No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Focused Care at Mount Pleasant

1606 Memorial Ave, Mount Pleasant, TX 75455 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 122 certified beds · (903) 572-3618 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuse3 immediate-jeopardy citations$223,296 in federal fines2 Medicare payment denials
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Jan 2026
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (82) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $223,296 in federal fines (most recent 2025-06-25)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
301 W 18th St · (903) 572-9050 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
2001 N Jefferson Ave · (903) 572-6418 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
307 W 15th St · (903) 563-7375 · Call to confirm hours
Park
815 W 16th St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased27.4%15.8%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.8%3.0%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.3%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.4%0.8%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.4%2.4%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.3%3.3%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened9.8%14.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication18.5%18.0%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine94.2%98.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.2%3.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control9.7%13.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table8.9%9.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication4.8%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine29.4%88.0%79.4%worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

12.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
50.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.24U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.09hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 50.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 22 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 31% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.4%CMS range 8.1–17.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge50.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge18.2%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge18.2%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.101.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.38
RN hours/ resident / day
0.65
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.13
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.16
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.37
RN hoursweekends
48.4%
Total nursing turnover
61.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 122 beds and averages 71.5 residents a day — about 59% occupied, or roughly 50 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.16 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.38 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.13 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.92 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.26 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.38 to 0.37 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

8
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-07-02)
23
at the previous standard inspection (2024-05-24)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

82 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 68 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-05-24 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide residents with personal privacy and confidentiality of his or her personal and medical records for 1 of 20 (Resident #40) residents reviewed for resident rights. 1. LVN A video recorded Resident #40 on [DATE] when he was in an emergent situation using her personal device and then shared the video with RN B on [DATE]. 2. RN B shared the [DATE] video recording with the ADON, and the BOM on [DATE]. 3. Resident #23 overheard LVN A having a telephone discussion on her personal cell phone of the video recording on [DATE] of Resident #40 while in a common area on her personal cell phone. 4. LVN A and RN B were in possession of the video recording on their personal devices from [DATE] - [DATE]. 5. RN B continued to have a screen shot of the video recording of Resident #40 on her personal cellular device on [DATE]. 6. The facility failed to notify Resident #40 of the video obtained of him during his emergent situation, and the distribution…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-05-24 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure procedures were in place to document a resident's choice regarding CPR for 1 of 20 residents (Resident #114) reviewed for CPR. 1. The facility performed CPR on Resident #114 on [DATE], after failing to accurately assess Resident #114's representative's choice for DNR code status on or before admission. 2. The facility failed to have a system in place to ensure staff maintained accurate CPR certifications. The SW failed to accurately document Resident #1's code status on the social service assessment. These failures resulted in an identification of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on [DATE] . The IJ template was provide to the facility on [DATE] at 4:43 p.m. While the IJ was removed on [DATE] at 12:13 p.m., the facility remained out of compliance at no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy with a scope of isolated due to the facility's need to complete in-service training and evaluate the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2023-10-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 5 of 5 residents (Residents #1, #2, #3, #4 and #5) and 6 out of 11 nondedicated and contracted staff (MA A, CNA B, CNA F, CNA CC, Hospice Aide and X-ray Technician) in the facility reviewed for infection control practices and transmission-based precautions. 1. The facility failed to report the COVID-19 outbreak to both the local health department and HHSC. 2. The facility failed to ensure facility staff had readily available access to appropriate PPE supplies when caring for Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, and Resident #5. 3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3, and Resident #4 were separated after Resident #3 tested positive for COVID and Resident #4 did not. 4. The facility failed to ensure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2024-02-14 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary medications (a medication used in excessive doses and including duplicate therapy or for excessive duration; or without adequate monitoring, or without adequate indications for its use; or in the presence of adverse consequences which indicated the dose should be reduced or discontinued) for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident #5) The facility failed to ensure Resident #5 had behavior monitoring for with the use of anti-psychotic medications. These failures could place residents at risk for receiving unnecessary psychotropic medications with possible medication side effects, adverse consequences, decreased quality of life, and dependence on unnecessary medications. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 2/21/2024 indicated Resident #5 was a [AGE] year-old female who admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of Alzheimer's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for infection control.The facility failed to ensure the ADON applied enhanced barrier precautions when she performed a skin assessment and provided incontinent care to Resident #1 on 5/18/2026 at 3:00 PM.The facility failed to ensure the CNA applied enhanced barrier precautions while assisting the ADON with positioning and holding Resident #1 on 5/18/2026 at 3:00 PM.These failures could place residents at risk of cross-contamination and infections leading to illness. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's Face sheet, dated 5/20/2026, indicated a 38-year- old female admitted [DATE], diagnoses included chronic respiratory failure (a long-term condition where the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-20 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, sanitary, comfortable, and homelike environment for 3 of 7 resident rooms and 1 of 2 hallways reviewed for environment. (Room # 2, Room # 4, Room # 5, room [ROOM NUMBER], Hallway #1)The facility failed to ensure Room # 2's air conditioning unit was free from gaps to outside on 5/18/2026 at 10:14 AM.The facility failed to ensure Room # 4 had base boards below the air conditioning unit on 5/18/2026 at 10:17 AM.The facility failed to ensure room [ROOM NUMBER]'s floor was not stained under air conditioning unit on 5/19/2026 at 11:50 AM.The facility failed to ensure room [ROOM NUMBER]'s white casing board was secured to wall and patch work along the border below the air conditioning unit was even and in good repair on 5/19/2026 at 11:00 AM.The facility failed to ensure Hallway #1's window seal on the secure men's unit was not broken, exposing wood fragments on 5/18/2026 at 10:14 AM.These failures could place residents at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-13 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the right to be free from misappropriation of resident property for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for misappropriation of resident property. (Resident #1) The facility to failed keep Resident #1 free of misappropriation of property when RN A took a discontinued medication, 60 tablets of Meloxicam 7.5 milligrams, from the facility. This failure could place residents at risk for decreased quality of life, misappropriation of property, and dignity.Findings Included: Record review of face sheet dated 01/13/26 indicated Resident #1 was [AGE] years old and was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of senile degeneration of the brain (significant age-related cognitive decline), difficulty in walking, and a cognitive communication deficit.Record review of an Order Summary Report dated 01/13/26 for Resident #1 indicated an order for Meloxicam (a prescription nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) used primarily to relieve pain,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights for 3 of 16 (Resident #4, Resident #5, and Resident #6) residents reviewed for care plans, The facility failed to ensure Resident #4's pressure ulcer to her buttock was care planned from her re-admission on [DATE] until 11/11/25. The facility failed to ensure Resident #5's wander guard status was properly care planned with the care plan indicating Resident #5 had a wander guard in place and observations and interviews indicating Resident #5 did not have a wander guard. The facility failed to ensure Resident #6's secured unit status was properly care planned with the care plan indicating Resident #6 resided on the secured unit and a social services note dated 5/6/25 indicating she had been moved off the secured unit. This failure could place the residents at increased risk of not having their individual needs met and a decreased…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 of 6 (Resident #1) residents reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 had a skin assessment performed weekly on the weeks of 10/6/25, 10/13/25, 10/20/25, and 10/27/25 per facility policy. These failures could result in skin issues on residents being missed, skin issues deteriorating without being monitored, and decreased quality of life. Findings Included: 1. Record review of the face sheet dated 11/12/25 indicated Resident #1 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral infarction (a type of stroke caused by the blood vessels supplying the brain being blocked), Atrial Fibrillation (an irregular heartbeat where the upper chambers of the heart beat chaotically and very fast), COPD, and hypertension (elevated blood pressure). Record review of the MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 1 of 16 (Resident #2) residents review for dignity and respect. The facility failed ensure Resident #2 was treated with dignity and respect by LVN A on 11/12/25 when LVN A told Resident #2 to sit his ass down. These failures could place residents at risk of a diminished quality of life, loss of dignity and self-worth.Findings included: 1. Record review of the face sheet dated 11/13/25 indicated Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's, disorganized schizophrenia (a subtype of schizophrenia characterized by disorganized thinking, speech, and behavior), and anxiety disorder. Record review of the MDS dated [DATE] indicated Resident #2 sometimes understood others and was sometimes understood by others. The MDS indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-26 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to complete an accurate MDS assessment to reflect residents' status for 1 of 16 residents reviewed for assessments. (Resident #4) The facility failed to ensure Resident #4's MDS dated [DATE] documented the presence of a pressure ulcer that she re-admitted to the facility with on 10/16/25. This failure could place residents at risk for inaccurate assessments and not receiving needed services.Findings included:1. Record review of the face sheet dated 11/12/25 indicated Resident #4 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes, schizoaffective disorder (a chronic mental health condition that combines symptoms of schizophrenia with symptoms of mood disorder like bipolar disorder or depression), hypertension (elevated blood pressure), and lack of coordination. Record review of the MDS dated [DATE] indicated Resident #4 usually understood others and was usually understood by others. The MDS indicated Resident #4 was unable to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-26 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for treatment and services related to indwelling catheters. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's Foley catheter drainage bag was kept off the floor on 10/21/25. These failures could place residents at risk for urinary tract infections, injuries, and a decreased quality of life.The findings included: Record review the face sheet, dated 10/22/25, reflected Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of senile degeneration of the brain (progressive deterioration of brain tissue and function that occurs with aging), neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder (nerve damage that affects bladder control), benign prostatic hyperplasia (enlargement of the prostate gland), and retention of urine (inability to completely empty…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure in accordance with accepted standards of practices, the medical records on each resident were accurately documented for 2 of 16 residents (Resident #4 and Resident #7) reviewed for accurate medical records. The facility failed to ensure Resident #4's wound assessment completed on 11/7/25 by the Treatment Nurse accurately reflected her pressure ulcer was worsening as the Wound Care NP had documented on 11/7/25. The facility failed to ensure Resident #7's wound assessment completed on 11/7/25 by the Treatment Nurse accurately reflected her pressure ulcer was worsening as the Wound Care NP had documented on 11/7/25. These failures could place residents receiving wound care at risk for confusion on whether a wound is improving or worsening. Findings included:1. Record review of the face sheet dated 11/12/25 indicated Resident #4 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes, schizoaffective disorder (a chronic mental…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-08 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to have an ongoing and effective pest control program for 3 of 7 resident rooms reviewed for pest control (Resident #1, Resident #2 and Resident #3.) The facility did not have an effective pest control program to eradicate the cockroaches in the facility. The facility failure placed residents at risk for diarrhea, dysentery (infectious diarrhea), salmonella (an infection that can lead to diarrhea, fever, and stomach cramps), and other serious health concerns. Findings included: 1.Record review of the face sheet for Resident #1 indicated he was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic heart failure, COPD (Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is a group of lung diseases that cause ongoing breathing problems), history of cellulitis to lower extremities (common bacterial skin infection that affects the deeper layers of the skin and underlying tissue). Record review of Resident #1's MDS dated [DATE] indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 68 citations
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for food service safety.1. The facility failed to ensure all food items were labeled and dated in Refrigerator #1.2. The facility ensure that wall in the pantry was in good repair. 3. The facility failed to ensure that the pantry was free of rotting food.4. The facility failed to ensure that a scoop for the sugar bin was properly stored. 5. The facility failed to ensure the ceiling under the air conditioner duct was in good repair.6. The facility failed to ensure that all air conditioner vents were clean and free of condensation. These failures could place residents at risk of foodborne illness and food contamination.Findings include: During an observation on 06/30/25 at 8:41 a.m., revealed one plastic bag containing one light brown round food item with no date or label in Refrigerator #1. During an observation 06/30/25 at 8:44 a.m., revealed a wall in the pantry with an air conditioner in the wall.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-07-02 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to maintain all mechanical and electrical equipment in safe operating condition for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for safe operating condition.The facility failed to ensure Freezer #2 maintained a safe storage temperature and not allow food items to thaw.This failure poses a risk of essential kitchen equipment malfunctions causing foods to be held at an unsafe temperature and cause food borne illness. Findings included: Record review of a Kitchen Freezer Log for June 2025 revealed on 06/27/25 the morning temperature for Freezer #1 was 5 degrees. The temperature was initialed by [NAME] G. The evening temperature for 06/27/25 was 2 degrees Fahrenheit. On 06/28/25, the morning temperature was 0 degrees Fahrenheit, and the evening temperature was 3 degrees Fahrenheit. The morning temperature was initialed by the Dietary Manager. On 06/29/25, the morning temperature was 2 degrees Fahrenheit, and the evening temperature was 0 degrees Fahrenheit. The morning temperature was initialed by the Dietary Manager. On 06/30/25, the morning…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-02 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident received and the facility provided food and drink that was palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature for 5 of 17 residents (Resident #3, Resident #24, Resident #39, Resident #48, and Resident #119) and 4 anonymous residents reviewed for palatable food. 1. The facility failed to ensure residents received food that tasted good. 2. The facility failed to ensure residents did not receive cold food. 3. The facility failed to ensure residents received preferred portion sizes. These failures could place residents at risk of weight loss, altered nutritional status and diminished quality of life. Findings included: 1. Record review of a face sheet dated 07/01/25 revealed Resident #3 was a [AGE] year-old female and was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including congestive heart failure, muscle weakness, and anxiety. Record review of a quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-02 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, and comfortable homelike environment for 2 of 20 resident's (Resident #7 and Resident #37) reviewed for a homelike environment.1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #7's wall was free from peeling paint at the head of her bed with approximately 4 different areas measuring approximately 1-2 inches wide and 2-3 inches long.2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #7's wall was free from peeling paint by her pillow that measured approximately 6-8 inches at the widest point and a foot long at the longest point.3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #7's air condition/heat unit was free from peeling paint and/or caulk around the unit leaving approximately half inch gaps around the top of the unit.4. The facility failed to ensure Resident #37's wall was free from peeling paint at the midway area of his bed that measured approximately 10 inches at the widest point and a foot long at the longest point.These failures…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-02 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that respiratory care was provided consistent with professional standards of practice for 2 of 9 residents reviewed for respiratory care. (Resident #7 and Resident #26)1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #7's oxygen concentrator (takes air from the surroundings, extracts oxygen and filters it into purified oxygen for resident to breathe) air intake area (mouth of the oxygen concentrator bringing in the air that will be processed) was not covered in gray fuzzy dust-like and hair-like particles.2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #7 had an order and care plan for oxygen therapy.3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #26's oxygen concentrator air intake area was not covered in gray fuzzy dust-like and hair-like particles.These failures could place residents at risk of respiratory complications or respiratory infection. Findings included:1. Record review of Resident #7's face sheet dated 6/30/25 indicated she was [AGE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-02 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure nurse aides were able to demonstrate competency in skills and necessary techniques to care for resident's needs, as identified through resident assessments and described in the plan of care for 1 of 2 RCPs (RCP E) reviewed for nurse aide competencies. The facility failed to ensure RCP E was competent in performing a safe mechanical lift (machine used to lift and transfer a resident from one surface to another, such as from chair to bed/bed to chair) transfer on Resident #2 when RCP E did not place the legs of the mechanical lift in the wide position when lowering or transferring the resident and did not lock the lift wheels while lifting or lowering the resident.This failure could place residents at an increased and unnecessary risk of injury.Findings included:Record review of Resident #2's face sheet dated 7/02/25 indicated she was [AGE] years old and admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted [DATE]. Resident #2 had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment, and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for enhanced barrier precautions (Resident #121) infection control practices.The facility failed to ensure RN C donned (put on) a gown prior administering medications and feeding to Resident #121 via g-tube. Resident #121 was on enhanced barrier precautions.These failures could place residents at risk of exposure to communicable diseases, cross-contamination, and infections.Findings included: Record review of Resident #121's face sheet dated 07/07/25, indicated she was a [AGE] year-old female that admitted [DATE] with diagnoses that included: epilepsy (a disorder in which nerve cell activity in the brain disturbed, causing seizures), gastrostomy status (opening allows for a tube to be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-02 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — isolated
    Have policies on smoking.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their own established smoking policy for 1 of 9 residents reviewed for smoking. (Resident #37)The facility failed to ensure Resident #37 followed the smoking policy and did not have smoking supplies (cigarettes and lighter) at his bedside. This failure could place residents at risk for injury or harm. Findings included:Record review of Resident #37's face sheet dated 6/30/25 indicated he was [AGE] years old and admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #37 had diagnoses which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe), senile degeneration of the brain (decline in cognitive function associated with aging), lack of coordination, and nicotine dependence.Record review of Resident #37's annual MDS assessment dated [DATE], indicated he had a BIMS score of 9, which indicated he had moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated Resident #37 had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-17 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation , interview and record review the facility failed to establish a system of records of receipt and disposition of all controlled drugs in sufficient detail to enable an accurate reconciliation and determine that drug records are in order and that an account of all controlled drugs were maintained and periodically reconciled for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #12) reviewed for drug diversion. The facility failed to prevent the drug diversion of 55 tablets of Hydrocodone (Norco) (a combination medicine that is commonly taken for severe pain) for Resident #12 on 2/6/2025. This failure could place residents at risk for drug diversion of physician ordered medications which could result in residents not having medications/treatments available and a decline in health. Findings include: Record review of Resident #12's face sheet, dated 4/17/2025, indicated a [AGE] year-old male who was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #12 had diagnoses which included Alzheimer's disease (a progressive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-13 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for 5 of 66 residents (Resident #1, #2, #3, #4, and #5) reviewed for resident abuse. The facility did not ensure Resident (Resident #1, #2, #3, #4, and #5) were free from abuse. This failure could place residents at risk of physical harm, mental anguish, or emotional distress. The findings included: 1. Record Review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 2/11/25 at 2:15 p.m., indicated Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of senile degeneration of brain (progressive deterioration of brain tissue and function that occurs beyond what's considered normal aging), Muscle weakness (a lack of muscle strength, meaning the muscles may not contract or move as easily as they used to), Delusional disorders (a psychotic disorder that can make it hard for a person to distinguish between what's real and what's imagined to be true), essential hypertension (high blood pressure).…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident had the right to be free from abuse for 1 of 8 (Resident #1) residents reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to protect Resident #1 from verbal and physical abuse from LVN A on 9/26/24 resulting in Resident #1 being pushed by LVN A and falling to the floor. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The noncompliance began on 9/26/24 and ended on 9/27/24. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. This failure could place residents at risk for physical and verbal abuse, psychosocial harm, and decreased quality of life. Findings Include: 1. Record review of the face sheet dated 12/19/24 indicated Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old male, re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's, PTSD, difficulty walking, violent behavior, lack of coordination, and cognitive communication deficit (communication difficulty caused by cognitive impairment). Record review of the MDS dated [DATE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-24 · tag F0552 — pattern
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Record review of the face sheet, dated 05/24/2024, revealed Resident #30 was an [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of anxiety disorder (mental illnesses that cause constant fear and worry) and neuropathy (numbness or tingling in hands or feet from damaged nerves). Record review of the comprehensive MDS assessment, dated 03/11/2024, revealed Resident #30 had clear speech and was understood by staff. The MDS revealed Resident #30 was able to understand others. The MDS revealed Resident #30 had a BIMS score of 7, which indicated severely impaired cognition. The MDS revealed Resident #30 was taking an antipsychotic and antianxiety medication during the last 7 days of the look-back period. Record review of the comprehensive care plan, initiated on 03/15/2024, revealed Resident #30 was taking an antipsychotic medication related to history of aggression, delusion, and agitation. Record review of the physician orders for Resident #30 revealed the following: o Risperidone…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-24 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident's person-centered comprehensive care plan was reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment for 4 of 20 residents (Residents #'s 13, 39, 44, and 59), reviewed for care plans. 1)The facility failed to revise and update Resident #13's comprehensive care to reflect his election of hospice services on 5/17/2024. 2)The facility failed to revise and update Resident #39's comprehensive care plan to reflect he was no longer residing on the secured unit as of 5/17/2024. 3)The facility failed to revise and update Resident #44's comprehensive care plan to reflect he was using oxygen continuously. 4)The facility failed to revise and update Resident #59's comprehensive care plan to reflect he was no longer receiving antibiotic and had an PICC (Peripheral Inserted Central Catheter) line since March 2024. These deficient practices could affect residents by placing them at risk of not receiving appropriate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-24 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that it was free of medication error rate of 5 percent or greater. The facility had a medication error rate of 73.08 %, based on 19 errors out of 26 opportunities, which involved 3 of 3 residents (Residents #14, #24 and #56) reviewed for medication administration. The facility failed to ensure Residents #14 and #24 medications were administered during the scheduled time. The facility did not ensure Resident #56 was given Famotidine 20 mg. The facility did not ensure Resident #56 Diclofenac Sodium 1% was applied to one extremity instead of both extremities. These failures could place residents at risk for not receiving the intended therapeutic benefit of their medications or receiving them as prescribed, per physician orders. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #14's face sheet, dated 05/22/2024, indicated Resident #14 was a [AGE] year-old-male, originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis which included…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-24 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — pattern
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service for 1 out of 1 kitchen reviewed for sufficient support personnel. The facility did not ensure the lunch meal on 05/20/2024, 05/21/2024, and 05/22/2024 were served on time. This failure could place residents at risks who consume food prepared in the kitchen at risk of foodborne illness. Findings included: Record review of the Meal Time Serving Order, sheet undated, indicated breakfast was started at 7:00 a.m. and lunch was started at 12:00 p.m. for the secured men's unit, dining room, women's unit and north hall. During an interview on 05/20/2024 beginning at 9:00 a.m., the Dietary Manager stated breakfast was served at 7:00 a.m. and lunch was served at 12:00 p.m. During an observation on 05/20/2024 at 12:30 p.m., first trays were wheeled to the secured men's unit. The first dining room trays were served at 12:50 p.m. The last trays on north hall were served at 1:45 p.m. During an observation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety in the facility's only kitchen. The facility failed to ensure: 1. Food items were dated. 2. The juice machine spigot was free from a red gooey substance where the juice was dispersed. 3. Muffin pans were free from encrusted black colored grease buildup coating the entire outside and most of the inside surface. 4. The steam pans were stacked with water pooled in between them. 5. The microwave was clean and free of food debris. 6. The stove was clean and free of food debris. 7. Test strips (test strips used to measure the concentration of chemicals in sanitizing solution) were not expired. 8. Hair restraints worn. These failures could place residents at risk for foodborne illness. Findings included: During the initial tour observation with the Dietary Manager on 05/20/2024 between 9:00 a.m. and 9:45 a.m., the following was revealed: 1. 3 Muffin pans were free from encrusted black colored grease buildup coating…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Record review of a face sheet dated 5/22/2024 indicated Resident #44 was a [AGE] year-old male who admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of Alzheimer's Disease (dementia, memory loss disease), and obstructive and reflux uropathy (blocked or backward flow of uine). Record review of a Significant Change MDS dated [DATE] indicated Resident #44 was usually understood, and usually understood others. The MDS indicated Resident #44's BIMS was a 7 indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS in section GG-Functional Abilities and Goals indicated Resident #44 was dependent of the staff to complete all of the effort of toileting. The MDS in section H-Bladder and Bowel H0100Resident #44 was indicated to have an indwelling catheter and in H0300 to have not rated due to the use of a Foley catheter. Record review of the Comprehensive Care Plan dated 3/06/2023 indicated Resident #44 an indwelling catheter 18 French with a 10 cubic centimeter bulb and was at risk for increased urinary tract…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-24 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to establish a infection prevention and control program that includes antibiotic use protocol and a system to monitor antibiotic use for 1 of 4 residents and reviewed for antibiotic stewardship program. (Resident #11) The facility did not ensure Resident #11 was assessed using the established and accepted criteria to determine if her UTI met the criteria for antibiotic use. These failures could place residents receiving antibiotics at risk for unnecessary antibiotic use, inappropriate antibiotic use, and increased antibiotic-resistant infections. The findings included: Record review of the face sheet, dated 05/24/2024, revealed Resident #11 was a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of schizophrenia (serious mental disorder that affects how people interpret reality), multiple sclerosis (disease that affects the brain and spinal cord and causes nerve damage and communication problems), and parkinsonism (umbrella term…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-24 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program so that facility is free of pests and rodents for 1 of 3 units (the facility's main building to include the dining room, hallway, and room [ROOM NUMBER], 49, and 52). The facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to ensure the facility was free of flies in the main building dining room, hallway, and Resident Room's 48, 49, and 52. These findings could place residents at risk for an unsanitary environment and a decreased quality of life. The findings included: Record review of the pest control log dated 10/10/2022, 03/02/2023, 06/07/2023, 09/06/2023, 10/05/2023, 11/01/2023, 12/09/2023, 01/03/2024, 01/30/2024, 02/07/2024, and 03/05/2024 revealed the pest control company had serviced the facility on the above dates . The log did not specify the areas that were serviced. Record review of the service notification from the pest control company , dated 05/01/2024, revealed Upon…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-24 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and provide care in a manner that promoted maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 1 of 3 dining room (women's secure unit dining room) reviewed for resident rights. The facility did not ensure LVN O treated residents with dignity and respect by referring to them as feeders in the women's secure unit during lunch meal service. This failure could place residents at an increased risk of embarrassment, isolation, and diminished quality of life. Findings included: During a dining observation on 05/22/24 at 1:15 p.m., LVN O was passing out dining trays to resident sitting at the dining table and loudly stated to the CNA the trays left on the dining cart were for the feeders in the women's secure unit. During an interview on 05/22/24 at 1:25 p.m., LVN O stated she was not going to lie, she did refer to the trays as belonging to the feeders. LVN O stated it was important not to use the word feeder because it was a dignity issue. LVN O stated using…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-24 · tag F0573 — isolated
    Let each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to allow residents to obtain a copy of the records or any portions thereof upon request and 2 working days advance notice to the family for 1 of 1 (Resident #44) resident reviewed for the right to access copies of records. The facility failed to provide medical records for Resident #44 to his attorney within two working days of a request on 11/27/2023 for them. This failure could place residents at risk by causing a negative health impact due to not having continuity of care. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 5/22/2024 indicated Resident #44 was a [AGE] year-old male who admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of Alzheimer's Disease (dementia, memory loss disease), diabetes, and stroke. Record review of a Significant Change MDS dated [DATE] indicated Resident #44 was usually understood, and usually understood others. The MDS indicated Resident #44's BIMS was a 7 indicating severe cognitive impairment. Record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-24 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' rights to formulate an advance directive for 1 of 20 residents reviewed for advanced directives. (Resident #52) The facility failed to ensure Resident #52's code status was accurate and consistent with all records at the facility. This failure placed the residents at risk of not having their end of life wishes honored. Findings included: Record review of the face sheet dated 05/22/2024, revealed Resident #52 was a [AGE] year-old male with a diagnose other frontotemporal neurocognitive disorder (an umbrella term for a group of brain disease that mainly affect the frontal and temporal lobes of the brain), cognitive communication deficit (difficulty with any aspect of communication that was affected by disruption of cognition), unspecified psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition (mental, behavioral and neurodevelopmental disorders). Record review of the MDS dated [DATE], revealed Resident #52 had a BIMS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-24 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 1 of 2 locked units (men's secure unit dining room) observed for homelike environment. The facility failed to ensure residents did not receive meals on serving trays in the dining room during the lunch mealtimes. This failure could result in residents having poor self-esteem and decreased quality of life. The findings included: During a dining observation on 05/20/24 at 12:50 p.m., LVN U was observed leaving the plates on the lunch trays in the men's secure unit. During a dining observation on 05/21/24 at 12:38 p.m., LVN U was observed leaving the plates on the lunch trays in the men's secure unit. During an interview on 05/22/24 at 2:00 p.m., LVN U stated she did not know why they left the plates on the trays. LVN U stated she felt like leaving the plates on the trays was easier to contain the mess. LVN U stated it was important to make the residents feel like they're at home. LVN U stated she did not know what the failure to the residents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-24 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received appropriate treatment and services to prevent further decrease of ROM for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for range of motion. (Resident #215) The facility did not ensure Resident #215 had a contracture prevention device in place for the treatment of his left hand, wrist, and elbow contracture. This failure could place residents at risk for decrease in mobility and range of motion and contribute to worsening of contractures. The findings included: Record review of Resident #215's face sheet, dated 05/24/2024, revealed Resident #215 was a [AGE] year-old male who initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of end stage renal disease (occurs when chronic kidney disease - the gradual loss of kidney function - reaches an advanced state) and hemiplegia and hemiparesis affecting left non-dominant side (conditions that cause weakness or paralysis on one side of the body). Record review of the Annual MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-24 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #13 and Resident #44) reviewed for indwelling urinary catheters and incontinent care. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #'s 13 and 44's urinary (foley) catheter was properly secured to his leg. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #44 was provided proper incontinent care and catheter care. This failure could place residents with urinary catheters at risk for damage to the bladder, penis, or urethra (a hollow tube that lets urine leave your body), dislodging of the catheter, and urinary tract infections. 1) Record review of a face sheet dated 5/23/2024 indicated Resident #13 was an [AGE] year-old male who admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of senile degeneration of the brain (memory loss/dementia), presence of urogenital implants and obstructive (placement of stents) and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-24 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that respiratory care was provided consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #44) reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #44's oxygen was set at 2-3 liters per minute as prescribed by physician. These failures could place residents requiring respiratory care at risk for respiratory infections or complications. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 5/22/2024 indicated Resident #44 was a [AGE] year-old male who admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of Alzheimer's Disease (dementia, memory loss disease), and obstructive and reflux uropathy (blocked or back flow of urine). Record review of a Significant Change MDS dated [DATE] indicated Resident #44 was usually understood, and usually understood others. The MDS indicated Resident #44's BIMS was a 7 indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated in Section J-Health…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-24 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure dialysis service were provided consistently with professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for dialysis services. (Resident #215) The facility failed to keep ongoing communication with the dialysis facility and did not ensure the post-dialysis assessments were completed for Resident #215. This failure could place residents who received dialysis at risk for complications and not receiving proper care and treatment to meet their needs. The findings included: Record review of Resident #215's face sheet, dated 05/24/2024, revealed Resident #215 was a [AGE] year-old male who initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of end stage renal disease (occurs when chronic kidney disease - the gradual loss of kidney function - reaches an advanced state). Record review of the Annual MDS assessment, dated 05/16/2024, revealed Resident #215 had clear speech and was understood by staff. The MDS revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-24 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who are trauma survivors receive culturally competent, trauma-informed care in accordance with professional standards of practice and accounting for residents' experiences and preferences in order to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization of the resident for 1 of 20 residents' (Resident #'s 38) reviewed for trauma-informed care. The facility did not ensure Resident #38 had a trauma screening that identified possible triggers when Resident #38 had a history of trauma. These failures could put residents at an increased risk for severe psychological distress due to re-traumatization. The findings included: Record review of the face sheet, dated 09/12/2023, indicated Resident #38 was a [AGE] year-old male, readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions), post-traumatic stress disorder ( a mental health condition…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-24 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents were free of significant medication errors for 2 of 3 residents (Residents #14 and #24) reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure Residents #14 and #24 medications were administered during the scheduled time. This failure could place residents at risk of medical complications and not receiving the therapeutic effects of their medications. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #14's face sheet, dated 05/22/2024, indicated Resident #14 was a [AGE] year-old-male, originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses which included multiple sclerosis (chronic, progressive disease involving damage to the sheaths of nerves cells in the brain and spinal cord causing numbness, impairment of speech, and of muscular coordination, blurred vison and sever fatigue), type 2 diabetes without diabetic neuropathy (chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar), essential…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-24 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to follow menus for 1 of 1 resident meal (breakfast) reviewed for menus. The facility failed to follow the breakfast menu for residents on 05/22/2024 . This failure could place residents at risk for dissatisfaction, poor intake, and diminished quality of life. Findings included: Record review of the daily menu posted outside the kitchen on 05/22/2024 at 7:00 a.m. indicated the breakfast meal scheduled for that day was: oatmeal, sausage patty, waffle. There was no sign indicating a substitution available from the menu. During an observation on 05/22/2024 at 7:05 a.m. of the steam table assembled with food ready to be plated for the breakfast meal indicated there was no sausage or waffle . During an interview on 05/22/2024 at 12:14 p.m., the Dietician Consultant stated she expected the menu to be followed. The Dietician Consultant stated the Dietary Manager should have contacted her and discussed a substitution since there was no sausage or waffle available. The Dietician Consultant stated it was important to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-24 · tag F0847 — isolated
    Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure the arbitration agreement was explained in a form and manner, including a language the resident or representative understood for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for arbitration agreements. (Resident #44) The facility failed to ensure the binding arbitration agreement was fully understood and explained to Resident #44's responsible party, prior to signing it as part of the admission packet. This failure could place the residents or the residents' responsible parties in binding agreements not fully understood, have a loss of their legal rights, and cause negative psychological issues. The findings included: Record review of the face sheet, dated 05/22/2024, revealed Resident #44 was a [AGE] year-old male who initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (brain disorder that causes memory loss, thinking problems and personality changes and gets worse over time), schizoaffective disorder (a mental disorder characterized…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-24 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to collaborate with hospice representatives and coordinate the hospice care planning process for each resident receiving hospice services, to ensure the quality of care for the resident, ensuring communication with the hospice medical director, the resident's attending physician, and others participating in the provision of care for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #13) reviewed for hospice services. The facility failed to ensure coordination of care with Resident #13's hospice provider. These deficient practices could place residents who receive hospice services at risk of receiving inadequate end-of-life care due to a lack of documentation, coordination of care, and communication of resident needs. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 5/23/2024 indicated Resident #13 was an [AGE] year-old male who admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of senile degeneration of the brain (memory loss/dementia), malnutrition, and high…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-24 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment were reported immediately to local law enforcement for 1 of 12 (Resident #2) residents reviewed for abuse, neglect, and misappropriation. HK A withdrew money from Resident #2's bank account. The facility failed to report the misappropriation to the local police and failed to thoroughly investigate the allegation of misappropriation. This failure could place residents at risk of misappropriation. Findings included: Review of a face sheet dated 03/24/24 showed Resident #2 was a [AGE] year-old admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of senile degeneration of the brain, COPD, and cognitive communication deficit. Resident #2 was his own responsible part. Review of a MDS dated [DATE] showed Resident #2 had a BIMS score of 11, which indicated he had moderately impaired cognition and was alert to person, time, place, and situation. Review of an incident report dated 10/04/23 showed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 12 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for Quality of Care. LVN A did not document neurological checks were completed after Resident #1 had an unwitnessed fall on [DATE]. The facility failed to ensure neuro checks were completed as ordered. LVN A failed to document Resident #1's use of anticoagulants on the change in condition form given to emergency responders and the hospital when Resident #1 was sent to the hospital due to a change in his condition. These failures could place residents at risk of physical harm or infection. Findings included: Review of a face-sheet dated [DATE] showed Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old male first admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Alzheimer's Disease, Hypertension, (high blood pressure) moderate protein malnutrition, Atrial fibrillation, (irregular heartbeat) Tracheostomy Status, (a tube inserted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, and interview the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, and comfortable environment for 4 of 4 restrooms reviewed. (Room #'s 1 and 3, 2, 5 and 7, and 6 and 8, and 2) The facility failed to ensure resident room #'s 1 and 3's restroom flooring was not discolored with black colored staining. The facility failed to ensure resident room [ROOM NUMBER]'s restroom flooring was not water stained and discolored, and the toilet caulking was brown and discolored. The toilet seat in room [ROOM NUMBER]'s restroom had worn areas with the wood material visible. The facility failed to ensure resident room #'s 5 and 7's restroom flooring appeared to have water damage and the caulking around the toilet was a brown and black color. The facility failed to ensure resident room #'s 6 and 8's restroom flooring was water damaged, torn, and coming unglued from the concrete floor. These failures could place residents at risk for falls, a diminished quality of life, and a diminished well-kept environment. Findings…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-14 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident had a right to reasonable accommodations of resident needs for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #'s 3 and 4) reviewed for accommodations of needs. The facility failed to have a bariatric shower chair available for showers for Resident #'s 3 and 4. This failure could place residents at risk for skin irritation, wounds, and a sense of loss of dignity. Findings included: 1) Record review of a face sheet dated 2/13/2024 indicated Resident #3 was a [AGE] year-old male who admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of heart failure, sepsis (severe systemic infection), and morbid obesity. Record review of the consolidated physician's orders dated 2/13/2024 indicated Resident #3 was being treated for MASD (moisture-associated skin damage). The physician's orders indicated on 1/10/2024 Resident #3 was ordered to cleanse bilateral lower extremities with wound cleanser, pat dry, apply ammonium lactate cream daily, and cleanse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-14 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to consult with the resident's physician when there was a significant change in the resident's physical and mental status that is, a deterioration in health, mental, or psychosocial status in either life-threatening conditions or clinical complications for 1 of 5 (Resident #2) residents reviewed for notification of change. The facility failed to notify Resident #2's physician when he continually refused his medications. These failures could result in residents with not receiving treatments, supplements, or medications to maintain health. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 2/14/2024 indicated Resident #2 was a [AGE] year-old male who admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of stroke, diabetes, kidney disease (stage 4) and absence of a kidney. Record review of an admission MDS dated [DATE] indicated Resident #2 was usually understood and usually understood others. The MDS indicated Resident #2 had no cognition…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-14 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to have evidence alleged violations were thoroughly investigated to prevent further abuse for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for neglect. (Resident #1). The facility failed to ensure a thorough investigation was conducted when Resident #1's family alleged Resident #1 was not provided care on 9/17/2023 from 10:43 p.m. to 5:27 a.m. on 9/18/2023. This failure placed residents at risk for further neglect of the provision of care. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 2/14/2024 indicated Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old male who admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of neurocognitive disorder with Lewy Bodies (a form of dementia with a gradual worsening over time), anxiety, and cognitive communication deficit (impaired functioning of attention, memory, perception, insight and judgement, organization, orientation, and language). Record review of the physician orders dated 9/01/2023 - 11/01/2023 indicated Resident #1 was prescribed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-14 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as usual body weight or desirable body weight range and electrolyte balance, unless the resident's clinical condition demonstrates that this is not possible or resident preferences indicate otherwise for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for nutritional status (Resident #1). The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 did not have a significant weight loss in 30 days. This failure could place residents at risk for malnourishment, illness, skin breakdown, and decreased quality of life. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 2/14/2024 indicated Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old male who admitted on [DATE] and discharged on 9/19/2023 with the diagnoses of neurocognitive disorder with Lewy Bodies (a form of dementia with a gradual worsening over time), anxiety, and cognitive communication deficit (impaired functioning of attention, memory, perception, insight and judgement, organization,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-14 · tag F0840 — isolated
    Employ or obtain outside professional resources to provide services in the nursing home when the facility does not employ a qualified professional to furnish a required service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #'s 3 and 4) reviewed for comprehensive person-centered care plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3 was scheduled a specialty vision appointment, a cardiology appointment, and a gastrologist appointment as ordered. The facility failed to ensure Resident #4 was scheduled a sleep study and an echocardiogram as ordered. These failures could place residents at risk for inadequate monitoring of their health status. Findings included: 1) Record review of a face sheet dated 2/13/2024 indicated Resident #3 was a [AGE] year-old male who admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of heart failure,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure that the resident environment remains as free of accident hazards as is possible to prevent accidents for 2 of 6 locked doors (employee smoke door and exit door on the northeast hall) reviewed for accidents and hazards. The facility did not ensure the employee smoke door and the exit on the northeast hall remained locked with the alarm engaged. This failure could place residents at risk for injury from elopement to unsafe areas around the facility. The findings included: Record review of the At risk for elopement on open unit list, provided by the facility on 10/07/23, revealed Resident #7 and Resident #8 were at risk for elopement. Record review of the maintenance work orders log for July 2023, August 2023, September 2023, and October 2023 revealed no work orders for door alarms or unlocked doors. During a observation of the facility and interview with the Maintenance Director on 10/06/23 beginning at 10:54 AM, revealed the employee smoke door and the exit on the northeast hall had a red alarm and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure all drugs were stored in a locked compartment, only accessible by authorized personnel for 1 of 2 (women's secured unit) medication carts reviewed for storage of medications. The facility did not ensure MA A kept the medication cart on the women's secured unit locked or within her line of site. This failure could place residents at risk for misuse of medication and overdose, drug diversions, adverse reactions of medications, and not receiving the therapeutic benefit of medications. The findings included: During an observation on 10/06/23 between 10:28 AM and 10:36 AM, the medication cart on the secured unit was unlocked. The medication cart was located behind a half door that was in arms-reach from the desk counter. No facility staff were in eyes view of the medication cart. There were several residents walking around the secured unit. During an interview on 10/06/23 at 10:36 AM, MA A returned to the nurses' desk and stated that was the cart that contained resident's medications. MA A did not lock the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and provide care in a manner that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 6 of 21 residents (Resident #2, Resident #7, Resident #29, Resident #44, Resident #54, and Resident #58) and 1 of 1 staff (CNA N) reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 was treated with dignity and respect when CNA H did not refrain from using his cell phone while assisting Resident #2 with dining. The facility failed to ensure Resident #29's catheter drainage bag was not visible from the hallway. The facility failed to ensure Resident #54, and Resident #58 were served lunch at the same time as the other residents at the table. The facility did not ensure CNA N treated residents with dignity and respect by referring to them as feeders. The facility failed to ensure Resident #7, Resident #44, and Resident #58 were provided with smoke breaks at 5:30 p.m. These…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-09 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure all allegations of abuse and neglect, had evidence that all alleged violations were thoroughly investigated, and failed to report the results of all investigations to other officials in accordance with State law, including to the State Survey Agency, within 5 working days of the incident for 3 of 8 residents (Residents #8, #10, and #264) reviewed for investigating alleged violations of abuse and neglect. 1. Incident investigation regarding Resident #8's allegation of neglect did not have interviews, in-services, or witness statements, attached to the investigation. 2. The facility failed to report evidence that a thorough investigation was conducted, failed to complete a provider investigative report (Form 3613A), and failed to report the results of the investigation when Resident #10 and Resident #264 had a resident-to resident altercation in the locked unit dining room which resulted in injury to Resident #10. These failures could place…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-09 · tag F0636 — pattern
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to complete a comprehensive resident-centered assessment of each resident's cognitive, medical, and functional capacity in a timely manner for 4 of 21 residents (Resident's #9, #51, #164, and #165) reviewed for comprehensive assessments and timing. The facility failed to complete Resident #9, Resident #51, Resident #164, and Resident #165's admission MDS assessment within 14 days of admission. This failure could place residents at risk of not having their needs identified and met. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #9's face sheet, dated 03/08/2023, revealed Resident #9 was a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of metabolic encephalopathy (brain disorder caused by various diseases or toxins that affect the body's chemistry and disrupt the brain's function), type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications (high blood sugar), and schizoaffective disorder (mental health disorder that is marked by a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for 7 of 21 residents (Resident #13, Resident #26, Resident #51, Resident #53, Resident #54, Resident #57, and Resident #165) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to develop and implement a care plan for Resident #13 and Resident #26's contractures. The facility failed to care plan Resident #51's use of the psychotropic medication Risperdal (antipsychotic medication used to treat certain mental/mood disorders) and diagnosis of PTSD (Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder). The facility failed to care plan Resident #53's use of the medication Seroquel (antipsychotic medication used to treat certain mental/mood conditions). The facility failed to care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure necessary services to maintain grooming and personal hygiene were provided for 5 of 6 residents reviewed for ADLs. (Resident #9, #11, #12, #44, and #58) 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #9 received her scheduled showers and facial hair removal. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #11 was provided incontinent care and facial hair removal. 3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #12's hair was combed, and nails were cleaned and trimmed. 4.The facility failed to ensure Resident #44 was routinely showered. 5. The facility failed to ensure Resident #58 was routinely showered. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving services/care, decreased quality of life, and decreased self-esteem. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #9's face sheet, dated 03/08/2023, revealed Resident #9 was a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of metabolic encephalopathy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-09 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received appropriate treatment and services to prevent further decrease of ROM for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for range of motion. (Resident's #8, #13, and #26) 1. The facility did not ensure Resident #8 had a contracture prevention device in place for the treatment of her right contracted hand. 2. The facility did not ensure Resident #13 had a contracture prevention device in place for the treatment of her right contracted knee, left contracted knee, and left contracted hand. 3. The facility did not ensure Resident #26 had interventions in place for his left contracted arm. This failure could place residents at risk for decrease in mobility and range of motion and contribute to worsening of contractures. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #8's face sheet, dated 03/08/2023, revealed Resident #8 was a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of unspecified dementia without…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-09 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide food that was palatable and served at an appetizing temperature for 3 of 3 residents (Residents #52, #11, and #22) reviewed for palatable food. The facility failed to provide palatable food served at an appetizing temperature or taste to residents' who complained the food was served cold and did not taste good. This failure could place residents who ate food from the kitchen at risk of weight loss, altered nutritional status, and diminished quality of life. Findings include: 1. During an interview on 03/06/2023 at 10:36 a.m., Resident #52 stated the food was cold and bland. Resident #52 stated he has been purchasing his own food over the last 8 months due to the food not tasting good. Resident #52 stated he has reported the food complaints to staff but could not remember their names. 2. During an interview on 03/06/2023 at 10:38 a.m., Resident #11 stated the food was too salty and cold sometimes. Resident #11 stated she had mentioned the food complaints to facility staff before but did not remember to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety in the facility's only kitchen. The facility failed to ensure: 1. Food items were dated and labeled. 2. Expired food item was discarded. 3. The microwave was clean and free of food debris. 4. Hair restraints were worn appropriately by dietary staff. 5. The deep fryer was free of grease build up. These failures could place residents at risk for foodborne illness. Findings include: 1. During an observation in the refrigerators and freezers on 03/06/2023 starting at 10:26 a.m. revealed an unlabeled plastic bag with a date 02/27/2023 that was identified by the Dietary Manager as sliced ham; 1 gallon of a liquid substance identified by the Dietary Manager as tea unlabeled and undated; 1 clear container identified by the Dietary Manager as pears unlabeled and undated; 1 container of frozen strawberry slices undated; and 2 gallons of 2% milk…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-09 · tag F0813 — pattern
    Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary storage of resident's food items for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for personal food safety. (Resident's #9, #22, and #26) The facility did not implement the personal food policy related to personal refrigerators for Resident's #9, #22, or #26. These failures could place the residents at risk for food borne illness. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #11's face sheet, dated 03/07/2023, revealed Resident #11 was an [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of cerebral infarction (stroke), heart failure (progressive heart disease that affects pumping action of the heart muscles), and anxiety disorder (characterized by excessive fear or worry). Record review of the MDS assessment, dated 12/16/2022, revealed Resident #11 had clear speech and was usually understood by staff. The MDS revealed Resident #11 was usually able to understand others. The MDS revealed Resident #11…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 6 of 6 staff (LVN A, LVN B, LVN E, CNA K, CNA V, and CNA X), 1 of 1 shower room (north hall shower room), and 1 of 1 facility reported incident reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure the sharps containers located in the north hall shower room were emptied and not overfilled. The facility did not ensure LVN A performed hand hygiene between glove changes while administrating insulin (helps blood sugar enter the body's cell to be used for energy) to Resident #27. The facility did not ensure LVN B disinfected the wrist blood pressure monitor between Resident #19 and #33. The facility failed to ensure LVN E, CNA K, CNA V, and CNA X wore a face mask properly while in patient care areas. These failures could place residents and staff at risk for cross-contamination and the spread…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-09 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure residents have the right to be informed in advance, by the physician or other practitioner or professional, of the risks and benefits of proposed care, of treatment and treatment alternatives and to choose the option he or she prefers for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for right to be informed. (Resident #30) The facility failed to ensure Resident #30 had signed psychotropic consent forms for Risperdal (antipsychotic) and buspirone (antianxiety). This failure could place residents at risk for treatment or services without informed consent. The findings included: Record review of Resident #30's face sheet, dated 03/09/2023, revealed Resident #30 was a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of anxiety disorder (intense, excessive and persistent worry and fear about everyday situations) and schizoaffective disorder (mental health disorder that is marked by a combination of schizophrenia symptoms, such as hallucinations…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-09 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident was informed before, or at the time of admission, and periodically during the residents stay, of services available in the facility and of changes for those services, which included changes for services not covered under Medicare/Medicaid or by the facility's per diem rate for 2 of 3 residents (Residents #57 and #42) reviewed for Medicare/Medicaid coverage. The facility failed to ensure Residents #57 and #42 were given a SNF ABN when discharged from skilled services at the facility prior to covered days being exhausted. This failure could place residents at risk for not being aware of changes to provided services. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #57's face sheet, dated 03/08/2023, indicated Resident #57 was a [AGE] year-old male, originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis which included Alzheimer's (progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions), essential…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, and comfortable environment for 1 of 3 shower rooms (north hall) and 1 of 22 rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER]) reviewed for a homelike environment. The facility failed to ensure the north hall shower room was clean. The facility failed to repair a missing tile on the wall in front of the toilet in room [ROOM NUMBER]'s bathroom, leaving a hole in the wall. The facility failed to repair a fallen tile on the wall inside of the bathroom by the doorframe in room [ROOM NUMBER], exposing the sheetrock and leaving the tile against the wall in upright position. This failure could place residents at risk for a diminished quality of life and a diminished clean well-kept environment. Findings included: 1.During an observation on 03/06/23 at 11:52 AM, the north hall shower room had feces all over the shower room floor. During an interview on 03/09/23 at 8:06 AM, CNA B stated she walked in the north hall shower room daily because that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-09 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure prompt efforts were made to resolve grievances for 1 of 1 residents (Residents#52) reviewed for grievances. The facility did not ensure Residents #52's grievances related to protein bars was resolved. This failure could place resident at risk for grievances not being addressed or resolved promptly. Findings included: Record review of Resident #52's consolidated face sheet dated 03/09/23 indicated he was a [AGE] year-old male that was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #52 had a diagnosis of congestive heart failure (the heart does not pump blood as it should), HTN (the force of the blood against the artery walls is too high) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (lung disease that blocks the airflow and makes it difficult to breathe). Record review of the MDS dated [DATE] indicated Resident #52 had a BIMS of 12 for mild cognitive impairment. Record review of the grievance and complaint report dated 10/24/22 indicated Resident #52…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-09 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the assessment accurately reflect the status of 1 of 24 residents reviewed for assessment accuracy (Resident #57). The facility failed to accurately reflect Resident #57's weight loss of 5% of more that was indicated on the MDS. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving care and services to meet their needs. Findings included: Record review of Resident #57's face sheet dated 03/09/23 indicated he was a [AGE] year-old male that was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #57 had a diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions), Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar) and HTN (the force of the blood against the artery walls was too height). Record review of Resident #57's MDS dated [DATE] indicated he had a BIMS score of 2 indicating severe impairment. Resident #57's MDS indicated he weighed 148 lbs. and was on a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-09 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to develop the baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #4) reviewed for baseline care plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #4 had a baseline care plan completed within 48 hours of admission This failure could affect residents by not addressing their physical, mental, and psychosocial needs for each resident to attain or maintain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial outcome. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 03/09/2023 revealed, Resident #4 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of schizoaffective disorder (mental disorder characterized by delusions, hallucinations, disorganized thoughts, speech, and behavior), bipolar type, type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications (chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar), and essential (primary) hypertension (high blood pressure). Record review of Resident #4's assessments…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-09 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to ensure that a resident's abilities in activities of daily living do not diminish based on the comprehensive assessment and consistent with the resident's needs and choices for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #15 and Resident #165) reviewed for activities of daily living. The facility failed to assess Resident #15's and Resident #165's need for communication assistance to effectively communicate with staff. This failure could place residents at risk for decline and diminished quality of life. Findings included: 1. Record review of a face sheet dated 03/09/2023, revealed Resident #15 was an [AGE] year-old-male initially admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of NSTEMI (non-st elevation myocardial infarction- damage of the heart muscle caused by a loss of blood supply due to blocked arteries), Alzheimer's disease (progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure that each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #51) reviewed for accidents, hazards and supervision. The facility failed to ensure LVN C and the DON transferred Resident #51 appropriately with the use of a gait belt. This failure could place residents who require assistance with transfers at risk for falls, pain, and injuries. The findings included: Record review of Resident #51's face sheet, dated 03/09/2023, revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions), Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, acute (a mental health condition that's triggered by a terrifying event, either experiencing it or witnessing it), and major depressive disorder, recurrent, severe with psychotic symptoms (a serious mood disorder involving one or more episodes of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-09 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents requiring respiratory care were provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practices for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #52 and Resident #33) reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to administer oxygen at 2 liters per minute via nasal cannula as prescribed by the physician for Resident #52. The facility failed to administer oxygen at 2 - 3 liters per minute via nasal cannula as prescribed by the physician and ensure the filter door vents were free of debris for Resident #33. This failure could place residents who receive respiratory care at risk for developing respiratory complications. Findings Included: Record review of Resident #52's face sheet dated 03/09/23 indicated he was a [AGE] year-old male that was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #52 had a diagnosis of congestive heart failure (the heart does not pump blood as it should), HTN (the force of the blood against the artery…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-09 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure pain management was provided to residents who require such services consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for pain management. (Resident #52) The facility failed to ensure Resident #52 had effective pain management by not making an appointment or attempting to schedule an appointment with pain management after resident was discharged from hospice care. This failure could place resident at risk for increased pain causing undo suffering. Findings included: Record review of Resident #52's face sheet dated 03/09/23 indicated he was a [AGE] year-old male that was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #52 had a diagnosis of congestive heart failure (the heart does not pump blood as it should), HTN (the force of the blood against the artery walls is too high) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (lung disease that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-09 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure dialysis service were provided consistently with professional standards of practice for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for dialysis services. (Residents #26 and Resident #44) The facility failed to keep ongoing communication with the dialysis facility for Resident #26 and Resident #44. This failure could place residents who received dialysis at risk for complications and not receiving proper care and treatment to meet their needs. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #26's face sheet, dated 03/08/2023, revealed Resident #26 was a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of end stage renal disease (occurs when chronic kidney disease - the gradual loss of kidney function - reaches an advanced state), type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy (high blood sugar that has caused nerve damage), and hemiplegia and hemiparesis affecting left non-dominant side (conditions that cause weakness or paralysis…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-09 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that it was free of medication error rate of 5 percent or greater. The facility had a medication error rate of 20%, based on 5 errors out of 25 opportunities, which involved 1 of 4 residents (Resident #19) reviewed for medication administration. The facility failed to ensure Resident #19 received amlodipine besylate 10 mg, ASA 81 mg, doxazosin mesylate 4 mg, vitamin B12 1000 mcg, and vitamin D3 2000 IU between 6:00 a.m. and 8:00 a.m. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving the intended therapeutic benefit of their medications or receiving them as prescribed, per physician orders. Findings included: Record review of Resident #19's order summary report, dated 03/08/2023, indicated Resident #19 was a [AGE] year-old male, admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis included memory deficient following cerebral infarction (stroke), essential hypertension (high blood pressure), and CKD (kidneys cease functioning on a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles in locked compartments and permit only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for 1 of 2 medication carts (Nurse Northwest Hall) reviewed for storage of drugs. The facility failed to ensure Northwest Hall nurse cart was locked when unattended. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of medication misuse and diversion. Findings include: During an observation on 03/06/2023 at 11:52 a.m., LVN A left the Northwest Hall medication cart unlocked and out of sight while administering Resident #27's medication. During an interview on 03/06/2023 at 12:00 p.m., LVN A stated she should have locked the medication cart prior to going in Resident #27's room. LVN A stated she was under the impression since the cart was facing the doorway it was ok to keep it unlocked. LVN A stated after she thought about it, she realized her back was turned away from the cart and out of her sight. LVN A stated this…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-09 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #165) reviewed for therapeutic diets. The facility failed to ensure Resident #165 received a pureed diet and honey thick liquids as ordered by the physician. This failure could place residents at risk for poor intake, weight loss, unmet nutritional needs, choking, and aspiration (when food or drinks enter the lungs). Findings included: Record review of Resident #165's face sheet, dated 03/09/2023, revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses of profound intellectual disabilities (inability to live independently, needing close supervision, limited communication, and physical restrictions), hypothyroidism (thyroid gland does not produce enough thyroid hormone), and unspecified mood (affective) disorder (mental disorders that primarily affect a person's emotional state). Record review of Resident #165's comprehensive MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure medical records were maintained in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices on each resident and accurately documented for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #19) reviewed for accuracy of medical records. The facility did not ensure Resident #19 ASA order had the medication dosage listed. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the correct medication dosage. The findings included: Record review of Resident #19's order summary report, dated 03/08/2023, indicated Resident #19 was a [AGE] year-old male, admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis included memory deficient following cerebral infarction (stroke), essential hypertension (high blood pressure), and CKD (kidneys cease functioning on a permanent basis). Record review of the MAR dated 03/01/2023-03/31/2023 revealed Resident #19 had an order for ASA with a start date of 08/19/2022. The MAR did not address the medication dosage. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-09 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's medical record included documentation that indicates the resident received education on the influenza and the pneumococcal immunizations of 3 of 5 residents (Residents #53, #21, and #57) reviewed for immunizations. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #53's medical record contained evidence of education on the influenza vaccine when the vaccine was administered to the resident. 2.The facility failed to ensure Resident #21's medical record contained evidence of education on the pneumococcal immunization when the vaccine was administered to the resident. The facility failed to ensure Resident #21's medical record contained evidence of education on the influenza vaccine when the vaccine was administered to the resident. 3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #57's medical record contained evidence of education on the pneumococcal immunization when the vaccine was administered to the resident. The facility failed to ensure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$223,296 in federal fines across 5 penalties. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.

  • $16,149 — penalty dated 2025-06-25
  • $16,149 — penalty dated 2025-06-25
  • $127,486 — penalty dated 2024-05-24
  • $12,259 — penalty dated 2024-02-14
  • $51,253 — penalty dated 2023-10-09
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-07-25 for 7 days
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-11-08 for 22 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to FOCUSED POST ACUTE CARE PARTNERS — 25 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 51.9-0.9 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.1-1.1 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.2-0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.0≈ chain avg
The other 24 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.9★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
FPACP MOUNT PLEASANT LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL100%since 02/01/2017
FOCUSED POST ACUTE CARE PARTNERS LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2017
CONLEY, SHAWNIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/01/2017
MCKENZIE, MARKIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/01/2017
STRUBBE, LORETTAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/01/2018
FOCUSED POST ACUTE CARE PARTNERS MANAGEMENT, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2017
EASLEY, ADRIEANNIAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/01/2023
ONEY, WHITNEYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/04/2020
WILLARD, LORIIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/14/2025
ZARCONE, GREGORYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/19/2021

CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$4.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-20.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$243K
Related-party expense4% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 70%Medicare 5%Other / private 25%

This home reported $243K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$277per resident / day
operating cost
$8,422per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$230per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Texas
$5,627/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,666/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 455900. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-02, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next