First Shamrock Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 55 beds and averages 37.7 residents a day — about 69% occupied, or roughly 17 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.26 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.14 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.02 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.24 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.27 on weekdays — 1% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.09 to 0.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 70% is well above the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

34 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2026-05-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident with exit seeking behaviors had care plan interventions to address and prevent elopement for 1 (#19) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for accidents. Resident #19 eloped through a facility window. The administrator identified 16 residents at risk for elopement. On 04/28/26, an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to exist related to the facility's failure to ensure a resident with exit seeking behaviors had care plan interventions to address and prevent elopement resulting in Resident #19 eloping.On 04/28/26 at 6:43 p.m., the Oklahoma State Department of Health was notified and verified the existence of an IJ situation.On 04/28/26 at 6:53 p.m., the administrator was notified of the IJ situation and the IJ template was provided.On 04/29/26 at 3:02 p.m., an acceptable plan of removal was approved by the Oklahoma State Department of Health. The plan of removal, read in part, Elopement policy and procedures reviewed and revised - signature 4.30.2026 at 12 PMResident #19 care plan was reviewed and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-05-06 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from physical abuse for 1 (#19) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for abuse. Resident #19 was physically abused by another resident. A review of an undated facility video monitoring showed Resident #20 attempted to grab a TV remote from the table where Resident #19 was. Resident #19 grabbed the remote and held onto it. Resident #20 continued attempts to take the remote from Resident #19 standing over them. Resident #19 asked Resident #20 several times not to touch it and to get away from them. Resident #19 was cussing at Resident #20 as they persisted at their approached. Resident #19 asked Resident #20 if they wanted their (curse word withheld) beat and stood up from their sitting position. Resident #20 responded, Yes, whip my [curse word withheld]. Resident #20 swung and hit Resident #19 on their face. CNA #4 stated from the dining area Hey stop it, both of you stop. CNA #4 was walking into the common area from the dining area with a cart. Resident #19 told Resident #20 to get away…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · J2026-05-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to:a. provide adequate supervision and a secure environment to prevent elopement for a resident with known exit seeking behaviors for 1 (#19). Resident #19 eloped through a facility window, andb. implement fall interventions for 1 (#3) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for accidents. An admission assessment for Resident #19, dated 07/28/25, showed the resident wandered and their cognition was severely impaired.A wandering and elopement risk assessment for Resident #19, dated 07/28/25, had four areas marked, Yes. The assessment read in part, the resident is at risk if the answer to any question #3-#7 is yes. The areas marked yes on the assessment were placement in the facility, history of wandering, confusion and disorientation, and dementia. A wandering and elopement risk assessment for Resident #19, dated 01/29/26, had two areas marked, Yes. The assessment read in part, the resident is at risk if the answer to any question #3-#7 is yes. he…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-05-06 · tag F0574 — widespread
  The resident has the right to receive notices in a format and a language he or she understands.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure contact information for filing a complaint with the State Agency was available to the residents.The facility manager identified 37 residents resided in the facility. Findings:On 04/28/26 at 10:12 a.m., both resident halls, both nurses' stations, and the main living area were observed. There was no information regarding filing a complaint with the State agency.On 04/28/26 at 10:03 a.m., a confidential interview was held with the resident council group. The resident council group was asked if they had been informed of their rights and given information on how to formally complain to the State about the care they were receiving. They stated, No.On 04/28/26 at 10:20 a.m., the administrator stated the information on how to formally file a complaint with the State Agency was not posted at this moment.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-05-06 · tag F0577 — widespread
  Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based observation and interview, the facility failed to post notice of the availability of past State survey results in areas of the facility that were prominent and accessible to the public.The facility manager identified 37 residents resided in the facility. Findings: On 04/28/26 at 10:12 a.m., both resident halls, both nurses' stations, and the main living area were observed. There was no posted information on where the past State survey results were located. On 04/28/26 at 10:15 a.m., the administrator showed the location of the past State survey results. The binder was to the right of the facility entrance door.On 04/28/26 at 10:03 a.m., a confidential interview was held with the resident council group. The resident council group stated they did not know where to locate past State survey results.On 04/28/26 at 10:16 a.m., the administrator stated a sign was posted to show location of past State survey results, but it was taken down by a resident. They stated they were not sure when it was removed by the resident.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-05-06 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — widespread
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents had access to the grievance procedure.The facility manager identified 37 residents resided in the facility. Findings:On 04/28/26 at 10:12 a.m., both resident halls, both nurses' stations, and the main living area were observed. There was no information regarding the facility's grievance procedure or location of grievance forms. The grievance personnel information was posted.On 05/06/26 at 1:37 p.m., the facility grievance binder was reviewed. There were no grievances.A Grievance Policy, dated 11/28/16, read in part, The facility will provide a mechanism for filing a grievance/complaint without fear of retaliation and/or barriers of service; will provide residents, resident representatives and others information about the mechanisms and procedure to file a grievance.On 04/28/26 at 10:03 a.m., a confidential interview was held with the resident council group. The resident council group stated they did not know how to file a grievance.On 04/28/26 at 10:20 a.m., the administrator stated the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-05-06 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
  Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure RN coverage for 8 consecutive hours seven days a week.The facility manager identified 37 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An RN coverage policy, reviewed 01/01/26, read in part, Nurse staffing in nursing homes has a substantial impact on the quality of care and outcomes that residents experience.Facilities are responsible for ensuring they have an RN providing services at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week.The facility must designate a registered nurse (RN) to serve as the DON on a full-time basis. A Punch Audit Report, dated 11/01/25 through 04/26/26, showed no RN hours for 10/01/25 through 10/03/25 10/06/25 through 10/15/25, 10/18/25 through 10/19/25, 10/21/25, 10/25/25 through 10/26/25, 10/28/25, 11/01/25 through 11/02/25, 11/06/25 through 11/09/25, 11/13/25, 11/27/25, 12/04/25, 12/08/25, 12/11/25, 12/22/25, 12/25/25, and 12/31/25. On 04/29/26 at 10:08 a.m., the business office manager stated between October 1st and October 14th, the facility had no RN coverage. They stated there was no RN…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-05-06 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure an extended menu with portion sizes was available for use during one of one meal service observed.The facility manager identified 37 residents who received meal services from the kitchen. Findings:On 04/27/26 at 7:50 a.m., a facility extended menu was requested during entrance conference.On 05/05/26 at 8:23 a.m., [NAME] #1 was observed to put a 5-ounce scoop of scrambled eggs on two plates.On 05/05/26 at 8:27 a.m., [NAME] #1 was observed to put 4-ounce spoon of scrambled eggs on three plates.On 05/05/26 at 9:02 a.m., the administrator brought a box to the surveyors and was observed to shift through the paper items. There was no extended menu in the box.On 05/05/26 at 6:56 a.m., [NAME] #1 stated the breakfast menu was biscuit and gravy, hash brown, scrambled eggs, and cold cereal.On 05/05/26 at 8:28 a.m., [NAME] #1 stated the proper portion size should be 4-ounces of scrambled eggs.On 05/05/26 at 9:06 a.m., the administrator stated the facility did not have an extended menu at this time.On 05/05/26 at 10:07 a.m.,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-05-06 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — pattern
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was not administered a psychotropic medication without adequate indications for its use and received gradual dose reductions for 1 (#4) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications.The RNC identified 28 residents were prescribed psychotropic medications. Findings: An undated EHR facesheet for Resident #4 showed the resident had diagnoses which included vascular dementia (severe) with psychotropic disturbances, depression, and an anxiety disorder due to known physiological condition. A facility policy titled Policy on Unnecessary Drugs, dated 01/01/99, read in part, All medications prescribed to residents must be based on an individual assessment of each resident's clinical condition, needs, and goals of care. Medications must be regularly reviewed to determine their continued necessity and appropriateness.A discontinued medication order, dated 02/17/25, showed Resident #4 had received an order for Invega Sustenna (an antipsychotic) 78 mg once a month for the first time for the diagnosis of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-06 · tag F0552 — isolated
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to inform a resident or their representative of the risk, benefits, and alternative treatment options prior to giving psychotropic medications for 1 (#4) of 5 sampled residents whose clinical records were reviewed for unnecessary medications.The RNC identified 28 residents were prescribed psychotropic medications. Findings:The undated clinical record facesheet showed Resident #4 had diagnoses which included vascular dementia (severe) with psychotic disturbance, depression, and an anxiety disorder due to known physiological condition (history of).The facility's medication consent form binder from 2025 was reviewed. A consent form dated 05/05/25 for clozapine 75 mg four times a day for Resident #4 was found. There was no other documentation the resident or the resident's representative had been informed of the risks and benefits of the use of other psychotropic medications, treatment alternatives/options, and the choice of treatment the resident preferred before receiving the psychotropic medications. A physician's order for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-06 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was developed within 48 hours of admission for 1 (#4) of 12 sampled residents whose care plans were reviewed.The facility manager identified 37 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An undated policy titled Care Plans - Baseline, read in part, To assure that the resident's immediate care needs are met and maintained, a baseline care plan will be developed within forty-eight (48) hours of the resident's admission.A significant change assessment, dated 06/17/25, showed Resident #4 had diagnoses which included anxiety, vascular dementia (severe) with psychotropic disturbance, depression, acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, and an original admission date of 12/03/24, and a reentry date of 05/30/25.Review of the electronic health record did not show a baseline care plan was developed for Resident #4.On 05/05/26 at 1:24 p.m., the facility manager stated they could not find the baseline care plan for Resident #4, which meant there was not one for them.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-06 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a clinical rationale from the physician was provided on a gradual dose reduction request for a antidepressant and an antipsychotic for 1 (#37) of 5 sampled residents who were reviewed for unnecessary medications.The facility manager identified 37 residents resided in the facility. Findings:A Policy on Unnecessary Drugs, dated 01/01/1999, read in part, To ensure that residents in the long-term care facility are prescribed medications based on their clinical needs, avoiding unnecessary drugs that could lead to adverse effects, interactions, or diminished quality of life.Criteria for Identifying Unnecessary Drugs: Lack of a documented clinical indication for the medication.Documentation will include the rationale for continuing, discontinuing, or adjusting any medication, as well as discussions with the resident or their representative.A significant change assessment, dated 11/06/25, showed Resident #37 was severely impaired in cognition for decision making, had diagnoses of dementia and psychotic disorder, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-06 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure water was not utilized to puree foods for 1 of 1 breakfast meal observed.Cook #1 identified one resident on a pureed diet resided in the facility. Findings:On 05/05/26 at 7:54 a.m., [NAME] #1 was observed to place two hash brown patties in a blender. [NAME] #1 was observed to add an unmeasured amount of hot water to the blender and puree the hash browns.On 05/05/26 at 8:06 a.m., [NAME] #1 was observed to add a 5-ounce scoop of scrambled eggs to the blender. [NAME] #1 was observed to add an unmeasured amount of hot water to the blender and puree the scrambled eggs.On 05/05/26 at 8:12 a.m., [NAME] #1 was observed to place one and a half biscuit in a blender. [NAME] #1 was observed to add an unmeasured amount of hot water to the blender and puree the biscuits.On 05/05/26 at 7:56 a.m., [NAME] #1 stated they did not know how much water they added to the hash browns. They stated they just added water to food items until it was pureed.On 05/05/26 at 10:07 a.m., [NAME] #2 stated they used a half cup of hot water to puree food…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$29,726 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $29,726 — penalty dated 2026-05-06

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to BGM ESTATE — 15 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 38 rows in the source record cover these 27 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

11 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 95% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $272K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OK