Focused Care at Fort Stockton

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

36.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 27 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 30% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 23% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 65.4 residents a day — about 55% occupied, or roughly 55 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.61 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.22 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.51 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.35 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.72 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.21 to 0.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2023-08-11 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to immediately consult with the resident's physician of a significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status; a need to alter treatment significantly (a need to discontinue an existing form of treatment due to adverse consequences, or to commence a new form of treatment) for two (Resident #1 and #2) of three residents reviewed for Notification of Changes. The facility failed to notify the physician of Resident #1's wound care consultant's recommendation of a doppler study six (6 ) times on [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], and [DATE] and a recommendation to refer to a vascular doctor/ podiatrist/ or orthopedic doctor five (5) times on [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], and [DATE], resulting in a right below knee amputation on [DATE]. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on [DATE] at 2:55 p.m. While the IJ was removed on [DATE] at 12:25 p.m. the facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of actual harm and a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-08-11 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to be free from neglect for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for neglect (Resident #1). The facility failed to ensure that the Treatment Nurse made the referral for a doppler study six times on [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], and [DATE], or an orthopedic/ podiatrist/ and/or a vascular doctor five times on [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], and [DATE]). This resulted in Resident #1 having a below the knee amputation on [DATE]. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was identified on [DATE] at 2:55 p.m. While the IJ was removed on [DATE] at 12:43 p.m., the facility remained out of compliance at actual harm with a potential for more than minimal harm at a scope of isolated, due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems. These failures placed residents at risk for negative outcomes including decline in wounds, dismemberment, severe infection, and death. Findings included: Review…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · J2023-08-11 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident with pressure ulcers received the necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility failed to ensure the Treatment Nurse accurately transcribed the Wound Care Consultant's recommendation for Resident #1 to have a doppler study six (6) times on [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], and [DATE] and/or see a vascular/orthopedic/ podiatrist doctor five (5) times on [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], and [DATE]. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's physician was notified of the Wound Care Consultant's recommendations. The facility failed to ensure the recommended actions were followed through with. This resulted in Resident #1 having a below the knee amputation on [DATE]. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was identified on [DATE] at 2:55 PM.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-01 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident resided and received services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for 1 of 3 (Resident #2) residents reviewed for accommodation of needs. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 had their call light within reach. This failure could place residents at risk for not having their needs or preferences met. Findings included:Review of Resident #2's admission Record, dated 4/1/26, revealed she was a [AGE] year-old female originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including End Stage Renal Disease and need for assistance with personal care. Review of Resident #2's Significant Change MDS Assessment, dated 3/27/26, revealed a BIMS of 9 on indicating she was moderately cognitively impaired and showed no signs of delirium. She needed set-up or stand by assistance with toileting and was frequently incontinent of bladder and occasionally incontinent of bowel. The MDS…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for dietary services.The facility failed on 3.24.26 to seal and date food items stored in refrigerator.This failure could place residents at risk for food contamination and foodborne illness. Findings included:During observations on 3.24.26 at 9:45 am to 10:45 am, during initial tour of the kitchen: Observation of the following stored in dry storage room:Large bag of white onions sitting directly on the floor.Four bread products sitting on top of the oven, not covered. Observation of the following stored in the refrigerator:Container with 37 cups of tea and ice filled, not covered.Container of ham and cheese sandwiches not covered.Package of ham not dated and opened. Observation of the following stored in the freezer:Box of yellow corn kernels opened and not covered.Bag of meat, not labeled and not dated.During an interview on 3.24.26 at 10:35 a.m., the DM stated all items in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level I assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for one (Resident #44) of three residents reviewed for PASRR Level 1 screenings. The facility failed to ensure the accuracy of the PASRR Level 1 Screening for Resident #44. The PASRR Level 1 Screening dated 12/17/25 did not indicate a diagnosis of mental illness, although the diagnosis post-traumatic stress was present upon Resident #44's admission on [DATE]. This failure could place residents with mental illness at risk of not receiving a PASRR Evaluation, individualized care, or special services to meet their needs. Findings included: A record review of Resident #44's face sheet, dated 03/26/2026, revealed a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included post-traumatic stress disorder chronic (a mental health condition triggered by experiencing or witnessing traumatic events), anxiety…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan to meet resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 of 10 residents (Residents #44) reviewed for care plans. The facility did not develop Resident #44's care plan related to diagnosis of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder. These failures could place residents at risk for unmet care needs and decreased quality of care.Findings included: A record review of Resident #44's face sheet, dated 03/26/2026, revealed a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included post-traumatic stress disorder chronic (a mental health condition triggered by experiencing or witnessing traumatic events, PTSD), anxiety disorder, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a lung disease limiting air flow from the lungs). A record review of Resident #44's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needs respiratory care was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 (Resident #54) of 11 residents observed for oxygen management. Resident #54 were on oxygen and did not have NO SMOKING sign posted outside of the bedroom. This failure could place residents on oxygen therapy at risk of receiving incorrect or inadequate oxygen support and decline in health. Resident #54Record review of Resident #54's admission Record dated 3.26.26 revealed an admission on 3.18.25 with a diagnosis of chronic pulmonary edema (a long-term condition where fluid accumulates in the lungs leading to persistent breathing difficulties and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (progressive lung disease that makes it difficult to breathe). Record review of Resident #54's Comprehensive MDS dated 12.12.25 revealed a BIMS score of 7, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Section J1100 was marked for shortness of breath. Record review of Resident #54's orders initiated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure in accordance with professional standards of practice, the medical records on each resident were accurately and completely documented for 1 of 13 residents (Resident #58) reviewed for accurate medical records. The facility failed to ensure correct and complete documentation for Resident #58 who was placed in the secure unit on 5.19.25. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the care and services needed due to inaccurate or incomplete clinical records.Record review of Resident #58's admission Record, dated 3.26.26, revealed a [AGE] year-old male, admitted 5.9.25, with a diagnosis of unspecified dementia (used when a patient shows clear signs of cognitive decline or impairment, but a specific cause cannot be determined). Record review of Resident #58's MDS Assessment, dated 1.13.26, revealed a BIMs score of 6, indicating severe cognitive impairment and problems with thinking and memory. Record review of Resident #58's Care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to help prevent the development and transmission of disease and infection to include hand washing and enhanced precautions for 3 residents (Residents #1, #2, and #3) of 7 reviewed for infection control.The facility failed to place an Enhanced Barrier Precautions sign outside of Residents #1, #2, and #3's door on 3.24.26.This failure could place residents at risk for cross-contamination and the spread of infection.Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 3.26.26, revealed a [AGE] year-old female, admitted 2.4.25, with a diagnosis of end stage renal disease, type 2 diabetes, and hypertension.Record review of Resident #1's Comprehensive MDS, dated 2.26.26, revealed a BIMS score of 5, indicating severe cognitive deficiency.Record review of Resident #2's face sheet, dated 3.26.26, revealed a [AGE] year-old male, admitted 10.20.21, with a diagnosis of Gangrene, hypertension, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-14 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to be free from abuse or neglect, for 1 of 8 residents (Residents #46) and 5 of 5 residents in the surveyor's confidential resident group meeting reviewed for abuse and neglect. The facility failed to ensure staff did not talk ugly to residents in the resident council meeting or make residents feel bullied (Resident #46). The facility failed to ensure staff did not talk ugly to residents, did not shun the resident when the staff thought resident made a complaint against the the staff, or played favorites with the residents This failure could place residents at risk for emotional distress, fear, decreased quality of life and further abuse. Findings included: Review of Resident #46's admission Record, dated 11/12/24, revealed she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including depression and diabetes mellitus. Review of Resident #46's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 10/4/24 revealed:…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-11-14 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, and record review, the failed to implement their written abuse prevention policy and investigate allegations for 2 of 11 Residents (Residents #23 and #46) of eight residents reviewed for resident abuse and 5 of 5 residents in the confidential group interview. 1. The facility failed to ensure the staff did not retaliate against family members of Resident #23 for allegedly making a report of abuse or neglect against a staff member . As a result, the family member was afraid to visit Resident #23. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #46 did not feel bullied by staff 3. The facility failed to have mechanism in place to ensure families and residents felt safe to report allegations of abuse, neglect, or misappropriation. 4. The facility failed to have the number for the HHS Hotline Posted. These failures places residents at risk of abuse along with allegations of abuse identified and investigated thoroughly. Findings included: Record review of the facility's Policy and Procedure…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-11-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible, in 4 rooms (Rooms #101, #102, #104 and #113) out of sixteen resident rooms on 100 hall reviewed for accident hazards, in that; The facility failed to ensure that the hot water temperatures in the sinks for 5 resident rooms did not exceed the maximum of 110 degrees Fahrenheit. This failure could place residents at risk for injuries related to hot water temperatures. The findings included: Record review of Resident #18's admission record dated 11/13/2024 indicated he was admitted to facility on 02/20/2014 with diagnoses of dementia and muscle weakness. He was [AGE] years of age. Record review of Resident #18's MDS dated [DATE] indicated in part: BIMS = 0 indicating resident was severely impaired. Record review of Resident #37's admission record dated 11/13/2024 indicated he was admitted to facility on 08/30/2024 with diagnoses of dementia and muscle weakness.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to FOCUSED POST ACUTE CARE PARTNERS — 25 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 33 rows in the source record cover these 19 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 77% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $240K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX