Choctaw Nation Nursing Home

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.46 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 77% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 72 beds and averages 24.9 residents a day — about 35% occupied, or roughly 47 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.07 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.68 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.81 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.04 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.09 on weekdays — 2% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.63 to 0.78 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 70% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Hcited before2024-02-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to assess for fall risk, update care plans related to falls, and educate staff related to resident falls for two (#1 and #11) of three residents who were reviewed for falls with major injury. Res #1 had a fall on 11/14/23 and sustained an abrasion to the head and on 12/07/23 Res #1 fell and sustained a closed head injury with a concussion. Res #11 had a fall on 04/28/23 and on 08/24/23 Res #11 had a fall resulting in a left femur fracture. No interventions were added or care plan updated after the falls for either resident. The administrator identified nine residents who have fallen in the last six months. Findings: A Falls - Evaluation and Prevention policy, dated 03/2015, read in part, .Residents should be evaluated for their fall risk: On admission/readmission to the facility, following a significant change in condition, quarterly, and following a fall .Upon admission, the nursing staff/interdisciplinary team should determine if a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-06-19 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
  Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure there was RN coverage 8 hours/day, 7 days/week. The DON identified 27 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A PBJ Staffing Data Report, dated 01/01/25 through 03/31/25 [the second quarter of fiscal year 2025], showed the facility did not have RN coverage on 9 of the 90 days in that quarter. The dates identified on the PBJ report as not having RN coverage in January, February, and March 2025 were 01/06/25, 01/13/25, 01/14/25, 01/27/25, 02/03/25, 02/11/25, 02/12/25, 02/17/25, and 03/31/25. A facility document titled Time Detail Report, dated 01/01/25 through 03/31/25, showed there was not a registered nurse on duty on 01/06/25, 01/13/25, 01/14/25, 01/27/25, 02/03/25, 02/11/25, 02/12/25, 02/17/25, and 03/31/25. On 06/17/25 at 2:08 p.m., the regional director of operations #2 stated they had reviewed their staffing records and found the PBJ report for the facility, for the first quarter of 2025, was accurate. They stated the facility had not had an RN on duty on 01/06/25, 01/13/25, 01/14/25, 01/27/25, 02/03/25,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-06-19 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — pattern
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was not prescribed an antipsychotic medication for a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease for 2 (#8 and #18) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The ADON stated there were 6 residents prescribed antipsychotic medications at the facility. Findings: A facility policy titled Antipsychotic Medication Use, dated July 2022, read in part, Residents will only receive antipsychotic medications when necessary to treat specific conditions for which they are indicated. 1. A physician's medication order for Res #8, dated 06/02/25, showed the resident had an order for Quetiapine [an antipsychotic medication] 25 mg at bedtime for the diagnosis of unspecified dementia, mild, with other behavioral disturbance. On 06/17/25 at 3:49 p.m., the DON reviewed Res #8's order for Quetiapine and stated the resident was being administered and antipsychotic medication. They stated the resident did not have a diagnosis that was approved for the use of Quetiapine. They stated the resident had been admitted to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-06-19 · tag F0638 — pattern
  Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure quarterly assessments were completed in the required time frame for 4 (#6, 16, 18, and #20) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for MDS assessments. The administrator stated 27 residents at the facility required MDS assessments. Findings: A facility policy titled Resident Assessment Instrument, dated October 2010, read in part, The Assessment Coordinator is responsible for ensuring that the Interdisciplinary Assessment Team conduct timely resident assessments and reviews according to the following schedule: a. Within fourteen (14) days of the resident's admission to the facility; b. When there has been a significant change in the resident's condition; c. At least quarterly; and d. Once every twelve (12) months. 1. On 06/17/25 at 3:06 p.m., Res #6's EMR was reviewed for MDS assessments. In the MDS section of the record, a list of assessments and their status showed Res #6's quarterly assessment, dated 04/04/25, was still in progress. 2. On 06/17/25 at 3:37 p.m., Res #18's EMR was reviewed for MDS assessments. In the MDS…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-19 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided with a written letter of transfer prior to being transferred to a hospital for 1 (#3) of 2 sampled residents that were reviewed for hospitalizations and discharges. The DON stated 24 residents had been transferred to a hospital in the past 6 months. Findings: A facility policy titled Admissions, Transfers, and Discharges, dated October 2022, read in part, Notice of Transfer is provided to the resident and representative as soon as practicable before the transfer and to the long-term care (LTC) ombudsman when practicable (e.g., in a monthly list of residents that includes all notice content requirements). A facility progress note, dated 01/12/25 at 12:45 p.m., showed the DON had assessed the vital signs of Res #3 and then sent the resident to an emergency room in the community. On 06/19/25 at 9:33 a.m., the DON was asked to explain the facility's process for sending someone to a hospital. They stated they gave clinical paperwork regarding the resident's condition and a copy of the bed hold…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-19 · tag F0636 — isolated
  Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an annual assessment had been completed in the time frame required for 1 (#12) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for MDS assessments. The administrator stated 27 residents at the facility required MDS assessments. Findings: A facility policy titled Resident Assessment Instrument, dated October 2010, read in part, The Assessment Coordinator is responsible for ensuring that the Interdisciplinary Assessment Team conduct timely resident assessments and reviews according to the following schedule: a. Within fourteen (14) days of the resident's admission to the facility; b. When there has been a significant change in the resident's condition; c. At least quarterly; and d. Once every twelve (12) months. On 06/17/25 at 3:36 p.m., Res #12's EMR was reviewed for MDS assessments. In the MDS section, a list of assessments and their status showed Res #12's annual assessment, dated 04/15/25, was still in progress. On 06/18/25 at 8:50 a.m. the administrator stated the former MDS coordinator had quit suddenly, and the facility did…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to follow infection control practices for enhanced barrier precautions for 1 (#29) of 1 sampled residents reviewed for enhanced barrier precautions. The DON identified three residents with enhanced barrier precautions. Findings: A facility policy titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions, revised March 2024, read in part, 1. Enhanced barrier precautions (EBPs) are used as an infection prevention and control intervention to reduce the transmission of multi-drug resistant organisms (MDROs) to residents. 2. EBPs employ targeted gown and glove use in addition to standard precautions during high contact resident care activities when contact precautions do not otherwise apply. An undated face sheet showed resident #29 had diagnoses which included nondisplaced comminuted fracture of shaft of the right femur, encounter for attention to gastrostomy, dysphagia, aphasia, and acute respiratory infection. A physician order, dated 05/02/23, showed the resident was to receive enteral feeding tube site care twice a day. A physician…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-19 · tag F0887 — isolated
  Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to educate/offer the COVID-19 vaccination for 1 (#15) of 5 sampled residents who were reviewed for vaccinations. The administrator identified 27 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: A facility policy titled Vaccination of Residents, read in part, All residents will be offered vaccines that aid in preventing infectious diseases unless the vaccine is medically contraindicated or the resident has already been vaccinated .Prior to receiving vaccinations, the resident or legal representative will be provided information and education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of the vaccinations .Provision of such education shall be documented in the resident's medical record. An undated face sheet showed Resident #15 had diagnoses which included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a cerebral infarction and an encounter for prophylactic measures. A facility form titled Preventive Health Care, showed Resident #15 did not receive the COVID-19 vaccine. On 06/18/25 at 4:09 p.m., the DON reviewed the immunization…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-02-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food for resident meals were stored in a safe and sanitary manner. The Long-Term Care Facility Application for Medicare and Medicaid form documented 25 residents lived in the facility. Findings: On 02/06/24 at 5:11 a tour of the kitchen area was conducted. A large metal bowl, covered with foil and dated with 02/04, was observed to contain raw hamburger meat, diced peppers and onions, and dried bread cubes. An unlabeled resealable plastic container with lid was observed to contain what appeared to have been raw chicken wings in sauce. A resealable plastic container, with a label documenting tuna salad with a date of 02/03 was observed. The container of tuna salad appeared to have been served out of. An undated and opened container of Hormel Thick and Easy drink was observed on the top shelf of the refrigerator. This container documented to dispose of the drink 10 days after opening. A second container of thickened drink was observed to have been opened and was undated. This container documented to dispose of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-02-14 · tag F0851 — widespread
  Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the information submitted on the PBJ was accurate. The Long-Term Care Facility Application for Medicare and Medicaid form documented 25 residents lived in the facility. Findings: A document titled PBJ staffing Data Report, dated Quarter 1 2023 (October 1 - December 31) documented one date in November of 2023 with no documented RN hours and three days in December 2023 with no RN hours documented. The report documented the facility failed to have licensed nursing coverage 24 hours a day for eight days in October 2023, six days in November, and 10 days in December of 2024. On 02/13/24 at 1:34 p.m., the administrator provided documentation the facility had RN coverage for at least eight consecutive hours on the days in question. At that time, the administrator stated they did not know why the PBJ was incorrect. The administrator stated they felt it was a problem with the accounting/payroll service who entered the facility data. On 02/14/24 at 10:49 a.m., the administrator was asked to clarify the documentation they…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-02-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure care plans were developed regarding medication for two (#11 and #19) and for skin lesions for one (#5) of fifteen residents whose care plans were reviewed. The administrator identified 25 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Res #11 had diagnoses which included dementia. A physician's order, dated 08/29/23, documented hydroxyzine 25mg 1/2 tablet twice a day. The comprehensive care plan for Res #11 did not include a care plan for use of a psychotropic (anti-anxiety) medication. On 02/14/24 at 2:57 p.m., the DON reported the medication should have been care planned. On 02/14/24 at 3:15 p.m., the MDS coordinator reported the anti-anxiety medication for Res #11 should have been care planned. 2. Res #5 had diagnoses which included rash and other nonspecific skin eruption. An annual assessment, dated 09/11/23, documented Res #5 was severely impaired in cognition, required extensive to total assistance with most ADLs, and was at risk for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$38,532 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $38,532 — penalty dated 2024-02-14

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to BGM ESTATE — 15 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 26 rows in the source record cover these 24 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 80% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $216K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OK