Calera Manor

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

39.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 167 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 48.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 64 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.36 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 61% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 25% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 82 beds and averages 78.6 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.26 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.13 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.47 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 1.91 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.40 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.14 to 0.11 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
  Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an RN was on duty for 8 consecutive hours per day. The DON identified 74 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: A PBJ Staffing Data Report, dated 01/01/25 through 03/31/25 (the second quarter of fiscal year 2025), showed the facility did not have RN coverage on 44 of the 90 days in that quarter. Below are the dates identified as not having RN coverage in January, February, and March 2025. a. January 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th, 9th, 10th, 11th, 12th, 13th, 14th, 15th, 16th, 17th, 18th, 19th, 20th, 21st, 22nd, 23rd, 24th, 25th, 26th, 27th, 28th, 29th, 30th, and 31st. b. February 2nd, 8th, 9th, 15th, 22nd, and 23rd. c. March 2nd, 15th, 16th, 22nd, 23rd, 29th, and 30th. On 06/10/25 at 1:46 p.m., the DON stated the facility did not have documentation of RN coverage for the dates listed on the facility's PBJ report. They stated the facility did not have registered nurses available to cover on those dates.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-06-12 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — pattern
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents did not receive antipsychotic medications for the diagnosis of dementia for 2 (#14 and #25) of 6 sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The DON stated 22 residents were prescribed antipsychotic medications at the facility. 1. A significant change MDS assessment, dated 03/09/25, showed in section C Res #14 had a BIMS score of 3 [this indicated the resident's cognition was severely impaired]. A policy titled Antipsychotic Medication Use, dated April 2007, read in part, Residents will only receive antipsychotic medications when necessary to treat specific conditions for which they are indicated and effective. A prescription order, dated 03/04/25, showed Res #14 had been prescribed one tablet of Seroquel [an antipsychotic medication] 50 mg every day for dementia with mood disturbance. A prescription order, dated 05/16/25, showed Res #14 had been prescribed one tablet of Risperdal [an antipsychotic medication] 1 mg each day for dementia with mood disturbance. On 06/11/25 at 2:42 p.m., the ADON…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the physician of a significant weight change for 1 (#71) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for nutrition. A weight variance report, dated 06/09/25, showed 4 residents with significant weight loss. Findings: An undated facility policy titled Weight and Height Measurement, read in part, Notify the charge nurse or physician of all weight changes of five pounds (or 5%) or more in a 30-day period or ten percent in a 180-day period or per state requirement. Review of the vital sign records for Res #71 showed their weight on: - 05/02/25 - 126.1 pounds, - 05/14/25 - 114.2 pounds, and - 05/27/25 - 109.4 pounds. A care plan intervention, implemented on 05/05/25, read in part. Monitor vital sign and weight as ordered, notify physician if there is a significant weight change. A Dietitian's Recommendations for Primary Care Provider form, dated 05/30/25, showed Res #71's weight had decreased from 126.1 pounds on 05/02/25 to 109.4 pounds in one month. The form also recommended 60 milliliters of TwoCal HN (a liquid nutritional…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive care plan intervention regarding smoking safety assessments for 1 (#25) of 18 sampled residents reviewed for care plans. The DON stated there were 74 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A facility policy titled Smoking Policy, undated, read in part, The nursing staff will conduct an assessment upon admission to establish guidelines for each resident who wished to smoke. The policy further read in part, Assessments will continue to be completed upon admission, quarterly and change in condition. A facility policy titled Care Plans - Comprehensive, dated 2010, read in part, Care plan interventions are designed after careful consideration of the relationship between the resident's problem areas and their causes. When possible, interventions address the underlying source(s) of the problem area(s), rather than addressing only symptoms or triggers. It is recognized that care planning individual symptoms or Care Area Triggers in isolation may have little, if any, benefit for the resident. A care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident that smoked cigarettes was assessed for the ability to safely smoke for 1 (#25) of 4 sampled residents reviewed for accidents. The DON stated 15 residents at the facility smoked tobacco products. Findings: A facility policy titled, Smoking Policy, undated, read in part, The nursing staff will conduct an assessment upon admission to establish guidelines for each resident who wished to smoke. Any restrictions will be noted in the resident's record. The policy also read in part, Assessment will continue to be completed upon admission, quarterly, and change of condition, A care plan problem, dated 12/27/24, showed Res #25 was a smoker and at risk for injury. A correlated care plan intervention, dated 12/27/24, showed the nursing department was to conduct smoking assessments on Res #25. An annual MDS assessment for Res #25, dated 05/12/25, showed in section C, the resident had a BIMS score of 3 which indicated Res #25's cognition was severely impaired. On 06/10/25 at 1:01 p.m., LPN #1 was asked about Res #25's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to report an allegation of physical abuse to local law enforcement for 1 (#80) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for abuse. The assistant administrator reported the census in the facility was 74. Findings: A facility policy titled Abuse - Reportable Events, dated 08/19, read in part, All alleged allegations of abuse will be reported to the appropriate state agency and to all other agencies as required by regulation. The policy further read in part, Local law enforcement will be notified of any reportable crime against a resident. An admission assessment, dated 05/11/24, showed Res #80 had a BIMS score (a test of cognitive function) of 15, which is indicative of intact cognition. An incident report form, dated 05/17/24, showed Res #80 reported an allegation of physical abuse to facility staff. The report also showed the physician, the resident's legal representative and adult protective services were notified. The report did not show local law enforcement had been notified. On 06/11/25 at 2:49 p.m., the DON stated they could not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-01-11 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure sufficient staff to provide supervision for one (#35) of 17 sampled residents reviewed for sufficient staffing. The administrator identified 67 residents resided in the facility and 23 resident were dependent on staff for assistance with activities of daily living. Findings: Resident #35 had diagnoses which included pain, dysphagia following cerebral infarction, and need for assistance with personal care. A Physician Order, dated 11/21/23, documented Resident #35 was to have nectar thick liquids. An admission assessment, dated 11/24/23, documented Resident #35 had no cognitive impairment, needed substantial assistance with toileting, showers, dressing, and personal hygiene, and had upper and lower extremity impairment. A Timecard Editor, dated 12/30/23, documented three staff clocked in on 10 p.m.-6 a.m. shift. A Timecard Editor, dated 01/05/24, documented three staff clocked in on 10 p.m.-6 a.m. shift. A Timecard Editor, dated 01/06/23, documented four staff clocked in on 10 p.m. -6 a.m. shift. On 01/10/24 at 2:37…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-11 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — pattern
  Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure RN coverage for eight consecutive hours per day. The administrator identified 67 residents resided in the facility. On 01/09/24 at 2:56 pm., RN coverage time sheets were reviewed with the Adm. Asst. from 10/01/23 through 10/31/23. There was no RN coverage for eight consecutive hours per day for the following dates: 10/03/23, 10/04/23, 10/05/23, 10/07/23, and 10/09/23 through 10/14/23. The Administrator acknowledged there was no RN coverage. A staff schedule, dated 12/25/23 through 01/13/24 did not have a Registered Nurse scheduled on 01/07/24. On 01/09/24 at 3:22 p.m., the Adm. Asst. was shown the staff schedule dated 12/25/23 through 01/13/23 and asked if there had been registered nurse coverage on 01/07/24. They reviewed the the payroll time on the computer and stated no RN had clocked in on that date. No further information was provided.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-01-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure: a. staff did not carry two resident's medications (#126 and #59) to administer at the same time, b. staff counted controlled medications every shift per policy, and c. controlled medications had accurate narcotic count sheets for two (#70 and #46) of four sampled residents reviewed for medications. The administrator identified 67 residents resided in the facility. The DON identified 35 residents received narcotics. Findings: An undated Narcotic Count policy, read in parts .To complete a physical inventory of narcotics at change of each shift by two licensed nurses to identify discrepancies and need for reconciliation and accountability .To assure controlled drugs are handled, stored .properly .To assure proper record keeping for controlled drugs .Narcotic records are reconciled by a physical count of the remaining narcotics supply at the change of each shift by the oncoming and outgoing licensed nurse .If the count is not accurate, the nurse going off duty is to remain on duty until the count is…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-01-11 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
  Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure snacks were offered to one [#8] of three sampled residents reviewed for snacks. The administrator identified 67 residents resided in the facility. Findings: The Snacks (Between Meal and Bedtime) policy, revised October 2010, read in part, .The person performing this procedure should record the following information in the resident's medical record: 1. The date and time the snack was served. 2. The name and title of the individual(s) who served the snack. 3. The amount of the snack eaten by the resident(i.e., 50%, 75%, etc.). 4. If and how the resident participated in the procedure or any changes in the resident's ability to participate in the procedure. 5. Any special special request(s) made by the resident concerning his or her eating time or food likes and dislikes. 6. Any difficulty the resident had in feeding himself of herself, chewing or swallowing. 7. If the resident refused the snack, the reason(s) why and the intervention taken. 8. The signature and title of the person recording the data. On 1/10/24 at 1:27…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to BGM ESTATE — 15 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 32 rows in the source record cover these 24 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $480K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OK