Vista Center Of Boardman
830 Boardman Canfield Rd, Boardman, OH 44512 · For profit - Corporation · 60 certified beds · (330) 259-9393 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Mar 2024
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565, F0570)
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (55) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $45,997 in federal fines (most recent 2024-03-28)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 2.9% | 5.3% | 15.4% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.2% | 6.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.4% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 13.3% | 30.1% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.5% | 3.2% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 2.6% | 6.1% | 16.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 26.5% | 25.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 76.7% | 94.5% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.8% | 3.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 16.1% | 21.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 13.4% | 8.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.8% | 1.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 68.1% | 75.6% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 31.4% | 24.9% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 23.2% | 12.9% | 12.0% | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
45.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 41 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 63.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 22 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.40 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 68% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 45.1%CMS range 30.5–57.8 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.4%CMS range 6.0–14.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 63.6% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 40.9% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 36.4% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 2.8% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.8% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.08 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 46.9 residents a day — about 78% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.65 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.56 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.00 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.33 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.78 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.59 to 0.48 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 49% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
55 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 44 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2024-03-28 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of a facility Self-Reported Incident (SRI) and investigation, review of the facility Abuse policy and interviews with staff, resident and family, the facility failed to ensure Resident #5, who was assessed to have severe cognitive impairment and unable to provide consent, was free from resident-to-resident sexual abuse. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and the potential for psychosocial and physical harm on 03/12/24 at 3:17 P.M. for Resident #5, when Resident #42, who was cognitively intact, and had a known history of sexual behaviors towards other residents and staff prior to 03/12/24 and without planned interventions, was observed on her knees, naked from the waist down, performing oral sex on Resident #5. During an interview with Resident #5 he stated he would not be sexually interested in anyone but his wife. This affected one resident (Resident #5) of seven residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 41. On 03/20/24 at 4:30 P.M. the Administrator and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, policy review and review of the microessentiallab.com website, the facility failed to have unexpired test strips to test for proper sanitization levels at the three-sink manual dish washing area. This had the potential to affect 45 residents receiving food from the facility kitchen. There was one (Resident #19) identified by the facility as receiving nothing by mouth. The facility census was 46.Findings include:An observation during the initial tour of the kitchen on 02/17/26 at 8:15 A.M. revealed Hydrion test strips (test strips used to test for proper sanitization levels of chemicals to ensure efficacy) with an expiration date of 11/01/25 at the three-sink manual dish washing area. Dietary [NAME] #513 verified the expiration date of 11/01/25 on the Hydrion test strips at the time of the observation.A review of the undated facility policy titled; Manual Ware Washing revealed manually washed pots, pans and cooking utensils shall be adequately sanitized using a three-part process including wash, rinse, and sanitize. The policy further revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-02-19 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespreadDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain a sanitary garbage storage area. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 46.Findings include:An observation of the outside dumpster area on 02/17/26 at 8:30 A.M. revealed approximately six pairs of used vinyl medical gloves scattered on the ground around the dumpster. The lid to the dumpster was open. The side slide door was open. Dietary [NAME] #513 verified the findings at the time of the observation.A review of the facility policy titled; Garbage Removal and Dumpster, dated 12/21/21, revealed garbage can attract pests and contaminate food, equipment and utensils if not handled correctly. The policy further revealed the garbage dumpster must have a tight-fitting lid and or slide door and must be covered at all times.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, interview, review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary laundry environment to prevent the spread of germs, failed to ensure staff performed hand hygiene to prevent cross contamination of germs during medication administration for Resident #33 and Resident #21, failed to properly clean the glucometer after use to obtain Resident #39's blood sugar, failed to contain Resident #60's contaminated linen and personal protective equipment (PPE) appropriately and failed to provide Resident #1 with a sanitary area to eat his meal. This affected three (Residents #21, #33, #39) out of six residents observed for medication administration, one (Resident #39) out of two residents observed for blood glucose monitoring, one (Resident #1) out of one resident observed for dining, one (Resident #60) of one resident reviewed for isolation precautions and had the potential to affect all the residents in the facility. The facility census was 46.Findings…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-19 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure proper grooming for Resident #53 related to removal of facial hair. This affected one (Resident #53) of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The facility census was 46.Findings include:Review of Resident #53's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/20/10 and pertinent diagnoses of Multiple Sclerosis, bipolar disorder, dysphagia, muscle wasting and atrophy, vascular dementia, lack of coordination, hypertensive retinopathy, corneal deformity and congenital malformation of the eye.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Basic Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 00, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. Resident #53 was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living (ADL) and mobility and required a Hoyer (mechanical) lift for all transfers.Review of the care plan dated 12/05/25 stated Resident #53 was totally dependent with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-19 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to change nasal cannula tubing (a plastic tube with two prongs that goes into the nose to deliver oxygen) weekly for appropriate respiratory infection control. This affected one (Resident #1) of one resident reviewed for respiratory care and had the potential to affect 10 additional residents (2, #4, #13, #19, #21, #22, #23, #24, #30, and #38) identified by the facility as receiving oxygen therapy. The facility census was 46.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #1 revealed the date of admission to be 10/16/23. Significant diagnoses included acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and acute respiratory failure. Significant orders included change oxygen tubing/cannula/mask every week, every night shift, on every Saturday, dated 11/01/25, and oxygen at four liters per minute via nasal cannula as needed (PRN) to keep oxygen saturation above 90%, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were not left at the bedside for one resident (Resident #33) out of seven residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 46.Findings include:Review of the medical records for Resident #33 revealed the initial date of admission of 06/03/24 and a readmission date of 09/26/25 with a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Significant orders included Advair diskus (a prescription dry powder inhaler to manage COPD) inhalation aerosol powder 250/50, inhale one puff two times a day for COPD. There were no orders noted in the medical record for Resident #33 to have the medication left at the bedside, nor were there any orders within the medical record for Resident #33 to self-administer the Advair. There were also no orders in the medical record for Resident #33 to have an Advair aerosol inhaler.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-19 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #11's call light activation button was within reach to ensure it could be utilized. This affected one (Resident #11) of 46 residents screened for call light placement. The facility census was 46.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #11revealed the date of admission as 04/22/23. Significant diagnoses included dementia, unspecified severity without behavioral disturbance, need for assistance with personal care, and muscle weakness. There were no significant orders regarding the call light placement.Review of the care plan dated 12/16/25 revealed Resident #11 was at risk for falls. Interventions included commonly used articles within easy reach: water, call light, remote control, telephone etc.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of nine indicating Resident #11 had moderate cognitive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-19 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed ensure Resident #9's room was in good repair. This affected one (Resident #9) 46 during the initial screening and initial tour. The facility census was 46.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #9 revealed the date of admission as 02/06/25. Significant diagnoses included type one diabetes mellitus, immunodeficiency due to conditions classified elsewhere and difficulty walking. There were no significant orders regarding noncompliance for room disrepair.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 indicating Resident #9 was cognitively intact.Review of the care plan dated 12/05/26 revealed no indications that Resident #9 refused housekeeping and maintenance services.An observation on 02/18/26 at 8:35 A.M. revealed Resident #9's room was in general disrepair. The wall between the sink and bathroom had a large deep gouge just above…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-20 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to provide interventions to prevent the development of an unstageable pressure ulcer, failed to timely and accurately document the initial assessment and weekly comprehensive assessments of the pressure ulcer, failed to timely coordinate ancillary wound care services to mitigate complications related to pressure ulcers, and failed to follow proper infection control procedures during wound care. This affected one (Resident #41) of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 51. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #41 revealed an admission date of 03/09/25 and a re-entry date of 05/28/25. Resident #41 had diagnoses including unspecified dislocation of the right hip, adult failure to thrive, presence of bilateral artificial knee joints, Parkinson's disease, tachycardia, primary hypertension, osteoarthritis, and need for assistance with personal care. Review of the weekly skin assessment completed on 05/28/25 revealed Resident #41 had some bruising on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, medical record review, review of facility policy, and review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) on-line guidance for use of personal protective equipment (PPE) for care of persons with COVID-19 (the novel coronavirus, also known as severe acute respiratory syndrome two or SARS-CoV-2), the facility failed to ensure the appropriate type of transmission-based precautions for Resident #41was identifiable to staff and visitors, failed to ensure proper infection control procedures were maintained during wound care for Resident #41, and failed to ensure appropriate precautions were maintained when providing care for Resident #35. This affected two residents (Residents #35 and #41) but had the potential to affect eight residents who were identified by the facility as having wounds (Residents #21, #28, #33, #41, #42, #44, #45, and #50) and six residents who were in droplet isolation (Residents #19, #21, #26, #27, #35, and #44). The facility census was 51. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #41 revealed an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 44 citations
- Potential for harm · F2025-07-08 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure there was a Registered Nurse (RN) present in the facility eight consecutive hours seven days a week. This had potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 47.Findings include:Record review was conducted of the nursing services staffing schedule and completion of the staffing tool for the date range of 06/22/25 to 06/27/25 with Human Resources Manager (HRM) #807. The facility met or exceeded the minimum staffing requirement of 2.5 hours of direct care per resident per day, however, on 06/25/25 an RN was not on staff for eight consecutive hours that day. Interview on 07/02/24 at 3:30 P.M. with HRM #807 revealed the facility was staffed based on acuity and census numbers. There should be one nurse on each unit and one aide. The DON was full-time, and they were required to have an RN eight hours a day seven days a week. HRM #807 confirmed on 06/25/25 they did not have required RN coverage for this day.This deficiency represents non-compliance identified during investigation of Complaint Number OH00167011.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-08 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure all allegations of abuse were reported to the state agency as required. This affected four residents (#9, #10, #16, and #51) out of five residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 47.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #9 revealed an admission date of 10/09/24. Diagnoses included acute kidney failure, cognitive communication deficit, type two diabetes, adult failure to thrive, and depression.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 04/18/25 revealed the resident had impaired cognition. The resident required setup or clean up assistance for eating, supervision for oral hygiene, dressing, and bed mobility, and were dependent on staff for showers, toileting hygiene, and personal hygiene.Review of the nurse progress notes dated from 06/05/25 to 07/02/25 revealed on 06/05/25 the resident was ordered Silvadene cream (a cream used to treat burns) one percent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-07-08 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure all allegations of abuse were thoroughly investigated. This affected four residents (#9, #10, #16, and #51) out of five residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 47.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #9 revealed an admission date of 10/09/24. Diagnoses included acute kidney failure, cognitive communication deficit, type two diabetes, adult failure to thrive, and depression.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 04/18/25 revealed the resident had impaired cognition. The resident required setup or clean up assistance for eating, supervision for oral hygiene, dressing, and bed mobility, and were dependent on staff for showers, toileting hygiene, and personal hygiene.Review of the nurse progress notes dated from 06/05/25 to 07/02/25 revealed on 06/05/25 the resident was ordered Silvadene cream (a cream used to treat burns) one percent twice a day times 10…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-08 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program so that the facility was free of pests on the secured unit A. This affected 19 Residents (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #13, #14, #15, #16, #17, #18, and #19) out of 47 residents observed for physical environment. The facility census was 47. Findings include:Observations made on 07/01/25 at 9:30 A.M. and 07/02/25 at approximately 11:45 A.M. of rooms occupied by Residents' #12, #13, #16, #17 and #18 revealed there were bed bugs present in each room on the secured A unit.An interview on 07/01/25 at 3:33 P.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #811 revealed there were bed bugs found on the secured unit A approximately one week ago and the facility did not treat them until today. The staff caught a few and put them into a container and gave them to the maintenance director and the Director of Nursing (DON).An interview on 07/01/25 at 3:38 P.M. with LPN #830 revealed they caught three bed bugs the morning of 07/01/25 in the room of Resident #12 and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review,interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #8 received timely incontinence care and failed to ensure Residents #8, #22, #46 and #47 received staff assistance for showering. This affected four residents (#8, #22, #46, and #47) of five residents reviewed for assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL) needs. The facility census was 43. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #8's medical record revealed an admission date of [DATE]. Diagnoses included epilepsy, muscle weakness, abnormal posture, hemiplegia, hemiparesis right dominant side, aphasia, gastrostomy status, and pseudobulbar affect. Review of Resident #8's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severely impaired cognition. Resident #8 was dependent on staff for all Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) including eating, oral hygiene, toileting hygiene, showers, dressing, personal hygiene, incontinence care and bed mobility. Review of Resident #8's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure effective infection control techniques were practiced during incontinence care. This affected one resident (Resident #8) out of five residents reviewed for infection control. The facility census was 43. Findings include: Review of Resident #8's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/19/17. Diagnoses included epilepsy, muscle weakness, abnormal posture, hemiplegia, hemiparesis right dominant side, aphasia, gastrostomy status, and pseudobulbar affect. Review of Resident #8's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severely impaired cognition. Resident #8 was dependent on staff for all Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) including eating, oral hygiene, toileting hygiene, showers, dressing, personal hygiene, incontinence care and bed mobility. Review of Resident #8's care plan dated 03/04/25 revealed the resident was incontinent of bowel and bladder. Goals and interventions…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-10-21 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — widespreadProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and review of facility documents and policy, the facility failed to provide therapeutic activities as scheduled and on weekends and evenings to meet the needs and preferences of the resident population. This had the potential to affect all 50 residents in the facility. The facility census was 50. Findings include: Review of the facility activity calendars dated October and September 2024 for the Secured Unit A revealed no activities were scheduled after 3:00 P.M. for the month of October. Review of the September 2024 Activity Calendar for Secure Unit A revealed no activities were scheduled past 4:00 P.M. Review of the October 2024 Unit B/C activity calendar revealed no activities were scheduled after 3:00 P.M. each day except for each Wednesday an activity was scheduled for 5:00 P.M. Review of the activity department staffing schedules for September 2024 and October 2024 which listed former Activities Director (AD) #801, former Activities Aid (AA) #800 and AA #536 as the staff for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-10-21 · tag F0680 — widespreadEnsure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and review of facility policy, the facility did not ensure a qualified activity director was overseeing the activity department to ensure therapeutic activities were being provided to the residents. This affected all 50 residents living in the facility. The facility census was 50. Findings include: Review of the facility job description for the Activity Director (AD) revealed they must be a qualified therapeutic recreation specialist or an activities professional who was licensed by the state and was eligible for certification as recreation specialist or as an activity professional. Review of the personnel file for the former AD #801 revealed a date of hire of 05/16/23 as the Activities Director and last day worked was 09/16/24. No certification from the Activity Directors Network was available in the file. Interview on 10/16/24 at 2:31 P.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed there was no Activity Director for the past month. The facility was utilizing the [NAME]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-10-21 · tag F0730 — widespreadObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure each state tested nurse aide (STNA) received no less than twelve hours of annual in-service education. This had potential to affect all residents in the facility. The facility census was 50. Findings included: Review of personnel file for STNA #551 revealed her hire date was 02/02/22 and her training record in her file labeled, Course Status Report with Totals printed on 10/16/24 revealed STNA #551 had completed one training on 06/04/24 that was on corporate compliance. The training did not include how long the training was as at the bottom of the report it revealed STNA #551 had zero hours of training out of 20.83 assigned. The training record revealed she was assigned a variety of trainings including abuse, dementia care, infection control, fall management, fire safety, resident rights, and elopement prevention but these training were marked on the sheet as not attempted. Interview on 10/17/24 at 12:37 P.M. with Human Resource Manager #525 verified STNA #551 had not completed the required annual training and the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-10-21 · tag F0801 — widespreadEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility did not ensure the dietary manager was qualified to oversee dietary service operations. This had the potential to affect all 50 residents receiving meals from the kitchen, as the facility did not identify any residents who did not eat by mouth (NPO). The facility census was 50. Findings include: Review of Dietary Manager ( DM) #511's employee file revealed no formal certified dietary manager training nor certificate of completion for the SERV Safe course. Interview on 10/16/24 at 11:32 A.M. with DM #511 revealed there was not a full-time dietitian in the facility. A company called Dietary Solution provided the menu but no kitchen oversight. DM #511 stated she had not passed the SERV Safe exam and was not certified as a dietary manager. DM #511 stated she was a cook for the facility starting January 2024 then was promoted in May 2024 to the DM position and had no additional formal training to qualify as the DM. Interview on 10/21/24 at 8:42 A.M. with Dietary Solution [NAME] President of Operations #571 confirmed a registered dietitian…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-10-21 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespreadEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure palatable food was served to the residents. This had the potential to effect 50 residents who received a meals from the facility kitchen. The facility identified there were no residents who did not eat by mouth (NPO). The facility census was 50. Findings include: Interview on 10/15/24 at 9:12 A.M. with Resident #15 revealed if his tray was served last from the cart, his food was often cold which happened quite a bit. He revealed the food was just not very nourishing and he questioned, have you ever had to eat cold food? Resident #15 stated because the hot food was often served cold to him the food was not good. Interview on 10/15/24 at 11:43 A.M. Resident #196 stated the food did not taste good and the food was cold. Resident #196 had his family bring in outside food because he did not like the quality of the facility food. An observation was conducted on 10/16/24 from 11:43 A.M. to 12:51 P.M. with Dietary Manager ( DM) #511 of the lunch tray line and a test tray. The lunch menu consisted of sauce with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and policy review, the facility did not ensure food was stored in a manner to prevent contamination and/or food borne illness. The facility also did not ensure the kitchen was maintained in a sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect 50 residents. There were no residents identified by the facility as eating nothing by mouth (NPO). The facility census was 50. Findings include: On 10/15/24 at 8:32 A.M. an initial tour of the kitchen revealed dried noodles and chicken sitting the empty wash bay of the three bay sink. Dietary manager (DM) #511 verified the dried noodles and chicken in this sink at the time of the observation. DM #511 stated the sink was to be cleaned every night and as needed. The initial tour also revealed noodles and white beans in the drain of the dishwasher. DM #511 verified the noodles and white beans in the dishwasher drain. Observation of the dry storage area revealed a dented 113 ounce can of Fancy Midwest Chili Sauce and a dented six-pound 11 ounce can of Manwich. There was a 10-pound bag of pancake mix opened and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-10-21 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespreadAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of the administrator job description and interview the facility failed to be administered in a manner that enabled it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident which included failure to ensure the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee meetings were held to include the medical director or designee and evidence of meetings as required were maintained, failure to ensure a qualified director of activities was employed in the facility and failure to ensure a therapeutic activities program was being developed and implemented for the residents. This had the potential to affect all 50 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of the job description for the facility Administrator, signed on 04/01/24 by the Administrator, revealed the primary purpose of the Administrator was to direct the day-to-day functions of the facility in accordance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-10-21 · tag F0868 — widespreadHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure quarterly Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI)meetings were conducted and failed to have the designated medical director participate in the QAPI meetings. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 50. Findings include: Review of the attendance signature sheets for the QAPI members revealed Medical Director #702 was not listed as present during the meetings on 04/30/24, 05/21/24, 06/03/24, 07/17/24, 08/21/24, and 09/20/24. There was also no evidence QAPI meetings were held prior to April 2024. Interview on 10/21/24 at 1:57 P.M. with the Administrator confirmed there was no evidence of the medical director's or designee's attendance at the QAPI meetings as required, and the Administrator stated she could not provide any evidence of QAPI meetings prior to April 2024 when she took over as Administrator at the facility.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, review of Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) Quality, Safety, and Oversight (QSO) Memo 24-08-NH, staff interview, and policy review , the facility failed to ensure enhanced barriers precautions (EBP) were followed for one resident (Resident #194) of nine residents who were identified by the facility as being on EBP (Residents #6, #12, #21, #26, #34, #35, #193, #194, and #196). The facility also failed to ensure annual tuberculosis (TB) signs and symptoms for employes were completed per the TB risk assessment and policy. This had the potential to affect all 50 residents in the facility. The facility census was 50. Findings include: 1. A review of medical records for Resident #194 revealed an admission date of 10/08/24 with diagnoses included cerebral infarction with hemiplegia and hemiparesis affecting the right dominant side, need for assistance with personal care, and ulcerative colitis. Review of physician orders for October 2024 included check placement of gastric…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-21 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and review of facility policy the facility did not ensure a safe, functional and comfortable environment for all residents. This had the potential to affect all 50 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Observation on 10/21/24 from 11:15 A.M. to 11:27 A.M. with Maintenance Director( MD) #526 revealed the following which were verified by MD #526 at the time of the observation: • Resident #148's side rail was breaking off the bed and able to be pulled off the side of the bed. • A corroded hole in the ceiling leading into the 100 hall was found to be open. MD #526 indicated that the hole was caused by water leaking from the roof and reported that he did not have the necessary materials to repair it. The hole was large enough to allow potential pests such as insects or rodents to enter the hallway in resident occupied areas. • The 100 hall contained a hole measuring 4.5 inches across and 2.5 inches wide with sharp edges exposed. The hole was at the level where a resident passing by could make bodily contact with the sharp edges. MD #526…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-21 · tag F0570 — patternAssure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the resident funds accounts, review of the surety bond, interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to provide a surety bond large enough to cover the total amount of money in all resident personal funds accounts. This had the potential to affect 20 residents identified as having resident fund accounts (Residents #3, # 4, #5, #7, #9, #10, #11, #12, #13, #20, #21, #23, #25, #26, #27, #31, #32, #33, #38, and #39). The facility census was 50. Findings include: A review of resident fund account for the facility dated 10/17/24 revealed a total amount of 98,931.82 dollars. A review of resident fund accounts revealed Resident #26 made a deposit of 101,801.07 dollars on 06/04/24. Resident #26 had a total of 91,442.68 dollars in the resident fund account on 10/17/24. A review of an email dated 09/26/24 from Business Office Manager (BOM) #533 revealed the active surety bond did not cover the amount in resident fund accounts. A review of the document by Merchants Bonding Company, bond number OH5329260, revealed an effective date of 08/01/24. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-21 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident #31's advance directives in the medical record and physician orders matched. The facility also failed to ensure the nurse had knowledge of which code status to follow. This affected one resident (#31) out of four residents reviewed for advance directives and had the potential to affect all 50 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #31 revealed an admission date of [DATE] with diagnoses including obstructive pulmonary disease with exacerbation, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, seizure disorder, dementia, and schizophrenia. Review of the undated Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) Comfort Care form completed by Nurse Practitioner #701 revealed Resident #31 code status was DNR Comfort Care. This form was in the miscellaneous section of Resident #31's electronic medical record. Review of the nursing note dated [DATE] at 10:30 A.M. authored by Former…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, review of the Ohio Department of Health Gateway, and review of the facility abuse policy, the facility failed to report an allegation of resident-to-resident abuse within 24 hours to the state agency after Resident #38 threw a cup of hot coffee on Resident #144 . This affected one Resident (#144) out of one resident reviewed for abuse and had the potential to affect all 50 residents residing in the facility. Findings included: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #38 revealed an admission date of 07/08/24 and his diagnoses included psychosis, dementia, and malignant neoplasm of colon. Review of the care plan dated 07/26/24 revealed Resident #38 had a behavior problem related to verbal outbursts, exit seeking, and history of physical aggression. Resident #38's wife had an order of protection in place through the sheriff's office due to physical aggression. Interventions included administering medication per order, intervening and redirecting the resident as needed,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure accurate care plans were in place for Residents #19 and #148. This affected two residents (#19 and #148) of four residents who were reviewed for care plans. This had the potential to affect all 50 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #19 revealed an admission date of 04/10/23 with diagnoses including dementia with behavioral disturbances, adult failure to thrive, and other signs and symptoms involving cognitive function. Significant orders included Depakote sprinkles oral capsule delayed releases (used to treat manic or mixed episodes associated with bipolar disorder) 125 milligrams (mg), 125 mg two times daily for behaviors and 250mg daily at bedtime for behaviors. There was also an order stating Do Not Resuscitate Comfort Care Arrest (DNRCCA) meaning life saving measures until the heart stops beating. Review of the care plan dated 09/01/24 revealed Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure timely and accurate care plans for Residents #34 and #35. This affected two residents (#34 and #35) of four residents who were reviewed for care plans. This had the potential to affect all 50 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #34 revealed an admission date of 05/08/24 with diagnoses including atrial fibrillation, multiple sclerosis (MS), diabetes mellitus type two, and morbid obesity. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #34 was cognitively intact. Review of the care conferences revealed Resident #34 had an admission care conference on 05/13/24. The next documented care conference was dated 06/03/24. At that meeting, Resident #34 had a change in discharge plans from short-term care to long-term care placement. Review of the care plan dated 08/11/24 revealed Resident #34 was to be discharged home. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to provide oral care for Resident #194, who had hemiplegia and hemiparesis affecting the right dominant side and required supervision or touching assistance for oral hygiene. This affected one resident (#194) of one resident reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) care and had the potential to affect all residents except seven residents (#4, #10, #12, #23, #32, #33, and #36) identified by the facility as independent with oral care. The facility census was 50. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #194 revealed an admission date of 10/08/24 with diagnoses including cerebral infarction with hemiplegia and hemiparesis affecting the right dominant side, need for assistance with personal care, and ulcerative colitis. Resident #194 had a physician's order to provide oral care every shift. Review of the care plan dated 10/08/24 revealed Resident #194 required assistance with ADL care related to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-21 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. A review of medical records for Resident #195 revealed an admission date of 10/01/24. Significant diagnoses included mixed simple and mucopurulent chronic bronchitis and heart failure. Significant orders included bumex (a water pill for fluid retention) 0.5 milligrams, give one tablet by mouth in the morning for fluid retention for seven days dated 10/07/24 and weekly weights times four weeks then monthly. Review of the admission MDS 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #195 was cognitively intact. A review of weights revealed on 10/02/24 Resident #195 weighed 174.5 pounds. On 10/03/24 Resident #195 weighed 201.6 pounds. There was no reweigh noted. On 10/08/24 Resident #195 weighed 187.0 pounds. There was no reweigh noted. On 10/15/24 Resident #195 weighed 185 pounds. Review of the dietary assessment note dated10/07/24 revealed on 10/03/24 Resident #195 weighed 201.6 by standing scale. The assessment also revealed this was a gain of five percent or more in the last month without being on a weight…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-21 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident #15 received culturally competent trauma-informed care including the identification of triggers, and interventions to assist with the management to eliminate or mitigate re-traumatization of the resident. This affected one resident (#15) out of two residents reviewed for Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). The facility census was 50. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #15 revealed an admission date of 07/30/24 with diagnoses including PTSD, bipolar disorder, major depression with severe psychotic symptoms, and hypertension. Review of admission Packet- V12 dated 07/30/24 revealed under trauma, Resident #15 was asked if he experienced trauma in his life, and he answered yes. The assessment asked if he had any triggers that reminded him of the trauma, and he answered yes. In the additional comments section, it had listed PTSD/ Vietnam war. Review of the undated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-21 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. A review of medical records for Resident #19 revealed an admission date of 04/10/23 with diagnoses including dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere unspecified severity with other behavioral disturbances, adult failure to thrive and other signs and symptoms involving cognitive function. Physician orders included Depakote sprinkles oral capsule delayed releases 125 milligrams (mg), give 125 mg two times daily for behaviors and 250 mg daily at bedtime for behaviors. There were no orders for depakote levels to be drawn. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #19 had a moderate cognitive deficit. The MDS also revealed verbal behaviors occurring one to three days in the seven day look back period. Review of the care plan dated 09/01/24 revealed Resident #19 had a behavior problem related to profanity, refusals of care and yelling out. Interventions included administer medication as ordered and monitor for effectiveness of medication and potential side…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-03-28 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, review of a Self-Reported incident and investigation, review of a soft file, review of resident council minutes, and interview, the facility failed to ensure sufficient staff to provide supervision and timely care. This had the potential to affect all 41 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of resident council meeting minutes on 01/22/24 revealed seven residents (Residents #25, #29, #35, #36, #37, #38, and #39) attended. A concern was addressed regarding a resident or residents believed there should be an extra nursing assistant/floater on the floor for help. The facility's response by the Director of Nursing and the Administrator dated 02/20/24 indicated staffing was reviewed daily. The facility assessment was also reviewed and the facility continued to staff appropriately throughout the building. During an interview on 03/25/24 at 4:17 P.M., the Administrator indicated although the staffing numbers were reviewed, residents were not interviewed further to determine why they believed more staff was needed. The DON was present and provided no other…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-28 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of resident council meeting minutes and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident concerns were addressed. This affected Residents #25, #29, #35, #36, #37, #38, #39, #46 and #47, residents of the B and C hall. The facility identified 25 residents who resided on the B and C halls. The facility census was 41. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident Council Minutes dated 12/20/23 revealed six residents (Residents #29, #36, #38, #39, #46 and #47) attended the meeting. The minutes indicated residents (did not indicate if all residents) reported floors in rooms needed more focus. A resident council concern form indicated the response to the concern was that there was a new maintenance director who was supposed to be starting in December 2023. The form was signed as the issue being resolved and was dated on 12/20/23 as being reviewed by Admissions Director #109 and Maintenance Director #138. No other resolution or remedy was noted. During an interview on 03/25/24 at 4:17 P.M., the Administrator stated, pending the new maintenance director being hired, there was no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-28 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interview, the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary environment. This affected Residents #5, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #13, #14 and #15 whose rooms were randomly viewed for cleanliness. The census was 41. Findings include: During random observations of residents' rooms and bathrooms on the secure unit, Maintenance Director/Housekeeping Supervisor #138 verified the following: 1. The bathroom between Resident #11 and #12 and the adjoining unoccupied room had a dirty floor. Multiple tile had yellow and brown stains. 2. Resident #14 and #15's room had stained floor tile around the edge of the room and closet. The bathroom they shared with Resident #13 had stained floor tiles especially around the toilet and edges of the room. 3. Resident #9's bathroom shared with an unoccupied room had tiles that were stained. Maintenance Director #138 stated the tile would likely need replaced. 4. Resident #10's floor was dirty under the bed. Tiles were stained with the heavier stains around/under the heater. The bathroom tile between Resident #10 and Resident #8's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-28 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure allegations of sexual abuse were reported to the State Survey agency. This affected two (Residents #15 and #43) of seven residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 41. Findings include: Review of Resident #15's medical record revealed diagnoses including severe major depressive disorder with psychotic symptoms, cognitive communication deficit and generalized muscle weakness. A history and physical dated 08/22/23 indicated Resident #15 was a poor historian. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #15 was moderately cognitively impaired (with a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 10 out of possible 15). Nurse Practitioner (NP) #154 documented on 03/05/24 she was notified by nursing that Resident #15 inappropriately touched a female resident. An ongoing investigation was occurring. During an interview on 03/19/24 at 8:13 A.M., the Administrator identified the female resident referred to in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-28 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to revise a care plan to include and address sexually inappropriate behaviors. This affected one (Resident #15) of seven residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 41. Findings include: Review of Resident #15's medical record revealed diagnoses including severe major depressive disorder with psychotic symptoms, cognitive communication deficit and generalized muscle weakness. A history and physical dated 08/22/23 indicated Resident #15 was a poor historian. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #15 was moderately cognitively impaired. Nurse Practitioner (NP) #154 documented on 03/05/24 she was notified by nursing that Resident #15 inappropriately touched a female resident. An ongoing investigation was occurring. There was no indication Resident #15's plan of care was updated regarding inappropriate sexual behaviors or interventions to prevent such behavior in the future. During an interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to address recommendations for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis with the attending physician or Nurse Practitioner (NP) for one (Resident #21) of three residents reviewed for implementation of consultant recommendations/orders. The facility census was 41. Findings include: Review of Resident #21's medical record revealed diagnoses including fracture of the right lower leg, diabetes mellitus, generalized muscle weakness, difficulty walking, chronic pain, and osteoarthritis. Review of documentation from an orthopedic appointment dated 03/13/24 indicated Resident #21 had non-weight bearing on the right lower extremity. Instructions included due to non-weight bearing status on the right lower extremity, a recommendation was made for 325 milligrams of aspirin to be administered twice a day. Review of progress notes and orders revealed no evidence the recommendation was discussed with the attending physician or provided to the physician/nurse practitioner. Further review of the medical record revealed the resident did…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-28 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, medical record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure oxygen was provided in accordance with physician orders. This affected one (Resident #39) of three residents reviewed for oxygen use. The facility census was 41. Findings include: Review of Resident #39's medical record revealed diagnoses including heart failure, generalized anxiety disorder, and cognitive communication deficit. Review of physician orders revealed on 11/27/23 an order was written to initiate oxygen at two liters per minute via nasal cannula to maintain an oxygen saturation of 92% every shift and wean as tolerated. On 03/18/24 at 12:04 P.M., Resident #39 was observed sitting in the wheelchair in her room with oxygen running via concentrator set at four liters per minute (LPM). On 03/18/24 at 12:18 P.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #115 verified Resident #39's oxygen concentrator was set at 4 LPM. LPN #115 stated Resident #39's oxygen saturations had been dropping two to four weeks prior to the survey and the oxygen was increased. LPN #115 stated oxygen…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-28 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of a soft file, and interview the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records. This affected three (Residents #21, #42, and #43) of 15 residents reviewed. The census was 41. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #15's medical record revealed diagnoses including severe major depressive disorder with psychotic symptoms, cognitive communication deficit and generalized muscle weakness. A history and physical dated 08/22/23 indicated Resident #15 was a poor historian. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #15 was moderately cognitively impaired. Nurse Practitioner (NP) #154 documented on 03/05/24 she was notified by nursing that Resident #15 inappropriately touched a female resident. An ongoing investigation was occurring. During an interview on 03/19/24 at 8:13 A.M., the Administrator identified the female resident referred to in the progress note for Resident #15 on 03/05/24 as Resident #43. When asked if the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-09-13 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure clean and sanitary condition of the ice machine located downstairs by the elevator which provided ice for resident consumption. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility excluding Resident #12, #22 and #39 who the facility identified as receiving nothing by mouth. The facility census was 50. Findings include: Observation made on 09/11/23 at 12:42 P.M. with Laundry Aide (LA) #802 of the ice machine located downstairs by the elevator revealed on the ice guard inside of the ice machine there was a moderate and thick build-up of pink biofilm containing specks of a black, mold-like substance . Laundry Aide (LA) #802 confirmed the finding during the observation. Interview on 09/11/23 at 1:00 P.M. with the Maintenance Director (MD) #804 revealed the ice machine was cleaned every three months and was scheduled to be cleaned at the end of September. MD #804 confirmed there was a visible black mold-like substance and a thick, pink biofilm present inside the ice machine and this ice machine provided ice to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-13 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain effective pest control on the C-unit for Resident #5, #13, #15, #25, #29, #31, #44, #46 and #49 and failed to maintain effective pest control on the secured unit in common areas which had the potential to affect all 15 residents (#2, #6, #10, #11, #18, #19, #20, #25, #26, #33, #36, #40, #45, #48 and #51) residing on the secured unit. This affected 24 residents of 50 residents living in the facility. The facility census was 50. Findings include: Observations made throughout the survey on 09/11/23 through 09/13/23 of the general facility environment including resident rooms and common areas on all units revealed multiple fruit flies present in resident rooms on the C-unit for Resident #5, #13, #15, #25, #29, #31, #44, #46 and #49. The secured unit common area also had evidence of multiple, live fruit flies buzzing around in the common area. Interview conducted on 09/11/23 at 1:00 P.M. wth the Maintenance Director (MD) #804 and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #805 revealed fruit flies have been an issue in the facility,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-09-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure food was labeled and dated appropriately. This had the potential to affect 46 residents who received meals from the kitchen. The facility identified two (Residents #13 and #250) who received nothing by mouth. The facility census was 48. Findings include: Observation on 09/12/22 at 8:19 A.M. of the kitchen revealed a freezer which contained a bag of frozen rolls, identified by the Dietary Manager (DM) #517 as cinnamon rolls opened and undated, one pie opened and undated, a bag identified by DM #517 as biscuits opened and undated, a half full box of chocolate magic cups opened and undated, three bags of pureed cinnamon French toast opened and undated, two bags of pureed waffles opened and undated, one piece of fish, as identified as by the DM #517 in a Ziploc bag, opened and undated, a half bag of chopped spinach opened and undated, a bag identified as sweet potato fries by the DM #517 dated 05/28/22, a bag of cheddar cheese sauce expired 04/22, four bags of French toast opened and undated.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-09-15 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) was given to two Residents (#255 and #256) upon discontinuation of skilled services and failed to ensure a Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice (SNF ABN) form and was given to three Residents (#12, #255 and #256) upon the discontinuation of skilled services. This affected three (Resident's #12, #255 and #256) of three residents reviewed for proper notices of non-coverage. The facility census was 48. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #12 revealed an admission date of 03/02/22. Resident #12 was given a NOMNC on 04/22/22 which stated skilled services would be discontinued on 04/27/22. Review of census records revealed Resident #12 remained in the facility. Further review of the medical record revealed Resident #12 did not receive a SNF ABN as required. Review of the medical record for Resident #255 revealed an admission date of 06/02/22. Resident #255 did not receive a NOMNC or SNF ABN as required. Resident #255 was discharged…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-09-15 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Ombudsman was notified Resident #38 was transferred to the hospital. This affected one (Resident #38) of three residents reviewed for hospitalizations. The facility census was 48. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #38 revealed an admission date of 06/22/22. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction, hyperkalemia, chronic kidney disease, encephalopathy, seizures, and anemia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #38 had impaired cognition. He required extensive assistance in most areas of activities of daily living (ADL). Review of a progress noted dated 06/21/22 revealed Resident #38 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] and admitted with a diagnosis of pancreatitis. Review of a progress note dated 07/18/22 revealed Resident #38 was lethargic and had a high potassium level. The physician was contacted and ordered the resident be sent to the Emergency Department (ED) for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-09-15 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to provide medication administration according to facility policy for Resident #40. This affected one (Resident #40) of four residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 48. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #40 revealed an admission date of 08/17/22. Diagnoses included encounter for other orthopedic aftercare, asthma, and type two diabetes mellitus. Review of the physician's order dated 08/18/22 for Resident #40 revealed azelastine HCL 137 micrograms (mcg)/spray (steroid nasal spray) one spray in both nostrils two times a day for allergies. Review of the physician's order dated 08/22/22 for Resident #40 revealed proair HFA aerosol solution 108 mcg/act (emergency inhaler) two puffs inhale four times a day for shortness of breath and wheezing. The order also for the same date revealed fluticasone propionate suspension 50 mcg/act (inhaler) two sprays in each nostril…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure Resident #16 received interventions after three days of no bowel movement per the bowel protocol and failed to ensure neurological (neuro) checks were completed for Resident #39 after an unwitnessed fall. This affected one of one resident (Resident #39) reviewed for falls and one (Resident #16) of five residents (Residents #10, #14, #16, #28, #39) reviewed for unnecessary medication. The census was 48. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #16 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy, type II diabetes, osteomyelitis of vertebra, morbid obesity, chronic respiratory failure, malnutrition, altered mental state, discitis lumbar sacral region, acquired absence of toes, neuropathy, and heart failure. Medications included Percocet 10-325 milligrams (mg) (opioid pain medication) every eight hours as needed for pain. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Summary (MDS)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-09-15 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive and individualized range of motion treatment and services for Resident #28 to address contractures/limitations in range of motion to the resident's upper left hand. This affected one (Resident #28) of five residents reviewed for range of motion. The facility census was 48. Findings include: Observation on 09/12/22 at 2:35 P.M. of Resident #28 revealed a contracture (hardened muscles or tissue, leading to deformity and rigidity of joints) to his left hand. Interview with Resident #28 at the time of the observation revealed he could not move his hand and would like to see a hand doctor. Review of the medical record for Resident #28 revealed an admission date of 09/10/20. Diagnoses included diabetes, cerebral infarction, muscle atrophy, transient ischemic attack (TIA), hypoglycemia, and anemia. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-09-15 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to have a physician acknowledge pharmacy recommendations for Residents #10, #14 and #39. This affected three (Residents #10, #14 and #39) of four residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 48. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #10 an admission date of 03/27/20. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, and morbid obesity. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #10 had intact cognition. Resident #10 was independent for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene; and independent with set-up help only for eating. Resident #10 was always continent of bowel and bladder. Review of the pharmacy recommendations for Resident #10 dated 07/31/22 and 08/05/22 revealed Resident #10 had been prescribed Ativan (antianxiety medication) 1 milligram (mg) three times a daily which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-09-15 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to provide evidence Resident #10 had an attempted or actual gradual dose reduction of antianxiety medication. This affected one (Resident #10) of four residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 48. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #10 had an admission date of 03/27/20. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, and morbid obesity. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #10 had intact cognition. Resident #10 was independent with no help for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene; and independent with set-up help only for eating. Resident #10 was always continent of bowel and bladder. Review of pharmacy recommendations for Resident #10 dated 07/31/22 and 08/05/22 revealed she had been prescribed Ativan (antianxiety medication) 1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to have a physician's order for Resident #40's emergency inhalation medications to be kept at the bedside. This affected one (Resident #40) of four residents reviewed for medication storage. The facility census was 48. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #40 revealed an admission date of 08/17/22. Diagnoses included encounter for other orthopedic aftercare, asthma, and type two diabetes mellitus. Review of the physician's order dated 08/18/22 for Resident #40 revealed azelastine HCL 137 micrograms (mcg)/spray (steroid nasal spray) one spray in both nostrils two times a day for allergies. Review of the physician's order dated 08/22/22 for Resident #40 revealed ProAir HFA aerosol solution 108 mcg/act (emergency inhaler) two puffs inhale four times a day for shortness of breath and wheezing. The order also for the same date revealed fluticasone propionate suspension 50 mcg/act (inhaler) two sprays…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$45,997 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $45,997 — penalty dated 2024-03-28
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to CONTINUING HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.1 | -1.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 1.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 1.8 | +1.2 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 4.3 | -1.3 vs chain |
The other 11 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.1★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| BUNNER, MICHAEL | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/01/2016 |
| MALLETT, CHRISTOPHER | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/01/2016 |
| PARSONS, BENJAMIN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/01/2016 |
| SPRENGER, MARK | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/01/2016 |
| SPRENGER, TIMOTHY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/01/2016 |
| HUGHEY, TRACY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2026 |
| KAUFFMAN, KEVIN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/01/2024 |
| MILLER, MICHAEL | Individual | TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2026 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $280K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OH
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365760. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-19, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.