Crestview Court

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 113 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 71.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 80 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.45 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 76% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 125 beds and averages 86.1 residents a day — about 69% occupied, or roughly 39 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.40 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.50 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.73 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.09 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.53 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.52 to 0.47 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 58% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · K2025-02-21 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure resident was free from physcial abuse for 1 (Resident #1) of 7 residents reviewed for abuse and neglect. 1. The facility failed to protect Resident #1 from physical abuse by CNA A and LVN B. While attempting to collect a urine sample by in and out Cath, CNA held Resident #1's hands down, while LVN B attempted to force apart the legs of the resident. The LVN continued to force the legs and try to catheterize Resident #1 as the resident was screaming, resisting, and asking them to stop. Resident #1 was later assessed by LVN C as he was collecting the urine, by taking the resident to the bathroom, vaginal bleeding was noted. The LVN C assessed Resident #1 she had a laceration to her vaginal area. This failure could place residents at risk of abuse, injury, and emotional distress. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The IJ began on 09/24/2024 and ended on 09/25/2024. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to implement the facility's own written abuse prevention policy and procedure for one (Resident #1) of seven residents reviewed for abuse. 1. The facility failed to protect Resident #1 from physical abuse by CNA A and LVN B. While attempting to collect a urine sample by in and out Cath, CNA held Resident #1's hands down, while LVN B attempted to force apart the legs of the resident. The LVN continued to force the legs and try to catheterize Resident #1 as the resident was screaming, resisting, and asking them to stop. Resident #1 was later assessed by LVN C as he was collecting the urine, by taking the resident to the bathroom, vaginal bleeding was noted. The LVN C assessed Resident #1 she had a laceration to her vaginal area. This failure could place residents at risk of abuse, injury, and emotional distress. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The IJ began on 09/24/2024 and ended on 09/25/2024. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-09-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for one (Resident #1) of two residents reviewed for accidents. LVN A failed to provide supervision to prevent accidents when she continued to try to get urine sample after the resident said no, and knowing he was confused and angry, and that he required supervision to ambulate, she saw him get out of bed and closed the door on her way out. This resulted in the resident running down the hall after her and falling, sustain a serious injury. These failures placed the resident at risk for accidents and injuries. Findings included: Record review of Resident 1's face sheet dated [DATE] reflected the resident was an [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. His diagnoses included unspecified Dementia (a group of symptoms affecting memory, thinking and social abilities), Epilepsy (Brain condition that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-14 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse and neglect for one of three incidents (Resident #1) reviewed for reporting according to facility policy. CNA A failed to follow the facility's policy to report allegations of neglect when she failed to report Resident #1 fell over hitting her shoulder/neck on the bedrail when she reached for the wheelchair during attempted transfer, in which she did not use a gait belt, on 06/12/25. This failure could place the residents in the facility at risk of neglect and lack of timely reporting of incidents. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 06/14/25 revealed Resident #1 was [AGE] year-old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #1's MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 had a BIMS score of 00, indicating Resident #1 was not able to complete. Resident #1 utilized a wheelchair, Resident #1 required partial/moderate assistance…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-14 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse were reported immediately to the Administrator of the facility for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for reporting abuse and neglect. The facility failed to report an incident to HHSC involving CNA A failing to perform a safe, proper transfer using a gait-belt for Resident #1 which resulted in the resident bumping against the siderail. The failure placed residents at risk of injuries and neglect of care. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 06/14/25 revealed Resident #1 was [AGE] year-old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #1's MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 had a BIMS score of 00, indicating Resident #1 was not able to complete. Resident #1 utilized a wheelchair, Resident #1 required partial/moderate assistance with lying to sitting on side of bed and chair/bed to chair transfer. The resident's active diagnoses included…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 3 resident (Resident #1) reviewed for supervision. CNA A failed to safely transfer Resident #1 from her bed to the wheelchair, which resulted in her losing her grasp of the resident and the resident bumping against the siderail. The failure placed residents at risk of injury. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 06/14/25 revealed Resident #1 was [AGE] year-old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #1's MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 had a BIMS score of 00, indicating Resident #1 was not able to complete. Resident #1 utilized a wheelchair, Resident #1 required partial/moderate assistance with lying to sitting on side of bed and chair/bed to chair transfer. The resident's active diagnoses included Non-Alzheimer's Dementia (loss of memory and other intellectual functions), Malnutrition…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-24 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that ensured drugs and biologicals were accurately acquired, received, dispensed, and administered) to meet the needs of each resident for one (the only medication room) of one medication rooms reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure expired medication administration supplies were removed from the only facility medication room. These failures could place residents at risk for infection and having possible adverse effects. Findings included: In an interview and observation on [DATE] at 11:23 a.m., expired supplies found stored in the medication room included: 1 - box of 100 count insulin syringes that expired on [DATE] 5 - boxes of 100 count tuberculin syringes that expired on [DATE] The DON was present and stated Central Supply is responsible for monitoring the expiration dates of supplies in the medication room. The DON reported he thought the central supply…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the facility's kitchen, reviewed for food safety. 1. The facility failed to correctly label and date 4 storage bags of cheese. 2. The facility failed to correctly label a cart of water and juice stored in the refrigerator. 3. The facility failed to label and date packages of opened bread. These failures could place residents at risk for food-borne illness and cross contamination. Findings included: Observation of the dry storage room in the kitchen on 04/22/2025 at 9:40 a.m. revealed a tray with 3 open packages of bread. There were no dates on the open packages. Observation of the walk in refrigerator on 04/22/2025 at 9:46 a.m. revealed a cart with prepared water and juice with no creation or discard dates on the tray or containers. Observation of a the walk in refrigerator on 04/23/23/2025 at 11:25 Am revealed several packages of cheese were observed to be open with only the received date on the packaging. In an interveiw with the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of any significant medication errors for one (Resident #52) of four residents reviewed for medication errors. The facility failed to ensure potassium (a mineral supplement used to treat or prevent low potassium levels in the blood) was administered to Resident #52 as ordered from 4/10/2025 until 4/23/2025 (13 days). This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving medications as ordered by their physician and not receiving the intended therapeutic benefit of the medications. Findings included: Record review of Resident #52's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #52 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of hypertension (high blood pressure), respiratory failure, and vitamin deficiency. Section N of the MDS assessment revealed Resident #52 was taking a diuretic (medication that reduces fluid build up in the body). Section C of the MDS…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-17 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs for two (Resident #1 and Resident #2) of four reviewed for resident call system, in that. 1.Resident #1 and Resident #2's call lights were on the floor and not within reach on 10/10/2024. This failure could place the residents at risk of not receiving the care and services to maintain their highest level of well-being. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's electronic face sheet, printed on 10/10/2024, revealed a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility 04/24/2024 with diagnoses that included but not limited to dementia (loss of cognitive function), glaucoma (a condition that damages the optic nerve, often due to increased eye pressure, leading to vision loss or blindness), high blood pressure. Record review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS score of 03, indicating the was severely…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments for one (400 hall cart) of four medication carts. The facility failed to lock the 400-hall cart leaving all medications on the carts accessible. These failures could affect all resident by placing them at risk for possible drug diversions. Findings included: Observation on 10/10/2024 at 12:50 PM revealed the 400 hall cart was left unattended and unlocked for approximately one minute. There were no residents observed on the hall. The drawers of the cart were able to be pulled open and all routine medications were accessible. Interview on 10/10/2024 at 12:53 PM LVN A stated she left the cart unlocked due to being called into a resident's room for assistance. LVN A stated she would typically always lock the cart when it was not within eyesight, but she forgot. LVN A stated the 400-hall cart contained all routine medication for the 400 hall. LVN A stated the risk of leaving the medication cart unlocked would be others would have access to the medication.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all alleged violations involving abuse, and neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, were reported immediately but not later than 24 hours if the events that caused the allegation did not involve abuse and did not result in serious bodily injury to the State Survey Agency in accordance with State law through established procedures for one (Resident #1) of three incidents reviewed for reporting. The facility failed to report within 2 hours to the State Survey Agency when Resident #1 had an altercation with LVN A which resulted in Resident#1 falling face first. Resident#1 was transported to the hospital with a major head injury which supports serious bodily injury. These failures could affect place residents by resulting in at risk of a delay of identification of abuse or neglect and lack of timely follow-up on recommended interventions to prevent harm, or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-03-21 · tag F0640 — pattern
  Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to within 14 days after a facility completed a resident's assessment, a facility must electronically transmit encoded, accurate, and complete MDS data to the CMS system for two (Residents #24 and #48) of eight residents reviewed for resident assessments. The facility failed to ensure Residents #24 and #48's Admission, Quarterly and Annual MDS assessments was transmitted within 14 days after their MDS Assessments were completed. The MDS Assessments were not completed and submitted timely and accurately on 07/16/23, 10/17/23, 11/01/23, 11/16/23, 02/16/24 and 03/15/24. This failure could place residents at risk of not getting appropriate care and services at the facility if CMS was unable to track the location and condition of the residents, which could cause a loss of their healthcare benefits and lead to increased room and board fees and discharge notices, resulting in distress and decline in their psycho-social well-being. The findings included: A) Record…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$16,799 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $16,799 — penalty dated 2025-02-21

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CANTEX CONTINUING CARE — 37 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX