West Newton Healthcare
25 Armory Street, West Newton, MA 02465 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 123 certified beds · (617) 969-2300 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Feb 2024
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (85) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $184,166 in federal fines (most recent 2024-02-02)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 4.5% | 16.4% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 8.7% | 5.1% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.9% | 0.8% | 0.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.1% | 1.8% | 2.0% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 41.9% | 15.5% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 1.1% | 0.1% | 0.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.6% | 3.4% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 4.4% | 15.4% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 11.0% | 19.5% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 96.2% | 94.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 7.9% | 4.2% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 25.5% | 21.2% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 16.5% | 21.4% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.4% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 63.0% | 77.7% | 79.4% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.79 | 1.88 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.75 | 1.50 | 1.80 | typical |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.05 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 2% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.8%CMS range 6.9–14.7 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.0%CMS range 3.6–12.0 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.90 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 123 beds and averages 98.1 residents a day — about 80% occupied, or roughly 25 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.49 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.66 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.03 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.22 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.60 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.75 to 0.44 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
85 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 74 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-02-02 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure physician's orders were followed for prevention of pressure ulcer development for one Resident (#91) out of a total sample of 40 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to implement heel booties as ordered resulting in a reddened area on the Resident's left heel and a deep tissue pressure injury on the right heel and failed to implement the correct setting for an air mattress. Findings include: Review of facility policy titled 'Pressure Ulcer/Injury Risk Assessment', last revised April 2018, indicated the following but not limited to: *Risk factors that increase a resident's susceptibility to develop, or to not heal, a pressure ulcer or pressure injuries include: a. Under nutrition, malnutrition, and dehydration deficits. b. Impaired/decrease mobility and decreased functional ability. Review of facility policy titled Support Surface Guidelines, last revised May 2018, indicated the following but not limited to: *Support…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-06-04 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — patternProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on records reviewed and interviews for two of three sampled residents (Resident #2 and Resident #3), who were at risk for developing Diabetes-related foot complications, the Facility failed to ensure they received proper care and treatment to maintain good foot health.Findings include:During an interview on 06/04/26 at 1:20 P.M., the Director of Clinical Operations said the Facility did not have a policy related to the care and services for a resident with Diabetes or a policy for Diabetic foot care.1) Resident #2 was admitted to the facility in December 2025 diagnoses included Diabetes Mellitus with diabetic neuropathy (damage or dysfunction to the nerves). Review of Resident #2's medical record indicated there was no documentation to support that the nursing staff obtained a physician's order to administer diabetic foot care to him/her nightly.Review of Resident #2's Treatment Administration Records for the months of February 2026 through June 2026, indicated there was no documentation to support diabetic foot care was being provided. 2) Resident #3 was admitted to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed, interviews, and observations, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who was readmitted to the facility from the hospital with a new diagnosis of seizures, the facility failed to ensure they developed and implemented a comprehensive individualized care plan specific to his/her associated risk of seizure activity, that included interventions, goals and outcomes. Findings include:Review of the facility's policy, titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, with a revision date of 01/2024, indicated the following:-A comprehensive, person-centered care plan will be developed for each resident. The care plan will include objectives that meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs and is developed for each resident.-Evaluation of residents is ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the resident and the resident's conditions change.Resident #1 was admitted to the facility in April 2026 diagnoses included dementia and chronic kidney…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled Residents (Resident #1) who was experiencing an emergent change in condition, the facility failed to ensure quality of care was provided when multiple facility staff members did not know the access code to the elevator and Emergency Medical Services (EMS) were delayed in transporting him/her to the Hospital Emergency Department (ED) for evaluation and treatment. Findings include:Review of the Report submitted via the Health Care Facility Reporting System (HCFRS), dated 04/22/26, indicated that on 04/19/26 Resident #1 experienced a medical emergency and Emergency Medical Services (EMS) were unable to release the elevator in a timely manner due to code [series of numbers required to be enter into the keypad located inside the elevator] not being provided [by facility staff] in a timely manner. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility in April 2026, diagnosis included dementia. Review of Resident #1's Nursing Progress Note, dated 04/19/26, indicated he/she had an episode of vomiting, shaking, facial twitching and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who was assessed as being at increased risk for elopement, had cognitive impairment, and required supervision for ambulation, the Facility failed to ensure that they provided adequate staff supervision to maintain Resident #1's safety, when on 04/09/26, Resident was transported to the hospital for an out-patient medical appointment without an escort, he/she eloped from the hospital, and was later found at the police station approximately four miles away from the hospital.Findings include: Resident #1 was admitted to the Facility in November 2024, diagnoses included muscle weakness, depression, anxiety disorder, and mild cognitive impairment.Review of a Guardianship document (Decree and Order of Appointment of Guardian for an Incapacitated Person), dated 08/28/24, indicated that Resident #1 had a legal guardianship in place.Review of Resident #1's Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated Resident #1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure four Residents (#5, #62, #98 and #9), out of a total sample of 27 residents, received the necessary care and treatment, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent the development of pressure ulcers. Specifically: 1. For Resident #5 who had a stage 4 pressure ulcer (full Thickness and tissue loss appears as full thickness skin and tissue loss with exposed or directly palpable fascia, muscle, tendon, ligament, cartilage or bone in the ulcer) the facility failed to consistently implement a physician's ordered air mattress.2. For Resident #62, who had a stage 3 pressure ulcer, the facility failed to ensure that the wound doctor's treatment orders were being followed as recommended.3. For Resident #98, the facility failed to ensure that the air mattress was set to 100 pounds as per the physician's order.4. For Resident #9, who is assessed to be at high risk for developing pressure ulcer/injuries, the facility failed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-18 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — patternProvide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure dental services were provided for four Residents (#51, #81, #73, #72) out of a total sample of 27 Residents. Specifically, the facility failed to:1. Ensure Resident #51 was provided with consent to be seen by dental services resulting in the Resident not being seen by a dentist while residing in the facility for one year.2. Ensure Resident #81 was seen by dental services following a physician's order.3. Ensure Resident #73 had follow up as required following a dental visit.4. Ensure Resident #72 was seen by dental services following a physician's order. Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled Ancillary Physician Services, dated and revised March 2025, indicated the following: - Routine dental services are available to meet the resident's health needs. - Routine dental services are provided to our residents through: a contract agreement with a licensed Dentist that come to the facility routinely. - Social Services or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-18 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to have an effective immunization program in place for 11 Residents out of a total sample of 27 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the influenza vaccine was administered as soon as in became available. Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled Influenza Vaccine, dated as revised 11/5/20, indicated all residents who have no medical contraindications to the vaccine will be offered the influenza vaccine annually to encourage and promote the benefits associated with vaccinations against influenza.-Administration of the influenza vaccine will be made in accordance with current Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendations at the time of vaccination.-Between October 1st and March 31st each year, the influenza vaccine shall be offered to residents unless the vaccine is medically contraindicated, or the resident has already been immunized.-Residents admitted to the facility between October 1st and March 31st shall be offered the vaccine.-Prior to the vaccination, the resident or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that Residents on the third-floor unit were provided with a dignified existence. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that staff members were not using their personal cellphones in the Resident Dining Room while Residents were occupying it. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Resident Rights, dated and revised January 2024 indicated the following:- Employees shall treat all residents with kindness, respect and dignity- Federal and state laws guarantee certain basic rights to all residents of this facility. These rights include the resident's right to a dignified existence. During the survey period, the surveyor made the following observations:On 12/15/25 at 10:48 A.M., multiple Residents were observed sitting at the table in the dining room, a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was standing, leaning against the counter with her cellphone in her hand not interacting with any Residents. On 12/16/25 at 10:30 A.M., multiple Residents were observed sitting at tables in the dining room, a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to accurately complete the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for one Resident (#2), out of 27 sampled residents. Specifically, for Resident #2 the facility failed to code a fall with major injury (subacute L1 fracture, a bone in the lumbar spine). Findings include: Resident #2 was admitted to the facility in January 2023 with diagnoses including traumatic brain injury, abnormal posture, and a history of falling. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/10/25, indicated that Resident #2 had a severe cognitive impairment as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3 out of 15. This MDS indicated Resident #2 had one fall with minor injury. Review of the RAI manual, dated October 2025, indicated a major injury is a fall including bone fractures. Review of Resident #2's incident report, dated 7/30/25 at 9:30 P.M., indicated:-he/she was found with half his/her face on the floor and lying on his/her left side by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that Activities of Daily Living were provided for dependent Residents for three Residents (#57, #88, #13) out of a total sample of 27 Residents. Specifically, the facility failed to:1. Ensure incontinent care was provided in a timely manner for Resident #57, who is assessed as incontinent of bladder and bowel, resulting in Resident #57 sitting in a soiled brief for an extended period. 2. Ensure that incontinent care was provided within a timely manner for Resident #88 who is assessed as incontinent of bowel and bladder resulting in Resident #88 sitting in a soiled brief for an extended period.3. Ensure that Resident #13 was supervised during mealtimes as indicated by the plan of care. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Activities of Daily Living (ADLS), Supporting, dated and revised November 2024, indicated the following: - Residents will be provided with care, treatment and services as appropriate to maintain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 74 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to provide and implement an ongoing activities program for one Resident (#88) to meet his/her needs for engagement in meaningful activities, out of a total sample of 27 residents.Findings include:The surveyor requested a policy on Resident Activities, but the facility said they do not have a Resident Activities policy.Resident #88 was admitted to the facility in April 2020 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, dementia, chronic kidney disease stage 3b, anxiety disorder and heart failure. Review of Resident #88's most recent Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) dated [DATE] indicating that the Resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 2 out of 15 indicating severe cognitive impairment. Further review of the MDS indicated that the Resident requires substantial/maximal assistance with toileting hygiene, substantial/maximal assistance with toilet transfer, and staff assistance with walking. Review of Resident #88's most…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure professional standards in quality of care for one Resident (#87), out of a total sample of 27 residents. Specifically, for Resident #87, the facility failed to identify skin injuries on the soles of Resident #87's feet. Findings include: Resident #87 was admitted to the facility in March 2023 and has diagnoses that include but are not limited to iron deficiency anemia, furuncle unspecified (a pus-filled skin abscess of a hair follicle caused by a bacterial infection), an open abdominal wound, malignant neoplasm of the liver and bile duct, impulsiveness, adult failure to thrive, and dementia.Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set assessment dated as submitted 10/16/25 indicated Resident #87 scored a 7 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status exam indicating he/she has severe cognitive impairment. Further the MDS indicated Resident #87 required partial/moderate assistance for lower body dressing, including footwear and displayed other behaviors 4-6 days in the look back period and rejection…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one Resident (#43), out of a total sample of 27 residents, received proper treatment to maintain vision ability. Specifically, the facility failed to implement Resident #43's ophthalmologist's recommendations for a prednisolone eye drop taper (medication used to treat non-infectious eye inflammations, including those caused by surgery) and to discontinue Cosopt (eye drop used to lower raised pressure in the eye and treat glaucoma, a disease that is caused by increased pressure inside the eye, resulting in vision loss if untreated) after eye surgery. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Ancillary Physician's Services, dated 3/2025, indicated routine optometry, podiatry, dental and audiology services are available to meet the resident's health needs. 2. Residents have the right to select an optometrist of their choice when services are needed. 3. Selected optometrists will be available to provide follow up care per…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status for one Resident (#11) out of a total sample of 27 Residents. Specifically, the facility failed to obtain a re-weigh in a reasonable amount of time after a significant weight loss was identified.Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled Weight Measurement, dated and revised April 2019 indicated the following:- All Residents with significant weight changes will have verification of weight measurement for accuracy and documentation purposed. If verification of weight indicates significant weight change (suggested parameters for evaluation significance of unplanned and undesired weight loss are: 5% in 30 days, 7.5% in 90 days and 10% in 180 days) the resident and/or family representative and IDT will be notified and plan of care will be revised as appropriate.Resident #11 was admitted to the facility in July 2025 with diagnoses including adult failure to thrive, dementia and type 2 diabetes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that respiratory care and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, were provided for one Resident (#56) out of sample of 27 residents. Specifically, for Resident #56, the facility failed to obtain physician's orders for oxygen use. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Oxygen Administration, dated as revised 1/2024, indicated the purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for safe oxygen administration. Preparation1. Verify there is a physician's order in place. Review the physician's order or facility protocol for oxygen administration. Resident #56 admitted to the facility in December 2025 with diagnoses including anoxic brain injury, tracheostomy (surgically created airway opening) status, and pressure ulcer of the sacral region. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/9/25, indicated that Resident #56 had severe cognitive impairment as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 0 out of 15. This MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for one Resident #85 out of a total sample of 27 residents. For Resident #85, when the facility staff failed to wear the appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) while providing direct care for the Resident on enhanced barrier precautions due to a suprapubic catheter (a flexible tube that drains urine directly from the bladder through a small opening in the lower abdomen). Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Infection Control Guidelines for Nursing Procedures, dated as revised 7/2024, indicated to provide guidelines for general infection control while care for residents.-Enhanced Barrier PrecautionsEnhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) are an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews the facility failed to ensure a dignified dining experience for two Residents (#23, #50) out of a total sample of 24 residents and on 2 of 3 nursing units. Specifically: 1. For Resident #23, who is dependent on staff for feeding, the staff failed to ensure the resident was positioned properly to eat and was provided with the assist he/she needed, resulting in the resident eating with his/her hands and staring at meals without assistance. 2. For Resident #50, who is dependent on staff for feeding, the staff failed to ensure assistance with feeding was promptly provided when meals were served, resulting in the Resident watching others eat while he/she waited for long periods for assistance. 3a. In the 3rd floor unit dining room staff failed to provide a dignified dining experience and referred to residents as feeders, rather than by their name. 3b. In the 2nd floor unit dining room a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) sat on the arm of a chair in the dining room while feeding a resident lunch, rather than seated at eye level. Findings include: The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-10 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to meet professional standards of practice for three Residents (#14, #35 and #74) out of a total of sample of 24 residents. Specifically: 1. For Resident #14 the facility failed to follow-up on rising abnormal PSA (prostate surface antigen). A potential indicator of cancer levels. 2. For Resident #35 the facility failed to ensure nursing clarified a physician's order for medications that were ordered orally and Resident #35 received medications via g-tube (tube inserted into the stomach). 3. For Resident #74 the facility failed to ensure nursing clarified a physician's order for g-tube flushes (two different frequencies in one order). Findings include: 1. Resident #14 was admitted to the facility in October 2022 with diagnoses including schizophrenia, stroke and diabetes. Review of the facility document titled Lab Results Report, dated 6/18/24, indicated a PSA level of 12.280. (Normal is below 5.4) Review of the facility document titled Consultation/Clinic Referral Urology, dated 10/16/24, indicated Resident #14…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) were provided to three Residents (#23, #5, and #7) out of a total sample of 24 residents. Specifically: 1. For Resident #23 the facility failed to ensure assistance with bed mobility and dining was provided as needed. 2. For Resident #5 the facility failed to ensure assistance with positioning and feeding was provided as needed. 3. For Resident #7 the facility failed to ensure assistance with grooming was provided as needed. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), Supporting, dated as revised 11/2024, indicated the following: -Appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADLs independently, with the consent of the resident and in accordance with the plan of care, including appropriate support and assistance with: a. Hygiene (bathing, dressing, grooming, and oral care); b. Mobility (transfers and ambulation, including walking); c. Elimination (toileting); d.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-10 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — patternProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure laboratory services were provided for one Resident (#7) out of a sample of 24 Residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure routine labs were obtained according to the physician's orders. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Lab and Diagnosis Test Results - Clinical Protocol, dated 2/2020, indicated the following: 1. The physician will identify, and order diagnosis and lab testing based on the resident's diagnostic and monitoring needs. 2. The staff will process test requisitions and arrange for tests. Resident #7 was admitted to the facility in July 2024 with diagnoses including dementia, tracheostomy, diabetes, and seizures. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/4/24, indicated that Resident #7 was comatose. Review of Resident #7's current physician's order, with a start date of 7/4/24, indicated: -CBC, CMP, LFT, Magnesium, and phosphorus every Tuesday and Thursday. (CBC, complete blood count is a blood test that measures amounts and sizes of your red…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to adhere to safe food practices to prevent contamination of food and beverage items intended for resident consumption in the facility's main kitchen. Specifically, the facility failed to implement safe food practices in the main kitchen relative to discarding food that was spoiled and labeling/dating guidelines. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Food and Supply Storage, dated as revised 6/2018, indicated food, non-food items, and supplies used in food preparation and service shall be stored in such a manner as to maintain safety and sanitation of the food or supply for human consumption as outlined in the Federal Drug Administration Food Code, state regulations, and city/county health codes. Guidelines 2. Labeling and rotating food supply a. Food products that are opened and not completely used; transferred from its original package to another storage container; or prepared at the facility and stored should be labeled as to its contents and used by dates. b. Rotate food products (dry, refrigerated, or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for two Resident (#16, #88) out of a total sample of 24 residents and on 1 of 3 resident units. Specifically: 1. For Resident #16, the facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) due to a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) line. 2. For Resident #88, the facility failed to implement EBP due to an external dialysis catheter 3. The facility failed to ensure that during meal pass, soiled dishware was not put back in the carts with meals awaiting delivery to residents. Findings Include: Review of facility policy, titled Infection Control Guidelines for Nursing Procedures, dated as revised 7/2024, indicated the following: -Policy: To provide guidelines for general infection control while caring for residents. -Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) are an infection…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-10 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — patternRegularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed identify and minimize areas of possible entrapment in resident beds. Specifically for Resident #74, out of a total of 24 sampled residents, the facility failed to conduct routine inspections on his/her bed frame and mattress to identify possible areas of entrapment. The facility failed also failed to conduct routine inspections of all bed frames and mattresses to identify possible areas of entrapment for 94 resident beds. Findings include: Review of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Hospital Bed System Dimensional and Assessment Guidance to Reduce Entrapment, dated 3/10/2006, indicated: The term entrapment describes an event in which a resident is caught, trapped, or entangled in the space in or about the bed rail, mattress, or hospital bed frame. Resident entrapments may result in deaths and serious injuries. There are 7 zones of bed entrapment: Zone 1 (within the rail), Zone 2 (under the rail), Zone 3 (between rail and mattress), Zone 4 (Under the rail, at the ends of the rail), Zone 5 (between split bed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed file a grievance for one Resident (#7), out of a total sample of 24 residents. Specifically, the facility staff failed to ensure the Social Worker (SW) filed a grievance on behalf of Resident #7's Guardian who expressed care concerns. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Grievances, dated 2/2024, indicated that it is the policy of this facility to make information about how to file a grievance available to residents and/or residents representatives. The contact information of the grievance official (Administrator or designee), as well as contact information of independent entities, with whom a complaint can be filed are posted and available to residents. -Guidelines 4. Any resident, and/or health care representative, family member, employee, or appointed advocate may file a grievance without fear of discrimination or reprisal in any form. -Procedure 1. If a resident, and/or health care representative, or another interested family member of a resident has a complaint, a staff member will inform…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to identify and assess the use of an abdominal binder as a potential restraint for one Resident (#74) out of a total sample of 24 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Use of Restraints, dated as revised 1/24, indicated that restraints shall only be used for the safety and well-being of the residents) and only after other alternatives have been tried unsuccessfully. Restraints shall only be used to treat the resident's medical symptoms) and never for discipline or staff convenience, or for the prevention of falls. -Guidelines 1. Physical Restraints are defined as any manual method, physical or mechanical device, material or equipment attached or adjacent to the resident's body that the individual cannot remove easily, which restricts freedom of movement or restricts normal access to one's body. 2. The definition of a restraint is based on the functional status of the resident and not the device. If the resident cannot remove a device in the same manner in which the staff applied it…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were coded accurately for one Resident (#26) out of a total sample of 24 Residents. Specifically, for Resident #26 the facility failed to code oxygen use on the MDS assessment. Findings include: Resident #26 was admitted to the facility in October 2022 with diagnoses including emphysema, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and anxiety. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/8/24, indicated that Resident #26 was cognitively intact as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status exam score of 14 out of 15. The MDS further indicated Resident #26 required assistance with activities of daily living and did not require oxygen administration. Review of Resident #26's physician's progress note, dated 11/1/24, indicated Resident has a history of severe COPD with chronic oxygen use at 2 liters per minute. Review of Resident #26's current physician's order, with a start date of 11/11/23, indicated: -Obtain oxygen saturation every shift and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure they developed and implemented a comprehensive person-centered care plan for four Residents (#90, #73, #24, #74) out of a total sample of 24 residents. Specifically: 1. For Resident #90 the facility failed to ensure the bed was in the lowest position and floor mats were in place when the resident was in bed, as ordered by the physician. 2. For Resident #73 the facility failed to develop a person-centered comprehensive care plan for a diagnosis of history of suicidal ideation. 3. For Resident #24 the facility failed to develop a care plan for the use of psychotropic medications. 4. For Resident #74 the facility failed to implement padded side rails. Findings include: 1. Resident #90 was admitted to the facility in May 2024 and has diagnoses that include dementia without behavioral disturbance and muscle weakness. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 9/30/24, indicated that Resident #90 was assessed by staff to have severe cognitive impairment, The MDS further indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure care plans were reviewed with the interdisciplinary team (IDT) as required for two Residents (#35 and #61) out of a total sample of 24 residents. Specifically, 1. For Resident #35 the facility failed to review and revise the care plan related to the oxygen flow rate for a tracheostomy (surgical incision in the neck to the windpipe to create an airway). 2. For Resident #61 the facility failed to review and revise the care plan related to protective equipment used for smoking (smoking apron). Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person- Centered, dated as revised 1/24, indicated a comprehensive, person-centered care plan will be developed for each resident. The care plan will include objectives that meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed for each resident. 1. The Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) in conjunction with the resident and his/her family or legal representative, may assist with the development of a comprehensive,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure vision services were provided for one Resident (#6) out of a total sample of 24 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure arrangements were made to repair eyeglasses for Resident #6. Findings include: Resident #6 was admitted to the facility in March 2022 and has diagnoses that include absolute glaucoma and artificial left eye. Review of Resident #6's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/6/24, indicates that Resident #6 has moderately impaired vision and wears corrective lenses. On the Brief Interview for Mental Status exam Resident #6 scored a 6 out of a possible 15, indicating severely impaired cognition. The MDS further indicated Resident #6 has no behavior of rejecting care. Review of the current communication care plan for Resident #6 includes the following intervention: -Ensure hearing amplifier aid/glasses or other assistive devices are in place, start date 4/19/22. Review of the clinical progress notes indicates a note written by nursing, dated 8/25/24: -Social…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure nursing implemented interventions for pressure ulcer care for one Resident (#61) out of a total sample of 24 Residents. Specifically for Resident #61 the facility failed to ensure that nursing implemented physician's ordered Prevalon boots and failed to consistently elevate his/her heels off the bed. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Prevention and management of Pressure Ulcers/ Injuries, dated as revised 11/24, indicated the purpose of this policy is to ensure a resident receives care consistent with professional standard of practice to prevent pressure ulcers and/or residents with pressure ulcer receive necessary treatment and services consistent with professional standards of practice to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing. -Definitions: Pressure Ulcer/Injury (PU/PI) refers to localized damage to the skin and/or underlying soft tissue usually over a bony prominence or related to a medical or other device. *Stage 3 Pressure Injury:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to consistently provide range of motion (ROM) care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice for one Resident (#35) out of a total sample of 24 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure staff obtained physician's orders for bilateral hand splints (a device to properly position and protect hand joints) use based on the Occupational Therapist's recommendation. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person- Centered, dated as revised 1/24, indicated a comprehensive, person- centered care plan will be developed for each resident. The care plan will include objectives that meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed for each resident. 1. The Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) in conjunction with the resident and his/her family or legal representative, may assist with the development of a comprehensive, care plan for each resident. 2. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status for one Resident (#88) out of a total sample of 24 residents. Specifically, for Resident #88 the facility failed to obtain weights as ordered and identify and address potential significant weight changes by not reviewing post dialysis weights and reweighing the resident in a timely manner to confirm a significant weight change. Findings Include: Review of facility policy titled Weight Management, dated as revised 4/4/19 indicated the following: -Weights will be obtained weekly x 4 after admission. Subsequent weights will be monthly unless physician's orders or the resident's condition warrants more frequent as determined by the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT). -All residents with significant weight changes will have verification of weight measurement for accuracy and documentation purposes. -If the resident refuses weighing or circumstances prevent weighing the resident, the IDT will document the reason in the resident's medical record and care plan. Make attempt to weigh…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that respiratory care and services consistent with professional standards of practice, were provided for one Resident (#26), out of a total sample of 24 Residents. Specifically for Resident #26 the facility failed to ensure nursing a.) consistently set his/her oxygen flow rate as ordered by the physician and b.) nursing changed nebulizer machine tubing as ordered by the physician. Findings include: Resident #26 was admitted to the facility in October 2022 with diagnoses including emphysema, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and anxiety. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/8/24, indicated that Resident #26 was cognitively intact as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15. This MDS further indicated Resident #26 required assistance with activities of daily living. a.) Review of the policy, Oxygen Administration, dated as revised 1/24, indicated the purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for safe oxygen…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure a care plan was developed for Trauma Informed Care, with resident specific triggers and interventions, for three Residents (#2, #73, and #78) out of a total sample of 24 residents. Findings include: The facility policy titled Trauma Informed Care, dates as revised 10/19, indicated the following: Preparation: 1. Staff are provided in-service training about trauma, its impact on health, and post-traumatic stress disorder in the context of the healthcare setting. 2. Nursing staff are trained on screening tools, trauma assessment and how to identify triggers associated with re-traumatization. 3. Staff are guided in evidence-based organizational and interpersonal strategies that support trauma informed care. General guidelines: 1. The facility supports a culture of emotional well-being and physical safety for staff, residents, and visitors. 2. Trauma-informed care is culturally sensitive, and person centered 3. Caregivers are taught strategies to help eliminate, mitigate, or sensitively address a residents' triggers. 1.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure that bilateral side rails were implemented in accordance with the care plan, for one Resident (#74) out of a total sample of 24 residents. Findings include: Resident #74 was admitted to the facility in January 2023 with diagnoses including traumatic brain injury, history of falling, and muscle weakness. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/18/24, indicated that Resident #74 was rarely/ never understood. The MDS further indicated Resident #74 was dependent on staff for activities of daily living. On 1/6/25 at 7:36 A.M., 1/7/25 at 6:39 A.M., and on 1/9/25 at 6:44 A.M., the surveyor observed Resident #74 in his/her bed. The bilateral side rails were in the middle of the bed. There was 31 inches from the headboard to the top of the side rail, the side rail measured 25 inches, and then there was 27 inches between the bottom of the side rail and the foot of the bed. Review of Resident #74's plan of care related to activities of daily living, dated as revised 1/25/23, indicated:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure it was free from a medication error rate of greater than 5% when one out of four nurses observed made 10 errors out of 43 opportunities, resulting in a medication error rate of 20.93%. Those errors impacted two Residents (#34 and #77). Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Administering Medications, dated as revised 9/2024, indicated that medications are administered in a safe and timely manner and as prescribed. Further review indicated that medications may be administered one hour before or after the prescribed time, unless otherwise specified. 1. Resident #34 was admitted to the facility in March 2015 with diagnoses including diabetes, Alzheimer's and high blood pressure. On 1/7/25, at 8:25 A.M. the surveyor observed Nurse #10 administer the following medications to Resident #34: -Aspirin Enteric Coated 81 mg. (milligrams) one tablet; -Metformin 500 mg. one tablet; and -Vitamin D 10 mg one tablet. Review of Resident #34's physician's orders dated January 2025, indicated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were stored in accordance with accepted professional standards of practice. Specifically: 1. A medication nurse gave the keys, including narcotic keys to an unassigned staff nurse, providing that nurse access to their medication cart; and 2. Nursing failed to secure the medication cart on 1 of 3 nursing units. Findings include: 1. On 1/6/25 at 8:26 A.M., a nurse entered the 3rd floor dining room, asked Nurse #1 for the keys to his medication cart. The nurse then walked across the room to Nurse #1's medication cart, unlocked the cart, briefly accessed the cart, then locked it and returned the keys to Nurse #1. While the nurse was in Nurse #1's cart, Nurse #1 had his back to the cart and was assisting a resident. During an interview with the Director of Clinical Operations #1 on 1/7/25 at 2:22 P.M., she said that it is her expectation that nurses maintain the keys to their own medication cart and not allow other nurses to access the cart. She said the nurse that has the keys to a cart is responsible…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide dental services for one Resident (#85) out of a total sample of 24 residents. Findings include: Review of the policy titled Dental Services, dated as revised 11/2017, indicated: -Routine and emergency dental services are available to meet the resident's oral health services in accordance with the resident's assessment and plan of care. -All dental services provided are recorded in the resident's medical record. Resident #85 was admitted to the facility in January 2024 with diagnoses including kidney disease, heart disease and alcohol use. Review of the January 2025 Physician's orders for Resident #85 indicated an order dated 1/19/24: may have dental consults. Review of the progress note, dated 12/6/24, indicated that right before dinner the Resident stated that (he/she) was having mouth discomfort. Upon examination, this writer noted some redness/inflammation on the gums around the base of one of the Resident's front teeth. PA (physician's assistant) notified and ordered 500 mg of Amoxicillin three…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure accuracy of the medical record for two Residents (#90 and #88) out of a total sample of 24 residents. Specifically: 1. For Resident #90 nursing documented in the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) that a bed was in the lowest position and that fall mats were in place when they were not; and 2. for Resident #88 the facility failed to accurately document in the Medication Administration Record (MAR) when medications were administered. Findings include: 1. Resident #90 was admitted to the facility in May 2024 and has diagnoses that include dementia without behavioral disturbance and muscle weakness. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 9/30/24, indicated that Resident #90 was assessed by staff to have severe cognitive impairment. The MDS further indicated Resident #90 required substantial to maximal assist with bed mobility. Review of the most recent Nursing Evaluation, dated 12/23/24, indicated Resident #90 had sustained 1-2 falls within the last six months. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-02 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — widespreadProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide an ongoing program of individual and group activities designed to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental and psychosocial well-being for Residents on three of three nursing units. Findings include: The facility failed to provide the surveyors of a policy for the provision of activities. During initial interviews multiple residents said that there were no activities available to residents. One resident reported that there have not been activities, except on some Sundays. Review of the posted Activity Calendar for January 2024 indicated the following activities scheduled for 1/30/24: 10:00 A.M., Chair Zumba 11:00 A.M. Reminiscing 12:00 P.M. Dining Social (lunch) 2:00 P.M. Room Visits 3:00 P.M. Name Tune 4:00 P.M. Meet and Greet During observations on the 1st, 2nd and 3rd floor units on 1/30/24 at the schedule activity times (10:00, 11:00, 2:00, 3:00 and 4:00), there were no activities being held as indicated on the calendar. During an interview on 1/31/24 at approximately 10:30 A.M., the Administrator…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-02 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — patternHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility staff failed to provide a choice of smoking was honored for two Resident's (#15) and (#79), out of a total sample of 40 residents. Findings include: During an interview on 2/1/24 at 11:28 A.M., the Administrator said there was no set policy or alternative plan for smokers at this time and the facility was currently figuring out a final plan. 1.Resident #15 was admitted to the facility in October 2020 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), cardiomyopathy and chronic ischemic heart disease. Review of Resident 15's facility medical record indicated a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 1/15/20, indicated that the Resident scored 15 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), which indicated the Resident was cognitively intact. During an interview on 1/31/24 at 8:03 A.M., Resident 15 said he/she would like to smoke and has been told no the past three days. Resident #15 said he/she normally is allowed to go out twice a day to smoke but has been told he/she is not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to develop and implement care plans for three Residents, (#20, #70 and #255). Specifically: 1. For Resident #20, the facility failed to implement supervision during meals as part of a nutritional care plan 2. For Resident #70, the facility failed to implement a scoop mattress as part of a fall care plan, and 3. For Resident #255, the facility failed to develop a care plan related to suicidal ideation, out of a total of 40 sampled residents. Findings include: 1. Resident #20 was admitted to the facility in March 2016 with diagnoses including transient chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), cerebral ischemic attack, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and adult failure to thrive. Review of Resident #20's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated that he/she had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 5 out of a possible 15, indicating he/she has severe cognitive impairments. On 1/31/24 at 12:43 P.M., 1/31/24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-02 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure four Residents (#404, #68, #255 and #90), out of a total sample of 40 residents, received care and treatment in accordance with professional standards. Specifically, the facility failed 1. for Resident (#404), to take a baseline measurement of a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) on admission and monitor the condition of the insertion site as well as the length of the catheter exiting the body, 2. For Resident #68 the facility failed to follow a physician recommendation for a hand surgeon consult, 3. For Resident #255 the facility failed to review and implement hospice recommendations, and 4. For Resident #90 the facility failed to ensure that a diabetic resident received the correct supplement during a medication pass. Findings include: 1. Resident #404 was admitted to the facility in January 2024 with diagnoses including dependence on dialysis with an indwelling peripherally inserted central catheter, schizophrenia and bipolar…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-02 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — patternEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to: 1. assess and treat one Resident (#68) after a decline in functional status, 2. provide appropriate communication services for one Resident (#255) resulting in agitation and frustration with his/her ongoing inability to communicate with staff, 3. provide assistance with meals for two Residents (#28 and #81), out of a total sample of 40 residents. Findings include: 1. Resident #68 was admitted in October 2022 with diagnoses including dysphagia and reduced mobility. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated that Resident #68 scored a 14 out of 15 on the Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS), indicating intact cognition. Further review indicated that Resident #68 is totally dependent for bathing, transfers, personal hygiene, and upper and lower body dressing. During an interview on 1/30/24 at 11:08 A.M., Resident #68 said that he/she never gets rehab services and would like rehab. Review of the clinical record indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-02 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to 1. change oxygen tubing according to a physician's order for three Residents (#31, #20 and #48), and 2. failed to change an oxygen concentrator filter for one Resident (#48), out of a total sample of 40 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Oxygen Administration, dated 02/2023, indicated the following: Preparation - Verify that there is a physician's order in place. Review the physician's orders or facility protocol for oxygen administration. 1a. Resident #31 was admitted in October 2022 with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure and emphysema. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated that Resident #31 scored a 14 out of a possible 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental status (BIMS), indicating intact cognition. Review of the MDS also indicates that Resident #31 requires oxygen therapy. Review of the physician's orders indicated the following order: -Change nebulizer and O2 tubing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-02 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, facility assessment review, and in-service documentation review, the facility failed to ensure that the nursing staff received the appropriate competencies and skill sets necessary for the care and treatment of residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure annual competencies were completed and documented for six out of six certified nursing assistants (CNAs), and six out of six licensed nurses whose education records were reviewed. Findings include: According to the Board of Registration in Nursing, 244 CMR 9.00 &10.00: Standards of Conduct, Definitions and Severability; a competency is defined as the application of knowledge and the use of affective, cognitive, and psychomotor skills required for the role of a nurse licensed by the Board of Nursing and for the delivery of safe nursing care in accordance with accepted standards of practice. Competency is a measurable pattern of knowledge, skills, abilities, behaviors, and other characteristics that an individual needs to perform…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-02 · tag F0730 — patternObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete annual Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) performance reviews for six of six sampled Certified Nurses Assistants (CNAs). Findings include: During the review of six CNA employee records on 2/1/24 at 3:25 P.M. and 2/2/24 at 9:00 A.M., the Surveyor noted that six of six sampled CNAs did not receive annual performance reviews. During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) and the Administrator on 2/2/24 at 11:45 A.M., the above concerns were reviewed. The Administrator said Corporate is responsible for annual performance reviews and is unsure who is currently completing them. The Director of Nursing said she would check with Corporate regarding the annual performance reviews.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-02 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure it provided a physician ordered medication for one Resident (#64) out of a total sample of 40 residents. Specifically, on 1/31/24 Nurse #1 did not have Resident #64's physician ordered Trazadone (medication used to treat depression) and Nurse #1 failed to obtain the medication from the emergency medication supply. Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled 'Administering Medications', dated February 2020, indicated the following and is not limited to: *Medications are administered in a safe and timely manner and as prescribed. Resident #64 was admitted to the facility in October 2022 with diagnoses including anxiety and depression. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated Resident #60 has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of possible 15 indicating he/she was cognitively intact. The MDS further indicated that he/she had anxiety and depression. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-02 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record reviews, policy reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure it was free from a medication error rate of greater than 5 percent. Three out of four nurses observed made four errors in 38 opportunities on two of three units resulting in a medication error rate of 10.53%. These errors impacted three Residents (#90, #27 and #64), out of five residents observed. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled 'Administering Medications', revised 2/2020, indicated the following but not limited to: *Medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. 1.During a medication pass on 1/30/24 at 10:07 A.M., the surveyor observed Nurse #6 prepare and administer the following medication to Resident #90: -metformin 500mg one tablet by mouth Review of current physician's orders indicated the following: -Metformin HCL oral tablet 500 mg (milligram) give two tablets by mouth one tome a day related to diabetes mellitus due to underlying condition with hyperglycemia. During an interview on 1/30/24 at 2:38 P.M., Nurse #6 said he…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-02 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that a resident was free from significant medication error. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure blood pressure increasing medication was held per physician orders parameters for one Resident (#64) out of a total sample of 40 residents. Findings include: Review of facility policy titled 'Administering Medications' last revised February 2020, indicated the following but not limited to: *Medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. *Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time frame. Resident #64 was admitted to the facility in October 2022 with diagnoses including history of falling and anemia. Review of Resident #64 medical record active physician's orders indicated the following: *Midodrine HCL tablet 10 mg (milligrams) give 10 mg by mouth two times a day for low blood pressure hold if systolic blood pressure greater than 110. On 1/31/24 at 9:11 A.M., the surveyor observed a medication pass with Nurse #8, Nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-02 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, policy review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure medications with short expiration dates were dated when opened, failed to ensure medication carts were securely locked when unattended and medications were securely locked. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled 'Storage of Medication' last revised in August 2020, indicated the following but not limited to: *Medications and biologicals are stored safely securely and properly, following manufacturer's recommendations or those of the supplier. The medication supply is accessible only to licensed nursing personnel, pharmacy personnel, or staff members lawfully authorized to administer medications. *Medication storage areas are kept clean, well lit and free of clutter and extreme temperatures and humidity. *When the original seal of a manufacturer's container or vial is initially broken, the container or vial will be dated. *The nurse shall place a 'date opened' sticker on the medication and record the date opened and the new date of expiration. The expiration date of the vial or container…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-02 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — patternConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and review of the facility assessment, the facility failed to accurately evaluate their resident population and identify the resources needed to provide the necessary care and services of the resident population related to activities programming. Findings include: During observations throughout the survey from 1/30/24 through 2/2/24 the surveyors identified concerns related to Activity Programming. Review of the Facility assessment dated [DATE] indicated: Provide Person-Centered Directed care Psycho/Social/Spiritual support: Note; some of these preferences are not able to be met at this time due to existing Covid-19 protocols relating to cohorting, limited visitation, communal activities, communal dining, etc. Activities are scheduled for residents on a one-to-one basis in resident rooms, offering puzzles, games, nail cleaning and conversation. Residents are also encouraged in virtual visitation with families and friends. During an interview on 2/2/24 at 11:16 A.M., the Administrator said…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-02 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to accurately document in the medical record for three Residents (#404, #97 and #91) out of a total sample of 40 residents. Specifically for 1. For Resident #404 the doctor's orders indicated that dialysis was on hold when the Resident was receiving dialysis. 2. For Resident #97 nursing was documenting the Resident was receiving Glucerna when it was not available. 3. For Resident #91 nursing documented the Resident was wearing booties when they were not available. Findings include: The facility failed to provide a policy for accurate documentation in the clinical record that was requested by the surveyors. 1. Resident #404 was admitted to the facility in January 2024 with diagnoses including dependence on dialysis with an indwelling peripherally inserted central catheter, schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Review of the doctor's orders dated 1/24/24, indicated a doctor's order for Dialysis in the morning every Mon, Wed, Fri for Hemo Dialysis, status on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed infection control standards on one of three nursing units. Specifically: 1. The facility failed to ensure staff followed isolation precautions while providing care and housekeeping services during a Covid-19 outbreak. Additionally, 2. the facility failed to ensure that professional standards of practice were upheld during a medication pass to prevent the spread of infection. Findings include: Upon entrance to the facility on 1/30/24, the surveyors were notified that there was a Covid-19 outbreak on the second floor unit. A total of 20 out of 40 residents on the unit had tested positive for Covid-19. On 1/31/24, an additional three residents tested positive. Review of the facility's Infection Prevention for Covid-19 dated as revised May 2020, indicated: Process: To mitigate risk for the spread of Covid-19 to residents and staff. 1. The facility will follow transmission based policies and procedures and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid services guidance for residents suspected or confirmed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-02 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — patternEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, policy review, and interview the facility failed to ensure that at least 12 hours of in-service training was completed for six of six Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs). Findings include: Review of the policy titled, In-service Training Program, Nurse Assistance, last revised 10/2019 indicated the following: Policy statement: *Nurse Assistance personnel shall participate in regular in-service training classes. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: *3. Annual in-services: a. Ensure the continuing competence of nurse assistants. b. Be no less than 12 hours per employment year. During the review of employee education files on 2/2/24 at 9:00 A.M., the Surveyor noted six out of six Certified Nursing Aides did not receive 12 hours of required in-service education within 12 months. During an interview on 2/2/24 at 11:45 A.M., the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) said he assumed all staff education when he started in December 2023, he is aware staff education is not up to date. The ADON said it would be the expectation that mandatory education would be completed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-02 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure a dignified existence for four Residents (#30, #49, #74 and #35) out of a total sample of 40 residents. Specifically for 1. Residents #30 and #49 the facility failed to assist with the removal of unwanted chin hair, 2. For Resident #74 the facility removed the Resident's socks in the dining room to cut his/her toenails and 3. For Resident # 35 the facility failed to provide clean sheets. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Resident Rights, dated revised 11/2017 indicated that employees shall treat residents with kindness, respect and dignity. Review of the facility policy titled Activities of Daily Living (ADL's), Supporting, dated revised 9/2019 indicated that residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary for activities of daily living. 1a). Resident #30 was admitted to the facility in December 2012 with diagnoses including dementia, depression…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-02 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to 1. complete admission consents and 2. invoke the health care proxy for 1 Resident (#255) out of a total sample of 40 residents. Findings include: Resident #255 was admitted in December 2023 with diagnoses including depression. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated that Resident #255 was moderately impaired. Review of the MDS indicated that Resident #255 needs and wants an interpreter to communicate with staff or a doctor. 1. Review of the clinical record indicated the following consents were not completed for Resident #255: - Consent to admission and treatment - Side Rail Consent form - Immunization consent - Consent for ancillary services - Consent for supportive care for routine diagnosis and treatment Resident #255 had side rails on his/her bed despite the consent not being signed. 2. Review of the Massachusetts Medical Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (MOLST) indicated that Resident #255's daughter, as the Resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-02 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (#2C) had a physician order in place and was assessed for the ability to self-administer medications independently, out of a total sample of 32 Residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled 'Safety and Supervision of Residents', dated April 2018, indicated the following: *Residents have the right to self-administer medications if the interdisciplinary team has determined that it is clinically appropriate and safe for the resident to do so. *If the team determines that a resident cannot safely self-administer medications, the nursing staff will administer the resident's medication. Resident #2C was admitted to the facility in February 2024 with diagnoses including bilateral age-related nuclear cataract and glaucoma. On 3/14/24 at 8:45 A.M., the surveyor and Nurse #5 were in Resident #2C's room for medication administration. Resident #2C said he/she had his/her eye drops in the drawer. Nurse #5 asked the Resident to show him the eye drops. Resident #2C gave Nurse #5 two…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-02 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to 1. Ensure resident wheelchairs were maintained in a safe, clean condition on two out of three units observed and specifically for two Residents (#30 and #63) out of a total of 40 residents. 2. Ensure residents were provided with a homelike dining experience. Findings include: 1. On 2/1/24, at 1:45 P.M., the surveyor observed the following: A. On the first floor unit, one out of six wheelchairs had broken/cracked wheelchair arms. B. On the second floor unit, two out of four wheelchairs had broken/cracked wheelchair arms. C. On the third floor unit, five out of ten wheelchairs had broken/cracked wheelchair arms. 2a. Resident #30 was admitted to the facility in December 2012 with diagnoses including dementia, depression and psychotic disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], indicated that Resident #30 requires assistance from staff to complete Activities of Daily Living (ADL's). Further review indicated that Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-02 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to file a grievance for one Resident (#72) out of a total sample of 40 residents. Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled Grievances, dated as revised 12/18, indicated the following: Policy: The facility will support each resident's right to voice grievances and to ensure that after a grievance has been received, the Grievance Official (Administrator or designee) will collaboratively work with team members to resolve the issue and provide written grievance decisions to the resident and or resident's family. Guideline: The Administrator is identified as the Grievance Official responsible for oversight of the grievance process in the facility. This includes responsibility for reviewing and tracking grievances, leading any investigations, ensuring that grievances and/or complaints are confirmed or not confirmed, and that a written grievance decision has been provided to the person filing the grievance. Procedure: 2. Grievances and complaints…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-02 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure podiatry services were offered and toenails were kept trimmed and free of infection for 1 Resident (#74) out of a total sample of 40 residents. Findings include: Resident #74 was admitted to the facility in November 2019 with diagnoses including schizophrenia, depression and psychotic disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], indicated Resident #74 was unable to complete the Brief Interview for Mental Status exam and is severely cognitively impaired. Review of the care plan for activities of daily living (ADL) dated as initiated 12/13/2019, indicated that Resident #74 has an ADL deficit and needs assistance with all aspects of care. During an interview on 1/30/24 at 2:29 P.M., Resident #74 asked the surveyor if someone could cut his/her toe nails. Resident #74 said that her/his toes hurt. The surveyor then informed nursing about Resident #74's request to have his/her toe nails cut. On 1/30/24, at 2:30 P.M.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-02 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to complete a Level I Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR- screen to determine if a resident had an intellectual or developmental disability and/or serious mental illness and needed further evaluation) for two Residents (#44 and #404), out of a total sample of 40 residents. Findings include: 1. For Resident #44 the facility failed to complete a level 1 preadmission screening and Resident Review. Resident #44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. Review of Resident #44's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated the Resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 out of a possible 15 indicating he/she was moderately cognitively impaired. Review of Resident #44's medical record failed to indicate a Level 1 Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) had been completed prior to admission to the facility. During an interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-02 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record record review and interview the facility failed to create a baseline plan of care within the required 48 hours of admission for one Resident (#404) out of a total sample of 40 residents. Findings include: The facility failed to provide a policy for the development of a baseline care plan. Resident #404 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including dependence on dialysis with an indwelling central line catheter, schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Review of the medical record on 1/31/24, failed to indicate a baseline care plan. During an interview on 1/31/24, at 9:00 A.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) said that a baseline care plan should be developed immediately but at a minimum of 72 hours after admission. During an interview on 1/31/24, at 9:01 A.M., Nurse #5 said that a care plan is supposed to be developed on admission. Nurse #5 said that nurses look to the care plan for information on what the residents need. Nurse #5 then said it was really important because a resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to update the falls care plan with appropriate interventions to prevent further falls for one Resident (#97) out of a total of 40 sampled Residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Assessing Falls and Their Causes, dated January 2018, indicated: *When a resident falls, the following documentation should be recorded in the following should be recorded in the resident's record: Completion of a falls risk assessment. Appropriate interventions taken to prevent future falls. Resident #97 was admitted to the facility in September 2023 with diagnoses including traumatic brain injury, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and dementia. Review of Resident #97's Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] indicated he/she is moderately cognitively impaired and requires assistance with bathing and dressing. Review of Resident #97's fall risk assessment dated [DATE], indicated he/she was at moderate risk for falls. Review of Resident #97's fall…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-02 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to identify and address a significant weight loss timely and implement interventions addressing his/her weight loss for one Resident (#97), out of a total sample of 40 residents, resulting in an 11.7% loss of his/her total body weight in three months. Findings include: Review of the facility's Weight Measurement Policy, dated as revised 4/4/2019, indicated: *Weights will be obtained weekly X 4 after admission. Subsequent weights will be monthly, unless physicians orders or the resident's condition [NAME] more frequent as determined by the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT). *All residents with significant weight changes will have verification of weight measurement for accuracy and documentation purposes. If verification of weight indicates significant weight change (suggested parameters for evaluating significance of unplanned and undesired weight loss are: 5% in 30 days, 7.5% in 90 days and 10% in 180 days) the resident and/or representative and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-02 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff provided appropriate care and services for one Resident (#42) with a Gastrostomy tube (G-tube: a tube that is placed directly into the stomach through an abdominal incision for administration of nutrition, fluids, and medications), out of 40 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: a. ensure staff labeled the enteral formula container and water flush bag with the Resident's name, date and time hung, the administration rate, duration, and initials of the staff member hanging them. b. ensure staff programmed the Resident's enteral feeding pump (device used to deliver nutrition to patients who cannot consume food and drink by swallowing) properly with the ordered frequency of feeding (used to maintain patency and provide hydration) causing the Resident to not receive the total volume ordered of 1680 milliliters (ml) of enteral feed in a 16- hour period (2 pm-6am) on 2/1/24. Findings include: Review of facility policy titled 'Enteral Nutrition' Last revised 2018, indicated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-02 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to provide care and services consistent with professional standards for one Resident (#404) who required renal dialysis (a life sustaining treatment that helps your body remove extra fluid and waste products from your blood when the kidneys are not able to) out of a total sample of 40 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that clamps and pressure dressings were kept with the Resident (#404) for emergency related to a tunneled hemodialysis catheter (a plastic tube used for exchanging blood between a patient and a hemodialysis machine). Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled 'End-Stage Renal Disease, Care of a Resident with (sic)' last revised July 2023, indicated the following but not limited to: Policy: The facility assures that each resident receives care and services for the provision of hemodialysis and/or peritoneal dialysis consistent with professional standards of practice. Resident #404 was admitted to the facility in January 2024 with diagnoses including end stage renal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-02 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a plan of care was developed for Trauma-Informed Care for one Resident (#91), who was admitted with the diagnosis of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), out of a total sample of 40 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled 'Trauma Informed Care' revised October 2019, indicated the following but not limited to: *To guide staff in appropriate and compassionate care specific to individuals who have experienced trauma. *Include trauma-informed care as part of the QAPI (quality assurance performance improvement) plan, so that needs and problems areas are identified and addressed, Resident #91 was admitted to the facility in September 2023 with diagnoses including post-traumatic stress disorder. Review of Resident #91's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated the Resident scored a 15 out of possible 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating Resident #91 was cognitively intact. The MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-02 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide behavioral health services for 1 Resident (#255) out of a total sample of 40 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Behavioral Health Services, dated 09/2019, indicated the following: -Behavioral health services are provided to residents as needed as part of the interdisciplinary, person-centered approach to care. -Residents who exhibit signs of emotional/psychosocial distress receive services and support that address their individual needs and goals for care. -Staff must promote dignity, autonomy, privacy, socialization and safety as appropriate for each resident and are trained in ways to support residents in distress. Resident #255 was admitted in December 2023 with diagnoses including depression. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated that Resident #255 had moderately impaired cognition. the MDS did not contain a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score (cognitive assessment). Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-02 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolatedProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide medically related social services to attain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being, for one Resident (#255) specifically, providing or arranging for needed mental and psychosocial counseling services after verbalizing suicidal ideation Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Behavioral Health Services, dated 09/2019, indicated the following: -Behavioral health services are provided to residents as needed as part of the interdisciplinary, person-centered approach to care. -Residents who exhibit signs of emotional/psychosocial distress receive services and support that address their individual needs and goals for care. -Staff must promote dignity, autonomy, privacy, socialization and safety as appropriate for each resident and are trained in ways to support residents in distress. 1. Resident #255 was admitted in December 2023 with diagnoses including depression. Review of the Minimum…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-02 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide dental services to replace missing dentures for 1 Resident (#78) out of a total sample of 40 residents. Findings include: The facility failed to provide the surveyors of a policy for the provision of routine/emergent dental services. Resident #78 was admitted in August 2022 with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes and hypertension. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated that Resident #78 scored a 15 out of a possible 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), indicating intact cognition. Review of the MDS indicated that Resident #78 requires partial to moderate assistance with meals. Review of the progress note, dated 9/28/23, indicated that Resident #78 reported to the Dietitian that he/she lost his/her lower denture making chewing difficult. Review of the physician's orders indicate that Resident #78's diet was downgraded on 9/28/23 to mechanical soft texture with thin liquids. Review of the clinical record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and policy review the facility failed to maintain proper sanitation practices in the kitchen, specifically related to glove use when serving the tray line. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Hand washing, Bare Hand Contact, and Glove use, dated 06/2018, indicated the following: Single use disposable gloves -Only use gloves approved for food service. -Glove use in itself does not guarantee food safety. Gloves are a food contact surface; they are just like hands and cause and spread pathogens if not used properly. -Disposable gloves are task specific and should be changed when switching to a new task. During an observation on 2/2/24 at 7:52 A.M. to 8:10 A.M., the cook serving the line was wearing single use gloves and was serving the tray line. The breakfast line included pancakes, muffins, and toast, which all were served without the use of utensils. During the serving line, the cook would grab the handle of one serving utensil and then, with the same potentially contaminated single use gloves, would serve toast with the same gloved hands. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-02 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolatedAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews the facility failed to ensure it was administered in a manner that enabled the facility to use its resources effectively to attain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident and provide a homelike environment. Specifically, the facility administration failed to ensure the governance and leadership members sustained a sufficient activities program and a sufficient Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) program during transitions in staffing and the serving of meals in a homelike manner. Findings include: During the recertification survey conducted on 1/30/24, through 2/2/24, the survey team observed concerns with a lack of activities programming for all residents. During the recertification survey conducted on 1/30/24, through 2/2/24, the surveyors identified the building did not have a home-like environment on 3 of 3 nursing units evidenced by, meals served on trays in an institutional manner. During an interview on 2/1/24, at 2:10 P.M. with the Director of Nursing and the Administrator, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-02 · tag F0837 — isolatedEstablish a governing body that is legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies for managing and operating the facility and appoints a properly licensed administrator responsible for managing the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, including review of the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement program (QAPI) facility policy, the facility failed to ensure that the governing body provided oversight and accountability for: 1. The maintenance of an effective QAPI program. 2. The provision of a sufficient activity program. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) revised June 2019 indicated the following: The [NAME] President Of Operations will periodically review the QAPI process. The facility will identify areas of improvement and rank them by factors such as prevalence, risk, cost, relevance, responsiveness, feasibility and continuity. From this we will develop our Performance Improvement Projects (PIP). PIP projects are developed based on a prioritizing process . Further review indicated that the facility will use a Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) process and Root Cause Analysis (RCA) to identify improvement opportunities and to understand how to improve them. 1. Review of the QAPI meeting minutes for 2023…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-02 · tag F0841 — isolatedDesignate a physician to serve as medical director responsible for implementation of resident care policies and coordination of medical care in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure that the medical director attended the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) meetings at least quarterly. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) dated revised June 2019 indicated the following: The facility will form a QAPI steering committee designed to meet monthly. The Steering Committee must include the Medical Director (attendance required quarterly). Review of the QAPI meeting minutes sign in logs for 2023 indicated that the medical director attended one QAPI meeting (July 2023) for the year 2023. During an interview on 2/1/24, at 2:10 P.M., the Administrator said that the medical director is supposed to attend the QAPI meetings at least quarterly. The Administrator was unable to say why the medical director had not attended three of the four quarterly meetings in 2023.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-02 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — isolatedHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and review of the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) meeting minutes for 2023, the facility staff failed to ensure an effective QAPI plan was in place. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) revised June 2019 indicated the following: We will identify areas of improvement and rank them by factors such as prevalence, risk, cost, relevance, responsiveness, feasibility and continuity. From this we will develop our Performance Improvement Projects (PIP). PIP projects are developed based on a prioritizing process . Further review indicated that the facility will use a Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) process and Root Cause Analysis (RCA) to identify improvement opportunities and to understand how to improve them. Review of all the 12 months of meeting minutes for 2023 failed to indicate that there were benchmarks developed, failed to indicate a prioritizing process was implemented, failed to indicate that a root cause analysis was completed for identified problems and failed to indicate the tracking…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-02 · tag F0868 — isolatedHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure that the Medical Director or an appropriate designee attended Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Plan (QAPI) Committee meetings at least quarterly. Findings include: Review of the Facility policy titled Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) dated revised June 2019 indicated that the QAPI steering committee must include the medical director (attendance required quarterly). Review of the Facility documents titled Quality Assurance Performance Improvement Committee Attendees indicated that three of the last four quarters the Medical Director or an appropriate designee did not attend the meeting. During an interview on 2/1/24, at 2:10 P.M., the Administrator said that the medical director is supposed to attend the QAPI meetings at least quarterly. The Administrator was unable to say why the medical director had not attended three of the four quarterly meetings in 2023.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-02 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to offer and provide influenza immunization for one Resident (#64) out of five residents reviewed. Findings include: Resident #64 was admitted to the facility in October 2022. Review of Resident #64's clinical record, and the facility's immunization logs failed to indicate he/she had been offered or received the influenza vaccine. During an interview on 2/2/24 at 10:40 A.M., the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) provided the surveyor with a signed consent form for influenza immunization which was dated for 2022. The ADON said that he was unable to locate evidence Resident #64 had received or been offered the influenza vaccine.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-02 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to offer and provide Covid-19 immunization for one Resident (#64) out of five residents reviewed. Findings include: Resident #64 was admitted to the facility in October 2022. Review of Resident #64's clinical record, and the facility's immunization logs failed to indicate he/she had been offered or received the Covid-19 vaccine. During an interview on 2/2/24 at 10:40 A.M., the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) provided the surveyor with a signed consent form for Covid-19 immunization which was dated for 2022. The ADON said that he was unable to locate evidence Resident #64 had received or been offered the Covid-19 vaccine.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-20 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of four sampled residents (Resident #1) the Facility failed to ensure they maintained a complete and accurate medical records when Certified Nurse Aide Activity of Daily Living (ADL) Flow Sheet documentation was not consistently completed for Resident #1 during the Months of July 2023, August 2023, and September 2023. Findings Include: Review of the Facility Policy titled Charting and Documentation, dated as last revised 09/2022, indicated services provided to the resident, progress toward the care plan goals, or changes in the resident's medical, physical, functional, or psychosocial condition, shall be documented in the resident's medical record. Resident #1 was admitted to the Facility in October 2022, diagnoses included history of falls, major depressive disorder, hypertension, dementia, encephalopathy, cirrhosis of the liver, and fractures of the left and right lower extremities. Review of Resident #1's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE],…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0732 — patternPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to post nursing staff data daily, at the start of each shift, as required. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure they consistently posted the staffing as required. Findings include: On 12/15/25 at 6:42 A.M., the surveyors observed the daily staffing posted as Friday 12/12/25 at 1:55 P.M., there were no additional staffing sheets under this one sheet. During an interview on 12/16/25 at 1:29 P.M., the Scheduler said that after last recertification survey she is supposed to update that daily staffing sheets Monday through Friday and post the sheets at the entrance of the facility. She said that during the weekends it is the responsibility of the person in charge to print the staffing sheets, and she does not print them on Friday because she does not know the facility census. The Scheduler said that she noticed on 12/15/25 the staffing sheet was still dated 12/12/25. During an interview on 12/16/25 at 2:29 P.M., the Administrator said that he is aware of the requirement to post the daily staffing sheets. The Administrator…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0732 — patternPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to post nursing staff data daily, at the start of each shift, as required. Findings include: On 1/6/25 at 6:47 A.M., and at 5:00 P.M., and on 1/7/25 at 6:40 A.M., the surveyor observed the daily staffing posted at the front of the facility dated Wednesday December 25, 2024. On 1/8/25 at 11:47 A.M. and at 4:37 P.M., the surveyor observed the daily staffing posted at the front of the facility dated Tuesday January 7, 2025. On 1/9/25 at 6:52 A.M., the surveyor observed the daily staffing posted at the front of the facility dated Tuesday January 7, 2025. During an interview on 1/9/25 at 11:23 A.M., the Scheduling Coordinator said she is responsible for printing the staff data daily to the reception printer. The Scheduling Coordinator said the Administrator, or the Receptionist will post the staff data. During an interview on 1/9/25 at 12:32 P.M., the Administrator said that nurse staffing should be posted as required.
- No harm found · B2024-02-02 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide a copy of the transfer/discharge notice upon transfer to the hospital for four Residents (#3, #16, #42 and #48) out of a total of 40 sampled Residents. Findings include: Review of facility policy titled 'Bed Holds/Return' last revised May 2018, indicated the following but not limited to: *Prior to transfers and therapeutic leaves, residents or resident representatives will be informed in writing of the bed-hold and return policy. *Prior to a transfer, written information will be given to the residents and/or the resident representatives that explain in details: -The rights and limitations of the resident regarding bed-holds. -The details of the transfer (per the Notice of Transfer) 1. Resident #3 was admitted to the facility in July 2018 with diagnoses including bipolar disorder, borderline personality disorder and post traumatic stress disorder. Review of Resident #3's Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated Resident #3 is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2024-02-02 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide a copy of the bed hold notice upon transfer to the hospital for four Residents (#3, #16, #42, and #48) out of a total of 40 sampled Residents. Findings include: Review of facility policy titled 'Bed Holds/Return' last revised May 2018, indicated the following but not limited to: *Prior to transfers and therapeutic leaves, residents or resident representatives will be informed in writing of the bed-hold and return policy. *Prior to a transfer, written information will be given to the residents and/or the resident representatives that explain in details: -The rights and limitations of the resident regarding bed-holds. -The details of the transfer (per the Notice of Transfer) 1. Resident #3 was admitted to the facility in July 2018 with diagnoses including bipolar disorder, borderline personality disorder and post traumatic stress disorder. Review of Resident #3's Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated Resident #3 is moderately…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$184,166 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $184,166 — penalty dated 2024-02-02
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to NEXT STEP HEALTHCARE — 14 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 1.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 1.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 2.2 | +1.8 vs chain |
The other 13 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.7★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| DELL'ANNO, DAMIAN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 09/01/2017 |
| STEPHAN, WILLIAM | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 09/01/2017 |
| NEXT STEP HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/20/2025 |
| LIKHI, RISHI | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/16/2024 |
| WADDELL, ROBERT | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/15/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $584K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Massachusetts Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 225324. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-18, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.