No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Focused Care of Gilmer

623 Hwy 155N, Gilmer, TX 75644 · For profit - Corporation · 112 certified beds · (903) 797-2143 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0600, F0602) — most recent Jun 20262 immediate-jeopardy citations$15,288 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Jun 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (48) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $15,288 in federal fines (most recent 2026-04-08)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
703 Titus St · (903) 843-5529 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Med-Shop Pharmacy · (903) 680-2600 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
102 Loch St · (903) 843-2252 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1001 W Tyler St · (903) 843-3136

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased17.1%15.8%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.7%3.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.3%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.9%0.8%2.0%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms2.0%2.4%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.5%3.3%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened6.9%14.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication23.8%18.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.2%3.8%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control5.2%13.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table13.9%9.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.9%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine92.6%88.0%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission20.3%25.7%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit14.2%12.3%12.0%worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

51.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 39 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

51.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.34U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.14hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.17hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.34 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 58% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF51.1%CMS range 37.6–65.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.4%CMS range 6.9–15.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay4.8%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.1%CMS range 4.4–16.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.811.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.30
RN hours/ resident / day
0.87
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.86
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.03
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.26
RN hoursweekends
51.0%
Total nursing turnover
33.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 112 beds and averages 63.7 residents a day — about 57% occupied, or roughly 48 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.03 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.30 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.86 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.51 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.24 on weekdays — 23% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.31 to 0.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

11
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-02-25)
8
at the previous standard inspection (2024-12-04)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

48 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 36 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-04-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for quality of care. 1. The facility failed to ensure RN A assessed Resident #1's vital signs and neurological status after his fall on 03/23/26. Vital signs were not checked until the next morning when the family requested the Resident to be sent to the emergency room. Resident #1 took Eliquis (anticoagulant medication). 2. The facility failed to obtain, review, and follow-up on Resident #1's hospital records after his return from the emergency room on [DATE]. These hospital records were not obtained until surveyor intervention. These failures resulted in the identification of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 04/07/26 at 10:18AM. While the IJ was removed on 04/07/26 at 04:07PM, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-04-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible, and each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents and hazards in that: 1. On 03/23/26, the facility failed to ensure that Resident #1 did not lay on the floor for approximately 2 hours and 20 minutes after falling out of bed. 2. The facility failed to ensure that RN A, LVN B, and CNA C appropriately transferred Resident #1 back to bed post fall. 3. The facility failed to ensure that RN A and CNA C monitored Resident #1 every 2 hours. These failures resulted in the identification of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 04/07/26 at 10:18AM. While the IJ was removed on 04/07/26 at 04:07PM, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and a severity level of no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy due to the facility's need to evaluate the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-06-18 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient number of nursing staff on a 24-hour basis to provide nursing care to all residents in accordance with resident care plans and the facility assessment for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for care and services. The facility failed to provide sufficient CNAs according to the facility assessment on 05/18/2026, 05/21/2026, 05/22/2026, 05/23/2026, 05/24/2026, 05/30/2026, 05/31/2026, 06/06/2026, 06/09/2026, 06/13/2026, 06/14/2026, 06/15/2026 This failure placed residents at risk of inadequate supervision, an unsafe environment, falls, serious harm and injury, exacerbations of disease processes, and a decreased quality of life.Findings included: During an interview on 06/16/2026 at 12:30 PM, Resident #6 said it took the staff a long time to answer the call lights, and sometimes he had to call the nurses' station on the phone to have them provide incontinent care. Resident #6 said in the past he had waited for his call light to be answered or to be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 3 of 3 residents (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #4) reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure CNA B and CNA D followed enhanced barrier precautions when providing care to Resident #1 on 06/16/2026. The facility failed to ensure the ADON and the Treatment Nurse provided proper wound care to Resident #1 on 06/16/2026. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 had proper signage to indicate he required the use of contact precautions. The facility failed to ensure RN F followed contact precautions when providing wound care to Resident #2 on 06/13/2026. The facility failed to ensure LVN N followed enhanced barrier precautions when providing care to Resident #4 on 06/16/2026. These failures could place…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-18 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — pattern
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to be adequately equipped to allow residents to call for staff assistance through a communication system which relays the call directly to a staff member or to a centralized staff work area from each resident's bedside, for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for call lights. The facility failed to ensure the call light system was functioning properly. This failure could place residents at risk of injury, falls, and unmet needs.The findings included: During an interview on 06/16/2026 at 2:02 PM, Resident #3 said it was taking a long time for the staff to answer the call light. She said she had reported it to the nurses and they told her they were short. During an interview on 06/16/2026 at 7:22 PM, LVN P said some of the residents reported to her that the call lights were not being answered in a timely manner. She said they were having issues with the call lights because if 4 or more call lights went off on the 100 hall the call light system stopped working and all the call lights turned off. She said when they realized it…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-06-18 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program to keep the facility free from pests in 3 of 3 halls reviewed for pest control. The facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to ensure the facility was free of flies. This failure could place residents at risk for an unsanitary environment and a decreased quality of life. Findings included: During a walk through the facility on 06/16/2026 starting at 11:41 AM, there were multiple flies observed on halls 100, 200, and 300. During an observation and interview on 06/17/2026 at 9:15 AM, there were multiple flies in Resident #1's room. He was observed shaking his head trying to get them away. He said this had been an ongoing issue but was not able to provide a timeframe. During an interview on 06/17/2026 at 6:16 PM, the ADON said the residents complained to her about the flies in the facility and in their rooms, and she had reported it to the previous maintenance director. She said she could not remember how long ago it had been. The ADON said it was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-18 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for resident neglect. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 was given lunch and dinner on 06/13/2026. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 was provided with incontinent care and turning and repositioning every 2 hours on 06/13/2026. These failures could result in pressure injuries, weight loss, infections, psychosocial harm, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #2's face sheet dated 06/17/2026, indicated he was an [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dementia mild without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety (loss of memory, language, problem solving and other thinking abilities that were severe enough to interfere with daily life without any behaviors or disturbances), atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living receives the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for ADLs. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3 received bathing as scheduled for the months of May 2026 and June 2026. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving needed services and care, decreased self-esteem, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #3's face sheet dated 06/18/2026 indicated she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (chronic inflammatory lung disease that causes obstructed airflow from the lungs) and muscle weakness. Record review of Resident #3's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated she understood others and others usually understood her. Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident, the residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices for 1 of 3 (Resident #1) residents reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to ensure a skin assessment was conducted on Resident #1 after CNA B observed a new open wound on his front perineal area on 06/17/2026. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving appropriate care and treatment, a decreased quality of life, and worsening pressure ulcers. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 06/18/2026 indicated he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included quadriplegia (paralysis of the arms, trunk, and legs resulting from damage to the brain and/or spinal cord), neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder (problems due to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as was possible and each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents. The facility failed to ensure CNA B and CNA D performed a proper transfer with the mechanical lift when they caused Resident #1's wheelchair to tip backward and failed to guide the bar of the mechanical lift so it would not make contact with Resident #1's head on 06/17/2026. This failure could place residents at an increased risk of falls and injuries. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 06/18/2026 indicated he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included quadriplegia (paralysis of the arms, trunk, and legs resulting from damage to the brain and/or spinal cord), neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder (problems due to disease or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-18 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for indwelling urinary catheters. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's urinary catheter was secured to his leg on 06/17/2026. This failure could place residents at risk for damage to the bladder, penis, or urethra (a hollow tube that lets urine leave your body), dislodging of the catheter, and urinary tract infections. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 06/18/2026 indicated he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included quadriplegia (paralysis of the arms, trunk, and legs resulting from damage to the brain and/or spinal cord), neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder (problems due to disease or injury of the central nervous system or nerves involved in the control of urination), and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that all drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled and stored in accordance with professional standards for 2 of 2 medication carts (100/300/400 Hall Medication Cart and the 200 Hall Medication Cart) reviewed for drugs and biologicals. The facility failed to ensure LVN O secured the 100/300/400 Hall Medication Cart and the 200 Hall Medication Cart, when they were not in use on 06/17/2026. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving drugs and biologicals as needed, medication errors, medication misuse, and drug diversion. Findings included: During an observation on 06/17/2026 starting at 6:34 PM, the 200 Hall Medication Cart was observed unlocked and unattended stationed against the wall leading to the kitchen. LVN O was observed standing in front of the 100/300/400 Hall Medication Cart with her back to the 200 Hall Medication Cart on her computer. LVN O walked down the hall and went into a room. LVN O left the 100/300/400 Hall Medication Cart unlocked. Staff and residents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 36 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-25 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — pattern
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide care and services in accordance with activities of daily living for hygiene-bathing, dressing, grooming, and oral care for residents a during a confidential interview for 13 of 13 residents (Unidentified Resident #1, Unidentified Resident #2, Unidentified Resident #3, Unidentified Resident #4, Unidentified Resident #5, Unidentified Resident #6, Unidentified Resident #7, Unidentified Resident #8, Unidentified Resident #9, Unidentified Resident #10, Unidentified Resident #11, Unidentified Resident #12, Unidentified Resident #13)reviewed for ADLs. The facility failed to ensure the residents had a sufficient number of towels in the facility for ADL care. This failure could place residents at risk of no showers, hand hygiene, not receiving services/care and decreased quality of life. Findings include:A record review of the facility in-service binder, no in-services were noted related to the facility not having towels available for the resident's hygiene needs. A record review of the facility invoice…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents who need respiratory care were provided with such care, consistent with professional standards of practices for 3 of 25 residents (Resident #14, Resident #35, and Resident #2) reviewed for respiratory care.The facility failed to ensure that oxygen filters were clean for Resident #14's oxygen concentrator.The facility failed to change the oxygen tubing for Resident #35's oxygen concentrator.The facility failed to ensure Resident #2's oxygen reservoir was changed weekly.These failures could place residents who receive respiratory care at risk of developing respiratory complications and a decreased quality of care.1. Record review of Resident #14's face sheet, dated 01/02/26 revealed a [AGE] year-old female originally admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Chronic Obtrusive Pulmonary Disease (a progressive, irreversible lung disease causing chronic, long-term breathing problems,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments for 3 of 23 residents reviewed for storage of drugs and biologicals (Resident #9, Resident #32, and Resident #30) and 2 of 4 medication carts (Medication Cart #2 and Treatment Cart #4) reviewed for medication storage. The facility failed to securely store wound care chemicals for Resident #9.The facility failed to securely store fluticasone propionate nasal spray 50 micro grams (a corticosteroid used to relieve seasonal and year-round allergy symptoms, including nasal congestion, runny nose, itchy nose, sneezing, and watery eyes), fluticasone propionate and Salmeterol powder 250/50 micrograms (a combination prescription inhaler containing a corticosteroid and a long-acting beta-agonist), and povidone-iodine 10% solution (a fast-acting, broad-spectrum topical antiseptic used to prevent infections in minor cuts, scrapes, and burns, as well as for preoperative skin preparation) for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation in that:1. The facility failed to dispose of expired prepackaged green onions that were actively decomposing.2. The facility failed to label and date bread, butter, and baked items.These deficient practices could place residents who received meals from the kitchen at risk for food borne illness.The findings were:During an observation of the kitchen on 2/22/26 at 10:01 a.m. it was observed that bread was not dated or labeled sitting on top of a toaster. Bags of green onion were expired, dated 1/17/2026, and unlabeled. [NAME] onions were decomposing inside of the bag releasing black liquid. Blocks of margarine were undated and labeled with no expiration date listed on the packaging.During an interview on 2/25/26 at 9:13 a.m. with the Dietary Manager she stated that food should be labeled and dated. She said that food should be covered properly. She…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-25 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences except when to do so would endanger the health or safety of the resident or other residents for 3 of 16 residents (Resident # 17, Resident #52, and Resident #69) reviewed for resident rights.1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #17 was able to access her bedroom furnishings.2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #69 was able to access her call light.This failure could place residents at risk for unmet needs and decreased quality of life.Findings include:1. Record review of Resident #17's face sheet, dated 08/21/25, reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #17 had diagnoses which included Paraplegia (impairment or loss of motor and sensory function in the lower extremities and sometimes the torso, resulting from spinal cord damage in the thoracic,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-25 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident had the right to be free from misappropriation of property and exploitation for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for misappropriation of property. The facility failed to prevent the misappropriation of Resident #3's Hydrocodone (Norco) (a combination medicine that is commonly taken for severe pain). This failure could place residents at risk for uncontrolled pain. Record review of Resident #3's face sheet, dated 2/24/2026, indicated Resident #3 was an [AGE] year-old male who was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #3 had diagnoses which included chronic venous hypertension with ulcers to bilateral lower extremities (occurs when veins in the lower extremities fail to efficiently return blood to the heart ), Sepsis (a life-threatening condition caused by the body's extreme response to an infection), diabetes mellitus (a condition in which the body has trouble controlling blood sugar and using it for energy), and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that included medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #35) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to implement the comprehensive person-centered care plan for Resident #35 by not documenting resident's need for oxygen therapy. This failure could place residents at risk of not having individual needs met, a decreased quality of life, and cause residents not to receive needed services Findings include:Record review of Resident #35's face sheet, dated 12/28/24, reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #35 had diagnoses which included Acute and Chronic Respiratory Failure with Hypercapnia (occurs when a patient with underlying chronic respiratory insufficiency suffers a sudden, severe decline in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-25 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with pressure ulcers receives necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #16 and Resident 64) reviewed for skin integrity. The facility failed to ensure Resident #16 and Resident 64's pressure- redistribution mattress (is designed to distribute the patient's body weight over a broad surface area and help prevent skin breakdown) was on the correct settings. This failure could place residents at risk for developing pressure ulcers and could contribute to developing avoidable pressure ulcers. Findings include: 1.Record review of Resident #16's face sheet, dated 2/24/26, indicated a [AGE] year-old male initially admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #16 had diagnoses which included cellulitis of buttocks (a bacterial infection of the deep skin layers), morbid (serve)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who had an indwelling catheter with a drainage bag had a securing device for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #18) reviewed for catheter care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #18's indwelling foley catheter (drains urine from your urinary bladder into a bag outside your body) had a catheter securement device to anchor the catheter to her leg. This failure could place residents at risk for friction, pulling, pain and trauma.Findings included: Record review of Resident #18's face sheet dated 2/23/26 reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was initially admitted on [DATE] and was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #18 had diagnoses which included: neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder (the loss of normal bladder control due to nerve damage), retention of urine (the inability to fully empty the bladder) and need for assistance with personal care. Record review of Resident #18's MDS assessment, dated 2/20/26,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 of 16 residents (Resident #18 and Resident #36) reviewed for infection control practices. 1. The facility failed to ensure CNA B removed her gown when she entered the hallway to get gloves while providing incontinent care and catheter care for Resident #18 on enhanced barrier precautions on 2/22/26. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #36's feeding tubing port was capped and off the floor. These failures could place residents at risk for cross contamination and the spread of infection. Findings include: Record review of Resident #18's face sheet dated 2/23/26 reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was initially admitted on [DATE] and was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #18 had diagnoses which included:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents could call for staff assistance through a communication system which relays the call directly to a staff member or to a centralized staff work area from each resident's bedside for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #52) reviewed for resident call system. The facility failed to ensure Resident #52 had a call light button attached to the call light system. Resident #52 did not have a call light available from 2/22/26 until 2/24/26. This failure could place residents at risk for a delay in assistance and decreased quality of life, self-worth, and dignity. Findings include: Record review of Resident #52's face sheet, dated 2/23/26, reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #52 had diagnoses which included: chronic systolic (congestive) heart failure ( where the left ventricle weakens and cannot pump enough blood), chronic gout due to renal impairment (high…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-01 · tag F0774 — isolated
    Help the resident with transportation to and from laboratory services outside of the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide normal transportation for residents to medical services outside of the facility for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for transportation. The facility failed to provide transportation for Resident #1 to a doctor's appointment on 10/14/25. This failure could place residents at risk of possible adequate evaluation, hospitalization and unmet needs.Findings include: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 10/28/25, reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included: paraplegia (a condition characterized by the loss or impairment of motor sensory functions in both lower limbs), gastro-esophageal reflux disease (a condition where stomach contents flow back up into the esophagus, causing irritation and various symptoms) and flatulence (the release of gas from the digestive tract through the anus). Record review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], reflected…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-25 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, and comfortable homelike environment for 1 of 11 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for the physical environment. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3's room was clean and free of strong urine odors. This failure could place residents at risk for a decreased quality of life and an unsanitary environment. The findings included: Record review of the face sheet, dated 11/25/25, reflected Resident #3 was a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of hypertensive heart disease with heart failure (long-term condition caused by high-blood pressure, which resulted in heart failure), paraplegia (weakness or paralysis of the lower legs), and spinal stenosis (narrowing of the spinal canal). Record review of the quarterly MDS assessment, dated 9/18/25, reflected Resident #3 had clear speech, was understood by others, and was usually able to understand others. Resident #3 had a BIMS score of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-25 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who is incontinent of bladder receives appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and to restore continence to the extent possible for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) reviewed for incontinent care. 1.The facility failed to ensure CNA A changed gloves and performed proper hand hygiene before going from dirty to clean during Resident #1's catheter and incontinent care on 11/25/25. 2. The facility failed to ensure CNA B performed hand hygiene before applying new gloves and changed gloves before going from dirty to clean during Resident #2's incontinent care on 11/25/25. These deficient practices could place residents at risk for decreased quality of life, infection, and skin breakdown due to improper care practices. The findings included: 1.Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, indicated she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment, and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for infection control practices (Resident # 7). 1.The facility failed to ensure CNA A and CNA B wore personal protective equipment while providing incontinent care for Resident #7 who was on EBP with a Foley catheter (a thin, flexible tube inserted through the urethra into the blader to facilitate urine drainage), Gastrostomy tube (is a feeding tube that delivers nutrition to your stomach) and a wound on 11/1/2025. These failures could place residents at risk of exposure to communicable diseases, cross-contamination, and infections. Findings included:Record review of the face sheet dated 11/7/2025 indicated Resident #7 was a [AGE] year old male who was re-admitted on [DATE] with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-04 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assured the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 3 of 5 residents (Resident #1, Resident #41 and Resident #206) reviewed for pharmaceutical services. The facility failed to ensure Physician Ordered medications were ordered and available for administration for each of the 3 residents (Resident #1, Resident #41 and Resident #206). 1. MA E did not administer Resident #1's Pepcid (used to treat gastroesophageal reflux) 20 milligrams medication during a medication pass on 12/03/2024 as ordered by the physician on 06/24/2022. 2. MA E did not administer Resident #41's Pepcid (used to treat gastroesophageal reflux) 20 milligrams medication during a medication pass on 12/03/2024 as ordered by the physician on 09/30/2024. 3. MA E did not administer Resident #206's Pepcid (used to treat…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-04 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the medication error rates were not 5 percent or greater. The facility had a medication error rate of 15.22%, based on 7 errors out of 46 opportunities, which involved 4 of 5 (Resident #1, Resident #17, Resident #41 and Resident #206) residents and 1 of 1 medication aide (MA E) and 1 of 1 LVN reviewed for medication errors. 1. MA E did not administer Resident #1's Pepcid during the medication pass as ordered by the physician on 12/3/24 due to medication not available. 2. MA E failed to administer the correct dose of vitamin C to Resident #17 on 12/03/2024 as ordered by the physician and mixing a medications and protein supplement (polypharmacy) together instead of preparing them individually. 3. MA E did not administer Resident #41's Pepcid during the medication pass as ordered by the physician on 12/3/24 due to medication not available. 4. MA E did not administer Resident #206's Pepcid or Paxil during the medication pass as ordered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation. 1. The facility failed to ensure food stored in the kitchen refrigerator was labeled, dated and not expired. 2. The facility failed to ensure food stored in the kitchen dry storage area was not expired. These failures could place residents at risk for foodborne illness. Findings include: During an observation on 12/02/2024 at 09:25 AM, revealed the #2 refrigerator contained a clear plastic bag of black olives with an opened date of 11/13/24 that was 1/3 full and a tray of what appeared to be 2 heads of lettuce covered with a clear plastic wrap that was not labeled or dated. During an observation on 12/02/2024 at 09:25 AM of the dry storage area revealed a clear plastic bag of [NAME] cracker crumbs, 5-pound bag that was approximately 1/3 full with an open date of 9/23/24 and a use by date of 10/23/24, 10 packages of flour tortillas 12 count package with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-04 · tag F0813 — pattern
    Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors to ensure safe and sanitary storage, handling, and consumption for three of twelve Residents (Resident #21, Resident #42 and Resident #23) reviewed for food and nutrition services. 1. The facility failed to ensure the refrigerator for Resident #21 was clean and contained food items that were labeled and dated. 2. The facility failed to ensure the refrigerator for Resident #42 did not contain expired broccoli cheddar soup. 3. The facility failed to ensure the refrigerator for Resident #23 did not contain expired peaches and pears. These failures could place residents at risk for foodborne illness. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #21's face sheet, dated 12/04/2024, revealed a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #21 had diagnoses which included: chronic systolic heart failure (the heart does not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 4 of 7 residents (Resident #1, #17, #41, and #206) and 3 of 5 staff (MA E, CNA C, and CNA D) reviewed for infection control. 1. CNA C and CNA D failed to change gloves and perform hand hygiene during incontinent care for Resident #17 on 12/02/2024. 2. MA E failed to sanitize her hands while administering medications to Resident # 1, Resident #17, Resident #41 and Resident #206 on 12/03/24. 3. MA E failed to clean and disinfect the blood pressure cuff used on Resident #17 and Resident #41 after use during medication pass on 12/3/2024. These failures could place residents at risk of exposure to infectious diseases. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #17's admission Record, dated 12/3/2024, indicated a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good, nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene for 1 of 12 residents (Residents #30) reviewed for activities of daily living. The facility failed to ensure Resident #30 received nail care. This failure could place residents at risk of not having their needs met which could result in poor care, risk for skin breakdown, feelings of poor self-esteem, lack of dignity and health. Findings include: Record review of Resident #30's facility face sheet, dated 12/03/2024, revealed an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #30 had a diagnosis which included atherosclerotic heart disease (buildup of plaque in the heart arteries). Record review of Resident #30's comprehensive care plan, dated 11/18/24, revealed Resident #30 had an ADL (activities of daily living) self-care performance deficit…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-04 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to be adequately equipped to allow residents to call for staff through a communication system which relayed the call directly to a staff member or to a centralized staff work area from toilet and bathing facilities for 2 of 18 residents (Residents #107 and #110) reviewed for call lights . The facility failed to ensure Residents #107 and #110's bathrooms had a call light pull cord on 12/02/2024 and 12/03/2024. This failure could place residents at risk of injury, pain, hospitalization, and a diminished quality of life. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #107's facility face sheet, dated 12/04/2024, revealed an [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #107 had a diagnosis which included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction (paralysis and weakness following a stroke). Record review of Resident #107's comprehensive care plan, dated 11/25/2024, revealed Resident#107 was high risk for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-04 · tag F0944 — isolated
    Conduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure as part of its QAPI program mandatory training that outlines and informs staff of the elements and goals of the facility's QAPI program for 2 of 15 employees (CNA G and CNA L) reviewed for training. The facility failed to ensure the quality assurance and performance improvement training was provided to CNA G and CNA L. This failure could place residents at risk for not being aware of facility programs, implementation, and monitoring. Findings include: Record review of CNA G's personnel file revealed CNA G was hired on 7/13/2017 and had not completed annual QAPI training . Record review of CNA L's personnel file revealed CNA L was hired on 2/06/2024 and had not completed QAPI training. During an interview on 12/05/2024 at 2:30 PM, the ADON said she was responsible for overseeing the on hire and annual trainings and was not aware of the required annual QAPI training not being completed for CNA G and CNA L. She stated she used a binder to manually record and keep track of required training. She said if staff were not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation for 2 of 9 residents (Resident #'s 1 and #2) reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to ensure CNA G did not verbally and physically abuse Resident #1 during incontinent care. The facility failed to ensure CNA G did not verbally and physically abuse Resident #2 during incontinent care. This failure could place residents at risk of abuse, humiliation, intimidation, fear, mental distress, depression, and decreased quality of life. Findings included: 1.Record review of the undated face sheet revealed Resident #1, a [AGE] year-old female, was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. The face sheet revealed she had diagnoses that included: Nondisplaced fracture of coracoid process, left shoulder (broken shoulder), Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (irregular and rapid heart rhythm), hypertension (pressure in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food under sanitary conditions in 1 of 1 preparation kitchen. * The facility failed to ensure baking sheets did not have brown and/or black baked on build up and stacked together. * The facility failed to ensure muffin pans did not have brown baked on build up and stacked together. * The facility failed to ensure a scoop was not left in the bulk corn meal. * The facility failed to ensure the ice machine did not have a pink slimy substance in the drop chute. This failure could place residents who ate food from the kitchen at risk of foodborne illness. Findings included: During observations and interviews on 11/13/23, the following was noted in the kitchen: *at 08:35 a.m., on a storage shelf there were 3 small baking sheets with brown and/or black baked on residue were stacked together, 6 large baking sheets with brown and/or black baked on residue were stacked together, and 5 muffin pans with brown baked on residue were stacked together. The DM said she had difficulty…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-11-15 · tag F0851 — widespread
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, including information for agency and contract staff, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data in a uniform format according to specifications established by CMS fiscal year 2023 for 2 of 4 quarters reviewed for payroll data information. (Quarter 1 and Quarter 4) The facility failed to submit accurate staffing information to CMS for the 1st and 4th quarter of the fiscal year 2023. This failure could place residents at risk for personal needs not being identified and met, decreased quality of care, decline in health status, and decreased feelings of well-being within their living environment. Findings included: Record Review of the facility's Civil Rights form (3761) dated 11/13/23 indicated the following: -6 RNs -9 LVNs -23 Direct Care Staff -6 Dietary -4 Housekeeping & Laundry -8 All Others Record review of the CMS PBJ Staffing Data Report (payroll-based staffing), CASPER Report (Certification and Survey Provider Enhanced Report)1705 D FY…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for 2 of 10 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans. (Residents #6 and #42) The facility did not develop a care plan for Resident #6 addressing his smoking, behaviors, resistance to care, or his full code status upon readmission. The facility did not develop a care plan for Resident #42 addressing his bipolar disorder diagnosis, Factor 5 Leiden mutation diagnosis, or anticoagulant medication upon admission. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the appropriate care and services to maintain their highest level of well-being. Findings included: 1. Record review of a face sheet dated 10/23/23 indicated Resident #6 was an [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE] and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-15 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5 percent. There were 2 errors out of 32 opportunities, resulting in a 6.25% percent medication error involving 1 of 6 residents (Residents #37) reviewed for medication pass. MA A failed to administer 2 scheduled doses of the medication Lyrica 50 mg (used to treat chronic pain) as ordered by the physician for Resident #37 on 11/13/23 beginning at 9:08 a.m. This failure could place residents at risk for inaccurate drug administration resulting in a decline in health and decreased quality of life. Findings included: Record review of the face sheet dated indicated Resident #37 was an [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses included muscle spasms. She was readmitted [DATE] with diagnoses of fractures of 3 thoracic vertebra (backbone to which ribs are attached and her left tibia (the larger of the 2 bones in the lower leg) after a fall. Record review of an admission MDS assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-15 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure assessments accurately reflected the resident status for 1 of 12 residents (Resident #4) reviewed for MDS assessment accuracy. The facility did not accurately document Resident #4's weight and inaccurately indicated weight loss on her MDSs dated 10/07/22, 12/16/22, 02/07/23, 05/05/23, and 08/05/23. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving care and services to meet their needs. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 09/27/23 indicated Resident #4 was an [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included hypothyroidism (condition where the thyroid doesn't create and release enough thyroid hormone into your bloodstream), type 1 diabetes (chronic condition in which the pancreas produces little or no insulin) and obesity (overweight). Record review of the physician orders for November 2023 indicated Resident #4 had an order dated 07/31/22 for a carbohydrate controlled no added salt diet.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-15 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure individuals identified with MI, DD or ID were screened for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for PASRR (Resident #42) The facility did not have an accurate PASRR level 1 screening for Resident #42 upon admission, therefore a PASRR Evaluation was not conducted. This failure could place residents who have a diagnosis of mental disorder, developmental disability or intellectual disability at risk for a diminished quality of life and not receiving necessary care and services in accordance with individually assessed needs. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 11/14/23 indicated Resident #42 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted [DATE] and readmitted [DATE]. He had diagnoses of depression (mental illness that negatively affects how you feel, the way you think and how you act), anxiety (persistent and excessive worry that interferes with daily activities), and bipolar disorder (mental disorder associated with episodes of mood swings ranging from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-15 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents receiving enteral feeding received appropriate care and services to prevent complication of enteral feeding for 1 of 2 residents (Residents #38) reviewed for enteral feeding. The facility failed to change Resident #38's enteral feeding set/bag every 24 hours on 11/12/23 and did not follow physician order to provide enteral feeding only 20 hours daily on 11/13/23. These failures could place residents receiving enteral nutrition at increased risk of not receiving the proper nutrition and infection. Findings included: Record review of Resident #38's face sheet dated November 2023 indicated he was [AGE] years old and admitted to the facility 02/17/22. His diagnosis included dysphagia (difficulty or discomfort in swallowing) and gastrostomy (an opening into the stomach from the abdominal wall, made surgically for the introduction of food). Record review of physician orders indicated he was to receive enteral feeding (a way…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-15 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5 percent. There were 2 errors out of 32 opportunities, resulting in a 6.25% percent medication error involving 1 of 6 residents (Residents #37) reviewed for medication pass. MA A failed to administer 2 scheduled doses of the medication Lyrica 50 mg (used to treat chronic pain) as ordered by the physician for Resident #37 on 11/13/23 beginning at 9:08 a.m. This failure could place residents at risk for inaccurate drug administration resulting in a decline in health and decreased quality of life. Findings included: Record review of the face sheet dated indicated Resident #37 was an [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses included muscle spasms. She was readmitted [DATE] with diagnoses of fractures of 3 thoracic vertebra (backbone to which ribs are attached and her left tibia (the larger of the 2 bones in the lower leg) after a fall. Record review of an admission MDS assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-15 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary drugs when used without adequate monitoring for 1 of 13 residents (Resident #13) reviewed for unnecessary medication. The facility failed to monitor Resident #13 for side effects from 11/01/23 to 11/15/23 of the anticoagulant medication Eliquis (a blood thinning medication). This failure could place residents at risk for adverse consequences such as bleeding, bruising, and black colored stools related to the use of the anticoagulant medication. Findings included: Record review of Resident #13's face sheet, dated 11/13/23, indicated an [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis which included atrial fibrillation (an irregular and often rapid heart rhythm that can lead to blood clots in the heart and increases the risk of a stroke). Record review of physician orders dated November 2023, indicated Resident #13 was prescribed Eliquis 5 mg two times a day for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, comfortable, and sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of diseases for 1 for 5 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for infection control during medication pass. The facility failed to ensure MA A did not touch medications with her bare hand on 11/13/23 at 9:50 a.m. This failure could place residents at risk for the spread of infection and cross contamination. Findings included: Record review of Resident #3's face sheet dated 11/14/23 indicated a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of multiple sclerosis (disease in which immune system damages protective covering of the nerves), fibromyalgia (widespread muscle pain and tenderness), and chronic migraine (moderate to severe and intense headache which happens more than half of a month for 3 months). Record review of Resident #3's annual MDS assessment, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-07 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement written policies and procedures that prohibited and prevented abuse, neglect, and exploitation of residents and misappropriation of resident property for 2 of 4 residents (Residents #1 and #2) reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to implement their Abuse Policy and ensure all allegations of abuse were reported to HHSC within 2 hours of the allegation for Residents #1 and #2. This failure could place residents at risk of further abuse, physical harm, mental anguish, and emotional distress. Findings include: Record review of the facility's Abuse and Neglect policy, revision date 07/10/18, indicated .Procedure .Reporting/Investigation .All events that involve an allegation of abuse or involve a suspicious serious bodily injury of unknown must be reported immediately or within two hours of alleged violation Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 10/23/23, indicated Resident #1 was an [AGE] year-old male who was admitted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, if the events that caused the allegation involved abuse or resulted in serious bodily injury to the administrator or the facility and to other officials, including to the State Survey Agency, in accordance with State law through established procedures for 2 of 4 residents (Residents #1 and #2) reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to report allegations of abuse immediately, but not later than 2 hours to HHSC when Resident #1 was in Resident #2's room yelling at him. This failure could place residents at risk of verbal abuse, mental anguish, and emotional distress. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 10/23/23, indicated Resident #1 was an [AGE] year-old male who was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$15,288 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $15,288 — penalty dated 2026-04-08

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to FOCUSED POST ACUTE CARE PARTNERS — 25 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 51.9-0.9 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.1-1.1 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.2-0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.0≈ chain avg
The other 24 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.9★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
FPACP UPSHUR LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL100%since 02/01/2017
CONLEY, SHAWNIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/01/2017
MCKENZIE, MARKIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/01/2017
STRUBBE, LORETTAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/01/2017
FOCUSED POST ACUTE CARE PARTNERS LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2017
FOCUSED POST ACUTE CARE PARTNERS MANAGEMENT, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2017
BRENTON, HONEYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/16/2024
MCDANIEL, ADAMIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2024
POWELL, PAMIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/16/2025
SHELTON, ASHLEYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/23/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$3.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-21.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$188K
Related-party expense4% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 77%Medicare 3%Other / private 20%

About 77% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $188K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$287per resident / day
operating cost
$8,726per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$236per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Texas
$5,627/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,666/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 675602. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next