Antlers Manor

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 1.40 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 99% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 133 beds and averages 35.6 residents a day — about 27% occupied, or roughly 97 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.87 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.47 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.86 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.79 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.89 on weekdays — 4% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.50 to 0.42 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2026-05-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure elopement prevention interventions were implemented on the care plan for 1 (#1) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for elopement.A wandering and elopement risk assessment for Resident #1, dated 05/28/25, showed the resident was at risk for wandering and elopement.An incident report form, dated 11/06/25, showed Resident #1's family member informed the facility the resident had walked to their home. The report showed the resident had a small abrasion to their forehead.Resident #1's care plan did not show wandering and elopement incidents/interventions prior to 11/06/25.The administrator identified 21 residents in the facility at risk for elopement.On 05/13/26, an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to exist related to the facility's failure to ensure a resident at risk for wandering and elopement had care plan interventions to address and prevent elopement. This resulted in the elopement of Resident #1 from the facility.On 05/13/26 at 5:11 p.m., the Oklahoma State Department of Health was notified and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-05-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and maintain a secure environment to prevent elopement of a resident with a known history of wandering and elopement risk for 1 (#1) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for elopement.A wandering and elopement risk assessment for Resident #1, dated 05/28/25, showed the resident was at risk for wandering and elopement. A quarterly assessment for Resident #1, dated 09/01/25, showed the resident had a diagnosis of dementia and their cognition was severely impaired with a BIMS of 5.An incident report form, dated 11/06/25, showed Resident #1's family member informed the facility the resident showed up at their home. The report showed the resident had a small abrasion to their forehead.On 05/12/26 at 2:27 p.m., Resident #1's family member stated the resident showed up at their home in the middle of the night. They stated the resident was wearing dark clothes and had to cross the main road to get to the house. Resident #1's family member stated they were grateful it was in the middle of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure a resident was assessed related to smoking and accident hazards for 1 (#22) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for smoking. The administrator identified three residents were smokers. Findings: A policy titled SMOKING SAFETY, dated 08/03/15, read in part Initiate and complete the Smoking Safety evaluation if the resident requests smoking privileges as follows: 1. On admission 2. Quarterly .Staff will monitor distribution of smoking material during smoking sessions .Document interventions on the resident's care plan. Resident #22 had diagnoses which included acute upper respiratory infection, chronic atrial fibrillation, shortness of breath, congestive heart failure, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. An annual minimum data set assessment, dated 12/21/24, documented the resident was cognitively intact and currently used tobacco. The resident's plan of care, revised 12/23/24, did not document the resident's use of tobacco. The facility could not provide documentation regarding smoking safety assessments completed on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-06 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure: a. a PRN psychotropic medication had a 14 day stop date for 1 (#11], and b. an antipsychotic medication had an appropriate diagnosis for 1 (#5) of 5 residents sampled for unnecessary medications. The administrator reported 32 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Res #5 admitted to the facility with diagnoses of other Alzheimer's disorder, other depressive episodes, and bipolar disorder. A physician order, dated 02/19/24, showed risperidone (antipsychotic medication) tablet 0.5 mg, one tablet by mouth twice a day for a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. On 03/06/25 at 8:39 a.m., the DON stated Alzheimer's was not an appropriate diagnosis for an antipsychotic medication. 2. Res #11 admitted to the facility with diagnoses of Alzheimer's and anxiety disorder. A physician order, dated 11/22/24, showed Ativan (benzodiazepine) 0.5 mg by mouth every 12 hours PRN. There order did not contain a 14 day stop date. On 03/06/25 at 8:35 a.m., the DON reported the Ativan should have had a 14 day stop date.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the low temperature dish machine had the appropriate amount of chemical to sanitize dishes for the facility. The administrator identified 32 residents who ate meals prepared by the kitchen. Findings: On [DATE] at 11:38 a.m., the DM obtained a bottle of test strips for testing the sanitizer level for the dish machine. The test strip did not register a result. The container of tests strips documented the strips had expired on 04/2024. On [DATE] at 1:25 p.m., the DM used new test strips obtained by the facility to check the sanitizer level. The test strip showed 10 parts per million. A undated manufacturers operations guide for the dish machine, read in part, Verify Sanitizer levels regularly. Use test strip to ensure sanitizer level is at least 50 ppm and no more than 200 ppm. A dish machine temperature log for [DATE] did not document the sanitizer level results for the dish machine. On [DATE] at 12:24 p.m., the DM stated they had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-11-14 · tag F0636 — pattern
  Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an admission MDS resident assessment was completed within 14 days from admission for three (#31, 38 and #39) of 12 residents whose assessments were reviewed. The Long-Term Care Application for Medicare and Medicaid form documented 34 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A facility policy titled, Resident Assessment Instrument, revised October 2010, read in part, The Assessment Coordinator is responsible for ensuring .timely resident assessments .in accordance with the following schedule: a. Within fourteen (14) days of the resident's admission to the facility . 1. Res #31 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included intellectual disability, seizures, cellulitis, anxiety and depression. A review of Res #31's assessments showed the admission assessment, dated 09/18/23, was still in progress and not completed. 2. Res #38 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included cerebral infarction, dysphagia, hypertension, diabetes and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was developed for three (#7, 31 and #38) of three sampled residents whose care plans were reviewed. The Long-Term Care Application for Medicare and Medicaid form documented 34 residents resided in the facility. Findings: The Care Planning - Interdisciplinary Team policy, revised December 2008, read in part, .A comprehensive care plan for each resident is developed within seven (7) days of completion of the resident assessment . 1. Res #7 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included diabetes, hypertension, Alzheimer's, aphasia and depression. There was no comprehensive care plan for Res #7 in their clinical record. 2. Res #31 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included intellectual disability, seizures, cellulitis, anxiety and depression. There was no comprehensive care plan for Res #31 in their clinical record. 3. Res #38 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included cerebral infarction,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-11-14 · tag F0700 — pattern
  Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to attempt to use alternatives, assess for risks, obtain informed consent, prior to installing side rails on resident beds for four (#2, 12, 19, and #27) of five residents reviewed for accident hazards related to side rails. The facility administrator identified 10 resident who had side rails installed on their beds. Findings: 1. Res #2 had diagnoses which included dementia, schizophrenia, psychotic disorder and seizures. A physician order, dated 09/14/14, documented the resident had quarter side rails to enhance independent bed mobility. A side rail consent form, dated 04/23/18, did not document what interventions the facility attempted prior to installing side rails, or how the facility was going to mitigate the risk from the use of side rails specific to the resident. A side rail assessment, dated 05/30/18, was provided for review by the facility. The assessment did not document all the required components. No other assessments were provided by the facility. A quarterly MDS assessment, dated 09/28/23,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to prepare pureed food in a sanitary manner. DA #1 identified four residents who received a pureed diet. Findings: A facility policy, titled Preventing Foodborne Illness - Employee Hygiene and Sanitary Practices, revised December 2008, read in part, .4. Employees must wash their hands .g. During food preparation, as often as necessary to remove soil and contamination and to prevent cross contamination when changing tasks .10. Gloves are considered single-use items and must be discarded after completing the task for which they are used. The use of disposable gloves does not substitute for proper handwashing . On 11/13/23 at 10:45 a.m., DA #1 was observed to wash their hands, put on disposable gloves, and take chili and corn chips from the steam table to the blender bowl. DA #1 was observed to leave the blender bowl to get American cheese slices out of the refrigerator. With their same gloved hands, DA #1 was observed to touch the refrigerator and the cheese slice package and return to the blender bowl. Without removing their…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-11-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner which promoted their quality of life by standing above the residents while assisting them to eat for two (#2 and #27) of two residents sampled for dignity. The facility administrator documented 11 residents required assistance with eating. Findings: 1. Res #2 had diagnoses which included dementia, schizophrenia, seizures, and malnutrition. A care plan, dated 11/13/18, documented the staff were to maintain adequate nutrition for the resident by adhering to the diet and feeding him. On 11/08/23 at 12:37 p.m., the resident was observed being fed by an unidentified staff member who was standing at the residents bedside. 2. Res #27 was admitted with diagnoses which included generalized anxiety disorder, chronic pain syndrome, and anemia. A quarterly assessment, dated 10/12/23, documented the resident was dependent with eating. On 11/08/23 at 12:03 p.m., an unidentified staff member was observed standing at the resident's bedside…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-14 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure MDS assessments accurately reflected the residents' status for three (#1, 19, and 32) of 12 residents whose assessments were reviewed. The facility failed to accurately assess for: a. gradual dose reductions for Res #1. b. oral health and condition of teeth for Res #19. c. antiplatelet medications for Res # 32. The Long-Term Care Facility Application for Medicare and Medicaid form documented 34 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Res #1 had diagnoses which included intellectual disability, Alzheimer's disease, epilepsy, and personality and behavioral disorder. A consultant pharmacist review, dated 03/16/23, documented a request for reduction of Rexulti from 0.5 mg to .25 mg at bedtime. A physician response, dated 04/18/23, documented they disagreed with the request documenting the nursing staff stated the resident was still yelling out and a reduction was appropriate at that time. A physician order, dated 04/26/23, documented the facility was to administer Rexulti (an antipsychotic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-11-14 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was developed for two (#7 and #38) of 12 residents whose care plans were reviewed. The Long-Term Care Application for Medicare and Medicaid form documented 34 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A facility policy titled, Care Plans - Preliminary, revised August 2006, read in part, .To assure that the resident's immediate care needs are met and maintained, a preliminary care plan will be developed within twenty-four (24) hours of the resident's admission. 1. Res #7 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included diabetes, hypertension, Alzheimer's, aphasia and depression. A baseline care plan for Res #7 was not documented in their clinical record. 2. Res #38 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included cerebral infarction, dysphagia, hypertension, diabetes and anxiety. A baseline care plan for Res #7 was not documented in their clinical record. On 11/14/23 at 1:05 p.m. the DON reported a baseline care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$13,070 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $13,070 — penalty dated 2026-05-18

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to BGM ESTATE — 15 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 35 rows in the source record cover these 26 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

11 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 79% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $322K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 10% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OK