Focused Care At Orange

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 54 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 47.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 38 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 22% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 110.3 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.03 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.19 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.71 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.56 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.23 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.24 to 0.08 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 41% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

28 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · K2025-04-25 · tag F0700 — pattern
  Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure correct installation, use, and maintenance of bed rails, for 3 of 7 residents (Residents #70, #87, and #102) reviewed for bed rails. The facility did not have the manufacturers' recommendations and specifications to follow for installing and maintaining the bed rails to prevent large gap in Resident #70's bed rail. The facility failed to develop care plans to address the risk of entrapment and interventions to prevent entrapment due to the use of bed rails for the residents who had histories of falling out of the bed for Residents #70, #87, and #102 The facility did not follow their Bed Mobility Assessments indicating the bed rails were not recommended for use for Residents #70, #87, and #102. The facility did not provide maintenance and monitoring of the bed rails per the manufacturer specifications/recommendations for residents with bed rails. The facility failed to maintain a copy of a manufacturer manual available for reference.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-04-16 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of any significant medication errors for 1 of 4 (Resident #1) residents reviewed for medication errors. 1. The facility failed to administer Resident #1 the appropriate dose of morphine. Resident #1 was administered 1ml (20mg) of morphine every 3 minutes from 11:15 a.m. to 11:39 a.m. (180mg) instead of 1ml (20mg) every 30 minutes. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's morphine order was properly transcribed. The non-compliance was identified as past non-compliance. The Immediate Jeopardy began on [DATE] and ended on [DATE]. The facility had corrected the non-compliance before the survey began. This failure could place residents at risk for harm or death relating to being administered too much medication. Finding Include: 1. Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated [DATE] indicated she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's Disease (progressive…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-01-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, which included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 of 17 residents (Resident #5) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #5's care plan ADL interventions were implemented on 09/22/24 resulting in serious injury. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was identified on 01/23/25 at 3:23 p.m. While the IJ was removed on 01/24/25 at 6:37 p.m., the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated with the potential for more than minimal harm, due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems. This failure could place residents at risk for staff not being aware of the resident needs and not receiving the care and services to attain or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-01-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation , interview and record review the facility failed to provide supervision and assistance devices to prevent accident for 1 of 17 (Resident #5) residents reviewed for accidents/supervision. The facility failed to ensure CNA C provided ADL care with 2 person assistance. Resident #5 fell out of her bed and sustained a fractured left femur during care on 09/22/24. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was identified on 01/23/25 at 3:23 p.m. While the IJ was removed on 01/24/25 at 6:37 p.m., the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated with the potential for more than minimal harm, due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems. This failure could place residents at risk of accidents and injuries. Findings include: Record review of Resident #5's face sheet indicated a [AGE] year old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE] (initially admitted on [DATE]). Resident #5 had diagnoses which included unspecified convulsions (seizures), displaced…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-06-03 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 3 of 3 medication carts and 3 of 25 residents reviewed for pharmacy services (Residents #42, #61 and #64) (Medication cart for Rooms 109 - Rooms 120, Medication cart for Rooms 217 - Rooms 220 and Medication cart for Rooms 205 - Rooms 216 ).The facility failed to ensure expired medications were removed from 3 of 3 medication carts.These failures could place residents at an increased risk of receiving medications that were not at their intended potency and potential adverse reactions or side effects. Findings included:Record review of Resident #42's face sheet, dated 06/23/2026, indicated a [AGE] year-old female, admitted [DATE]. Resident #42 had diagnoses which included hypertension (high blood pressure) and hypothyroidism (thyroid does not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for food safety requirements. 1. The facility failed to ensure there were paper towels at the handwashing station.2. The facility failed to ensure the Dietary Manager's hair was inside the hair restraint.3. The facility failed to ensure Dishwasher A wore a beard restraint.4. The facility failed to ensure [NAME] A wore his beard restraint correctly.5. The facility failed to ensure the Dietary Manager, and [NAME] A washed their hands upon entering the kitchen.6. The facility failed to ensure [NAME] B washed her hands after lifting her shirt up and pulling her pants up.7. The facility failed to ensure the floor and shelves of the walk-in coolers were free from green and brown colored debris and dark brown stains.8. The facility failed to ensure 2 log packs of ground beef meat were thawed with running water.9. The facility failed to ensure staff did not have open hydration drinks on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-03 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean and comfortable homelike environment for 1 of 3 halls (Hall 100) and 1 of 22 occupied rooms on Hall 100 (room [ROOM NUMBER]) reviewed for a homelike environment. 1.The facility failed to provide a comfortable home-like living room area at the end of Hall 100 with unbroken end table and chairs without stains. 2.The facility failed to ensure the 2 over bed tables in an occupied resident room (#101) were in good repair and did not have lose trim on 1 over bed table and areas of missing laminate on the other over bed table. The failure could place residents at risk for an uncomfortable, unhomelike environment, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included:During an observation on 06/01/2026 at 9:30 a.m., the living room at the end of Hall 100 had 2 fabric chairs with discolored stained areas on the seat cushion approximately 5 inches on the first chair and the next chair had several 2-inch discolored spots on the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-03 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who need respiratory care were provided with such care, consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 25 residents (Resident #5) reviewed for respiratory care. The facility did not ensure Resident #5's oxygen concentrator was set at 3 LPM on 06/02/26 at 8:43 a.m. as ordered. This failure could place residents who required respiratory care at risk of not receiving proper care and treatment and decreased quality of life. Findings included:Record review of the admission record indicated Resident #5 was admitted on [DATE] and was [AGE] years old with diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a disease which makes it hard to breathe in and out) and high blood pressure. Record review of physician orders dated May 2026 indicated Resident #5 had an order for oxygen at 3 LPM per concentration via nasal cannula continuous. Record review of care plan dated 03/06/2026 indicated Resident #5 had oxygen…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-18 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure it's free of any significant medication errors for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for significant medication errors. The facility failed to identify Resident #1 medication allergy to Hydrocodone and Resident #1 was administered 10 doses of Hydrocodone. This failure could place residents at risk for having allergic reactions such as skin rashes, itching, or swelling if given medications they are allergic to. Findings included: Record Review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 10/6/2025 indicated Resident #1 was a 78- year- old female initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of Pain, Hyperlipidemia (high levels of fat in the blood.), and Primary Hypertension (high blood pressure). Record review of Resident #1's Care plan dated 04/22/2025 indicated Resident #1 had Codeine, Diazepam, Sulfa Antibiotics, Tramadol, Caffeine, Adhesive listed as her allergies with Review listed allergies prior to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-25 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with limited range of motion received appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion and/or to prevent further decrease in range of motion for 1 of 24 residents reviewed for range of motion. (Resident #48) The facility failed to maintain Resident #48's contractures of the left hand. The resident did not have a palmar cushion (a soft, padded device used to support and protect the palm of the hand and reduce finger flexion contractures) in place to his left hand daily to maintain ROM and prevent a decline on 04/07/25 at 9:30 a.m and 2:30 p.m. and on 04/08/25 at 8:00 a.m This failure could place the residents at risk for not receiving the care and services to maintain their highest level of well-being. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 04/08/25 indicated Resident #48 was [AGE] years old and admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food under sanitary conditions in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for dietary services. The facility failed to ensure all staff wore hair restraints while working inside the kitchen. The facility failed to ensure the fryer was clean and free from brown crusty particles in the fryer baskets above the open cooking oil and brown and black particles along the side ledges and large front ledge surrounding the open oil. These failures could place residents who ate meals prepared in the kitchen at risk of foodborne illnesses. Findings included: During observation and interview on 04/06/25 during initial tour of the kitchen at 08:30 a.m. the following was observed: * [NAME] H was observed standing between the stove and counters without a hair restraint covering her hair. She reached into her pocket and got her hair covering and began putting it on while tucking stray strands of hair underneath the covering. She said she had been washing dishes and had gotten hot and sweaty and took her…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-25 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were incontinent of bowel and bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #100) reviewed for incontinent Care. The facility failed to ensure that CNA F did not wipe Resident #100's perineal (area between the legs) area from back to front while providing incontinent care on 04/07/2025. This failure could place the residents at risk of cross-contamination and development of urinary tract infections. Findings included: Record review of face sheet, dated 04/07/2025, indicated Resident #100 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] with a urinary tract infection. Record review of quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #100 was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 15 and was always incontinent for bladder and bowel. Record review of comprehensive care plan dated 01/27/2025 indicated Resident #100 required extensive assistance…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored and labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles on 1 of 3 medication carts observed. (Hall 100 Rooms 109 - 120 medication cart) observed in that: LVN B was not aware of a loose pill and scattered debris, powdery and sticky substance in the bottom of the Hall 100 medication cart drawers and did not remove the loose pill or clean scattered debris, powdery and sticky substance in the medication drawers. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving prescribed drugs or contaminated medication. Findings included: During an observation and interview on 04/08/25 at 8:45 a.m., during review of the Hall 100 medication cart with LVN B, she said she was giving patient medication off this cart today. The cart review revealed the 3rd drawer contained 1 loose unidentified pill that was not labeled and not sealed in packaging, scattered debris from medication card pill packs, and a whitish brown powdery substance with sugar like crystals scattered…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-25 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to coordinate assessments with the PASRR program, including incorporating the recommendations from the PASRR evaluation report into a resident's care planning for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for PASRR assessments. (Resident #1) The facility did not provide and arrange for a specialized customized manual wheelchair for Resident #1 as recommended and agreed upon by the IDT within the time frame set by PASRR. This failure could place residents who are PASRR positive at risk of not receiving the necessary services/DME that would enhance their quality of life. Findings included: Record review of a face sheet dated 03/24/2025 indicated Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old male initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. His diagnoses included moderate intellectual disabilities (condition that affects a person's ability to learn and function at an expected level), developmental disorder of speech and language (communication…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$193,434 in federal fines across 3 penalties.

• $102,448 — penalty dated 2025-04-25
• $17,641 — penalty dated 2025-04-16
• $73,345 — penalty dated 2025-01-24

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to FOCUSED POST ACUTE CARE PARTNERS — 25 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 31 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 78% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $395K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX