No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Meadowbrook Nursing Center

113 East Jones, Chouteau, OK 74337 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 65 certified beds · (918) 476-8918 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Jul 20231 immediate-jeopardy citation$21,645 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jul 2023
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (34) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $21,645 in federal fines (most recent 2026-03-17)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
105 S Chouteau Ave · (918) 476-6038 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
214 N Chouteau Ave · (918) 476-6455 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
500 N Chouteau Ave · (918) 476-6700 · Call to confirm hours
Park
69 W Harrison Ave · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
310 W Cowley St · (918) 476-5645

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased3.6%13.6%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.5%3.3%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%1.9%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%2.8%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%3.4%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.9%4.7%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened13.1%13.7%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication8.4%25.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.2%94.6%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.0%4.7%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control4.6%17.1%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table0.0%17.5%17.1%check this — see note marked star below the table
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.8%1.4%better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.16U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.07hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.16 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 14% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFsnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.34
RN hours/ resident / day
0.90
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.02
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.26
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.37
RN hoursweekends
48.4%
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 65 beds and averages 30.6 residents a day — about 47% occupied, or roughly 34 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.26 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.34 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.02 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.13 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.31 on weekdays — 5% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.33 to 0.37 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

19
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-17)
1
at the previous standard inspection (2024-08-07)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

34 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-03-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    On 03/11/26, an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to exist related to the facility's failure to provide supervision to prevent accident hazards related to smoking. On 03/02/26, Resident #26 was smoking in their room while wearing oxygen. The oxygen combusted which caused a facial burn, singed beard, and mustache hair. On 03/11/26 at 2:56 p.m., the Oklahoma State Department of Health verified the existence of an IJ situation. On 03/11/26 at 3:05 p.m., the administrator was notified of the IJ situation. An IJ template was provided to the administrator. On 03/12/26 at 10:47 a.m., an acceptable POR (plan of removal) was received. The POR read in part, Plan of Removal for lJ Amended 3/12/2026 at 0950 [9:50 a.m.]1. Notify MedicaI Director2. Notify resident # 26 hospice provider of lJ and coordination of care3. New Smoking Assessment for all smokers4. Review/revise smoking policy with resident and resident council with agreement and approval for revision of checking for any smoking material at the end of each smoke break. Update smoking policy to include observation of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2023-07-31 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents did not experience resident to resident abuse for two (#10 and #16) of two residents sampled for abuse. The facility failed to ensure: a. Res #80 did not assault and injure Res #10 and #16. b. Res #10 was assessed for psychosocial harm and interventions were put in place to mitigate the harm after the assault by Res #80. c. a follow up of Res #16 possible brain bleeding caused by the assault by Res #80 was conducted. d. they instituted new interventions to protect the staff, the resident, or other residents when the facility the facility knew or should have known Res #80 was capable of aggressive behaviors towards others and had continued behaviors. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 28 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A facility policy, titled Abuse - Reportable Events, revised on 01/2018, read in parts, .It is the responsibility of all facility staff to prohibit resident abuse,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision to prevent an elopement for 1 (#1) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for elopement.The administrator identified 28 residents who resided in the facility.Findings:On 04/15/26 at 12:07 p.m., Res #1 was observed in their room sitting on the side of their bed. Res #1 was observed to be clean and dressed appropriately.On 04/16/26 at 10:45 a.m., Res #1 was observed resting in bed with their eyes closed.On 04/16/26 at 2:00 p.m., Res #1 was observed in their room sitting on the side of their bed looking through papers.An undated policy titled Missing Resident, read in part, It is the intent of the facility to be aware of its resident's usual habits and locations as reasonably practicable. This is with the intent of not invading privacy but to identify a possible missing resident.An undated face sheet showed Res #1 admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included congestive heart failure and hypertension.An elopement assessment, dated 02/12/26, showed Res #1 was not at risk for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · F2026-03-17 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure nurse staffing was posted.The administrator identified 34 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: On 03/12/26 at 1:30 p.m., nurse staffing information was not observed posted in the facility. On 03/13/26 at 9:28 a.m., a dry erase board was observed by the nurse's station that contained the date, staff name with titles, census, and how many residents were in the hospital. An undated policy titled, Staffing Requirement Policy, read in part, Daily staffing reports will be posted for residents and visitors to view. On 03/13/26 at 9:28 a.m., LPN #2 stated they posted nurse staffing information on the dry erase board by the nurse's station. On 03/13/26 at 9:41 a.m., the DON stated nurse staffing information was documented on the dry erase board for visitors and residents. They stated they had a book at the nurse's station for daily assignments for the staff but those were not available for visitors and residents. On 03/13/26 at 9:51 a.m., the administrator stated they posted nurse staffing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-03-17 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to have effective administration who utilized its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. The facility administration failed to:a. report allegations of abuse to OSDH,b. investigate allegations of abuse,c. develop/implement comprehensive care plans, d. review and revise care plans, ande. provide supervision to prevent accident hazards related to smoking. The administrator identified 34 residents who resided at the facility.Findings: a. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure allegations of abuse were reported to OSDH for 1 (#4) of 1 sampled residents who were reviewed for abuse. On 03/12/26 at 3:56 p.m., the administrator stated they had not reported the allegations of abuse made by Resident #4 on 02/22/26 or 02/28/26 to OSDH because the abuse had not occurred per a skin assessment and the police officer's investigation. b. Based on record review and interview, the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-03-17 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespread
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain an effective Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement (QAPI), as evidenced by failure to demonstrate systematic identification, reporting, investigation, analysis, and prevention of adverse events and documentation demonstrating the development, implementation, and evaluation of corrective actions or performance improvement activities. The facility had systematic problems with identification of abuse allegations, reporting abuse allegations to OSDH, development of comprehensive care plans/revision of care plans, and adequate supervision to prevent accident hazards related to smoking.The administrator identified 34 residents who resided in the facility.Findings: Please refer to CMS form 2567 with exit date 03/17/26, F609, F610, F656, F657, and F689 for evidence details. A policy titled Quality Assessment and Assurance Program dated 06/27/13, read in part, 4. Each department or services will submit to the Quality Assessment and Assurance Committee a quarterly report of its own monitoring systems.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-17 · tag F0552 — pattern
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents and/or resident representatives had been informed of medication changes for 3 (#4, 15, and #37) of 5 sampled residents who were reviewed for unnecessary medications. LPN #1 identified 34 residents who received medications in the facility.Findings: 1. A policy titled, Notification of Changes Policy, read in part, It is the policy of this facility that changes in a resident's condition or treatment are immediately shared with the resident and/or the resident representative . A physician order, dated 12/17/25, showed Resident #4 was ordered clozapine (an antipsychotic medication) 50mg at bedtime. Nurse progress notes, dated 12/17/25 through 12/22/25, did not show the resident had been made aware of the new medication order or the risks/benefits of the change in their medication treatment regimen. A quarterly assessment, dated 01/16/26, showed Resident #4 had a BIMS score of 15, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision making, received antipsychotic medications, and had a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-17 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide residents assistance to develop an advance directive for 1 (#15) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for advance directives. The administrator identified 34 residents who resided at the facility.Findings: An Advance Directive Policy and Record form, dated 09/21/25, for Resident #15 read in part, Documents were not received, Facility informed of Document. The form showed a POA was in place, with initials from the responsible party for Resident #15. An admission assessment, dated 09/28/25, showed Resident #15 had a BIMS of 15 which indicated they were cognitively intact for daily decision making. The assessment showed diagnoses which included dementia. On 03/13/26 at 3:30 p.m., the DON stated the business office manager typically went through the admission packet with all new admissions. The DON stated the resident was not offered/declined/accepted assistance to formulate an advance directive.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive care plans were completed for 2 (#4 and #20) of 12 sampled residents reviewed for care plans. The administrator identified 34 residents who resided at the facility. Findings: 1. On 03/09/26 at 3:35 p.m., Resident #20 stated they required someone to stay with them when they smoked. They stated they could not push their wheelchair because it was a transport chair. An admission assessment, dated 12/08/25, showed Resident #20 was a smoker. A care plan, dated 12/13/25, saved on 03/11/26 by the surveyor, showed no concern for smoking for Resident #20. A care plan, revised 12/15/25, saved on 03/12/26 by the surveyor, showed a concern for smoking with interventions. A Quarterly Smoking Assessment, dated 03/10/26, showed Resident #20 was safe for smoking with minimal supervision. A Quarterly Smoking Assessment, dated 03/11/26, showed Resident #20 was safe for smoking with minimal supervision. No other smoking assessments were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-17 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure care plans were updated quarterly for 5 (#4, 28, 1, 37, and #26) of 12 sampled residents whose care plans were reviewed.The administrator identified 34 residents who resided at the facility. Findings: 1.A Care Planning-Interdisciplinary Team policy, revised 09/2013, read in part, Assessments of residents are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the residents and the residents' conditions change.The interdisciplinary team must review and update the care plan: a. when there has been a significant change in the resident's condition; b. when the desired outcome is not met; c. when the resident has been readmitted to the facility from a hospital stay; and d. at least quarterly, in conjunction with the required quarterly MDS assessment. A care plan for Resident #4 showed it was last reviewed/revised on 01/31/25. A quarterly assessment, dated 01/16/26, showed Resident #4 had a BIMS score of 15, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision making, and had diagnoses which included…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-17 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff competencies were completed for 4 (CNA#2, 3, 4, and CNA #5) of 4 employee files reviewed who were hired in the past 4 months.The administrator identified 11 CNAs who were hired in the past 4 months.Findings:An undated policy titled New Hire Process, read in part, All other functions turned over to the DON or other department head for scheduling and training .Employees are subject to TB test, employee physical, competencies, and three [3] days of training on the floor at the DON's discretion and schedule.The employee file for CNA #3 showed they were hired on 11/22/25. The employee file did not show a staff competency had been completed.The employee file for CNA #4 showed they were hired on 01/28/26. The employee file did not show a staff competency had been completed.The employee file for CNA #5 showed they were hired on 01/08/26. The employee file did not show a staff competency had been completed.The employee file for CNA #2 showed they were hired on 02/05/26. The employee file did not show a staff competency…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-17 · tag F0730 — pattern
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure performance reviews were completed every 12 months for 1 (CMA #1) of 1 employee file reviewed who had been employed by the facility for 12 months or more.The administrator identified 34 residents who resided in the facility.Findings: On 03/11/26 at 9:41 a.m., CMA #1 was observed to administer Resident #1 zinc 50mg by mouth. A physician order, dated 03/03/26, showed an order for Resident #1 for zinc 30mg every day. The employee file for CMA #1 showed they were hired on 11/19/24. The employee file did not show a performance review had been completed since they were hired. On 03/13/26 at 9:39 a.m., the DON stated they did not have a system in place to ensure CNA/CMAs had performance reviews completed at least every 12 months. The DON confirmed they could not locate documentation to show CMA #1 had a performance review since being hired.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 22 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to:a. ensure medications were secured for 1 (nurse treatment cart) of 3 medication/treatment carts observed for secured medications;b. ensure medications were dated when opened and not expired for 1 (nurse treatment cart) of 3 medication/treatment carts observed for medication storage; andc. ensure discontinued narcotics were stored in a separately locked, permanently affixed compartment for 1 (DON medication/treatment cart) of 3 medication/treatment carts observed for medication storage.RN #1 identified three medication/treatment carts in the facility and one medication/treatment cart for discontinued narcotic storage.Findings:1.On 03/09/26 at 11:16 a.m., the nurse treatment cart was observed to be unlocked and unattended by the nurse's station. On 03/09/26 at 11:18 a.m., RN #1 was observed to lock the nurse treatment cart.On 03/13/26 at 1:13 p.m., the nurse treatment cart was observed to be unlocked and unattended at the nurse's station. On 03/13/26 at 1:16 p.m., the administrator was observed to walk by the nurse treatment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure eggs, served over easy, were pasteurized for 1 (breakfast meal) of 2 meals observed and failed to ensure left over foods were labeled and dated in the refrigerator for 1 of 1 refrigerators in the kitchen. The dietary manager identified 8 residents who ate eggs over easy and 34 residents who ate food from the kitchen. Findings: On 03/09/26 at 11:29 a.m., the cold storage refrigerator was observed to have sliced cheese in an unlabeled open zip close bag that was dated 02/26/26. An undated, unlabeled clear plastic container with a lid was observed in the refrigerator. The container was observed to have an unknown liquid. Two flats of unpasteurized eggs were observed in the refrigerator. No other eggs were observed. On 03/10/26 at 8:26 a.m., three residents in the dining room were observed to eat eggs over easy. No policy for storage of food or the use of pasteurized/unpasteurized eggs was provided by the end of the survey. On 03/09/26 at 11:30 a.m., the DM stated the cheese should have been zipped closed. They stated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-17 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure allegations of abuse were reported to OSDH for 1 (#4) of 1 sampled residents who were reviewed for abuse.The administrator identified 34 residents who resided at the facility. Findings:The undated policy titled Abuse Prohibition Procedure, read in part, PURPOSE: To assure that any or all suspected abuse is reported, investigated and that the residents of this facility are kept in a safe environment at all times .If any person(s) see or suspects abuse to a resident or group of residents or Finds any unexplained injury this should be reported immediately to the charge nurse, DON, or Administrator.The Administrator or designees will immediately initiate an investigation And notify the OSDH.A quarterly assessment, dated 01/16/26, showed Resident #4 had a BIMS score of 15, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision making, and had a diagnosis of schizophrenia. A progress note, dated 02/22/26 at 11:42 p.m., read in part, Resident telling other residents during smoke break today that [they had]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-17 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure allegations of abuse were investigated for 1 (#4) of 1 sampled residents who were reviewed for abuse.The administrator identified 34 residents who resided in the facility.Findings:An untitled and undated policy, read in part, Purpose: To assure that any or all suspected abuse is reported, investigated and that the residents of this facility are kept in a safe environment at all times.The Administrator or designees will immediately initiate an investigation and notify the OSDH.A quarterly assessment, dated 01/16/26, showed Resident #4 had a BIMS score of 15, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision making, and had a diagnosis of schizophrenia. A progress note, dated 02/22/26 at 11:42 p.m., read in part, Resident telling other residents during smoke break today that [they had] been getting beaten and has bruises on [their] arms and back. The progress note was signed by LPN #3.A progress note, dated 02/28/26 at 4:56 p.m., read in part, Resident called 911 from resident phone in living…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-17 · tag F0627 — isolated
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the clinical record contained documentation for a discharge for 1 (#36) of 1 sampled residents who were reviewed for discharge.Regional nurse #2 identified 13 residents who had discharged from the facility in the past 3 months. Findings: A discharge return-not anticipated assessment, dated 12/29/25, showed Resident #36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and discharged from the facility to home on [DATE]. Review of the clinical record, dated 12/23/25 through 12/29/25, did not show the reason for the discharge, the status of the resident upon discharge, a physician order for discharge, or what resources were required/provided upon discharge. On 03/16/26 at 9:37 a.m., LPN #2 stated Resident #36 had returned to their apartment upon discharge from the facility with hospice services and left with medication and personal belongings. On 03/16/26 at 9:39 a.m., the DON stated the physician had provided an order that Resident #36 could be discharged…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-17 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a discharge summary was completed and the State Ombudsman office was notified of discharge for 1 (#36) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for discharge.Regional nurse #2 identified 13 residents who had been discharged in the past 3 months. Findings: A discharge return-not anticipated assessment, dated 12/29/25, showed Resident #36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged from the facility to home on [DATE]. Review of the clinical record, dated 12/23/25 through 12/29/25, did not show a discharge summary had been completed or the State Ombudsman office had been notified of the discharge for Resident #36. On 03/16/26 at 9:37 a.m., LPN #2 stated Resident #36 had returned to their apartment upon discharge from the facility with hospice services and left with medication and personal belongings. On 03/16/26 at 9:39 a.m., the DON stated discharge summaries were completed by the MDS coordinator and placed in the clinical record under the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-17 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure pre and post dialysis assessments were completed for 1 (#10) of 1 sampled residents who were reviewed for dialysis.Regional nurse #2 identified two residents who received dialysis at the facility.Findings: An admission assessment, dated 12/15/25, showed Resident #10 had a BIMS score of 11, which indicated the resident was moderately impaired in cognition for daily decision making, and received dialysis. A physician order, dated 02/20/26, showed Resident #10 received dialysis weekly on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. A care plan, dated 03/05/26, showed Resident #10 had a diagnosis of end stage renal disease and received dialysis. Dialysis Communication forms and progress notes, dated 03/02/26 through 03/13/26, did not show nurses had conducted a pre or post dialysis assessment on 03/02/26 or 03/09/26. On 03/13/26 at 4:32 p.m., LPN #2 stated pre and post dialysis assessments were documented on Dialysis Communication forms or in the progress notes. On 03/16/26 at 1:17 p.m., the DON stated they could not locate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-17 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure assessments were conducted for bedrails for 1 (#1) of 1 sampled residents who were reviewed for bedrails.CNA #1 identified six residents who had bedrails.Findings: On 03/10/26 at 8:44 a.m., Resident #1 was observed in bed. An enabler style bedrail was observed on the right side of the bed, in the up position. A physician order, dated 12/22/25, showed Resident #10 may use an enabler style bedrail to assist with positioning. A care plan, revised 12/27/25, read in part, 12/22/2025-Transfer bar evaluation with demonstration completed for safety of repositioning while in bed and transferring in and out of bed safely. Review of the observation section and the progress notes, dated 12/25/25 through 03/13/26, did not show the resident had been assessed for safety with the use of the bedrail. On 03/10/26 at 8:44 a.m., Resident #1 stated they used the enabler style bedrail to assist them in getting out of bed. On 03/13/26 at 3:33 p.m., the DON stated residents with bedrails were to be assessed when bedrails were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-17 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure TB testing, Flu, and Pneumonia immunizations were performed annually for 2 (#16 and #26) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for immunizations. The administrator identified 34 residents resided at the facility.Findings: 1. An admission assessment, dated 09/28/25, showed Resident #15 had a BIMS of 15 which indicated they were cognitively intact for daily decision making. The assessment showed diagnoses which included dementia. The assessment showed Resident #15 admitted to the facility 09/21/25. Review of the immunization record for Resident #16 showed they had not received their TB test on admission or their flu and pneumonia vaccinations annually. 2. A quarterly assessment, dated 02/12/26, showed Resident #26 had a BIMS of 15 and was cognitively intact for daily decision making. The assessment showed diagnoses which included lung cancer of the right lower lobe. The assessment showed Resident #26 re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to have an effective pest control program for the kitchen and failed to maintain the kitchen environment in an effort to promote an effective pest control program for the kitchen. The ADON stated 20 residents resided in the facility. Findings: The pest control service notification, dated 07/17/24, read in part, .Technician looked in pest control. [sic] Log and roaches were reported in break room and in dining room technician inspected, see no dead, no feces or live activity at time of service. Technician treated entryways, common areas. Offices, break room, dining room, nurses station, and kitchen with liquids. Inspected exterior bait stations, updated cards and replaced bait . On 08/04/24 at 9:17 a.m., an initial tour of the kitchen was performed and the following observations were made: - roaches in and around the low temperature dish machine; - missing baseboards in the dish room, dry storage room, and main kitchen areas; - standing water under the dish machine when not in use; - missing floor tiles in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-31 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the development of care plans to meet the residents' needs for three (#10, 13, and #26) of 13 residents whose records were reviewed. The facility failed to ensure a care plan was developed related to: a. schizoaffective disorder for Res #10 and #13. b. the use of diuretics, antianxiety, and anticoagulant use for Res #26. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 28 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Res #26 had diagnoses which included permanent atrial fibrillation, generalized anxiety disorder, and hypertension. A physician order, dated 08/06/22, documented the facility was to administer 2.5 mg of Eliquis (an anticoagulant medication) once daily for a diagnosis of permanent atrial fibrillation. A physician order, dated 09/14/22, documented the facility was to administer 40 mg of furosemide (a diuretic medication) once daily for a diagnosis of secondary hypertension. A quarterly assessment, dated 05/07/23, documented the resident was severely impaired in cognition;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-31 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's care plan was revised with new interventions to prevent falls and offered the resident's representative to participate in the care plan meetings for one (#22) of three residents reviewed for falls. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 28 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Res #22 had diagnoses which included dementia and DM. A care plan, dated 04/04/22, documented Problem: I am at increased risk for falls r/t my confusion, forgetfulness, impaired judgement and safety awareness, potential vision impairment. The documented interventions on the 04/04/22 care plan were for staff to keep the resident's bed in lowest position when they were in it, keep personal items and frequently used items within reach, ensure the resident was wearing their glasses when they were out of bed, and for staff to ensure the resident was wearing appropriate footwear when they were out of bed. An Event Report, dated 01/13/23 at 10:41 p.m., documented the resident was found on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received the care and adequate supervision to prevent falls for one (#22) of three residents reviewed for falls. MDS coordinator #1 documented 12 residents had fallen during the previous six months. Findings: Res #22 had diagnoses which included dementia, diabetes, benign prostatic hyperplasia, and diarrhea. A care plan, dated 04/04/22, documented the resident at increased risk for falls r/t confusion, forgetfulness, impaired judgement and safety awareness, potential vision impairment. The care plan, read in part, .DX Alzheimer's, glaucoma 02/08/22, I bumped my arm in the shower and obtained a skin tear. Tx orders written. 06/24/22 fall without injury. 06/30/22 I was found in my room, on my left side, laying next to my fall mat. No injury. 07/01/22 Witnessed fall in living room. No injury. 07/05/22 Unwitnessed non-injury fall. 07/7/22 I was found laying on my fall mat next to bed. I wanted to use the BR. No injury. 07/10/22 Unwitnessed non-injury fall. 07/16/22 Found on fall mat by bed. No…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-31 · tag F0700 — pattern
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to attempt appropriate alternatives prior to installing side or bed rails; conduct a thorough assessment for the need of a side/bed rail; failed to ensure the resident and/or resident representatives were educated related to risk of side rails; and the informed consent documented the required components for two (#7 and #13) of two residents whose beds were equipped with side/bed rails. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 28 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Res #7 was admitted on [DATE] at 5:19 p.m., and had diagnoses which included sequelae of cerebral infarction, abnormal finding of lung field, and hypertensive heart disease with heart failure. The EHR documented the resident was receiving hospice services from admission. A side rail assessment in the resident's EHR, dated 05/11/23, did not document the resident's size and weight, sleep habits, existence of delirium, cognition, communication, or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-07-31 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's medication was administered and not held without an order to hold based on blood pressure readings for one (#26) of five residents whose medications were reviewed. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 28 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Res #26 had diagnosis which included hypertension. A physician order, dated 08/06/22, documented the facility was to administer valsartan-hydrochlorothiazide 160-12.5 mg (a medication used to treat high blood pressure) two tablets daily for a diagnosis of hypertension. A quarterly assessment, dated 05/07/23, documented the resident was severely impaired with cognition and required limited to extensive assistance with most ADLs. A care plan, dated 08/18/22, documented the resident was at risk for decline or adverse consequences related to medications for hypertension. The care plan documented an approach to conduct an monthly pharmacy review. A pharmacist review, dated 09/09/22, documented a request for the physician to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-07-31 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure monthly consultant pharmacist were acted on for two (#8 and #26) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The Resident Census and Conditions of Resident's form documented 28 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Res #8 had diagnoses which included diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, recurrent depressive disorders, and hypertension. A physician order, dated 07/12/19, documented the facility was to administer five mg of amlodipine (a medication used to treat hypertension) daily for a diagnosis of hypertension. A Extended DRR Report, dated 09/10/22, documented a pharmacist recommendation to add hold parameters for blood pressure to the amlodipine order. The facility was not able to provide a physician response to the recommendation and the order remained unchanged. An Extended DRR Report, dated 10/07/22, documented Sliding scale insulin use is on the Beers Criteria List, no longer recommended in LTC setting due to higher risk of hypoglycemia without improvement in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-07-31 · tag F0849 — pattern
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to obtain the following information from the hospice services, the hospice care plan, election form, physician certification, hospice medication specific to the resident, the hospice physician orders, for one (#7) of one resident reviewed for hospice services. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented three residents who resided at the facility received hospice services. Findings: Res #7 was admitted on [DATE] and had diagnoses which included sequelae of cerebral infarction and nonspecific abnormal finding of lung field. A physician order, dated 05/15/23, documented to admit the resident to hospice care. An admission assessment, dated 05/17/23, documented the resident was severely impaired in cognition, required extensive to total assistance with ADLs, and was receiving hospice care. On 07/25/23 at 11:23 a.m., Res #7 was observed lying in bed. The resident appeared to be without pain and was unable to be interviewed. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-07-31 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to follow their QAPI program policy. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 28 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A facility policy titled Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program, revised in February 2020, read in part, .Key components of this process include: a. tracking and measuring performance; b. establishing goals and thresholds for performance measurements; c. identifying and prioritizing quality deficiencies; d. systematically analyzing underlying causes of systemic quality deficiencies; and f. monitoring or evaluating the effectiveness of corrective action/performance improvement activities, and revising as needed . On 07/31/23 at 6:12 p.m., the administrator was asked how the facility came up with areas of improvement to work on. The administrator stated the facility utilized areas of concern brought up in morning meetings, resident complaints, and environmental issues occurring in the facility. When asked about how data for QAPI issues was attained, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-31 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a DNR form was signed by an individual who was authorized to sign for a resident in the event the resident could no longer speak for themselves for one (#15) of one resident sampled for advanced directives. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 20 residents who resided in the facility had advanced directives. Findings: Res #15 had diagnoses which included diabetes, cerebrovascular disease, and depressive episodes. Res #15's DNR form, dated 10/04/19, was signed by an individual without POA authority to sign for Res #15. A quarterly assessment, dated 06/19/23, documented the resident was intact in cognition and required set up and supervision with most ADLs. On 07/27/23 at 12:30 p.m., the BOM stated Res #15 had been admitted to the facility prior to their starting employment at the facility. The BOM stated the resident was in their right mind and could sign for themselves. The BOM stated the individual who signed the DNR form was not the resident's POA.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-31 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident with mental illness diagnoses was referred to OHCA for a PASRR II evaluation on admission to the facility for one (#10) of two residents reviewed for PASRR II. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 10 residents residing in the facility had documented psychiatric diagnoses. Findings: Res #10 had diagnoses which included schizoaffective disorder, recurrent depressive disorders, conversion disorder, and mixed anxiety disorders. A physician order, dated 02/01/21, documented the facility was to administer five mg of aripiprazole (an antipsychotic medication) daily for a diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder. An annual assessment, dated 09/06/22, documented the resident currently was not considered by the state level II PASRR process to have serious mental illness and/or intellectual disability or a related condition. The assessment documented the resident was intact in cognition and received an antipsychotic, antianxiety, and antidepressant medication daily during the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to initiate and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to help prevent the development Legionellosis and Pontiac fever caused by Legionella bacteria. The Resident Census and Conditions of Resident form documented 28 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An undated policy, titled Reducing the Risk of Legionella in Facility Water Systems Policy, read in part, .The facility will complete the following steps to implement a Water Management Program that considers the ASHREA industry standard and the CDC toolkit. Establish a Water Management Program Team that will meet monthly as needed to address any issues that arise that could pose a threat to water safety. Describe the building water systems using text and flow diagrams. Conduct a facility risk assessment to identify where Legionella and other opportunistic waterborne pathogens could grow and spread in the facility water system. Decide where control measures should be applied and how to monitor them. Establish ways to intervene when control limits…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-31 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — isolated
    Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure regular inspection of all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails, if any, were conducted as part of a regular maintenance program to identify areas of possible entrapment. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 28 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. An admission assessment for Res #7, dated 05/17/23, documented the resident was receiving hospice care. A care plan approach, dated 05/22/23, documented the resident's bed would have side rails in place in bed to aide in repositioning and to define the edges of the bed. On 07/25/23 at 11:23 a.m., the resident was observed in their room in bed. The resident was awake and unable to be interviewed. The resident's bed was observed in the high position and full bed rails were observed in the up position on both sides of the resident's bed. The bed was observed to be equipped with a low air loss mattress. 2. A quarterly assessment for Res #13, dated 03/14/23, documented the resident was receiving hospice services. On 07/25/23…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$21,645 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $21,645 — penalty dated 2026-03-17
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-04-24 for 6 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to BGM ESTATE — 15 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 51.8+0.2 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.1-1.1 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.1+0.9 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 52.5+2.5 vs chain
The other 14 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.8★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
BGM ESTATE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST83%since 12/27/2020
MITCHELL, KELLYIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST17%since 12/27/2020
LOWRIMORE, MORGANIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 12/27/2020
TAYLOR, SANDRAIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 12/27/2020
BELT, MIRANDAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 12/09/2024
PITTS, JACIIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 12/09/2024

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$2.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-8.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$232K
Related-party expense10% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 77%Medicare 9%Other / private 14%

About 77% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $232K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$246per resident / day
operating cost
$7,488per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$228per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OK

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Oklahoma Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Oklahoma
$7,026/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,756/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,150/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 375276. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-17, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next