No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Jan Frances Care Center

815 North Country Club Road, Ada, OK 74820 · For profit - Corporation · 132 certified beds · (580) 332-5328 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuseResident-funds citation (F0565)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)5 immediate-jeopardy citations$13,733 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Aug 2025
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • inspectors cited 5 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (41) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $13,733 in federal fines (most recent 2025-08-01)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (57%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 1 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1007 N Country Club Rd · (580) 421-8700 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1800 Arlington St · (580) 279-1416 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
ALDI0.7 mi
1320 Lonnie Abbott Blvd · (855) 955-2534 · Call to confirm hours
Park
123 E Main St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1930 Arlington St · (580) 332-3651

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 1 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased27.3%13.6%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight1.3%3.3%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder3.0%1.9%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection23.1%2.8%2.0%check this — see note marked dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms5.7%3.4%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained1.1%0.1%0.1%worse
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury6.2%4.7%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened9.8%13.7%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication29.1%25.7%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.6%94.6%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.6%4.7%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control13.1%17.1%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table42.0%17.5%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication3.6%1.8%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission26.6%27.3%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit24.0%16.6%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.442.311.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days5.802.961.80worse

This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

12.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.21U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.12hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 24% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.0%CMS range 8.6–16.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified91.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.621.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.36
RN hours/ resident / day
0.78
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.92
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.06
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.35
RN hoursweekends
56.8%
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 132 beds and averages 44.5 residents a day — about 34% occupied, or roughly 88 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.06 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.36 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.92 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.70 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.20 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.36 to 0.35 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 57% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

1
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-01-09)
1
at the previous standard inspection (2023-12-07)

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

41 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 26 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2025-08-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY On 07/28/25 at 4:01 p.m., the Oklahoma State Department of Health was notified and verified the existence of an immediate jeopardy situation related to the facility's failure to provide supervision and interventions to prevent resident-to-resident abuse. Resident #1 and Resident #2 became involved in an altercation over cigarettes on 07/19/25. Resident #1 hit Resident #2 with a wet floor sign, causing a fracture to Resident #2's left arm. The facility did not implement interventions to prevent another incident. On 07/27/25, Resident #1 and Resident #4 were involved in an altercation over cigarettes which resulted in the residents slapping each other. No interventions or additional supervision were implemented to prevent another resident-to-resident altercation. On 07/28/25 at 4:11 p.m., the administrator was notified of the immediate jeopardy and was provided the immediate jeopardy template. On 07/30/25 at 12:16 p.m., an acceptable plan of removal was approved by the Oklahoma State Department of Health. The plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2022-09-19 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY On [DATE], an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to exist related to the facility's failure to designate a registered nurse to serve as DON on a full-time basis and ensure a registered nurse served in the facility for at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week to assess residents and provide oversight for facility staff. Res #152 admitted to the facility from the hospital on [DATE] for skilled nursing services. Res #152's medical records did not document an admission assessment, skilled services progress notes, ADL documentation, meal or fluid intake, completed medication administration record, vital signs, or ongoing assessment of resident status. There was no registered nurse or DON to manage staff or provide oversight to ensure these tasks were completed seven days per week from [DATE] to [DATE]. Res #152 expired in the facility four days after admission. On [DATE] at 1:13 p.m., the Oklahoma State Department of Health was notified and verified the existence of the IJ situation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · K2022-09-19 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY On [DATE], an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to exist related to the facility's failure ensure residents were free of significant medication errors. Res #152 admitted to the facility on [DATE] for skilled nursing services with orders including midodrine (a medication that raises blood pressure) 10 mg three times daily. Medication administration records documented Res #152 did not receive this medication at any time during his admission. Res #152 expired in the facility four days after admission. During the course of the investigation, five additional residents (#3, 14, 34, 40, and #56) were found to have significant medication errors. On [DATE] at 1:13 p.m., the Oklahoma State Department of Health was notified and verified the existence of the IJ situation related to a significant medication error for Res #152 On [DATE] at 1:19 p.m., the administrator was notified of the IJ situation. On [DATE] at 9:32 a.m., an acceptable plan of removal was submitted to the Oklahoma State Department of Health.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2022-09-19 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY On [DATE], an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to exist related to the facility's failure to ensure residents were free from neglect. Res #152 admitted to the facility from the hospital on [DATE] for skilled nursing services. Res #152's medical records did not document an admission assessment, skilled services progress notes, ADL documentation, meal or fluid intake, completed medication administration record, vital signs, or ongoing assessment of resident status. Res #152 expired in the facility four days after admission. On [DATE] at 1:13 p.m., the Oklahoma State Department of Health was notified and verified the existence of the IJ situation. On [DATE] at 1:19 p.m., the administrator was notified of the IJ situation related to neglect for Res #152. On [DATE] at 9:32 a.m., an acceptable plan of removal was submitted to the Oklahoma State Department of Health. The plan of removal documented: [DATE] Jan [NAME] Care Center Plan of Removal for 4 IJs Completion Date 9-15-22 11:00 p.m. All education…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2022-09-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY On [DATE], an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to exist related to the facility's failure to assess, monitor and provide interventions for Res #152. Res #152 admitted to the facility from the hospital on [DATE] for skilled nursing services. Res #152's medical records did not document an admission assessment, skilled services progress notes, ADL documentation, meal or fluid intake, completed medication administration record, vital signs, or ongoing assessment of resident status. Res #152 expired in the facility four days after admission. On [DATE] at 1:13 p.m., the Oklahoma State Department of Health was notified and verified the existence of the IJ situation. On [DATE] at 1:19 p.m., the administrator was notified of the IJ situation related to quality of care for Res #152. On [DATE] at 9:32 a.m., an acceptable plan of removal was submitted to the Oklahoma State Department of Health. The plan of removal documented: [DATE] Jan [NAME] Care Center Plan of Removal for 4 IJs Completion Date 9-15-22…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-01 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to report an incident of misappropriation of property for 1 (#4) of 2 residents sampled for misappropriation of funds. The administrator reported two incidents of misappropriation of resident funds. Findings: An Abuse - Reportable Events policy, dated 08/2019, read in part, It is the responsibility of all facility staff to prohibit resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of resident's property in any form; and to report in accordance with the law any incident/event in which there is cause to believe a resident's physical or mental health or welfare has been or may be adversely affected by abuse, neglect and/or exploitation caused by another person .All alleged allegations of abuse will be reported to the appropriate state agency and to all other agencies as required by regulation. An OSDH incident report form, dated 06/27/25, showed a previous staff member, social services #1, had taken money from residents on two different occasions. The report listed only one resident by name and gave details of that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-07 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's emergency contact was notified of medication changes and the physician and emergency contact were notified of a change in condition for 1(#1) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for notification of change. The AIT identifed 48 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #1 had diagnoses which included painful micturition (act of urinating), personal history of urinary calculi, urinary tract infection, and anxiety disorder. A resident care plan, revised 03/17/25, showed Resident #1 had a catheter and was at increased risk for urinary tract infections. The care plan showed the resident had chronic pain. A physician's order, dated 03/18/25, showed Ativan (antianxiety medication) 0.5 mg two times a day for seven days. A physician's order, dated 03/20/25, showed pyridium (relieves symptoms caused by urinary tract infections and other urinary problems) 200 mg three times a day for seven days. A physician's order, dated 03/24/25,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-07 · tag F0773 — isolated
    Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to obtain a urinalysis to detect signs of urinary infection and blood for 1 (#1) of 3 residents sampled for unnecessary medication. The AIT identified 48 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #1 had diagnoses which included urinary tract infection, personal history of urinary calci, painful Micturition (painful urination), malignant neoplasm of the prostate and kidney failure. An Encounter Note, dated 01/08/25, showed a TRUS (trans rectal ultrasound) of the prostate had been performed that day. The note showed to obtain a urinalysis to detect signs of urinary infection and blood. The note showed Resident #1 required surgical treatment. There was no documentation to show a urinalysis was obtained in Resident #1's clinical record. A resident care plan, revised 03/17/25, showed Resident #1 had a catheter and was at increased risk for urinary tract infections. On 04/07/25 at 3:27 p.m., the DON was asked to locate the urinalysis requested on the encounter note dated 01/08/25. They stated it may have been thinned…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were maintained during catheter care for 1 (#2) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for activities of daily living care for dependent residents. The AIT identified 48 residents resided at the facility. Findings: On 04/04/25 at 11:13 a.m., LPN #1 performed hand hygiene, donned gloves, gathered supplies of saline, drain sponge and another sponge, and placed then on the resident's bedside table. LPN #1 removed the old drain sponge from the suprapubic catheter and no drainage observed. LPN #1 cleaned the area, applied an ointment, covered the resident with their blanket, threw away the trash, adjusted the resident's covers, bedside table, television remote, and the resident's phone. LPN #1 did not change their gloves or perform proper hand hygiene during the performance of catheter care. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included painful micturition (act of urinating), personal history of urinary calculi, urinary tract infection, and anxiety disorder. A resident care plan, revised…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent elopement for 1 (#1) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for elopement. The assistant administrator reported 50 residents resided in the facility. The facility elopement book identified four residents at risk for elopement. Findings: A policy titled Wandering, Unsafe Resident, dated 12/01/08, read in part, The facility will strive to prevent unsafe wandering while maintaining the least restrictive environment for residents who are at risk for elopement. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included dementia. An elopement risk evaluation, dated 08/19/24, showed Resident #1 was at risk for elopement. A care plan, dated 08/19/24, showed Resident #1 was an elopement risk due to ambulation status, history of elopement, dementia, and wandering. A progress note, dated 01/11/25 at 5:09 a.m., showed the resident got up through the night wandering halls, trying to go into other resident rooms, and was easily redirected. A quarterly assessment, dated 01/13/25, showed Resident #1's cognition was severly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide hot water in resident bathroom sinks for three (#12, 22, and #26) of three residents sampled for comfortable and homelike environment. The administrator reported 46 residents resided in the facility. An undated Maintenance Policy, read in parts, The facility shall complete a routine maintenance and preventive maintenance program to assure the safety and comfort of the residents. The following items shall be tested weekly .water temperature. 1. On 01/07/25 at 11:42 a.m., Resident #12 reported the water in their bathroom sink never got hot. The water was checked with the surveyor holding their hand under the running water for two minutes and the water never warmed up. On 01/09/25 at 10:04 a.m., the water temperature was rechecked in Resident #12's bathroom. After letting the hot water run for two minutes, a digital temperature reading was 68.9 degrees Fahrenheit. The resident reported maintenance staff had been in their room to check the water temperature, but nothing had changed. A maintenance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-10 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure availability of hot water for three (#7, 8, and #9) of nine sampled residents reviewed for reasonable accommodations of needs. The ADON reported 39 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Resident #7 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included encephalopathy, cerebral infarction, and pressure ulcer of left heel. Resident #7's cognition was moderately impaired. On 10/09/24 at 1:25 p.m., Resident #7 reported they could not shave in their bathroom or wash their hands without hot water. The hot water measured 72.5 degrees Fahrenheit in their bathroom sink. 2. Resident #8 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following other cerebrovascular disease affecting left non-dominant side, cerebrovascular disease, and acute appendicitis. Resident #8's cognition was intact. On 10/09/24 at 1:29 p.m., Resident #8 reported there was no hot water and they could not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-22 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — pattern
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure RN coverage for eight consecutive hours per day, seven days a week. The regional director reported 32 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A staffing policy, not dated, read in part A registered nurse will be employed full time on the day shift, with coverage seven days a week, as the facility's director of nursing service. Clinical staff time detail reports were reviewed for 04/01/24 through 05/21/24. The reports documented no RN coverage in the facility seven days a week. On 05/21/24 at 11:05 a.m., the Regional Director reported the facilty had not hired a DON since the last DON had walked out in March 2024. The Regional Director reported the corporate RN was working as the DON. On 05/22/24 at 10:55 a.m., the Regional Director reported the corporate RN worked in the facility eight hours a day, five days a week. The Regional Director reported the facility had no RN coverage on the weekends.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-22 · tag F0837 — pattern
    Establish a governing body that is legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies for managing and operating the facility and appoints a properly licensed administrator responsible for managing the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to have a licensed administrator. Findings: A Administrator policy, dated 07/01/11, read in part .Qualifications/Experience/Requirements: A current, valid state nursing home administrator license is required . The Regional Director reported 32 residents resided in the facility. The staff list provided by the Regional Director, dated 05/21/24, documented no Administrator. On 05/21/24 at 11:05 a.m., the Regional Director reported no licensed Administrator had been hired since the last Administrator walked out in March 2024. The Regional Director reported they had hired a new office staff member that would start Administrator school the first week of June. The Regional Director reported not being a licensed Administrator and was covering until the office staff member was licensed. On 05/22/24 at 10:25 a.m., the Regional Director reported the facility had submitted paperwork to name an Administrator they were operating under. The Regional Director reported the named Administrator was only used for on-call for questions and in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure housekeeping services maintained a clean environment. The ADON reported 32 residents resided in the facility. Findings: The facility Housekeeping Guideline manual, dated 01/01/05, read in part, .Daily cleaning resident rooms .Empty and clean trash cans .Dust mop floors .Damp mop floors . The facility housekeeping checklist order, provided by the Regional Director, not dated, read in part, .Daily order of housekeeping to-dos, this includes sweeping, mopping, picking up trash, making it look presentable .Front entrance/lobby .Around nursing station .Start on a hallway .Take all the trash out of the rooms on the hall .Sweep out all the rooms on the hall .Mop all the rooms on the hall .Sweep and mop the actual hallway itself . On 03/25/24 at 2:15 p.m., upon entrance to the facility, the lobby and hallway floors were observed to be dirty with brown sticky spots in multiple areas. The floors were observed to have dirt debris randomly throughout the lobby and hallways. The lobby area had a strong odor of urine. No…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 26 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received showers as scheduled for two (#3 and #6) of six residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The ADON reported 32 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Resident #3 had diagnoses which included non-traumatic brain dysfunction and metabolic encephalopathy. Resident #3's assessment, dated 02/20/24 documented cognition severly impaired and dependent on staff for bathing. Resident #3's shower sheets, provided by the Regional Director for February 2024, failed to document scheduled showers were performed for February 1st, 6th, 8th, 10th, 13th, 15th, 17th, 20th, 22nd, 24th, and 29th. Resident #3's shower sheets, provided by the Regional Director for March 2024, failed to document scheduled showers were performed for March 2nd, 5th, 7th, 9th, 16th, 19th, 21st and 23rd. Resident #3's care plan, dated 03/21/24, read in part, .Resident ADL functions: Assist x 1 staff with bathing . The facility's shower schedule, dated 03/26/24, documented resident #3's showers were scheduled on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain housekeeping services necessary to provide a clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. The Administrator reported 27 residents resided in the facility. Findings: The facility Housekeeping Service Policy, not dated, documented in part, .the facility shall be maintained in a clean, sanitary, orderly and attractive condition .daily room care shall be provided for each resident of the facility .deep cleaning of resident rooms will be performed on schedule .floors shall be maintained in clean and safe condition .housekeeping employees will be available to assist with spills and other accidents throughout the day . On 12/03/23 at 4:00 p.m., a tour of the facility was conducted. The floors in the lobby and all hallways were observed to be dirty with brownish-black spots observed in several areas, as well as trash and general debris on the floors. Resident rooms were observed to be cluttered with trash on the floors and cluttered bedside tables. No housekeeping staff was observed in the building. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-09-19 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to have an effective administration to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. The facility failed to ensure: a. residents were not in common areas of the facility while wearing hospital gowns instead of appropriate clothing and foot coverings. b. grievances presented during resident council meetings were acted on or provide rationale as to why concerns could not be met. c. advanced directives (Do Not Resuscitate) were completed to include the required signatures. d. residents were free from neglect. e. resident assessments accurately reflected the resident status. f. a registered nurse reviewed, dated, signed, and transmitted the resident assessments to CMS when completed. g. baseline care plans were intimated and to provide a copy of the care plan to residents and/or their representatives. h. comprehensive care plans were developed which reflected the residents' current status. i. ensure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-09-19 · tag F0850 — failed to provide social-work services — widespread
    Hire a qualified full-time social worker in a facility with more than 120 beds.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to employ the services of a qualified social worker on a full time basis. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 53 resident resided in the facility. Findings: On 09/12/22 the corporate director provided a copy of the work schedules of all departments in the facility for review. The work schedules did not document a social worker. On 09/14/22 at 2:03 p.m., the SSD reported she was not a qualified social worker. The SSD stated she had been in the position since April of 2022. On 09/14/22 at 2:28 p.m., the administrator stated the facility had 138 licensed beds. The administrator stated the facility did not have a qualified social worker on staff. On 09/15/22 at 10:26 a.m., during the resident council meeting, residents in attendance reported they were not informed of physician appointments until shortly prior to the departure time. The residents stated they felt very rushed.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-09-19 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to act upon grievances presented during resident council meetings or provide rationale as to why concerns could not be met. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report documented 53 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Resident council minutes were reviewed for 12/01/21, 05/13/22, 06/23/22, and 08/18/22, which were all of the meeting minutes provided for review for the last 12 months. There was no documentation the residents' grievances had been acted upon. On 09/15/22 at 10:26 a.m., a resident council meeting was conducted in the activity room. Five residents attended the meeting. The ombudsman was present. No staff were present during the meeting. During the meeting, residents stated that they were not sure who the grievance official was but they thought it was the administrator. They stated none of the staff, including the administrator, ever responded to their concerns or gave a reason as to why the concerns were not addressed. On 09/15/22 at 12:00 p.m., the administrator was shown the grievances on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-09-19 · tag F0642 — pattern
    Ensure a qualified health professional conducts resident assessments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure a registered nurse (RN) coordinated, signed, and transmitted the resident assessments to CMS when completed for three (#2, #6, and #3) of three residents reviewed for assessments over 120 days. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 53 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: 1. A quarterly assessment, dated 07/04/22, was reviewed as in progress for Res #2. The assessment administration page documented the MDS coordinator #1 signed the areas she completed. There was no RN signature for the assessment completion. 2. An annual assessment, dated 08/09/22, was reviewed as in process for Res #6. The assessment administration page documented the MDS coordinator #1 signed the areas she completed. There was no RN signature for the assessment completion. On 09/16/22 at 4:44 p.m., the MDS coordinator #1 stated the assessments were waiting on the signature from the corporate RN. MDS coordinator #1 stated the MDSs were completed just waiting on RN signature to transmit them. The MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-09-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan which reflected the residents' current status for four, (#14, 51, 56, and #60) of 20 residents whose records were reviewed. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 53 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Res #51 had diagnoses which included chronic congestive heart failure, diabetes mellitus, and severe protein calorie malnutrition. An admission assessment, dated 05/28/22, documented Res #51 was severely impaired in cognition, required supervision to limited assistance with ADLs, and did not walk. On 06/22/22 a discharge return not anticipated assessment was completed. Res #51's clinical records were found to not document a comprehensive care plan. On 09/16/22 at 1:16 p.m., the MDS coordinator confirmed she had not developed a comprehensive care plan for Res #51. 2. An admission assessment for Res #56, dated 09/03/22, documented the resident was intact in cognition…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-09-19 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents' care plans were reviewed and updated and failed to ensure the resident and/or representative participation in the care plan process for three (#8, 24, and #34) of twenty residents whose records were reviewed for care planning. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 53 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Res #8 had diagnoses which included COVID-19, urinary tract infection, and schizophrenia. An admission assessment, dated 05/22/22, documented Res #8 was severely impaired in cognition and required supervision to limited assistance with ADLs and had not fallen. Nurse notes, dated 08/01/22, documented Res #8 complained of rib pain after a self reported fall in the dining room. The notes documented the staff were unaware the resident had fallen. The notes documented an X-ray was obtained for Res #8. The notes documented the residents ribs were negative for fracture. The notes documented the primary care provider and family were notified. The notes did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-09-19 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident with an indwelling catheter received the appropriate care and services to prevent urinary tract infections for three (#8, 45, and #56) of three residents reviewed for indwelling urinary catheters. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented six residents with indwelling or external catheters. Findings: A facility policy titled Catheter Care, Urinary, revised in 2010, read in parts, .2. Maintain an accurate record of the resident's daily output, per facility policy and procedure .The following information should be recorded in the resident's medical record: 1. The date and time that catheter care was given . 1. Resident #8 was admitted with diagnoses which included benign prostatic hyperplasia with lower urinary tract symptoms and urinary tract infection. A care plan, dated 05/10/22, documented the resident had the potential for urinary complications related to having a suprapubic catheter. It documented a goal of the resident would not have signs and/or symptoms of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-09-19 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure respiratory orders were followed for one (#5) of one resident sampled for respiratory care. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented eight residents who received respiratory treatments. Findings: Res #5 had diagnoses which included acute respiratory disease. A care plan, dated 01/20/22, documented Res #5 has episodes of shortness of breath and was at risk for respiratory distress/failure for COVID -19. The care plan did not document what liter O2 was to be administered. The care plan documented to apply O2 as ordered and encourage the resident to take slow deep breaths. Physician orders dated, 02/13/22, documented O2 at 2 liters via nasal cannula continuous to maintain O2 sat of 90%, record O2 sat every shift, and to document, date, and change the O2 tubing weekly on Sunday night shift. A review of the resident's TAR for July 2022, had six days where the resident's oxygen sat was not documented. There were two times the oxygen tubing was not documented as changed for July. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-09-19 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to assess and monitor for pain every shift according to the plan of care for one (#40) of one resident reviewed for pain. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 53 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: Res #40 had diagnoses which included chronic pain. Physician orders, dated 08/05/22, documented acetaminophen 325 mg give two every eight hours PRN mild pain or fever, Lyrica 100 mg one every day, and tramadol 50 mg give one every eight hours PRN for pain. A five day assessment, dated 08/09/22, documented the resident was intact with cognition, required extensive assistance with ADLs, and had pain he rated at a 10 which make it hard to sleep. The assessment documented the resident did not receive copious during the assessment period. A care plan, last reviewed 08/17/22. documented the resident had chronic pain, to administer medications as ordered, and to monitor and record any complaints of pain, location, frequency, effect on function, intensity, alleviating factors, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-09-19 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to perform ongoing assessment and oversight of the resident after dialysis treatments for one (#49) of one resident sampled for dialysis. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented two residents resided in the facility who required dialysis. Findings: Resident #49 had diagnoses which included end stage renal disease, peripheral vascular disease, hypertension, diabetes, and noncompliance with renal dialysis. A physician order, dated 08/16/22, documented the resident was to receive dialysis treatments Monday, Wednesday, and Friday at 6:40 a.m. A dialysis communication form, dated 08/17/22, documented no information under Resident Specific Post-Dialysis Information (completed by facility upon return). The document had spaces to record vital signs, pain, status of access graft/catheter upon return, if bruit/thrill present, if resident returned with any orders, if the resident was offered a meal upon return, medications…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-09-19 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — pattern
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to monitor blood pressure before administering medications for one (#45) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report documented 53 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #45 was admitted with diagnoses which included congestive heart failure, hypertension, and end-stage renal disease. A care plan, dated 02/25/19, documented to administer medications as ordered and to evaluate, record, and report effectiveness and adverse side effects of medications. A physician's order, dated 01/20/22, documented to administer carvedilol 12.5 mg orally twice a day and isosorbide mononitrate 30 mg orally once a day for a diagnosis of hypertension. Both orders documented to hold the medication if the systolic blood pressure was less than 100 and/or the diastolic blood pressure was less than 60. The July 2022 MAR documented carvedilol 12.5 mg was administered on 07/15/22, 07/16/22, and 07/17/22 without documentation of a blood pressure reading.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-09-19 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to monitor for behaviors and side effects related to psychotropic medications for five (#3, 5, 25, 34, and #40) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary psychotropic medications. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report documented 38 residents received psychotropic medications. Findings: 1. Resident #25 was admitted with diagnoses which included hydrocephalus, pseudobulbar affect, generalized anxiety disorder, visual hallucinations, and, psychotic disorder with delusions due to known physiological condition. An admission assessment, dated 04/12/22, documented the resident had disorganized thinking that changes in severity and behavioral symptoms not directed toward others (e.g., physical symptoms such as hitting or scratching self, pacing, rummaging, public sexual acts, disrobing in public, throwing or smearing food or bodily wastes, or verbal/vocal symptoms like screaming, disruptive sounds). A physician's order, dated 06/13/22, documented to observe resident closely for significant side effects…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-09-19 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate below five percent for two (#14 and #42) of five residents observed during medication pass. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 53 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An undated facility policy, titled Documentation of Medication Administration read in part, .Administration of medication must be documented immediately after (never before) it is given . An undated facility policy, titled Medication Errors and Drug Reactions read in part, .Report all medication errors and drug reactions immediately to the attending physician, Director of Nursing Service and Administrator . An undated facility policy, titled Self-Administration of Drugs read in parts, .the staff and practitioner will assess each resident's mental and physical abilities, to determine whether a resident is capable of self-administering medications .In addition to general evaluation of decision-making capacity,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-09-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure expired supplies and medications were disposed of. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 53 residents resided in the facility. Findings: On 09/16/22 at 8:19 a.m., a tour of the medication room was conducted. The following expired medications and supplies were observed in the medication room: - one opened 100 unit/1 ml insulin needle without safety mechanism - two opened exactamed 5 ml oral syringes - one Medtronic quick-set expired 06/2010 - one quarter full bottle of rubbing alcohol expired 05/2016 - one 22 g/1 inch BD angiocath IV catheter expired 10/2019 - one 18 g/1.16 inch BD insyte autoguard BC winged IV catheter expired 09/30/2020 - one silicone latex covered Foley catheter 24 fr 30 ml expired 10/12/2021 - one Dynarex IV administration set expired 01/27/2022 - one opened bottle Nutricia Pro-stat sugar free complete 30 fl oz bottle expired 03/03/2022 - one open tube of Zim's max freeze pro formula cold therapy cooling gel expired 06/2022 - one Medical Action Industries central line…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-09-19 · tag F0801 — pattern
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the person designated to serve as the DM had a current certification. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 53 residents who resided in the facility with two resident who received tube feedings. Findings: The Association of Nutrition & Foodservice Professionals website documented CDM CFPP credential read in part, .you will also need to maintain it by completing and reporting continuing education as well as paying the annual certification fee .Certificants must comply with all recertification requirements to maintain use of the credential . On 09/15/22 at 10:10 a.m. the DM was asked if he was current with his dietary manager training. The DM stated he did not have a current certificate of training. He stated he let it lapse. On 09/16/22 at 11:25 a.m., the DM presented a certificate for certified Dietary Manager, dated 10/11/14. On 09/19/22 at 11:23 a.m., during a meeting with the administrator and the corporate director, the corporate director stated she was unaware of the requirement to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-09-19 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide food which was palatable and at a safe and appetizing temperature. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form identified 53 residents who resided in the facility. The corporate director, documented the facility did not have any residents who were NPO. Findings: 1. On 09/12/22 at 5:02 p.m., corn dogs were observed on the steam table. The corn dogs were observed to have been burnt and split open. On 09/12/22 at 5:13 p.m., an observation was made of 13 meals in disposable boxes which were sitting on an open cart in the hall way. The other meals were observed in a hot box on the hall. On 09/12/22 at 5:34 p.m., three meals were observed to have been brought out of the kitchen on an open cart and placed in the hall. One cover on one of the meals was observed to have not been on properly and the macaroni and cheese was not covered. On 09/12/22 at 5:37 p.m., hospitality aide #1 was observed to place the tray in the warmer. On 09/13/22 at 10:26 a.m., Res #23 stated the food was not good. She stated it was never hot…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-09-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared, stored, and distributed in a sanitary manner. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 53 residents resided in the facility. The corporate director documented all residents receive food from the kitchen. Findings: 1. On 09/12/22 at 5:13 p.m., CNA #4 was observed while delivering meals to resident rooms. CNA #4 was observed to use the bed controller to sit the head of the bed up, then returned to cart for another meal, placed a drink on the meal tray, and delivered the meal to another resident room. The CNA was observe to serve meals to five resident rooms without performing hand hygiene. At 5:18 p.m. CNA #4 was observed to shut a resident door, returned to the food cart, pour a cup of coffee, pulled up his pants, and then delivered another meal without performing hygiene. At 5:23 p.m., CNA #4 was observed to use his right hand and push a resident in a wheel chair while he delivered a meal tray to separate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-09-19 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents' medical records were complete, readily accessible, and systematically organized for three, (#8, 56, and #152) of 20 residents whose records were reviewed. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 53 resident resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Resident #152 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including interstitial pulmonary disease, acute respiratory failure with hypercapnia, COPD, atherosclerotic heart disease, history of TIA and cerebral infarction, acute kidney failure, hydronephrosis with renal and ureteral calculus obstruction, muscle weakness, and dementia. An LTC -admission Assessment/Observation Documentation form, dated 08/22/22, had no resident observations or assessments documented. A MAR, dated 08/01/22 to 08/21/22, documented diclofenac 1% topical, apply two grams to affected area four times daily. There were no documented administrations of this medication. A respiratory flowsheet,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were not in common areas of the facility while wearing hospital gowns instead of appropriate clothing and foot coverings for one (#31) of one residents reviewed for dignity. The Residents Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 53 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An undated facility policy, titled Loss of Personal Items Policy, read in parts, .In the event an item [sic] is lost or misplaced, the staff or president will report the loss to the administrator immediately .A complete survey of the facility will be make [sic] to locate the item if misplaced .In the even the item is not found and the resident so requests, the loss will be reported to the local police department . Resident #31 had diagnoses which included cerebral infarction, hemiplegia/hemiparesis affecting left non-dominant side, depression, and chronic pain. An admission MDS, dated [DATE], documented the resident was cognitively intact,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-19 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure advanced directives (Do Not Resuscitate) were completed to include the required signatures for one (#7) of one sampled resident who was reviewed for advanced directives. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 53 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: Res #7 had diagnoses which included cognitive communication deficit. A quarterly assessment, dated 08/13/22, documented the resident was moderately impaired with cognition and required limited assistance with most activities of daily living. Review of the medical record for Res #7 documented their code status as Do Not Resuscitate. The DNR form contained a printed name in the signature of POA and beside the printed name was documented gave verbal agree over phone and a phone number. The DNR was dated 04/07/20 and signed by two witnesses. The medical record did not contain any POA paperwork for Res #7. On 09/15/22 at 9:20 a.m. the BOM stated Res #7 had a POA who was supposed to bring in the POA paperwork to the facility. The BOM stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-19 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident assessments accurately reflected the resident status for one (#56) of 20 residents whose assessments were reviewed. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 53 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Res #56 had diagnoses which included diabetes mellitus. A physician order, dated 08/31/22, documented the facility was to administer Levemir (a long acting insulin) 60 units SQ twice daily. A physician order, dated 08/31/22, documented the facility was to administer Novolog (a short acting insulin) 25 units, SQ before meals. An MDS admission assessment, dated 09/03/22, documented Res #56 was intact in cognition and required limited to total assistance with ADLs. The assessment documented Res #56 had a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. The assessment documented no insulin was administered during the assessment period. On 09/13/22 at 2:54 p.m., Res #56 was observed in her room sitting at the bedside. She stated she had to go the hospital recently due to the facility giving…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-19 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to initiate a baseline care plan and provide a copy of the care plan to one (#60) of 20 residents whose records were reviewed. The new resident Roster/Sample Matrix documented seven residents were admitted in the previous 30 days. Findings: Res #60 had diagnoses which included orthopedic aftercare, pathological fracture, diabetes mellitus, and chronic kidney disease. A review of Res #60's admission orders documented the facility was to administer 14 different medications, three separate treatments, a diet order, and an order for physical therapy, occupational therapy, and speech therapy. On 09/14/22 at 9:12 a.m., Res #60 was observed sitting in a wheelchair in her room. Res #60 stated she did not receive a baseline care plan. She stated she was put in bed and left. On 09/15/22 at 12:47 p.m., the MDS coordinator reviewed Res #60's clinical records and stated the records did not document a baseline care plan was completed. The MDS coordinator stated when a resident was admitted and the initial assessment was done,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's fall was investigated and steps to prevent recurrence of falls were initiated for one (#8) of one resident sampled for falls. The Corporate Director of Operations reported 41 residents fell in the previous six months. Findings: Res #8 had diagnoses which included COVID-19, urinary tract infection, and schizophrenia. An admission assessment, dated 05/22/22, documented Res #8 was severely impaired in cognition and required supervision to limited assistance with ADLs and had not fallen. Nurse notes, dated 08/01/22, documented Res #8 complained of rib pain after a self reported fall in the dining room. The notes documented the staff were unaware the resident had fallen. The notes documented an X-ray was obtained for Res #8. The notes documented the resident's ribs were negative for fracture. The notes documented the primary care provider and family were notified. The notes did not document steps to prevent recurrence of falls. A care plan, last reviewed on 08/28/22, documented Res #8 had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-19 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's nutritional preference was accommodated and provide substitutions for food dislikes for one (#23) of four residents reviewed for food. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 53 residents resided in the facility. The corporate director documented all residents receive food from the kitchen. Findings: Res #23 had diagnoses which included paraplegia, hypoglycemia, cognitive communication defect, GERD, and other specified disorders of teeth and supporting structures. A 5-day MDS assessment, dated 07/06/22, documented the resident was cognitively intact. On 09/16/22 at 11:13 a.m., Res #23 stated the facility did not bring other sides if she did not want what was served. She stated her dietary card documented she did eat fish but when she had told the staff in the past she did not want fish they did not provide her with a substitution. She stated she kept food in her personal freezer and would have to wait for staff to finish with everyone else before they would assist…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$13,733 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $13,733 — penalty dated 2025-08-01

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to BGM ESTATE — 15 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 51.8-0.8 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.1-1.1 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.1-0.1 vs chain
Quality measures 1 of 52.5-1.5 vs chain
The other 14 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.8★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
BGM ESTATE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST38%since 12/29/2020
GILBERT F. GREEN TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST25%since 12/29/2020
PHILIP M. GREEN REVOCABLE TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST25%since 12/29/2020
MITCHELL, KELLYIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST13%since 12/29/2020
MITCHELL, MARCINDAIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST9%since 12/29/2020
MITCHELL, ROBERTIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST9%since 12/29/2020
TABOR, ANGELAIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST9%since 12/29/2020
SIMMONS, PHILLIPIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 12/29/2020
TAYLOR, SANDRAIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 12/29/2020
MORGAN, MICHAELIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 12/29/2020

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$3.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-7.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$357K
Related-party expense10% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 73%Medicare 14%Other / private 14%

About 73% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $357K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 10% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$280per resident / day
operating cost
$8,516per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$261per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OK

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Oklahoma Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Oklahoma
$7,026/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,756/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,150/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 375243. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-01-09, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next