No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Focused Care at Summer Place

2485 S Major Dr, Beaumont, TX 77707 · For profit - Corporation · 132 certified beds · (409) 861-4611 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (409) 861-4611 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0605, F0609) — most recent Aug 20251 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$17,298 in federal fines
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (36) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $17,298 in federal fines (most recent 2025-05-21)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (63%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
6622 Phelan Blvd · (409) 860-5570 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
6795 Calder Ave · (409) 860-3909 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
910 S Major Dr · (409) 861-1899 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Perlstein Park, 800 Landis Dr · (409) 861-1929 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased7.9%15.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.3%3.0%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.3%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.8%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%2.4%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%3.3%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened1.6%14.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication25.6%18.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers12.3%3.8%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control3.8%13.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table6.4%9.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.8%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.0%88.0%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission22.2%25.7%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit8.6%12.3%12.0%better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

46.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 68 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

46.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.23U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.09hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 29% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF46.8%CMS range 37.5–55.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.7%CMS range 7.9–17.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified95.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened4.5%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.3%CMS range 4.3–12.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.951.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.17
RN hours/ resident / day
1.00
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.78
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.95
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.24
RN hoursweekends
63.2%
Total nursing turnover
80.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 132 beds and averages 93.0 residents a day — about 70% occupied, or roughly 39 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.95 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.17 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.78 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.57 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.10 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.14 to 0.24 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 63% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

20
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-08-28)
9
at the previous standard inspection (2024-07-31)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

36 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 25 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2025-05-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide assistive devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents. The facility failed to ensure CNA A utilized a mechanical lift and had assistance from another staff member during a bed to wheelchair transfer on 05/05/25 which resulted in Resident #1 having complaint of pain to the right ankle. An x-ray was conducted on 05/05/25 with the results of evidence of acute fracture of the right distal tibia (bone in the lower leg). The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) began on 05/05/25 and ended on 05/07/25. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the investigation began. This failure could place residents at risk for falls resulting in injury, pain, and hospitalization. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 05/19/25 indicated Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE]. His diagnoses included diagnoses included a wedge compression…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store and prepare food in accordance with professional standards for food safety in the facility's only kitchen. 1. The facility failed to ensure food items in the refrigerator were dated and labeled appropriately. 2. The facility failed to discard food stored in the refrigerator that should no longer be consumed. These failures could place residents at risk for food-borne illness and food contamination. The findings included: An observation of the facility's refrigerator on 04/14/26 beginning at 10:05 a.m. revealed the following: - A cylinder food container labeled salad with a use by 4/11/26. No other information was provided.- A cylinder food container labeled pasta with a use by 4/12/26. No other information was provided.- A cylinder food container labeled corn with item 4/2/26. No other information was provided.- A transparent, resealable plastic storage bag of food without any label or dates. During an interview and observation with [NAME] A on 04/14/26 at 10:07 a.m., [NAME] A began to remove the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices for one (Resident #1) of eleven residents reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to thoroughly document measurements of two skin openings on Resident #1's bilateral (both sides) buttocks and notify the MD or NP regarding two skin openings that were present on admission. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving necessary medical care and deterioration of the skin.Findings included: Review of Resident #1's face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old man admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (where your body does not make enough insulin or cannot use insulin properly leading to high blood sugar), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD - a progressive lung disease that blocks airflow, making breathing difficult),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-28 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status for 3 of 24 residents (Residents #27, #8 and #23) reviewed for nutrition. 1.The facility did not ensure dietary recommendations was implemented for Resident #27. 2.The facility failed to ensure orders for fortified oatmeal was implemented for Resident #8. 3.The facility failed to ensure Resident #23 had water in his cup to drink on 08/25/25. These failures could place residents at risk for decreased nutritional status, decline in health, serious illness, or hospitalization.Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #27's face sheet, dated 08/28/25, reflected Resident #27 was a [AGE] year-old female, readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included partial intestinal obstruction (partial blockage in the intestines that prevent food, stool, and gas from passing through normally). Record review of the order summary report dated 08/28/25 reflected…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-28 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the menu according to 2 of 3 resident councils and 1 of 1 meal (the lunch meal) reviewed. 1. The facility failed to follow the menu for the lunch meal served on 08/25/25. 2. The facility failed to serve what was printed on the residents' tray cards or posted in the kitchen as mentioned in resident council meetings held on 06/03/25 and 08/26/25. These failures could place residents who consume food prepared by the facility's kitchen at risk of not having their nutritional needs met and/or experiencing weight loss.Findings included: During an interview on 08/25/25 at 11:57 a.m., Resident #65 said she was tired of not getting what was printed on the menu. She said they hardly ever had what was printed on her tray card. During an interview on 08/25/25 at 12:10 p.m., CNA C said Resident #65 was correct. She said often what was written on their tray cards was not what was being served. CNA C said residents often got upset because of what was served versus what was supposed to have been served. She said she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-28 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide food that was palatable and served at an appetizing temperature for 2 of 23 residents (Resident #67 and Resident #87) and 1 of 1 lunch meals reviewed for palatability. The facility failed to provide food that was palatable and attractive to Resident #67 and Resident # 87, who complained the food was not good, cold, hard, and overcooked. This failure could place residents who ate food from the kitchen at risk of weight loss, altered nutritional status, and diminished quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #67's face sheet, dated 08/28/25, indicated a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease also known as COPD (a chronic lung disease that causes inflammation and narrowing of the airways, leading to airflow obstruction), anxiety (a feeling of fear, dread, and uneasiness), and Depression (a mood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 of 4 residents (Residents #30 and Resident #65) and 1 of 3 halls (Hall 100) reviewed for infection control practices. 1. The facility failed to ensure CNA O performed proper hand hygiene and glove changes when providing incontinent care to Resident #30 on 08/25/2025. 2. The facility failed to ensure the Maintenance Supervisor wore PPE when entering Resident #65's room on 08/27/25, who was on contact isolation for C. diff (a highly contagious bacterium that causes diarrhea). The facility failed to ensure the proper disinfectant cleaner was used to clean Resident #65's isolation room with C. diff. 3. The facility failed to ensure linen was not placed on top of the dirty linen barrel on Hall 100 on 08/26/2025. These failures…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident had the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for 1 of 24 residents (Resident #87) reviewed for reasonable accommodations. The facility failed to ensure Resident #87's call light was within reach while in bed on 08/25/2025. This failure could place residents at risk for a delay in assistance and a decreased quality of life.Findings include: Record review of Resident #87's face sheet dated 08/28/24, indicated a [AGE] year-old female who readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #87 had diagnoses of muscle weakness, lack of coordination, difficulty walking, and abnormalities of gait and mobility. Record review of Resident #87's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], indicated she was usually understood and usually understood others. The MDS assessment indicated Resident #87 had a BIMS score of 11, which indicated her cognition was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0576 — isolated
    Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident mail was delivered promptly and unopened for 1 of 10 residents (Resident #62) reviewed for communication. The facility failed to ensure that mail was delivered to Resident #62 unopened. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving mail in a prompt and private manner and could result in a loss of personal property, frustration, and loss of dignity for the residents who reside at the facility.Findings included:Record review of Resident #62's face sheet, dated 08/28/25, reflected Resident #62 was a [AGE] year-old female readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis which included COPD (chronic inflammatory lung disease that causes obstructed airflow from the lungs). Record review of Resident #62's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 07/23/25, reflected Resident #62 usually made herself understood, and usually understood others. Resident #62's BIMS score was 13, which reflected her cognition was intact. Record review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure PRN orders for psychotropic drugs were limited to 14 days for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary psychotropic drugs (Resident #9). The facility failed to ensure Resident #9's PRN Ativan (antianxiety medication) was discontinued within 14 days or reevaluated by the prescribing practitioner. This failure could place residents at risk of receiving unnecessary psychotropic medications with possible medication side effects, adverse consequences, decreased quality of life and dependence on unnecessary medications.Findings included: Record review of Resident #9's face sheet dated 08/28/25, indicated a [AGE] year-old female who initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #9 had diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (a progressive brain disorder that causes memory loss, confusion, and other cognitive decline), diabetes mellitus type 2 (chronic metabolic disorder characterized by high blood sugar levels), and dysphagia…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-28 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure assessments accurately reflected the resident status for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #94) reviewed for MDS assessment accuracy. The facility incorrectly coded Resident #94's discharge MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected Resident #94 was discharged to a short-term general hospital when the resident was discharged home. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving care and services to meet their needs. Findings included: Record review of Resident #94's face sheet, dated 08/28/25, reflected Resident #94 was a [AGE] year-old male readmitted to the facility om 05/29/25 with a diagnosis which included end stage renal failure (a condition in which the kidneys lose the ability to remove waste and balance fluids). Record review of Resident #94's discharge MDS assessment, dated 06/13/25, reflected in Section A2105 (discharge status) coding of 04 which means discharge to short term general hospital. Record review of Resident #94's physician…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 25 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident that included the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #99) reviewed for baseline care plans. The facility failed to develop a baseline care plan that addressed Resident #99's use of a wound VAC (machine that promotes wound healing by applying negative pressure to the wound area by helping to draw the edges together and remove excess fluid) to her right thigh wound. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving care and services to meet their needs.Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 08/28/2025 indicated Resident #99 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included non-pressure chronic ulcer of unspecified part of right lower leg with unspecified severity (wound of the right lower leg not caused by pressure). Record review of Resident #99's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for 2 of 24 residents (Resident #8 and Resident #9) reviewed for care plans. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #8's care plan included her fall on 04/03/25 and interventions.2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #9's care plan included the antianxiety medication prescribed for her anxiety. These failures could have placed residents at risk for not having their needs met. Findings included: 1.Record review of Resident #8's face sheet dated 09/03/25 indicated she was a [AGE] year-old female who re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses history of falls, dementia (group of conditions that cause a decline in cognitive abilities), anxiety, and high blood pressure.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living, received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for 1 of 24 residents (Residents #63) reviewed for ADL care.The facility failed to ensure Resident #63 was assisted with her personal hygiene to ensure she was free of body odor and had a clean gown on 08/25/2025. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving services or care, decreased quality of life, and decreased self-esteem.Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 08/28/2025 indicated Resident #63 was a [AGE] year-old female initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following other cerebrovascular disease affecting right dominant side (weakness and paralysis to the right side of the body caused by a medical condition that affects the blood vessels and circulation of the brain)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 4 (Resident #99) residents reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #99's wound treatment to her right posterior thigh was performed on 08/22/2025. This failure could place residents of risk for not receiving appropriate care and treatment, a decreased quality of life, and wound deterioration.Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 08/28/2025 indicated Resident #99 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included non-pressure chronic ulcer of unspecified part of right lower leg with unspecified severity (wound of the right lower leg not caused by pressure). Record review of Resident #99's Comprehensive MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated she was usually understood by others and usually understood others. The MDS assessment indicated Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-28 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needed respiratory care was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's goals and preferences for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #67) reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #67's oxygen was set at 3 liters per nasal cannula as ordered on 08/28/25. This failure could place residents who receive respiratory care at risk of developing respiratory complications and a decreased quality of care.Findings included: Record review of Resident #67's face sheet, dated 08/28/25, indicated a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease also known as COPD (a chronic lung disease that causes inflammation and narrowing of the airways, leading to airflow obstruction), anxiety (a feeling of fear, dread,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure dialysis services were provided consistently with professional standards of practice for 1 of 2 resident reviewed for dialysis services. (Resident #7) The facility did not provide ongoing assessments after Resident #7's dialysis treatments and did not keep ongoing communication with the dialysis facility. This failure could place residents who received dialysis at risk for complications and not receiving proper care and treatment to meet their needs.Findings included: Record review of Resident #7's face sheet dated 08/28/25 indicated he was an [AGE] year-old male who re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of end stage renal disease (disease in which the kidneys lose ability to remove waste and balance fluids), dementia (a group of conditions that cause a decline in cognitive abilities, such as memory), high blood pressure, and heart failure. Record review of Resident #7's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] indicated he was usually…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-28 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that assure the accurate dispensing and administering of all drugs and biologicals to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 10 residents (Resident #91) and 1 of 2 medication rooms reviewed for pharmacy services. 1. The facility failed to reorder Resident #91's hydrocodone 7.5/325mg (pain medication) tablet timely resulting in Resident #91 having 3 days without medication. 2. The facility did not ensure the plastic bag of Lorazepam 2mg/ml (antianxiety medication) syringes in the station 2 refrigerator we reconciled. These failures could place the residents at risk of not having medications available for use, drug diversion, not receiving their medications as ordered, and exacerbation of their disease processes. Findings included: 1.Record review of Resident #91's face sheet dated 08/27/25 indicated she was a [AGE] year-old female who re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure that all drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled and stored in accordance with professional standards for 1 of 24 residents (Resident #23) and 1 of 10 medication carts (Station 1 Medication Cart) reviewed for drugs and biologicals. 1. The facility failed to ensure MA P secured the Station 1 Medication Cart, when it was not in use and unattended on 08/25/2025. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #23 did not have a container of zinc oxide, a package of hydrocortisone cream, and a 30-milliliter medicine cup filled with white cream in his room on the bedside table. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving drugs and biologicals as needed, medication errors, medication misuse, and drug diversion.Findings included: 1. During an observation on 08/25/2025 starting at 1:18 PM, the Station 1 Medication Cart was unlocked an unattended on the hall. There were residents nearby the unlocked medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed ensure each resident received and the facility provides food that accommodates residents' food preferences for 1 of 24 residents (Resident #6) reviewed for food preferences and the accommodation of resident's meal choices. The facility did not honor Resident #6's preference for fruit punch on 08/25/25 and 08/26/25. This failure could result in a decrease in resident choices, diminished interest in meals, and weight loss. Findings included: Record review of Resident #6's face sheet, dated 08/28/25, reflected Resident #6 was a [AGE] year-old female, readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis which included cerebral palsy (group of conditions that affect movement and posture). Record review of Resident #6's significant change in status MDS assessment, dated 06/20/25, reflected Resident #6 usually made herself understood, and usually understood others. Resident #6's BIMS score was 15, which indicated her cognition was intact.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0807 — failed to offer suitable drinks — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides drinks consistent with resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain resident hydration.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide liquids consistent with the resident's needs for 1 of 23 (Resident #83) residents reviewed for liquid inconsistency. The facility did not ensure that staff served Resident #83 her 8-ounce water during her lunch meal on 08/26/25. This failure could place residents at risk for dehydration and loss of interest in eating. Findings included: Record review of Resident #65's face sheet, dated 08/28/25, indicated she was an [AGE] year-old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted [DATE] with diagnoses which included Diabetes mellitus (a group of diseases that affect how the body uses blood sugar).COPD, or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a condition caused by damage to the airways or other parts of the lung), and Heart failure (occurs when the heart muscle doesn't pump blood as well as it should). Record review of the order summary report dated 08/28/25 indicated Resident #83 had the following orders: *Carb…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed. The facility failed to maintain proper kitchen sanitation when [NAME] D went outside the kitchen and returned without proper hand hygiene protocols. This deficient practice could place residents who were served from the kitchen at risk for health complications and foodborne illnesses.Findings included: During an observation on 08/27/25 at 11:30 a.m., [NAME] D had some keys on the kitchen counter. [NAME] D removed her keys from the kitchen counter to a container that contained individualized packages of sugar, salt, and pepper. [NAME] D then picked up her keys and went outside the kitchen, and returned without hand hygiene. [NAME] D went over to the counter where another staff member was preparing drinks for the residents, and put her hands near the glasses, and was about to help the other staff member when stopped by the state surveyor. During an interview on 08/27/25 at 11:45…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to collaborate with hospice representatives and coordinate the hospice care planning process for each resident receiving hospice services, to ensure quality of care for the resident, ensuring communication with the hospice medical director, the resident's attending physician, and others participating in the provision of care for 2 of 5 residents (Residents #'s 4 and 12) reviewed for hospice services. 1. The facility failed to obtain Resident #4's most recent updated hospice plan of care. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #12's hospice records were a part of their records in the facility. These deficient practices could place residents at-risk of receiving inadequate end-of-life care due to a lack of documentation, coordination of care and communication of resident needs.Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #4's face sheet, dated 08/27/25, indicated a [AGE] year-old female who readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with the professional standards for food service safety 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for safety requirements.1. The facility failed to ensure spoiled strawberries were not stored in the walk-in cooler. 2. The facility failed to ensure raw meat was not stored on top of ready to eat green apples in the walk-in cooler. 3. The facility failed to ensure food items in the freezer #1, #2 and dry pantry were labeled, dated and sealed. These failures could place residents, who received food and beverages from the kitchen, at risk for health complications, foodborne illnesses, and decreased quality of life.Findings included:During observation and interview in the kitchen on 07/22/25 with the DM at 10:20 a.m. of the walk-in cooler indicated there were:on the first shelf were four unopened, clear 30-ounce containers, each containing strawberries that had a gray hairy like coating. The DM said she did not know when the strawberries arrived, and it looked like…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-21 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to retain and use personal possessions for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for personal property. LVN B took Resident #2's personal cell phone away from her on 11/9/2024 and it was out of Resident #2's possession until the next shift arrived. This failure could place residents at risk of being deprived of their ability to use personal cell phone. Findings included: Record review of the undated face sheet indicated Resident #2 was an [AGE] year-old female that admitted [DATE] with diagnoses that including: Metabolic encephalopathy (problems with a patient's metabolism causes brain dysfunction with causes ranging from low blood sugar to excess fluid in the brain. Symptoms may cause confusion or coma.), Dementia (conditions characterized by impairment of at least two brain functions, such as memory loss and judgment), and Generalized Anxiety Disorder (excessive and uncontrollable worry about events or activities that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an incident of possible injury of unknown origin or neglect immediately, but no later 2 hours after the allegation is made if the events that caused the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or no later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse to the State Agency in accordance with State law for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for incidents. The facility failed to report to State Agency when Resident #1 was located in the visitor bathroom, deceased and a possible head injury, on [DATE]. This failure to report could place the residents at risk for unreported allegations of neglect and injuries of unknow origin not being investigated due to not reporting. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's physician's orders dated [DATE] indicated Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE], was an [AGE] year-old female, and had diagnoses of cerebral infarction (a condition where part of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-31 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received and the facility provided food prepared by methods that conserve nutritive value, flavor, and appearance and were palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature for 1 of 1 kitchen. The facility did not ensure the oatmeal and bread served for breakfast on 07/30/24 was palatable and the oatmeal recipe was followed. The facility did not ensure the Spanish rice served at the noon meal on 7/30/24 was palatable and the recipe was followed. These failures could place the residents at risk of a decline in their satisfaction and weight loss. Findings included: During confidential interviews on initial rounds on 7/29/24 from 8:30 a.m. to 11:15 a.m., the residents complained about the food being bland and not having flavor. A family member complained that the pureed food was too thick, and they had to add soup to thin it for the resident to be able to eat it. 1.During an observation and interview on 07/30/24 at 8:53 a.m., the pureed test tray contained bread, oatmeal and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-31 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs of each resident for 1 of 1 kitchen. The facility did not ensure the pureed oatmeal and bread served for breakfast on 07/30/24 was in the correct food form. This failure could place the residents at risk of choking. Findings included: During a confidential interview on initial rounds on 7/29/24 at 10:03 a.m., a family member complained that the pureed food was too thick, and they had to add soup to thin it for the resident to be able to eat it. During an observation and interview on 07/30/24 at 8:53 a.m., revealed the pureed test tray contained bread, oatmeal and scrambled eggs. The pureed oatmeal was thick, had large lumps, stuck to the spoon when the spoon was lifted out of the oatmeal and was bland. The bread was thick, dry, stuck to the palate upon tasting and was bland. The DM said the oatmeal and the bread were too thick, the oatmeal had lumps, and the food items were bland. She said the possible negative outcome of the pureed food not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 3 of 19 residents (Residents #47, #51, & #70) reviewed for incontinent care. CNA E and CNA F did not sanitize/wash their hands between glove changes before, during, and after incontinent care for Residents #47 & #51. CNA H did not change gloves, sanitize/wash her hands between glove changes, touched clean items with dirty gloves, and did not completely clean Resident #70 when providing incontinent care. These failures could place residents at risk of exposure to communicable diseases and infections. Findings included: 1. Record review of a face sheet dated 07/30/24 indicated Resident #47 was an [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included dementia (the loss of cognitive functioning-thinking,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-31 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure assessments accurately reflected the status for 1 of 19 residents reviewed for assessments. (Resident #70). The facility failed to complete an accurate resident assessment for Resident #70. Resident #70's resident assessment did not reflect that she received an antidepressant medication. This failure could place residents at risk of not having individual needs met and a decreased quality of life. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 07/30/24 indicated Resident #70 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included anxiety disorder (persistent and excessive worry that interferes with daily activities) and depression (mental illness that negatively affects how you feel, the way you think and how you act). Record review of the July 2024 physician orders indicated Resident #70 had an order dated 03/13/24 for Paroxetine (antidepressant) 20 mg daily for anxiety . Record review of MDS dated [DATE] indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-31 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan to meet each resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs for 2 of 19 residents reviewed for care plans. (Residents #59 and #70) The facility did not have a care plan to address Resident #59's nausea and vomiting. The facility did not have a care plan to address Resident #70's incontinence of bowel and bladder. This failureThe failures could place residents at risk of not having individual needs met and not receiving needed services. Findings included: 1. Record review of the face sheet dated 07/31/24 indicated Resident #59 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included malignant neoplasm of the bone (bone cancer). Record review of an MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #59 had a BIMS of 11 indicating she had moderately impaired cognition. Record review of physician's orders for July 2024 indicated Resident #59 had an order…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-31 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who needed respiratory care was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for respiratory care and services. (Resident #292) The facility failed to administer BIPAP (a machine that can help people breathe when they have trouble breathing due to health issues) therapy as ordered by the physician for Resident #292. This failure could place the residents at risk of not receiving the appropriate care and services to maintain their highest level of well-being. Findings included: Record review of physician orders dated July 2024 indicated Resident #292, admitted [DATE], was a [AGE] year-old female with a diagnosis of acute respiratory failure (a condition that occurs when the lungs cannot release enough oxygen into the blood to remove carbon dioxide {a waste product that your body…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-31 · tag F0710 — isolated
    Obtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a physician, physician assistant, nurse practitioner, or clinical nurse specialist provided orders for the resident's immediate care and needs for 1 of 19 residents reviewed for physician services. (Resident #59) LVN D notified the on-call NP of Resident #59 having nausea and vomiting and the on-call NP did not provide an order for the resident's need. This failure could place residents at risk of not having individual immediate needs met and a decreased quality of life. Findings included: Record review of the face sheet dated 07/31/24 indicated Resident #59 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included malignant neoplasm of the bone (bone cancer). Record review of an MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #59 had a BIMS of 11 indicating she had moderately impaired cognition. Record review of physician's orders for July 2024 indicated Resident #59 had an order dated 02/05/24 for outpatient…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-31 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 8 residents reviewed for medication administration. (Resident #59) LVN D did not administer prn nausea medication ordered for Resident #59 when she requested the medication. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving the desired therapeutic effects of medications and decreased quality of life. Findings included: Record review of the face sheet dated 07/31/24 indicated Resident #59 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included malignant neoplasm of the bone (bone cancer). Record review of an MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #59 had a BIMS of 11 indicating she had moderately impaired cognition. Record review of physician's orders for July 2024 indicated Resident #59 had an order…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-31 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments under proper temperature controls, and permit only authorized personnel to have access, for 3 of 3 medications reviewed for security. The facility did not ensure Plavix (antiplatelet), Lasix (medication used to remove fluid from the body), and Lexapro (antidepressant) were stored securely when the medications were left unattended at the nursing station. This failure could place residents at risk of harm by misappropriation of property and drug diversion. Findings included: During an observation on 07/30/24 at 04:57 a.m., medications received from the pharmacy in a pharmacy bag was left at the 100/200 Halls nurses' station unattended and no staff was in eyesight. The medication was accessible to staff, residents or visitors. During an observation on 07/30/24 at 05:03 a.m., LVN D returned to the nurses' station and did not address the medications on the desk. During an observation on 07/30/24 at 05:05 a.m., LVN D left the nurses' station to answer a call…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-24 · tag F0640 — isolated
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to electronically transmit encoded, accurate, and complete MDS data to the CMS System within 14 days after the facility completed the resident's assessment for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for MDS assessments. (Resident #70) The facility failed to transmit to the CMS system Resident #70's discharge MDS assessment dated [DATE]. This failure could place the residents at risk for not having the MDS assessment transmitted as required. Findings included: During an interview and record review on 05/24/23 at 04:15 PM an admission MDS dated [DATE] indicated Resident #70 admitted on [DATE]. The discharge MDS indicated she was discharged on 02/02/23. The discharge MDS in Resident 70's EMR indicated the status was Exported. The MDS Nurse and the Corporate MDS Nurse said a completed and transmitted MDS would have Accepted under the status. They said since she was discharged it was not looked at again by them. They said it was their responsibility to ensure the MDSs were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$17,298 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $17,298 — penalty dated 2025-05-21

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to FOCUSED POST ACUTE CARE PARTNERS — 25 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 51.9-0.9 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.1-0.1 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.2-0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.0≈ chain avg
The other 24 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.9★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
ABERNATHY, MARYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 05/01/2024
HUMPHREY, ERICIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 05/01/2024
LEGG, STEPHENIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 05/05/2022
MCKENZIE, MARKIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 05/01/2021
TINNERMAN, LINDAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 12/15/2020
TURNER, LESLIEIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 03/15/2017
COOPER, KIMBERLYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/29/2024
NEWTON, ELIZABETHIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 05/01/2021
CHAMBERS COUNTY PUBLIC HOSPITAL DISTRICT NO. 1OrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 05/01/2021
FOCUSED POST ACUTE CARE PARTNERS LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2021
FOCUSED POST ACUTE CARE PARTNERS MANAGEMENT, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2021
FPACP BEAUMONT LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2021
CONLEY, SHAWNIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 05/01/2021
DANIEL, TOMMIEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/13/2025
LEVINE, MSONTHIIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/20/2019
STRUBBE, LORETTAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 05/01/2021
WILSON, STEPHANIEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/09/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 25 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-12.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$364K
Related-party expense4% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 79%Medicare 4%Other / private 17%

About 79% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $364K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$268per resident / day
operating cost
$8,160per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$238per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Texas
$5,627/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,666/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 676210. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-28, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next