No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Riverside Landing Nursing And Rehabilitation

856 South Riverside Drive, McConnelsville, OH 43756 · For profit - Corporation · 50 certified beds · (740) 962-5303 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuseResident-funds citation (F0569)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0740, F0758)1 actual-harm citation
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jun 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0569)
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (71) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (68%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
859 N Main St · (740) 962-6111 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
105 N Kennebec Ave · (740) 962-2552 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Kroger3.1 mi
240 W Main St · (740) 962-2113 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased0.8%5.3%15.4%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.6%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.7%0.4%2.0%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms11.3%30.1%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.3%3.2%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened1.6%6.1%16.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication30.9%25.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.2%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control24.7%21.4%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table10.5%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication3.0%1.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%75.6%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission21.6%24.9%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit0.0%12.9%12.0%check this — see note marked star below the table

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

41.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 28 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

41.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.26U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.14hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.12hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 38% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 24% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF41.0%CMS range 26.8–58.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.6%CMS range 7.0–17.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay8.7%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.031.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.35
RN hours/ resident / day
1.36
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.67
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.38
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.31
RN hoursweekends
67.9%
Total nursing turnover
87.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 50 beds and averages 41.8 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.38 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.35 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.67 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.12 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.49 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.36 to 0.31 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 68% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

11
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-06-10)
28
at the previous standard inspection (2024-05-07)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

71 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 60 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-02-21 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #7 was free from abuse when Resident #29, a resident with a known history of aggressive behaviors and homicidal ideations abused the resident. This affected one resident (#7) of two residents reviewed for abuse. Actual physical and psychosocial harm occurred, applying the reasonable person concept, on 11/05/22 to Resident #7, a resident with impaired cognition, when Resident #29 struck Resident #7 multiple times in the face, was found with a choke hold around the resident's throat and threatened to kill the resident. Findings include: A review of Resident #7's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included dementia with behavioral disturbances, unspecified psychosis, and senile degeneration of the brain. A review of Resident #7's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had clear speech and adequate hearing. She was usually able to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store and prepare foods in a safe and sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect all 35 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 35.Findings include: Observations made during a tour of the kitchen on 04/27/26 from 9:00 A.M. to 9:20 A.M. revealed splattered dried food on the outside of the free-standing oven next to the stove. The food splatters had dripped down the side of the oven in several places and were white to tan, yellow, and/or clear in color. The outside of the free-standing oven beside the stove appeared greasy and sticky and was greasy to the touch. The floor between the free-standing oven and the stove was observed to be crumb-covered and had a plastic cap and a dried food spill next to the wall. The food spill was a pale yellow to tan in color about four inches in diameter, about a quarter of an inch thick and dried with the top of the spill cracked open in the center along the surface.Further observations made during a tour of the kitchen on 04/27/26 from 9:00 A.M. to 9:20 A.M.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-10 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility's cycle menu/ spreadsheet, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were served meals in a form that met their needs. This had the potential to affect seven residents (Resident #1, #10, #16, #19, #23, #41, and #95) of seven residents who the facility identified as being on a mechanical soft diet. Findings include: Review of the cycle menu for the Summer of 2025 revealed the residents were to receive chicken parmesan, spaghetti noodles, Italian blend mixed vegetables, choice of a roll, and cake. The spread sheet that went along with the cycle menu revealed the residents on a mechanical soft diet were to receive four ounces of chopped Italian blend mixed vegetables as part of their meal. On 06/04/25 at 12:10 P.M., an observation of the tray line for the lunch meal served revealed the facility had three different diets that were being provided to the residents. Of the three different diets, seven residents were ordered to receive mechanical soft diets. Each type of diet was observed to be served. The first mechanical soft…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of a facility self reported incident (SRI), review of the facility's related investigation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from physical abuse when another resident with a history of aggressive behaviors struck the resident in the face. This affected one (Resident #1) of two residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include: Review of an SRI with the tracking number 249042 revealed an allegation of physical abuse was made on [DATE]. The initial source of the allegation was from a staff member and the alleged perpetrator was identified as being another resident. The involved residents identified included Resident #1 (alleged victim) and Resident #9 (alleged perpetrator). Both residents were indicated to have been able to provide meaningful information when interviewed. Resident #1 was indicated to have a scratch on his face by his nose and Resident #9 was indicated not to have any injury or harm to him. The narrative summary of the incident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-10 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents did not have psychotropic medications ordered on an as needed basis (prn) limited to an initial 14 day order and only extended with a face to face evaluation of the resident with a clinical rationale as to why the prn psychotropic medication should be extended. They also failed to ensure non-pharmacological interventions (NPI's) were attempted prior to the use of an anti-psychotic medication intramuscularly (IM) ordered on a prn basis. This affected two (Resident #13 and #37) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #37's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included schizo-affective disorder (a mental health condition including schizophrenia and mood disorder symptoms), bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder, depression, and insomnia. Review of Resident #37's physician's orders revealed the resident had an order in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-10 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included adult onset diabetes mellitus. Review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was coded as having received an insulin injection during the seven day assessment period (05/19/25- 05/25/25). Section N. ) of the MDS (Medications) coded the resident as having received one insulin injection during the last seven days. Review of Resident #1's medication administration record (MAR) for May 2025 revealed there was no evidence of the resident having been given any insulin between 05/19/25 and 05/25/25. The resident was only noted to have received Trulicity that was given as a subcutaneous (SQ) injection, but Trulicity was not considered to be an insulin. Review of a drug reference information from Medscape on Trulicity revealed it was classified as an antidiabetic, Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Agonist used in the treatment of adults with adult onset (type 2)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-10 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Identification Screen submitted to the state Department of Medicaid was completed accurately to reflect all the resident's mental illness diagnoses. This affected one (Resident #17) of one residents reviewed for PASRR. Findings include: Review of Resident #17's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included paranoid schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder, and other specified depressive disorder. All listed diagnoses were in place at the time of her admission on [DATE]. Review of a PASRR Identification Screen completed for Resident #17 on 04/26/24 revealed the resident review was completed for a significant change in condition that was deemed to be a decline. Section E. ) of the identification screen included indications of serious mental illness. The assessor was to check all the listed diagnoses that applied. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for catheter care. This affected one resident (#6) of one sampled for catheter use. The facility census was 42. Findings include: Review of Resident #6's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/12/24 and diagnoses including malignant neoplasm of endometrium, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, lumbosacral disorder, fibromyalgia, hypertension, anemia, protein-calorie malnutrition, neurogenic bladder, and lumbosacral plexus disorder. Review of Resident #6's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition and reflected the use of an indwelling (urinary) catheter. Review of Resident #6's physician orders revealed the following orders dated 02/10/25: monitor urine for color, consistency and odor every shift, may irrigate catheter with 30 cubic centimeters (cc) of normal saline every 24 hours as needed for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-10 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. Review of Resident #37's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included hypertension and urinary retention. Review of Resident #37's active care plans revealed the resident had a care plan in place for receiving diuretic therapy related to acute renal failure. The care plan was initiated on 04/28/24. The goal was for the resident to be free from any discomfort or adverse reactions while receiving diuretic therapy through the review date. The target date was 08/13/25. Interventions included the need to administer medications as ordered. Review of Resident #37's active physician's orders revealed the resident did not have an order in place for the use of any diuretics. Review of her discontinued orders revealed the resident had not been on a diuretic medication since 06/26/24, when a diuretic had been discontinued. On 06/04/25 at 10:10 A.M., an interview with the facility's Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed Resident #37's active care plans reflected she had the use…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's pressure ulcer was assessed weekly for measurements and evidence of healing. This affected one (Resident #28) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings include: Review of Resident #28's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included a motor vehicle accident with a fracture of the pelvis, adult onset diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy and a foot ulcer, protein-calorie malnutrition, anemia, and peripheral vascular disease. Review of Resident #28's progress notes revealed a note dated 04/25/25 at 10:41 A.M. by the wound nurse practitioner that indicated the resident had a deep tissue pressure injury (DTPI) to the left heel that was present upon his admission. A DTPI was a localized area of discolored, intact skin, or a blood filled blister due to underlying soft tissue damage from pressure and/ or shear. The discolored area was typically…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-10 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide recommended restorative programs for a resident. This affected one resident (#9) of two residents reviewed for rehabilitative services. The facility census was 42. Findings include: Review of Resident #9's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/12/19, a re-entry/readmission date of 01/18/25 and diagnoses including acute respiratory failure, paraplegia, unspecified psychosis, asthma, and chronic hepatitis. Review of Resident #9's therapy records revealed an occupational therapy evaluation completed on 07/04/24 that indicated the resident did not require occupational therapy and referred/recommended the resident to the restorative nursing program. Review of Resident #9's medical record revealed a quarterly restorative assessment dated [DATE] that indicated the resident had been referred to the restorative nursing program by therapy, and that restorative nursing program was indicated for passive range of motion, active range of motion and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 60 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-10 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure pharmacy recommendations were appropriately implemented when agreed upon by the physician. This affected one (Resident #37) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications/ monthly medication regimen reviews. Findings include: Review of Resident #37's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility 04/27/24. Her diagnoses included hypothyroidism. Review of Resident #37's physician's orders revealed the resident had an order in place to receive Levothyroxine Sodium 75 micrograms (mcg) by mouth (po) every morning for hypothyroidism. The resident also had an order to receive Ferrous Sulfate 325 milligrams (mg) po every morning and Magnesium Oxide 400 mg po every morning as supplements. Review of Resident #37's pharmacy recommendations revealed the facility's contracted pharmacist made recommendations following monthly reviews of the resident's medication regimen. There were two recommendations made by the pharmacist that addressed the administration time for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-10 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to follow protocols for the use of an antibiotic to treat a urinary tract infection. This affected one resident (#6) of one residents reviewed for catheter use. The facility census was 42. Findings include: Review of Resident #6's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/12/24 and diagnoses including malignant neoplasm of endometrium, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, lumbosacral disorder, fibromyalgia, hypertension, anemia, protein-calorie malnutrition, neurogenic bladder, and lumbosacral plexus disorder. Review of Resident #6's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. The resident also had an indwelling catheter. Review of Resident #6's progress notes revealed on 05/19/25 at 11:06 P.M. an order was obtained to obtain a urine specimen for urinalysis and culture and sensitivity related to the resident having cloudy urine with an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-07 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the staffing daily posting, review of the schedule, review of timecards, review of the facility assessment, review of the quality assurance/performance improvement (QAPI), and interview the facility failed to ensure there was a Registered Nurse (RN) for eight consecutive hours and a full time Director of Nursing (DON). This had the potential to affect all 46 residents residing in the building. Findings included: 1. Review of the daily staffing posting dated 01/31/24 to 04/30/24 revealed there was no RN coverage for 01/06/24, 01/07/24, 01/13/24, 01/14/24, 01/20/24, 01/21/24, 01/27/24, and 01/28/24. Review of the facility assessment undated revealed the facility would have an RN at least eight hours daily. Review of the QAPI dated 02/01/24 to 03/01/14 revealed the problem was lack of RN coverage. The intervention was that the RDO would send out requests from other buildings to assist with coverage, offer sign on bonuses for RN coverage as of 02/22/24, and request requested others to participate from other buildings as of 03/2024. There was no evidence audits were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions were in place and failed to properly map infections in the facility. This had the potential to affect all 46 residents in the facility. Findings included: 1. Record review revealed Resident #3 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease with heart failure, type II diabetes, and neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder. Review of physician orders revealed Resident #3 had an order in place dated 04/05/23 for may change 16 French 10 cc indwelling catheter related to neurogenic bladder as needed for blockage and dislodgement. Review of a care plan dated 05/01/24 revealed Resident #3 had an alteration in elimination and neurogenic bladder which resulted in needing an indwelling foley catheter 16 French 10 milliliter balloon. Observation on 04/23/24 at 8:45 A.M. revealed Resident #3 had an uncovered catheter bag which was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-07 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, facility self-reported incident (SRI) review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse. This affected five residents (#2, #6, #17, #20, and #21) of seven residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 46. Findings included: 1. Record review revealed Resident #2 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including traumatic hemorrhage of cerebrum, spastic hemiplegia affecting left nondominant side, type II diabetes, bipolar disorder, panic disorder, and anxiety disorder. Review of a personal witness statement by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #328 dated 12/14/23 revealed LPN #328 was sitting in the nurse's station charting when she heard screaming from the dining room. She went to the dining room, and Resident #2 stated she had screamed due to another resident slapping her in the mouth, there was no swelling or redness noted. LPN #328 stated another male resident was in the dining area and witnessed Resident #2 getting slapped.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-07 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — pattern
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure physician's orders for the use of over the counter and narcotic pain medication ordered on an as needed (prn) basis for pain included parameters on when to use those medications, failed to ensure another resident only received prn narcotic pain medications for pain levels specified in the parameters of the physician's orders, failed to ensure a physician was notified when a resident's systolic blood pressure was outside the parameters provided by the physician with use of a beta-blocker, and failed to ensure a resident's use of prn Vistaril was clearly identified in the medical record to show the reason it was being given when the Vistaril was being used for both allergies and anxiety. This affected four (Resident #3, #14, Resident #41, and #42) of six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: 1. A review of Resident #14's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-07 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of the cycle menu for Week 1, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received all food items for each meal in accordance with the cycle menu. This had the potential to affect all but six residents (Resident #6, #17, #18, #20, #25, and #42) who the facility identified as being on a pureed diet. The facility's census was 46. Findings include: On 04/24/24 at 11:25 A.M., an observation of the tray line noted Dietary [NAME] #350 was preparing the trays for the residents for the lunch meal served. She started with the hall carts and then was to prepare trays for those residents eating in the dining room. The meal included sweet and sour meatballs, parsley noodles, carrots, ice cream and beverages of their choice. The residents receiving a pureed diet was noted to be receiving pureed bread, but none of the residents receiving a mechanical soft texture diet or a regular diet was receiving any type of bread product. Review of the cycle menu for week 1 for the lunch meal to be served on Wednesday 04/24/24 revealed the meal should include a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-07 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of the pureed food recipes, and staff interview, the facility failed to prepare pureed food in a manner that conserved the nutritional value of the food being pureed in accordance with the recipes. This affected six residents (Resident #6, #17, #18, #20, #25, and #42) of six residents who the facility identified as being on a pureed diet. Findings include: On 04/24/24 at 10:45 A.M., an observation of the pureed food process noted Dietary [NAME] #350 to puree three different food items that were to be served with the lunch meal on 04/24/24. The first food item that was pureed was the parsley noodles. She was observed to puree the parsley noodles without referring to a recipe. She added the scoops of parsley noodles using the correct serving size (#8/ 4 ounce scoop) into the Robot Coupe food processor. She blended the noodles and then was noted to add an unmeasured amount of water to the noodles to try to obtain the desired consistency she needed. She did not add any type of broth of chicken/ beef base to the water before adding it to the noodles. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-07 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, taste testing of the pureed food, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure pureed food was prepared in the form that met the needs of the residents. This affected six residents (Resident #6, #17, #18, #20, #25, and #42) of six residents who the facility identified as being on pureed diets. Findings include: On 04/24/24 at 10:45 A.M., an observation of the pureed food process for the lunch meal served on 04/24/24 revealed Dietary [NAME] #350 pureed three different food items that were to be served to the residents on a pureed diet for lunch. The first item pureed was the parsley noodles, followed by the sweet and sour meatballs, and then the carrots. The dietary cook did not taste any of the three food items that were pureed. She also did not follow any recipes when she pureed the three food items. The parsley noodles were of proper consistency despite her not tasting the noodles to verify that before putting them on the steam table until they were served for lunch. The sweet and sour meatballs were not at proper texture when she reported she achieved…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure lunch meals were served in a sanitary manner. This potentially affected all 46 residents that reside in the building. Findings included: Observation on 04/22/24 at 11:43 A.M. of lunch meal service revealed the A and B Hall trays arrived at the unit in a cart. State Tested Nurse's Assistant (STNA) #322 removed a container filled with condiments from the meal cart and placed it directly on the floor so she could get the coffee out. The STNA then picked up the condiment container and placed it back into the meal carts with the meal trays. Interview on 04/22/24 at 11:44 A.M., with STNA #322 confirmed she had placed the condiment container directly on the floor and placed it back into the meal cart with the resident meal trays. The STNA reported she didn't know what she was supposed to do because she was told she could not place anything on top of the meal cart and the kitchen staff always put the coffee behind the condiments container and she had to take the condiment container out to get to the coffee.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-07 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents met infection criteria for appropriate antibiotic use. This affected three (Residents #7, #17, and #24) of 10 residents reviewed for infection control. The facility census was 46. Findings included: 1. Record review revealed Resident #7 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including atrial fibrillation, dementia, and atherosclerotic heart disease without angina. Review of the infection control log for April 2024 revealed Resident #7 was treated for a urinary tract infection (UTI). Review of a urine culture dated 04/06/24 revealed Resident #7 tested positive for UTI with enterococcus Faecium VRE (Vancomycin resistant enterococcus). Review of McGeer Criteria for Infection Surveillance Checklist dated 04/08/24 revealed in order to be treated for a UTI criteria must be for section one (acute dysuria or pain, swelling, or tenderness of testes, epididymis, or prostate; fever of leukocytes and one of the following: acute…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-07 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, facility policy review and interview, the facility failed to provide care in a dignified manner for Resident #3 related to the use of a urinary catheter. This affected one resident (#3) of two residents reviewed for catheters. The facility census was 46. Findings included: Record review revealed Resident #3 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease with heart failure, type II diabetes, and neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder. Review of the resident's physician's orders revealed an order (dated 03/18/23) for Resident #3 to monitor and maintain 16 French 10 cubic centimeter (cc) indwelling catheter related to neurogenic bladder. On 04/23/24 at 8:45 A.M. Resident #3 was observed laying in bed and his urinary catheter bag was hanging from a lower bar of the bed, uncovered and half full of yellow urine which was visible from the hallway. Interview with Resident #3 at the time of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, facility policy review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided a clean, comfortable and homelike environment. This affected three residents (#3, #17, and #23) of three residents reviewed for environment. The facility census was 46. Findings included: 1. Record review revealed Resident #3 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease with heart failure, type II diabetes, and neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder. On 04/23/24 at 8:40 A.M. interview with Resident #3 revealed concerns related to the condition of his room. The resident revealed he could not recall his floors being stripped or waxed since he had been in the room and thought the floors looked dirty and scuffed up. Observation of the floors at the time of the interview revealed the floors had several black scuffs from Resident #3's bedside to the doorway along with small amounts of debris on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-07 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was free of restraints. This affected one resident (#1) of one resident reviewed for restraints. The facility census was 46. Findings included: Record review revealed Resident #1 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including intracranial injury with loss of consciousness greater than 24 hours with return to pre-existing conscious level, hemiplegia affecting right dominant side, and type II diabetes. Observation on 04/22/24 at 9:44 A.M. revealed Resident #1 in his motorized wheelchair with a seatbelt on. Observation on 04/24/24 at 11:31 A.M. revealed Resident #1 in his wheelchair with a seatbelt on. Interview on 04/24/24 at 2:34 P.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #327 revealed the facility did not have anyone with restraints in place, and the only type of assessments in place would be paperwork for bed rails. LPN #327 confirmed Resident #1 had a seatbelt on while in his…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of facility self-reported incidents (SRI's), staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to report allegations of abuse to the state agency in a timely manner for Residents #8 and #2, and an injury of unknown origin for Resident #17. This affected three (#8, #2, and #17) of six residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 46. Findings include: 1. A review of Resident #8's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including paraplegia; unspecified psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition; anxiety disorder; depression; panic disorder; abnormal posture; muscle wasting and atrophy; muscle weakness; and generalized anxiety disorder. Review of SRI tracking number 244564 and the facilities investigation dated 02/26/24 revealed the incident was discovered on 02/25/24 that there was a physical altercation between Resident #8 and another male resident. The SRI was not reported to the state…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-07 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were completed accurately to reflect a resident's dental status, vision status, proper diagnoses, and medications received. This affected three residents (#8, #23, and #31) of 22 residents reviewed for assessments. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #31's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including vascular dementia and hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a stroke (CVA) affecting his right dominant side. Review of Resident #31's physician's orders revealed the resident was receiving Atorvastatin (medication used to lower blood cholesterol levels) 80 milligrams (mg) by mouth (po) every night at bedtime for hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol in the blood). The Atorvastatin had been in place since 03/15/23. The resident also used Plavix (an anti-platelet) 75 mg po every morning for a CVA. The resident's physician's orders did not reveal the use of an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-07 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Pre-admission Screening and Resident Reviews (PASRRs) reviews for Residents #6 and #17 were accurate. This affected two residents (#6 and #17) of two residents reviewed PASRRs. The facility census was 46. Findings included: 1. Record review revealed Resident #6 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, anxiety disorder, obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD), mild cognitive impairment, major depression. Diagnoses of anorexia nervosa and psychosis were added on 01/04/23. Review of a PASRR dated 03/28/24 revealed Resident #6 had a mood disorder and a panic disorder but did not list Resident #6's diagnoses of psychosis or anorexia nervosa. Interview on 04/25/24 at 3:39 P.M. with Social Services Designee (SSD) #347 confirmed Resident #6's most recent PASRR did not list diagnoses of anorexia nervosa or psychosis. 2. Record review revealed Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide nail care for Resident #1, who was dependent on staff for assistance with hygiene. This affected one resident (#1) of three residents reviewed for personal hygiene. The facility census was 46. Findings included: Record review revealed Resident #1 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including other specified intracranial injury with loss of consciousness greater than 24 hours with return to pre-existing conscious level, hemiplegia affecting right dominant rise, type II diabetes, aphasia, hypertension, contracture of muscle of right upper arm and hand, and Alzheimer's disease. Review of a care plan dated 01/28/10 revealed Resident #1 had a self-care deficit related to brain injury with hemiparesis and mobility impairment with a goal of Resident #1 having his activity of daily living (ADL) needs met daily. Interventions included providing needed assistance with self-care daily. Review of a care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided timely care when a change of condition was noted, failed to ensure specialist appointments were made, and failed to ensure the bowel protocol was implemented timely. This affected one resident (#41) of two reviewed for hospitalization, one resident (#27) of six reviewed for pain management, and one resident (#32) of one reviewed for constipation. Findings included: 1. Record review revealed Resident #41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia with behavioral disturbance, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, acute kidney failure, chronic kidney disease, hepatitis, and mental disorders. Review of Resident #41's admission assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was alert and oriented times three (person, place, and time), coherent, speech was clear, understood others, and able to make self-understand. a. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-07 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of therapy notes, and interview the facility failed to ensure range of motion (ROM) services were implemented per plan of care and failed to ensure therapy services were provided when a resident had a noted decline. This affected two residents (#8 and #41) of four residents reviewed for positioning/restorative. Findings included: 1. Record review revealed Resident #41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including respiratory failure, chronic kidney disease, hepatitis, mental disorder, and wedge compression fracture. Review of Resident #41's admission assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had no neurological or mobility impairments. The resident was alert and oriented times three and able to make needs known. Review of Resident #41's hospital discharge notes dated 10/04/23 revealed the resident was hospitalized from [DATE] to 10/04/23 for multifocal pneumonia, acute hypoxic respiratory failure, acute toxic metabolic encephalopathy, acute…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #14, who had a history of falls, had fall prevention interventions in place according to the physician's orders and plan of care. This affected one resident (#14) of four residents reviewed for accidents. Findings included: Review of Resident #14's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including malignant neoplasm of the frontal lobe, unspecified psychosis, Type I (juvenile onset) diabetes mellitus, epilepsy (seizures), unsteadiness on her feet, abnormalities of gait and mobility, and a history of falling. Review of Resident #14's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident did not have any communication issues and was cognitively intact. She was not indicated to have displayed any behaviors or reject care during the seven-day assessment period. No mobility devices were indicated to have been used. Review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-07 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure tube feeding was administered as ordered by the physician and failed to ensure new orders were implemented timely. This affected one resident (#44) of one resident reviewed for tube feedings. Findings included: Record review revealed Resident #44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including aphasia, dysphagia, and gastrostomy. a. Review of Resident #44's dietary note dated 04/18/24 revealed to discontinue Jevity 240 milliliters (ml) with meals if oral intake was less than 50%. The resident reported she preferred house supplements eight ounces if she doesn't eat more than 50% of meals. New orders for houses supplement eight ounces if meal intakes are less than 50% per resident preference. Review of Resident #44's order dated 04/22/24 at 2:33 P.M., revealed the order for Jevity was still active, and there was no evidence the new order for house supplement was implemented. Interview on 04/25/24 at 9:39 A.M., with Assistant…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-07 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of transit receipt, and interview the facility failed to ensure a resident was referred to pain management clinic timely. This affected one (Resident #8) of six resident reviewed for pain. Findings included: A review of Resident #8's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included paraplegia; unspecified psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition; anxiety disorder; depression; panic disorder; abnormal posture; muscle wasting and atrophy; muscle weakness; chronic pain; cerebral infarction; nondisplaced fracture of medial malleolus of right tibia; osteoporosis; and generalized anxiety disorder. Review of Resident #8's current plan of care revealed the resident had alteration in comfort related to chronic pain, chronic wound to back with hardware visible, neuropathic pain, and gastric reflux disease. The resident intervention included an appointment with a pain specialist as needed. Review of Resident #8's order…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure insulin flexpens were properly dated after they had been removed from the refrigerator and was used for the first time. This affected three residents (Resident #10, #13, and #16) whose insulin flexpens were found when reviewing two of two medication administration carts used by the facility for the storage of medications. Findings include: On 05/01/24 at 1:50 P.M., an observation of the medication administration cart for the A and B-hall revealed there were insulin flexpens found in the pull out drawer that had not been properly dated, after they had been removed from refrigeration during storage and used for the first time for the residents they were ordered for. Resident #16 was noted to have a Lantus flexpen (long acting insulin) 100 units/ milliliter (ml) that was in a plastic bag marked with a sticker to refrigerate. There was a label on the Lantus flexpen where the nurse was to date the flexpen, after it had been removed from the refrigerator and used for the first time. The label was left…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-07 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure laboratory testing was completed as ordered. This affected one (Resident #41) of two reviewed for hospitalization. Findings included: Record review revealed Resident #41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia with behavioral disturbance, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, acute kidney failure, chronic kidney disease, hepatitis, and mental disorders. Review of Resident #41's written orders dated [DATE] revealed the Nurse Practitioner (NP) wrote orders for complete blood count (CBC) and Chem 8. There were no diagnoses or rational for order. Review of Resident #41's nurses note dated [DATE] written by the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) #361 revealed the NP visited and new orders were received for labs (CBC and Chem 8) in the morning. The resident and resident representative aware. Review of Resident #41's Medication and Treatment Records dated 09/2023…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-07 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure dental services were arranged in a timely manner. This affected one (Resident #8) of two reviewed for dental services. Findings included: A review of Resident #8's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included paraplegia; unspecified psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition; anxiety disorder; depression; panic disorder; abnormal posture; muscle wasting and atrophy; muscle weakness; and generalized anxiety disorder. Review of Resident #8's dental plan of care dated 05/16/22 revealed the resident had dental caries and abscess teeth. Intervention included to coordinate arrangement for dental care, monitor for any dental problems needing attention, and to provide mouth care. Review of Resident #8 significant change minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident has no dental issues. Review of Resident #8 dental note dated 07/26/23 revealed the resident had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-07 · tag F0800 — isolated
    Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, and review of the alternate meal menu, the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided a nutritious meal of choice when she declined the main meal being served for the lunch meal on 04/23/24. This affected one resident (Resident #37) of one residents reviewed for alternate meal choices. Findings include: Review of Resident #37's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included schizo-affective disorder of the bipolar type, morbid obesity due to excess calories, post traumatic stress disorder, Asperger's syndrome, anxiety disorder, psychotic disorder with delusions from known physiological condition, borderline personality disorder, and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Review of Resident #37's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident did not have any communication issues and was cognitively intact. She was able to make herself understood and was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-07 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to administer the pneumococcal vaccine to a resident who consented to receiving it. This affected one (Resident #21) of five residents reviewed for vaccinations. The facility census was 46. Findings included: Record review revealed Resident #21 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute respiratory failure, metabolic encephalopathy, type II diabetes, and hypertension. Review of a consent form for a pneumococcal vaccination revealed Resident #21's responsible party consented to Resident #21 receiving the vaccine on 11/08/23. Review of the medical record provided no evidence the vaccination had been administered. Interview on 04/24/24 at 11 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse #361 confirmed Resident #21 had a consent to receive the pneumococcal vaccination on 11/08/23 but had not yet received it. Review of an undated policy titled Influenza, Pneumococcal, Shingles, and COVID-19 Immunization revealed each resident will be offered the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-07 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to offer vaccinations for COVID-19. This affected three (Resident #3, #8, and #21) of five residents reviewed for vaccinations. The facility census was 46. Findings included: 1. Record review revealed Resident #3 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease, type II diabetes, and respiratory failure. Review of vaccination consents revealed Resident #3 had not been offered a vaccination for COVID-19 since 11/14/22. Review of a handwritten statement dated 04/24/24 signed by Resident #3 revealed facility had offered the vaccine and he had declined. Interview on 04/24/24 at 11 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #361 confirmed the only consent available from Resident #3 was from 2022 2. Record review revealed Resident #8 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including paraplegia, chronic hepatitis, unspecified atherosclerosis, hypertension, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-05 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, review of the facility menu, and review of the food committee minutes the facility failed to ensure meals, snacks and alternate menu items were offered and provided to the residents per their preferences and requests. This had the potential to affect all the residents residing at the facility who received food prepared in the kitchen. The facility census was 42. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Residents #5 revealed an admission date of 06/16/23 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder, type two diabetes mellitus, obesity, borderline personality disorder and schizoaffective disorder. Review of the January 2024 physician orders for Resident #5 revealed the resident was ordered a regular diet with regular texture and thin liquids and double portions. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #5 dated 11/17/23 revealed the resident was cognitively intact and required set-up help only for meals. Resident #5 had no problems with chewing or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and review of the facility's catheter care protocols, the facility failed to ensure a resident's dressing to his midline catheter was changed in accordance with his physician's orders. This affected one resident (#50) of three residents reviewed for dressing changes. Findings include: A review of Resident #50's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of sepsis (life threatening medical emergency when an infection you have triggers a chain reaction throughout your body) and Methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) as the cause of a disease classified elsewhere. A review of Resident #50's physician's orders revealed he had an order to maintain a midline catheter (a long, thin, flexible tube that was inserted into a large vein in the upper arm to safely administer medication into the bloodstream) to the left upper arm every shift until the antibiotic therapy treatment was complete. There was also an order to provide…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-07 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received treatments to her pressure ulcer consistently as ordered by the physician. This affected one resident (#47) of three residents reviewed for wound care. Findings include: A review of Resident #47's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. She was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], after a hospitalization. Her diagnoses included a cutaneous abscess of the buttocks. She developed an Unstageable pressure ulcer (full-thickness skin and tissue loss in which the extent of tissue damage within the ulcer could not be confirmed because it was obscured by slough or eschar) to her right buttock that was present upon her re-admission to the facility on [DATE]. The unstageable pressure ulcer revealed a Stage III pressure ulcer (full-thickness loss of skin, in which fat was visible in the ulcer and it may or may not contain slough and/ or eschar) to the right buttock after the slough/ eschar was removed.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure fall prevention interventions were implemented to prevent avoidable falls. This affected one resident (#25) of three residents reviewed for falls. Findings include: A review of Resident #25's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included toxic encephalopathy, hypertension, transient ischemic attacks, seizure disorder, atrial fibrillation, abnormalities of gait and mobility, unsteadiness on his feet, muscle weakness, insomnia, and disorientation. A review of Resident #25's fall risk assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was at risk for falls related to impaired decision making, needing assistance with activities of daily living (adl's), unsteady gait, use of assistive devices for mobility, and bladder incontinence. A review of Resident #25's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed he did not have any communication issues and his…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-07 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident receiving Coumadin (an anticoagulant) had Prothrombin (PT)/ International Normalized Ratio (INR) levels monitored consistently as ordered by the physician. This affected one resident (#25) of three residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: A review of Resident #25's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included atrial fibrillation (an irregular heart rhythm that commonly caused poor blood flow). He was hospitalized between 10/08/23 and 10/12/23. A review of Resident #25's physician's orders revealed he was receiving Coumadin 1 milligrams (mg) by mouth (po) once a day at bedtime. The Coumadin dosage had been ordered since 12/01/23. Prior dosages included 8 mg po daily (08/25/23- 09/11/23), 9 mg po daily (09/11/23- 10/04/23), and 10 mg po daily (10/04/23- 12/01/23). His physician's orders also included the need to obtain a PT/ INR (blood test that determined the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-07 · tag F0773 — isolated
    Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident's physician was notified of laboratory test results timely after they were obtained. This affected one resident (#25) of three residents reviewed. Findings include: A review of Resident #25's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included atrial fibrillation (an irregular heart rhythm that commonly caused poor blood flow). He was hospitalized between 10/08/23 and 10/12/23. A review of Resident #25's physician's orders revealed he was receiving Coumadin 1 milligrams (mg) by mouth (po) once a day at bedtime. That Coumadin dosage had been ordered since 12/01/23. Prior dosages included 8 mg po daily (08/25/23- 09/11/23), 9 mg po daily (09/11/23- 10/04/23), and 10 mg po daily (10/04/23- 12/01/23). A physician order dated 11/28/23 revealed an order was received to repeat a PT/ INR due to a clinically high INR of 6.4 (therapeutic INR was between 2.0 and 3.0). A review of Resident #25's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, facility infection control log review and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure they had a complete infection control monitoring system which included the organisms causing the infection. This had the potential to affect all 43 residents. Findings included: Review of the facility infection control logs dated May 2023 to July 2023, revealed an inability for the facility to note trends or patterns of infection due to the facility did not track the organism causing the infection on the log. Review of the infection control mapping, dated May 2023 to July 2023, revealed the facility was tracking what body system (respiratory, skin, and etc.) but not what organism affected the body system. Interview on 08/24/23 at 10:25 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #121, who was also the Infection Preventionist, verified the infection control log was not complete and the missing piece of the infection control log was what organism caused the infection. She verified the mapping the facility used noted what body system (skin, respiratory, and etc.) was affected…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-24 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, resident record review and facility policy review the facility failed to provide dignity and respect to one resident (#39) of three residents reviewed. The facility census was 43. Findings included: Review of Resident #39's medical record revealed an initial admission date of 11/10/22 and a readmission dated of 02/14/23 with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy, altered mental status, essential hypertension, and age related physical debility. Review of Resident #39's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 06/12/23, revealed he was cognitively impaired. Further review revealed he needed extensive assistance from one person to physically assist him with eating. Review of Resident #39's plan of care, dated 02/27/23, revealed he had an activity of daily living self-care performance deficit related to debility, progression of aging, and needing assistance. Intervention included she required supervision by one staff to eat. Observation on 08/24/23 at 7:40 A.M. of State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #129 assisting resident #39 with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-02-21 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on daily staffing posting review, schedule review, Facility Assessment review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure registered nurse services were provided eight hours daily, seven days per week. This had the potential to affect all 39 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of the Facility assessment dated [DATE] revealed the facility's staffing levels are based upon the acuity of their residents and resident population. The staffing pattern may fluctuate depending upon daily census and residents' needs. The facility provides a Registered Nurse at least eight hours daily. Review of the daily staffing postings from 12/16/22 through 02/16/23 revealed no registered nurse coverage on the following dates: 12/17/22, 12/18/22, 12/19/22, 12/21/22, 12/22/22, 12/23/22, 12/24/22, 12/31/22, 01/01/23, 01/02/23, 01/07/23, 01/08/23, 01/14/23, 01/15/23, 01/21/23, 01/22/23, 01/23/23, 01/24/23, 02/03/23, 02/04/23, 02/05/23, and 02/12/23. Review of the January and February 2023 Nursing Staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-02-21 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure the Dietary Manager met the requirements for the position. This had the potential to affect all 39 residents residing in the facility and receiving food from the kitchen. Findings included: Review of the kitchen staff ServSafe Certifications revealed the following staff were certified: Dietary [NAME] (DC) #204, DC #232, Dietary Aide (DA) #211, and DA #218. There was no documentation to support Dietary Manager (DM) #52 had ServSafe certification. Interview on 02/15/23 at 11:25 A.M. with DM #52 verified he did not have a ServSafe Certification or a Food Protection Certification. Interview on 02/16/23 at 7:35 A.M. with DM #52 verified there was no full-time dietitian or diet tech in the facility. He verified he did not meet the requirements as director of food and nutrition services. He reported he had more than two years of experience in the position of director of food and nutrition services in a nursing facility setting but had not completed a course of study in food safety and management. He reported he has had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-02-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review and policy review the facility failed to ensure food was stored and prepared under sanitary conditions. This had the potential to affect all 39 residents residing in the facility and receiving food from the kitchen. Findings included: 1. Observation on 02/13/23 at 6:18 P.M. revealed one gallon of apple cider vinegar one-half full and one gallon of paint propping the pantry door open. Interview on 02/13/23 at 6:25 P.M. with Dietary Aide (DA) #211 verified a container of apple cider vinegar was on the floor and food items are not to be on the floor and a gallon of paint should not be in the pantry. 2. Observation on 02/13/23 at 6:19 P.M. revealed a container of brown sugar in the pantry with a plastic spoon in the container. Interview on 02/13/23 at 6:25 P.M. with DA #211 verified there should not be a spoon in the brown sugar. 3. Observation on 02/13/23 at 6:21 P.M. revealed both ovens in the range were noted to be dirty with burnt food. Interview on 02/13/23 at 6:25 P.M. with DA #211 verified the ovens were dirty and had been dirty for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-02-21 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, maintenance request review, the facility failed to ensure the commercial washing machine remained in service. This had the potential to affect all the residents in the facility. Findings include: Observation of the laundry room on 02/15/23 at 1:46 P.M. revealed the only commercial washing machine had a broken sign on it. Interview on 02/15/23, at the time of the observation, with Laundry #221 included the facility laundry had one Electrolux W5240H commercial washing machine and two residential washing machines. The commercial washing machine was currently broken. The service company will not service it any longer. Maintenance is aware. Since there is only one commercial washer when it is out of service staff can not keep up with the washing of personals and linens for the facility. Interview on 02/15/23 at 2:27 P.M. with Housekeeping/Laundry Supervisor (HLS) #201 included the industrial washing machine had been really bad the last year. HLS #201 affirmed occupational therapy and assisted living washer and dryers are used to provide enough clean linen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-21 · tag F0569 — isolated
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident funds review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to adequately notify resident and/or representative to assure they received spend-down notifications and reimburse overage due to the possibility of lost Medicaid eligibility for reaching and exceeding the maximum resource limit. This affected one of two current residents reviewed for facility-managed funds (#19) spend-down notice. The facility managed 18 resident accounts. The total resident census was 39. Findings include: Resident funds review revealed Resident #19 had $3268.39 in their personal funds account as of 02/09/23. Review of the quarterly statements since June 2022 revealed the account had been over the Medicaid limit since 06/03/22 when the account had $3154.76, ($954.76 over the funds limit allowed taking into account the grace period for government stimulus check). Review of the account revealed the balance had not dropped below the $2200.00 limit since 06/03/22. Review of the quarterly statements revealed they were signed by the resident's representative. A spend-down letter dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-21 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff interview and policy review the facility failed to provide a Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice (SNFABN) form to Resident #28 when the resident was cut from skilled nursing services and remained in the facility. This affected one resident (#28) of three residents reviewed for cut letters. The census was 39. Findings include: Review of Resident #28's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/13/22 with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy, diabetes, and schizoaffective disorder. The resident/resident representative was notified on 02/01/23 that skilled services would end on 02/03/23. There was no appeal of the notice and Resident #28 remained in the facility to current date for long term care. There was no evidence the facility provided a SNFABN as required to allow the resident to choose to continue the services when the resident was discharged from skilled care. On 02/16/23 at 5:18 P.M. interview with Social Service Designee (SSD) #209 verified the resident was cut from skilled services, remained in the facility and was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-21 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of a self reporting incident (SRI), resident interview, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's concerns/ grievance was resolved timely by the facility. This affected one (#26) of two residents reviewed for personal property. Findings include: A review of Resident #26's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included morbid obesity due to excess calories, muscle wasting and atrophy, muscle weakness, and difficulty walking. A review of Resident #26's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident did not have any communication issues and was cognitively intact. No behaviors was noted during the seven day assessment period. A review of Resident #26's care plans revealed he did not have any care plans in place that indicated he was known to have any behaviors or make false accusations. A review of Resident #26's progress notes revealed a nurse's note dated 09/04/22 at 12:00…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of a self reporting incident (SRI), resident interview, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure allegations of misappropriation was reported to the state survey agency timely as required. This affected one (#26) of two residents reviewed for misappropriation. Findings include: A review of Resident #26's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included morbid obesity due to excess calories, muscle wasting and atrophy, muscle weakness, and difficulty walking. A review of Resident #26's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident did not have any communication issues and was cognitively intact. No behaviors was noted during the seven day assessment period. A review of Resident #26's care plans revealed he did not have any care plans in place that indicated he was known to have any behaviors or make false accusations. A review of Resident #26's progress notes revealed a nurse's note…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-21 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure allegations of abuse were thoroughly investigated. This affected one resident (#29) of two residents reviewed for abuse. The census was 39. Findings include: Review of Resident #29's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/22/22 with diagnoses including diabetes with foot ulcer, chronic ulcer of the left foot, post-traumatic stress disorder and homicidal ideations. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact. The resident also displayed physical and verbal behavioral symptoms directed toward others. The resident required extensive assistance of one to two staff members with activities of daily living. Review of Self-Reported Incident Number 230304 dated 12/19/22 revealed at 2:00 P.M. the resident stated he got $2.00 out of his wallet on 12/17/22 in the evening and still had $93.00 remaining. The resident stated he put his wallet back in the drawer Saturday…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-21 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview and policy review the facility failed to provide residents with the bed hold notice prior to a transfer to an acute care setting. This affected one resident (#39) of one resident reviewed for hospitalization. The census was 39. Findings include: Review of the closed medical record for Resident #39 revealed an admission date of 01/26/23 with diagnoses including encephalopathy, acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, alcoholic cirrhosis and anxiety. Review of the five day Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment and required staff assistance with activities of daily living. Review of the progress notes revealed on 01/31/23 at 7:00 P.M. Resident #39 was transferred to the emergency room for evaluation of altered mental status. Further review of the medical record revealed no evidence a bed hold notice was provided to the resident or responsible party when the resident was transferred to the hospital. On 02/15/23 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-21 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure a resident's Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) was updated after mental health diagnoses additions. This affected one resident (#6) of two residents reviewed for PASARR. The facility census was 39. Findings included: Review of Resident #6's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/20/22 with diagnoses including bipolar disorder entered on 08/20/22, schizoaffective (psychotic) disorder, bipolar type entered on 08/22/22, and anxiety disorder entered on 08/22/22. Review of Resident #6's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 11/22/22, revealed he was cognitively independent and had active psychiatric disorders of anxiety, bipolar, and schizophrenia. Review of Resident #6's most recent Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR), dated 08/18/22, revealed in Section E: indication of Serious Mental Illness, the only disorder marked was mood disorder. The box beside other psychotic disorder was not marked. Interview on 02/14/23 at 10:40 A.M. with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure care conferences were completed quarterly. This affected one resident (#23) of two residents reviewed for care planning. The facility census was 39. Findings included: Review of Resident #23's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of type two diabetes, unilateral primary osteoarthritis, and essential hypertension. Review of Resident #23's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 Assessment, dated 01/04/23, revealed she was mildly cognitively impaired. Review of Resident #23's Multidisciplinary Care Conferences dates documented in the electronic health record revealed she had conferences completed on 07/01/21, 08/16/21, 05/09/22, 08/02/22, and 12/02/22. There was no documentation of care conferences between 08/16/21 and 05/09/22. An interview on 02/14/23 at 7:47 A.M. with Resident #23 revealed she did not remember having care conferences every three months. An interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, shower list review, staff and resident interview and policy review the facility failed to ensure residents were assisted with shaving as needed. This affected one resident (#32) of one resident reviewed for activities of daily living. The census was 39. Findings include: Review of Resident #32's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/19/22 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's Disease, major depression and schizoaffective disorder. Review of the shower sheets revealed the resident showered: 10/27/22 shower and shave documented 01/30/23 refused to be shaved but had a shower 01/31/23 had a shower (no shave documented) 02/02/23 had a shower (no shave documented) 02/07/23 resident refused 02/09/23 had a shower (no shave documented) 02/10/23 had a shower (no shave documented) 02/13/23 refused three times Review of the activity of daily living for personal hygiene electronic health record documentation revealed the resident required independence to limited assistance with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure residents with orders for constipation treatment were assessed and provided intervention. This affected two residents (#23 and #24) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 39. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #23's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of type two diabetes, unilateral primary osteoarthritis, and essential hypertension. Review of Resident #23's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 Assessment, dated 01/04/23, revealed she was mildly cognitively impaired. Review of Resident #23's physician order dated 01/20/21 revealed Dulcolax suppository 10 mg insert one suppository rectally as needed for daily constipation and Milk of Magnesia Suspension (400 milligrams/5 milliliters) give 30 milliliters by mouth as needed daily for constipation, and Fleet Enema 7-19 grams/118 milliliters insert one application rectally every 24 hours as needed for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-21 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure a resident with a pressure ulcer had comprehensive pressure ulcer assessments completed to determine the status of the ulcer to include progression or healing of the ulcer and the potential need to alter treatment. This affected one resident (#11) of three residents assessed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 39. Findings included: Review of Resident #11's medical record revealed he was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included mechanical complications of other internal orthopedic devices, a non-pressure chronic ulcer of the back with necrosis of bone, paraplegia, and unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition. Review of Resident #11's Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 01/25/23, revealed he was cognitively impaired and was at risk for pressure ulcers, had a pressure ulcer, and had a Stage III unhealed pressure ulcer…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-21 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure resident's oxygen was administered as ordered. This affected one resident (#24) of two residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility census was 39. Findings included: Review of Resident #24's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/10/22 with diagnoses including encounter for other orthopedic aftercare, acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and essential hypertension. Review of Resident #24's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 01/11/23, revealed she was cognitively independent, had active diagnoses of asthma (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or chronic lung disease), respiratory failure and received oxygen. Review of Resident #24's physician order, dated 12/10/22, revealed she was to have oxygen at three liters per minute (L/min) via a nasal cannula continuously every shift for shortness of breath. Review of Resident #24's current comprehensive care plan revealed a focus of alteration in respiratory function…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-21 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, resident and staff interview the facility failed to create a comprehensive behavioral health plan to assist the resident in achieving his highest practical level of well-being while keeping the other residents safe. This affected one resident (#29) of one residents reviewed for mood and behavior. The census was 39. Findings include: Review of Resident #29's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/26/22 with diagnoses including post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder and homicidal ideations. Review of the hospital documents from 06/28/22 through 08/26/22 revealed the resident was admitted to the hospital with PTSD in addition to depressive disorder and had homicidal ideation and aggressive behavior on admission but not anymore. Review of the at risk for alteration in mood/behavior care plan- at former facility hit staff member, shaking fist in the air, secondary to potential body image concerns related to a right below the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-21 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure an attending physician reviewed the Medication Regimen Review (MRR) for pharmacy recommendations and took action on recommendations or provided a rationale if no action was taken. This affected one resident (#24) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 39. Findings included: Review of Resident #24's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/10/22 with diagnoses including encounter for other orthopedic aftercare, acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, essential hypertension, and anxiety disorder. Review of Resident #24's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 01/11/23, revealed she was cognitively independent and had an active diagnosis of anxiety. Review of Resident #24's physician order dated 12/22/22 to 01/12/23 revealed Alprazolam (Xanax, an antianxiety medication) tablet 0.25 milligram (mg) by mouth every 10 hours as needed (PRN) for anxiety. Further review of the orders dated 01/12/23…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-21 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure residents did not receive medications in excessive doses. This affected one resident (#29) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The census was 39. Findings include: Review of Resident #29's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/06/22 with diagnoses including hypertension, diabetes, homicidal ideations and bipolar disorder. Review of the physician orders revealed metoprolol succinate (antihypertensive) 50 milligrams (mg) give 50 mg daily in the morning dated 11/11/22 and metoprolol succinate 100 mg give 100 mg by mouth in the morning for elevated blood pressure dated 12/22/22. Review of the progress notes dated 12/22/22 at 12:38 P.M. revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #54 documented the resident's physician ordered metoprolol succinate 100 mg orally daily. Further review of the medical record revealed both doses of metoprolol succinate were administered concurrently since 12/23/22. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-21 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure as needed (PRN) psychoactive medications were limited to 14 days unless the attending physician documented a rationale to extend the medication. This affected one resident (#24) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 39. Findings included: Review of Resident #24's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/10/22 with diagnoses including encounter for other orthopedic aftercare, acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, essential hypertension, and anxiety disorder. Review of Resident #24's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 01/11/23, revealed she was cognitively independent and had an active diagnosis of anxiety. Review of Resident #24's physician order dated 12/22/22 to 01/12/23 revealed Alprazolam (Xanax, an antianxiety medication) tablet 0.25 milligram (mg) by mouth every 10 hours PRN for anxiety. Further review of the orders dated 01/12/23 and no stop dated revealed Alprazolam (Xanax)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-21 · tag F0773 — isolated
    Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure laboratory studies were completed per physician orders. This affected one resident (#39) of one resident reviewed for hospitalization. The census was 39. Findings include: Review of the closed medical record for Resident #39 revealed an admission date of 01/26/23 with diagnoses including encephalopathy, acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, alcoholic cirrhosis, anxiety and unspecified convulsions. Review of the five day Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment and required staff assistance with activities of daily living. Review of the progress notes dated 01/30/23 at 11:20 A.M. revealed the resident was presenting with increased confusion at times. Presents with odd behaviors and was emptying a soda bottle to make a booby trap. Continuously manipulating post-surgical drain. State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) assisting with care as much as the resident will allow. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, staff interview, policy review, the facility failed to ensure dressing changes were performed following acceptable infection control practices. This affected one (#31) of three residents observed for dressing changes. The facility's census was 39. Findings include: 1. A review of Resident #31's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included a Stage IV pressure ulcer (full thickness skin loss exposing underlying muscle, tendon, cartilage, or bone) of the coccyx. A review of Resident #31's physician's orders revealed she had an order in place for the wound to her coccyx to be packed with Alginate Silver then covered with an absorbent dressing. The treatment was to be done daily in the afternoon and as needed. The order had been in place since 01/03/23. A review of Resident #31's care plans revealed she had a care plan in place for having been admitted with actual impaired skin integrity/ Stage IV pressure ulcer to her coccyx.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2024-05-07 · tag F0680 — widespread
    Ensure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of personnel files, review of the facility assessment, and interview the facility failed to ensure the activities director was qualified. This had the potential to affect all 46 residents residing in the building. Findings included: Review of the undated facility assessment revealed Activity Director (AD) #363 was listed as the facility Activity Director. Review of AD #363's personnel file revealed the AD was hired on 06/13/23 and signed the activity director job description on 06/15/23. The job description indicated the qualifications for the AD were to be a qualified therapeutic recreation specialist or and activities professional who was licensed by the state and is eligible for certification as recreation specialist or as an activities professional or must have two year experience in a social or recreation program within the last five years, one of which was a full-time in a patient activities program in a health care setting; or must have completed a training course approved by the state. Further review of AD #363 personnel file revealed no evidence the AD met…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CONTINUING HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.1-0.1 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 51.8+0.2 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.8-0.8 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.3+0.7 vs chain
The other 11 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.1★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
BUNNER, MICHAELIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER5%since 11/18/2011
MALLETT, CHRISTOPHERIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER25%since 01/01/2013
PARSONS, BENJAMINIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL20%since 01/01/2013
SPRENGER, MARKIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER25%since 01/01/2014
SPRENGER, TIMOTHYIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER25%since 01/01/2013
CONTINUING HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/01/2012

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$4.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-8.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$227K
Related-party expense4% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 39%Medicare 3%Other / private 58%

This home reported $227K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$228per resident / day
operating cost
$6,933per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$210per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 366130. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-10, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next