Crestwood Ridge Skilled Nursing And Rehab

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 22% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 50 beds and averages 46.6 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.18 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.52 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.91 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.87 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.31 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.55 to 0.45 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-01-16 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse. This resulted in an Actual Harm when Resident #12 was assaulted by Resident #39 on 01/11/25. Resident #12 was punched in the face and was temporarily unconscious. Resident #12 was evaluated at the local hospital, diagnosed with mild closed head injury, lip abrasion, and cervical strain. This affected one (Resident #12) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 47. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #12 revealed an admission date on 03/22/24. Diagnoses included intracranial injury with loss of consciousness on 06/29/23, major depressive disorder, dementia, personality disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, borderline personality disorder, bipolar two disorder, and post-traumatic stress disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/14/24, revealed that Resident #12 was cognitively intact. Resident #12 used a wheelchair to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-12-12 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation, review of dietary menus, and staff interview, the facility failed to serve all food items from the preplanned menu during meal service. This had the potential to affect all 44 residents in the facility. The census was 44. Findings include: Review of the dietary menu for week one, which contained the date of 12/11/24, revealed the meal was to include spaghetti sauce with meatballs, pasta, green beans, wheat bread, margarine, and cake. Observation on 12/11/24 at 11:32 P.M. revealed the cook was preparing the meals which included spaghetti sauce with meatballs, pasta, green beans, and cake. Further observation revealed the cook was not serving bread with the meals as indicated on the menu. Interview with Dietary Manager (DM) #167 on 12/11/24 at 2:07 P.M. verified the menu for 12/11/24 was to have wheat bread included with the meal and confirmed the facility did not serve bread on the lunch trays. DM #167 stated they just forgot to add the bread to the meal trays.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-12-12 · tag F0868 — widespread
  Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) staff sign-in sheets and staff interview, the facility failed to have QAPI meetings at least quarterly and failed to have all required members in attendance. This had the potential to affect all 44 residents in the facility. The census was 44. Findings include: Review of the QAPI meeting sign-in sheet dated 01/11/24 revealed the facility's administrator, owner, board member, or other individual in a leadership role was not in attendance for this meeting. Further review of the QAPI sign-in sheets revealed a meeting was held 03/12/24 and the next meeting was not held until 08/22/24. There was no documentation of a second quarter (April, May, or June) QAPI meeting occurring in 2024. Interview with the Administrator on 12/12/24 at 1:40 P.M. verified the facility did not have the administrator, owner, board member, or other individual in a leadership role attend the QAPI meeting on 01/11/24. The Administrator also verified the facility did not hold QAPI meetings at least quarterly as the facility had a meeting on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, medical record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a resident's dignity was maintained by placing a cover over a urinary catheter drainage bag. This affected one (#28) of three residents the facility identified as having indwelling urinary catheters. The facility census was 44. Findings include: Record review for Resident #28 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including muscle weakness, neuromuscular dysfunction, and spastic diplegic cerebral palsy. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #28 was assessed to have intact cognition and to have an indwelling urinary (Foley) catheter. Review of an active physician order dated 10/03/24 reveled Resident #28 was to have a 16 French Foley catheter in place. Observation on 12/09/24 at 12:40 P.M. revealed Resident #28 was lying in bed with the door open. The resident's Foley catheter drainage bag was hanging on the side…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed notify a physician of resident blood glucose levels when the level was above 400 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) as ordered. This affected one (#20) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 44. Findings include: Review of Resident #20's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/29/24. Diagnoses included type two diabetes mellitus, unspecified severe protein calorie malnutrition, respiratory failure, major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, and dysphagia. Review of Resident #20's physician order dated 03/29/24 revealed the resident was ordered Humalog Kwikpen subcutaneous (SQ) solution pen-injector 100 unit/ml to be injected as per sliding scale before meals and at bed time for diabetes as followed: for blood glucose levels between zero (0) and 149 mg/dL, notify the physician and administer no insulin; between 150 mg/dL and 199 mg/dL, give two (2) units of insulin; between 200 mg/dL and 249 mg/dL, give four (4) units of insulin; between 250 mg/dL and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0582 — isolated
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide a Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage (SNF ABN) after receiving Medicare Part A services at the facility as required. This affected three (#04, #28, and #40) of three residents reviewed. The facility census 44. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #04 revealed the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included diabetes mellitus, essential primary hypertension, schizoaffective disorder, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, and schizophrenia. Review of Resident #04's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed she was mildly cognitively impaired. Review of Resident #04's Medicare cut letter dated 09/20/24 revealed she was cut for Medicare skilled services effective 09/23/24; however, the facility failed to provide Resident #04 a SNF ABN. 2. Record review for Resident #28 revealed the resident admitted to facility on 11/28/24. Diagnoses included urinary…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0637 — isolated
  Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to complete a Significant Change in Status Assessment for a resident enrolled in a hospice program. This affected one (#44) of three residents reviewed for Minimum Data Set assessments. The facility census was 44. Findings include: Record review for Resident #44 revealed the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included dyskinesia, psychosis, essential primary hypertension, dementia, carbuncle, gout, depression, and adult failure to thrive. Review of Resident #44's progress notes dated 09/04/24 revealed the facility called to notify Resident #44's family of a change in condition. Further review of the progress notes confirmed Resident #44 was admitted to hospice services effective 09/12/24. Review of Resident #44's contract for hospice confirmed hospice services were effective on 09/12/24. Further review of Resident #44's medical record revealed no Significant Change in Status Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was completed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and medical record review, the facility failed to to ensure Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) documents were accurate regarding resident current conditions and diagnoses. This affected two (#23 and #27) of two residents reviewed for PASARR documents. The census was 44. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #27's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/14/23. Diagnoses included nephropathy induced by other drugs, type two diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, cellulitis, adult failure to thrive, hyperlipidemia, gout due to renal impairment, anxiety disorder, and bipolar disorder manic without psychotic features. Review of Resident #27's medical record revealed on 05/15/24 the resident had a new diagnosis of bipolar disorder manic without psychotic features. Review of Resident #27's most current PASARR dated 09/08/23 revealed there was no updated diagnosis of bipolar disorder manic without psychotic features. Interview with Regional Nurse #200 on 12/12/24…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed develop a plan of care to address a resident's post traumatic stress disorder. This affected one (#31) of one residents reviewed for behavior and emotional needs. The facility identified five residents with a diagnosis of post traumatic stress disorder. The facility census was 44. Findings include: Review of Resident #31's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/08/22 with diagnoses including traumatic brain injury, paranoid schizophrenia, hemiplegia affecting the left non-dominant side, psychotic disorder with delusions, auditory and visual hallucinations, suicidal ideations, paranoid personality disorder, major depressive disorder, hereditary and idiopathic neuropathy, post traumatic stress disorder, homicidal ideations, edema, and hyperlipidemia. Review of the 11/08/24 quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed Resident #31 was cognitively intact and used a wheelchair to aid in mobility. The resident was coded as having a diagnosis of post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Further review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-10 · tag F0623 — isolated
  Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #49's legal guardian was provided, in writing a transfer/discharge notice at the time the resident was transferred to the hospital as required. This affected one resident (#49) of three residents reviewed for hospitalization. The facility census was 47. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #49 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified psychosis, post-traumatic stress disorder, Bipolar disorder, schizoaffective disorder, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, suicide attempts, and intellectual disabilities. Review of admission records revealed this resident had a court appointed guardian, with an effective date of 06/13/22. The resident also had a Medicaid payor source. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #49 had a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of ten out of 15 which indicated she had moderate cognitive…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-10 · tag F0625 — isolated
  Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to provide a written bed-hold notice to Resident #49 and Resident #49's legal guardian at the time of the resident's transfer to the hospital as required. This affected one resident (#49) of three residents reviewed for hospitalization. The facility census was 47. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #49 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified psychosis, post-traumatic stress disorder, Bipolar disorder, schizoaffective disorder, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, suicide attempts, and intellectual disabilities. Review of admission records revealed this resident had a court appointed guardian, with an effective date of 06/13/22. The resident also had a Medicaid payor source. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #49 had a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of ten out of 15 which indicated she had moderate cognitive impairment.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CONTINUING HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $204K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH