Muskingum Skilled Nursing & Rehabilitation
501 Pinecrest Drive, Beverly, OH 45715 · For profit - Corporation · 50 certified beds · (740) 984-4262 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0610) — most recent May 2026
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (64) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $177,922 in federal fines (most recent 2025-08-13)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 3.1% | 5.3% | 15.4% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.2% | 6.2% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.4% | 0.2% | 0.9% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.4% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 17.6% | 30.1% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.7% | 3.2% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 3.2% | 6.1% | 16.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 24.2% | 25.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 94.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.4% | 3.4% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 27.0% | 21.4% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 6.7% | 8.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.8% | 1.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.0% | 75.6% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 19.4% | 24.9% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 17.0% | 12.9% | 12.0% | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
46.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 29 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 29% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 46.6%CMS range 31.6–62.9 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.1%CMS range 6.6–14.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.01 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 50 beds and averages 42.6 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.18 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.35 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.96 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.88 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.31 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.40 to 0.23 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
64 citations, most serious first. The 16 most serious are shown; the remaining 48 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, review of a facility self-reported incident (SRI), review of staff statements, review of the facility's abuse policy and procedure, and interviews, the facility failed to timely report and implement immediate and effective measures to protect residents following allegations of sexual abuse. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and the potential for actual harm including serious injury and psychosocial harm beginning on [DATE] at approximately 11:30 P.M. when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #108 notified the supervisor, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #115 she believed LPN #119 had assaulted Resident #22 and Resident #18 due to changes in the resident's behaviors, including yelling, screaming, crying, not complying with care, and shaking when LPN #119 was present with the resident(s). Upon notification, LPN #115 did not implement immediate safeguards to prevent further potential abuse including immediately assessing the residents, removing LPN #119 from resident care, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2022-07-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on the unprecedented global pandemic that resulted in the Presidential declaration of a State of National Emergency dated 03/13/20, The Department of Health and Human Services, Center for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) Memo QSO 20-20-ALL dated 03/20/20, Nursing Home Guidance from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), record review, review of the facility COVID-19 timeline, review of the county community COVID-19 transmission rate, review of staff time sheets, review of staff screening forms, review of resident and staff COVID-19 rapid point of care (POC) test results, review of the facility COVID-19 procedure policy and staff interview the facility failed to implement effective and recommended infection control practices to prevent the spread of COVID-19 as evidenced by the facility's failure to ensure staff did not provide direct resident care to residents while symptomatic of COVID-19, failure to ensure staff were properly screened for COVID-19 upon entrance into the facility and failed to ensure all staff utilized appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) during a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-05-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, policy review, and review of hospital records, the facility failed to ensure a resident experiencing a decline in respiratory condition who requested to be sent to the hospital for evaluation and treatment for shortness of breath had the hospital transfer request approved. The resident continued to decline for 24 hours until she was subsequently sent to the hospital as originally requested. This affected one resident (Resident #19) of one resident reviewed for change in condition. Actual Harm occurred on 03/18/26 when Resident #19, an alert and oriented resident with conditions of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and respiratory failure, exhibited a change in condition beginning on 03/08/26 as evidenced by shortness of breath, coughing and sputum production, on 03/18/26 the resident requested to go to the hospital due to difficulty breathing but the medical provider stated she would be monitored in-house. There was no evidence that Resident #19 was made…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-07-15 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical records review, emergency room records review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive, individualized and adequate pain management program to provide effective and timely pain relief to residents after falls with injury/fractures. Actual harm occurred on 06/22/24 at 10:31 P.M. when Resident #35 was not provided effective pain management following a fall with hip fracture on 06/22/24 with complaints of significant verbal and non-verbal indicators of pain. The resident was subsequently sent out to the emergency room for the fracture and continued pain on 06/23/24 at 7:15 P.M. (approximately 20 hours after the fall occurred). Actual harm occurred on 03/17/24 at 6:45 A.M. when Resident #22 experienced a fall that resulted in pain and a non-displaced fracture of the greater tuberosity and minimally impacted humeral neck fracture component of the left shoulder fracture. Although the resident complained of pain, pain medication was not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2023-12-04 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of abuse policy training/acknowledgement documents, facility policy review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Residents #15 and #17 were free from abuse. This affected two residents (#15 and #17) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 47. Actual psychosocial harm occurred, applying the reasonable person concept, on 10/31/23 to Resident #15, a resident with impaired cognition, when State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #111 took humiliating pictures of the resident with the staff member's cell phone without consent of Resident #15. The pictures were of Resident #15 lying in bed wearing an incontinence (Depends) undergarment with urine and stool. STNA #111 then sent said pictures to the Administrator, who printed the pictures and presented them on 10/31/23 in a morning meeting to additional administrative staff, including staff who were not clinical. Actual psychosocial harm and the potential for actual physical harm, occurred on 11/29/23 to Resident #17, a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-12-04 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, medication error log review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #17 received adequate monitoring following administration of a narcotic medication and a benzodiazepine medication simultaneously. In addition, the facility failed to ensure medications listed as an allergy were not administered to the resident. This affected one resident (#17) of three residents reviewed for change in condition. The facility census was 47. Actual harm occurred to Resident #17 on 10/01/23 when the resident was administered a narcotic medication (MS Contin) and a benzodiazepine medication (Ativan) simultaneously and failed to adequately monitor the resident for sedation as ordered by the prescriber resulting in the resident requiring administration of Narcan (opiate antagonist) and transfer to the hospital for evaluation. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #17 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-05-18 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interview, review of infection control log, review of facility assessment, and policy review the facility failed to ensure adequate staffing was in place to meet the needs of the residents were met. This had the potential to affect all 38 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of the infection control log dated May, 2026 revealed no evidence a log had been started. Review of the concern log dated April, 2025 to April, 2026 revealed the facility had no concerns reported each month. Interview on 04/28/26 at 10:32 A.M., with the Ombudsman revealed he had an open case that's been ongoing regarding call light response time and staff attitude. Residents had reported the staff attitudes had improved since the facility terminated a Certified Nurse's Aide employment, but it's not completely resolved. Interview on 04/28/26 at 2:44 P.M., with Scheduler/Dietary Manager/Human Resource #111 revealed the staffing level was determined by the census. On dayshift and nightshift, two nurses are scheduled. The Scheduler #111 indicated scheduled nursing was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-05-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and policy review.the facility failed to ensure food was prepared and served in a sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect 38 of 38 residents who received food from the kitchen. Findings include:Observations on 05/07/26 starting at 11:17 A.M. through 12:24 P.M. revealed the following:At 11:55 A.M., [NAME] #126 reached into a bag of bread without gloves and touched four pieces of the bread, she removed the third and fourth pieces of the bread from the bag to make a grilled cheese. Dietary Manager (DM) #111 asked [NAME] #126 to throw the bread away, wash her hands and get new bread out with gloves on but did not remove the other two pieces of bread from the bag which were touched.At 12:00 P.M. observations of the window sill revealed dust and debris, the ceiling above the food preparation area had large amounts of dust around the air vent and on sprinkler system waterlines, the walls in the food prep area had food splatters.At 12:13 P.M., [NAME] #126 was holding tongs over the bin of chicken, barehanded. She dropped the tongs into the chicken,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-05-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview, policy review, review of fit testing, and review of the infection control log, the facility failed to properly store nebulizer masks and tubing and failed to maintain a comprehensive infection control log and ensure staff were fit tested. This affected two residents (Resident #19 and #48) but had the potential to affect 38 residents residing in the facility. Findings include:1.Record review revealed Resident #19 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including end stage renal disease and atrial fibrillation. Review of a care plan dated 02/26/19 revealed Resident #19 had an alteration in oxygen exchange/perfusion related to chronic respiratory failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The goal was for lungs to be clean to auscultation and oxygen saturation above 90%, respirations to be unlabored, and show adequate oxygen perfusion. Interventions included but were not limited to evaluate shortness of breath for pain and discomfort when breathing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-05-18 · tag F0882 — widespreadDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of infection and antibiotic control logs, review of the facility assessment, interviews, and policy review the facility failed to ensure the Infection Preventionist (IP) dedicated time to IP duties to maintain a comprehensive infection control program. This affected Resident #31 and #48 with urinary tract infections but had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The census was 38. Findings include:1. Review of May 2026 infection control log revealed no evidence of any tracking or trending for May 2026 as of 05/13/26. Interview on 05/13/26 at 8:17 A.M., with Scheduler #111 confirmed Registered Nurse (RN) /Infection Preventionist (IP) #117 started working three 12-hour shifts on floor on 04/12/26. Prior to that RN/IP was working five eight-hour shifts. RN #117 was also the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) and Wound Nurse. The Scheduler confirmed she was not aware of the hours the IP was required to work. Interview on 05/13/26 at 10:36 A.M., with Registered Nurse (RN)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's interdisciplinary team including the residents participated in the care planning process including care plan conferences. This affected four residents (#1, #4, #28, and #31) of five residents reviewed for care conferences. The facility census was 38.Findings include: 1.Record review revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and type II diabetes. Review of a care conference sign in sheet dated 02/03/26 revealed individuals present at the care conference were Resident #1's representative, Director of Nursing (DON), and Social Services (SS) #108. Review of a care conference sign in sheet dated 04/08/26 revealed individuals present at the care conference were Resident #1's representative and SS #108. Interview on 05/04/26 at 11:01 A.M. with Resident #1 revealed she had not been asked to participate in care conferences and this is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-18 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident medical were complete, accurate, and readily accessible. This affected five residents (#3, #8, #41, #47, and #48) of 21 resident records reviewed. The census was 38. Findings include:1. Record review revealed Resident #03 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes, schizoaffective disorder, schizoaffective disorder, major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, seizures, sleep apnea, hypertension, gastro esophageal reflux disease, bipolar disorder, and mild intellectual disabilities. Review of Resident #03 assessment for PHQ 2-9 (brief depression screener) revealed an effective date of 01/08/26, and a created date of 05/01/26. Review of Resident #03 assessment for social determinants of health revealed an effective date of 01/08/26, and a created date of 05/01/26. Review of Resident #03 Brief Interview for Mental Status BIMS evaluation revealed an effective date of 01/08/26, and a created…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-18 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of hospice records, interviews, and policy review the facility failed to ensure a resident's hospice service and medical provider were notified of a medication error and failed to ensure a resident's physician and resident representative were notified of a new skin alteration. This affected one resident (#41) of one resident reviewed for medication errors and one resident (#40) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings include: 1.Medical record review revealed Resident #41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including encephalopathy, osteomyelitis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus, asthma, dementia, major depression, urge incontinence, anxiety, long QT syndrome, insomnia, pain, peripheral vascular disease, Vitamin D Deficiency restless leg syndrome, gastritis, constipation, occlusion and stenosis of carotid artery, hyperglycemia, hyperlipidemia, nocturia, and hypomagnesemia. The resident was a full code status, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-18 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to provide the Notice of Medicare non coverage (NOMNC) to Medicare beneficiaries at least two days before the end of a Medicare covered part A stay. This had the potential to affect one (Resident #50) of three residents reviewed for Notice of Medicare non coverage. The census was 48.Findings Include: Closed record review revealed Resident #50 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including type two diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder, nicotine dependence, major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, obstructive sleep apnea, atrial fibrillation, and hypertension.Review of Resident #50's Beneficiary protection notification revealed the residents last covered day of part A services was 11/11/25.Review of Resident #50 Beneficiary protection notification revealed the resident had been notified that coverage of services would end on the date on the notice [11/11/25] and that they could appeal this…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a shared resident bathroom was maintained in a sanitary manner. This affected one (Resident #31) of two resident's reviewed for environment. Findings Include: Interview on 04/28/26 at 2:52 P.M., 04/29/26 at 12:40 P.M., and 05/05/26 at 10:23 A.M., with Resident #31 revealed he had to share a bathroom with the room next door, and one of the male residents next door urinated and had bowl movements all over the bathroom and did not flush the toilet. Resident #31 shared photos from his phone of the unsanitary condition of the bathroom. The photos confirmed there was urine and bowel movements on the floors and toilet, and the toilet was not flushed. Interview on 05/13/26 at 9:21 A.M., with Housekeeping Supervisor (HKS) #113 confirmed Resident #31 had voiced concerns related to the male resident that shared a bathroom with him, missing the toilet when he urinated and he didn't flush. She stated the housekeeping staff cleaned all residents' bathrooms daily and upon request, which Resident #31 had requested additional…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of self-reported incident, review of concern log, observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of misappropriation was reported timely to the state agency. This affected one (Resident #41) of three reviewed for personal property. Findings Include: Medical record review revealed Resident #41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including encephalopathy, osteomyelitis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, obesity, depression, anemia, long QT syndrome, anxiety, pain, peripheral vascular disease, Vitamin D deficiency, restless legs syndrome, gastritis, constipation, occlusion and stenosis, hypomagnesemia, hyperglycemia, hyperlipidemia, and nocturia. Review of the concerns log dated 01/2026 to 05/2026 revealed there were no concerns that were reported in the last five months, including a missing wallet for Resident #41.Interview on 05/05/26 at 11:54 A.M., with Resident #41's wife revealed two or three weeks…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 48 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-18 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of concern log, review of self-reported incident, observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to timely investigate an allegation of misappropriation of a resident's wallet. This affected one (Resident #41) of three reviewed for personal property. Findings Include: Medical record review revealed Resident #41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including encephalopathy, osteomyelitis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, obesity, depression, anemia, long QT syndrome, anxiety, pain, peripheral vascular disease, Vitamin D deficiency, restless legs syndrome, gastritis, constipation, occlusion and stenosis, hypomagnesemia, hyperglycemia, hyperlipidemia, and nocturia. Review of the concerns log dated 01/2026 to 05/2026 revealed there were no concerns that were reported in the last five months, including a missing wallet for Resident #41.Interview on 05/05/26 at 11:54 A.M., with Resident #41's wife revealed two or three weeks after…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview the facility failed to ensure a resident had an individualized trauma informed plan of care. This affected one resident (#28) of four residents reviewed for behaviors.FIndings include: Record review of Resident #28's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including personality disorder, depression, generalized anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), personal history of suicidal behavior, poisoning by benzodiazepines, and sedative, hypnotic or anxiolytic dependence, in remission. Review of Resident #28's psychiatric note dated [DATE] revealed the resident had PTSD and was stable on Zoloft (anti-depressant) and Xanax (anti-anxiety). The resident had PTSD from watching a friend wreck and die on motorcycle when she was younger and it plays back in her head. She had attempted suicide. There was no documented evidence of triggers or individualized intervention. Review of Resident #28's quarterly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were dependent on staff were provided assistance with personal hygiene and bathing. This affected two residents (#19 and #25) of four residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The facility census was 38. Findings include:1.Record review revealed Resident #19 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including end stage renal disease and atrial fibrillation. Review of a care plan dated 12/19/23 revealed Resident #19 required assistance with ADLs related to debility and weakness. The goals included to continue to participate in ADLs as able and have no decline in ADLs through review; remain clean, dry, odor free and appropriately dressed through the review; and remain well-groomed and free of odors at all times and will participate in ADL self-care. Interventions included but were not limited to staff to adjust care as needed to meet resident's needs; staff to encourage resident to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure alternating air mattresses were on the correct setting to prevent pressure ulcers. This affected one resident (#19) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers and interventions. The facility census was 38. Findings include:Record review revealed Resident #19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including end stage renal disease and atrial fibrillation. Review of a care plan dated 10/24/21 revealed Resident #19 was at risk for impaired skin integrity related to decreased mobility, periods of bowel and bladder incontinence, bilateral lower extremity edema, oxygen per nasal cannula, history pressure ulcers, and prefers to lay on back. The goals were for excoriation will resolve without complication as occurrence arises and skin will be free of breakdown. Interventions included but were not limited to elevate heels off mattress, heel protectors as tolerated, inspect skin during daily care, lotion…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-18 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed medical record review, review of infection control log, review contingency medication list, and interview the facility failed to ensure an urinalysis was collected timely and antibiotics were administered per order to treat urinary tract infection. This affected one resident (#48) of five residents reviewed for urinary tract infections.Findings include:Closed medical record review revealed Resident #48 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia, anemia, scoliosis, and ulcerated proctitis. Review of Resident #48's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was always incontinent of urine. Review of Resident #48's alteration in elimination related to incontinent of bowel and bladder dated [DATE] and cancelled [DATE] revealed to administer all treatments per order and monitor for signs and symptoms of urinary tract infections: foul smelling urine, cloudy urine, sediment, decreased output. Notify physician of changes. Review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-18 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, laboratory test review, review of education material from the Cleveland Clinic, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate interventions were implemented for a resident with weight loss and compromised nutritional status. This affected one resident (#40) of three residents reviewed for nutrition. The census was 38.Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #40 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hypoglycemia, type 2 diabetes, dysphagia, benign prostatic hyperplasia, heart failure, major depressive disorder, insomnia, hallucinations, osteoarthritis, and mood disorder.Review of Resident #40's care plan initiated 08/09/25 revealed the resident was at risk for alteration in nutrition and hydration related to diabetes, and mechanically altered diet. Goals included the resident will be adequately nourished with no significant weight changes.Review of Resident #40's record revealed an order placed on 09/01/25 for monthly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-18 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interviews, and policy review the facility failed to administer oxygen to residents as ordered and failed to ensure appropriate use of oxygen. This affected two residents (#19, #15) of five residents reviewed for respiratory care. The census was 38.Findings include: 1.Record review revealed Resident #19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including end stage renal disease and atrial fibrillation. Review of a care plan dated 02/26/19 revealed Resident #19 had an alteration in oxygen exchange/perfusion related to chronic respiratory failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The goal was for lungs to be clear to auscultation and oxygen saturation above 90%, respirations to be unlabored, and show adequate oxygen perfusion. Interventions included but were not limited to evaluate shortness of breath for pain and discomfort when breathing and administer medications as ordered to relieve and provide oxygen per orders. Review of orders revealed an order…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-18 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents with known trauma were provided trauma informed care. This affected two residents (#28 and #36) of four residents reviewed for behaviors. The facility census was 38. Findings include:1.Record review revealed Resident #36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depression. Review of a care plan dated [DATE] revealed Resident #36 was at risk for impaired social interaction related to PTSD due to her sister passing away which causes her to be upset. The goals included being free of or have decrease in undesirable behaviors and interactions with others and will have no decreased/personally acceptable level of stress from past trauma. Interventions included but were not limited to encourage deep breathing exercises when she is in a stressful situation; encourage positive communication with others; encourage to participate in activities she enjoys; encourage to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-18 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interview, review of infection control log, and review of policies the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary medications. This affected one resident (#31) of five residents reviewed for urinary tract infections and one resident (#10) of six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic systolic heart failure, acute kidney failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pneumonia, sepsis, retention of urine, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, prostatic hyperplasia without lower UTI system, varicose veins, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, edema, obstructive an reflux uropathy, Barrettes esophagus with dysplasia, voice and resonance disorder, laryngeal spasm, foot pain, opioid dependence, ventral hernia, leg pain, hypertension, and anxiety. Review of Resident #31's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-18 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of facility investigation, review of Medscape drug information, review of policies, job description reviews and interviews the facility failed to prevent a significant medication error. This affected one resident (Resident #41) of three residents reviewed for hospice services. The facility census was 38. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including encephalopathy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus, asthma, dementia, major depression, long QT syndrome (condition affecting repolarization (relaxing) of the heart after a heartbeat. It results in an increased risk of an irregular heartbeat which can result in fainting, drowning, seizures, or sudden death), insomnia, pain, peripheral vascular disease, occlusion and stenosis of carotid artery. The resident was a full code status, and allergies included Duloxetine, Morphine, and Betadine. Review of Resident #41's orders revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-18 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interview, review of hospice contracts and hospice documentation review the facility failed to ensure hospice plans and visits were maintained at the facility and failed to ensure the facility contactwas identified for hospice service contact. This affected three residents (Resident #41, #47 and #48) of four residents reviewed for hospice services. The facility census was 38. Findings include: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including encephalopathy, osteomyelitis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus, asthma, dementia, major depression, urge incontinence, anxiety, long QT syndrome, insomnia, pain, peripheral vascular disease, Vitamin D Deficiency restless leg syndrome, gastritis, constipation, occlusion and stenosis of carotid artery, hyperglycemia, hyperlipidemia, nocturia, and hypomagnesemia. Review of Resident #41's hospice contract dated [DATE] revealed the facility shall ensure hospice…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-04 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate indwelling catheter care, failed to ensure residents received adequate indwelling catheter education upon discharge, failed to ensure urine was obtained per orders, and failed to ensure bladder assessment was accurate on admission. This affected two (Resident #44 and Resident #45) of three reviewed for bladder impairments. Findings included: 1. Closed record review revealed Resident #44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on [DATE]. The residents' diagnoses included metabolic encephalopathy, pneumonia, severe protein-calorie malnutrition, bladder neck obstruction, hydronephrosis, generalized anxiety, malignant neoplasm of prostate, and depression. He had a history of dysphagia, edema, and heart disease. Review of Resident #44's discharge hospital notes dated [DATE] revealed a foley catheter was placed and would need a chronic foley catheter as he was a poor surgical candidate. The resident was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-15 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure beds were the appropriate size for residents. This affected one (Resident #39) of one resident reviewed for positioning. The facility census was 46. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #39 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including syncope and collapse, dementia, hyperlipidemia, and intellectual disabilities. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed on 05/03/24 revealed Resident #39 had moderately impaired cognition and was independent for bed mobility. Observation on 07/08/24 at 9:03 A.M. revealed Resident #39 was laying diagonal in bed with his feet over the edge because the bed was not long enough. Observation on 07/08/24 at 11:13 A.M. revealed Resident #39 was laying diagonal in bed with his feet over the edge. When asked if his bed was long enough, Resident #39 shook his head no. Interview on 07/09/24 at 10:26 A.M. with Resident #39 revealed he was not comfortable in his bed because he…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-15 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review,interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure care conferences were offered in conjunction with minimum data set (MDS) reviews. This affected two (Resident #2 and #39) of two residents reviewed for care conferences. The facility census was 46. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #2 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including heart failure, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, and anemia. Review of a quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #2's cognition remained intact. Review of completed MDS' revealed Resident #2 had quarterly MDS assessments completed on 08/29/23, 11/27/23, 02/26/24, and 05/25/24. Review of Multidisciplinary Care Conference assessments revealed care conferences were held on 08/18/23, 02/28/24, and 04/30/24. There was no record of a care conference because held in conjunction with the MDS completed on 11/27/23. Interview on 07/08/24 at 5:23 P.M. with Resident #2 revealed the resident could not recall having care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and observations, the facility failed to ensure pressure ulcer interventions were in place. This affected three ( Resident #36, #26, and #12) of three residents reviewed for skin breakdown. The facility census was 46. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #36, revealed an admission date of 06/12/24. Diagnoses included but were not limited to displaced fracture of base of neck of right femur, subsequent encounter for closed fracture with routine healing, metabolic encephalopathy, unsteady on feet and need for assistance with personal care. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 07 out of 15 indicating severe cognitive impairment. The resident was assessed to require setup or clean-up assistance with eating, oral hygiene, substantial/maximal assistance with toilet hygiene, bed mobility, sit to stand and dependent with bed and toilet transfers. The resident was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to have fall interventions in place for Resident #3 and #12. This affected two (Resident #3 and #12) out of four reviewed for accidents. Facility census was 46. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #3 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease, dementia, type 2 diabetes mellitus, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, depression, and anxiety. Review of plan of care dated 11/06/23 revealed Resident #3 was at risk for falls and potential injury related to impaired vision, psychoactive medication, vertigo, impaired balance, dementia, and syncope. Interventions included low bed and to monitor that the bed was in the low position due to Resident #3 would elevate the bed when playing with the controls. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #3 had a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 12 out of 15 which indicated cognitive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-27 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and interviews, the facility failed to notify a resident's family prior to a transfer to another facility. This affected one resident (#22) of four residents reviewed for resident rights. The facility census was 40. Findings included: Record review revealed Resident #22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, respiratory failure, hypertension, schizoaffective disorder, hypothyroidism, dementia, dysphagia, anxiety disorder, and osteoarthritis. Review of a minimum data set (MDS) assessment completed on 12/04/23 revealed Resident #22 had moderately impaired cognition and was transferred to another facility on 12/04/23. Review of a discharge assessment completed on 12/04/23 revealed the discharge instructions were given to Resident #22. Review of nursing note from 11/30/23 at 8:09 P.M. entered by the Administrator revealed Resident #22's son was spoken with regarding a transfer to a new facility for behavior…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-12-04 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staffing schedule review, time card report review, facility assessment review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to provide registered nurse (RN) coverage daily for a minimum of eight consecutive hours. This affected all 47 residents residing within the facility. Findings include: Review of the Staffing Schedules dated September 2023, October 2023 and November 2023 revealed no evidence a RN was scheduled on 09/16/23, 09/17/23, 09/30/23, 10/01/23, 10/15/23, 10/28/23, 10/29/23 or 11/19/23. Review of the staffing Time Card Reports dated 09/16/23, 09/17/23, 09/30/23, 10/01/23, 10/15/23, 10/28/23, 10/29/23 and 11/19/23 revealed no evidence a RN worked the required minimum of eight consecutive hours. Review of the Facility assessment dated [DATE] revealed the facility provided a RN for at least eight hours daily. Review of the undated policy: Minimum Staffing Requirements revealed the facility will maintain sufficient staffing to provide, in a timely manner, adequate services and care to meet…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-12-04 · tag F0943 — widespreadGive their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, review of facility documentation of abuse training, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure training was provided to staff following an incident of resident abuse. This affected all 47 residents residing in the facility. Findings included: Review of Resident #15's medical record revealed she was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, unspecified psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological disorder, hypothyroidism, and essential hypertension. Review of Resident #15's Clinical Resident Profile revealed she had a guardian. Review of Resident #15's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 09/01/23, revealed the resident was cognitively impaired. Further review revealed she was sometimes able to express ideas and wants and was able to sometimes understand verbal content. Additionally, the assessment revealed she was always incontinent of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-04 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, resident record review, review of abuse policy acknowledgement, review of the facility's Self-Reported Incidents (SRIs), and facility policy review, the facility failed to report an occurrence of abuse and failed to report an occurrence of abuse timely to the state survey agency. This affected two residents (#15 and #17) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 47. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #15's medical record revealed she was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, unspecified psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological disorder, hypothyroidism, and essential hypertension. Review of Resident #15's Clinical Resident Profile revealed she had a guardian. Review of Resident #15's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 09/01/23, revealed the resident was cognitively impaired. Further review revealed she was sometimes able to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-04 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, resident record review, review of abuse policy acknowledgement, review of the facility's Self-Reported Incidents (SRIs), and facility policy review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate resident abuse. This affected two residents (#15 and #17) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 47. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #15's medical record revealed she was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, unspecified psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological disorder, hypothyroidism, and essential hypertension. Review of Resident #15's Clinical Resident Profile revealed she had a guardian. Review of Resident #15's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 09/01/23, revealed the resident was cognitively impaired. Further review revealed she was sometimes able to express ideas and wants and was able to sometimes understand verbal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-04 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, facility transfer/discharge documentation, facility bed hold documentation, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents received appropriate notice of transfer/discharge and bed hold and failed to ensure the Ombudsman was notified. This affected two residents (#17 and #48) of three residents reviewed for transfer/discharge and bed hold notice. The facility census was 47. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #48's medical record revealed an initial admission date of 07/22/23 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Arnold Chiari Syndrome with hydrocephalus, type two diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic kidney disease, stage four (sever), and chronic congestive heart failure. Review of Resident #48's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 11/01/23, revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #48's progress note, dated 11/02/23 and timed 10:56 A.M., revealed she was complaining…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, resident record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents had comprehensive care plans developed and implemented. This affected two residents (#17 and #22) of seven residents reviewed for care planning. The facility census was 47. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #22's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/04/22 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, unspecified dementia, unspecified psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition, unspecified anxiety disorder, and essential hypertension. Review of Resident#22's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 08/22/23, revealed the resident was not cognitively intact. Further review revealed she did not exhibit physical, verbal or other behavioral symptoms towards others. Review of Resident #22's progress notes for the month of November 2023 revealed 14 notes referring to behavioral concerns with residents and staff. Review of Resident #22's progress note,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and resident record review, the facility failed to ensure supervision for a resident while eating as recommended by the speech therapist. This affected one resident (#17) of twelve residents reviewed for quality of care. The facility census was 47. Findings included: Review of Resident #17's medical record revealed an initial admission date of 02/06/23 and a readmission date of 10/03/23 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, respiratory failure, essential hypertension, and dysphagia. Review of Resident #17's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 09/11/23, revealed the resident was cognitively impaired. The resident needed supervision with setup help only with eating and did not have a swallowing disorder. Review of Resident #17's physician order, dated 09/05/23 to November 2023 revealed a regular diet, regular texture and regular (thin liquid) consistency, no straws. Review of Resident #17's Speech Therapy Treatment Encounter Note, dated 09/11/23, revealed speech therapy discharge completed and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-04 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to provide appropriate urinary incontinence care. This affected one of one resident (#40) observed for incontinence care. The facility census was 47. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #40 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis, dementia, schizoaffective disorder and constipation. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #40 was severely impaired for daily decision-making, required staff to assist with personal hygiene, and was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. Review of the care plan: Alteration in Elimination: No control present with bowel and bladder, dependent on staff for peri-care and toileting needs (revised 04/05/18) revealed interventions including to apply barrier cream to peri area as prevention and provide incontinent care as needed. On 11/28/23 between 11:03 A.M. and 11:31 A.M.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-04 · tag F0711 — isolatedEnsure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure physician progress notes were readily available for review. This affected one resident (#17) of three residents reviewed for discharge/transfer/bedhold notice. The facility census was 47. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #17 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, respiratory failure, schizoaffective disorder and dementia. Review of Resident #17's Progress Notes revealed she was evaluated at the emergency room on [DATE], 10/03/23 and 10/05/23 for changes in condition. Review of the medical record revealed no physician progress notes for review. On 11/30/23 at 10:23 A.M., interview with Registered Nurse (RN) #182 verified there were no physician progress notes available for review on the medical record. On 11/30/23 at 12:48 P.M., interview with RN #182 verified there was no documented evidence in the electronic or paper medical record of an assessment or progress note…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-04 · tag F0712 — isolatedEnsure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure physician and nurse practitioner (NP) visits alternated as required. This affected one resident (#17) of three residents reviewed for discharge/transfer/bedhold notice. The facility census was 47. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #17 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, respiratory failure, schizoaffective disorder and dementia. Review of the Nurse Practitioner (NP) #184 Progress Note dated 07/28/23, 08/31/23 and 10/12/23 revealed an assessment and treatment plan was documented. Review of the electronic and paper medical record revealed no physician progress notes for review. On 11/30/23 at 10:23 A.M., interview with Registered Nurse (RN) #182 verified there was no evidence the physician evaluated Resident #17 or alternated evaluations/assessments with NP #184. On 11/30/23 at 12:48 P.M., interview with RN #182 verified there was no documented evidence in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-04 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, personnel record review, job description review and interview, the facility failed to ensure nurse staff administering medications were competent in their duties and ensured the medications were administered appropriately. This affected one resident (#8) of four residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 47. Findings include: Review of State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #143's personnel record revealed she was licensed by the State of Ohio as a Certified Medication Aide on 08/17/23. Review of the certified medication aide Job Description signed 08/17/23 revealed essential duties and responsibilities included to report to the nurse the following: a resident refusal of medications, any deviation from the delegated medication administration, any unanticipated resident reaction to the medication administration, or anything that causes concern about the condition of the resident. On 11/28/23 at 7:34 A.M., observation revealed STNA #143 administered oral medications to Resident #8 and offered Miralax (laxative) as ordered to Resident #8.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-04 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and resident record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate behavioral care when Resident #22 was presenting with escalating behavioral needs. This affected one resident (#22) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 47. Findings included: Review of Resident #22's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/04/22 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, unspecified dementia, unspecified psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition, unspecified anxiety disorder, and essential hypertension. Review of Resident#22's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 08/22/23, revealed the resident was not cognitively intact. Further review revealed she did not exhibit physical or verbal behavioral symptoms towards others. Review of Resident #22's comprehensive plan of care revealed no care plan regarding aggressive verbal or physical behaviors toward other residents or staff. Review of Resident #22's progress notes for the month of November 2023 revealed 14 notes referring to behavioral concerns with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-04 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, medication insert review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to ensure both rapid-acting and long-acting insulin's were administered timely and inhalation medications were administered without error. This affected two residents (#2 and #39) of four residents. Three errors were observed during 26 opportunities resulting in a medication administration error rate of 11.54%. Findings include: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #39 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus and Alzheimer's disease. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #39 received daily insulin injections for diabetes mellitus. On 11/28/23 at 7:41 A.M., observation revealed State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #143 prepared Resident #39's oral medications. STNA #143 stated she was also a certified medication aide (MA-C) and could not administer insulin and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #136 would come to the unit to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-28 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, facility failed to ensure Pre-admission Screenings/Resident Reviews (PASARR) were accurate. This affected two residents (#43 and #49) of three residents reviewed. The facility census was 45. Findings included: 1. Record review revealed Resident #43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including paraplegia, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, chest pain, atrial fibrillation, anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder. Review of Resident #43's PASARR revealed diagnoses of anxiety disorder and major depressive disorder were not screened for level two review for mental health. 2. Record review revealed Resident #49 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, type II diabetes, and chronic kidney disease. Review of Resident #49's PASARR revealed diagnoses of anxiety disorder and major depressive disorder were not screened for level two review for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-07-14 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of staffing schedules for May 2022, review of daily nurse staffing postings for 05/28/22 thru 05/29/22, time reports and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure they had Registered Nurse (RN) coverage for eight consecutive hours seven days a week as required. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. Findings include: A review of the facility's nursing schedule for May 2022 revealed there was not a RN scheduled to work for either the day shift (7:00 A.M. to 7:00 P.M.) or night shift (7:00 P.M. to 7:00 A.M.) on 05/28/22 or 05/29/22. The scheduled identified which nurses were scheduled based on an x being placed across from their names in the boxes for a particular date. The empty box indicated the nurse did not work on those days. There were only two RN's included on the schedule for May 2022 with nine LPN's. A review of the daily nurse staffing posting for 05/28/22 and 05/29/22 revealed there were no RN hours recorded for either the day shift or the night shift on those dates. The daily nurse staff posting indicated the number…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-07-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure dependent residents were assisted with activities of daily living to include showers and nail care. This affected four residents (Residents #16, #26, #35, and #40) of five residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The census was 45. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #16's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/04/22 with diagnoses including chronic atrial fibrillation, pacemaker, anxiety, and heart failure. Review of the personal and cultural preferences plan of care initiated 04/08/22 revealed the resident preferred to shower on Wednesday and Sunday (twice per week). Review of the Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition and was dependent of one staff with bathing. On 07/05/22 at 10:33 A.M. interview with Resident #16 revealed she was not getting showers and today was the first shower she had in four weeks. The resident stated she maintained cleanliness by wiping off by herself.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-07-14 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interview and policy review the facility failed to ensure residents were afforded the opportunity to make choices about their care. This affected one resident (Resident #16) of six residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The census was 45. Findings include: Review of Resident #16's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/04/22 with diagnoses including chronic atrial fibrillation, pacemaker, anxiety, and heart failure. Review of the admission Packet V11 dated 04/04/22 revealed the resident preferred to receive showers three days per week (Tuesday, Thursday and Saturday) in the evening. Review of the personal and cultural preferences plan of care initiated 04/08/22 revealed the resident preferred to shower on Wednesday and Sunday (twice per week). Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 dated 04/14/22 revealed the resident was cognitively intact and required extensive assistance of one staff member with transfers, dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene. The resident was dependent of one staff member for bathing/showers. The resident was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-07-14 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and policy review the facility failed to ensure advanced directives were accurate and reflected resident wishes. This affected one resident (Resident #16) of two residents reviewed for advanced directives. The census was 45. Findings include: Review of Resident #16's medical record revealed an admission date of [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic atrial fibrillation, pacemaker, anxiety and heart failure. Review of the physician orders dated [DATE] revealed the resident was a Do Not Resuscitate Comfort Care Arrest (DNR-CCA) (permits the use of life saving measures before a person's heart or breathing stops. However, only comfort care may be provided after a person's heart or breathing stops). Review of the Multidisciplinary Care Conference Form dated [DATE] revealed the resident wished to be a full code and the resident/family expectations would be a full code status. Review of the my advance directive is DNR-CCA care plan dated [DATE] revealed intervention including advanced…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-07-14 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure preadmission screening and resident reviews were completed with a significant change in resident status. This affected one resident (Resident #35) of two residents reviewed for preadmission screening and resident review. The census was 45. Findings include: Review of Resident #35's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/15/03 with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis, major depression, dementia without behavioral disturbance, personality disorder and other specified mental disorders due to known physiological conditions. The last pre-admission screening review dated 08/27/03 revealed the resident had no indications of serious mental illness nor developmental disabilities. Further review of the medical record revealed the diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder depressive type dated 05/16/16 was added. Review of the physician orders revealed the resident received zyprexa (antipsychotic medication) by mouth every evening for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of the hospice agreement, review of hospice records, and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain an integrated medical record that included hospice nurse visit notes for the purposes of ensuring continuity of care between entities. This affected one (Resident #50) of one resident reviewed for hospice services. Findings include: A review of Resident #50's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of congestive heart failure (CHF) and emphysema. A review of Resident #50's physician's orders revealed he was admitted to hospice/ palliative care for the terminal diagnosis of CHF. The order was given on 06/03/22. A review of Resident #50's hospice plan of care revealed the resident was to receive one visit from the hospice nurse bi-weekly (every two weeks). A review of Resident #50's care plans revealed he had a care plan in place for receiving hospice services. The care plan was initiated on 05/27/22. The interventions included the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-14 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed record review, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure pressure ulcer care and interventions were implemented. This affected one resident (Resident #26) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The census was 45. Findings include: Review of Resident #26's closed medical record revealed an admission date of [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia without behavioral disturbance and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of the at risk for impaired skin integrity related to decreased mobility, periods of bladder incontinence, oxygen per nasal cannula, fragile skin, history of pressure ulcers and resident noted to prefer to sit in a chair as opposed to laying in a bed initiated [DATE] with interventions including alternating air mattress to bed, barrier cream/ointment after each incontinence episode as needed; encourage fluids; encourage resident to elevate bilateral lower extremities while at rest; encourage resident to turn and reposition every two hours;…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and policy review the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive fall investigation was completed and interventions were implemented to prevent falls. This affected one resident (Resident #39) of three residents reviewed for accidents. The census was 45. Findings include: Review of Resident #39's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/06/19 with diagnoses including legal blindness and schizoaffective disorder. Review of the physician orders revealed no physician ordered fall prevention interventions. Review of the Fall Risk Evaluation- V2 completed 02/24/22 identified the resident as a fall risk. Review of the Fall Investigation dated 03/07/22 revealed the resident yelled and was observed lying at the foot of her bed with the bedside table extended to it's highest level. The resident had a history of non-compliance with medical recommendations/safety recommendations. The fall followed a pattern similar to the resident's previous falls but no root cause was identified and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-14 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview and policy review the facility failed to follow infection control guidelines related to incontinence care for a resident at risk for urinary tract infections. This affected one resident (Resident #35) of one resident observed for incontinence care. The census was 45. Findings include: Review of Resident #35's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/15/03 with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis, major depression, dementia without behavioral disturbance and constipation. Review of the alteration in elimination related to no control present with bowel and bladder initiated 03/24/14 with interventions including provide incontinence care as needed; check and change routinely and as needed; monitor for signs and symptoms of urinary tract infection. Review of the risk for infection related to incontinence of bowel and bladder with no sensation of need related to multiple sclerosis causing an increased risk of urinary tract infections initiated 03/24/14 with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-14 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed record review and interview the facility failed to ensure comprehensive meal intake documentation was available to adequately monitor resident nutritional status. This affected one resident (Resident #26) of three residents reviewed for nutrition. The census was 45. Findings include: Review of Resident #26's closed medical record revealed an admission date of 12/27/18 with diagnoses including dementia without behavioral disturbance, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and sleep apnea. In 2019, macular degeneration and changes in retinal vascular appearance bilaterally was added to her diagnoses list. Review of the potential for alteration in nutrition and hydration related to medical diagnoses, COPD needs higher, nutritional risk, therapeutic diets, history of protein storage depletion, history of significant weight changes implemented 12/27/18 with interventions including obtain food preferences, provide diet as ordered, dietician referral as needed, supplements and weights as ordered.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-14 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure a resident's oxygen flow rate was set as ordered and failed to provide education to a resident on the risks of increasing the flow rate with a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder. This affected one resident (Resident #40) reviewed for respiratory care. The facility census was 45. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #40 revealed an admission date of 01/10/22 with diagnoses including acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, congestive heart failure, malignant neoplasm of left lung, chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder, and type two diabetes mellitus. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated Resident #40 was cognitively intact, had no impairment to range of motion to bilateral upper extremities and received oxygen therapy. Review of the current physician orders for 07/2022 revealed Resident #40 was to receive oxygen at two-three…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-07-14 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure pharmacy recommendations pertaining to gradual dose reduction (GDR) attempts for psychoactive medications were responded to by the physician and/ or psychiatrist to include a resident specific rationale as to why a GDR attempt was contraindicated. This affected two (Resident #7 and #40) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: 1. A review of Resident #7's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included major depressive disorder (MDD) and anxiety disorder. A review of Resident #7's physician's orders revealed the use of Duloxetine HCL (Cymbalta) 60 milligrams (mg) by mouth twice a day for MDD. The order had been in place since 11/17/21. A review of a pharmacy recommendation dated 05/12/22 revealed the facility's contracted pharmacist recommended Resident #7's physician consider a GDR for the use of Cymbalta as the resident had been on Cymbalta 60 mg…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-07-14 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interview and policy review the facility failed to ensure gradual dose reductions were attempted for residents receiving antipsychotic medications. This affected one resident (Resident #22) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The census was 45. Findings include: Review of Resident #22's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/30/17 with diagnoses including diabetes, depression, schizophrenia and atrial fibrillation, Review of the physician orders revealed zyprexa (antipsychotic medication) 20 milligrams (mg) one tablet by mouth daily written on 01/16/20. The medication was scheduled for administration at bedtime. Review of the pharmacy recommendation dated 04/19/22 revealed the resident has been taking the antipsychotic medication, Zyprexa 20 mg every night at bedtime since January 2020. Please evaluate the current dose and consider a dose reduction. The physician response dated 05/17/22 revealed no change- see psych note and medical record review- 04/20/22. Review of the psychiatry note dated 04/20/22 revealed no evidence a GDR…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-14 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, product instructions for use, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure their medication error rate did not exceed 5%. The facility had three errors out of 29 opportunities for error for a medication error rate of 10.3%. This affected two (Resident #6 and #44) of three residents observed for medication administration. Findings include: 1. A review of Resident #44's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and hypertension (HTN). A review of Resident #44's physician's orders revealed the resident had an order to receive Metoprolol Tartrate (a beta blocker used in the treatment of hypertension) 25 milligrams (mg) by mouth (po) twice a day for HTN. The orders included parameters to hold the medication if the resident's systolic blood pressure (SBP) was less than 90 millimeters of mercury (mm/hg) or her pulse was less than 50 beats per minute (BPM). The resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-07-14 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and policy review the facility failed to ensure follow-up occurred related to consultation recommendations and dental extraction aftercare. This affected two residents (Resident #26 and #46) of four residents reviewed for dental services. The census was 45. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #26's closed medical record revealed an admission date of 12/27/18 with diagnoses including dementia without behavioral disturbance and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of the resident is at risk for oral/dental health problems related to having top and bottom partials; staff assistance provided daily with oral hygiene and denture care implemented on 09/21/21 with interventions including encourage application of dental adhesive to assist with eating Review of the Clinical Notes Report dated 12/29/21 revealed the resident needed all of her remaining teeth extracted and referred for dentures. Tooth #10, #11, #24, #25, #26 and #27. No aftercare instructions were noted in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-07-14 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents received the Influenza and Pneumococcal vaccines when consenting to receive them. This affected two (Resident #7 and #10) of five residents reviewed for immunizations. Findings include: 1. A review of Resident #7's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included morbid obesity, adult onset diabetes mellitus, and stage 3 chronic kidney disease. A review of Resident #7's Influenza vaccine consent form revealed the resident consented to receive the Influenza vaccine. The form was dated and signed by the resident on 10/25/21. A review of Resident #7's Immunization Report revealed the resident last received the Influenza vaccine on 10/01/20. There was no documented evidence of the resident receiving the Influenza vaccine after he had consented to receive it on 10/25/21. On 07/12/22 at 10:30 A.M., an interview with the Director of Nursing revealed they did not have any documented…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-07-14 · tag F0886 — failed to test for COVID-19 as required — isolatedPerform COVID19 testing on residents and staff.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure reasons for obtaining a COVID-19 test, date the COVID-19 test was performed, and the results of the COVID-19 test were documented in the resident's medical record as required. This affected one (Resident #31) of one residents reviewed for transmission based precautions related to COVID-19. Findings include: A review of Resident #31's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included end stage renal disease, dependence on renal dialysis, hypertension, and morbid obesity. His diagnoses list was updated to reflect he was COVID-19 positive on 06/27/22. A review of Resident #31's physician's orders revealed an order for the resident to be placed in droplet isolation for 10 days due to being COVID-19. The order was given on 06/27/22. A review of Resident #31's nurses' progress notes revealed there was no documentation to show why the resident was tested for COVID-19. The progress notes also…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$177,922 in federal fines across 3 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $38,636 — penalty dated 2025-08-13
- $34,938 — penalty dated 2024-07-15
- $104,348 — penalty dated 2023-12-04
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-12-30 for 37 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to CONTINUING HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.1 | -1.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 1.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 1.8 | +0.2 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
The other 11 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.1★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| BUNNER, MICHAEL | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/13/2014 |
| MALLETT, CHRISTOPHER | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/13/2014 |
| PARSONS, BENJAMIN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/13/2014 |
| SPRENGER, MARK | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/13/2014 |
| SPRENGER, TIMOTHY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/13/2014 |
| HUGHEY, TRACY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2026 |
| KAUFFMAN, KEVIN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/01/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $237K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OH
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365461. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-18, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.