added to the resident's care plan. Review of the Facility Policy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-10-30 · tag F0850 — failed to provide social-work services — widespreadHire a qualified full-time social worker in a facility with more than 120 beds.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to employ a full time Social Worker as required for any facility with more than 120 beds. Findings include: During the Entrance Conference meeting on 10/22/24 at 10:00 A.M., the Administrator and Regional Nurse said there has been no full time Social Worker in the facility since July 2024. Review of the Facility Assessment indicated total licensed bed capacity of 170, with 162 active beds. During an interview on 10/23/24 at 10:00 A.M., the Administrator said the facility had consulting Social Workers in the facility from July to current covering a few hours per week, but the coverage was not for full time hours. Review of the Consulting Social Worker Hours indicated the following: - 7/1/24 through 7/6/24: 10.75 hours - 7/7/24 through 7/13/24: 23.32 hours - 7/14/24 through 7/20/24: 14.02 hours - 7/21/24 through 7/27/24: 4.00 hours - 7/28/24 through 8/3/24: 15.00 hours - 8/4/24 through 8/10/24: 23.65 hours - 8/11/24 through 8/17/24: 7.33 hours - 8/18/24 through 8/24/24: 19.05 hours - 8/25/24 through 8/31/24: 6.00 hours - 9/1/24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-30 · tag F0551 — patternGive the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a [NAME] treatment plan (court approved treatment plan for the administration of antipsychotic medications) was active and current for administration of an antipsychotic medication for two Residents (#16 and #25), out of 39 sampled residents with legal guardians (a person who has been appointed by a court or otherwise has the legal authority to care for the personal and property interests of another person who is deemed incapacitated). The facility identified an additional 21 residents with legal guardians that are being administered antipsychotic medication and require a [NAME] Treatment plan. Of these 21 residents, the facility failed to ensure 19 residents had valid, court approved [NAME] treatment plans in place for the administration of antipsychotic medication. Findings include: 1. Resident #16 was admitted to the facility in [DATE] and had diagnoses including paranoid schizophrenia and dementia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment on one unit out of a total of four units. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the North Two unit temperature was maintained between 71-81 degrees Fahrenheit. Findings include: On 10/28/24 at 8:31 A.M., the surveyor entered the North 2 unit between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]. The temperature was noticeably colder than the rest of the facility. During an interview on 10/28/24 at 8:31 A.M., Resident #24 said, It is cold on the unit and it has been all weekend. It was reported to the nurse over the weekend but nothing had been done. During an interview with observation on 10/28/24 at 9:14 A.M., Resident #98 said, It's been cold in here for a few days now. It feels like there is no heat. It's very cold. The surveyor observed Resident #98 to be wearing long flannel pants and a long sleeve shirt. During an interview on 10/28/24 at 9:20 A.M., the Regional Facility Engineer said he was trying to figure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-30 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary respiratory care and services to three Residents (#51, #31, #17), out of a total sample of 39 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions of respiratory equipment, including nasal cannula tubing, nebulizer mask/tubing, bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP) mask/tubing, and/or continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) mask/tubing to decrease the risk of potential contamination of germs and/or exposure to infection. Findings include: Review of the AARC (American Association for Respiratory Care) Clinical Practice Guideline, updated 2014: https://www.aarc.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/08.07.1063.pdf indicates: -Undesirable results or events may result from noncompliance with physicians' orders or inadequate instruction for oxygen therapy. -Equipment maintenance and supervision: All oxygen delivery equipment should be checked at least once daily. 1. Resident #51 was admitted to the facility in September 2021 with diagnoses including complete C1-C4…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-30 · tag F0699 — patternProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to address a history of trauma (results from an event, series of events, or set of circumstances that is experienced by an individual as physically or emotionally harmful or life threatening and that has lasting adverse effects on the individual's functioning and mental, physical, social, emotional, or spiritual well-being) identified on trauma assessments and failed to thoroughly assess and to develop a plan of care accounting for Resident's experiences and preferences in order to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization for one Resident (#8), with a self-reported history of trauma, out of a total sample of 39 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Trauma Informed Care, last revised 10/2019, indicated but was not limited to: -As part of the comprehensive assessment, identify history of trauma or interpersonal violence when such information is provided to the facility. Identifying past trauma or adverse experiences may involve record review or the use of screening tools.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff stored all drugs and biologicals used in the facility in accordance with currently accepted professional principles. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the treatment carts were locked when not in direct supervision of the licensed nurse on three of three units. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Storage of Medications, dated September 2018, indicated but was not limited to: - Medication rooms, carts, and medication supplies are locked when they are not attended by persons with authorized access. The surveyor made the following observations on: -10/23/24 at 8:51 A.M., a treatment cart unlocked and unattended on the North 1Unit. -10/23/24 at 12:34 P.M., a treatment cart unlocked and unattended on the South 2 Unit. -10/23/24 at 12:41 P.M., a treatment cart unlocked and unattended on the South 2 Unit. -10/23/24 at 2:11 P.M., a treatment cart unlocked and unattended on the North 2 Unit, 1 resident walked by the treatment cart. -10/23/24 at 3:12 P.M., a treatment cart unlocked and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice for food safety and sanitation to prevent potential spread of foodborne illness to residents who are at high risk. Specifically, the facility failed to properly label and date food products in the main kitchen. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Food and Supply Storage, last revised 6/2018, indicated but was not limited to: - Policy: Food, non-food items, and supplies used in food preparation and service shall be stored in such a manner as to maintain safety and sanitation of the food or supply for human consumption as outlined in the Federal Drug Administration Food Code, state regulations, and city/county health codes. - Labeling and rotating food supply -Food products that are opened and not completely used; transferred from its original package to another storage container; or prepared at the facility and stored should be labeled as to its contents and use by dates. -Follow recommendations from the manufacturer when indicated on the product for storage time…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain medical records that were complete and accurate within accepted professional standards of practice for six Residents (#86, #96, #24, #12, #45 and #54), out of a total sample of 39 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure physician visits were available in the medical record within a timely manner for Residents #86 and #96; 2. Ensure the medical record contained accurate information regarding Residents #24 and #12's suprapubic tube (a tube surgically placed to empty the bladder of urine); and 3. Ensure clinical Substance Abuse assessments and notes were readily accessible and part of the medical record for Residents #45 and #54. The facility identified an additional 32 residents diagnosed with alcohol abuse and/or substance abuse. Of these 32 residents, the facility failed to ensure 32 residents' Substance Abuse assessments and notes were readily accessible and part of the medical record. Findings include: Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment, and to help prevent the development and potential transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Maintain a complete and accurate system of surveillance and analyze their collected surveillance data to identify any trends of actual or potential infections within the facility to validate the effectiveness of their program; 2A. For Resident #86, who has a gastrostomy tube (feeding tube), ensure staff use appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) for enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) when providing care; B. For Resident #3, ensure staff use the appropriate PPE for EBP when providing catheter care; and C. For Resident #107, ensure staff wore PPE while providing care for the Resident who was on EBP for a Central venous catheter (CVC) inserted into their right jugular vein. Findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-30 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to notify the Physician and/or responsible party of recommendations or changes in condition for two Residents (#86 and #8), out of a total sample of 39 residents. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #86, to notify the Physician of recommendations from the Dietitian for a change in nutritional formula to enhance the caloric intake of the malnourished Resident; and 2. For Resident #8, to notify the Health Care Proxy (HCP- health care agent designated by the resident when competent who has the authority to consent for health care decisions when a resident has been declared, by a physician, not to be competent to make his/her own health care decisions) when the Resident developed a deep tissue injury to the left heel and a stage 3 pressure wound (full thickness tissue loss. Subcutaneous fat may be visible, but bone, tendon or muscle are NOT exposed) to the left buttock. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Change in Resident's Condition or Status, last revised 7/2024, indicated but…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized, person-centered care plan to meet the physical, psychosocial, and functional needs for two Residents (#109, #58), out of a total sample of 39 residents. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #109, to develop and implement a care plan to address the Resident's chronic pain and pain management; and 2. For Resident #58, to develop and implement a care plan to address the care and management of the Resident's left hand and elbow contracture. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, last revised 1/2024, indicated but was not limited to: - A comprehensive, person-centered care plan will be developed for each resident. - The care plan will include objectives that meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs and is developed for each resident. - The Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) in conjunction with the resident and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure professional standards of care were met for one Resident (#107), out of a total sample of 39 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure staff provided care and maintained the central venous catheter (CVC) tunneled into the right jugular (vein in the neck) of Resident #107 for medication infusions in accordance with current standards. Findings include: Review of the Massachusetts 244 CMR Board of Registration in Nursing, Section 3, dated 6/11/21, indicated but was not limited to the following: -A registered nurse shall bear full and ultimate responsibility for the quality of nursing care he or she provides to individuals or groups. Included in such responsibility is health maintenance, teaching, counseling, collaborative planning and restoration of optimal functioning and comfort. -A registered nurse shall systematically assess health status, plan, and implement nursing intervention, evaluate outcomes and initiate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to monitor and document the range of motion (ROM) for a resident admitted with left arm contractures, failed to implement recommendations from the Occupational therapy assessments for contracture management, and failed to educate the staff on proper application of the position devices currently in use for one Resident (#58), out of a total sample of 38 residents. Findings include: Resident #58 was admitted to the facility in January 2023 with diagnoses which included: non-traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage (brain bleed), aphasia (unable to formulate language due to brain injury), dysarthria and anarthria (complete loss or partial loss of speech), cerebral infarction (stroke), hemiplegia (paralysis on one side) affecting left dominant side. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 9/13/24, indicated Resident #58 scored 1 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), indicating he/she had severe cognitive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff provided residents with an environment free from accident hazards. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: 1. On one unit of three units, hazardous items were stored in a secure location and were not easily accessible to residents on the South 2 Unit; and 2. For Resident (#54) and one unit (Unit 2) of three units in the facility, nail clippers, diabetic testing supplies and medications (not prescribed by the Resident's physician) were not stored in the Resident's bureau and were not easily accessible to the Resident and wandering residents on the unit. Findings include: Review of the facility Matrix (used to identify pertinent care categories for residents) provided to surveyors by the Director of Nursing on 10/22/24 indicated the South 2 Unit had 29 out of 34 residents with diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease/Dementia. 1. On 10/23/24 at 12:38 P.M., the surveyor observed in the South 2 Unit hallway: - A yellow bucket (unattended) containing: - Three metal scrappers - A box of nails - A metal trowel - Loose…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services for the care of an indwelling suprapubic catheter (tube that drains urine from the bladder through a small incision in the lower abdomen and into a collection bag outside the body) for one Resident (#12), out of total sample of 29 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the Resident's suprapubic catheter device was maintained in a sanitary way. Findings include: Review of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance titled Summary of Recommendations, Guideline for Prevention of Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections, dated March 2024, indicated but was not limited to the following: -Do not rest the bag on the floor. Resident #12 was admitted to the facility in October 2020 and had diagnoses including neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder and hydronephrosis (excess fluid in a kidney due to a backup of urine) with renal and ureteral calculus (stone) obstruction. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 9/6/24,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and records reviewed, for one of three sampled Residents (Resident #1), whose medical history included a traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage without loss of consciousness and unspecified intracranial injury without loss of consciousness (traumatic brain injury/TBI), after being hit by a car as a pedestrian, he/she had limited attention and concentration, impaired judgement/insight, was assessed and care planned for the need for staff supervision while smoking and using smoking materials, the Facility failed to ensure that 1) staff consistently implemented and followed interventions from his/her Plan of Care related smoking safety with the need for staff supervision while he/she was in possession of smoking materials, and 2) that he/she was accurately assessed by nursing based on criteria identified on the facility elopement risk form related risk factors that needed to be considered, and that a plan of care should be developed and implemented. Findings included: 1) The Facility Policy titled Smoking Policy-Residents, dated as last revised 3/2024, indicated that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-07-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. For Resident #1 the facility failed to maintain his/her dignity during the breakfast meal when a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) fed Resident #1 standing up, resulting in Resident #1 having to look up at the CNA. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility in June of 2008 and has diagnoses that include but not limited to hemiplegia unspecified affecting left nondominant side, traumatic brain injury, convulsions, contracture left hand, dysphagia, and dementia. Review of the Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) with an assessment reference date of 5/11/23 indicated Resident #1 scored a 3 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status Exam (BIMS) which indicated a severe cognitive impairment and required limited assistance of one person for eating. The surveyor made the following observations: -On 7/18/23 at 8:55 A.M., CNA #6 entered Resident #1's room and began to feed him/her in his/her bed. CNA #6 was standing above Resident #1's eye level and Resident #1 had to look up as he/she was being fed. - On 07/20/23…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-21 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews the facility failed to maintain a homelike environment by 1) replacing a broken television for 1 Resident (#20), 2) identifying and replacing a ripped and worn mattress for 1 Resident (#85) and 3) ensuring water temperatures were meeting warm temperature levels in the facility bathroom sinks, out of a total sample of 33 residents. Findings include: 1. Resident #20 was admitted to the facility in May 2008 with diagnoses including dementia, anxiety, and major depression. Review of Resident #20's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicates he/she has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3 out of a possible 15, indicating he/she has severe cognitive impairment. During an interview on 7/20/23 at 2:04 P.M., Resident #20 said he/she wanted to watch television and the television was not working. The Resident said he/she needed the television, and it hasn't been working all week. During an interview on 7/20/23 at 1:13 P.M., Certified Nursing Assistant…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and interviews, the facility 1) failed to implement the plan of care to off-load heels for 2 Residents (#8 and #47), 2) failed to develop a care plan for an orthotic device for 1 Resident (#54) and 3) failed to implement a care plan to provide padded side rails for 1 Resident (#39), out of a total sample of 33 residents. Findings include: 1 A. Resident #8 was admitted to the facility in January 2016 with diagnoses including dementia. Review of Resident #8's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicates the Resident has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3 out of a possible 15, indicating he/she has severe cognitive impairment. The MDS also indicates Resident #8 is dependent on staff for all bed mobility tasks. On 7/19/23 at 7:25 A.M., 8:20 A.M., and 1:00 P.M., Resident #8 was observed lying in bed. Both of his/her heels were directly on the mattress and not offloaded from pressure. On 7/20/23 at 8:19 A.M. and 10:00 A.M., Resident #8 was observed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-07-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2b. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility in June 2008 and has diagnoses that include but not limited to hemiplegia unspecified affecting left nondominant side, traumatic brain injury, convulsions, contracture left hand, dementia and dysphagia (difficulty in swallowing.) Review of the Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) with an assessment reference date of 5/11/23 indicated Resident #1 scored a 3 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status Exam (BIMS) indicating a severe cognitive impairment and requires limited assistance from one person for eating. On 7/18/23 beginning at 8:45 A.M., the surveyor made the following observations: -At 8:45 A.M., a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA #7) delivered a breakfast tray to Resident #1 consisting of puree food. CNA #7 set up the tray and left the room. -At 8:47 A.M., Resident #1 was alone in his/her room holding his/her meal tray ticket in his/her hand. -At 8:52 A.M., Resident #1 was observed holding a spoon with his/her eyes closed. Staff was observed passing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-07-21 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to provide an individualized activity program for 4 Residents (#61, #88 and #94) out of a total sample of 33 residents. Findings include: 1. Resident #61 was admitted to the facility in May 2016 with diagnoses including dementia, depression, anxiety, mild cognitive impairment, frontotemporal neurocognitive disorder, major depressive disorder, insomnia, Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated that Resident #61 was unable to complete a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) due to severe cognitive impairment. Further review of the MDS indicated Resident #61 requires extensive assistance and supervision with locomotion. Throughout all days of survey 7/18/23 through 7/21/23, Resident #61 was observed walking around the unit unsupervised wandering into empty dining rooms and hallways where staff were not present. There were no activity staff observed going into his/her room for one-on-one visits or to bring any activity…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-07-21 · tag F0730 — patternObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete annual Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) performance reviews for 5 of 5 sampled CNAs. Findings include: During review of 5 CNA employee records, the Surveyor was unable to locate annual performance reviews for CNA #1, CNA #2, CNA #3, CNA #10 and CNA #11. During an interview on 7/21/23 at approximately 9:30 A.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) said that CNA's are required to have annual performance reviews and was aware that the 5 CNA's reviewed did not have the required performance reviews completed.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to 1) properly store food items to prevent the risk of foodborne illness in accordance with professional standards for food service safety and 2) failed to ensure staff followed proper sanitation and food handling during meal service to prevent the potential outbreak of foodborne illness. Findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Food and Storage, dated 6/2018, indicated the following: *Food items, and supplies used in food preparation and service shall be stored in such a manner as to maintain safety and sanitation of the food or supply for human consumption as outlined in the Federal Drug Administration food code, state regulations, and city/county health codes. *Food products that are opened and not completely used; transferred from its original package to another storage container; or prepared at the facility and stored should be labeled as to its contents and used by dates. *Refrigerated, ready to eat food prepared on site that is held longer than 24 hours should be properly labeled with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-21 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to protect personal healthcare information on 1 out of 3 units. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Resident Rights, dated 12/2022, indicated the following: *Federal and state laws guarantee certain basic rights to all residents of the facility. These rights include the resident's right to: - privacy and confidentiality On 7/19/23 at 9:39 A.M. Nurse #1 left her medication cart unattended with the computer screen unlocked and visible to anyone in the hallway. Private healthcare information of the residents residing on the unit was visible to 2 housekeepers and 1 resident who walked by the screen. The screen was visible until 9:44, 5 minutes later. Nurse #1 left the screen unlocked and visible again between 9:45 A.M. and 9:53 A.M. During this time 3 residents walked by the screen where personal healthcare information could be seen. Nurse #3 left her screen unlocked and visible again from 10:03 A.M. to 10:07 A.M. During this period, 3 residents walked by the screen where personal healthcare information could…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-21 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure two Residents (#72 and 97) were free from restraints out of a total sample of 33 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to assess the use of pillows under the fitted sheet on both sides of the bed as a potential restraint. Findings include: Review of facility policy titled 'Use of Restraints' date revised 10/2022 indicated the following but not limited to: Policy: Restraints shall only be used for the safety and well-being of the resident (s) and only after other alternatives have been tried unsuccessfully. Restraints shall only be used to treat the resident's medical symptom (s) and never for discipline or staff convenience. Guidelines: * Physical Restraints are defined as any manual method or physical or mechanical device, material or equipment attached or adjacent to the resident's body that the individual cannot remove easily, which restricts freedom of movement or restricts normal access to one's body. *The definition of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-21 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, policy review and interviews, the facility failed to investigate a bruise of unknown origin in a suspicious area for 3 Residents (#30, #99 and #94) out of a total sample of 33 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse Investigation and Reporting, dated 6/2022, indicated the following: *All reports of resident abuse, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property, mistreatment and/or injuries of unknown source (abuse) shall be promptly reported to local, state and federal agencies and thoroughly investigated by facility management. * If an incident or suspected incident of resident abuse, mistreatment, exploitation, neglect or injury of unknown sources reported and will be investigated. * The individual conducting the investigation will, as a minimum: a. Review the completed documentation forms. b. Review the resident's medical record to determine events leading up to the incident; c. Interview the person(s) reporting the incident; d.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-21 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and interviews the facility failed to follow a physician order for prevention of pressure ulcer for one Resident (#47) out of a total sample of 33 residents. Findings include: Resident #47 was admitted to the facility in June 2023, with diagnoses including cerebral infarct (stroke) and generalized weakness, Review of Resident #47's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated the Resident has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 out of a possible 15, indicating he/she has moderately impaired cognition. The MDS further indicated Resident #47 requires extensive assistance of two person for bed mobility. Section M of the MDS indicated a stage 4 pressure ulcer (deep wounds that may impact muscle, tendons, ligaments, and bone) and the use of pressure reducing device bed/ chair. Review of the physician's orders indicated: -5/18/23 Low air loss mattress, check placement and functioning every shift set at 200. -5/4/23 Left lateral foot…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-21 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, policy review and interviews the facility failed to maintain a suprapubic catheter (a tube that drains urine directly through the abdominal wall) in a manner to reduce infection for one Resident (#97) out of a total 33 sampled residents. Findings Include: Review of facility policy titled 'Catheter Care of Indwelling Urinary' date last revised April,2018, indicated but not limited to the following: Policy: Catheter care will be performed at least daily and as needed (PRN) and in accordance with physician's and/or nursing orders. Guidelines: *Ensure that catheter tubing is secured to the thigh with leg strap and to prevent urinary tract infections caused by urinary reflux, always keep the drainage bag below the level of the residents bladder and off the floor. Position catheter tubing for straight drainage. Resident #97 was admitted to the facility in June 2023 with diagnoses including ESBL (Extended Spectrum Beta-Lactamase), Parkinson's disorder of the autonomic nervous system, chronic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-21 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to address significant weight loss for 1 Resident (#8) out of a total sample of 33 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Weight Management, dated 4/4/19, indicated the following: *All residents with significant weight changes will have verification of weight measurement for accuracy and documentation purposes. If verification of weight indicates significant weight change (suggested parameters for evaluating significance of unplanned and undesired weight loss are: 5% in 30 days, 7.5% in 90 days and 10% in 180 days) the resident and/or family representative and I DT will be notified in the plan of care will be revised as appropriate. *Residents with significant unintended weight changes will be added to weekly weights x 4 weeks or until weight stabilizes. *The registered dietitian will be responsible for determining the desirable body weight range. This will be documented on the initial medical nutrition therapy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-21 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to provide care and services consistent with professional standards for one Resident (#19) who required renal dialysis (a life sustaining treatment that helps your body remove extra fluid and waste products from your blood when the kidneys are not able to) out of a total sample of 33 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that clamps and pressure dressings were kept with the Resident (#51) for emergency related to a tunneled hemodialysis catheter (a plastic tube used for exchanging blood between a patient and a hemodialysis machine). Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled 'End-Stage Renal Disease, Care of a Resident with (sic)', last revised date November 2017, indicated the following but not limited to: Policy: Residents with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) will be cared for according to currently recognized standards of care. Guidelines: * Education and training of staff includes specifically: -Signs and symptoms of worsening condition and or implications of end stage renal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-21 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that 1 Resident's (#104) medication regimen was free from unnecessary drugs out of a total sample of 33 Residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Psychoactive Medication, dated 7/23, indicated The need to continue PRN (as needed) orders for psychotropic medications beyond 14 days requires that the practitioner document the rational for the extended order. The duration of the PRN order will be indicated in the order. Resident #104 was admitted to the facility in March 2023 with diagnoses including dementia, major depressive disorder, and hypertension. Review of Resident #104's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated he/she scored a 1 out of a possible 15 which indicated he/she had severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #104's July 2023 physician orders, start date of 3/17/23, indicated Ativan (benzodiazepine) oral tablet 0.5 mg (milligrams), Give one tablet by mouth every 6 hours as needed for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure that 1. the medication cart was locked and secured on 1 of 3 units observed and 2. medications were properly labeled after opening on 1 of 3 units observed. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Storage of Medications, dated 8/20, indicated Medications and biologicals are stored safely, securely, and properly. The medication supply is accessible only to licensed nursing personnel, pharmacy personnel, or staff members lawfully authorized to administer medications. Medications rooms, carts, and medication supplies are locked when they are not attended by persons with authorized access. 1. During an observation on 7/19/23 at 7:14 A.M., the surveyor observed the medication cart unlocked in the hallway with no staff present. During an interview on 7/19/23 at 7:16 A.M., Nurse #3 said that the medication cart should be locked at all times if the nurse is not present. Nurse #3 said that she left the medication cart open. During an interview on 7/20/23 at 11:22 A.M., the Director of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-21 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolatedProvide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide dental services for 1 Resident (#83) out of a total sample of 33 residents. Findings include: Resident #83 was admitted to the facility in February 2023 with diagnoses including Parkinson's Disease, dementia, anxiety, and major depressive disorder. Review of Resident #83's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicates that he/she has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of a possible 15, indicating he/she is cognitively intact. Further review of Resident #83's admission MDS indicated he/she had broken teeth. During an interview on 7/18/23 at 9:24 A.M., Resident #83 said he/she has not been seen by a dentist and he/she is missing 2 crowns. Resident #83 was asked if he/she reported it to staff, he/she said yes. Review of Resident #83's medical record indicated a doctor's order dated 2/16/23 for dental service consult. Further review of the medical record indicated a consent form for dental services…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-21 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure for 1 Resident (#92) out of a total sample of 33 residents, that food provided to the Resident met his/her individual needs. Resident #92 was admitted to the facility in November 2020 with diagnoses including dementia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated that Resident #92 was unable to complete a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). Further review of the MDS indicated Resident #92 requires physical assistance with eating. On 7/19/23 at 9:18 A.M., Resident #92 was observed walking around the unit unsupervised, eating from a small bag of chips. Resident #92 walked up and down the halls, in a back dining room area and turned back around and walked past several staff members. On 7/19/23 at 9:26 A.M., Resident #92 was observed walking around the unit and nurses' station unsupervised, eating from a small bag of chips. On 7/19/23 at 9:29 A.M., there were no bags of chips observed in Resident #92's room. Review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-21 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and meal tray ticket review, the facility failed to provide the dietary preferences for one Resident (#97) out of a total sample of 33 residents. Findings include: Resident #97 was admitted to the facility in June 2023 with diagnoses including dysphagia, metabolic encephalopathy. Review of Resident #97's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated the Resident was cognitively intact and scored a 15 out of possible 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score. On 7/18/23 at 11:40 A.M., Resident #97 said that he/she has food concerns as he/she dislikes potatoes and has been receiving potatoes with most of his/her meals. On 7/19/23 at 1:04 P.M., Resident #97 was observed in his/her bed with a lunch tray in front of him/her untouched. The tray had mashed potatoes as part of the lunch. The Resident stated he/she was not interested in having the meal. Review of the lunch meal ticket for 7/19/23 indicated Resident disliked potatoes. During an interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-21 · tag F0825 — isolatedProvide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility 1.) failed to ensure for one Resident (#54) that rehabilitation services were provided in accordance with the physician's order and after Resident #54 was provided a new orthotic, 2.) failed to ensure physical therapy was provided to one Resident (#158) in accordance with the physical therapy treatment plan of care, and 3.) failed to provide Occupational Therapy for one Resident (#97) in accordance with the occupational therapy treatment plan of care, out of a total sample of 33 residents. Findings include: 1. For Resident #54 the facility failed to ensure physical therapy services were provided per the physician's order and after Resident #54 was provided an orthotic device for his/her right ankle following an appointment with an orthopedic doctor. Resident #54 was admitted to the facility in December 2018 and has diagnoses that include but not limited to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, unspecified abnormalities of gait and mobility and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-21 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure an accurate medical record for 1 Resident (#1), out of a total sample of 33 residents. Specifically, Nursing staff documented that Resident #1 was administered a left-hand roll splint. Findings include: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility in June 2008 and has diagnoses that include but not limited to hemiplegia unspecified affecting left nondominant side, traumatic brain injury, convulsions, contracture left hand, dysphagia, and dementia. Review of the Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) with an assessment reference date of 5/11/23 indicated Resident #1 scored a 3 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status Exam (BIMS) indicating a severe cognitive impairment and is dependent on staff for daily care including bed mobility, transfers, bathing, dressing and hygiene. On 7/18/23 Resident #1 was observed resting in bed. The fingers on his/her left hand were curled in and contracted. There was no device observed. Review of Resident #1's medical record on 7/18/23 indicated the following: -A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and observations, the facility failed to disinfect shared resident equipment during medication pass. Findings include: On 7/19/23 at 7:45 A.M., Nurse #5 was observed going into a resident's room and measure his/her blood pressure. The nurse returned to his medication cart and placed the blood pressure machine on the cart. He did not disinfect the blood pressure machine. On 7/19/23 at 8:15 A.M., Nurse #5 was observed going into a different resident's room, the surveyor stopped Nurse #5 before he could reach the resident for blood pressure measurements. During an interview on 7/19/23 at 8:17 A.M., Nurse #5 said he should have disinfected the blood pressure machine as it is shared medical equipment. During an interview on 7/20/23 at 11:31 A.M., the Director of Nursing said the facility's expectation is that shared medical equipment should be sanitized after each use.
- No harm found · B2026-02-09 · tag F0628 — patternProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide written documentation related to transfer discharge notices and bed hold policy to the responsible person/invoked Health Care Proxy (HCP) upon five hospitalizations for one Resident (#8), out of a total of 23 sampled residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Transfer and Discharge Documentation, dated as last revised 7/2024, indicated if a resident was being transferred or discharged because his/her needs cannot be met at the facility, documentation will include: The specific resident needs that cannot be met and that appropriate notice was provided to the resident and/or legal guardian. Resident #8 was admitted to the facility in June 2025 with diagnoses which include depression, vascular dementia with or without behavioral disturbances, and Alzheimer's dementia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 12/19/25, indicated Resident #8 scored 3 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) Assessment, indicating he/she had severe cognitive impairment. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2026-02-09 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (#82), out of a total sample of 23 residents received food prepared in a form to meet the resident's individual dietary needs. Specifically, the facility failed to upgrade his/her diet per the Speech Language Pathologist (SLP) order for 14 days. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Therapeutic Diets and Meal Plans, dated as last revised 6/2018, indicated but was not limited to the following:-The attending physician, license non-physician provider, or registered or licensed dietician with physician approval and as allowable by State Law, prescribe therapeutic diets.-Mechanically Altered Diet means one in which the texture of a diet is altered. When the texture is modified, the type of texture modification must be specific and part of the physician's or delegated registered or licensed dietician order.-The Speech Language Pathologist (SLP) may be consulted for evaluation of mechanically altered diets.-A physician's order is obtained for the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2024-10-30 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a Notice of Transfer/Discharge was issued to two Residents (#16 and #25), out of a sample of 39 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to notify the Resident/Resident Representative in writing for the reason of transfer and send a copy of the notice to the ombudsman when emergently transferred to the hospital. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Bed Holds/Returns, last revised 5/2018, indicated but was not limited to: -Prior to transfers and therapeutic leaves, residents or resident representatives will be informed in writing of the bed hold and return policy. -Prior to a transfer, written information will be given to the residents and/or the resident representatives that explains in detail: -The rights and limitations of the resident regarding bed-holds; -The reserve bed payment policy as indicated by the state plan; -The facility per diem rate required to hold a bed, or to hold a bed beyond the state bed-hold period -The details of the transfer (per the Notice of Transfer) 1. Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2024-10-30 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a Bed Hold Policy Notice was issued upon transfer to the hospital for two Residents (#16 and #25), out of a sample of 39 residents and two discharge records reviewed. Specifically, the facility failed to provide written notice of the facility's bed-hold policy to the resident/resident representative when transferred to the hospital. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Bed Holds/Returns, last revised 5/2018, indicated, but was not limited to: -Prior to transfers and therapeutic leaves, residents or resident representatives will be informed in writing of the bed hold and return policy. -Prior to a transfer, written information will be given to the residents and/or the resident representatives that explains in detail: -The rights and limitations of the resident regarding bed-holds; -The reserve bed payment policy as indicated by the state plan; -The facility per diem rate required to hold a bed, or to hold a bed beyond the state bed-hold period -The details of the transfer (per the Notice of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$110,264 in federal fines across 5 penalties.
- $8,281 — penalty dated 2026-02-09
- $15,330 — penalty dated 2026-02-09
- $56,789 — penalty dated 2024-10-30
- $16,071 — penalty dated 2024-05-09
- $13,793 — penalty dated 2023-10-11
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to NEXT STEP HEALTHCARE — 14 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 1.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 1.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 2.6 | +1.4 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 2.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
The other 13 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.7★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| DELL'ANNO, DAMIAN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 09/01/2017 |
| STEPHAN, WILLIAM | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 09/01/2017 |
| NEXT STEP HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/01/2025 |
| GOWDA, SAVITHA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/22/2024 |
| WOOLFE, ELISABETH | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/07/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $654K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Massachusetts Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 225343. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-09, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.