No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Arcadia Valley Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation

25675 East Main Street, Coolville, OH 45723 · For profit - Corporation · 50 certified beds · (740) 667-3156 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (740) 667-3156 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0607, F0610) — most recent May 2024Resident-funds citations (F0568, F0569)1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$13,627 in federal fines
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0568, F0569)
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (56) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $13,627 in federal fines (most recent 2024-09-18)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
805 Farson St · (740) 401-0033 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1649 Harris Hwy · (304) 863-3051 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
20 Orange St · (740) 667-3630 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
25577 Cemetery Rd · (740) 667-6973

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased2.7%5.3%15.4%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.6%6.2%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.4%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms6.2%30.1%6.5%typical
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.3%3.2%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened1.6%6.1%16.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication31.9%25.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.6%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control23.0%21.4%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table5.1%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.6%1.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%75.6%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission20.0%24.9%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit16.0%12.9%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.181.731.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days3.301.801.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

38.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 31 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

38.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
64.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.22U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.10hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 64.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 25 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 26% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF38.6%CMS range 26.0–52.351.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.4%CMS range 6.3–13.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge64.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge56.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge48.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay2.8%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization9.4%CMS range 5.3–15.77.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.881.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.86
RN hours/ resident / day
0.66
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.50
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.02
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.59
RN hoursweekends
50.0%
Total nursing turnover
55.6%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 50 beds and averages 39.5 residents a day — about 79% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.02 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.86 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.50 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.78 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.12 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.97 to 0.59 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

17
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-26)
14
at the previous standard inspection (2024-05-20)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

56 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 45 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-09-18 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on closed record review, review of the facility's timeline and related investigation, review of an emergency medical services (EMS) run report, staff interview, review of employee files, and policy review, the facility failed to provide basic life support, including CPR, to Resident #44 as per the resident's advance directives, when the resident was found unresponsive and without a pulse/ heartbeat. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and serious life-threatening harm, negative health outcomes, and subsequent death on [DATE] at 10:30 P.M. when Resident #44 did not receive CPR, due to the facility staff inaccurately identifying the resident's code status as being a Do Not Resuscitate Comfort Care Arrest (DNRCC-A) from a report sheet, instead of a full code that was identified in her medical record and what she elected, as part of her advanced directives upon admission to the facility.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure food was stored in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This had the potential to affect 37 residents. The census was 37.Findings include: Observation of the kitchen beginning at 8:34 A.M. on 03/23/26 revealed two packs of nickels hot dog buns expired as of 03/08/26, two packs of hamburger buns expired as of 03/15/26.In the stand up freezer one open improperly sealed, undated, and unlabeled bag of 2 meat patties was observed.One bag containing several portioned pieces of cookie dough were opened, improperly sealed, unsealed, and unlabeled.One bag containing several hot dogs was opened, and unsealed.One bag containing 5 chicken patties was undated.One half- pound package of ground turkey was opened and improperly sealed with the raw turkey outside of the package.In the stand up refrigerator in the kitchen one gallon of whole milk had expired as of 03/21/26, and undated unlabeled bowl of an unknown substance covered with tin foil with MM written on it was present.One container…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure multi-use insulin flex pens were stored properly prior to use, insulin flex pens were dated when first used, and inhalers were not left at the bedside unless there was a physician's order to do so. This affected three residents (#3, #4, and #18) of three residents identified by the facility as having the use of insulin that was stored in the [NAME] Unit medication administration cart, and one resident (#5) of five residents observed during medication administration. Findings include: 1. On 03/26/26 at 9:45 A.M., an observation of the medication administration cart for the [NAME] Unit (Rooms 21-37) revealed there were insulin Flex Pens (multi-dose insulin injectable dispensing pen) noted to be stored in the top drawer of the medication administration cart that had not been used yet and/ or without dates written on them when they had been put in use. 1 a.) Resident #3 was noted to have a Semglee (Glargine Insulin) 100 units (u)/…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident and/ or their representative gave informed consent for the use of psychotropic medications. This affected one resident (#44) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include:Review of Resident #44's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included a malignant neoplasm of an unspecified part of an unspecified lung, malignant neoplasm of the vulva, basal cell carcinoma of the skin, depression, and anxiety disorder. Review of Resident #44's physician's orders revealed the resident had orders to receive Diazepam (an anti-anxiety medication) 5 milligrams (mg) by mouth (po) every 12 hours as needed (prn) for anxiety. The order originated on 03/18/26. She also had an order to receive Venlafaxine HCL (an anti-depressant) 75 mg po every morning for depression. That order was present upon her admission. Review of Resident #44's medication administration record (MAR) for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0568 — isolated
    Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received copies of their quarterly statements from their resident fund accounts. This affected one resident (#37) of five residents reviewed for resident fund accounts. The facility census was 37. Findings include:Record review revealed Resident #37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of a minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #37's cognition remained intact and she had no behaviors. Review of Resident Council minutes dated 02/10/26 revealed there was a concern residents were not receiving statements from their personal account. Interview on 03/23/26 at 1:29 P.M. with Resident #37 revealed she does not receive a copy of her personal statements, but information was reviewed verbally. Resident #37 stated she would prefer a paper copy of her statement. Review of Resident #37's resident fund account revealed no evidence of a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's physician was notified the resident's equipment used for treatment of lymphedema was broken for over a month impacting the treatment the resident was to receive. This affected one resident (#37) of one resident reviewed for lymphedema pumps. The facility census was 37. Findings include:Record review revealed Resident #37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Review of a minimum data set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #27's cognition remained intact, she had no behaviors, was dependent on staff for toileting hygiene, and was occasionally incontinent of bowel and bladder.Review of a care plan dated 09/03/25 revealed Resident #37 had edema to lower extremities related to lymphedema. The goal was to maintain current level of socialization and maintain current physical level abilities. Interventions included bilateral lower…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of a Beneficiary Notice list, review of a Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) Beneficiary Protection Notification Review form, review of liability notices, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received the appropriate liability notices, when their Medicare (MCR) Part A services ended, and they remained in the facility. This affected one resident (#11) of three residents reviewed for beneficiary notices. Findings include: Review of a Beneficiary Notice list of all residents, who were discharged from a MCR covered Part A stay, with benefit days still remaining in the past six months revealed Resident #11 was identified as having a discharge date from MCR Part A services on 10/21/25. She was also indicated on that list to have remained in the facility following her discharge from MCR Part A services. Review of a Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) Beneficiary Protection Notification Review form completed by the facility revealed Resident #11 began receiving MCR Part A skilled services on 09/11/25. Her last covered day of MCR Part A services was on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable environment for residents. This affected two residents (#20, #4). The census was 37.Findings include:1.Interview on 03/23/26 at 10:22 A.M. with Resident #20's Representative #800 revealed there were some environmental concerns with the resident's room. The door does not close all the way, you have to slam it to shut it. The light above the resident's bed does not work, there is no string to pull it, so they have to turn the light on above the other bed. The walls look bad, there are scuff marks everywhere on doors, walls, damage to the dry wall, paint peeled off. The drawers don't close all the way, and there are drawers without fronts on them, so they're not useable.Observation on 03/23/26 at 10:25 A.M. revealed Resident #20's room had several scuff marks on the bathroom door and along the walls. Above the resident's head of bed on the wall revealed torn paint and dry wall, and scuff marks. The overhead light above the resident bed did not have a draw string and was unable to be turned on.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and interview the facility failed to ensure residents or their representative received a bed hold notice upon transfer. This affected one resident (#20) of three residents reviewed for hospitalization. The census was 37.Findings include:Record review revealed Resident #20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral infarction, dysphagia, chronic kidney disease stage 3, anemia, and supraventricular tachycardia. Interview on 03/23/26 at 10:19 A.M. with Resident #20's power of attorney revealed the resident was sent to the hospital on [DATE] due to pulling out her feeding tube (Jejunostomy tube (J-tube). Resident #20's power of attorney revealed they did not receive a bed hold notice upon transfer/ discharge. Review of Resident #20's progress notes revealed a note dated 03/19/26 at 11:53 P.M. that Resident #20 was being sent to the Emergency Department due to pulling out her J-tube. Review of Resident #20's progress notes revealed a note dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for a resident with post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). This affected one resident (#2) of three residents reviewed for development and implementation of the comprehensive care plan. The census was 37. Findings include:Record review revealed Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes, asthma, aphasia, multiple sclerosis, von Willebrand disease, insomnia, urinary retention, anxiety, post traumatic stress disorder, and major depressive disorder.Review of Resident #2's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed on 02/09/26 revealed diagnoses of peripheral vascular disease, urinary tract infections, hyperlipidemia, aphasia, multiple sclerosis, anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder. Review of the resident's record revealed no documentation of a care plan related to post traumatic stress disorder including goals and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure care conferences were scheduled in conjunction with the minimum data set (MDS) assessments quarterly. This affected one resident (#1) of two residents reviewed for care conferences. The facility census was 37. Findings include:Record review revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including paranoid schizophrenia, type II diabetes, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of a minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1's cognition remained intact and he had behaviors including hallucinations, delusions, and refusing care one to three days during the review period. Review of the MDS listing revealed Resident #1 had assessments completed 07/12/25, 10/12/25, 01/12/26, and one scheduled for 04/12/26. Review of care conferences revealed Resident #1 had care conferences on 07/16/25, 10/10/25, and 02/13/26. Interview on 03/24/26 at 11:19 A.M. with Social Worker (SW)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 45 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents requiring assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) received nail care and showers as scheduled. This affected two residents (#33 and #44) of four residents reviewed for ADL assistance. The facility census was 37. Findings include:1.Record review revealed Resident #33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy, type II diabetes, and dementia. Review of a care plan dated 07/03/25 revealed Resident #33 required assistance with ADLs related to cognitive impairment, dementia, and weakness. The goals were to continue to participate in ADLs as able and have no decline in ADLs through the review, and remain clean, dry, odor free and appropriately dressed through the review date. Interventions included but were not limited to requiring non-weight bearing assistance (including steadying, contact guard assistance or guided maneuvering) with shower, and staff will…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the bowel protocol was followed when residents did not have bowel movements for three days or longer. This affected two residents (#37, #44) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure a resident received physician ordered treatment for lymphedema. This affected one resident (#37) of one resident reviewed for lymphedema pumps. The facility census was 37. Findings include:1a.Record review revealed Resident #37 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of a minimum data set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #27's cognition remained intact, she had no behaviors, was dependent on staff for toileting hygiene, and was occasionally incontinent of bowel and bladder. Review of the bowel record revealed Resident #37 did not have a bowel movement from 03/01/26 through 03/06/26 or 03/08/26…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure interventions to prevent pressure injuries were in place. This affected one resident (#6) of two residents reviewed for pressure injuries. The facility census was 37. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia and hypertension. Review of an order dated 09/17/25 revealed Resident #6 had a pressure reducing mattress to bed. Review of a care plan dated 09/23/25 revealed Resident #6 was at risk for impaired skin integrity/pressure ulcers related to concussion and decreased mobility. Goals included skin to be free of breakdown and open areas will be healed without complications. Interventions included but were not limited to air mattress to bed at all times, elevate heels off mattress, inspect skin during routine daily care, liquid protein daily for wound healing, lotion to skin as needed, medications as ordered, pad and protect skin as needed, peri-care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide indwelling urinary catheter care. This affected one resident (#20) of six residents reviewed with indwelling urinary catheters. The census was 37.Findings include:Medical record review revealed Resident #20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral infarction, dysphagia, chronic kidney disease stage 3, anemia, and supraventricular tachycardia.Review of Resident #20's admission minimum data set (MDS) assessment completed on 03/12/26 revealed the resident had an indwelling urinary catheter.Review of Resident #20's care plan dated 03/10/26 revealed the resident is at risk for infection or worsening infection due to indwelling medical devices, urinary catheter, and J-tube for nutrition.Review of Resident #20's care plan revealed completed on 03/10/26 revealed the resident has an alteration in elimination related to indwelling urinary catheter. Interventions include Foley catheter care every shift and as needed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received dental services. This affected one resident (#14) of three residents reviewed for dental services. The facility census was 37. Findings include:Record review revealed Resident #14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia and anemia. Review of an order dated 08/27/24 revealed Resident #14 may see audiology, vision, dental, and podiatry. Review of a care plan revised on 03/26/25 revealed Resident #14 was at risk for oral/dental health problems related to natural teeth. The goal was to remain free from oral/dental complications through the next review date. Interventions included coordinate arrangements for dental care and transportation as needed/ordered (07/24/24); require oral inspections with oral care and report changes to a nurse (07/24/24); monitor/document/report to physician as needed signs and symptoms or oral problems needing attention: pain, abscess, debris in mouth, lips cracked or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's indwelling urinary catheter's collection bag was maintained off the floor reducing the risk of infection. This affected one resident (#44) of two residents reviewed for indwelling urinary catheters. Findings include:Review of Resident #44's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included a malignant neoplasm of an unspecified part of an unspecified bronchus or lung, malignant neoplasm of the vulva, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, retention of urine, and difficulty walking. Review of Resident #44's physician's orders revealed the resident had an order to maintain an indwelling urinary catheter related to the diagnosis of retention of urine. The order had been in place since the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. There was also an order to change her catheter bag every week on Tuesdays. Review of Resident #44's active care plans revealed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to ensure all mechanical, electrical, and patient equipment was in safe operating condition. This affected one resident (#37) of seven residents who are dependent on mechanical lifts for transfer. The census was 37.Findings include:Medical record review revealed Resident #37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and muscle weakness.Review of Resident #37's minimum data set (MDS) assessment completed on12/02/25 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. Resident #37's minimum data set revealed the resident was dependent of staff for toileting, personal hygiene, and bed mobility and transfers. Observation on 03/26/26 at 8:51 A.M. revealed Resident #37 being transferred from bed to chair with a mechanical lift with Certified nurses aide (CNA) #128, and CNA#164. Upon lifting the resident from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store and prepare food in a sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect 42 of 42 residents at the facility. Findings included: Observation during an initial tour of the kitchen with Dietary Manager (DM) #142 on 05/13/24 at 8:54 A.M. revealed two bags of salad with a best by date of 05/12/24 in the refrigerator. DM #142 confirmed findings. Continuous observations of the lunch tray line were made on 05/15/24 from 12:14 P.M. to 12:44 P.M. revealed: 1. Dietary Aide (DA) #109 used the back of her right wrist to rub her nose. DA #109 did not change her gloves or wash her hands. 2. Seven trays were sent out to be served on the [NAME] hallway with bowls of grapes left open to air. 3. Dietary [NAME] (DC) #123 sorted meal tickets to be placed on trays. While sorting, DC #123 licked her fingers to help separate papers. The tickets then went onto resident trays. 4. DA #109 took her right glove off, wiped her right hand on her pants, then applied a new glove without performing hand hygiene. 5. DA #109 used the back of her right…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-20 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of beneficiary protection notification review form, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #40 and #41 were provided appropriate liability notices when cut from Medicare Part-A services with benefit days remaining and remained in the facility. This affected two residents (#40 and #41) of two residents reviewed who remained in the facility after being cut from Medicare Part-A services. Findings included: 1. Record review revealed Resident #40 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute bronchitis, need for assistance with personal care, muscle weakness, pain in thoracic spine, difficulty in waking, and altered mental status. Review of the beneficiary protection notification review form (undated) revealed Resident #40 was discharged from Medicare Part A with benefit days remaining on 02/18/24 and remained in the facility. The resident did not receive an Advance Beneficiary Notice (ABN) form CMS-10055 due to the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-20 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had privacy while in their room. This affected one resident (#38) of one resident reviewed for privacy. The facility census was 42. Findings included: Record review revealed Resident #38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hyperkalemia, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, acute kidney failure, and type II diabetes. Review of a quarterly minimum data set completed on 03/22/24 revealed Resident #38's cognition remained intact and she had no behaviors. 1. Review of a nursing note dated 04/11/24 at 11:06 A.M. by Director of Nursing (DON) revealed Resident #38 had declined a room change after being kept awake the previous night by her roommate. Review of an undated page of interventions for Resident #38's roommate revealed no interventions to prevent rummaging through Resident #38's belongings. Review of an updated sticky note revealed interventions for Resident #38's privacy to be maintained included cups with lids,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-20 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were invited to participate in care planning upon admission and quarterly reviews. This affected two residents (#15 and #22) of three residents reviewed for care planning. The facility census was 42. Findings included: 1. Record review revealed Resident #22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy, type II diabetes, and congestive heart failure. Review of an admission minimum data set (MDS) revealed Resident #22's cognitive function remained intact and she had no behaviors. Review of a Multidisciplinary Care Conference assessment dated [DATE] revealed a care conference was held via telephone and participants included administration, social worker, and Resident #22's family/friend. Interview on 05/13/24 at 11:29 A.M. with Resident #22 revealed she had not been invited to participate in a care conference and was not aware the facility had a social worker. Interview on 05/14/24 at 4:14 P.M.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-20 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure residents were assessed and provided activities per preference. This affected one resident (#247) of one reviewed for activities. Findings included: Record review revealed Resident #247 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including malignant neoplasm of bone, type two diabetes, diabetic retinopathy with macular edema unspecified eye, visual loss, anxiety, depression, spinal stenosis, arthritis, sleep disorder, and heart disease. Review of Resident #247's activity participation review dated 03/15/24 revealed the resident's activity preference was blank. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment section indicated the resident was interviewed and it was somewhat important to do her favorite activities. Further review of Resident #247's medical record (paper and electronic) revealed no evidence the resident's activity preferences were reviewed or evidence a new assessment was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were in place per the resident plan of care. This affected one resident (#10) of one reviewed for falls. Findings included: Record review revealed Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including muscle weakness, dementia, macular degeneration, difficulty walking, lack of coordination, and fracture of right humerus. Review of Resident #10's nurses notes dated 05/2023 to 05/2024 revealed Resident #10 had fallen 07/17/23, 09/01/23, 01/20/24, and 04/25/24. Review the Resident #10's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] to 10/03/23 revealed no evidence the falls that occurred on 07/17/23 or 09/01/23 were captured on the MDS assessment. Review of Resident #10's fall plan of care initiated on 01/01/23 and revised on 01/18/24 revealed on 03/14/22 an intervention was added to have a low bed with mat on floor. On 02/15/22 a new intervention was added to place the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-20 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, review of a resident's meal ticket, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident, who had a history of a significant weight loss, received nutritional interventions as ordered. This affected one resident (#35) of three residents reviewed for nutrition. Findings include: Review of Resident #35's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included morbid obesity, moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, muscle wasting and atrophy, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), mild cognitive impairment of unknown etiology, schizo-affective disorder, heart failure, and major depressive disorder. Review of Resident #35's physician's orders revealed her diet included a consistent carbohydrate diet, regular texture, and regular consistency. She was also to receive super cereal and super potatoes (higher calorie foods) every day. Review of Resident #35's care plans revealed she had a care plan in place for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-20 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medically related social services were provided to residents to monitor behavioral health concerns. This affected one resident (#10) of two residents reviewed for behaviors. The facility census was 42. Findings included: Record review revealed Resident #10 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of a quarterly minimum data set completed 04/03/24 revealed Resident #10 had moderately impaired cognitive skills, verbal behaviors one to three days, other behaviors one to three days, and refused care one to three days. Review of a care plan revealed Resident #10 had a behavior problem related to Alzheimer's disease, depression, and anxiety, is followed by [NAME] psych for frequently yelling out; Resident #10 has an alteration in mood with depression, anxiety, related to anxiety disorder with target behaviors…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-20 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, family interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure narcotic pain medication ordered on an as needed (prn) basis included parameters to direct the nurses on when to administer it and failed to administer another controlled narcotic medication for the reason it was ordered for. This affected one resident (#26) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: Review of Resident #26's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included Parkinson's disease, congestive heart failure (CHF), unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbances, emphysema, anxiety disorder, schizophrenia, unspecified psychosis, and psychotic disorder with delusions. Review of Resident #26's physician's orders revealed she had an order to receive Norco (controlled narcotic pain medication used for the treatment of moderate to severe pain) 5-325 milligrams (mg) by mouth (po) every four hours prn for pain. She also had an order to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-20 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than 5%. There were 26 opportunities for error and two observed errors resulting in the medication error rate of 7.69 percent. This affected one resident (#33) of three residents observed for medication administration. Findings included: Record review revealed Resident #33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hypothyroidism, low back pain, chronic pain, and fractures of the left femur, humerus, and sacrum. Review of Resident #33's current order dated 05/2024 revealed on 04/08/24 new orders were received to administer Synthroid 125 micrograms (mcg) early (4:00 A.M. to 6:00 A.M.) on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. Further review revealed to administer Diclofenac Sodium external gel 1% four grams (gm) to knees, ankles, foot topically every shift for pain. Observation of Resident #33's medication administration with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #126 on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview, review of medication administration records, review of the pharmacy list for expiration dates for insulin, and policy review the facility failed to ensure medications were stored properly and medications were not expired. This affected one resident (#38) residing on the East unit. Finding included: Review of Resident #38's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis including type two diabetes. Review of Resident #38's orders and medication administration record dated 05/2024 revealed on [DATE] the resident's insulin order was changed to Humalog pen inject per sliding scale. If blood sugar 0-300 no insulin required, blood sugar 301-400 give four units, blood sugar 401-600 give six units. Check blood sugar before meals and at bedtime. The resident did not receive the Humalog from [DATE] to [DATE]. Observation and interview on [DATE] at 2:21 P.M. and 3:00 P.M. of East medication cart with Licensed Practical Nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview, and policy review the facility failed to maintain infection control practice while administering eye drops. This affected one resident (#6) of two observed for administration of eye drops. Finding included: Record review revealed Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including macular degeneration and dry eyes. Review of Resident #6's orders and medication administration records dated 05/2024 revealed to instill one drop of Artificial Tear Solution 1% in both eyes twice daily. Observation on 05/15/24 at 8:43 A.M. of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #139 administering eye drops to Resident #6 revealed the LPN washed hands and applied gloves and administered artificial tears to Resident #6's left eye. The LPN removed her gloves and applied a new pair of gloves without performing hand hygiene. The LPN administered artificial tears to the right eye and removed her gloves and left the room without performing hand hygiene after removing the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-23 · tag F0624 — isolated
    Prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of a medication error report and the facility's related investigation, review of hospital records, staff interview, family interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided with a safe and orderly discharge as she was discharged home without clear discharge instructions. The resident was also given a medication belonging to another resident when the nurse had pulled the resident's medications from the medication administration cart and sent them home with the resident's husband without reviewing her medications. This affected one (Resident #46) of three residents reviewed for discharge. Findings include: A review of Resident #46's closed medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included a UTI, altered mental status, and a psychotic disorder with hallucinations. A review of Resident #46's physician's orders revealed she was ordered to receive Cephepime HCL (an antibiotic) 2,000 milligrams (mg) intravenously…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-30 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — pattern
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, facility failed to notify resident physicians and responsible parties when residents tested positive for COVID-19. This affected 11 residents (#2, #22, #27, #33, #40, #44, #66, #69, #77, #89, and #99 ) of 19 residents reviewed for COVID-19. The facility census was 40. Findings included: 1. Record review revealed Resident #66 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis, type II diabetes, asthma, and major depression. Review of nursing note from 11/16/23 revealed Resident #66 tested positive for COVID-19, and the resident's physician was not notified. 2. Record review revealed Resident #40 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease, dementia, and hypertension. Review of nursing note from 11/17/23 revealed Resident #40 tested positive for COVID-19, but the resident's physician was not notified. 3. Record review revealed Resident #27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, facility failed to wear personal protection equipment (PPE) including N-95 respirator masks appropriately in isolation rooms. This had the potential to affect all 40 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 40. Findings included: Observation on 11/30/23 at 7:51 A.M. revealed State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #133 entering room [ROOM NUMBER], which was a COVID isolation room, wearing a surgical mask underneath an N-95 respirator mask. This breaks the seal of the N-95 respirator mask. Interview on 11/30/23 at 8:01 A.M. with STNA #133 confirmed she was wearing a surgical mask under her N-95 respirator and she was unaware it could cause the seal of the N-95 to break. Observation on 11/30/23 at 9:00 A.M. revealed Housekeeper #199 entering room [ROOM NUMBER], which was a COVID isolation room, wearing a surgical mask underneath an N-95 respirator mask. This breaks the seal of the N-95 respirator mask. Interview on 11/30/23 at 3:34 P.M. with Director of Nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, resident council minute review, housekeeping checklist review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment. This affected one resident (#24) of three residents reviewed regarding environment and the poor condition of the shower chair had the potential to affect 32 of 43 all residents residing in the facility (11 residents received bed baths and did not go to the shower room (#4, #12, #13, #17, #21, #23, #27, #29, #30, #34, and #41) . The facility census was 43. Findings included: 1. Observation on 11/02/23 at 7:48 A.M. of the bedside commode beside Resident #24's bed revealed there was a yellow liquid with an ammonia odor and small brown formed substance in it. The ammonia odor was noted prior to looking in the bedside commode. Observation on 11/02/23 at 9:45 A.M. of the bedside commode beside Resident #24's bed revealed there was a yellow liquid with an ammonia odor and small brown formed substance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-14 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, resident record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's room was maintained for easy mobility in a wheelchair. This affected one Resident (#24) of three residents reviewed for mobility. The facility census was 43. Findings included: Review of Resident #24's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute cystitis with hematuria, acute kidney failure, metabolic encephalopathy, difficulty in walking, essential hypertension, and dementia. Review of Resident #24's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 09/09/23, revealed she was cognitively impaired and needed the supervision of one person for locomotion on the unit. Observation on 11/02/23 at 7:48 A.M. of Resident #24's roommate's bed near the window in the room. The bottom of the bed was two and one half feet from the bathroom entrance. There was also a bedside commode two feet from the bathroom door and directly in front of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-14 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, resident record review, facility Self-Reported Incident (SRI) review, time punch documentation and facility policy review, the facility failed to send two State Tested Nursing Assistants (STNAs) home after an allegation of sexual abuse by a resident. This affected one resident (#46) of three residents reviewed for sexual abuse and had the potential to affect Resident #3. The facility census was 43. Findings included: Review of Resident #46's closed medical record revealed an admission date of 10/04/23 with diagnoses including acute cerebrovascular insufficiency, type two diabetes, essential hypertension, hyperlipidemia and male erectile dysfunction. Resident #46 left the faciity on [DATE] against medical advice. Review of Resident #46's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 10/10/23, revealed the resident had impaired cognition. Further review revealed he was dependent in toileting, personal hygiene and upper body and lower body dressing. Review of Resident #46's progress…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-14 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, resident record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure tube feeding was labeled when hung, orders for tube feeding were complete, and residents who received tube feedings were weighed appropriately. This affected three residents (#17, #47 and #48) of three residents reviewed for tube feeding. The facility census was 43. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #17's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy, moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, type two diabetes mellitus without complications, and dysphagia. Review of Resident #17's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 10/17/23, revealed she was cognitively impaired and had a feeding tube while a resident. Review of Resident #17's physician order, dated 10/13/23, identified she was to receive Diabeta Source enteral feeding every night shift at 80 milliliters (ml)/hour (hr) from 8:00 P.M. to 8:00 A.M. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-14 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, resident record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from unnecessary medication when the resident, who had pain level parameters for the administration of a controlled narcotic, did not receive the medication unless the pain level parameters were met. This affected one resident (#46) of three residents reviewed for medications. The facility census was 43. Findings included: Review of Resident #46's closed medical record revealed an admission date of 10/04/23 with diagnoses including acute cerebrovascular insufficiency, type two diabetes, essential hypertension, hyperlipidemia and male erectile dysfunction. Resident #46 left the faciity on [DATE] against medical advice. Review of Resident #46's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 10/10/23, revealed the resident had impaired cognition. Further review revealed he had not received any scheduled or as needed pain medications in the last five days. Review of Resident #46's plan of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-14 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, resident record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered by the physician and using standards of care resulting in a medication error rate greater than 5% (error rate of 14.81%). This affected one resident (#26) of two residents observed for medication administration. There were 27 opportunities for medication error and four medication errors resulting in a 14.81% medication error. The facility census was 43. Findings included: Review of Resident #26's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including pulmonary embolism, pleural effusion, dysphagia, and type two diabetes mellitus. Review of Resident #26's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 10/03/23, revealed she was cognitively intact and did not have any coughing or choking during meals, or when swallowing and did not have complaints of difficulty or pain when swallowing. Review of Resident #26's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Dakins Solution half strength used for wound care was dated when opened. This had the potential to affect three residents who had an active skin wound (#13, #24, and #26). The facility census was 43. Findings included: Observation on 11/02/23 at 10:42 A.M. of the wound supply cart revealed one bottle of one-half strength Dakins Solution which was open and almost empty and one bottle of one-half strength Dakins Solution which was open and almost full, each bottle with no documentation on the bottle to note when it was opened. Interview at the time with Registered Nurse (RN) #148 verified the bottles were not dated when opened and they should be. She verified multiple dose bottles expire 30 days after they are opened. Review of the facility policy titled, Medication Storage, Storage of Medication, undated, revealed medication and biologicals are stored properly, following manufacturer or provider pharmacy recommendations, to maintain their integrity and to support safe effective drug…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure food storage and food handling was completed in a sanitary manner, failed to ensure pest control in the kitchen, failed to ensure food service equipment was clean, and failed to maintain documentation of food temperatures prior to serving, dishwasher sanitation requirements being met, and sanitation bucket requirements being met. This had the potential to affect 42 of 43 residents receiving food from the kitchen. Facility documentation revealed Resident #42 did not receive any food by mouth. Findings included 1. Observation on 08/21/23 at 7:45 A.M. of the right reach in refrigerator revealed approximately six ounces of possibly bologna which was opened and not labeled or dated, approximately eight ounces of roast beef which was opened and not dated, and a single hot dog which was in an unsealed bag and was also not dated. Observation on 08/21/23 at 7:47 A.M. of the left reach in refrigerator revealed one half of a large bag of lettuce which was open and not dated. The lettuce in the bottom of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff wore appropriate personal protective equipment when the facility was in COVID-19 outbreak, performed hand hygiene, did not touch items with soiled gloves, and cleaned and disinfected a glucometer used by multiple residents. This affected Residents #7, #27, and #29 and had the potential to affect all 43 residents. Findings included: 1. Observation on 08/21/23 at 7:30 A.M., upon entrance into the facility, of a sign on the exterior main entrance door which informed anyone entering the building the facility was in a COVID-19 outbreak. Observation on 08/21/23 at 7:31 A.M. of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #95 and Registered Nurse (RN) # 100 sitting at the east nurses' station not wearing any masks. An interview at the time revealed the facility was in COVID-19 outbreak and per their facility policy they should be wearing N-95 masks. Neither LPN #95 of RN #100 were wearing eye protection. Observation on 08/21/23 at 7:32 A.M. of Housekeeping Aide #101 delivering meals to residents sitting in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-23 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, resident record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure pressure ulcer wound treatments were completed as ordered. This affected one resident (#37) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcer care. The facility census was 43. Findings included: Review of Resident #37's medical record revealed an initial admission date of 04/16/23 and a readmission date of 03/30/23 with diagnoses including nondisplaced intertrochanteric fracture of the right femur, moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, muscle weakness, and repeated falls. Review of Resident #37's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 07/17/23, revealed he was cognitively intact and was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. Further review revealed he had one Stage 3 pressure ulcer (full-thickness loss of skin, in which subcutaneous fat may be visible in the ulcer and granulation tissue and epibole (rolled wound edges) are often present. Slough and/or eschar may be visible but does not obscure the depth of tissue loss) which was present upon…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-23 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, resident record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure incontinence care was provided timely. This affected one resident (#27) of three residents reviewed for incontinence care. The facility census was 43. Findings included: Review of Resident #27's medical record revealed an initial admission dated of 07/05/18 and a readmission date of 12/01/20 with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis, type two diabetes, morbid obesity, and generalized muscle weakness. Review of Resident #27's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 07/04/23, revealed she was cognitively intact. The assessment indicated she needed extensive assistance of two plus persons for physical assistance with toilet use and she was frequently incontinent of bladder and always incontinent of bowel. Review of Resident #27's plan of care, dated 07/09/18, revealed she had an alteration in elimination, was frequently incontinent of bladder and occasionally incontinent of bowel. Added on 07/29/19 was that she was always incontinent of bladder.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-23 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, resident record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure they maintained a medication error rate of less than 5%. This affected three residents (#7, #20, and #29) of five residents observed for medication observation and resulted in a medication error rate of 13.95%. There was total of 43 opportunities for error during the medication administration observation and the facility had a total of six medication errors resulting in a medication error rate of 13.95%. The facility census was 43. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #20's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified fracture of the unspecified lumbar vertebra, malignant neoplasm of the unspecified site, dementia in other disease classified elsewhere, Alzheimer's disease, anxiety disorder, and essential hypertension. Review of Resident #20's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 07/09/23, revealed she was severely…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure liquid medications were stored in a way to prevent contamination. This affected one resident (#4) of five residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 43. Findings included: Observation on 08/21/23 at 12:14 P.M. as Registered Nurse (RN) #100 prepared medications for Resident #4. RN #100 poured Resident #4's liquid Carafate medication in a plastic medication cup and then sat the cup on the top of the medication cart. She then lowered herself, so she was at eye level with the medication cup to check the amount. RN #100 had poured more than what was ordered for Resident #4 into the medication cup. RN #100 then picked up the medication cup with the Carafate in it and poured some of the liquid medication back into the medication bottle the medication was originally poured from. This action resulted in contamination of the bottle of medication. Interview on 08/21/23 at 12:25 P.M. with RN #100 verified she should not have returned the liquid Carafate she over poured into…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-05-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to store and date food in a safe manner. This had the potential to affect 44 of 44 residents in the facility. Findings include: Observations on 05/09/22 from 8:25 A.M. to 8:35 A.M. revealed the following items were open and undated as to when they were opened or when they should be discarded, in the facility freezer: chicken wings, country friend steak, chicken patties, and sausage patties. Interview with Dietary Manager #138 on 05/09/22 at approximately 8:35 A.M. confirmed the items listed above were opened and undated. She stated she was not aware that items within the freezer had to be dated with either the date they were opened or the date in which they should be discarded. Review of facility Food Storage policy, dated March 2022, revealed all foods should be covered, labeled, and dated. All foods would be checked to assure that foods would be consumed by their safe used by dates or discarded.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-12 · tag F0569 — isolated
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident financial record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to adequately notify residents and/or representative of the possibility of lost Medicaid eligibility for reaching and exceeding the maximum amount within their resident funds accounts. This affected two (Resident #34 and Resident #48) of six residents whose financial records were reviewed. The census was 44. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #34's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses were quadriplegia, other recurrent depressive disorders, osteoarthritis, aphasia, epilepsy, glaucoma, and car driver injured in collision, with other type car in traffic accident. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 04/01/22, revealed Resident #34 was deemed to have a severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #34's financial records revealed the following quarterly balances: Second quarter 2021 was $5369.83, third quarter 2021 was $5402.63,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-12 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to revise Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) records when the initial PASRR document was not correct. This affected two (Resident #7 and Resident #29) of three residents reviewed for PASRR. The census was 44. Findings include: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses were end stage renal disease, muscle weakness, difficulty walking, cognitive communication deficit, major depressive disorder, schizoaffective disorder, anxiety disorder (12/13/21), muscle wasting and atrophy, dementia, hypothyroidism, hypertension, type II diabetes, chronic kidney disease (stage IV), schizophrenia, mild intellectual disabilities (10/17/20), generalized anxiety disorder (10/17/20), and unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition. Review of Resident #7's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 04/15/22, revealed Resident #7 was deemed to have a significant cognitive impairment. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-12 · tag F0646 — isolated
    Notify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to inform the state mental health agency of a significant change in Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) records. This affected two (Resident #7 and Resident #29) of three residents reviewed for PASRR. The census was 44. Findings include: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses were end stage renal disease, muscle weakness, difficulty walking, cognitive communication deficit, major depressive disorder, schizoaffective disorder, anxiety disorder (12/13/21), muscle wasting and atrophy, dementia, hypothyroidism, hypertension, type II diabetes, chronic kidney disease (stage IV), schizophrenia, mild intellectual disabilities (10/17/20), generalized anxiety disorder (10/17/20), and unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition. Review of Resident #7's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 04/15/22, revealed Resident #7 was deemed to have a significant cognitive impairment.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to identify and monitor bruises for Resident #27 in a timely manner. This affected one of four residents reviewed for non pressure skin impairment. The facility census was 45. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #27 revealed an admission date of 10/12/21 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder, osteoarthritis, malignant neoplasm, and history of thrombus. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated Resident #27 was cognitively intact and required extensive assistance of two persons for activities of daily living. Resident #27 had no skin impairments noted. Review of the plan of care dated 04/18/22 revealed Resident #27 had bruising noted throughout her skin due to bumping self against various items in her room. The interventions included to inspect skin during routine daily care, and skin assessment as ordered. Observations on 05/09/22 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-12 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a palm guard was offered and passive range of motion was completed for Resident #43. This affected one of three residents reviewed for range of motion. The facility census was 45. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #43 revealed an admission date of 06/15/19 with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease, muscle wasting and atrophy. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #43 was cognitively intact, required assistance with activities of daily living, and had impaired range of motion to one side of upper extremities. Review of the plan of care dated 03/03/22 revealed Resident #43 had a contracture of the left hand and refused therapy, the brace, a carrot, and fingernail care. Resident #43 would at times accept cleaning of the hand and put tissues in the hand. Interventions included to report pain to the nurse and therapy restorative…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-12 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to implement pharmacy medication regimen review recommendations approved by the physician in a timely manner for Resident #45. This affected one (Resident #45) of five residents whose pharmacy recommendations were reviewed. The census was 44. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses were congestive heart failure, morbid obesity, difficulty walking, sleep apnea, type II diabetes, encephalopathy, major depressive disorder, myocardial infarction, anxiety disorder, acute and chronic respiratory failure, Alzheimer's disease, anemia, osteoarthritis, atherosclerotic heart disease, hypertension, and weakness. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 02/23/22, revealed Resident #45 was deemed cognitively intact. Review of Resident #45's pharmacy recommendation, dated 12/01/21, revealed a recommendation for the physician to review the quantity and frequency of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-12 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed have proper parameters for as needed pain medications for Residents #45 and #27, and failed to provide medications as written per the physician for Resident #45. This affected two (Resident #45 and Resident #27) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The census was 44. Findings include: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses were congestive heart failure, morbid obesity, difficulty walking, sleep apnea, type II diabetes, encephalopathy, major depressive disorder, myocardial infarction, anxiety disorder, acute and chronic respiratory failure, Alzheimer's disease, anemia, osteoarthritis, atherosclerotic heart disease, hypertension, and weakness. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 02/23/22, revealed Resident #45 was deemed cognitively intact. Review of Resident #45's pharmacy recommendation, dated 12/01/21, revealed the pharmacy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2024-05-20 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — widespread
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on personnel file review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the facility implemented their policy and failed to ensure all staff were checked against the Nurse Aide Registry (NAR) for history of abuse. This had the potential to affect 42 of 42 residents at the facility. Findings included: 1. Review of personnel file for Dietary [NAME] #117 revealed no evidence he was checked against the NAR for history of abuse. 2. Review of personnel file for Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #126 revealed no evidence he was checked against the NAR for a history of abuse. Interview on 05/20/24 at 11:24 A.M. with Human Resources Manager #135 confirmed there was no evidence Dietary [NAME] #117 and Licensed Practical Nurse #126 were checked against the NAR for a history of abuse. Immediately after the facility was notified regarding the lack of all staff being checked against the NAR, Dietary [NAME] #117 and LPN #126 were checked against the NAR with no negative findings. Review of an undated policy titled Licensing Requirements revealed all required checks, including the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2024-05-20 · tag F0680 — widespread
    Ensure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of personnel files, review of the facility assessment, and interviews the facility failed to ensure the activities director was qualified. This had the potential of affect all 42 of 42 residents residing in the facility. Findings included: Review of Activity Director (AD) #142's personnel file revealed the AD was hired on 02/14/22 and signed the activity director job description on 02/09/23. The job description indicated the qualifications for the AD were to be qualified therapeutic recreation specialist and/or activities professional who was licensed by the state and is eligible for certification as recreation specialist or as an activities professional or must have two year experience in a social or recreation program within the last five years, one of which was a full-time in a patient activities program in a health care setting; or must have completed a training coarse approved by the state. There was no evidence AD #142 met the qualifications listed in the job description and regulation.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$13,627 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $13,627 — penalty dated 2024-09-18

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CONTINUING HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.1-0.1 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 51.8+0.2 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 51.8+0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.3-0.3 vs chain
The other 11 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.1★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
MILLER, MICHAELIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2026
BUNNER, MICHAELIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 05/11/2012
MALLETT, CHRISTOPHERIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2013
PARSONS, BENJAMINIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2013
SPRENGER, MARKIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2014
SPRENGER, TIMOTHYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2013
HUGHEY, TRACYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2026
KAUFFMAN, KEVINIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/13/2026
BOYER MILLER, KAYLEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/13/2026
MONTGOMERY, DAVIDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2021

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$4.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+4.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$223K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 74%Medicare 10%Other / private 16%

About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $223K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$299per resident / day
operating cost
$9,092per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$311per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365588. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next