No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Vista Center At The Ridge

3379 Main Street, Mineral Ridge, OH 44440 · For profit - Corporation · 155 certified beds · (330) 652-9901 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (330) 652-9901 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0607, F0610) — most recent Jan 2023Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)2 actual-harm citations
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (34) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1360 N Canfield Niles Rd · (330) 652-6556 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
501 Robbins Ave · (330) 652-1435 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
560 Carson Salt Springs Rd · (330) 652-7806 · Call to confirm hours
Park
3784 Main St · (330) 652-6326 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased4.8%5.3%15.4%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.7%6.2%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.2%0.2%0.9%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.6%0.4%2.0%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms6.7%30.1%6.5%typical
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.7%3.2%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened3.8%6.1%16.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication20.3%25.5%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine84.1%94.5%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.1%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control18.0%21.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table15.1%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.6%1.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine62.0%75.6%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission16.3%24.9%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit14.1%12.9%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.511.731.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.131.801.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

42.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 73 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

42.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
29.8%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.28U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.12hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.13hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 29.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 47 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 43% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF42.8%CMS range 34.4–55.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.6%CMS range 6.1–14.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge29.8%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge40.4%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge21.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified93.8%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened4.6%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.8%CMS range 4.6–13.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.011.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.44
RN hours/ resident / day
0.75
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.79
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.98
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.29
RN hoursweekends
43.4%
Total nursing turnover
42.1%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 155 beds and averages 146.8 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.98 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.44 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.79 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.70 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.10 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.50 to 0.29 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 43% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

14
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-02-06)
11
at the previous standard inspection (2023-01-12)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

34 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-01-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed medical record review, hospital record review, review of facility policy and interview the facility failed to ensure effective and timely ongoing monitoring and assessments were completed for a non-pressure related skin impairment to Resident #132's right forearm. Actual Harm occurred on 01/02/24 at 1:14 P.M. when Registered Nurse (RN) #612 identified a previous open area to Resident #132's right forearm contained thick black necrotic eschar (dead tissue) and was significantly larger in size measuring 12 centimeters (cm) in length by ten cm width. The resident was transferred to the hospital where she required surgical debridement to the fascia (layer of connective tissue that surrounds the cells, nerves, joints, and tendons) and treatment for a venous thrombosis (blood clot) at the lateral ventral aspect of the arm. Prior to 01/02/24 there was no previous documentation Resident #132's right forearm open area was being assessed/monitored and/or measured except on the admission assessment dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2024-01-30 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, facility policy review and interview, the facility failed to ensure timely assessments were completed and adequate interventions were implemented to prevent the development of pressure ulcers for Resident #79 and Resident #124. Actual Harm occurred on 11/30/23 (six days after admission) when Resident #79, who was cognitively impaired and required total dependence from staff for activities of daily living (ADL) including bed mobility, toileting, and transfers was found to have a Stage III (full thickness loss of skin where adipose (fat) was visible in the ulcer) pressure ulcer to her right buttock. The pressure ulcer was assessed to deteriorate to an unstageable pressure ulcer on 12/07/23. Actual Harm occurred on 12/14/23 when Resident #124, who was a paraplegic and was dependent on staff assistance with bed mobility and transfers was found to have a Stage III pressure ulcer to his right buttock extending to his sacral area. There was no evidence adequate interventions and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #143's Advance Directive (legal document outlining your future medical care in the event you cannot communicate them yourself) code status was accurate. This affected one resident (#143) of three residents reviewed for code status and had the potential to affect 52 residents (#4, #5, #8, #11, #12, #15, #16, #27, #29, #30, #32, #34, #36, #37, #46, #47, #54, #57, #63, #65, #68, #70, #73, #76, #77, #87, #89, #90, #91, #92, #96, #99, #100, #101, #103, #104, #105, #109, #110, #111, #112, #113, #114, #118, #119, #121, #122, #128, #133, #134, #138 and #163) with an Advance Directive. The facility census was 143. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #143 revealed an admission date of [DATE] and a discharge date of [DATE]. Diagnoses included diabetes, dementia, muscle weakness, depression, and breast cancer.Review of the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) evaluation dated [DATE] revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-09-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, review of the housekeeping cleaning schedule, interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanity environment for residents. This affected six (Residents #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, and #11) of 21 residents residing on the 400 unit and had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 144. Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #1 revealed an admission date of 12/18/18. Diagnoses included schizophrenia and unspecified intellectual disabilities. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 had impaired cognition. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #2 revealed an admission date of 10/07/21. Diagnoses included schizophrenia and catatonic disorder. Review of the quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #2 had impaired cognition. 3. Review of the medical record for Resident #3 revealed an admission date of 04/03/14.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-28 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #128 was provided a 30-day notice at discharge and appropriate discharge planning to secure safe discharge placement. This finding affected one (Resident #128) of three residents reviewed for discharge planning. Findings include: Review of submitted concerns to the state agency on 04/08/25 revealed the facility attempted to send Resident #128 to a group home, but the resident did not want to live in the area due to distance from friends and local stores. The facility did not offer any other places for the resident to be discharge to. Resident #128 was approached about being discharged on 04/03/25 and he reported to the facility he did not have anywhere to go. Resident #128 was discharged from the facility on 04/04/25 with no place to go other than a hotel. Resident #128 was discharged to a hotel and was not provided a 30-day notice. Review of Resident #128's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] and discharged on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-02-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure food was labeled and dated appropriately. This had the potential to affect 143 of 144 residents who received meals from the facility kitchen. The facility identified one resident (#50) who received no food by mouth. The facility census was 144. Findings include: Observations during of the main initial kitchen tour conducted on 02/03/25 between 8:27 A.M. and 9:10 A.M. with [NAME] #1238 revealed the following concerns: • The main walk-in refrigerator contained one pork loin in a metal container that was undated and unlabeled. • The reach in refrigerator revealed one undated metal container of 12 quartered hard-boiled eggs which was undated and unlabeled, one metal container of ham which was undated and unlabeled, one Chef salad that was undated, and one metal container of a gelatinous brown-green substance which [NAME] #1238 could not identify, which was unlabeled and undated. Interview on 02/03/25 at 8:50 A.M. with [NAME] #1238 verified all the above items were unlabeled and undated and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-02-06 · tag F0887 — widespread
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of personnel records and interview the facility failed to maintain documentation the COVID-19 vaccine was offered to the staff, and the staff were provided education regarding the benefits and risks associated with COVID-19 vaccine annually. This had the potential to affect all 144 residents in the facility. Findings include: A review of Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1234's, CNA #1274's, CNA #1226's, CNA #1315's and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1231's personnel records revealed there was no documentation the facility had provided education and/or offered the information/consent regarding the COVID-19 vaccine. An interview with Infection Control Preventionist (ICP) #1240 on 02/06/25 at 10:50 A.M. stated she did not file the employee's consent and/or education regarding the COVID-19 vaccine in the employees' personnel files. ICP #1240 stated the Human Resources Manager (HRM) filed the consents and education in the employees' personnel files. An interview with the HRM #1267 on 02/06/25 at 11:00 A.M. verified the facility failed to maintain documentation the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, review of the centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff donned the appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) when providing direct care to Resident #13, Resident #16, Resident #36, Resident #50 and Resident #119. This affected five residents (#13, #16, #36, #50, and #119) out of five residents reviewed for enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) and/or transmission based precautions (TBP) and had the potential to affect and additional 19 residents (#4, #7, #15, #23, #31, #33, #60, #81, #91, #93, #96, #106, #111, #114, #125, #127, #135, #196, and #444) identified by the facility with orders for EBP. The facility census was 144. Findings include: 1. Resident #50 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including respiratory failure, senile degeneration of the brain, gastronomy and colostomy status, diabetes mellitus, depression, bone density disorder, anxiety, gastroesophageal reflux…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-06 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to adequately clean and maintain Resident #63's room, Resident #23's wheelchair, the laundry room and the resident common areas for [NAME] unit and 200-hall. This affected two residents (#23 and #63) and had the potential to affect all 144 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: 1. Observation on 02/03/25 at 9:38 A.M. of the 200-hall common area revealed a two-person fabric couch located to the right of the television across from room [ROOM NUMBER]. The couch armrests and seats were heavily soiled with the seat fabric torn open from the far-right of the cushion across toward the far-left of the cushion. The large tear was moderately wide which exposed the yellow-colored foam-like material underneath the fabric. Nearby, to the right of the couch was one non-reclining fabric chair with an ottoman placed in front of it which was located across from room [ROOM NUMBER]. Both the chair and the ottoman were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, interview and review of the NSO (Nurses Services Organization) guidelines, the facility failed to ensure Resident #13's bowel and bladder assessment was accurately documented in Resident #13's medical record. This affected one resident (#13) out of three residents reviewed for incontinence care. The facility census was 144. Findings include: Resident #13 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute cystitis (urinary bladder infection), encephalopathy, morbid obesity, diabetes mellitus, obstructive sleep apnea, anxiety, cognitive decline, arthritis, scoliosis, diverticulitis, vitamin D deficiency, Raynaud's Syndrome, depression, insomnia, thyrotoxicosis (excessive thyroid hormone) with goiter, fibromyalgia (wide-spread pain), hypothyroidism (underactive thyroid), and meninges (membranes covering the brain) tumor. A review of Resident #13's clinical record revealed a Minimum Data Set (MDS) admission assessment dated [DATE] which indicated Resident #13 had an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interview, review of employee corrective action and facility policy review, the facility failed to complete wound treatments as ordered by the physician for Resident #15. This affected one resident (#15) of three residents reviewed for treatments. The facility census was 144. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #15 revealed an admission date of 10/28/24 with diagnoses including disorders of veins, peripheral vascular disease, congestive heart failure and diabetes mellitus type two. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/03/24, revealed the resident had no cognitive impairment. The weekly nurse practitioner (NP) wound assessments from 12/05/24 to 01/23/25 indicated Resident #15 had chronic left lower extremity (LLE) vascular ulcers, one medial and one lateral, which required daily wound dressing changes. Review of Resident #15's treatment administration record (TAR) from December 2024 to January 2025 revealed a daily dressing change ordered to begin 12/06/24 for the LLE medial and lateral wounds. On 12/20/24,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #56 and Resident #63 were assisted with toileting and/or incontinence care and failed to provide a toileting program for Resident #63. This affected two residents (#56 and #63) out of three residents reviewed for incontinence care. The facility census was 144. Findings include: 1. Resident #56 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including high blood pressure, atherosclerotic heart disease, hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol), Gilbert Syndrome (A syndrome in which the liver of affected individuals processes bilirubin more slowly than the majority.), senile degeneration of the brain, adjustment disorder, diabetes mellitus, and malnutrition. Resident #56's care plan initiated on 04/02/24 indicated Resident #56 had bladder incontinence. The goal of the care plan was Resident #56 would remain clean and odor free through review date. Interventions on the care plan included providing perineal care as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 22 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #36 was reweighed according to facility policy and failed to have documented evidence the physician was notified of after an 8.7% weight loss in 30 days and failed to ensure Resident #37's weekly weights were obtained as ordered. This affected two residents (#36 and #37) of three residents reviewed for nutrition and had the potential to affect all 144 residents in the facility. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #36 revealed an admission date of 06/04/20. Diagnoses included malnutrition, muscle weakness, prostate disorder, depression and diabetes. Review of Resident #36's weight record revealed on 12/04/24 Resident #36 weighed 322 pounds and on 01/03/2025 Resident #36 weighed 294 pounds which was a 8.70% weight loss in 30 days. There was no documented evidence the physician was notified of the weight loss and no documented evidence a reweight was obtained. Review of the care plan dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #128's oxygen was administered as ordered by the physician and failed to ensure Resident #128's oxygen tubing was changed as ordered. This affected one resident (#128) of three residents reviewed for oxygen administration and had the potential to affect four additional residents (#36, #60, #95, #128 and #443) identified by the facility as receiving oxygen therapy. The facility census was 144. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #128 revealed an admission date of 09/26/24. Diagnoses included left rib fracture, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), kidney disease, and history of stroke. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #128 was cognitively intact. She required supervision for eating and oral hygiene, partial to moderate assistance for personal hygiene and was dependent on staff for showering and toileting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure pre and post dialysis assessments were accurate and complete. This affected two residents (#37 and #83) of three residents reviewed for dialysis. The facility census was 144. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #37 revealed an admission date of 12/13/24. Diagnoses included congestive heart failure, diabetes, morbid obesity, kidney disease, dysphagia, anemia, and vitamin D deficiency. Review of the care plan dated 12/16/24 revealed Resident #37 received dialysis three days per week. Interventions included assisting with transfers to dialysis, checking for new orders upon return from dialysis, maintaining communication with dialysis staff and physicians, and monitoring the shunt for signs and symptoms of infection. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #37 was moderately cognitively impaired. She required supervision for eating and was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and review of the facility policy, the facility did not have an individualized care plan with interventions regarding Resident #76's post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). This affected one resident (#76) of two residents reviewed for PTSD and had the potential to affect six residents (#15, #21, #38, #76, #194, and #293) that were identified by the facility diagnosed with PTSD. The facility census was 144. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #76 revealed an admission date of 12/04/24 with diagnoses including PTSD, Bipolar disorder, major depression, congestive heart failure, and diabetes. Review of the admission packet dated 12/05/24 and completed by Registered Nurse (RN) #1288 revealed Resident #76 had experienced trauma in his life, but he did not have any triggers identified. Review of the care plan dated 12/10/24 revealed Resident #76 required assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) related to alcoholic cirrhosis of the liver, PTSD, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure pharmacist recommendations for Resident #36 were addressed by the physician. This affected one resident (#36) of three residents reviewed for unnecessary medication. The facility census was 144. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #36 revealed an admission date of 06/04/20. Diagnoses included hypertension, anxiety, malnutrition, muscle weakness, prostate disorder, depression, and diabetes. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #36 was cognitively intact. He required set-up help for eating, supervision for oral hygiene, substantial or maximum assistance for personal hygiene and was dependent for toileting and showering. Review of the physician's orders for February 2025 revealed an order for Lasix 20 milligrams (mg) (diuretic) once per day which began on 09/18/23 and an order for Hydroxyzine 50 mg (antihistamine) three times per day which began…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure all medications were secured and stored in locked compartments that would limit access only to authorized personnel. This affected three residents (Residents #13, Resident #16 and Resident #95) out of 31 who residents resided on the 200-nursing unit. The facility census was 144. Findings include: 1. Resident #13 admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute cystitis with hematuria, encephalopathy, morbid obesity with status post gastric sleeve, diabetes mellitus, methicillin susceptible staphylococcus aureus infection, and anxiety. Review of Resident #13's medical record dated 01/01/25 to 02/03/25 showed no physician order for self-medication or an assessment of ability to provide self-medication included in the care plan and Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment. Resident #13's clinical record indicated he had moderate cognitive impairment with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment score of ten,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to administer the pneumonia and Coronavirus-19 (Covid-19) vaccine to Resident #125. This affected one resident (#125) out of five residents reviewed for immunizations. The facility census was 144. Findings include: Resident #125 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of malignant neoplasm of stomach, bipolar disorder, and feeding difficulties with gastrostomy, dysphagia, protein calorie malnutrition, and urinary incontinence. A review of Resident #125's medical record revealed Resident #125's signed request dated 11/11/24 revealed Resident #125 wanted to receive the pneumococcal and Covid-19 vaccinations. Review Resident #125's electronic medical record dated 11/08/24 through 02/04/25 revealed no provider orders for the pneumococcal or Covid-19 vaccination. Review of Minimal Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment for Resident #125 completed on 12/19/24 showed the pneumococcal vaccine was not offered, and Resident #125 was not up to date with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to maintain fall prevention interventions as ordered by the physician for Resident #112 to prevent further falls. This affected one resident (#112) of three residents reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 125. Findings include: Record review for Resident #112 revealed an admission date of 03/01/21. Diagnoses included encephalopathy, unspecified dementia with other behavioral disturbances, spinal stenosis, muscle weakness, difficulty in walking, unspecified psychosis, and Alzheimer's disease. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #112 was rarely or never understood. Resident #112 had no impairment to the upper or lower extremities and used no mobility devices. Resident #112 required setup or cleanup assistance with meals, substantial/max assistance for toileting, and partial/moderate assistance for transfers. Resident #112 had no falls since admission.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-03 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure an effective pest control program. This finding had the potential to affect 122 residents of 125 who eat meals from the kitchen as three residents (Residents #99, #103 and #108) received nothing by mouth. Findings include: Interview on 05/03/24 at 9:18 A.M. with Resident #73 revealed he had concerns with flying ants which were all over the place. Interview on 05/03/24 at 9:33 A.M. with Kitchen Aide #808 revealed the facility used a green liquid in the mop water for gnats in the kitchen but the facility still had a lot of gnats flying around the kitchen. Observation on 05/03/24 at 9:35 A.M. with Kitchen Aide #808 of the food cart located right outside of the kitchen doors revealed five to six black gnats flying around inside the food cart. Observation on 05/03/24 at 9:38 A.M. with Kitchen Aide #808 of the kitchen area revealed multiple gnats flying around the dishwasher and sink area of the kitchen. Interview on 05/03/24 at 9:47 A.M. with Maintenance Director #809 confirmed the facility had a gnat problem and he was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-30 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, review of the schedule and time clock punch report, record review, and review of facility policy revealed the facility did not ensure Resident #14's total parental nutrition (TPN) was administered in a safe manner including having a register nurse (RN) in the facility while it was infusing. This affected one resident (#14) out of one resident with an order for TPN. The facility census was 125. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #14 revealed an admission date of 01/4/24. He was discharged to the hospital on [DATE]. He was re-admitted on [DATE] (no longer on TPN). His diagnoses included sepsis, protein-calorie malnutrition, ileostomy status, acute kidney failure, and plasma-protein metabolism disorder. Review of the physician's order dated 01/05/24 revealed Resident #14 had the following TPN order: Amino acids (clinisol 15 percent) 110 gram (gm) per day, dextrose 330 milligram (mg) per day, Lipids (Intralipids 20 percent) 50 mg per day, sodium chloride 60…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-01 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify Resident #99's responsible party of the presence of bed bugs and subsequent room change. This affected one (#99) of three residents reviewed. The census was 133. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #99 revealed an admission date of 08/21/14 with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder, major depressive disorder, hypothyroidism, and lymphedema. Review of the resident contacts revealed Resident #99 was not her own responsible party. Further review of the medical record revealed there was no documentation of Resident #99's Responsible Party being notified of a room change due to bed bug treatments on 11/03/23. On 12/01/23 at 2:05 P.M., interview with Resident #99's Responsible Party stated he was never notified of anything related to bed bug treatments. On 12/01/23 at 2:40 P.M., interview with the Administrator verified Resident #99 was moved to another room on 11/03/23 due to bed bug treatment. He also confirmed that Resident #99's Responsible Party was not notified of the room change or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-12 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of the facility policy the facility failed to ensure Resident #23's advance directive was ordered per his preference. This affected one resident (#23) out of three residents reviewed for advance directives. The facility census was 126. Findings include: Review of Resident #23's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/21/18 with diagnoses including hepatic failure, encephalopathy, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of Resident #23's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #23 was cognitively intact and required supervision of one staff member for transfers and supervision with locomotion on unit. Resident #23 used a wheelchair. Review of Resident #23's DNR (Do Not Resuscitate) Identification Form, signed by Resident #23 and dated 10/26/18, revealed Resident #23's advance directive order was Do Not Resuscitate Comfort Care (DNRCC) indicating the resident would receive care that eases pain and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-12 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, policy review and review facility Self-Reported Incidents (SRIs), the facility failed to implement its policy to thoroughly investigate one incident of neglect and one incident of resident to resident abuse. This affected three residents (#50, #116 and #283) out of nine reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 126. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #50 revealed an admission date of 06/04/20 with diagnoses including diabetes, pancreatitis, obesity, and kidney failure. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #50 had intact cognition. He required extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility, toilet use and transfers, extensive assistance of one staff for hygiene, and was totally dependent on two staff for dressing. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #116 revealed an admission date of 10/20/22 with diagnoses including dementia and heart disease. Review of the comprehensive MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-12 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, policy review and review facility Self-Reported Incidents (SRIs), the facility failed to thoroughly investigate one incident of neglect and one incident of resident to resident abuse. This affected three residents (#50, #116 and #283) out of nine reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 126. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #50 revealed an admission date of 06/04/20 with diagnoses including diabetes, pancreatitis, obesity, and kidney failure. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #50 had intact cognition. He required extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility, toilet use and transfers, extensive assistance of one staff for hygiene, and was totally dependent on two staff for dressing. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #116 revealed an admission date of 10/20/22 with diagnoses including dementia and heart disease. Review of the comprehensive MDS 3.0 assessment dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-12 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure a safe and complete discharge for Resident #123. This affected one resident (#123) of three reviewed for discharge. The facility census was 126. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #123 revealed an admission date of 11/03/22 and a discharge date of 11/10/22. Diagnoses included a fracture of the left shoulder and gastro esophageal reflux disease (GERD). Review of a progress note dated 11/08/22 revealed Resident #123 told the facility she would not be returning to the facility after the appointment she had scheduled for the following day. The social worker was notified. Review of the medical record revealed no evidence of a physician's order for discharge, the resident received a discharge summary, or follow-up instructions. Interview on 01/12/23 at 9:48 A.M. with Social Services Designee (SSD) #622 confirmed there was no physician's order for discharge or discharge follow-up for Resident #123 once they were informed she would not be returning. Review of the undated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-12 · tag F0660 — isolated
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure Resident #125 was given all his medications upon discharge. This affected one resident (#125) of three residents reviewed for discharge. The facility census was 126. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #125 revealed an admission date of 09/20/22 and a discharge date of 10/05/22. Diagnoses included diabetes, hyperglycemia, chronic kidney disease, hypercholesterolemia, and atrial fibrillation. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #125 had moderately impaired cognition. Review of the physician's orders for October 2022 revealed Resident #125 was taking Vitamin D3 (supplement), Lasix (diuretic) 20 milligrams (mg), Acetaminophen (pain reliever) 650 mg, Ferrous Sulfate (iron supplement) 325 mg, Apixaban (anticoagulant) 2.5 mg, Pravastatin (medication to treat high cholesterol) 80 mg, Potassium Chloride extended release (ER) (supplement) 20…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-12 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure Resident #275 received physician ordered catheter care. This affected one resident (#275) out of one resident reviewed for catheter care. The facility census was 126. Findings include: Review of Resident #275's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/30/22. Diagnoses included hypotension, kidney failure, obstructive reflex uropathy, and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) with lower tract symptoms. Continued review of the medical record revealed the resident was admitted with a Foley catheter (a flexible tube that passes through the urethra and into the bladder to drain urine), but there was no documented evidence the resident was receiving Foley catheter care. Review of Resident #275's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition. Review of Resident #275's January 2023 Physician orders revealed an order for Foley catheter care per policy twice daily and as needed.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility policy the facility failed to ensure Resident #427 was administered oxygen per physician orders. This affected one resident (#427) out of three residents reviewed for oxygen administration. The facility census was 126. Findings include: Review of Resident #427's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/28/15 with diagnoses including congestive heart failure, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, and atrial fibrillation. Review of Resident #427's physician orders dated 10/13/22 revealed an order to discontinue oxygen at one to six liters per minute via nasal cannula to maintain oxygen saturation levels above 92 percent. Further review of Resident #427's physician orders from 10/13/22 through 01/04/23 did not reveal orders for oxygen administration. Review of Resident #427's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #427 was cognitively intact and did not use oxygen. Review of Resident #427's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-12 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility policy the facility failed to ensure Resident #115's psychotropic medication was administered as ordered. In addition, the facility failed to ensure Resident #124 had a diagnosis for a prescribed antipsychotic medication. This affected two residents (#115 and #124) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary psychotropic medications. The facility census was 126. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #115's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/09/22 with diagnoses including fracture of the neck of the left femur, end stage renal disease, and dementia. Review of Resident #115's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #115 was cognitively intact and required extensive assistance of two staff members for bed mobility and transfers and required the assistance of one staff member for toilet use. Review of Resident #115's physician orders dated 10/21/22 revealed an order for Risperidone tablet…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-12 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than five (5) percent (%). The medication error rate was calculated to be 8% and included two medication errors of 25 medication administration opportunities. This affected two residents (#46 and #31) of five residents observed during medication administration. The facility census was 126. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #46 revealed an admission date of 01/08/15. Diagnoses included schizoaffective disorder, anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder. Review of Resident #46's January 2023 physician's orders revealed Resident #46 had an order to receive Deplin 15-90.314 milligram (mg) capsule by mouth in the morning for hormone replacement. Observation on 01/11/23 at 7:40 A.M. of Registered Nurse (RN) #620 passing medications to Resident #46 revealed, RN #620 was unable to administer Resident #46's Deplin 15-90.314 mg. Interview on 01/11/23 at 8:07 A.M. RN #620 confirmed that the facility has not reordered Resident #46's Deplin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-12 · tag F0886 — failed to test for COVID-19 as required — isolated
    Perform COVID19 testing on residents and staff.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility policy the facility failed to ensure Resident #427 with symptoms of COVID-19 was tested timely. This affected one resident (#427) out of three residents reviewed for oxygen administration. The facility census was 126. Findings include: Review of Resident #427's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/28/15 with diagnoses including congestive heart failure, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, and atrial fibrillation. Review of Resident #427's physician orders dated 10/13/22 revealed an order to discontinue oxygen at one to six liters per minute via nasal cannula to maintain oxygen saturation levels above 92 percent. Further review of Resident #427's physician orders from 10/13/22 through 01/04/23 did not reveal orders for oxygen administration. Review of Resident #427's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #427 was cognitively intact and did not use oxygen. Review of Resident #427's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-12 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure Resident #1 and Resident #119's call lights were within reach. This affected two residents (#1 and #119) of three residents reviewed for call lights. The facility census was 126. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/15/18. Diagnoses included frontal lobe and executive function deficit, impulsiveness, and impulse control disorder. Review of Resident #1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had impaired cognition and needed extensive assistance for bed mobility and transfers. Observation on 01/10/23 at 9:06 A.M. revealed Resident #1 lying in bed with his call light device located out of his reach under his bed. The resident was yelling out for staff requesting more food. Observation on 01/10/23 at 4:30 P.M. Resident #1 was observed again lying in his bed. His call light remained in the same position under his bed. Interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CONTINUING HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.1-0.1 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 51.8+0.2 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 51.8+0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.3-0.3 vs chain
The other 11 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.1★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
BUNNER, MICHAELIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2016
MALLETT, CHRISTOPHERIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2016
PARSONS, BENJAMINIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2016
SPRENGER, MARKIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2016
SPRENGER, TIMOTHYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2016
HUGHEY, TRACYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2026
KAUFFMAN, KEVINIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2024
MILLER, MICHAELIndividualTRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2026

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$15.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+9.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$736K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 22%Medicare 3%Other / private 76%

This home reported $736K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$257per resident / day
operating cost
$7,809per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$285per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365823. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-02-06, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next