Focused Care at Midland
2000 N Main St, Midland, TX 79705 · For profit - Corporation · 106 certified beds · (432) 686-1898 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (48) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $9,281 in federal fines (most recent 2025-05-06)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 22.9% | 15.8% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.8% | 3.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.4% | 0.3% | 0.9% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.0% | 0.8% | 2.0% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.3% | 2.4% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 8.0% | 3.3% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 8.1% | 14.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 18.8% | 18.0% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.0% | 3.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 10.6% | 13.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 24.8% | 9.6% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.42 | 2.17 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.14 | 2.06 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 37% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.4%CMS range 7.1–15.7 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.03 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 106 beds and averages 83.0 residents a day — about 78% occupied, or roughly 23 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.95 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.44 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.16 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.58 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.10 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.45 to 0.43 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 41% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
48 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 37 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-05-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remains as free of accident hazards as is possible and each resident receives adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents and supervision, in that: Resident #1 eloped on 11/19/24 out of the facility and across a 35-mph street and was found at a school 0.8 miles away 2 hours later by police. An IJ was identified on 5/2/25. The IJ template was provided to the facility on 5/2/25 at 12:44 PM. While the IJ was removed on 5/2/2025 at 8:35 PM. The facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and severity level of no actual harm with a potential for more than minimal harm that is an immediate jeopardy due to facility's need to evaluate the plan of removal. This failure could place residents at risk of severe injury or even death. The Findings were: Review of Resident #1's admission Record, dated 4/29/25, revealed he was a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-11 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all alleged violations involving of abuse were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, to other officials (including to the State Agency) for two (Resident #1and Resident #2) of 4 residents reviewed for reporting an allegation of abuse, in that: The facility failed to report, within 2 hours, an allegation of physical altercation between Resident #1 and Resident #2 that occurred on 05/24/2026. This failure could result in unreported incidents of abuse and lead to physical and psychological injuries to residents. Findings included:Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 6.10.26 reflected an [AGE] year-old male with an initial admission date of 3.31.26, with diagnoses which included Dementia, Muscle weakness and Muscle wasting. Record review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS assessment section C, cognitive patterns, dated 4.6.26 reflected a BIMS score of 6 (severe impairment). Record review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-11 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have evidence that all allegations of abuse were thoroughly investigated for 2 of 4 residents (Resident #1 and #2) reviewed for abuse and neglect. The facility did not investigate an incident in which Resident #1 was in an alteration with Resident #2 on 05/24/2026. This failure could place residents at risk for continued abuse/neglect and could lead to a diminished quality of life and psychosocial harm. The findings included:Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 6.10.26 reflected an [AGE] year-old male with an initial admission date of 3.31.26, with diagnoses which included Dementia, Muscle weakness and Muscle wasting. Record review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS assessment section C, cognitive patterns, dated 4.6.26 reflected a BIMS score of 6 (severe impairment). Record review of Resident #2's face sheet dated 6.10.26 reflected a [AGE] year-old male with an initial admission date of 5.29.24, with diagnoses which included Epilepsy, muscle…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for each resident that included measurable objectives and time frames to meet, attain, and/or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 4 (Residents #2) residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans. The facility failed to have a care plan for Resident #2's regarding refusals of medications. The failure could place residents at risk for not receiving appropriate care and supervision. The findings included:Record review of Resident #2's face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old male with an initial admission date of 5.29.24, with diagnoses which included Epilepsy, muscle wasting and Dementia. Record review of Resident #2's quarterly MDS assessment section C, cognitive patterns, dated 4.11.26 reflected a BIMS score of 4 (severe impairment). Record review of Resident #2's progress notes by RN B dated 6/3/2026 7:07 pm indicated: Behavior…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that each resident has a right to secure and confidential personal and medical records for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 residents reviewed for confidentiality.The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's face sheet and personal information was not given to a hospice provider without the permission of the resident's guardian.This deficient practice could place residents at risk of having their medical information being unnecessarily exposed and their personal privacy violated.The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 4.23.26 reflected a [AGE] year-old female with an initial admission date of 10/22/24, with diagnoses which included vascular dementia, mood disturbance and anxiety. Record review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS assessment section C, cognitive patterns, dated 2/5/26 reflected a BIMS score of 11 (moderate impairment). During a phone interview on 4.23.26 at 1:05 pm Resident #1's Guardian stated she became the guardian…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolatedMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program so that the facility was free of pests and rodents for one, Resident #2, of five residents reviewed for environmental concerns. 1. The facility failed to ensure the facility was free of mice. This failure could place residents at risk of having pests in their rooms and insect bites.Findings included: Record review of Resident #2's face sheet dated 4.23.26 reflected a [AGE] year-old male with an initial admission date of 1/25/24, with diagnoses which included depressive disorder, anxiety, and muscle weakness. Record review of Resident #2's quarterly MDS assessment 2/5/26, section C, cognitive patterns, reflected a BIMS score of 13 (intact cognition). During an interview on 4.22.26 at 1:45 pm the HD stated that they did have some mice. She stated it used to be a lot worse, but they had been working with pest control weekly. She stated that everything really started reducing about 3 weeks ago. She…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation and food storage. - The facility failed to ensure stored foods were properly stored, labeled, and dated.- The facility failed to ensure temperatures were checked for food items prior to serving.- The facility failed to ensure food was not handled with bare hands.- The facility failed to ensure residents received preferred portion sizes.- The facility failed to ensure that spoiled food items were disposed of properly.- The facility failed to ensure dietary staff used facial hair restraints properly. - The facility failed to ensure dietary staff wore closed shoes.- The facility failed to ensure personal food items were not stored in 1 of 2 of the kitchen refrigerators. These failures could place residents at risk of food-borne illnesses and cross-contamination. Findings included: - Observation and interview on 08/02/25 at 11:20 AM revealed Dietary Aide…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-02 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to prepare food that was safe, palatable and attractive for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for food and nutrition services. The facility failed to ensure Dietary Aide (DA) C followed the puree recipes when preparing pureed food items.The facility failed to deliver food with an appetizing taste for the lunch meal on 08/02/2025. This failure could place residents at risk of decreased food intake, hunger, unwanted weight loss, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included:Interview with a confidential resident on 08/02/2025 at 10:05 AM, the resident stated the food from the kitchen sucks and was not hot. Interview with a confidential resident on 08/02/2025 at 10:15 AM, the resident stated the food is not good.Interview with a confidential resident on 08/02/2025 at 10:20 AM, the resident stated the food is hot but is crap.Interview with a confidential resident on 08/02/2025 at 10:30 AM, the resident stated the food is not good.Observation on 08/02/2025 at 1:20 PM revealed DA C placed two pieces of sliced bread into…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-02 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public for 3 of 3 resident smoking areas reviewed for environmental concerns. The facility failed to ensure adequate cleaning in the designated smoking areas. This failure placed the staff and visitors at risk of an uncomfortable and unsafe environment.Findings included: During an observation on 08/2/25 at 6:25 p.m., in smoking area 1 the grass/weeds were approximately 24 inches high. There was trash including used glove, paper, cans, food wrappers. Smoked cigarette butts littered the ground throughout the area. This area is shared by men's locked unit E and men's locked unit F.During an observation on 8/2/2025 at 6:30PM in smoking area 2 Women's Locked Unit from hall C. There was litter scattered on the ground including paper, cans, cups, food wrappers. Smoked cigarette (butts) littered on ground throughout area. The trash can was overflowing.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to treat residents with respect, dignity and care for each resident in a manner that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 2 of 7 residents (Resident # 63 and #136), and 5 residents in the confidential group interview. CNA F told Resident #63 to urinate in her brief instead of going to the bathroom per Resident # 63's request. Staff were on their cell phones while providing direct care to residents (including Resident #136). This failure resulted in a diminished quality of life for the identified residents and could affect additional residents by causing a loss of self-esteem and increased isolation. The findings included: Record review of Resident #63''s admission Record, dated 6/18/25, revealed she was an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia, pain, and need for personal care. Record review of Resident #63's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], revealed: She had a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-19 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that drug records were in order and that an account of all controlled drugs were maintained, for 8 of 10 Residents (#5, #11, #34, #45, #56, #62, #63 and #186) and 1 of 2 medication carts inspected for medication reconciliation. Medication Aide (MA) A did not document the administration of a controlled medication on the individual controlled medication records after administering the medication. This failure could place residents at risk of under dose, overdose and drug diversion. The findings were: RESIDENT #5 Record review of Resident #5's admission record, dated 06/18/25, indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of epilepsy (a brain disease that causes repeated seizures due to abnormal electrical signals). He was [AGE] years of age. Record review of Resident #5's order summary report dated 06/18/2025 indicated in part: Phenytoin Sodium Extended Oral Capsule 100 MG. Give 1 capsule by mouth three times a day…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 37 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remains as free of accident hazards as is possible and each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 5 (Resident #48) residents reviewed for smoking safety. The facility failed to ensure Resident #48's lighter, and cigarettes were not stored on their person. These failures could affect residents who smoke by putting them at risk of bodily harm or physical impairment. The findings included: Review of Resident #48's admission Record, dated 6/19/25, revealed he was a [AGE] year old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including tobacco use. Review of Resident #48's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], revealed: He scored a 15 of 15 on his mental status exam (indicating he was cognitively intact). He needed set up or was independent with his ADLs. Review of Resident #48's Care Plan, last revised on 1/22/23 revealed: Resident #48 was an independent smoker, and he could go to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-19 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure medical records, in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, were maintained on each resident that were accurately documented for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #8) reviewed for medical records. The facility failed to ensure documentation was completed for Resident #8's emergency room visit on 05/28/2025. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of having inaccurate records due to incomplete documentation. Finding included: Record review of Resident #8's admission Record dated 06/19/2025 revealed she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included diabetes mellitus, atrial fibrillation (irregular heartbeat), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (lung disease that blocks airflow and causes difficulty breathing), and bipolar disorder. She was her own responsible party. Record review of Resident #8's Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a mental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-06 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide notification of a resident's discharge to ensure that appropriate information is communicated to the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman for 1 or 6 residents (Resident #2 ) reviewed for transfer or discharge. The facility failed to ensure that: 1. Resident #2's discharge notification was sent to the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman. This deficient practice could affect resident's safe discharge planning by missed notification to the proper authorities. The findings included: Review of Resident #2's Order Summary Report active 1/09/24, undated, revealed Resident #2 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses included high blood pressure, substance dependence in remission, bipolar disorder (mental illness shown by extreme and sudden mood swings) and diabetes. Review of Resident #2's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 12/24/24, revealed: Resident #2 had a mental status of 15 of 15 (indicating he was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person -centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a residents medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for supervision related care plans. 1. The facility failed to ensure a care plan was updated for Resident #1's elopements . These failures could place residents at risk for not receiving necessary care and services or having psychosocial care needs identified. Findings include: Review of Resident #1's admission Record, dated 4/29/25, revealed he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia with behavioral disturbance, brief psychotic disorder (had an episode of seeing things that were there or believing things that were completely irrational). Review of Resident #1 quarterly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices, for 1 Resident (#1) of 5 residents whose care was reviewed, in that: The facility failed to complete weekly skin assessments from 07/16/2024 to 09/23/2024 on Resident #1 at a minimum of every 7 days per facility policy. The facility failed to assess and provide treatment on 09/23/2024 when there were no orders for Edema on bilateral lower legs for Resident #1 observed with seeping serosanguinous fluid. This failure could place residents for not being provided with adequate care and treatment and place them at risk for skin breakdown, infection, pain, and a decline in health. The findings included: Record review of Resident's #1 admission Record dated 09/19/2024 reflected a [AGE] year-old male, admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1's diagnoses included…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-25 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary comfortable, environment for residents, staff, and the public for 6 of 6 hallways reviewed, including the dining room and kitchen for physical environment. The facility failed to ensure the floors were free of dirt and crumbs in the 6 hallways, dining room, and the kitchen on 09/19/2024 and 09/24/2024 that had dirt and food crumbs along the walls at the intersection between the floor and wall. This failure could the residents by placing them at risk for diminished quality of life due to the lack of a well-kept environment. Findings included: In an observation of the facility on 09/19/2024 at 11:00 am, the floors in each of the 6 hallways had dirt and food crumbs along the walls at the baseboards. In the dining room, the floors were soiled and dirt and food crumbs along the walls at the baseboards. In an observation of the facility on 09/24/2024 at 11:20 am, the floors in each of the 6 hallways had dirt and food crumbs along the walls at the baseboards. In the dining room,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-25 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain clinical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices that are complete and accurately documented for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for signing self in and out of the facility. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 signed in and out of the facility when he left for pass. Resident #1 failed to sign out of the facility on 08/08/2024 and 08/17/2024. He failed to sign back into the facility after being out on pass on 08/02/2024, 08/05/2024, 08/11/2024, 08/20/2024, 08/30/2024, 09/01/2024, 09/04/2024, 09/06/2024, and 09/19/2024. This failure could place residents for not being provided with adequate care and treatment when signed out of the facility and evaluated when residents return to the facility. Findings included: Record review of Resident's #1 admission Record dated 09/19/2024 reflected a [AGE] year-old male, admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1's diagnoses included Paranoid Schizophrenia…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #2) reviewed for infection control practices, in that: CNA A and Hospitality Aid B failed to perform proper hand hygiene after glove changes while providing incontinence care to Resident #2 on 09/19/2024. This failure could place residents at risk for the spread of infection. The findings included: Record review of Resident #2's admission Record, dated 09/09/2024, reflected a [AGE] year-old male, with the latest admission date of 07/08/2024. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction (stroke) and need for assistance with personal care. Record review of Resident #2's Comprehensive Care Plan, dated as last revised on 09/11/2024 reflected: Focus: I have an ADL self-care performance deficit related to stroke.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for each resident that included measurable objectives and time frames to meet, attain, and/or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 3 of 5 residents (Resident #2, #3, and 4) reviewed for care plans in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 had a care plan in place to address EBP addressing his pressure ulcers or catheter. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3 had a care plan in place to address EBP addressing his catheter, feeding tube, or pressure ulcer. The facility failed to ensure Resident #4 had a care in place to address EBP addressing his catheter and pressure injury. This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk of not receiving individualized care and services to meet their needs. The findings include: RESIDENT #2 Review of Resident #2's admission Record, dated 8/29/24, revealed he was a [AGE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 3 of 4 residents (Residents #2, #3, and #4) reviewed for Enhanced Barrier Protections (EBP) for infection control practices. The facility failed to ensure Residents #2, #3, and #4 were identified for and had implemented Enhanced Barrier Precautions. This failure could place resident's risk for cross contamination and the spread of infection. Finding included: RESIDENT #2 Review of Resident #2's admission Record, dated 8/29/24, revealed he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including stoke, chronic osteomyelitis (bone infection) of left ankle and foot), stage IV pressure ulcer of sacral region (tail bone), stage III pressure ulcer of right hip, and neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who required dialysis (treatment that filters water and waste from the blood when the kidneys are no longer able to do so) received such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #1) reviewed for dialysis. The facility failed to ensure post-dialysis assessments were completed for Resident #1 after returns from dialysis treatment. This deficient practice could affect residents who received dialysis treatments and placed them at risk for complications and not receiving adequate care and treatment to meet their needs. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's admission Record, dated 8/28/24, revealed he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes, stage 5 chronic kidney disease (end stage renal disease usually accompanied by dialysis). Resident #1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for each resident that included measurable objectives and time frames to meet, attain, and/or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 5 of 10 (Residents # 33, #37, #72, #79 and #137) residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans. 1.The facility failed to ensure Resident #33 dated 01/20/24 had a care plan in place regarding his urinary catheter. 2.The facility failed to ensure Resident #37 had a care plan in place regarding her PEG (percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy) tube. 3.The facility failed to ensure Resident #72 had a care plan in place regarding his urinary catheter. 4.The facility failed to ensure Resident #79 had a care plan in place for significant, unplanned weight loss. 5.The facility failed to ensure Resident #137 had a care plan in place for the use of psychotropic medication. These failures could place residents at risk…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and that the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible for all of the residents in the facility's 3 secured units (Hall C, E and F ) reviewed for accidents and supervision. The facility failed to ensure the secure units exit doors at the end of each hall had alarms to indicate and alert staff that the residents were going outside to the secure unit patios on 04/09/24 through 04/11/24. This failure placed residents at risk of injury due to not being supervised and placed at risk of accidents/hazards. Findings included: During observations from 04/09/24 through 04/11/24 several residents were observed in the men's and women's secure units going in and out to the secure unit patios. Residents were seen sitting down in the chairs provided outside and then seen walking back inside. Staff were seen in the secure units monitoring the residents that were inside but not necessarily the residents that were out in the patios. During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the facility's only kitchen. The facility failed to: Provide a clean kitchen. Ensure food items in the freezer were labeled and dated. Ensure food items in dry pantry were sealed appropriately. This deficient practice could affect residents who receive meals prepared from the kitchen and served by facility staff at risk for food borne illness and cross contamination. Findings included: Observation and interviews on 04/09/24 between 9:00 a.m. and 10:30 a.m. findings revealed: Water was pooled in front of the three-compartment sink. Walk through of dry pantry showed 1-12-ounce bag of dry gravy, opened and spilling on floor. Brown grime up along the walls and under the storage shelves. Buildup of grime on equipment. Stainless steel freezer doors and handles, rolling carts, and kitchen floors were visibly dirty. The wall behind the dishwasher was covered in black grime. The freezer had 2 opened,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-11 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program so that the facility was free of pests and rodents for one of one facility reviewed. The facility failed to ensure the facility was free of rodents. This failure could place the residents at risk of unsanitary and unsafe conditions. Findings included: During a confidential group interview on 4/10/24 at 11:48 am with nine residents, it was stated that the facility changed to a new pest control company in February 2024. All nine residents agreed that the new company had done very well in getting rid of the bugs in the facility but there was still a problem with mice. All residents present for the meeting agreed that the facility continued to have a problem with mice and two of the residents stated that they each have a pet mouse that they have named in their room (they did not live in the same room) that would get on their beds and let them feed them from their hand and pet them. All residents present denied any injuries - bites, scratches - from any rodents in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the dignity right was respected for 2 of 20 residents (Resident#33 and Resident #72) reviewed for privacy and dignity. Resident #33 and Resident #72 had urinary catheter drainage bags that were not covered with privacy bags, and the urine content of the bag was visible to other residents, visitors, and facility employees. This failure placed residents at risk for violation of privacy. The findings included: Review of Resident #33's admission Record revealed he was an [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission Record documented her diagnoses included congestive heart failure (heart fails to pump), type 2 diabetes (body's inability to control blood sugars), retention of urine, prostate hypertrophy (prostate gland enlargement which causes urinary difficulty). Record review of the quarterly MDS dated [DATE] for Resident #33 indicated BIMS was 05, required extensive assistance by two persons for bed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that ensure the accurate administering of all drugs to meet the needs of the residents, for 1 of 4 medication carts reviewed for pharmacy services, in that: . The medication cart used for halls A, B and C had two insulin pens dated (03/06/24) that had expired as indicated by the manufacturer's recommendations since they were only good for 28 days after being opened. This failure could place residents at risk of receiving medications that were expired and not produce the desired effect. The findings included: During an interview and observation on 04/09/24 at 11:28 AM the medication cart for halls A, B and C was inspected with LVN A present. Inside the cart was 1 insulin pen with an open date of 3-6-24 and another one dated 3-6-24. Both pens indicated to dispose after 28 days according to manufacturer recommendations. The LVN said she had not noticed the pens had already expired or else she would have replaced them. During an interview on 04/09/24 at 11:32 AM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review , the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments and permit only authorized personnel to have access to the keys, for one medication carts (the medication cart for halls A, B and C) of four medication carts reviewed for drug storage. The facility failed to ensure medication carts were left unlocked and unsupervised on 04/09/24. These failures could place clients at risk for drug diversion or accidental ingestion. The findings included: During an observation on 04/09/24 at 11:24 AM the medication cart used for halls A, B and C was noted to be unlocked, unattended and unsupervised by staff. During an interview and observation on 04/09/24 at 11:28 AM LVN A said if the cart was left unlocked and unattended it could lead to unauthorized people having access to it or any residents getting into it. The LVN said she stepped away and forgot to lock it. The cart was inspected with LVN A present and several over the counter and prescription medications were located in the cart. During an interview on 04/09/24 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-11 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for environment. The facility failed to ensure that wastewater was not discharged onto the ground outside the main entrance into the parking lot on 04/09/24 and 04/10/24. This failure could place the residents, staff, and the public in danger of contracting illness and disease from vector borne transmission of infectious bacteria and viruses. Findings included: Observations on 04/09/24, at 2:30 pm and again on 04/10/24, at 9:30 am revealed the main entrance parking lot had grey colored water streaming from a drain clean out located at the end of A Hall. There was pile of soiled toilet tissue next to the drain clean out. The stream of grey water ran from clean out location to end parking lot, pooling in areas next to exit on A hall. Observation on 04/10/24 at 8:30 am revealed the Maintenance Director outside the building at the end of A Hall with a shovel filling in a hole at the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 4 of 8 residents (Resident #1, Resident #4, Resident #6, and Resident #7) reviewed for homelike environment. The facility failed to provide needed housekeeping and maintenance for the dining room, hallways, for Resident #1, Resident #6, and Resident #7. The facility failed to keep sound levels comfortable for Resident #4 and Resident #7. These failures could place the residents at risk of increased anxiety, unsanitary conditions, and uncomfortable conditions. Findings included: Observation on 2/9/24 at 3:58pm revealed debris, white paper, white paint spots on the floor in hallways A, B, D, F, and dining room. Observation on 2/9/24 at 4:07pm revealed debris on the floor in the dining room, pink sugar packets and white substance near two different trash cans on the floor. There were debris and dirt located behind the dining room door and in corners of the dining room.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-11 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program so that the facility was free of pests and rodents for one of one facility reviewed. The facility failed to ensure the rooms of residents and the dining room tables were free of pests and rodents. This failure could place the residents at risk of unsanitary and uncomfortable conditions. Findings included: Observation on 2/9/24 at 4:20 pm revealed three roaches on the wall of the conference room. The ADM took her shoe off and smashed roaches to the wall. Interview on 2/9/24 at 4:20pm with the ADM revealed the facility were under QAPI for the roach problem and it was an ongoing issue. The ADM revealed this had been an issue as long as she had been at the facility, and she was hired in 2019. The ADM stated she had showers fixed, was updating the building one room at a time as she is able, and she had replaced some furniture. The ADM stated she had two pest control companies coming once a week but was only able to provide documentation for one pest control company…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-03-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed in that: The facility failed to discard expired food items. The facility failed to maintain effective pest control in the kitchen. The facility's kitchen staff failed to practice proper hand hygiene. These deficient practices affected residents who received meals prepared from the kitchen and placed them at risk for food borne illness and cross-contamination. Findings include: Observation of the kitchen on 03/07/2023 at 9:45 a.m. during an inspection of the refrigerator revealed the following: 1 gallon size storage container of white pudding-like substance, not labeled, not dated. Observation of the kitchen on 03/07/2023 at 10:15 a.m. during an inspection of the pantry revealed the following: Four packages of yellow corn meal mix, 6 oz. boxes, with each box containing holes that appeared to be gnawed through the packaging. 5-pound bag of graham cracker crumbs, with holes that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-03-09 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespreadMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program so that the facility was free of pests and rodents 1 of 1 Kitchen, 1 of 1 Dining Room, Secured Unit E, Secured Unit F, room [ROOM NUMBER] and room [ROOM NUMBER]: The facility failed to ensure an effective pest control program was in place to keep cockroaches out of Dining Room and resident rooms. The facility failed to ensure an effective pest control program was in place to keep mice out of kitchen pantry. These failures could place residents at risk of potential spread of infection, cross-contamination, food-borne illness, and decreased quality of life. Findings include: Observation on 03/06/23 at 09:45 AM revealed two live cockroaches crawling on wall of Dining Room. Interview on 03/06/23 at 11:03 AM a resident stated his only complaint was he had a mouse in his room. The resident stated he told the nurses and they put a glue trap out for it for about a month but all that was caught was bugs.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-03-09 · tag F0552 — patternEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure the resident's had the right to be informed of the risks, and participate in, his or her treatment which included the right to be informed in advance, by the physician or other practitioner or professional, of the risks and benefits of proposed care, of treatment and treatment alternatives or treatment options and to choose the alternative or option he or she preferred, for 5 of 9 residents (Residents #21, #28, #37, #135, #235) reviewed for resident rights . Resident #21 had no consent for the antipsychotic medication dextromorphan-quinidine. Resident #28 had no consent for the antianxiety medication buspirone, antidepressant medication duloxetine, the antipsychotic medication olanzapine, or the antidepressant medication trazodone. Resident #37 had no consent for the antidepressant medication Sertraline or the antianxiety medication Buspirone. Resident #135 had no consent for the antidepressant medication Duloxetine and the antidepressant…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-03-09 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure residents received services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of each resident's needs for 12 of 29 (Residents #5, #16, #18, #21, #23, #24, #25, #32, #39, #44, #65, #68) resident rooms reviewed for call lights. Residents call lights were on the floor, behind furniture, or coiled on the wall unit, out of reach while residents were in their room. This deficient practice could affect residents who need assistance with activities of daily living of not having needs met. Findings Include: Observation made on 3/6/23 beginning at 10:51 a.m. revealed Resident #65's call light cord was on the floor out of reach of the resident. The resident sat on her bed. Observation on 03/06/23 at 3:15 PM revealed in Resident #9 there was no place to tie string to the switch (they would be unable to use call light). The resident was in her bathroom. The resident was capable of using the call light physically and mentally. Observation on 03/06/23 at 3:23 PM revealed in Resident #32 the call light was out of reach while the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 2 of 2 resident observed for mechanical transfers (Resident #38 and #68). CNA L and CNA M did not lock Resident #68's wheelchair prior to completing a mechanical lift transfer CNA N and CNA O did not lock Resident #38's wheelchair prior to transfer and did not correctly compete a two-person transfer. These failures could place residents who required two-person assistance during transfers at risk for injuries. Findings included: Review of Resident #68's admission Record dated 3/8/23 revealed she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included cerebral palsy, muscle wasting and atrophy, muscle weakness, history of falls, and difficulty in walking. Review of Resident #68's Annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed: She scored an 11 of 15 on her mental status exam (indicating she was moderately…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of residents in 1 of 1 medication rooms reviewed for storage in that: 1. 6 boxes Acetaminophen Suppositories, containing 12 Rectal suppositories, 650 mg each with the expiration date of 01/2023. 2. One box of 10SG Urinalysis Reagent Strips, Quantity of 100, with the expiration date of 10/14/2022. 3. Two 5 oz (148 mL) bottles of Safe n Simple Ostomy Skin Barrier Powder Lot # 190312 with the expiration date of 03/12/2022. 4. One ready to use, with tubing attached (spiked ) IV bag on the countertop with no labeling. These failure could place residents at risk of receiving medications that were expired and not produce the desired effect. Findings included: Observations of 1 of 1 medication storage rooms on 03/07/2023 at 10:36 AM revealed the following medications were found to be expired: *6 boxes Acetaminophen Suppositories, containing 12…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored in permanently affixed compartments during medication storage inspection for 2 of 2 medication carts reviewed for storage in that: The facility failed to ensure that all medications were properly stored in 2 of 2 medication carts. This failure could result in a drug diversion. Findings included: Observation on 03/07/23 at 09:36 AM with MA-J of medication cart for #1 of 2, revealed and identified loose pills revealed as: 1. .5 trazadone 2. 1 thyroid med 3. 1 Topiramate 50 mg During observation on 03/07/2023 at 10:10 of MA-K, med cart # 1 loose pills revealed as: 1. 1 metopilol 2. 1 namenda 10 mg 3. 2 dextro amphetamine 4. 1 mirtrapine 5. 1 cyclobenzaprine 6. 1 lisionopril 20 mg 7. .5 amlodapine 8. 1 baclofen 9. 1 levothyroxine 10. 1 namenta 5 mg 11. 1 propanolol During an interview on 03/07/23 at 09:36 AM, the MA-J stated she tried to keep cart #1 clean at all times. During an interview 03/07/2023 at 10:20 AM the MA-K stated she cleaned cart #2 every day with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-03-09 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — patternSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that the quality assessment and assurance committee developed and implemented appropriate plans of actions to correct identified quality deficiencies for the memory care units on halls 2 of 2 halls whose environment was reviewed in that: The QAPI committee, which included the Administrator, DON, Medical Director, and the Clinical Reimbursement Director, did not identify quality deficient practices regarding Resident Room #'s 49, 50, 51, 53, 54, 56, 42, and 46 where the physical environment had not improved from past noncompliance. These deficient practices could affect the residents who were observed on the Memory Care Units, (Halls E/F). Findings Include: During observation on 03/06/2023 at 9:44 AM -10:45 AM Hall F revealed: Resident RM [ROOM NUMBER] A/B, there were missing floor tiles, broken blinds, cracked window seal, and drywall needed painting, a hole approximately 3x3 was in the closet door with no hanger in closet. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-03-09 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain all mechanical, electrical, and patient care equipment, in safe operating condition, for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for essential equipment. The facility's dishwasher was leaking and the kitchen floor drain was clogged causing 1 inch of contaminated water on floor from dishwasher and floor drain contaminants . This failure could place residents at risk of being exposed to slips and falls from 1 inch of standing water in kitchen and exposure to contaminated water and contaminated residual from dishwater overflow from drain. Findings include: Observations and interview of the facility's only kitchen on 03/06/23 09:45 a.m. and 11:45 a.m. revealed there was 1 inch of water pooled on the floor of the entire kitchen. Maintenance was vacuuming up the water with a shop vac. DM A stated the dishwasher leaked a lot and the Food Service Manager B attempted to fix it every time it leaked. Per the Food Service Manager B, the drain gets clogged and that caused the water to pool on the floor. Observation and interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-03-09 · tag F0914 — patternProvide bedrooms that don't allow residents to see each other when privacy is needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure resident rooms were designed or equipped to assure full visual privacy for each occupied resident room for 17 rooms (Rooms 1, 2, 6, 7, 12, 13, 14, 16, 17, 18, 20, 21, 23, 24, 26 here) of 48 rooms observed, in that: a). Semi-Private rooms did not provide full visual privacy (Rooms 1, 2, 6, 7, 12, 14, 17, 20, 21, 23 and 26). b). Rooms did not have curtains at all (rooms [ROOM NUMBER]). c). Rooms did not have blinds or curtains exposing the resident near the window (Rooms 16, 20, 23). These failure could affect residents by placing them at risk for loss of privacy and dignity. The findings include: Observation on 03/06/23 at 03:28 PM revealed room [ROOM NUMBER] A (Resident #9) had no curtain. Observation on 03/07/23 at 09:36 AM revealed the resident in room [ROOM NUMBER] (Resident #68) was transferred to the bedside commode. The aides helping the resident pulled the curtain in front of the door but when the resident in 6 B came in the aides were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-09 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff and the public for 37 of 48 rooms and 37 residents (#1, 5, 7, 8, 9, 11, 17, 18, 19, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 28, 32, 37, 38, 39, 40, 42, 44, 45, 47, 51, 52, 54, 55, 65, 66, 68, 70, 73, 75, 79, 235 & 236) reviewed for physical environment. Resident rooms and other areas accessible to the residents had drywall damage, missing baseboards, damaged ceilings and restrooms in need of repair or had furniture that was not in good repair or worn to the point of not being sanitizable. The main dining room's furniture was worn, in unsafe condition, and not-santizable. The lobby area's furniture was worn to threads. Hall A resident rooms had dry wall damage, missing baseboards, ceilings with water damage, restrooms in need of repair or had furniture that was not in good repair and/or were worn to the point of not being sanitizable. Hall B resident rooms had dry wall…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-09 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive assessments were completed within 14 calendar days after admission as required for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #235) reviewed for admission assessments. Resident #235 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and did not have a completed admission/comprehensive MDS assessment within 14 days following admission to the facility. This failure could result in newly admitted residents not receiving the proper care required to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. The findings included: Review of Resident #235's Electronic admission Record dated 3/8/23 revealed she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included alcohol dependence with alcohol-induced persisting dementia, Wernicke's Encephalopathy (a degenerative brain disorder caused by the lack of vitamin B1 that may result from alcohol abuse), major depressive disorder, psychotic disorder with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for each resident that included measurable objectives and time frames to meet, attain, and/or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #28) reviewed for care plans in that: Resident #28 did not have a care plan in place to address her diagnoses of dementia, fibromyalgia, or pain management. This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk of not receiving individualized care and services to meet their needs. The findings include: Review of Resident #28's Electronic admission Record dated 3/8/23 revealed she was a [AGE] year-old female originally admitted to the facility 12/14/22 with a most recent admission date of 1/9/23. She had diagnoses which included Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, dementia with behavioral disturbance, hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol), hypokalemia (low potassium), major depressive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2025-12-12 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY An incident investigation (Intake#1029204, 1030702, 1035046, 1046030, 1046503, 1054016) was conducted on 12/12/25. The census was 78.Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for environmental concerns. The facility failed on 12/10/2025 when Hall B had Residents rooms and hallways that was upswept with food particles and trash on the floors throughout the building, broken window blinds was in resident's rooms, and there was broken floor tiles in resident's rooms. These failures could affect the residents and placed them at risk of living in an unsafe and uncomfortable environment. Findings included: Observation on 12/10/25 at 9:25 AM to 9:40 AM revealed Hall B- floors covered in trash, food particles, trash candy wrappers lying between handrail and wall.At 9:30AM Hall B, room [ROOM NUMBER], brown dry stain (coffee or tea) on floor, trashcan overflowing, trash on floor and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2025-08-02 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — patternDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to dispose of garbage and refuse properly for 2 of 3 dumpsters in that: The facility failed to ensure the dumpster lids were closed on 2 of 3 dumpsters and the area surrounding the dumpsters were free of garbage and debris.These failures could affect residents who resided in the facility and the public by placing them at risk of exposure to germs, disease, and an environment which could attract pests and rodents. The findings include: In an observation on 8/2/25 at 6:00 PM of 2 of 3 dumpsters located outside the nursing facility, the lids were open on both dumpsters. The dumpsters were not full. A trash bag with trash inside was hanging over the trash can. There was trash outside the dumpster including a toilet and some wooden items. During an interview on 8/2/25 at 6:10 PM, the Administrator stated the expectation is dumpster lids were to always remain closed and area free of trash or debris. The maintenance director does rounds outside the facility on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. No policy on garbage and refuse disposal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-07-15 · tag F0575 — widespreadPost a list of names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all pertinent State agencies and advocacy groups and a statement that the resident may file a complaint with the State Survey Agency.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to post in a form and manner accessible and understandable to residents and resident representatives a list of names, addresses (mailing and email, and telephone numbers of all pertinent State agencies and advocacy groups, such as the State Survey Agency, the State licensure office, the protection and advocacy network, home and community based service programs, and the Medicaid Fraud Control Unit for 1 of 1 buildings reviewed for postings The facility failed to ensure the number to HHS Long Term Care Regulatory (state survey and certification agency) number for filing grievances, or complaints or suspected violations of state or Federal violations was posted. This failure could place residents at risk of lack of knowledge of who to contact should they require advocacy, investigation, and not knowing their rights, how to exercise their rights, or investigations into violations of their rights. Findings include: Observation and interview on 7/10/24 at 12:30 p.m., the ADON stated she knew what to do monitor for abuse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$9,281 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $9,281 — penalty dated 2025-05-06
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to FOCUSED POST ACUTE CARE PARTNERS — 25 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 1.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.1 | -0.1 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 1.2 | +0.8 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 4.0 | -2.0 vs chain |
The other 24 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.9★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| BOWERMAN, STEPHEN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 01/01/2023 |
| CHAPLIN, CARI | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | since 11/01/2017 |
| FLORES, THOMAS | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | since 05/01/2023 |
| GOLDAPP, SHANNON | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | since 11/01/2024 |
| GREENE, TRACIE | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | since 04/01/2017 |
| GRIMES, DAVID | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | since 04/01/2017 |
| MCKENZIE, MARK | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2017 |
| FOCUSED POST | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/24/2025 |
| FOCUSED POST ACUTE CARE PARTNERS II LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/22/2025 |
| FOCUSED POST ACUTE CARE PARTNERS LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 11/01/2017 |
| FOCUSED POST ACUTE CARE PARTNERS MANAGEMENT, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/24/2025 |
| FPACP MIDLAND | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/24/2025 |
| MIDLAND COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 04/01/2017 |
| CONLEY, SHAWN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2017 |
| HUGHETT, KIMBERLEE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/26/2019 |
| MILSTEAD, SAMANTHA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/27/2022 |
| STRUBBE, LORETTA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2017 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 28 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 89% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $303K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in TX
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 675985. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-19, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.