No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Focused Care at Hogan Park

3203 Sage St, Midland, TX 79705 · Government - Hospital district · 106 certified beds · (432) 683-5403 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (432) 683-5403 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Resident-funds citation (F0567)1 actual-harm citation$9,110 in federal fines
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567)
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (45) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $9,110 in federal fines (most recent 2026-02-27)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (63%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
10 Desta Dr · (432) 617-7463 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
3200 N Big Spring St · (432) 685-7008 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
2208 N Big Spring St · (432) 682-2117 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1201 E Wadley Ave · (432) 685-7356 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
East Side0.3 mi
 

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased7.7%15.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight1.7%3.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.3%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.7%0.8%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%2.4%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.5%3.3%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened1.6%14.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication23.0%18.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.9%3.8%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control7.1%13.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table24.8%9.6%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication10.5%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine85.2%88.0%79.4%typical

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

10.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.19U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.02hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.13hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.19 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 19% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.5%CMS range 6.7–15.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.021.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.38
RN hours/ resident / day
0.67
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.32
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.37
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.31
RN hoursweekends
63.0%
Total nursing turnover
77.8%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 106 beds and averages 77.6 residents a day — about 73% occupied, or roughly 28 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.37 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.38 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.32 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.15 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.46 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.40 to 0.31 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 63% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

6
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-01-16)
16
at the previous standard inspection (2023-12-08)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

45 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 34 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2026-02-27 · tag F0773 — isolated
    Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to promptly notify the physician or physician's representative when laboratory results fell outside of the clinical reference range in accordance with facility policies and procedures for 1 (Resident #1) of 6 residents reviewed for lab services. The facility failure to relay the test results from Resident #1 to the physician as per facility Lab Monitoring & Lab Orders Policies and Procedures. The failure placed residents at risk of delays in receiving the necessary interventions to treat their medical condition. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's admission record, dated 02/10/2026, revealed admission on [DATE], to the facility. Record review of Resident #1's history and physical dated 01/29/26, revealed a [AGE] year-old male with a diagnosis of Schizoaffective Disorder, Bipolar Type, Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, and Constipation. There was no indication of Diabetes Mellitus noted. Record review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS assessment,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-12 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the assessment accurately reflected the residents' status for 2 of 6 residents (Resident #3 and Resident #4) whose assessments were reviewed:Resident #4's quarterly MDS did not accurately reflect the resident's level of consciousness.This failure could place residents at risk for inadequate care due to inaccurate assessments. Findings included:Resident #4Record review of Resident #4's admission Record dated 11/06/25, revealed admission on [DATE] and a readmission on [DATE]. Resident #4 was a [AGE] year-old male with diagnoses of heart failure and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.Record review of Resident #4's MDS dated [DATE], revealed: Section B-Hearing, Speech, and Vision; and B0100 Comatose, Persistent vegetative state with a code of 1. Yes-Skip to GG0100. This error resulted in sections C. Cognitive Patterns (BIMS), D. Mood, and E. Behavior to be skipped. Observation on 10/29/25 at 1:25 PM, revealed Resident #4 in his wheelchair,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-12 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure medical records, in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, were maintained on each resident that were accurately documented for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for medical records. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3's Safe Smoking Assessment record did not accurately document the resident's smoking status. This failure could place residents at risk of inaccurate records with the potential for inadequate care and treatment. Record review of Resident #3's admission Record dated 11/06/25, revealed admission to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #3 was a [AGE] year-old female with diagnoses of acute respiratory failure and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (a disease in which the body does not control the amount of sugar in the blood and kidneys).Record review of Resident #3's MDS dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS score of 10, indicating moderate cognitive impairment.Record review of Resident #3's care plan dated 10/09/25,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 (Resident #6) of 3 residents reviewed for infection control. 1. The facility failed to ensure CNA A, and the Treatment Nurse turned the water faucets off with a paper towel after washing hands while providing wound care to Resident #6.2. The facility failed to ensure the Treatment Nurse used each 4X4 gauze once while performing wound care to Resident #6. These failures could place residents at risk for cross contamination and the spread of infection. Findings include:Record review of Resident #6's admission record dated 10/29/25, indicated a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a readmission on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Type 2 Diabetes Mellitis (a disease in which the body does not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for dietary services. - The facility failed to ensure that prepared food stored in the refrigerator was labeled and dated. - The facility failed to ensure that lids were sealed on spices kept in the dry storage room. - The facility failed to ensure that food stored in the refrigerator and dry storage room was in sealed containers. - The facility failed to ensure the overall cleanliness and sanitation of the kitchen and its storage areas. The findings included: Observation of the kitchen on 01/14/25 from 9:28 AM -10:32 AM revealed the following: - juice machine spigot/holder with red liquid collecting in bottom of holder and red buildup at mouth of holder that was sticky to touch - floors visibly dirty throughout kitchen and dry storage area (food and other debris noted on the floor in all areas); - one large metal bowl with clear plastic wrap cover containing yellow food…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-16 · tag F0563 — failed to protect the right to visitors — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to receive visitors of his or her choosing, at the time of his or her choosing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents maintained the right to receive visitors of his or her choosing at the time of his or her choosing for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to ensure all residents had the right to receive visitors between 9:00 PM and 9:00 AM. This deficient practice placed residents at risk of isolation, decreased emotional well-being, and diminished quality of life. The findings included: Observation on 01/14/2025 at 9:00 am revealed a sign on the front door entrance that read Resident visiting hours: 9:00 AM to 9:00 PM. For the safety of our residents and in order for the staff to take care of the residents and the residents to have a quiet time of rest, visiting hours are from 9:00 AM to 9:00 PM During a confidential resident council meeting on 01/15/2025 at 1:45 PM Ombudsman stated that the administrator had been informed multiple times that the visiting hours posting was not within regulation standards. Ombudsman stated that the administrator was aware of the regulation and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-16 · tag F0576 — pattern
    Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide reasonable access to the use of a telephone for residents to have private conversations for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to provide the residents a telephone where they could talk without being overheard. This deficient practice placed residents at risk of isolation, decreased emotional well-being, and diminished quality of life. Findings included: In a confidential group interview with 6 residents on 01/15/2025 at 1:30 pm, it was revealed that resident's conversations can be overheard. During the interview it was revealed resident's do not have a dedicated phone for them to make phone calls. They are allowed to use the phones at the nurse's station and at the front reception area. The resident's stated they do not like to use these telephones because they are located in an area that is not private and their conversations can be overheard. In an interview on 01/16/2025 at 12:47 pm the DON stated that there had not been a designated phone for resident's since she was hired in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-16 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure personal privacy was provided for 2 (#23 and #37) of 3 residents reviewed for dignity. The facility failed to ensure staff treated Resident #23 with respect and dignity while performing wound care ensuring the door was closed and without the privacy curtain being closed all the way on 01/15/2025. CNA A did not close the window blind while providing incontinent care for Resident #37 on 01/16/2025. These failures could place residents at risk for diminished quality of life and loss of dignity and self-worth. The findings included: Record Review of Resident #23's face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old male, who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a pertinent diagnoses of spinal stenosis-cervical region (narrowing of the spinal canal, compressing the nerves traveling through the lower back into the legs), functional quadriplegia (a condition that causes a person to be completely unable to move due to a severe disability or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to dispose of garbage and refuse properly for 3 of 6 dumpsters reviewed for food and nutrition services. - The facility failed to ensure that 2 of 6 dumpsters were placed on a concrete slab. - The facility failed to ensure that the area surrounding the dumpsters was free of garbage and other debris. - The facility failed to ensure dumpster doors for 3 of 6 dumpsters were when no staff were disposing of garbage . These failures could lead to an unsanitary environment and encourage the presence of pests. The findings included: Observation on 01/15/25 at 12:53 PM revealed a row of six commercial size dumpsters at the rear of the facility. Dumpster #1 was placed on dirt and a puddle was noted under the back corner with mud, loose garbage, and an odor coming from the water. Dumpster #1 did not sit flat and even - the rear, left corner of the dumpster was angled into the puddle. It could not be determined if the puddle had developed from the drain in the dumpster or recent snow. Dumpster #6 was placed on dirt and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 (#21) of 2 residents reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure the Wound Care nurse used PPE during wound care for Residents #21 as the resident was on EBP precautions. These failures could place resident's risk for cross contamination and the spread of infection. Findings included: Record review of Resident #21's admission record dated 01/16/2025 indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included dementia, muscle wasting and atrophy, and heart failure. She was [AGE] years of age. Record review of Resident #21's MDS dated [DATE] indicated in part: BIMS = 5 indicating resident had severe impairment. Section M - Skin conditions = Resident has a pressure ulcer/injury, a scar over bony…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-23 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide services with reasonable accommodation of needs for 1 of 11 (Resident #1) residents reviewed for resident call system. The facility failed to provide a working communication system on 10/23/2024 that was easily at reach and that would allow Resident #1 the ability to safely call for staff for assistance. This failure could place residents at risk of not having a means of directly contacting caregivers in an emergency or when they need support for daily living. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's admission record dated 10/23/24 revealed Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old male with an admission date of 09/27/2018. Medical diagnosis that included spinal stenosis (the narrowing of the space around your spinal cord or nerves), muscle weakness, muscle wasting, and quadriplegia (paralysis of both arms and legs). Record review of Resident #1's MDS dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 11…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 34 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-19 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality for 7 of 10 residents (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, Resident #5, and Resident #6) reviewed for residents rights The facility failed to ensure that staff were answering call lights in a prompt manner. This failure could place residents at risk of decreased feelings of self-worth. Findings include: Record review of Resident #1's electronic face sheet, dated 7/19/24 revealed he was a [AGE] year-old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include iron deficiency anemia (is a common type of anemia. Anemia is a condition in which blood doesn't have enough healthy red blood cells to carry oxygen throughout the body), bipolar disorder (is a mental illness that causes unusual shifts in a person's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-08 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to manage the personal funds of the residents deposited with the facility for 6 of 6 confidential residents reviewed for personal funds. The facility failed to ensure Residents from a confidential group interview had ready access to their personal funds on the weekends. This failure could place residents whose funds were managed by the facility of not receiving funds deposited with the facility and not having their rights and preferences honored. The findings included: During a confidential group interview on 12/07/2023 at 09:28 a.m., 6 confidential residents complained of only able to access funds on weekdays and not having access to funds on the weekends. During an interview on 12/07/2023 at 10:00 a.m., [NAME] stated residents asked for funds needed on the weekends on the Friday prior to her leaving for the day. [NAME] stated there was no way for residents to have access to funds on weekends. During an interview on 12/08/2023 at 11:32 a.m., ADMN stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-08 · tag F0582 — pattern
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident was informed before, or at the time of admission, and periodically during the residents stay, of services available in the facility and of changes for those services, which included changes for services not covered under Medicare/Medicaid or by the facility's per diem rate for 3 of 3 residents (Resident #45, #263 and #24) reviewed for Medicare/Medicaid coverage. The facility failed to ensure Residents #45, #263 and #24 were given a completed SNF ABN (a notice given to Medicare beneficiaries to transfer financial liability to the beneficiary before the SNF provides an item or service that would usually be paid for by Medicare, but Medicare was not likely to provide coverage because care was not medically reasonable and necessary, or was custodial in nature) when discharged from skilled services at the facility prior to covered days being exhausted. These failures could place residents at risk for not being aware of changes to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that included measurable objectives and time frames to meet residents' mental and psychosocial needs for 3 of 5 (Resident # 2, Resident #21 and Resident #25) residents reviewed for care plan completion. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2, Resident #21, and Resident #25, comprehensive care plans had measurable objectives and time frames identified to meet residents needs. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving appropriate supervision. Findings included: Resident #2 Record review of Resident #2's electronic face sheet dated 12/08/2023 revealed resident was a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Paranoid Schizophrenia, Stroke , history of falls, anxiety, muscle weakness, psychotic disorder with delusions, hallucinations, and cognitive communication deficit. Review of Resident #2's Quarterly MDS dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 5 of 7 (Residents #2, #20, #25, #45 and #262) residents reviewed for smoking safety. The facility failed to ensure Residents #21 assessed as supervised smokers were supervised when smoked. The facility failed to ensure Residents #2, #21, #25, #45, and #262 lighters and cigarettes were not stored on their person. These failures could affect residents who smoke at risk of serious bodily harm, physical impairment, or death. The findings included: Resident #1 Record review of Resident #2's electronic face sheet dated 12/08/2023 revealed resident was a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Paranoid Schizophrenia, Stroke, history of falls, anxiety, muscle weakness, psychotic disorder with delusions, hallucinations, and cognitive communication deficit. Review of Resident #2's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed: Section C- Cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments under proper temperature controls and permit only authorized personnel to have access to medications in medication cart 1 of 4 and in 2 of 2 medication rooms , and 2 biohazard rooms reviewed for label and storage of drugs and biologicals. The facility failed to ensure medication cart #1 was locked when unattended on 12/5/2023. The facility failed to ensure discontinued medication was locked in medication rooms. This failure could place residents at risk of having access to unauthorized medications and/or lead to possible harm or drug diversions. Findings included: During an observation and interview on 12/05/2023 at 1:30PM the medication cart was left unattended and unlocked by LVN E. The LVN E was observed looking at her phone sitting at the nurses station while the surveyors were at the unlocked medication cart opening the drawers. The LVN E stated it was her cart and she had left it unlocked. The LVN E proceeded to leave the nurses station and walked to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-08 · tag F0801 — pattern
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies, and skills set to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service for 1 of 1 (DM) reviewed for qualified dietary staff. The facility failed to ensure the facility's DM met the requirements for a certified dietary manager. This failure could place residents at risk of not having their nutritional needs met and placed them at risk for food born illnesses. Findings included: Record Review of the DM's employee file on 12/06/2023 revealed a hire date of 10/127/2023 as the DM. There was no documented evidence of a Dietary Manager Certificate found in the file. During an interview on 12/07/2023 at 2:00 PM the DM stated she had not started on her dietary manager certification. The DM stated she had been the DM over a month and had not been given a time frame to complete her DM certification. During an interview on 12/08/23 at 9:24 AM the ADMN stated her expectation would have been completed within 90 days, she stated she was not aware of what regulation or policy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to properly store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed. The facility failed to ensure foods were sealed and/or labeled properly in refrigerators. The facility failed to ensure storage of ice scoop with handle was outside of ice cooler. These failures could place residents that eat out of the kitchen at risk for food borne illnesses. Findings included: Observation on 12/05/2023 between 8:50 AM and 9:30 AM revealed: Refrigerator #1 1. An open container of Sour Cream with a use by date of 10/11/2023 2. Two bags of shredded carrots with a use by date of 11/19/2023 3. A plastic bag with a zipper that was not sealed with no description or an open date. Freezer #1 1. 14 packages of hot dog buns with use by date of 9/07/2023 2. 1 package of hamburger buns with a preparation date of 10/13/2023 3. 1 package of hamburger buns with a preparation date of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-08 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident, in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, that were complete and accurate for 3 (Resident #21, Resident #25 and Resident #262) of 5 residents reviewed for resident records. The facility failed to ensure smoking assessments were completed for Resident #262. The facility failed to ensure smoking assessments were accurate for Resident #21 and Resident #25. This failure could place residents at risk of having errors in care and treatment. Findings included: Resident #21 Record review of Resident #21's electronic face sheet dated 12/06/2023 revealed resident was a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted on [DATE] and an original admission date of 09/27/2018 with diagnoses that included: Nicotine Dependence, muscle weakness, Quadriplegia, lack of coordination and cognitive communication deficit. Review of Resident #21's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed: Section C- Cognitive Patterns Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for two (CNA B and CNA C) of 4 staff reviewed for infection control practices. The facility failed to ensure CNA B and CNA C performed hand hygiene when changing gloves at the appropriate times while providing incontinence care for Resident #9. The facility failed to ensure CNA C performed hand hygiene in between filling ice into resident's pitchers on A hall for multiple residents. These failures could affect the residents by placing them at risk for the spread of infection. Finding included: 1.Review of Resident #9's electronic face sheet dated 12/07/2023 revealed he was a [AGE] year-old male originally admitted on [DATE] and most recently admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that include: hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-08 · tag F0941 — pattern
    Develop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program that includes effective communications for direct care staff members.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    During an interview on 12/08/2023 at 10:46 AM, the RCN stated the facility staff had done trainings at townhall meetings. That at this time would be when they would catch up on all of the annual trainings for staff. The RCN stated the ADON told the DON she could not find the binder and had no documentation of trainings. She stated the upper management have trained the staff, and also had a clinical educator with corporate that sent all of the trainings to the ADON then follow up with staff. She stated the ADON resigned the previous day or 12/07/2023 thus unable to find the paperwork needed. The RCN stated with staff not having trainings could lead to residents getting sick from illnesses as well as Abuse and/or treating residents with good care. She stated the ADON and IP monitor the trainings for staff. She stated the failure occurred in not being able to obtain and monitor since the prior survey, as well as not verifying the ADON had the trainings completed. The RCN stated her expectations were for new hires have a checkoff lists and have orientation. During an interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-08 · tag F0942 — pattern
    Ensure that staff members are educated on resident rights and facility responsibilities to properly care for its residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the required education on the rights of the resident and the responsibilities of a facility to properly care for its resident for 7 of 18 employees (SW, DM, MS, LVN-H, CNA-J, CNA-K, and HS) reviewed for training. The facility failed to ensure education on the rights of the resident and the responsibilities of a facility to properly care for its residents was provided to SW, DM, MS, LVN-H, CNA-J, CNA-K, and HS. This failure could affect residents and place them at risk of being uninformed due to lack of staff training. Findings included: Record review of the personnel file for SW revealed a hire date of 04/14/2014 and no evidence of new hire training on resident rights and facility responsibilities. Record review of the personnel file for DM revealed a hire date of 07/15/2019 and no evidence of new hire training on resident rights and facility responsibilities. Record review of the personnel file for MS revealed a hire date of 09/12/2019 and no evidence of new hire training on resident rights and facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-08 · tag F0945 — failed to train staff on abuse prevention — pattern
    Include as part of its infection prevention and control program, mandatory training that includes written standards, policies, and procedures for the program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to implement and maintain an effective Infection Control training program for all new and existing staff for 11 of 18 (DON, SW, DM, MS, RN-F, RN-G, LVN-H, CNA-I, CNA-J, CNA-K, HS) personnel files reviewed for training. The facility failed to train for Infection Control for DON, SW, DM, MS, RN-F, RN-G, LVN-H, CNA-I, CNA-J, CNA-K, and HS. These failures placed residents at risk for unmet needs due to untrained staff. Findings included: Record review of Personnel Files revealed: DON-Hire date of 02/24/2015 - Had no Infection Control training. SW-Hire date of 04/14/2014 - Had no Infection Control training. DM- Hire date of 07/15/2019- Had no Infection Control training. MS- Hire date of 09/12/2019 - Had no Infection Control training. RN-F - Hire date of 9/23/2015 - Had no Infection Control training. RN-G - Hire date of 04/25/2023 - Had no Infection Control training. LVN-H - Hire date of 09/28/2018 Had no Infection Control training. CNA-I-Hire date of 01/25/2013- Had no Infection Control training. CNA-J-Hire date of 11/06/2018- -…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-08 · tag F0946 — pattern
    Provide training in compliance and ethics.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to implement and maintain an effective Compliance and Ethics training program for all new and existing staff for 16 of 18 (ADMN, DON, SW, DM, MS, RN-F, RN-G, LVN-D, LVN-H, CNA-I, CNA-J, CNA-K, HS, CNA-L, CNA-M, and CNA-N) personnel files reviewed for training. The facility failed to train for Compliance and Ethics for ADMN, DON, SW, DM, MS, RN-F, RN-G, LVN-D, LVN-H, CNA-I, CNA-J, CNA-K, HS, CNA-L, CNA-M, and CNA-N These failures placed residents at risk for unmet needs due to untrained staff. Findings included: Record review of Personnel Files revealed: ADMN-Hire date of 11/29/2022- had no Compliance & Ethics training. DON-Hire date of 02/24/2015 - had no Compliance & Ethics training. SW-Hire date of 04/14/2014 - had no Compliance & Ethics training. DM- Hire date of 07/15/2019- had no Compliance & Ethics training. RN-F - Hire date of 9/23/2015 - had no Compliance & Ethics training. RN-G - Hire date of 04/25/2023 - had no Compliance & Ethics training. LVN-H - Hire date of 09/28/2018 had no Compliance & Ethics training.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-08 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — pattern
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 7 of 18 (CNA-I, CNA-J, CNA-K, CNA-L, CNA-M, and CNA-N) employees whose in-service records were reviewed had received the required minimum 12 hours annual in-service, and received training that addressed the care of the cognitively impaired for nurse aides providing services to individuals with cognitive impairment. The facility failed to provide the required annual performance care training to CNA-I, CNA-J, CNA-K, CNA-L, CNA-M, and CNA-N. These failures placed residents at risk for unmet needs due to untrained staff. Findings included: Record review of Personnel Files revealed: CNA-I-Hire date of 01/25/2013- did not receive cognitive impairment training. CNA-J-Hire date of 11/06/2018- did not receive cognitive impairment training. CNA-K-Hire date of 10/11/2022- did not receive cognitive impairment training. CNA-L-Hire date of 06/19/2018 - did not receive cognitive impairment training. CNA-M-Hire date of 05/31/2021- did not receive cognitive impairment training. CNA-N-Hire date of 11/15/2022- did not receive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needed respiratory care, was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and/or the residents' goals and preferences, for 1 of 1 (Resident #10) reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #10's oxygen tubing had been changed and dated once weekly. This failure placed residents that used oxygen at risk of respiratory complications and/or possible respiratory infections. Findings included: Record review of Resident #10's Facesheet dated 12/06/2023 revealed: A [AGE] year-old female, last admitted to the facility on [DATE] and an original admit date of 4/17/2017. A DX list included: Shortness of breath, Dependence on Supplemental Oxygen, weakness, generalized weakness and COPD. Record review of Resident #10's annual MDS dated [DATE] revealed: Section C; BIMS of 09 meaning moderate cognitive impairment. Section…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-08 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that each resident received food that is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature for 1 of 1 lunch meal tested for nutritive value, flavor, and appearance: The facility failed to provide palatable food served at an appetizing temperature to residents, on 3/9/22. The facility failed to ensure the recipe was followed when prepared pureed Oven Fried Chicken. This deficient practice could affect the residents who ate food from the facility kitchen by placing them at risk of poor food intake and/or dissatisfaction of the meals served. The findings included: During an observation and interview on 12/05/2023 at 12:40 PM the DM took the temperature of the food on the test tray. The temperature of the chicken was 112.4 degrees Fahrenheit. The DM stated the chicken should have been warmer. The DM tasted the chicken, broccoli and stated that the chicken was not flavorful. Observation on 12/05/23 at 11:35 AM [NAME] A added cold milk to fried chicken and steamed broccoli while he prepared the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for one (Resident #1) of four residents reviewed, in that: 1. Resident #1's bedroom vertical venetian blinds were missing several slats, and had several slats cut unevenly allowing exposure into resident's bedroom. 2. Resident #1's bedroom inner sliding closet door was off the track. 3. Resident #1's bedroom wall adjacent to the restroom entrance had a 3 ½ by 2-inch hole approximately 12 inches from the floor. These failures could place residents at risk of injury due to closet door potentially falling on resident, risk for pests entering the room through exposed holes in the walls, and lack of dignity of residents' privacy. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 09/27/2023, revealed a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 1's diagnosis included anxiety disorder (mental disorder characterized by feelings of worry, anxiety,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-28 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — pattern
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to allow residents to call for staff assistance through a communication system which relays the call directly to a staff member or to a centralized staff work area for 3 (Resident #15, #16, and #17) out of 8 resident rooms reviewed for environment. -The facility failed to have a working call light that would light up when the residents pushed the call bell for residents' room [ROOM NUMBER] and #44. This failure could place residents at risk of not being able to notify staff when care is needed. The findings included: Resident #15 Review of Resident #15's face sheet, dated 09/28/2023, revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included traumatic brain injury (brain dysfunction caused by an outside force, gastrostomy status (an opening into the stomach from the abdominal wall made surgically for introduction of food), and tracheostomy status (a procedure to help air and oxygen reach the lungs by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-28 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public for three (halls A, B, and D) of four halls reviewed for environment, in that: -Three of four hallways show signs of needing repairs or maintenance with holes in the walls and missing covers. -Several resident bedrooms with holes in the ceiling, walls, and missing covers. These failures could place residents and staff at risk of living in an unsafe, unsanitary, and uncomfortable environment Findings included: Observation on 9/26/2023 at 10:53 a.m., the D-hall thermostat had no cover on the housing to the thermostat. The baseboard near room [ROOM NUMBER] was pulling inwards from the corner and the wall cracked just above the baseboard. room [ROOM NUMBER] had an unused electric outlet without a cover, a 2-inch hole in ceiling tile, and 4 inches by 2 inches hole in another ceiling tile. Observation on 9/26/2023 at 10:55 a.m., the A-hall room…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-28 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain an effective ongoing pest control program for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for pests. The facility failed to have pest control treat the building for rodents and insects. The noncompliance began on 03/03/2023 and ended on 09/19/2023. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. These deficient practices could place residents at risk of exposure to pests, diseases, infections, and diminished quality of life. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 09/27/2023, revealed a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 1's diagnosis included anxiety disorder (mental disorder characterized by feelings of worry, anxiety, or fear that are strong enough to interfere with one's daily activities), dementia (condition characterized by progressive or persistent loss of intellectual functioning, especially with impairment of memory and abstract thinking resulting from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-28 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure when transferring or discharging a resident, documentation was present in the resident's medical record by the resident's physician for 1 (Resident #11) of 3 residents reviewed for discharge requirement. There was no documentation from the physician which indicated the resident had specific needs that could not be met in the facility. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of discharged from the facility without reason. Findings Include: Review of Resident #11's face sheet dated 09/26/2023, revealed a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #11's diagnosis included systemic lupus erythematosus (an inflammatory diseases caused when the immune system attacks its own tissues), dementia (condition characterized by progressive or persistent loss of intellectual functioning, especially with impairment of memory and abstract thinking resulting from organic disease of the brain), anxiety disorder (mental…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-28 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure before transferring or discharging a resident, the notice of transfer or discharge was made by the facility at least 30 days before the resident was transferred or discharged for 1 (Resident #11) of 3 residents reviewed for discharge requirement. There was no documentation from the physician which indicated the resident had specific needs that could not be met in the facility. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of discharged from the facility without reason. Findings Included: Review of Resident #11's face sheet dated 09/26/2023, revealed a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #11's diagnosis included systemic lupus erythematosus (an inflammatory diseases caused when the immune system attacks its own tissues), dementia (condition characterized by progressive or persistent loss of intellectual functioning, especially with impairment of memory and abstract thinking resulting from organic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-10-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the facility's only kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation, in that: 1 Food was moldy. 2. The dishwasher did not get up to a sanitizing temperature 3. The facility was not clean, there were rodent droppings along the walls and under the storage shelves. 4. [NAME] C did not take food temperatures before meal service. 4. Leftovers were not labeled and stored in a manner that prevented contamination. 5. The milk refrigerator was not defrosted and had a build-up of ice on it. This deficient practice could place residents who receive meals prepared from the kitchen and served by facility staff at risk for food borne illness and cross contamination. The findings included: Observation and interviews on 10/18/22 between 8:27 a.m. and 9:20 a.m. revealed: Water was pooled in front of the three-compartment sink. The drain did not have a cover;, the cover was pushed through into the drainpipe. The sanitizer…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-10-20 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and provide care in a manner that promoted maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 1 of 3 meals (lunch meal observed) for resident rights. Residents sitting at the same table were not served at the same time. This failure could place residents at risk of not being treated in a dignified, respectable manner. CNA B Failed to acknowledge Resident #33 when he asked for his food tray. Findings include: Observation on 10/18/22 between 11:45 AM and 12:45 p.m. revealed: 11:45 am There were 7 residents in the Dining Room. 11:45am Drink carts were rolled out. 11:58 am The first cart of trays were rolled out of the kitchen, only 4 residents were served their trays, and the remaining trays were rolled out to the halls. Resident #50 asked for his tray by waving his arms, but CNA B told him that his tray was not on the cart. 12:06 pm The second cart of trays were rolled out of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-20 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to respect the resident's right to personal privacy during care, for 2 of 3 residents (Residents #26) reviewed for privacy, in that: CNA's A and B failed to provide privacy when providing incontinent care to Resident #26 due to no privacy curtain available. During the care Resident #6 was able to observe Resident #26 being changed due to no privacy provided. This failure could place incontinent residents at risk for embarrassment, poor self-esteem, and unmet needs. The findings were: Record review of Resident #6's admission record dated 10/19/22 indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included lack of coordination and muscle weakness. She was [AGE] years of age. Record review of Resident #6's MDS dated [DATE] indicated in part: Brief Interview for Mental Status = 15 indicating the resident was cognitively intact. Record review of Resident #26's admission record dated 10/18/22 indicated she was admitted to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-10-20 · tag F0800 — pattern
    Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the menu was followed for 1 of 1 lunch meals reviewed for menus and nutritional adequacy on 10/20/2022 in that: The facility failed to follow the menu and/or recipe for the noon meal on 10/20/22. The facility failed to follow the recommended serving sizes for the noon meal on 10/20/22. These failures could place residents who eat regular foods and residents who eat pureed foods at risk of not having their nutritional needs met. Findings included: Interview on 10/19/22 at 1:33 p.m., 5 alert lucid residents with the Resident Council meeting stated sometimes the food tasted horrible and the kitchen did not respect resident's dietary needs. The Resident Council said if one thing could be fixed, they unanimously stated the food. Observation and interview on 10/20/22 at 11:28 a.m. the DM was making the desert of pudding. She stated she was using a ¼ cup for the desert. Observation on 10/20/22 at 11:50 a.m. [NAME] C got a new thermometer…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-10-20 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that menus were followed, and the meals served met the nutritional needs of residents, as evidenced by: Cook C failed to follow the recipe for the noon meal for all residents receiving oral food by not serving pinto beans and ham. Cook C used milk to thin the puree ham. Cook C failed to make puree cornbread for residents. These failures placed residents at risk for a decline in health status due to inadequate or inappropriate nutritional intake. Findings include: Observation of a meal ticket dated 10/20/22 at 10:32 AM showed the lunch was supposed to be pinto beans and ham, fried okra, corn bread, and a sugar cookie. Observation and interview on 10/20/22 at 11:32 a.m. revealed [NAME] C making the puree ham. She used milk to thin down the ham. She showed surveyor the texture which looked like mechanical soft ham with milk poured on top. Surveyor noted the meat had not incorporated well. [NAME] C stated, it never does and began to run…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-20 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that each resident received food that is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature for 5 of 5 resident in the Resident Council Meeting for 1 of 1 Lunch meals tested for nutritive value, flavor, and appearance: The lunch test tray received on 10/20/22 was lukewarm. The puree protein (ham) was made with milk and was unattractive. This deficient practice could affect the residents who ate food from the facility kitchen by placing them at risk of poor food intake and/or dissatisfaction of the meals served. The findings were: Interview on 10/18/22 at 9:17 a.m. the DM stated she had worked at the facility for approximately 3 weeks During the confidential Resident Council Meeting on 10/19/22 at 1:33 p.m., 5 of 5 residents said the food was horrible and cold. The residents shared the meat was too hard to chew, and the toast was frequently burnt. The residents stated the toaster had broken . One resident said he was excited because he got pepper on his tray the other day, and he did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-10-20 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received food that accommodate the preferences for five of five confidential resident group members for accommodation of residents' preferences. - Five confidential group members were not offered a meal substitution of equal nutritional value when they did not like what was being served. -The facility failed to have a meal substitution of equal nutritional value available or listed on the menu for residents. These failures place all residents who consumed food from the facility's kitchen at risk for dissatisfaction, poor intake, weight loss, and declined in health. Findings included: During the confidential Resident Council Meeting on 10/19/22 beginning at 1:33 PM, 5 alert residents said meal substitutes were not offered. Interview on 10/20/22 at 10:00 AM the DM stated the facility did not offer substitutes. She added we've barely started following the calendar (menu). Interview on 10/20/22 at 10:32 AM, [NAME] C said she kept asking the facility for more food, but they kept saying budget and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-10-20 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain all mechanical, electrical, and patient care equipment, in safe operating condition, for 1 of kitchen reviewed for essential equipment. The facility did not maintain the dishwasher at a working temperature. The facility did not ensure the gas oven was in working order. The knob's paint had worn off so staff could not ensure proper temperature was set. The facility did not have a working toaster. This failure could place residents at risk of being exposed to equipment that does not function properly. Findings Include: Observations and interview of the facility's only kitchen on 10/18/22 between 8:27 a.m. and 9:20 a.m. revealed: There was water pooled in front of the facility's three-compartment sink. The dairy refrigerator had a large buildup of ice on the top of it . The dishwasher reached 100 degrees F. The DM was present and said that the previous facility she worked at the dish machine had to be at 120 F. She did not know why this facility would be different. She stated it meant the dishes were not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-20 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment in resident rooms and hallways throughout the facility. Resident rooms and other areas accessible to the residents had drywall damage, missing floor tile, missing receptacle covers, missing window blind slats and broken mini blinds. The drain in front of the three-compartment sink did not have a cover on it leaving it completely open. These failures affected the residents and placed them at risk of living in an unsafe and uncomfortable environment. Findings included: During an operation on 10/18/22 at 8:27 a.m. of the facility's only kitchen showed the drain in front of the three compartment sink open to the piping underneath. During an interview on 10/20/22 at 10:25 a.m. [NAME] C stated she had tripped in the open drain while doing food preparation. During an observation on 10/20/22 at 02:12 p.m. of resident room [ROOM NUMBER], there were broken ceiling tiles. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 3 resident reviewed for accident hazards/supervision (Resident #42). The facility failed to ensure CNA D demonstrated appropriate transfer techniques for Resident #5. These failures could place residents at risk for injuries from inappropriate transfers. Findings included: Review of Resident #47's admission Record dated 10/18/22 revealed she was a ninety-seven-year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included unsteadiness on feet, abnormalities of gait and mobility, age related debility, lack of coordination, muscle weakness, and difficulty walking. Review of Resident #47's Quarterly MDS Assessment revealed: she needed extensive assistance of two staff for transfers and she generally used a wheelchair. Review of Resident #47's Care Plan, revised on 3/17/21 revealed: Focus: Resident #47 had an ADL self-care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 (Resident #26) of 2 residents reviewed for infection control incontinent care. The facility failed to ensure CNA A changed her gloves after they became contaminated during incontinent care while assisting Resident #26. This failure could place resident's risk for cross contamination and the spread of infection. Finding include: Record review of Resident #26's admission record dated 10/18/22 indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included age related cognitive decline and muscle weakness. She was [AGE] years of age. Record review of Resident #26's MDS dated [DATE] indicated in part: Bladder and Bowel: Urinary Continence =. 3. Always incontinent (no episodes of continent voiding). Bowel…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$9,110 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $9,110 — penalty dated 2026-02-27

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to FOCUSED POST ACUTE CARE PARTNERS — 25 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 51.9-0.9 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.1-0.1 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.2-0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 54.0-1.0 vs chain
The other 24 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.9★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
BOWERMAN, STEPHENIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2023
CHAPLIN, CARIIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 11/01/2016
FLORES, THOMASIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 05/01/2023
GOLDAPP, SHANNONIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 11/01/2024
GREENE, TRACIEIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 09/01/2016
GRIMES, DAVIDIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 12/01/2018
MCKENZIE, MARKIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2017
FOCUSED POSTOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/17/2025
FOCUSED POST ACUTE CARE PARTNERS II LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/17/2025
FOCUSED POST ACUTE CARE PARTNERS LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/17/2025
FOCUSED POST ACUTE CARE PARTNERS MANAGEMENT, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/17/2025
FPACP HOGAN PARK LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/17/2025
MIDLAND COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICTOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/01/2017
ARNOLD, TANYAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/10/2024
CONLEY, SHAWNIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2017
GRAMETBAUR, CAROLYNIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2022
MWANJE, BANYWAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/29/2022
STRUBBE, LORETTAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2017
ORTEGA, SCOTTYIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 32 rows in the source record cover these 19 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$4.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-24.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$202K
Related-party expense4% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 86%Medicare 4%Other / private 10%

About 86% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $202K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$267per resident / day
operating cost
$8,117per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$215per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Texas
$5,627/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,666/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 675910. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-01-16, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next