No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Focused Care of Waxahachie

1413 W Main St, Waxahachie, TX 75165 · Government - Hospital district · 152 certified beds · (972) 937-2298 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuse2 immediate-jeopardy citations1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$20,589 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited May 2026
  • inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (39) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $20,589 in federal fines (most recent 2026-03-02)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (59%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1305 W Jefferson St · (469) 800-9400 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
120 S Grand Ave Ste 1 · (972) 938-2642 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
610 Ferris Ave · (972) 937-1481 · Call to confirm hours
Park
S. Grand Ave. · (972) 937-7330 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1410 W Jefferson St · (972) 921-7198

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased19.3%15.8%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.5%3.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.3%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.3%0.8%2.0%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms1.3%2.4%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.5%3.3%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened18.9%14.0%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication19.0%18.0%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine91.4%98.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.1%3.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control14.5%13.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table4.1%9.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication3.9%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine69.2%88.0%79.4%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.792.171.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.052.061.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

10.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.31U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.14hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.15hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 50% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 32% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.8%CMS range 7.4–15.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.181.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.27
RN hours/ resident / day
1.03
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.38
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.68
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.28
RN hoursweekends
58.9%
Total nursing turnover
40.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 152 beds and averages 62.7 residents a day — about 41% occupied, or roughly 89 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.68 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.27 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.38 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.40 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.79 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.27 to 0.28 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 59% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

4
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-28)
5
at the previous standard inspection (2025-02-12)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

39 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 25 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-03-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate supervision, to the extent possible for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for safety.The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was provided adequate supervision on 02/08/2026 when Resident #1 pushed open a facility exit door, activating both the door alarm and Resident #1's wander guard alarm, and exited the facility traveling approximately 500 ft, crossing a street, and falling (no injuries). The facility was notified by a passerby driving a car of resident's elopement.The noncompliance was identified as Past Noncompliance. The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) began on 02/08/2026 and ended on 02/09/2026. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began.These failures could place residents at risk for avoidable accidents, injuries, and possible death.Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 02/26/2026, revealed a ninety-two-year-old male who was admitted to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, observations, and record review, the facility failed to protect Resident #2's right to be free from physical, mental, and verbal abuse by Resident #1. The facility failed to protect Resident #1 from abuse by Resident #2. Residents had an established and repeated facility wide known history of disputes, both verbal and attempted physical alterations. On 10/09/2024, both residents were in the same room unattended by staff and video footage revealed Resident #1 used his cane to hit Resident #2 on the head. Resident #2 was sent to the hospital by EMS and received 10 staples to his head for a 2 cm laceration. An IJ was identified on 10/12/24. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 1:45 PM. While the IJ was removed on 10/18/24, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of pattern and severity of no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy. This failure placed residents at risk for abuse, injuries, and pain. Findings included:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, observations, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that included measurable objectives and timetables to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for two (Resident #1 and Resident #2) of ten residents reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to implement a comprehensive care plan for Resident #1 and Resident #2 with attainable interventions in place addressing the repeated facility wide known history of disputes between the two Residents. An incident occurred on 10/09/24 where video footage revealed R#1 used his cane to hit Resident #2 on the head. Resident #2 was sent to the hospital by EMS and received 10 staples to his head for a 2 cm laceration. An IJ was identified on 10/16/24. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 12:48 PM. While the IJ was removed on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-04-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents for 1of 6 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents and supervision. The facility failed to ensure Resident # 1 was free from accidents. Resident # 1's leg was hit on a table by CNA A that resulted in a Tibial fracture to her right leg and was sent to the hospital for treatment services. The staff who caused the injury was moved to another hall. This failure placed residents at risk of being injured by CNA A. Findings included: Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old female was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Unspecified dementia (progressive or persistent loss of intellectual functioning, with impairment of memory and thinking), unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety. Record review of Resident's #1 quarterly MDS dated [DATE] reflected Resident #1 has a BIMS score of 3 indicating…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-23 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect 1 (Resident #1) of 7 residents reviewed for abuse and neglect in that:The facility failed to ensure Housekeeper A was not verbally aggressive with Resident # 1 on 05/22/2026.This failure could place residents at risk of emotional distress and psychosocial harm. Findings included:Record review of Resident #1's admission record dated 05/23/2026 documented a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 diagnoses included: major depressive disorder(mood disorder) essential primary hypertension (high blood pressure), and type 2 diabetes (body resist insulin or cannot produce enough of it).Record review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 05/11/2026, revealed the resident had a BIMS score of 15 which indicated the resident was cognitively intact.Record review of Resident #1's care plan, dated 05/23/2026, revealed Resident #1 was care planned for impaired coping r/t situational and social factors (social…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-04-28 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff and the public for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for environmental concerns. 1. The facility failed to repair a jagged lifted piece of metal with a pointed edge, which was present to the outside of the door, which opened to go out to the designated smoking area of the facility. 2. The facility failed to repair the magnet which was hanging out of the wall for the facility fire door which lead out of the dining room on the 400 hall. 3. The facility failed to repair or replace the door mechanism cover for the smoking door which lead from the sunroom resulting in exposed wiring and door mechanism at the top of the door. 4. The facility failed to repair or replace the loading dock door trim, which had a jagged piece of metal hanging from the door frame. 5. The facility failed to clean the mechanical lift body of the machine. 6. The facility failed to clean the facility handrails and inside the railing of the facility handrails. 7. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-28 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed ensure the resident had a right to personal privacy and confidentiality of his or her personal and medical records for 15 of 20 residents (Residents #12, #54,#13, #10, #6, #49, #27,#47, #30, #33, #69, #20, #21, #45 and #29) reviewed for privacy and confidentiality. 1. The facility failed to ensure Residents #47, #30, #33, #69, #20, #21, #45 and #29 vital sign information was not exposed and left on top of MA F's medication cart unattended on 04/26/26. 2. The facility failed to ensure resident/responsible party education, for Out on Pass signed documents, which documented resident names and responsible party name and signatures were not exposed on the receptionist front window counter for Residents #13, #!2 and #54 on 4/26/26. 3. The facility failed to ensure resident personal information which included names and prescribed medications was not exposed on a counter next to the copy machine in public hallways for Residents #12, #6, #49, #27 and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety in the facility's kitchen reviewed for dietary services. The facility failed to ensure food was labeled and dated correctly in the refrigerator, freezer, and pantry on 04/26/26. This failure could place residents at risk of foodborne illnesses. Observation of the kitchen on 04/26/26 at 9:18 AM revealed the following:There were 2 opened packages of French fries in the freezer that did not have any dates on them.There was a container with Jello (a sweet gelatin-based dessert made from animal derived gelatin) that had a preparation date of 04/01/26 and a used by date of 04/02/26 in the refrigerator that had not been thrown away.There was an opened loaf of bread in the pantry that had a manufacturer's date of 06/24/26 on it but did not have a delivery date or an open date on it.There were six loaves of bread in the pantry with a manufacturer's date 06/24/26 on them, but they did not have a delivery date on them.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-28 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to refer all level II residents and all residents with newly evident or possible serious mental disorder, intellectual disability, or a related condition for level II resident review upon a significant change in status assessment for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #6) reviewed for PASARR assessments. The facility failed to ensure Resident #6 was referred to the mental health authority after receiving a new diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder. This failure could place residents at risk for a diminished quality of life and not receiving needed care and services in accordance with individually assessed needs.Findings include: Record review of Resident #6's admission Record, dated 04/28/26, reflected an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident had diagnoses which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a lung disease characterized by chronic respiratory symptoms and airflow limitation), anxiety (intense, excessive,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for one (Resident #1) of six residents reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure staff practiced hand hygiene when entering and exiting Resident #1's room, who required enhanced barrier precautions. The failure put residents at risk for infection, hospitalization, and decreased quality of life.Findings included: Record review on 04/07/2026 at 2:35 PM Resident #1's electronic medical record revealed that Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE]. Resident #1 had a history of bipolar disorder (Mood swing), epilepsy (Seizure), GERD (Gastro Esophageal Reflux Disease - acid or food coming back up) Without Esophagitis, and adjustment disorder with anxiety. Full Code. BIMS score was at 12 (Mild cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designated to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infection for one (Resident #1) of six residents reviewed for infection control CNA A failed to cleanse the perineal area (vaginal area), change her gloves, wash her hands and dispose of the soiled brief in a designated container during incontinent care for Resident #1. This failure could place residents at risk of cross contamination which could result in infections or illness. Findings included:Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 1/13/2026 reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of unspecified dementia (a brain condition effecting memory and daily decision-making skills), anxiety disorder and heart failure. Record review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] reflected a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services which includes the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing and administering of medications to meet the needs for one resident (Resident #1) of 6 residents reviewed for pharmacy services, in that: 1) The facility failed to administer medications correctly on 10/3/2025 at 6:00 am.2) The facility failed to administer medications correctly on 10/3/2025 at 4:00 pm.3) The facility failed to administer medications correctly on 10/5/2025 at 8:00 am This failure placed residents at risk for medical errors, complications, decreased quality of life and hospitalization.Findings included:Review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 10/16/2025 reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: type 2 diabetes (blood sugar disorder), hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (breathing disorder), hypertension (high blood pressure), seizures (temporary episode of abnormal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and records review, the facility failed to ensure that medical records were accurately documented for one (Resident #1) of eight (8) residents reviewed for accurate clinical records, in that: The facility failed to ensure assessments for Resident #1 were documented in the medical record after he was discovered with ants on him while lying in bed on 10/22/2025. This deficient practice could result in errors in care and treatment and violate resident rights.Findings included: Review of face sheet dated 10/24/2025 revealed a 65-yer-old man with an initial admission date of 6/10/2022 and a recent admission date of 3/27/2025 with diagnoses that included hemiplegia and hemiparesis (paralysis and weakness on one side of the body), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD - group of breathing disorders), Type 2 diabetes (blood sugar disorder) sepsis (infection throughout the body) and dementia (memory disorder). Review also revealed Resident #1's RP and POA was listed as his FM.Review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-09 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately notify the residents' representative of the changes in the resident's physical and mental health for one (Resident #1) of seven residents reviewed for notification of changes. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's RP was notified when he was found with ants on him while lying in bed on 10/22/2025. This failure placed residents at risk of a decreased quality of life and risk of not having their responsible party represent them in medical and care decisions.Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 10/24/2025 revealed a 65-yer-old man with an initial admission date of 6/10/2022 and a recent admission date of 3/27/2025 with diagnoses that included hemiplegia and hemiparesis (paralysis and weakness on one side of the body), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD - group of breathing disorders), Type 2 diabetes (blood sugar disorder) sepsis (infection throughout the body) and dementia (memory disorder). Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 25 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-01 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 residents reviewed for environment. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was provided clean bed linens that were in good condition. This failure placed residents at risk of living in an uncomfortable environment leading to a diminished quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included Diabetes Mellitus with Diabetic Nephropathy (elevated blood sugar that has caused kidney damage) and constipation. Record review of Resident #1's Baseline Care Plan, dated 06/17/2025, reflected Resident #1 was dependent for transferring from chair to bed and bed to chair, toileting hygiene, showering and bathing, and lower and upper body dressing. The care plan reflected Resident #1 was always…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-01 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for ADLs. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 received showers on 06/18/2025, 06/23/2025, 06/27/2025, and 06/30/2025. This failure could place residents at risk of not being provided care and assistance when needed. Findings Included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included Diabetes Mellitus with Diabetic Nephropathy (elevated blood sugar that has caused kidney damage) and constipation. Record review of Resident #1's Baseline Care Plan, dated 06/17/2025, reflected Resident #1 was dependent for transferring from chair to bed and bed to chair, toileting hygiene, showering, bathing, lower and upper body dressing. The care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-12 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide residents with an ongoing resident centered activity program, designed to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of 3 (Residents #25, #31, and #42) of 8 residents reviewed for activities. The facility failed to provide activities as scheduled from January 23, 2025, through February 12, 2025. This failure placed residents at risk of boredom, depression, isolation, and a diminished quality of life. Findings include: Record review of Resident #25's face undated sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old male initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with the following diagnoses: Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (a chronic disease that causes a person's blood glucose levels to rise too high) Chronic Pulmonary Edema (a condition where fluid accumulates in lung tissues, making it difficult to breathe), Acute Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia (acute impairment in gas exchange between…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-12 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 1 (Resident #12) of 8 residents who were reviewed for accuracy of assessments. The facility failed to ensure Resident #12's MDS assessment accurately reflected his hearing ability and use of hearing aids. This failure could place residents at risk of their needs going unmet. Findings included: Record review of Resident #12's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], indicated Resident #12 was a [AGE] year-old male, who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. He had diagnoses of dementia, major depressive disorder, depression, hereditary and idiopathic neuropathy (nervous system disorders that interfere with normal nerve function). His MDS reflected he had minimal difficulty with his ability to hear, (difficulty in some environments (e.g., when person speaks softly or setting is noisy), as well as that he did not have hearing aids or other hearing appliances. His BIMS score…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-12 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide accurate PASRR screenings for individuals with a mental disorder for 2 (Resident #16 and Resident #52) of 14 residents reviewed for PASSAR assessments. Resident #16 did not have a new PASSAR level I screening completed or a PASSAR level II screening completed although a diagnosis of mental illness was diagnosed after the admission date. Resident #52 did not have an accurate PASSAR Level 1 screening after Resident #52 was admitted with a negative PASSAR Level 1 screening but had a mental illness. These failures could place all residents who had a mental illness or intellectual or developmental disability at risk for not receiving needed assessment, care, and services to meet their needs. Findings Included: Record review of Resident #165's Face Sheet indicated the resident was a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility with an original admission date of 02/06/2015., an initial admission date of 06/10/2022, and an admission date of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident care plan accurately reflected the resident's status for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #12) who were reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to care plan Resident #12's use of hearing aids. This failure could place residents at risk of their needs going unmet. Findings included: Record review of Resident #12's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], indicated Resident #12 was a [AGE] year-old male, who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. He had diagnoses of dementia, major depressive disorder, depression, hereditary and idiopathic neuropathy (nervous system disorders that interfere with normal nerve function). His MDS also reflected in Section B Hearing, Speech, and Vision that Resident #12's ability to hear, had minimal difficulty, as well as that he did not have hearing aids or other hearing appliances. His BIMS score was 12, which indicated moderately impaired cognition. Record review of Resident #12's care plan dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-12 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that drugs and biologicals used in the facility were stored properly for 1of 2 medication storage rooms (room located by Hall 300). The facility failed to ensure expired medication administration supplies were removed from the medication room located by hall 300. These failures could place residents at risk for ineffective treatments, intravenous catheter dislodgements and infections. Findings include: Observation on 2/11/25 at 10:30 AM of the Hall 300 Medication Storage Room revealed the following: 8 Zyno IV Administration sets expired 3/19/2023. 7 Zyno IV Administration sets expired 6/20/2022 1 Stat lock PICC PLUS Catheter stabilizer expired 4/28/2023. 1 Central Line Dressing Kit expired 2/28/2021. In an interview on 2/12/25 at 12:48 PM LVN-A stated, the policy on expired medical supplies was to take them back to medical records department where they get rid of them. She stated the nurses, and the medication aides were responsible for checking the rooms. She said this was important because the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-20 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received services in the facility with reasonable accommodations of each resident's needs for 4 of 13 residents (Residents #2, #3, #4, & #5) reviewed for resident rights in that: The facility failed to ensure Residents #2, #3, #4, & #5's call light was within reach on 12/20/24. This failure could affect residents who needed assistance with activities of daily living and could result in needs not being met. Findings included: 1.Record review of Resident #2's admission record dated 12/20/24 documented a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE]. Resident #2 had diagnoses which included: acute cystitis with hematuria (a bladder infection that results with blood in the urine), major depressive disorder severe with psychotic symptoms (a mental illness that involves depression and a loss of touch with reality, or psychosis), anxiety disorder (a mental health condition that causes a person to experience excessive and intense…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, which included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs for 2 of 13 residents (Residents #1, and #5) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to revise Resident #1's care plan to reflect an unwitnessed fall out of bed on 12/11/24 and 12/14/24. The facility failed to revise Resident #5's care plan to reflect interventions for nutritional impairment, behavior problem, and resistive to care that was initiated on 11/20/24. This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk of not receiving appropriate interventions to meet their current needs. Findings Included: 1. Record review of Resident #1's admission record dated 12/20/24 documented a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included: unspecified fall (sudden movement…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-07 · tag F0552 — pattern
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were informed in advance, by the physician or other practitioner or professional, of the risks and benefits of proposed care, of treatment and treatment alternatives or treatment options and to choose the alternative or option he prefers for one (Resident #1) of four residents reviewed for consents. The facility failed to obtain a written consent from Resident #1 before administering the following psychoactive medications: Risperdal (anti-psychotic), Paroxetine (anti-depressant) , Depakote (mood stabilizer , Nudexta (anti-depressant), Quetiapine (antipsychotic), Lorazepam (anti-anxiety). This failure placed residents who received psychoactive medications at risk for not understanding the risks and dangerous side effects of psychoactive medications without their opportunity for informed consent and opportunity to refuse the drug. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 9/23/2024 reflected a [AGE] year-old male who…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility did not provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident for one (Resident #1) of four residents reviewed for pharmaceutical services, in that: The facility failed to ensure they had enough Depakote medication (mood stabilizer medication) on hand from 3/20/2024 to 4/10/2024 for Resident #1. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of not receiving the intended therapeutic benefit of the medications and could result in worsening or exacerbation of chronic medical conditions, and hospitalization. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 9/23/2024 reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder (mood disorder), Traumatic Brain Injury (injury to the brain), malignant neoplasm of prostate (prostate cancer), ataxia (impaired coordination), and gout (form of arthritis which causes joint swelling and pain). Resident #1 was his own responsible…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-29 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received services in the facility with reasonable accommodations of each resident's needs for 2 of 7 residents (Residents #1 & #2) reviewed for resident rights in that: The facility failed to ensure Residents #1 and #2 call lights was within reach on 10/29/24. This failure could affect residents who needed assistance with activities of daily living and could result in needs not being met. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's admission record dated 10/29/24 documented a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE]. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included: sepsis (serious condition in which the body responds improperly to an infection), major depressive disorder (persistent low mood and loss of interest in activities that people enjoy), muscle weakness (lack of muscle strength), and gastro esophageal reflux disease without esophagitis (a digestive disorder that occurs when stomach acid flows back into the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-29 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for a clean and homelike environment. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3's urinal was emptied appropriately on 10/29/24. This failure placed residents at risk of decreased feelings of self-worth and a diminished quality of life. Findings included: A record review of Resident #3's face sheet dated 10/29/24 reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #3's diagnoses included osteomyelitis (serious bone infection that causes inflammation and swelling in the bone), Unspecified dementia (loss of cognitive functioning to the extent that it interferes with a person's daily life and activities), major depressive disorder (persistent low mood and loss of interest in activities that people enjoy), Type 2 diabetes mellitus with foot ulcer (open sore that can develop on the foot of someone with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-18 · tag F0660 — isolated
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide and document sufficient preparation and orientation to residents to ensure safe and orderly transfer or discharge from the facility for one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for transfer and discharge rights, in that: The facility failed to provide documentation that Resident #1 received sufficient preparation and orientation when he was discharged to a group home to ensure a safe discharge. Resident #1 was discharged from the facility on 10/11/24. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving care and services to meet their needs upon discharge. Findings Included: Review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 10/11/24, reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included diffuse traumatic brain injury (occurs when the brain is injured by blunt force, causing the brain's nerve fibers to shear of tear), depression and heart failure. Resident #1 is listed as his own responsible…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan of each resident that included measurable objectives and timetables to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs for three (Residents #3, #4 and #5) out of eleven residents reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for Resident #3, #4 and #5 in order to provide care in that: Resident #3's care plan was blank, Resident #4's care plan was incomplete and had only one intervention for vaccine status, Resident #5's care plan was incomplete and had only two interventions for code status and alertness. This failure placed residents at risk of not having their individualized needs met in a timely manner and communicated to providers which could result in injury or a decline in physical well-being. Findings included: Review of Resident #3's face sheet dated 3/26/2024 reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that all drugs and biologicals were properly stored and inaccessible to unauthorized staff and residents for one resident (Resident #2) of four residents reviewed for medication storage. The facility failed to ensure narcotics were received and then stored in a manner to prevent diversion on 03/04/2024 when a refill of Hydrocodone, 10-325 milligrams, quantity of 75, for Resident #2 was received from the pharmacy by LVN A, given to LVN B on 3/4/2024 and discovered missing on 03/06/2024. This failure could place residents at risk for drug diversion and access to medications that could cause harm, sickness, or hospitalization. Findings included: Review of Resident #2's face sheet dated 3/26/2024 reflected an eighty-three-year-old male admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Senile Degeneration of Brain (gradual loss of thinking ability), Hypertension (high blood pressure), Dementia (progressive loss of intellectual functioning), Shoulder…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-12-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to store foods properly and maintain a sanitized food preparation area for the facility's only kitchen, which was reviewed for dietary services. The facility failed: 1. The facility failed to properly seal, label, and date food containers in the facility's freezer. 2. The facility failed to properly defrost food at the appropriate temperature. 3. The facility failed to utilize plates that were free from chips. 4. The facility failed to monitor and maintain the appropriate sanitizer concentration the facility's only dishwashing system. 5. The facility failed to maintain clean kitchen equipment and appliances. These failures placed residents at risk of exposure to food borne pathogens. Findings include: Observations on 12-19-2023 at 9:00 AM reflected one clear plastic bag of frozen onion rings that was closed with a knot WLD and one clear plastic bag of frozen dinner rolls onion rings that was closed with a knot WLD. There was a sign on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-12-21 · tag F0882 — widespread
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a person designated as the infection preventionist worked at least part-time at the facility for 1 of 1 Infection Preventionist reviewed. The facility did not have an infection preventionist in place who worked at least part-time at the facility. The DON was the infection preventionist and did not work at least part-time in the position at the facility. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of cross contamination and infection. Findings included: During an interview on 12/19/23 at 9:35 AM with the ADM, he stated the DON was the infection preventionist for the facility. During an interview on 12/21/23 at 11:22 AM with the ADON, she stated she had completed the IP training but only helped with IP duties if needed. During an interview on 12/20/23 at 11:52 AM with the DON, she stated she was the infection preventionist. She stated the previous ADON had been the IP, but she no longer worked at the facility and had been gone about three or four weeks. She stated she works as the DON usually about nine…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 (Resident #43) of 3 residents reviewed for accidents, hazards, and supervision. The facility failed to ensure safe smoking for Resident #43 when he had a lighter and cigarettes in his possession, outside of scheduled smoking hours unsupervised. This failure could place residents who smoke at risk of harm. Findings included: Record review of Resident #43's face sheet dated 09/02/22, reflected he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (refers to a group of diseases that affect how the body uses blood sugar) with Diabetic Autonomic (Poly-multiple) Neuropathy (nerve damage), Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease (occurs when stomach acid repeatedly flows back into the tube connecting your mouth and stomach) without Esophagitis (inflammation of the tube connecting your mouth and stomach), Other Dental Procedure Status, and Dry…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-21 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that the medication error rate was not five percent or greater. The facility had a medication error rate of 8.57%, based on 3 errors out of 35 opportunities, which involved 1 (Residents #46) of 3 residents reviewed for medication errors. LVN E failed to administer medication by mouth as ordered and gave medications via gastrostomy (stomach) tube. These failures could place residents at risk of inadequate therapeutic outcomes. Findings included: Record review of Resident #46's undated Face Sheet reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Parkinson's (a disorder of the central nervous system that affects movement), unspecified protein malnutrition, generalized anxiety disorder, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and adult failure to thrive. Record review of Resident #46's Significant change in status MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected the resident had a BIMS score of 15 indicating the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-21 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure that residents are free of significant medications error for 1 of (Resident #46) of 3 residents reviewed for medications errors. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #46's medications were given as ordered by the physician. This failure placed all resident who received medications at risk of not getting their medications as ordered which could result in resident not receiving the therapeutic benefits of the medication and decreased quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #46's undated Face Sheet reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Parkinson's (a disorder of the central nervous system that affects movement), unspecified protein malnutrition, generalized anxiety disorder, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and adult failure to thrive. Record review of Resident #46's Significant change in status MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected the resident had a BIMS score…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-21 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's medical record included documentation that indicated the resident either received the pneumococcal immunization or did not receive the pneumococcal immunization due to medical contraindication or refusal for 2 of 5 residents (Residents #23 and Resident #63) reviewed for influenza and pneumococcal immunizations. The facility failed to document pneumococcal immunizationstatus for Resident #23 and Resident #63. These failures could place residents at risk for contracting a viral disease and cause respiratory complications and potential adverse health outcomes. Findings included: Review of Resident #23's undated face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body), congestive heart failure (progressive heart disease that affects pumping action of the heart muscles), hypertension (high blood pressure), cerebral infarction (stroke), aphasia…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-21 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to be adequately equipped to allow residents to call for staff assistance through a communication system, which relays the call directly to a staff member or to a centralized staff work area, for 1 of 6 residents (RES #59) who were observed for access to facility services. The facility failed to ensure RES #59 had access to a functioning call light button. This failure could place residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings include: Record review of RES #59's AR reflected she was an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. She was diagnosed with Moderate Vascular Dementia (which resulted in problematic reasoning, planning, judgement, memory, and other thought processes) and Cognitive Communication deficit (which resulted with difficulty in thought and how she used language.) Record review of RES #59's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 11/29/2023, reflected Section C0500, Cognitive Patterns, indicated RES #59 had a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-30 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident and the resident's representative(s)were notified of the transfer or discharge and the reasons for the move in writing and in a language and manner they understood, and the facility failed to ensure the a copy of the notice was sent to a representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman for one of six residents (Resident #1) reviewed for discharges. The facility failed to provide a 30-day discharge notice as soon as practicable to Resident #1's RP and the ombudsman. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving care and services to meet their needs upon discharge, a disruption of care, and being discharged without alternate placement. Findings include: Record review of Resident #1's, undated, face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old male was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included ataxia (poor muscle control), cognitive communication deficit (difficulty paying attention to a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-30 · tag F0624 — isolated
    Prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide and document sufficient preparation and orientation to residents to ensure safe and orderly transfer or discharge from the facility for one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for transfer and discharge rights, in that: The facility failed to make arrangements for safe and orderly discharge through care planning and involving the RP (Representative) for Resident #1. This failure placed residents at risk of not receiving care and services to meet their needs upon discharge. Findings Included: Review of Resident #1's undated face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old male was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of ataxia (poor muscle control), cognitive communication deficit (difficulty paying attention to a conversation, staying on topic, remembering information, or responding accurately), type 2 diabetes mellitus (blood sugar is too high), hyperlipidemia (excess of lipids or fats in your blood), bipolar disorder (Mental illness…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$20,589 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $12,428 — penalty dated 2026-03-02
  • $8,161 — penalty dated 2024-03-27

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to FOCUSED POST ACUTE CARE PARTNERS — 25 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 51.9-0.9 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.1-0.1 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.2-0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.0≈ chain avg
The other 24 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.9★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
FOCUSED POST ACUTE CARE PARTNERS LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2017
FPACP ELLIS LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/01/2017
CONLEY, SHAWNIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/01/2017
MCKENZIE, MARKIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/01/2017
STRUBBE, LORETTAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2018
FOCUSED POST ACUTE CARE PARTNERS MANAGEMENT, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2017
ANDERSON, DANTRELLIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/30/2025
LEEK, DUSTINIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2024
WHITE, KASEYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/20/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$5.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-16.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$268K
Related-party expense4% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 82%Medicare 6%Other / private 12%

About 82% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $268K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$270per resident / day
operating cost
$8,214per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$232per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Texas
$5,627/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,666/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 455591. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-28, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next