Focused Care at Linden
1201 W Houston St, Linden, TX 75563 · For profit - Corporation · 131 certified beds · (903) 756-5537 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jul 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 5 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (61) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $333,363 in federal fines (most recent 2026-04-15)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 16.8% | 15.8% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 1.9% | 3.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.5% | 0.3% | 0.9% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 3.1% | 0.8% | 2.0% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.8% | 2.4% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.0% | 3.3% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 6.0% | 14.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 30.9% | 18.0% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 94.9% | 98.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 13.8% | 3.8% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 15.8% | 13.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 0.0% | 9.6% | 17.1% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 64.3% | 88.0% | 79.4% | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.45 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 75% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.2%CMS range 6.7–16.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 4.8% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.77 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 131 beds and averages 40.6 residents a day — about 31% occupied, or roughly 90 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.61 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.73 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.23 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.30 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.73 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.80 to 0.57 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
61 citations, most serious first. The 17 most serious are shown; the remaining 44 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-04-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 (Resident #20) of 6 residents reviewed for accidents and supervision. The facility failed to ensure adequate supervision and implementation of safety interventions for a resident assessed to be at risk for elopement. This resulted in Resident #20 exiting the building on 03/19/2026 without staff knowledge or supervision, placing the resident at risk for harm. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) began on 03/19/2026 and ended on 03/20/2026. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. This failure could result in residents leaving the facility without supervision, placing them at risk for injury, harm, or death.Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 04/14/2026 indicated Resident #20 was a [AGE] year-old male that admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2025-02-12 · tag F0635 — patternProvide doctor's orders for the resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure, at the time each resident was admitted , there were physician orders for the resident's immediate care for 1 of 7 residents reviewed for admission physician orders. (Resident #93) The facility failed to initiate wound care treatment after Resident #93 admitted on [DATE], with multiple areas of shearing. The facility failed to initiate Resident #93's wound care orders noted in the wound care doctor's progress notes on 02/08/25 until 02/10/25. An IJ was identified on 02/11/25. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 5:00 p.m. While the IJ was removed on 02/12/25, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of pattern and severity level of no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy because all staff had not been trained on the process of carrying out orders for residents admitted with wounds or obtaining orders if no orders accompanied the resident, completion of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2025-02-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure treatment and services was provided, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing and prevent new ulcers from developing for 3 of 7 residents reviewed for quality of care. (Resident #93, Resident #11, and Resident #15) The facility failed to initiate wound care treatment after Resident #93 admitted on [DATE], with multiple areas of shearing. The facility failed to perform a weekly skin assessment on Resident #93 that was due on 02/08/25. The facility failed to initiate Resident #93's wound care orders noted in the wound care doctor's progress notes on 02/08/25 until 02/10/25. The facility failed to implement a specialty mattress (use in the treatment and prevention of pressure ulcers) for Resident #93, per their policy, due to multiple stage 3 pressure injuries on 02/01/25. The facility failed to float Resident #93's heels on 02/10/25 and 02/11/25. The facility failed to offload and/or reposition Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-03-13 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — patternImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to immediately consult the physician when a resident had a significant change in physical and mental condition for 1 of 7 residents reviewed for physician notification (Resident #1.) LVN A noted Resident #1 had a change in condition on 02/09/24 around 2:00 p.m. but LVN A did not consult the physician until 8:00 p.m. Facility staff failed to consult the physician when Resident #1's oxygen level was 87 percent and had vomited a black substance. The resident was also lethargic/unresponsive at dinner and unable to eat with assistance. EMS was called and placed a face mask on Resident #1 at 15L of oxygen and transported the resident to the ER where she was diagnosed with sepsis secondary to pneumonia. The resident was intubated and placed in ICU. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 03/12/24. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 1:05 p.m. While the IJ was removed on 03/13/24, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2024-03-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure treatment and care was provided to meet professional standards of practice for 1 of 7 residents reviewed for quality of care. (Resident #1) The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was provided a timely assessment when she experienced a change of condition. LVN A noted Resident #1 had a change in condition on 02/09/24 around 2:00 p.m. but LVN A did not assess the resident at that time. At 8:00 p.m., Resident #1's oxygen level was 87 percent and she had vomited a black substance. The resident was also lethargic/unresponsive at dinner and unable to eat with assistance. EMS was called and placed a face mask on Resident #1 at 15L of oxygen and transported the resident to the ER where she was diagnosed with sepsis secondary to pneumonia. The resident was intubated and placed in ICU. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 03/12/24. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 1:05 p.m. While the IJ was removed on 03/13/24, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-03-13 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free of any significant medication errors for 2 of 7 residents reviewed for medications. (Resident #1 and Resident #2) The facility failed to ensure: *Resident #1 (deceased ) was given medications as prescribed. She was given Venlafaxine 75mg two times daily for a total of 6 times over a period of 5 days when the medication was supposed to be on hold. *Resident #1 was given Lisinopril and Metoprolol Succinate ER 12 times in [DATE] and 3 times in February 2024 when the medications were supposed to be held because her blood pressure was below the parameters. *Resident #1's orders were followed due to the possible interactions of Venlafaxine, with Tramadol, Ibuprofen and other medications Resident #1 was receiving. The NP said to monitor for low blood pressure and fever due to Serotonin syndrome. There was no indication this monitoring was provided. *Resident #2 (a current resident) Carvedilol 3.125 mg blood pressure medications given…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-04-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible and provide supervision to prevent avoidable accidents for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for accidents. (Residents #2) The facility failed to keep Resident #2 free of injury after her bed rolled, hitting a wall, while LVN C provided incontinent care. This failure could place residents at risk of injury from accident and hazards. Findings included: Record review of the face sheet dated 04/09/25 revealed Resident #2 was [AGE] years old and admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (lung disease), peripheral vascular disease (a condition where blood vessels outside the heart and brain become narrowed or blocked, restricting blood flow, often to the legs and feet), and acquired absence of right leg above the knee. Record review of the quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #2 was understood and understood other. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-24 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to send a copy of the transfer or discharge notice to a representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) reviewed for discharge notices. The facility did not ensure Ombudsman A was provided with a copy of the 30-day discharge notices for Resident #1 and Resident #2. This failure places residents at risk of not having access to an advocate who could have informed them of their options and rights and being inappropriately discharged from the facility. The findings included: 1. Record review of the face sheet, dated 06/24/26, reflected Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of unspecified dementia without behaviors (loss of cognitive functioning that interferes with daily life). Record review of the quarterly MDS assessment, dated 06/05/26, reflected Resident #1 had clear speech, was understood by others, and was able to understand…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-15 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals to meet the needs of each resident for 2 of 17 residents (Resident #3 and Resident #21) reviewed for pharmacy services.1.The facility failed to administer (7) doses of Multivitamin with minerals, (9) doses of Pepcid (famotidine-medication to reduce stomach acid), and (10) doses of Stress B Complex (dietary supplement designed to support energy and immune system function during times of stress) for Resident #3.2. The facility failed to administer (12) doses of Multivitamin with minerals, (14) does of famotidine, and (10) doses of GlycoLax (medication for constipation) for Resident #21 from 3/01/2026 to 4/13/2026.These failures could place residents at risk for not receiving the intended therapeutic benefit of prescribed medications. 1. Record review of a face sheet dated 4/15/2026 indicated Resident #3 was [AGE] year-old male originally…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled and stored in accordance with professional standards for 2 of 6 residents (Resident #27 and Resident #8) and 1 of 2 medication carts (100/300 hall medication cart) reviewed for drugs and biologicals.1. The facility failed to ensure RN E locked the 100/300 hall medication cart when she went into Resident #27's room on 4/14/2026.2. The facility failed to ensure RN E did not leave Resident #8's medication cards of furosemide (used to increase urine production to decrease fluid levels), carvedilol (used to treat high blood pressure), hydralazine (used to treat high blood pressure), glipizide (used to treat high blood sugar), gabapentin (used to treat nerve pain), Jardiance (used to treat high blood sugar), and clonidine (used to treat high blood pressure) on top of the medication cart unsupervised on 4/14/2026. 3. The facility failed to ensure RN E locked the 100/300 hall medication cart when she went into the medication room on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the facility's only kitchen reviewed for food safety requirements.The facility failed to ensure there was minimal carbon buildup on 3 skillets.The facility failed to ensure the stove was clean from debris and black carbon buildup on the stove top.The facility failed to ensure there was no grease buildup on the fryer.The facility failed to ensure the toaster was clear of debris on 4/14/2026.These failures could place residents at risk of foodborne illness and food contamination. Findings included:During initial tour observations in the kitchen on 4/13/2026 at 9:08 AM and accompanied by Dietary Manager, there was yellow to amber colored film build up behind the [NAME] and along the right side of the [NAME] with a baking sheet screwed into wall to divide the [NAME] from the oven. The baking sheet observed to have black area with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and provide care in a manner that promoted maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 1 of 17 residents (Resident #21) reviewed for resident rights.1. The facility failed to ensure RN E closed the window blinds, opening to the parking lot in front of the building, while performing medication administration and tube feeding through Resident #21's PEG tube (tube inserted through the abdominal wall directly into the stomach to deliver nutrition, fluids, and medications when oral intake was insufficient) on 4/14/2026.2. The facility failed to ensure RN E did not discuss Resident #21's family, by saying his family is very demanding and particular about his care and his family doesn't like it when we use too much water, while setting up supplies, providing medication administration and tube feeding through his PEG tube on 4/14/2026.These failures could place residents at risk of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-15 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident's representative when there were changes in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #50) reviewed for notification of changes.The facility failed to notify Resident #50's RP after resident- to- resident incident resulting in a scratch to right forearm on 3/30/2026.This failure could place residents at risk of not having their preferred responsible party represent them in care decisions.Findings Included: Record review of Resident #50's face sheet dated 4/14/2026 indicated an [AGE] year old male who was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Atherosclerotic heart disease (a type of heart disease when the coronary arteries become narrowed or blocked due to the buildup of plaque which reduces blood flow to the heart muscle), muscle wasting and atrophy (a loss of muscle mass, strength, and function), ataxic (poor muscle control that causes clumsy movements affecting walking,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-15 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an encoded, accurate, and complete MDS discharge assessment was electronically completed and transmitted to the CMS System within 14 days after completion for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #10) reviewed for discharge MDS assessments. The facility did not ensure Resident #10's discharge MDS assessment was transmitted within 14 days of completion. This failure could place residents at risk of not having records completed and submitted in a timely manner as required. Findings included: Record review of Resident #10's, undated face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #10 had diagnoses which included hypertension (high blood pressure) and arthritis. The face sheet indicated Resident #10 was discharged on 11/01/2025. Record review of Resident #10's admission MDS dated [DATE] revealed he had a BIMS of 14, which indicated no cognitive impairment. Resident #10 required supervision with all ADLs. Record review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and records reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment and described the services that were to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 (Resident #8) of 15 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #8 had a comprehensive care plan for pain. This failure could place residents at risk of not having their individualized needs met and a decline in their quality of care and life. Findings included: Record review of the face sheet, dated 04/14/2026, reflected Resident #8 was a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of heart failure (a chronic condition where the heart cannot pump enough blood to meet the body's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-19 · tag F0776 — isolatedProvide timely, approved x-ray services, or have an agreement with an approved provider to obtain them.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review the facility failed to provide or obtain radiology and other diagnostic services to meet the needs of its residents for 1 of 4 (Resident #1) residents reviewed for radiology services. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's STAT x-ray results were obtained and reported to the physician in a timely manner. Resident #1's x-ray results were not reviewed by the facility until 10/20/25, which was 4 days after the STAT x-ray was performed. This failure could result in a delay in treatment of broken bones, increased pain, and a decreased quality of life. The findings included: Record review of the face sheet, dated 10/30/25, reflected Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia (memory loss) without behaviors, pressure ulcer of sacral region, stage 4 (wound that exposes muscle, bone, or tendon to the sacrum [triangular bone in the lower back formed from fused vertebrae and situated between the two hip…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary services to maintain personal hygiene for 1 of 10 residents reviewed for ADLs. (Resident #2)The facility failed to provide Resident #2 with his scheduled showers.This failure could place residents who required assistance from staff for ADLs at risk of not receiving care and services to meet their needs which could result in poor care, risk for skin breakdown, feelings of poor self-esteem, lack of dignity and health.Findings included:Record review of a face sheet dated 07/14/25 revealed Resident #2 was a [AGE] year-old male and was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral palsy (a group of disorders that affect movement and posture, impacting motor skills and muscle tone), personal history of traumatic brain injury (a brain injury that occurs when a sudden trauma to the head disrupts normal brain function), and reduced mobility. Record review of a quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 44 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-16 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the right to be free from abuse was provided for 1 of 7 reviewed for abuse. (Resident #1) The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was free from abuse when RCP A told Resident #1, You better get out of my face and get back in your room. on 07/05/25 as witnessed by LVN B and LVN C. This failure could place residents at risk for verbal abuse and emotional harm.Findings included:Record review of a face sheet dated 07/14/25 revealed Resident #1 was [AGE] years old and was initially admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including congestive heart failure (chronic condition where the heart cannot pump enough blood to meet the body's needs), bipolar disorder (a mental illness that causes unusual shifts in mood, energy, activity levels, concentration, and the ability to carry out day-to-day tasks), and anxiety disorder. Record review of an annual MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 had a BIMS score of 15 which indicated intact cognition. The MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-16 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment of residents for 1 of 7 residents reviewed for abuse and neglect.The facility failed to prevent Resident #1 from being abused when RCP A told Resident #1 You better get out of my face and get back in your room. on 07/05/25 as witnessed by LVN B and LVN C.The facility failed to immediately suspend RCP A. The facility staff failed to immediately interview Resident #1 concerning the allegations. These failures could place residents at risk for continued abuse and neglect due to inappropriate interventions and failure to report the allegations of abuse timely. Findings included:Record review of a face sheet dated 07/14/25 revealed Resident #1 was [AGE] years old and was initially admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including congestive heart failure (chronic condition where the heart cannot pump enough blood to meet the body's needs), bipolar…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, or mistreatment are reported immediately or not later than 2 hours for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for abuse and neglect. (Resident #1) The facility staff (RCP A, LVN B, and the Social Worker) failed to report an allegation of abuse immediately to the Abuse Coordinator after Resident #1 alleged that RCP D threw a blanket on her face and told her to shut the hell up. This failure could place residents at risk for abuse and neglect. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 04/09/25 revealed Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old female and was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder bipolar type (combines symptoms of both schizophrenia (like hallucinations and delusions) and bipolar disorder (like mania and depression), diabetes, and high blood pressure. Record review of a quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 was understood and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-02-12 · tag F0730 — widespreadObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to complete a performance review of each Resident Care Provider (RCP) at least once every 12 months, for 5 of 5 (RCP L, RCP O, RCP U, RCP V, and RCP W) reviewed for annual competency evaluations. The facility failed to complete annual RCP (facility titles CNA as RCP) competency evaluations for RCP L, RCP O, RCP U, RCP V, and RCP W based on the personnel file review results. This failure could affect residents and place them at risk of not receiving consistent, appropriate interventions necessary to meet the residents' needs. Findings included: Record review of the Personnel File Review completed on 02/12/25, indicated RCP L, RCP O, RCP U, RCP V, and RCP W did not have a competency evaluation on file. The Personnel File Review indicated RCP L's date of hire was 01/07/25, RCP O 12/5/24, RCP U 12/5/24, RCP V 10/17/24, and RCP W 11/21/24. During an interview on 02/12/25 at 1:44 p.m., the Director of Nurses said that she did not know if the RCP (CNA) competencies had been completed. She said she could not find them. She said that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and records reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident to ensure the comprehensive care plan described the services and interventions to be used to attain and maintain the resident's practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 3 of 13 residents reviewed for care plans (Resident #1, Resident #11, and Resident #15). The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's history of a fall, with a fracture prior to admission, triggered on the 12/08/24 MDS and actual fall on 01/15/25 were care planned. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's unplanned weight loss experienced on 01/07/25, was care planned. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's risk of pressure ulcers (is a localized area of skin damage that develops when pressure on the skin cuts off blood flow to the area), triggered on the 12/08/24 MDS, was care planned. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 experienced pain and received pain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that respiratory care was provided consistent with professional standards of practice for 4 of 18 residents reviewed for respiratory care. (Resident #18, Resident #22, Resident #24, and Resident #38) 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #18 had a filter (the air passes through a series of filters that remove impurities, ensuring that the oxygen delivered to the patient was of high quality) in the oxygen concentrator (takes air from the surroundings, extracts oxygen, and filters it into purified oxygen for resident to breathe). 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #18's compartment that would have held the oxygen concentrator filter did not have gray fuzzy and hair-like particles covering the air intake area. 3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #24's oxygen concentrator filter was not covered in thick gray fuzzy and hair-like particles. 4. The facility failed to ensure Resident #22's oxygen concentrator filter was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-12 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services including procedures that assure the accurate administering of all drugs and biologicals, to meet the needs of 2 of 13 residents (Resident #1 and Resident #15) reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's Atorvastatin (is medication used to lower cholesterol and triglycerides (fats) levels to help prevent heart disease, angina (chest pain), strokes, and heart attacks) was available for administration on 01/28/25. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's Cannabidiol (is an active cannabinoid used as an adjunctive treatment for the management of seizures) was available for administration on 01/10/25, 01/13/25, 01/14/25, 01/15/25, and 01/16/25. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's Lamotrigine (is a medication used to treat epilepsy and stabilize mood in bipolar disorder) was available for administration on 01/15/25, 01/16/25, 01/17/25, 01/18/25, and 01/19/25. The facility failed to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-12 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents have the right to be informed in advance, by the physician or other practitioner or professional, of the risks and benefits of proposed care, of treatment and treatment alternatives and to choose the option he or she prefers for 3 of 18 residents reviewed for the right to be informed. (Resident's #1, Resident #17, and Resident #18) 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's psychoactive (substances that, when taken in or administered into one's system, affect mental processes) medication therapy consent was completed upon admission and prior to the administration for Sertraline (is an antidepressant). Resident #1's Sertraline was prescribed on 12/03/24. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #17's Consent for Antipsychotic (used to treat certain mental/mood disorders) or Neuroleptic (also known as Antipsychotic) Medication Treatment HHSC Form 3713 was correctly completed for Seroquel (Quetiapine) (antipsychotic medication used…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-12 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident had the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for 1 of 18 (Resident #18) residents reviewed for call lights. The facility failed to ensure Resident #18's call light button was within reach while Resident #18 was in her bed as evidenced by call light button was draped over the nightstand against the wall on her left side. This failure could place residents at risk for a delay in assistance and decreased quality of life, self-worth, and dignity. Findings included: Record review of Resident #18's face sheet dated 2/10/25 indicated she was [AGE] years old and admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #18 had diagnoses which included Severe Morbid Obesity (severely overweight), reduced mobility, history of Cerebrovascular Disease (disruption of blood supply to the brain), hemiplegia and hemiparesis following Cerebral Infarction affecting the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-12 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure individuals with mental health disorders were provided an accurate Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Screenings for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #7) reviewed for PASRR. The facility failed to refer Resident #7 for a PASRR review following a new mental illness diagnosis of Bipolar Disorder (mental illness associated with episodes of mood swings ranging from extreme sadness to excitement) on 05/23/23. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving needed assessments (PASRR Evaluation), individualized care, and specialized services to meet their needs. Findings included: Record review of Resident #7's face sheet dated 2/10/25 indicated she was [AGE] years old and admitted initially to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #7 had diagnoses which included Bipolar Disorder with on onset date of 5/23/23. Record review of Resident #7's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #7 made herself understood and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-12 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level I assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #9) reviewed for PASRR Level I screenings. The facility failed to ensure the accuracy of the PASRR Level 1 screening for Resident #9. The PASRR Level 1 screening did not indicate a diagnosis of mental illness, although the diagnoses (Major Depressive Disorder, Schizoaffective Disorder, Bipolar Disorder) were present upon Resident #9's admission date on 12/30/22. This failure could place residents who had a mental illness at risk of not receiving a needed assessment (PASRR Evaluation), individualized care, or specialized services to meet their needs. Findings included: Record review of Resident #9's face sheet, dated 11/18/24, indicated he was a [AGE] year-old male, admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted most recently on 04/20/23. His diagnoses included Major Depressive Disorder (a mood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-12 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the baseline care plan that included the instructions for resident care needed to provide effective and person-centered care was completed and provided to the resident and/or their representative for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for new admissions (Resident #93). The facility failed to provide Resident #93, a copy of the summary of the baseline care plan. Resident #93 was admitted on [DATE] and had not received a copy of the summary as of 02/10/25. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving care and services to meet their needs. Findings included: Record review of Resident #93's face sheet dated 02/11/25 indicated Resident #93 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #93 had diagnoses including acute kidney failure (when the kidneys suddenly can't filter waste products from the blood), urinary tract infection (is an infection in any part of your urinary system: kidneys, bladder, ureters, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, personal and oral hygiene for 1 of 13 residents (Resident #93) reviewed for ADL (activities of daily living) care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #93 was provided oral care on 02/10/25. The facility failed to ensure Resident #93 was provided bed baths on 02/10/25. Theses failures could place residents who required assistance from staff for ADLs at risk of not receiving care and services to meet their needs which could result in feelings of poor self-esteem, decrease socialization and skin breakdown. Findings included: Record review of Resident #93's face sheet dated 02/11/25 indicated Resident #93 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #93 had diagnoses including acute kidney failure (when the kidneys suddenly can't filter waste products from the blood),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 2 of 16 residents (Resident #12, Resident #35) reviewed for adequate supervision. The facility failed to prevent Resident #35 from having rubbing alcohol in his room. The facility failed to ensure that electrical wires were encased in their protective covering and not exposed for Resident #12 These failures could place residents at risk for injury, harm, and impairment or death. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #35's admission Record indicated he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included Acute and Chronic Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia (a medical condition where the lungs are unable to adequately exchange oxygen and carbon dioxide over a prolonged period, leading to persistently low levels of oxygen in the blood), Peripheral Vascular Disease (a condition that affects the blood vessels outside the heart and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-12 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with urinary incontinence, based on the resident's comprehensive assessment, received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections (UTI) for 3 of 6 residents (Residents #10, Resident #15, and Resident #22) reviewed for urinary catheters. 1. The facility failed to ensure RCP O performed hand hygiene and changed gloves appropriately while providing incontinent/urinary catheter care to Resident #10. 2. The facility failed to ensure RCP O performed proper incontinent/urinary catheter care to Resident #10. 3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #15 had an indwelling (foley) catheter securement device on 2/10/25 and 2/11/25. 4. The facility failed to ensure Resident #22 had an indwelling (foley) catheter securement device on 2/10/25 and 2/11/25. 5. The facility failed to document Resident #22's indwelling (foley) catheter care on 1/05/25 (6am and 6pm), 1/18/25 (6am), 1/26/25 (6am), 2/03/25 (6am),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-12 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as usual body weight or desirable body weight range and electrolyte balance, unless the resident's clinical condition demonstrated that this was not possible or resident preferences indicated otherwise for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for nutrition. The facility failed to obtain Resident #1's weekly weights times 4 on admission. The facility failed to obtain Resident #1's readmission weight after her hospital stay (12/26/24-12/31/24). Resident #1 was readmitted on [DATE]. The facility failed to follow Resident #1's January 2025 dietary recommendation for the health shakes to be changed to house shakes (nutritional supplement for weight concerns) and given for 90 days. These failures could place residents at risk for malnourishment, weight loss, skin breakdown, and decreased quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 01/10/25 indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-12 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to attempt to use alternatives prior to installing a side or bed rail, obtain informed consent prior to installation, ensure correct installation, use and maintenance of bedrails for 1 of 10 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for bedrails. The facility failed to ensure informed consent for the use of Resident #1's bed rails were obtained prior to installation. The facility failed to obtain a bed rail assessment to assess the risk of entrapment for Resident #1's bed rails. These failures could place residents at risk of entrapment or injury. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 01/10/25 indicated Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 had diagnoses including Asperger's syndrome (is a term sometimes used to describe a developmental disorder that's part of the autism spectrum disorder (ASD)), epilepsy (is a chronic brain disorder characterized by recurrent seizures,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-12 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary medications (is a medication used: in excessive doses (including duplicate therapy); or for excessive duration; or without adequate monitoring; or without adequate indication for its use; or in the presence of adverse consequences which indicate the dose should be reduced or discontinued) for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #1 and Resident #11) reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1, and Resident #11 had monitoring for being on an antiplatelet. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 had side effect monitoring for her anticonvulsant use. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 had documented diagnoses entered for use of Lamotrigine (is a medication used to treat epilepsy and stabilize mood in bipolar disorder), Levothyroxine (is used to treat hypothyroidism), Minocycline (is an antibiotic that treats bacterial infections, Ondansetron (is used to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-12 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure each residents' drug regimen was free from unnecessary psychotropic drugs (without adequate behavior monitoring) for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #1, Resident #11) reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 had behavior (monitor activities and mood) and side effect (are defined as unintended responses to approved pharmaceuticals (is any kind of drug used for medicinal purposes) given in appropriate dosages) monitoring for her prescribed Sertraline (antidepressant; is used to treat depression). The facility failed to ensure Resident #11 had behavior monitoring for her prescribed Buspirone (antianxiety; is used to treat anxiety disorders or in the short-term treatment of symptoms of anxiety) and Venlafaxine (antidepressant; is used to treat major depressive disorder, anxiety, and panic disorder). These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving the intended therapeutic benefits of their psychotropic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-12 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents were free of significant medication errors for 2 of 13 residents (Residents #1 and Resident #93) reviewed for medication administration. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's Protonix (is used to treat certain conditions in which there is too much acid in the stomach) was scheduled before meals for optimal desired results. The facility failed to ensure Resident #93's prescribed Midodrine (is used to treat low blood pressure (hypotension)) was not administered when her blood pressure was outside of the ordered parameters 2/6/25, 2/7/25, 2/8/25, 2/9/25, 2/10/25, and 2/11/25. The facility failed to ensure Resident #93 was administered Midodrine with meals per the physician's order. These failures could place residents at risk of medical complications and not receiving the therapeutic effects of their medications. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 01/10/25 indicated Resident #1 was a [AGE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-12 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates residents' food preferences for 1 of 18 residents (Resident #17) reviewed for food preferences and the accommodation of resident's meal choices. The facility failed to honor Resident #17's request for an alternate meal choice for lunch service on 2/12/25 without state surveyor intervention. This failure could result in a decrease in resident choices, diminished interest in meals, and weight loss. Findings included: Record review of Resident #17's face sheet dated 2/12/25 revealed she was [AGE] years old and admitted to the facility initially on 3/02/17 and re-admitted [DATE]. Resident #17 had diagnoses including bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, and anxiety disorder. Record review of Resident #17's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated she had a BIMS score of 15, which indicated she was cognitively intact. The MDS indicated Resident #17…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 18 residents (Residents #10) reviewed for infection control practices. 1. The facility failed to ensure RCP O performed hand hygiene and changed gloves appropriately while providing incontinent care/indwelling urinary catheter care to Resident #10. 2. The facility failed to ensure RCP O did not place a plastic bag onto Resident #10's low air loss mattress (that required no bed sheets) twice that fallen onto the floor twice while RCP O performed incontinent/urinary catheter care. These failures could place residents at risk for cross contamination and the spread of infection. Findings included: Record review of Resident #10's face sheet dated 2/11/25 indicated she was [AGE] years old and was admitted to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents with pressure ulcers received the necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection, and prevent new ulcers from developing for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for pressure injury. The facility failed to ensure RN E performed wound care to Resident #1's right heel DTI (deep tissue injury- pressure induced damage to underlying tissues to intact skin) per the physician's orders. The facility failed to ensure RN E applied kerlix (rolled gauze) and ace wrap (elastic wrap) appropriately to Resident #1's right foot/leg. These failures could place residents at risk for deterioration of wounds. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 10/29/24 indicated he was [AGE] years old and admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #3 had diagnoses which included diabetes (high blood sugar), pressure induced deep tissue damage of right heel,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with urinary incontinence, based on the resident's comprehensive assessment, received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections (UTI) for 1 of 5 residents (Residents #2) reviewed for urinary catheters. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 had an indwelling urinary catheter (tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) securement/anchor device (used to secure an indwelling urinary catheter). 2. The facility failed to ensure CNA A performed hand hygiene and changed gloves appropriately while providing incontinent care/indwelling urinary catheter care to Resident #2. These failures could place residents at risk for indwelling urinary catheter dislodgement, urethral (empties urine from the bladder and out of the body) damage, pain, and urinary tract infections. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #2's face sheet dated 10/30/24 indicated she was [AGE] years old and was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #1 and Resident #3) reviewed for infection control. 1. The facility failed to ensure RN E followed the Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) (interventions to prevent spread of infection in high-risk residents) policy of wearing a gown and gloves until she completed Resident #1's pressure ulcer wound care to his right heel. 2. The facility failed to ensure CNA D followed the EBP policy of wearing a gown while performing urinary catheter (tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) care for Resident #3 who had a urinary catheter. 3. The facility failed to ensure CNA D changed her gloves after providing urinary catheter care to Resident #3 prior to touching Resident #3's clean catheter…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment to those residents who eat their meals in one of one dinning rooms. The facility failed to identify and rectify foul smells in the dining room. This failure could place residents at risk of an unsafe or uncomfortable environment and a decrease in quality of life and self-worth. Findings included: During an observation on 01/08/2024 at 10:30 a.m., it was observed that the dining room had a foul smell similar to the smell of sewage. During an interview and observation on 01/08/2024 at 11:00 a.m., Director of Plant Operations J stated that there were no drains that were backing up sewage in the facility. He said in the kitchen there was a drain cleaning solution that was pumped into a pipe while dishes were being washed. He said that was to ensure that the drainage pipe was cleaned and to prevent a smell from occurring. He said at the end of November 2023 and early December…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-10 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure, based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident, residents who had not used psychotropic drugs were not given these drugs unless the medication was necessary to treat a specific condition as diagnosed and documented in the clinical record for 3 of 5 residents (Resident #19, Resident #25, and Resident #29) reviewed for unnecessary psychotropic medications (are medications that affect the mind, emotions, and behavior). The facility failed to ensure Resident #19 had behavior monitoring for her prescribed antianxiety (treats anxiety disorders), anticonvulsant (are prescription medications that help treat and prevent seizures), and antipsychotic (are the main class of drugs used to treat people with schizophrenia) medications. The facility failed to ensure Resident #19 had side effect monitoring for her prescribed antianxiety, anticonvulsant, and antipsychotic medications. The facility failed to ensure Resident #25 had an appropriate diagnosis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments for 1 of 15 residents (Resident #14) and 1 of 1 treatment carts reviewed for drug storage. The facility failed to securely store over the counter medication Neosporin for Resident #14. LVN D failed to securely lock the wound treatment cart. These failures could place residents at risk for adverse reactions. Findings included: 1. Record review of the face sheet 1/8/2024 indicated Resident #14 was [AGE] years old and was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Ataxia (poor muscle control), Functional urinary incontinence (involuntary leakage of urine due to environment or physical barriers to toileting), History of falling, lack of coordination, and diabetes. Record review of the MDS dated [DATE] indicated Resident # 14 was usually understood and understood by others. Resident #14 indicated a BIMS score of 5 indicating Resident #14 was cognitively impaired. Resident #14 MDS indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to promote care for residents in a manner and in an environment that maintained or enhanced each resident's dignity and respect in full recognition of his or her individuality for 1 of 15 residents reviewed for dignity. (Resident #19) The facility failed to provide Resident #19 with a type of clothing protector (designed to protect clothing from mealtime mishaps) to ensure she did not have food on gown after eating. The facility failed to ensure Resident #19 was cleaned up promptly after meals. These failures placed residents at risk for diminished quality of life, loss of dignity and self-worth. Findings included: Record review of Resident #19's face sheet printed 01/09/24 indicated Resident #19 was a [AGE] year-old female and admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including abnormal posture, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (is one-sided muscle weakness) following cerebral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-10 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure the residents has the right to be informed of the risks and participate in, his or her treatment which included the right to be informed in advance, by the physician or other practitioner or professional, of the risks and benefits of proposed care, of treatment and treatment alternatives or treatment options and to choose the alternative or options he or she preferred, for 2 of 15 residents (Resident #19 and Resident #242) reviewed for resident rights. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #19's psychoactive (substances that, when taken in or administered into one's system, affect mental processes) medication therapy consents were completed properly upon admission and prior to the administration of Zyprexa ( antipsychotic medication that can treat several mental health conditions like schizophrenia and bipolar disorder), Venlafaxine ( used to treat major depressive disorder, anxiety, and panic disorder), Trazodone ( used to treat…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-10 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for 1 of 15 residents (Resident #19) reviewed for reasonable accommodations. The facility failed to ensure Resident #19's call light was placed on her dominant side and hand without a contracture (is a fixed tightening of muscle, tendons, ligaments, or skin). This failure could place residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings included: Record review of Resident #19's face sheet printed 01/09/24 indicated Resident #19 was a [AGE] year-old female and admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including contracture, left hand and ankle, abnormal posture, hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (is one-sided muscle weakness) following cerebral infarction (stroke) affecting left no-dominant side, and muscle weakness. Record review of Resident #19's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-10 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility did not immediately notify the physician and resident representative of a significant change in in the resident's mental or psychosocial status for 1 of 15 residents (Resident #5) reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to inform the attending Physician and the residents representative for Resident #5 when she barricaded herself in her room on 10/22/2023. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving appropriate care and interventions. Findings included : Record Review of Resident #5 Face Sheet dated 1/8/2024 indicated Resident #5 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #5's diagnosis included Alzheimer's disease with late onset (progressive decline in episodic memory that begins after the age of 64), Dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere (general term for loss of memory, language, and problem-solving abilities), unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbances and other…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-10 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure assessments accurately reflected the status for 1 of 15 resident reviewed for assessments. (Resident #25) The facility failed to code Resident #25's fall on his MDS. This failure could place residents at risk of not having individual needs met. Findings included: Record review of Resident#25's face sheet printed on 01/09/24 indicated Resident #25 was an [AGE] year-old male and was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Parkinson's, Dementia, moderate, with other behavioral disturbance and fall on same level from slipping, tripping, and stumbling with subsequent striking against other objects. Record review of Resident #25's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #25 was usually understood and usually had the ability to understand others. The MDS indicated Resident #25 had a BIMS score of 03 which indicated severe cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated Resident #25 was dependent for walking and substantial/maximal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-10 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to incorporate the recommendations from the PASRR level II determination and the PASRR evaluation report into a resident's assessment, care planning, and transitions of care for 1 of 5 resident's (Resident #34) reviewed for PASRR. The facility failed to submit NFSS forms timely for Resident #34. This failure could place residents identified at a level II for PASRR evaluation at risk for their specialized services not being provided in a timely manner. Findings included: Record review of face sheet dated 01/08/24 indicated Resident #34 was [AGE] years old and was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of myotonic muscular dystrophy (a genetic condition that causes progressive muscle weakness and wasting), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and lack of coordination. Record review of a quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #34 was usually understood and understood others. The MDS indicated a BIMS of 08 which indicated moderate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-10 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure individuals with mental disorders were evaluated and received care and services in the most integrated setting appropriate to their needs for 1 of 5 residents, (Resident #16) reviewed for PASRR Level 1 screenings. The facility failed to complete a PASRR Level 1 screening for Resident #16 following a discharge from a mental health hospital with a new diagnosis of mental illness. This failure could place residents at risk of not being evaluated for PASRR services and receiving needed services. The findings were: Record review of face sheet dated 01/09/24 revealed Resident #16 was [AGE] years old and was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Schizoaffective Disorder (a mental health disorder that is marked by a combination of schizophrenia symptoms, such as hallucinations or delusions, and mood disorder symptoms, such as depression or mania), Bipolar type (episodes of mania and sometimes depression) with an onset of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-10 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan within 48 hours of a resident's admission for one (Resident #192) of six residents reviewed for care plan completion. The facility failed to complete Resident #192's baseline care plan within the required 48-hour timeframe of admission. This failure could place residents who were admitted within the last 30 days at risk for not receiving necessary care and services or having important care needs identified. Findings included : Review of Resident #192's face sheet dated 12/29/2023 revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Senile Degeneration of the Brain (the mental deterioration or loss of intellectual ability), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (group of diseases that cause airflow blockage and breathing-related problems), and Dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities). Review of Resident #192's Baseline Care Plan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan to meet each resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs for 2 of 15 residents reviewed for care plans. (Resident# 19, Resident #29) The facility failed to implement Resident #19's care plan intervention to off-load (is described as lifting or pushing an area of high pressure away from the cause of the pressure) her heels when in bed. The facility failed to care plan Resident # 19's diagnosis of Type 2 diabetes (is a condition that happens because of a problem in the way the body regulates and uses sugar as a fuel) and use of insulin (therapy often is an important part of diabetes treatment), diuretic (are medicines that help reduce fluid buildup in the body), opioid (sometimes called narcotics, are a type of drug), and antiplatelet (are medications that prevent blood clots from forming) coded of her MDS. The facility failed to care plan Resident #19's use of an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-10 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident's person-centered comprehensive care plan was reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment for 1 of 15 residents (Residents #34), reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to revise and update Resident #34's comprehensive care plan for an anticoagulant medication (a medication that helps prevent blood clots). This failure could affect residents of the facility by not addressing their physical, mental, and psychosocial needs for each to attain or maintain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial outcome. Findings included: Record review of face sheet dated 01/08/24 indicated Resident #34 was [AGE] years old and was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of myotonic muscular dystrophy (a genetic condition that causes progressive muscle weakness and wasting), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and atrial flutter (a type of abnormal heart rhythm). Record review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary services to maintain personal hygiene for 1 of 15 resident reviewed for ADLs. (Resident #19) The facility failed remove Resident #19's unwanted facial hair. The facility failed to provide Resident #19 her schedule bath/showers. These failures could place residents who required assistance from staff for ADLs at risk of not receiving care and services to meet their needs which could result in poor care, risk for skin breakdown, feelings of poor self-esteem, lack of dignity and health. Findings included: Record review of Resident #19's face sheet printed 01/09/24 indicated Resident #19 was a [AGE] year-old female and admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (is one-sided muscle weakness) following cerebral infarction (stroke) affecting left no-dominant side and muscle weakness. Record review of Resident #19's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-10 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with limited range of motion receives appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion and/or to prevent further decrease in range of motion for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #19) reviewed for range of motion and mobility The facility failed to ensure Resident #19 had on a hand device. This failure had the potential to affect resident with limited ROM by placing them at risk for a decline in their functional abilities. Findings included: Record review of Resident #19's face sheet printed 01/09/24 indicated Resident #19 was a [AGE] year-old female and admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including contracture, left hand and ankle, abnormal posture, hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (is one-sided muscle weakness) following cerebral infarction (stroke) affecting left no-dominant side, and muscle weakness. Record review of Resident #19's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-10 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections (UTI) for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #23) who were reviewed for indwelling urinary catheter care. The facility failed to ensure CNA F followed appropriate procedures and infection control during foley catheter care for Resident #23. This failure could place residents at risk for urinary tract infections. Findings included: Record review of Resident #23's face sheet dated 1/09/23 indicated Resident #23 was a [AGE] year-old female and admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including paralytic syndrome (unable to move) following a cerebrovascular disease (problem with blood flow to the brain causing damage to the brain), paraplegia (complete or partial loss of muscle function to all or part of the trunk, legs, or pelvic organs), reduced mobility, and hypertension (high blood pressure). Record review of Resident #23's quarterly MDS assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-10 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that respiratory care was provided consistent with professional standards of practice for 2 of 15 residents reviewed for respiratory care. (Resident #13 and Resident #19) 1.The facility failed to ensure Resident #13's yankauer suction catheter (hard-plastic tip with handle used to suction secretions from the mouth) was properly stored. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #19 had a filter (the air passes through a series of filters that remove impurities, ensuring that the oxygen delivered to the patient is of high quality) in the oxygen concentrator (take air from your surroundings, extract oxygen and filter it into purified oxygen for you to breathe). 3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #19's compartment that held the oxygen concentrator filter did not have white, fuzzy material. These failures could place residents at risk of respiratory complications or respiratory infection. Findings included: 1. Record review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for transmission-based precautions. (Resident #6 and Resident #9) The facility failed to isolate Resident #6 and Resident #9 after urine cultures (test checks urine for germs (microorganisms) that cause infections) revealed ESBL (enzymes break down and destroy some commonly used antibiotics) in their urine. This failure could place residents at risk for being exposed to health complications and infectious diseases. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #6's face sheet printed on 01/10/24 indicated Resident #6 was an [AGE] year-old female and admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including senile degeneration of brain (a progressive decline in a person's ability to think and remember can be due to a wide range of brain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2026-04-15 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to post the daily nurse staffing information with the current date, resident census, and numbers of staff actual hours worked at the beginning of each shift in a place readily accessible to residents and visitors for 2 of 3 days, in that: The facility failed to update and post the daily nurse staffing information on 04/14/2026 and 04/15/2026. This failure could affect residents, their families, and facility visitors by placing them at risk of not having access to information regarding staffing data and facility census. The findings included: An observation on 04/14/2026 at 9:30 a.m. revealed the daily nurse staffing pattern posted was from 04/13/2026. An observation on 04/15/2026 at 10:45 a.m. revealed the daily nurse staffing pattern posted was from 04/13/2026. An observation on 04/15/2026 at 2:00 p.m. revealed the daily nurse staffing pattern posted was from 0413/2026. During an interview on 04/15/2026 at 2:45 p.m., the DON stated the night nurse was responsible for changing the staffing posting each day and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$333,363 in federal fines across 4 penalties.
- $17,796 — penalty dated 2026-04-15
- $23,098 — penalty dated 2025-04-09
- $113,400 — penalty dated 2025-02-12
- $179,069 — penalty dated 2024-03-13
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to FOCUSED POST ACUTE CARE PARTNERS — 25 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 1.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.1 | -1.1 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 1.2 | +0.8 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.0 | ≈ chain avg |
The other 24 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.9★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| CHAMBERS COUNTY PUBLIC HOSPITAL DISTRICT NO. 1 | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 05/01/2021 |
| ABERNATHY, MARY | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | since 05/01/2024 |
| HUMPHREY, ERIC | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | since 05/01/2024 |
| LEGG, STEPHEN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | since 01/01/2024 |
| MCKENZIE, MARK | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/01/2021 |
| NEWTON, ELIZABETH | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 02/22/2024 |
| TINNERMAN, LINDA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | since 01/01/2024 |
| TURNER, LESLIE | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | since 01/01/2024 |
| COOPER, KIMBERLY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/29/2024 |
| FOCUSED POST ACUTE CARE PARTNERS LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/01/2021 |
| FOCUSED POST ACUTE CARE PARTNERS MANAGEMENT, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/01/2021 |
| FPACP LINDEN LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/01/2021 |
| BEASLEY, SHEILA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/01/2024 |
| CONLEY, SHAWN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/01/2021 |
| KENNEDY, KELCI | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/13/2025 |
| OKELLEY, EDWARD | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/01/2020 |
| PHILLIPS, JACQUELINE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/16/2025 |
| STRUBBE, LORETTA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/01/2021 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 32 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 78% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $157K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in TX
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 675293. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-15, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.