Parkhill North Nursing Home

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.19 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 19% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 38% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 65 beds and averages 40.6 residents a day — about 62% occupied, or roughly 24 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.39 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.51 on weekdays — 3% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.29 to 0.24 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2025-12-18 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — pattern
  Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure labs were obtained as ordered by the physician for 2 (#33 and #5) of 5 sampled residents whose labs were reviewed.The DON identified 37 residents had lab orders.Findings:1.A policy titled Lab and Diagnostic Test Results-Clinical Protocol, dated November 2018, read in part, 1. The physician will identify and order diagnostic and lab testing based on the resident's diagnostic and monitoring needs. 2. The staff will process test requisitions and arrange for tests.A physician order, dated 04/11/25, showed Resident #33 was to have a CBC and CMP every six months in April and October.A quarterly assessment, dated 10/31/25, showed Resident #33 had a BIMS score of 2, which indicated the resident was severely impaired in cognition for daily decision making, and did not have any pressure ulcers.A care plan, revised 10/31/25, showed the resident was at risk for pressure ulcers, did not currently have any pressure ulcers, and to monitor labs as ordered by the physician.Review of the clinical record did not show labs had been…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-12-18 · tag F0801 — pattern
  Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to employ a full-time dietary manager and have competent kitchen staff assigned to perform the duties of cook and/or dietary aide. The DON identified 39 residents received meals prepared in the kitchen. Findings: On 12/09/25 at 10:50 a.m., there was no dietary manager observed in the kitchen.On 12/09/25 at 1:30 p.m., there was no dietary manager observed in the kitchen.On 12/10/25 at 10:30 a.m., there was no dietary manager observed in the kitchen. A hospice aide entered the kitchen without a hair net or hair cover and scooped ice from a cooler located in the center of the kitchen. [NAME] #1 and cook #2 were present, but neither corrected the hospice aide nor offered them a hair net. On 12/10/25 at 4:40 p.m., there was no dietary manager observed in the kitchen. Dietary Ade #1 stepped onto the top of an open box of russet potatoes located on the bottom shelf of the food preparation table in the center of the kitchen. The dietary aide tied their shoe before returning their foot/shoe to the floor. On 12/15/25 at 9:20 a.m., there…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-12-18 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide meals according to the menu approved by the registered dietician for two of two observed meal services. The DON identified 39 residents ate meals prepared in the kitchen and cook #1 identified six residents received pureed diets.Findings:On 12/15/25 at 9:20 a.m., cook #1 was observed pureeing canned carrots. [NAME] #1 slid a butter knife back and forth between the blender housing and the cover until the safety engaged and the blender started. On 12/15/25 at 11:10 a.m., cook #1 was observed pureeing prepared lasagna. [NAME] #1 slid a butter knife back and forth between the blender housing and the cover until the safety engaged and the blender started. On 12/15/25 at 11:50 a.m., cook #1 was observed plating a pureed diet plate with pureed lasagna, carrots, and a whipped dessert. There was no breadstick/bread served. On 12/15/25 at 6:20 p.m., there was a half a loaf of white bread observed in a package sitting on top of the toaster. Dietary Aide #1 was in the kitchen. An unidentified CNA requested a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to:a. ensure hair restraints were used by individuals entering the kitchen;b. ensure the integrity of the kitchen environment was free of breaks/holes; c. ensure leftover foods were stored according to standards of practice;d. ensure the kitchen staff followed infection control standards of practice;e. ensure the ice machine was kept clean; andf. ensure food was served according to standards of practice.The DON identified 39 residents ate meals prepared in the kitchen. Findings: On 12/09/25 at 10:50 a.m., the following observations were made in the kitchen: a. a metal pipe of a type used as an electrical conduit, exited the ceiling through a hole which was not sealed around the metal. There was also another quarter size hole in the ceiling six inches from the pipe. The hole had two white wires hanging through the quarter size hole. The hole was not sealed around the two wires,b. a partially painted over bell was hanging loosely from the ceiling. There was electrical wiring and a screw exposed between the base of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-12-18 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
  Keep all essential equipment working safely.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a commercial blender in working order for the preparation of puree meals. [NAME] #1 identified six residents ate puree meals prepared in the kitchen. Findings: On 12/15/25 at 9:20 a.m., cook #1 was observed to pour canned carrots into the bowl of a blender, placed a broken cover onto the bowl, and used a butter knife to engage the safety and start the blender. [NAME] #1 was observed to blend the canned carrots and lasagna utilizing the bowl with broken cover and a butter knife to engage the safety and start the blender. The cover to the blender bowl was observed to be cracked in several places and the plastic portion which locked the blender bowl in place was missing and appeared to have broken off. On 12/15/25 at 9:19 a.m., cook #1 stated the top to the blender they used to puree foods was broken and they had to work the safety with a butter knife to get the blender to work. [NAME] #1 stated the office had ordered another top for the blender.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-12-18 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — pattern
  Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure routine inspection of a resident bed and side rails were conducted for 1 (#18) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for accident hazards.The DON identified six residents used side rails.Findings:On 12/09/25 at 12:06 p.m., Resident #18 was observed lying in their bed with their eyes closed. On each side of the bed, around the resident's shoulder and head, a quarter side rail was observed attached to the bed frame and in the up position.On 12/12/25 at 3:18 p.m., Resident #18 was observed lying in bed with their eyes closed. The bilateral quarter rails on the resident's bed located around the resident's shoulders and head were in the up position.On 12/16/25 at 10:37 a.m., Resident #18 was observed lying in their bed with their eyes open. The two bed rails attached to the resident's bed frame were in the up position.A MDS annual assessment, dated 11/07/25, showed in Section C Resident #18 had a BIMS score of 13 which indicated the resident's cognition was intact and suggested normal memory and thinking…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident did not receive an antipsychotic medication for the diagnosis of dementia for 1 (#10) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications.The DON identified 11 residents received antipsychotic medications.Findings:A facility policy titled Monitoring of Anti-Psychotics, dated 2025, showed residents were only to be prescribed antipsychotic medications if one of the listed diagnoses in the policy were used. The list in the policy did not include any form of dementia.A physician's order, dated 11/19/25, showed Resident #10 was to be administer quetiapine (an antipsychotic medication) one tablet of 25 mg once every morning for the diagnosis of vascular dementia, unspecified severity, with agitation.A physician's order, dated 11/19/25, showed Resident #10 was to be administer quetiapine (an antipsychotic medication) one tablet of 50 mg once every bedtime for the diagnosis of vascular dementia, unspecified severity, with agitation.A medication administration record for Resident #43, dated December 2025,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure assessments were accurate for 1 (#5) of 14 sampled residents whose assessments were reviewed.The DON identified 39 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A medication administration record, dated July 2025, showed Resident #5 was ordered lorazepam (an anxiolytic medication) 1mg every four hours as needed for anxiety from 07/02/25 through 07/16/25. The medication administration record, showed Resident #5 had received lorazepam 1mg on 07/15/25 at 9:26 p.m. The medication administration record showed Resident #5 was ordered and received divalproex (an anticonvulsant medication) 125mg daily from 07/01/25 through 07/16/25. A quarterly assessment, dated 07/15/25, showed a staff assessment for cognition revealed Resident #5 was severely impaired in cognition for daily decision making, had not received an antianxiety medication or an anticonvulsant medication during the seven-day look back period. An annual assessment, dated 10/09/25, showed a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was developed for 1 (#19) of 14 sampled residents whose care plans were reviewed. The DON identified 39 residents resided in the facility.Findings:The admission assessment, dated 06/20/25, showed Resident #19 had been admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had a BIMS score of 13, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision making.Review of the clinical record did not show a baseline care plan had been completed for Resident #19. On 12/18/25 at 11:02 a.m., MDS coordinator #1 stated they or the ADON completed baseline care plans. They reviewed the electronic clinical record and the paper chart and stated the ADON may know where the baseline care plan was located for Resident #19. On 12/18/25 at 11:09 a.m., the ADON stated they completed baseline care plans for residents. The ADON reviewed the electronic clinical record and stated they had not completed a baseline care plan for Resident #19 within 48…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident assessed to be at risk for wandering and elopement had a problem, goals, and interventions in their care plan for wandering and elopement for 1 (#43) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for accident hazards.The DON identified two residents were at risk of wandering.Findings:An MDS admission assessment, dated 12/01/24, showed in Section C under staff assessment, Resident #43's cognition was moderately impaired. In Section E of the assessment, it showed the resident experienced delusions and wandered one to three days in the previous seven days.A quarterly wandering/elopement assessment, performed by LPN #4 on 09/02/25, showed the answers to the questions: Is the resident resistant to being placed in facility, does the resident have a history of wandering, is the resident confused and disoriented, and are there any indications of dementia, were answered yes. According to the instructions printed on the assessment, one yes answer to any of the questions required the resident be put on wandering / elopement…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to BGM ESTATE — 15 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 80% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $278K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OK