The Carlyle at Stonebridge Park

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 120 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 60.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 55 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.39 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 66% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 36% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 112 beds and averages 95.0 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 17 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.30 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.37 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.87 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.89 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.46 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.39 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 61% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

35 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 23 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-08-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive assessment of a resident for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's catheter/catheter balloon remained in place in the bladder. On 08/04/25, the resident had a change in condition, and the NP ordered bloodwork, a UA, and a catheter change. During the catheter change, Resident #1 began to bleed from the catheter site and a few hours later, labs from the bloodwork came back critical and was sent to the hospital. Resident #1 was diagnosed with acute kidney failure and trauma to the urethra due to the catheter balloon not being in the right location. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 08/21/25 at 4:55 PM. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 5:10 PM. While the IJ was removed on 08/22/25, the facility remained out of compliance…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · J2023-10-19 · tag F0694 — isolated
  Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer parenteral fluids consistent with professional standards of practice and in accordance with physician orders for one (Resident #1) of one resident reviewed for parenteral fluids. The facility failed to obtain physician orders to manage, provide care, and change Resident #1's CVC dressing at least every 7 days and as needed if the dressing or site appeared compromised (damp, loosened or visibly soiled). The facility failed to change Resident #1's CVC dressing at least every 7 days and ensure Resident #1's central line was maintained per professional standards and facility policy. On 10/04/23 Resident #1 was transferred to the ER and admitted for a medical emergency - Sepsis (the body's extreme response to an infection) and Septic Shock (a life-threatening condition that happens when blood pressure drops to a dangerously low level after an infection). An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 10/18/23. The IJ template was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-12 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing and administering of all drugs and biologicals, to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for pharmacy services. LVN C failed to document on the EMAR when she administered hydrocodone (pain medication) to Resident #1 on 05/11/26 at 4:00 AM. This failure could place residents at risk for loss of prescribed medications, potential for not receiving their prescribed medications, and risk of drug diversion. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's None of the Above MDS Assessment, dated 05/06/26, reflected she was an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her MDS did not included any active diagnoses, information regarding her cognition nor medications. Review of Resident #1's admission Record, dated 05/12/26, reflected the following diagnoses: non-displaced…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-01-08 · tag F0554 — pattern
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the interdisciplinary team determined if a resident was able to self-administer medications for 3 of 33 residents (Resident #41, Resident #115 and Resident #118) reviewed for resident rights.1.The facility's interdisciplinary team failed to ensure Resident #41 was clinically appropriate to self-administer Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray, Azelastine HCL and Major Deep Sea Premium Saline Nasal Spray that were at the resident's bedside.2.The facility failed to ensure Resident #115, with nasal spray at her bedside, was clinically appropriate to self-administer medications that were at the resident's bedside.3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #118 was clinically appropriate to self-administer cough syrup that were at the resident's bedside. The failure had the potential to place residents at risk for unsafe drug administration.Findings included:1.Record review of Resident #41's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 11/14/25, reflected…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices for 1 of 44 residents (Resident #45) reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to obtain physician orders for the use of an arm sling and leg brace for Resident #45. This failure placed residents at risk of not receiving appropriate care and worsening of their conditions.Findings included: Record review of Resident #45's admission MDS assessment, dated 10/06/25, reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #45 had diagnoses that included stroke (loss of blood flow to part of the brain), muscle weakness (loss of strength to move, felt as difficulty with tasks, balance issues, or trembling), abnormalities of gait and mobility. He had a BIMS score of 9, which indicated his cognition was. The moderately…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-01-08 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — pattern
  Provide appropriate foot care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received proper treatment and care to maintain good foot health by providing foot care and treatment, in accordance with professional standards of practice, including to prevent complications from the resident's medical condition 2 of 5 residents (Resident #42 and Resident #75) reviewed for foot care. The facility failed to provide Resident #42 and Resident #75 assistance with toenail care. Resident #42 and Resident #75 toenails were observed to be about half inch long on each foot.This failure could place the residents at risk for decreased feelings of self-worth and infection.Findings include: 1.Record review of Resident #42's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 12/26/25, revealed Resident #42 was an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #42 had cognition intact with a BIMS score of 04 (indicating severe cognitive impairment). Resident #42 required partial/moderate assistance from staff with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored securely for 2 of 33 residents (Resident #39 and Resident #118) on one hall reviewed for storage of medications.1.The facility failed to ensure two pills (Zoloft and Memantine) were not left on the floor in Resident #39's room on 01/06/26. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #118 cough syrup was not left unattended at his bedside on 01/06/26. This failure could place residents at risk of consuming unsafe medications.Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #39's annual MDS assessment, dated 12/02/25, reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The residents' diagnoses included anxiety disorder (involve more than occasional worry or fear), depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), hepatic encephalopathy (brain disorder caused by liver failure), and Non-Alzheimer's Dementia (brain condition that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-08 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to coordinate the assessment with the pre-admission screening and resident review (PASARR ) program for one (Resident #49) of five resident assessments reviewed for PASARR evaluations.The facility did not refer Resident #49 to the appropriate state-designated mental health authority for review when she received a new diagnosis of bipolar disorder. This failure could affect residents with psychiatric diagnoses who may not be evaluated and receive needed PASARR services.The findings were:Record review of Resident #49's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 12/17/25, reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The residents' diagnoses included anxiety disorder (involve more than occasional worry or fear), depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), psychotic disorder (a collection of symptoms that affect the mind), schizophrenia (affects how people think, feel and behave),…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-08 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure necessary treatment and services to promote healing for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #10) reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility failed to ensure Resident #10's Stage 3 pressure ulcer was covered with a dressing. This failure could place residents at risk of severe pain, and lead to systemic infections causing harm for residents. Findings included:Record review of Resident #10's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 11/20/25, reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The residents' diagnosis was pressure ulcer of sacral region. Resident #10's BIMS score was 04 which indicated severe cognitive impairment. The MDS assessment Section M - Skin Conditions indicated Resident #10 was at risk of pressure ulcers and had an unhealed pressure ulcer. Record review of Resident' 10's care plan, revised date 01/04/26, reflected: Focus: The resident has a Stage III pressure ulcer to Sacrum. Goal: The resident's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the clinical records were maintained in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices and were complete and accurately documented for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #10 and Resident #104) records reviewed for treatment documentation.The facility failed to document wound care treatments on the Treatment Administration Record for Resident #10 and Resident #104 indicated by blanks on residents January 2026 TAR.These failures could affect the residents medical record not being an accurate representation of the resident's medical condition or medical needs. Findings included:1.Record review of Resident #10's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 11/20/25, reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The residents' diagnoses included Alzheimer's Disease (brain condition that slowly damages your memory, thinking, learning and organizing skills), pressure ulcer of sacral region, and chronic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #8) reviewed for infection control.LNV C failed to put on appropriate PPE, a gown, before administering daily water flush via gastronomy tube to Resident #8, who was on enhanced barrier precautions.This failure could place residents at risk of cross contamination and the spread of infection.Findings included:Record review of Resident #8's significant change in status MDS assessment, dated 10/22/25, reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident had a diagnosis of gastrostomy status (surgical opening into the stomach for nutritional support). Resident #8's BIMS score was 07 which indicated severe cognitive impairment.Record review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-01 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for medication administration.The facility failed to acquire and administer Resident #1's physician ordered medications timely when she admitted to the facility on [DATE], which resulted in the resident missing one dose of the antibiotic, Daptomycin-Sodium Chloride Intravenous Solution 700-0.9 mg/100 ml, six doses of the central nervous system stimulant, Adderall 20 mg, and seven doses of Juven, a physician-ordered therapeutic nutrition powder for wound healing, after she admitted to the facility on [DATE] following knee revision surgery.This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving medications as prescribed, decreased therapeutic effects of the medications, risk for drug diversion, delay in medication…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$125,895 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $113,246 — penalty dated 2025-08-22
• $12,649 — penalty dated 2023-09-20

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CANTEX CONTINUING CARE — 37 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX