No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Belpre Landing Nursing And Rehabilitation

1915 Hill Street, Belpre, OH 45714 · For profit - Corporation · 62 certified beds · (740) 350-9095 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (740) 350-9095 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0602) — cited Nov 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0740, F0758)1 actual-harm citation
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited Nov 2025
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (47) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
807 Farson St Ste 203 · (740) 423-9640 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
812 Farson St · (740) 780-0204 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1820 Washington Blvd · (740) 423-5082 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1600 Washington Blvd · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased7.7%5.3%15.4%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight10.1%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.4%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms86.2%30.1%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.1%3.2%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened3.6%6.1%16.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication28.8%25.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers13.2%3.4%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control22.8%21.4%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table7.3%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.6%75.6%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission30.6%24.9%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit18.0%12.9%12.0%worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 323 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

54.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
48.9%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.65U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.38hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.21hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 48.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 133 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.65 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 90% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF54.0%CMS range 47.6–58.151.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.2%CMS range 8.7–13.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge48.9%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge35.3%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge30.1%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.6%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.5%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization5.2%CMS range 3.6–8.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.021.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.60
RN hours/ resident / day
1.15
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.91
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.66
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.38
RN hoursweekends
47.3%
Total nursing turnover
42.9%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 62 beds and averages 48.8 residents a day — about 79% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.66 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.60 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.91 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.37 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.78 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.68 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 47% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

14
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-01-08)
11
at the previous standard inspection (2024-01-18)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

47 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 36 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, hospital record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #2, with a known history of hypothermia, was comprehensively monitored for a change in condition to ensure timely notification to the resident's medical provider to prevent a delay in treatment. This affected one resident (#2) of three sampled residents reviewed for quality of care. The facility census was 49.Actual Harm occurred on 01/17/26 when Resident #2 was noted to exhibit decreased consciousness and was transported to the hospital for evaluation where she was admitted with hypothermia (body temperature of 91 degrees F) and multiple infections requiring treatment in the intensive care unit and antibiotic therapy. Resident #2, who was dependent on a ventilator for breathing, dependent on staff for care, had diagnosis of multiple sclerosis and had been re-admitted to the facility (on 12/24/25) from the hospital after being treated for hypothermia (with a temperature of 93 degrees Fahrenheit (F))…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-01-30 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the facility assessment and interview, the facility failed to ensure the facility assessment was completed accurately. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The facility census was 49. Findings include:Review of the facility assessment dated [DATE] revealed the facility treats a wide range of patients transitioning from hospital to home. Prior to the admission of any resident, the Director of Nursing (DON) along with the interdisciplinary team would assess the physical and psychosocial needs to determine if placement is appropriate. Prior to a new admission arriving at the facility, all care related items not currently in the facility are ordered. Special treatments that could be completed in the facility included, but were not limited to, respiratory treatments. Respiratory treatments that could be completed in the building included oxygen therapy (15), suctioning (5), tracheostomy care (0), and ventilator or respirator care (2). Further review of the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure respiratory care was completed as ordered. This affected two residents (#1 and #2) of two residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility census was 49. Findings include: 1.Record review revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including sepsis, pneumonia, and acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia. Review of a care plan dated 01/08/26 revealed Resident #1 had an alteration in respiratory function related to respiratory failure with hypoxia and hypercapnia, pneumonia, dependence on a respiratory and tracheostomy. Goals included to be free of respiratory distress through the review date, show adequate oxygen perfusion through review date, and lungs will be clear to auscultation and spO2 will be above 90% through the review date. Interventions included but were not limited to assess lung sounds per orders and nursing judgment, report abnormal breath sounds to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of staff schedules, review of the National Library of Medicine literature, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure sufficient registered nurses or respiratory therapists were available at the facility to care for residents with ventilators. This affected two (#1 and #2) of two residents with ventilators. The facility census was 49. Findings include:1.Record review revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including sepsis, pneumonia, and acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia. Review of an order dated 01/08/26 revealed Resident #1 required a ventilator check every four hours and as needed. Review of a care plan dated 01/08/26 revealed resident #1 had an alteration in respiratory function related to respiratory failure with hypoxia and hypercapnia, pneumonia, dependence on a respiratory and tracheostomy. Goals included to be free of respiratory distress through the review date, show adequate oxygen perfusion through review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-24 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of facility investigations, observations, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents' controlled narcotic medications were not misappropriated. This affected two (#8 and #50) of three residents reviewed for misappropriation of medications. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #8's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included unspecified dementia, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), amputation of the left leg below the knee, and osteoarthritis. Review of Resident #8's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident did not have any communication issues and her cognition was moderately impaired. She was coded on the MDS assessment as having had pain in the past five days she rated as a 4 on a 1-10 scale. She received both scheduled and prn pain medication for her pain. The medication section of the MDS assessment (Section N) did not indicate that she had received opioid…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of facility investigations, observations, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure all allegations/ suspicions of misappropriation of resident property was reported to the State Survey Agency as required. This affected two (#8 and #50) of three residents reviewed for misappropriation of medications. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #8's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included unspecified dementia, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), amputation of the left leg below the knee, and osteoarthritis. Review of Resident #8's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident did not have any communication issues and her cognition was moderately impaired. She was coded on the MDS assessment as having had pain in the past five days she rated as a 4 on a 1-10 scale. She received both scheduled and prn pain medication for her pain. The medication section of the MDS assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-24 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of a facility investigation pertaining to an alleged/ suspected tampering of controlled narcotic medications, review of shift to shift controlled medication reconciliation sheets, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure proper pharmacy procedures were followed in regards to performing an appropriate reconciliation of all controlled medications each time keys to medication administration carts providing access to those controlled medications were exchanged between nurses. This affected two (#8 and #50) of three residents reviewed for the handling of controlled narcotic medications. Findings include: Review of a facility investigation file pertaining to the suspected tampering of Resident #8 and Resident #50's liquid Morphine Sulfate revealed an allegation of potential tampering of the controlled medication was reported to the facility's Director of Nursing (DON) on 11/14/25. As part of the facility's investigation, personal witness statements and/ or phone interviews were conducted with the facility's nurses regarding Resident #8's Morphine…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-01-08 · tag F0868 — widespread
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, policy review and interviews, the facility failed to meet at least quarterly to coordinate and evaluate activities under the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program. This had the potential to affect all 52 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility QAPI program revealed no documented evidence, such as meeting minutes or sign-in sheets, that quarterly Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) committee meetings were held. In an interview on 01/08/25 at 10:16 A.M. Administrator #582 verified the facility had no documented evidence, such as meeting minutes or sign-in sheets, that quarterly QAA committee meetings were held. She stated that they worked on quality improvement at least weekly but did not have a formal meeting with minutes to prove that they had done so. Review of the undated policy titled Quality Assurance/Performance improvement (QAPI) revealed the Medical Director has the responsibility to attend the QAPI committee meetings at least quarterly. Further review revealed the committee should analyze…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-08 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident interview, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a multi-disciplinary approach was taken and resident's and/or their representatives were included in the development of their care plans. This affected four (Resident #6, #19, #148, and #149) of four residents reviewed for care planning. The facility census was 52. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #149's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including an encounter for other orthopedic aftercare, acute post-procedural pain, abnormalities of gait and mobility, need for assistance with personal care, adult-onset diabetes mellitus, hypertension, obstructive sleep apnea, anxiety disorder, fibromyalgia, and low back pain. Review of Resident #149's admission Record (face sheet) revealed she was her own responsible party. She had a friend listed as her first emergency contact. Review of Resident #149's multi-disciplinary care conference form revealed a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-08 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed accurately reflect Resident #14's significant change, including hospice, in the comprehensive significant change in condition assessment. This affected one resident, (Resident #14) of one resident reviewed for Hospice care. The facility census was 52. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #14 revealed an admission date of 02/26/23 with diagnoses including chronic kidney disease stage three, cerebral infarction, chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder, atherosclerotic heart disease, cardiomegaly, atrial fibrillation, dementia and peripheral venous insufficiency. Review of physician orders revealed an order dated 12/12/24 to admit Resident #14 to Buckeye Hospice care on 12/11/24. Review of the significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment opened 12/11/24 and signed on 12/16/24 revealed Resident #14 was cognitively intact. Resident #14 had a decline in bed mobility and eating assistance. The assessment did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-08 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to complete a new Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) assessment for Resident #6 with a new diagnosis. The facility also failed to ensure the admission PASARR for Resident #37 was accurate. This affected two residents (#6 and #37) of three residents reviewed for PASARR completion. The facility census was 52. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #6 revealed an admission date of 11/01/23 with diagnoses including traumatic brain injury, schizoaffective disorder and dissociative conversion disorder. Review of the plan of care initiated on 12/12/23 revealed Resident #6 had a behavior problem related to belief in delusions that staff was abusive towards the resident, visual and auditory hallucinations and calling 911 (emergency). The goal stated Resident #6 would be free from behaviors by the review date of 02/11/25. The interventions included to administer medications as ordered,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 36 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-08 · tag F0646 — isolated
    Notify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to notify the mental health authority by completing a resident Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR)Level II assessment for Resident #6 with a new diagnosis. This affected one resident (#6) of three residents reviewed for PASARR. The facility census was 52. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #6 revealed an admission date of 11/01/23 with diagnoses including traumatic brain injury, schizoaffective disorder and dissociative conversion disorder. Review of the plan of care initiated on 12/12/23 revealed Resident #6 had a behavior problem related to belief in delusions that staff was abusive towards the resident, visual and auditory hallucinations and calling 911 (emergency). The goal stated Resident #6 would be free from behaviors by the review date of 02/11/25. The interventions included to administer medications as ordered, monitor for effectiveness of medication and potential side effects, intervene and redirect the resident as needed, monitor and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-08 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed ensure Residents #4, #19, and #36 or their representatives were provided with a copy of their baseline care plan. This affected three residents (#4, #19, #36) of three residents reviewed for baseline care plans. The facility census was 52. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #4 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including venous insufficiency, hypertension, and gastro-esophageal reflux disease. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #4's cognition remained intact, and she had no behaviors. Review of the medical record revealed no documented evidence of a new admission care conference being completed within 48 hours of admission. Review of typed notes dated 06/11/24, 09/15/24, and 12/15/24, and signed by Social Services Director (SSD) #568 revealed a quarterly care conference was held but did not include a list of who was present for the meeting and if a copy of the care plan was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. Record review revealed Resident #19 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including malignant neoplasm of stomach and esophagus, muscle wasting and atrophy, and hypertension. Review of a MDS assessment completed 11/27/24 revealed Resident #19's cognition remained intact, and he had no behaviors. Interview on 12/30/24 at 9:42 A.M. with Resident #19 revealed he asks for showers but never gets them unless a certain aide is working. Review of EMR for showers and shower sheets from 12/02/24 through 12/30/24 revealed three scheduled showers were missed on 12/04/24, 12/20/24, and 12/25/24. Interview on 01/08/25 at 9:59 A.M. with LPN #557 confirmed three showers were missing for Resident #19. Based on record review, resident interview, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents, who were dependent on staff for personal care, received the assistance needed to shower/ bathe when they were scheduled to receive them. This affected three (Resident #19, #147, and #149) of four…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-08 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Residents #4 and #19 were invited to participate in activities. This affected two residents (#4 and #19) of two residents reviewed for activities. The facility census was 52. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #4 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including venous insufficiency, hypertension, and gastro-esophageal reflux disease. Review of a care plan dated 03/16/24 revealed Resident #4 had an alteration in activity participation related to preferring independent activities and she preferred music, playing piano, reading, animals, and word puzzles. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #4's cognition remained intact, and she had no behaviors. Interview on 12/30/24 at 3:32 P.M. with Resident #4 revealed she did not participate in activities or do anything other than lay in her bed. Interview on 12/31/24 at 1:10 P.M. with Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) #503…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-08 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to address signs and symptoms of a urinary tract infection (UTI) in a timely manner for Resident #36. This affected one resident (#36) of one resident reviewed for UTIs. The facility census was 52. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #36 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including displaced intertrochanteric fracture of left femur, difficulty in walking, muscle wasting and atrophy, and hypertension. Review of a care plan completed on 11/21/24 revealed Resident #36 had an alteration in elimination related to indwelling Foley catheter with an intervention to monitor for signs and symptoms of a UTI such as elevated temperature, dysuria, flank pain, hematuria, foul smelling urine and report to provider to seek diagnosis and treatment. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed on 12/02/24 revealed Resident #36's cognition remained intact, no behaviors, required setup or clean-up help for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #4's oxygen tubing was changed once per week as ordered by the physician. This affected one resident (#4) of two residents reviewed for respiratory services. The facility census was 52. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #4 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including venous insufficiency, hypertension, and gastro-esophageal reflux disease. Review of a medication administrator record from December 2024 revealed Resident #4 had orders in place for oxygen at two liter per minute continuously via nasal canula as resident will allow (09/29/24), change oxygen tubing every week and as needed on Wednesdays (09/29/24), and change aerosol nebulizer set-up every week on Wednesday and as needed (09/29/24). Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #4's cognition remained intact, and she had no behaviors. Observation on 12/30/24 at 3:28 P.M. revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-08 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to address signs and symptoms of pain Resident #36 in a timely manner. This affected one resident (#36) of one resident reviewed for pain. The facility census was 52. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #36 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including displaced intertrochanteric fracture of left femur, difficulty in walking, muscle wasting and atrophy, and hypertension. Review of a care plan dated 11/21/24 revealed Resident #36 was at risk for an alteration in comfort related to generalized pain, gout, rheumatoid arthritis, and left femur fracture post-surgical repair. Interventions included, but were not limited to, medications as ordered to manage pain, monitor for increased levels of pain, and monitor for effectiveness of interventions. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed on 12/02/24 revealed Resident #36's cognition remained intact, no behaviors, and had a pain rating of seven,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-08 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #37, who received an antipsychotic medication, had an abnormal involuntary movement scale (AIMS) assessment completed to monitor the resident for any extrapyramidal side effects of the medication. This affected one resident (#37) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility assessment was 52. Findings include: Review of Resident #37's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included unspecified psychosis, unspecified dementia, and anxiety disorder. Review of Resident #37's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident's cognition was severely impaired. She was not known to have displayed any behaviors or reject care during the seven days of the assessment period. She was documented as having received antipsychotic medications during the seven-day assessment period. Review of Resident #37's physician's orders revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure stock medications were stored in its original packaging and in a manner that allowed the staff to identify the expiration date of that medication. This affected three (Resident #2, #6, and #12), who resided on the 200 hall and had orders to receive Tylenol Extra Strength medication and received medication from the 200-hall medication administration cart where the improperly stored stock medication was found. The facility census was 52. Findings include: On [DATE] at 8:07 A.M., a medication administration observation was made of Resident #12 receiving her morning medication. The medications were administered by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #527. The resident was given Acetaminophen 500 milligram (mg) (analgesic/fever reducer) two tablets by mouth as ordered three times daily, among multiple other medications due at that time. The Acetaminophen was pulled from a small stock bottle stored in the top drawer of the 200-hall…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-08 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. Review of Resident #11's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/25/23 and a reentry date of 06/12/24. Diagnoses include end stage renal disease, diabetes, morbid obesity, depression, cerebral infarction, and nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage. Review of the MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating Resident #11 had intact cognition. Further review revealed Resident #11 had orders for hemodialysis every Monday, Wednesday and Friday since 06/13/24. Review of assessments titled Dialysis Pre and Post Evaluation revealed missing assessments on 06/17/24, 06/19/24, 06/28/24, 07/01/24, 07/03/24, 07/10/24, 07/19/24, 07/24/24, 07/26/24, 07/29/24, 07/31/24, 08/28/24, 08/30/24, 10/04/24, 10/11/24, 10/18/24, 10/23/24, 11/01/24,11/04/24, 11/20/24 and 11/27/24. In an interview with LPN Unit Manager #557 on 01/02/25 at 3:00 P.M. he revealed that when Resident #11 returns from dialysis the paperwork completed at the dialysis center accompanies the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-05-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to initiate enhanced barrier precautions as required. This affected one (Resident #37) of three sampled residents and the potential to affect all 48 residents. The facility identified 21 residents on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP). Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #37 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease, diabetes mellitus and a history of Extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBL). Review of the Physician Orders dated 04/01/24 revealed the resident was on enhanced barrier precautions due to a history of ESBL and multi-drug resistant organism E-coli. On 05/06/24 at 9:00 A.M., observation revealed no EBP sign was posted outside Resident #37's room. On 05/08/24 at 10:01 A.M., observation revealed EBP sign was posted outside Resident #37's room and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #16 was observed in the room removing a trash bag of soiled items without the use of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure dependent residents received assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) and grooming as needed. This affected two residents (#7, #53) of three sampled residents. The census was 48. Findings include: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #7 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure with hypercapnia, end stage renal disease, hemodialysis and ventilator dependence. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #7 was cognitively intact for daily decision-making. Review of the Shower Sheets and Bathing Daily Task List dated April and May 2024 revealed Resident #7 receives a bed bath daily. There was no documentation of her hair being washed or assistance provided to remove her facial hair. Review of the care plan: Require Assistance with ADL's related to debility and weakness dated 03/13/24 revealed Resident #7's ADL goal was to remain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-10 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure competent nursing staff administered intravenous medications. This affected one (#47) of five residents observed for medication admininstration. The census was 48. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #47 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including sepsis, diabetes mellitus, and history of embolism. Review of the electronic Physician Orders dated May 2024 revealed intravenous medications including Meropenem (antibiotic) 1000 milligrams (mg) intravenous (IV) every 12 hours. On 05/06/24 at 10:53 A.M., observation revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #4 flushed Resident #47's left upper extremity PICC line (peripherally inserted central catheter) with 10 cc of normal saline and then administered Meropenem 1000 mg IV. Review of the eLicense Ohio Professional Licensure dated 05/09/24 revealed LPN #4's license was issued on 04/24/17 and was currently active for sub-category: medications. There was no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored appropriately and administered when dispensed. This affected two residents (#1, #3) from one of three medication carts observed during medication administration. The census was 48. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including asthma and atrial fibrillation. Medical record review revealed Resident #3 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including arteriosclerotic heart disease. On 05/06/24 between 7:12 A.M. and 7:16 A.M., interview and observation revealed the 100 hall medication cart top drawer was opened by Registered Nurse (RN) #2 and she stated unfortunately she had already pre-poured several resident medications for the morning medication administration. RN #2 stated she sometimes did this depending on what kind of day it was going to be and what all was going on. Observation of the top medication drawer revealed two…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-10 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered without error. This affected two (#5, #47) of five residents observed during 25 medication opportunities with four medications errors. The medication administration error rate was 16%. The census was 48. Findings include: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #5 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including atrial fibrillation, unspecified sequelae of cerebral infarction and constipation. Review of the electronic Physician Orders dated May 2024 revealed an order for Resident #5 to receive senna (laxative) 8.6 milligrams (mg) for bowel management. On 05/06/24 at 7:19 A.M., observation of Resident #5's morning medication administration revealed Registered Nurse (RN) #2 administered lisinopril, Hydralazine, toprol xl, benicar and senna plus (combination of a stool softener and laxative) 8.6 mg/50 mg. On 05/06/24 at 7:23 A.M., interview with RN #2 verified the above medications…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-01-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions in the kitchen. This had the potential to affect all 44 residents residing in the building. Findings include: Observation on 01/08/24 at 8:53 A.M. revealed there was heavy dust/grease build-up on the sprinkler heads and piping located above the six-burner gas stove. The metal can opener attached to the side of the prep table revealed there were metal shavings on the point of the opener and also on the indentation behind the metal spike. Interview on 01/08/24 at 8:53 A.M. with [NAME] #1 confirmed the sprinkler heads and piping above the stove and the can opener were not clean. Observation on 01/10/24 at 7:08 A.M. of the kitchen dry stock room revealed there was a metal scoop inside a clear plastic bin that was half-full of white flour. Further observation revealed there was a 112 ounce can of apple pie filling and a 50 ounce can of cream of chicken soup which were dented on the bottom seam. Interview on 01/10/24 at 7:08 A.M. with Dietary Manager (DM) #2 there was a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-18 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) documents, the facility failed to provide education to residents regarding influenza and pneumonia vaccines and failed to ensure residents received the recommended pneumonia vaccines. This affected four (Residents #15, #20, #32 and #97) of four residents reviewed for immunizations. The facility census was 44. Findings included: 1.Review of the medical record for Resident #20 revealed an admission date of 10/31/23 with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy, weakness, protein-calorie malnutrition, congestive heart failure, hyperlipidemia and transient ischemic attacks (TIAs). Review of the vaccine consent form for Resident #20 dated 11/23/23 revealed the resident did not wish to receive the influenza or pneumococcal pneumonia vaccine. The record did not include documentation regarding education provided to the resident regarding risks and benefits of the vaccines. Interview on 01/10/24 at 1:09 P.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the facility did not have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-18 · tag F0646 — isolated
    Notify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to complete and submit a new Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) for residents with a significant change in behaviors. This affected one (Resident #05) of two residents reviewed for PASARR screenings. The facility census was 44. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #5 revealed an admission date of 10/19/23 with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder, schizophrenia, psychological conversion disorder, anxiety disorder and history of traumatic brain injury. Review of the hospital discharge summary for Resident #05 dated 10/19/23 revealed the resident had diagnoses of anxiety and schizoaffective disorder and a history of psychiatric illness and had been on antipsychotic medications, Clozaril and Haldol, but was unable to take them while in the hospital. Review of the PASARR dated 11/02/23 revealed Resident #05 was admitted with diagnosis of mood disorder, schizophrenia and psychologic conversion disorder. The PASARR did not indicate Resident #05 was referred to state agency for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure the development of comprehensive resident care plans. This affected two (Residents #15 and #20) of 12 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 44. Findings include: 1.Review of the medical record for Resident #20 revealed an admission date of 10/31/23 with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy, transient ischemic attack (TIA) and congestive heart failure (CHF). Review of the physician orders for Resident #20 dated January 2024 revealed orders for order for oxygen at three liters per minute via nasal cannula. Review of the care plan for Resident #20 updated 11/29/23 revealed it did not include a plan of care related to oxygen therapy administration. Review of the nutritional progress note dated 12/28/23 at 3:31 P.M. the Dietary Technician #105 did not make any indications of Resident #20 using built up silverware with meals. Review of the care plan for Resident #20 updated 11/29/23 revealed the resident had a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to accurately assess residents' skin and obtain timely treatment for areas of impaired skin integrity. This affected two (Residents #01 and #35) of three residents reviewed for skin integrity. The facility census was 44. Findings include: 1.Review of the medical record for Resident #01 revealed an admission date of 02/27/23 with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure with hypercapnia, type two diabetes mellitus, severe morbid obesity, chronic kidney disease and obstructive sleep apnea. Review of the plan of care for Resident #01 dated 11/28/23 revealed the resident was at risk for impaired skin integrity/pressure ulcers related to fragile skin, impaired mobility and diabetes mellitus with a goal for open areas to be healed without complications. Interventions included the following: inspect skin during routine daily care, skin assessment as ordered, treatments as ordered. Review of the weekly skin assessments for Resident #01 dated 12/05/23, 12/19/23,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to accurately assess resident risk for falls and failed to ensure fall prevention interventions were implemented to prevent falls. This affected one (Resident #11) of one resident reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 44. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #11 revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia, atrial fibrillation, coronary artery disease, heart failure, hypertension, diabetes mellitus and respiratory failure. Review of the care plan for Resident #11 dated 02/28/23 revealed the resident was at risk for falls and potential injury related to debilitation, weakness, dementia and unsteady gait. Interventions included the following: minimize potential risk factors, bed stabilizers, lock bed, encourage resident to wear non-skid footwear, have commonly used articles within easy reach, low bed, maintain a clear pathway, provide…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-18 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with oxygen therapy as ordered. This affected one (Resident #11) of one resident reviewed for respiratory care. The facility census was 44. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #11 revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia, atrial fibrillation, coronary artery disease, heart failure, hypertension and respiratory failure. Review of the significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #11 dated 09/24/23 revealed the resident was moderately impaired for daily decision-making and had a life expectancy of less than six months. Review of the hospice care plan for Resident #11 dated 11/11/23 revealed the resident utilized oxygen therapy. Interventions including the following: collaborate with facility staff to ensure proper oxygen flow is prescribed, ensure nasal cannula was connected, ensure oxygen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-18 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide necessary behavioral health services to residents. This affected one (Resident #5) of one resident reviewed for behavioral health. The facility census was 44. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #05 revealed an admission date of 10/19/23 with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder, schizophrenia, psychological conversion disorder, anxiety disorder and history of traumatic brain injury. Review of the hospital discharge instructions for Resident #05 dated 10/19/23 revealed the resident was admitted to the hospital on [DATE] for cough, shortness of breath, low oxygen saturations and history of recurrent pneumonia. The medication list upon admission to the hospital included Haloperidol 5 milligrams (mg), take one half tablet by mouth at bedtime, Clozapine 100 mg, take three tablets by mouth at bedtime and Clozapine 25 mg, take three tablets by mouth every morning. Resident #05 had diagnoses of anxiety and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-18 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure physicians documented a rationale indicating why consultant pharmacist medication regimen recommendations were rejected. This affected one (Resident #32) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 44. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #32 revealed an admission date of 11/27/23 with diagnoses including respiratory failure, morbid obesity, type two diabetes mellitus, hyperparathyroidism, anxiety and depression. Review of the physician orders for Resident #32 revealed Resident #an order dated 11/27/23 for Lexapro 20 milligrams (mg) by mouth in the morning for depression. Review of the medication regimen review (MRR) per the consultant pharmacist for Resident #32 dated 12/01/23 revealed a recommendation to decrease the dosage of Lexapro 20 mg by mouth daily. Further review of the MRR revealed according to new dosing guidelines, the antidepressant Lexapro should no longer be used at doses greater than 10 mg per day in patients over the age of 60…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-18 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, review of alternate menu and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure alternate menu items included a variety based on resident preferences, likes or dislikes and failed to ensure residents knew what was on the alternate menu and where to find it. This affected two (Residents #15 and #20) of two residents reviewed for food preferences. The facility census was 44. Findings include: 1.Review of the medical record for Resident #15 revealed an admission date of 01/24/23 with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus, Parkinson's disease, tremors, osteoarthritis, generalized anxiety, hyperlipidemia and atrial fibrillation. Review of the physician orders for Resident #15 dated January 2024 revealed the resident was ordered a consistent carbohydrate, no added salt, regular texture diet with thin liquids. Review of the plan of care revealed for Resident #15 dated 01/24/23 revealed the resident had a potential for alteration in nutrition and hydration related to chronic diseases, therapeutic diet and body mass…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-18 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure residents were educated regarding the risk and benefits of Coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccination. This affected three (Residents #20, #32, and #97) of four residents reviewed for vaccines. The facility census was 44. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #20 revealed an admission date of 10/31/23 with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy, weakness, protein-calorie malnutrition, congestive heart failure, hyperlipidemia and transient ischemic attacks (TIAs). Review of the vaccine consent form dated 11/23/23 revealed Resident #20 did not wish to receive the COVID-19 vaccine. The record did not include documentation regarding education provided to the resident regarding risks and benefits of the COVID-19 vaccine. Interview on 01/10/24 at 1:09 P.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the facility did not have documentation of education to Resident #20 regarding the risks and benefits of the COVID-19 vaccine. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #97 revealed an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-11-14 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. Review of Resident #349's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including pneumonia, diabetes, severe protein calorie malnutrition, pacemaker, epilepsy, dementia, high blood pressure and anemia. Review of the admission MDS 3.0 assessment, dated 11/08/22 revealed the resident required staff assistance for activities of daily living. Review of the physician's orders for 11/2022 revealed an order to change aerosol nebulizer set-up every seven days and as needed (PRN) on night shift every Sunday. The resident also had an order for Ipratropium Bromide Solution 0.02 % 2.5 ml inhalation three times a day for COPD. On 11/07/22 at 12:30 P.M., 3:03 P.M. and 4:02 P.M. observation revealed the resident's nebulizer with tubing and mask were not dated or covered and laying on the resident's bed side stand uncovered. On 11/08/22 at 10:43 A.M. the nebulizer with tubing and mask were observed not dated or covered. On 11/08/22 at 10:57 P.M. interview with Licensed Practical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-14 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, facility policy and procedure and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #43's physician was notified timely regarding the resident's discharge against medical advice. This affected one resident (#43) of four residents reviewed for hospitalization. Findings include: Review of Resident #43's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/07/22 with diagnoses including cellulitis, difficulty walking and cognitive communication deficit. Review of the five-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 09/12/22 revealed the resident had moderate cognitive impairment and required extensive staff assistance with activities of daily living. Review of the progress note, dated 09/12/22 at 3:27 P.M. revealed the resident insisted on going home against medical advice (AMA) with her son. The son set up home health through the resident's primary care physician (PCP). Review of an undated Discharge Against Medical Advice (AMA) document revealed the named resident was being discharged AMA of the attending physician and the facility administration. The document…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-14 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to ensure written notification was provided related to bed hold procedures. This affected two residents (#27 and #44) of four residents reviewed for hospitalization. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #27's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/02/22 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, history of lung transplant, chronic kidney disease and rectal cancer. Review of the resident's payer source revealed the resident received Medicare Part A services. Review of the progress note, dated 11/02/22 at 3:52 P.M. revealed the resident was sent to the emergency room due to an abrupt onset of change in mental status. A subsequent progress note revealed the resident was admitted to the hospital with diagnoses including urinary tract infection, renal failure and metabolic encephalopathy. Record review revealed the resident did return from the hospital. Further review of the medical record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-14 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #95's plan of care was accurate and updated to reflect the resident's advance directives. This affected one resident (#95) of one resident reviewed for advanced directives. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #95 revealed an admission date of [DATE] with diagnoses including malignant neoplasm of upper lobe of right bronchus or lung, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery. Review of Resident #95's physician's orders for [DATE] revealed a Do Not Resuscitate-Comfort Care Arrest (DNRCCA) advanced directive. Continued review of Resident #95's medical record revealed a signed DNR Identification Form, dated [DATE] indicating Resident #95 selected to be a DNRCC-Arrest If this box is checked, the DNR Comfort Care Protocol is implemented in the event of a cardiac arrest or a respiratory arrest. Review of the plan of care, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #246, who required staff assistance for activities of daily living received adequate and timely assistance with nail care to maintain proper hygiene. This affected one resident (#246) of four residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) care. Findings include: Review of Resident #246's medical record revealed an 10/20/22 admission date with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a cerebral infarction affecting left non dominant side, severe protein calorie malnutrition, hyperlipidemia, failure to thrive and anemia. Review of the 10/21/22 activities of daily living plan of care revealed the resident had a self care deficit related to debility, hemiplegia, shortness of breath and weakness. The goal was for the resident's needs to be met through the review date. Review of the 10/26/22 five-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment revealed the resident was moderately impaired for daily decision making, required extensive assistance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure physician ordered anti-embolism stockings/(TED) hose were in place for Resident #2. This affected one resident (#2) of one resident reviewed for hemodialysis. Findings include: Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic kidney disease, protein calorie malnutrition, anxiety, congestive heart failure (CHF), end stage renal disease, osteoarthritis. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 09/26/22 revealed the resident's cognition was moderately impaired, he required extensive assistance from one staff member for bed mobility, dressing, and personal hygiene, and required extensive assistance from two or more staff members for transfers and toilet use. Review of the physician's orders for 11/2022 revealed an order for TED hose (anti-embolism stockings) to be on in the morning and off at bedtime. On 11/08/22 at 12:02 P.M.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-14 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to ensure wound care was provided using proper and adequate infection control techniques to decrease the risk of infection for Resident #349. This affected one resident (#349) of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings include: Review of Resident #349's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including pneumonia, diabetes mellitus, severe protein calorie malnutrition, pacemaker, epilepsy, dementia, high blood pressure and anemia. Review of the plan of care , dated 11/04/22 revealed the resident had actual impaired skin integrity/pressure ulcer related to Stage I (non-blanchable erythema of intact skin) pressure ulcer to right buttock and left rear hip and unstageable (obscured full-thickness skin and tissue loss) pressure ulcer to coccyx (as documented on admission). Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 11/08/22…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to ensure fall safety measures were in place for Resident #19 as planned. This affected one resident (#19) of three residents reviewed for accidents. Findings include: Review of Resident #19's medical record revealed a 09/27/22 admission and re-admission date of 10/13/22 with diagnoses including dementia without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance and mood disturbance, and anxiety, difficulty walking, muscle wasting and atrophy, muscle weakness, cognitive communication deficit, muscle wasting and atrophy, insomnia, osteoporosis and anxiety disorder. Review of the new admission assessment revealed the resident was at risk for falls due to impaired decision making, delusions, vision impaired, wandering, restlessness/agitation, needing assistance in activity of daily living self performance, unsteady gait, use of assistive device for mobility, bladder incontinence and involuntary of bowel, osteoporosis and vertigo. Interventions included bed stabilizers, lock bed, have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-14 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to ensure pureed food was prepared by the recipe to ensure it was served at the proper consistency. This affected two resident (#39 and #349) two residents who received pureed diets from the kitchen. Findings include: On 11/09/22 at 9:30 A.M. observation of the pureed food process revealed Dietary [NAME] (DC) #99 first obtained the temperature of the chicken (204.5 degrees Fahrenheit) and cauliflower (200 degrees Fahrenheit). DC #99 then placed the chicken in the food processor and added an unmeasured amount of hot water and broth. DC #99 pureed four ounces of chicken for both Resident #39 and Resident #349. Dietary [NAME] #99 then placed the cauliflower in the food processor and pureed two ounces of cauliflower without adding any additional liquids or items. DC #99 then placed the food items in bowls once completed. Review of the recipe, dated 10/13/22 for the pureed vegetable revealed when processing to gradually add food thickener and melted margarine to the vegetables…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-14 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #21's medical record was maintained in an accurate manner related to wound care. This affected one resident (#21) of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings include: Review of Resident #21's medical record revealed a 04/09/22 admission with diagnoses including orthopedic aftercare following surgical amputation, absence of right leg below knee, respiratory failure, peripheral vascular disease and anxiety. On 11/09/22 at 11:23 A.M. Resident #21 was observed sitting on the side of the bed dressed in street clothes. The resident's prosthetic leg was off and she had no dressing in place to the right stump. The resident had a dressing in place to her left heel. Review of the November 2022 treatment administration record revealed to monitor dressing to right medial amputation. The treatment order was signed off/documented as being completed twice a day. However, record review revealed a physician's order, dated 09/21/22 to discontinue the dressing to the resident's right stump. On 11/09/22…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CONTINUING HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.1-0.1 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 51.8+0.2 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 51.8+0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.3-0.3 vs chain
The other 11 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.1★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
BUNNER, MICHAELIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 06/08/2012
PARSONS, BENJAMINIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 07/16/2016
HUGHEY, TRACYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2026
KAUFFMAN, KEVINIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2024
CONTINUING HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/20/2026

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+2.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$422K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 11%Medicare 29%Other / private 61%

This home reported $422K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$404per resident / day
operating cost
$12,279per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$413per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 366443. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-01-08, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next