Ashford Gardens

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

45.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 32 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 43.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 37 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 45% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 28% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 202 beds and averages 142.6 residents a day — about 71% occupied, or roughly 59 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.25 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.28 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.15 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.80 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.43 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.35 to 0.10 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 43% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · K2024-05-17 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to identify and ensure that residents received the necessary treatment and services, to promote healing and prevent infection for 2 of 9 residents (CR#1 and Resident #2) reviewed for pressure ulcer in that: -The facility failed to identify and treat pressure sore on CR#1's penis, left foot 5th toe, Right Toe Digit 1, great -The facility failed to provide CR#1 with an air mattress for 20 days with multiple diagnoses of Stage 4 pressure ulcers. -The facility failed to initiate precautions for pressure sores when an order was not obtained for air mattress. -The facility failed to prevent progression of the CR#1's Stage 4 Sacral Pressure Ulcer that was not getting better and enlarged from 6x6.2x0.4 cm on 2/27/24 to 10.7x8.9x0.4 cm on 4/15/24, had odor and exhibited signs of infection. -Resident #2's Pressure wounds dressing was not changed as per physician's orders. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 5/2/24 at 3:46 p.m. While the IJ was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living receives the necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 residents reviewed for quality of life.-The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's brief was changed before becoming full of urine and wetting his bed sheet.This failure could place residents at risk of skin breakdown.The findings included:Record review of Resident #1's admission Record, dated 05/27/26, revealed a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included acute cystitis without hematuria (bladder infection without blood in the urine), deficiency of other vitamins, pain, and quadriplegia, C5-C7 incomplete (spinal cord injury resulting in partial loss of motor function and sensation in all four limbs).Record review of Resident #1's MDS Assessment, dated 05/22/26, revealed a BIMS score of 15, indicating cognition was intact. Further…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-05-01 · tag F0563 — failed to protect the right to visitors — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to receive visitors of his or her choosing, at the time of his or her choosing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide residents access to visitors of his or her choosing at the time of his or her choosing, subject to the resident's right to deny visitation when applicable, and in a manner that does not impose on the rights of another resident for 1 of 1 facility's.- The facility failed to allow any visitors in the building after 8pm when the doors locked.This failure could place residents at risk for decreased quality of life, sadness, and depression.Findings include: In an interview on 4/30/26 at 9:45am, LVN I said visitation hours were from 8am to 8pm and they did not allow any family members in the facility after 8pm. She said the doors locked at 8pm and the only people that were allowed to come in after that were EMS personnel or family to a resident who was passing away. She said EMS personnel had to ring the doorbell or call the facility on the phone.In an interview on 4/30/26 at 9:49am, the Receptionist said she worked Tuesdays, Thursdays, and Fridays from 8am to 8pm.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-05-01 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services which included procedures that assured the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing and administering of all drugs and biologicals to meet the needs of each resident for 2 of 8 medication carts (Hall 2300/2400 Nurse cart and Hall 2100/2200 Med Aide cart) reviewed for pharmacy services.1. The facility failed to ensure expired medications were not stored with current medications on the 2300/2400 Hall Nurse cart.2. The facility failed to ensure expired medications were not stored with current medications on the 2100/2200 Med Aide cart.These failures could place residents at risk for not receiving therapeutic benefits of the medication and/or worsening health concerns.Findings include: In an observation on 5/1/26 at 9:47 AM of Hall 2300/2400 Nurse cart the following expired medications were found:-Insulin Lispro 100/ml Opened 3/26/26-Insulin Lantus 100/ml Opened 3/17/26-Insulin Lantus 100/ml Opened 3/31/26-Artificial Tears…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-05-01 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
  Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program so that the facility was free of pests for 2 of 4 hallways, (Halls 2400 and Hall 1200), the conference room and Resident #44's room. The facility had live flies, roaches and bed bugs in areas of the facility including Halls 2400, 1200, the conference room and Resident #44's room. This failure could place residents at risk for decreased health, safety and quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #44's Electronic Health Record revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosesis including idiopathic (a chronic condition characterized by a sudden drop in blood pressure upon standing), Hyperkalemia (excessively high potassium levels in the blood), Cellulitis of right toe and right lower limb, muscle weakness, elevated white blood cell count, Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Gram-negative rod-shaped…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 2 of 8 residents (Residents #101 and #146) reviewed for comprehensive care plans. -The facility failed to provide Residents #101 and #146 with a comprehensive person-centered care plan to address their diet orders. This failure could place residents at risk of not having personalized plans developed to address their specific care needs. Findings included: Record review of Resident #101's face sheet dated 05/01/2026 revealed a [AGE] year old female with an admission date 05/20/2022 with a primary diagnosis of hypertension (condition where the force of blood against the artery walls is consistently too high). Resident #101 had a secondary diagnosis to include dysphagia (when it's hard to get food or drink from your mouth down to your stomach.) Record review of Resident #101's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-01 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who was fed by enteral means received the appropriate treatment and services to restore, if possible, oral eating skills and to prevent complications of enteral feeding including but not limited to aspiration pneumonia, diarrhea, vomiting, dehydration, metabolic abnormalities, and nasal-pharyngeal ulcers for 1 of 3 (Resident #97) residents reviewed for tube feeding. LVN A failed to check for placement of the G-tube before giving Resident #97 his morning medications on 4/30/26.This failure could place residents at risk for the medications going into the abdominal cavity, pain, infection, and hospitalization.Findings include:Record review of Resident #97's, undated, face sheet revealed a [AGE] year old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #97 had diagnoses which included sepsis (infection throughout body), type 2 diabetes (body does not produce…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-01 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that the medication error rate was not five percent (5%) or greater. The facility had a medication error rate of 18%, based on 5 errors out of 27 opportunities, which involved 2 of 3 residents (Resident #70 and Resident #97) and 2 of 3 staff (MA K and LVN A) observed during medication administration reviewed for medication errors.- MA K failed to give Resident #70 his Supplement Pass (provides protein) 90ml during his morning medication administration on 4/29/26.- MA K failed to give Resident #70 his Aspirin 81mg during his morning medication administration on 4/29/26. - LVN A failed to give Resident #97 his Vitamin C 500mg/5ml in the right dose and right form during his morning medication administration on 4/30/26.- LVN A failed to give Resident #97 his Valproic Acid (seizure medication) 250mg/5ml in the right dose and right form during his morning medication administration on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-01 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free from any significant medication errors for 1 of 3 (Resident #97) residents reviewed for pharmacy services.1. LVN A failed to give Resident #97 the correct dose of Valproic Acid (seizure medication) and gave the resident a double dose during his morning medication administration on 4/30/26. 2. LVN A failed to give Resident #97 the correct form of Valproic Acid and gave it in capsule form instead of liquid form during his morning medication administration on 4/30/26.3. LVN A failed to give Resident #97 his Insulin Glargine during his morning medication administration on 4/30/26.These failures could place residents at risk of side effects due to an increase in dosage, toxicity, and overdose.Findings include:Record review of Resident #97's, undated, face sheet revealed a [AGE] year old male who was admitted to the facility 4/13/26. Resident #97 had diagnoses…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 out of 28 resident rooms (Resident #42 and Resident #97) reviewed for infection control. - LVN AB failed to wear appropriate PPE while giving G-tube (tube into stomach for nutrition) medications to Resident #42, when she was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions.- LVN A failed to wear appropriate PPE while giving G-tube medications to Resident #97, when he was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions.These failures could place residents and staff at risk for cross contamination and infection.The findings included:Record review of Resident #42's undated face sheet revealed she was a [AGE] year old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of acute…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-31 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident #1 received treatment and care in accordance with professional stands of practice for one (Resident #1).The facility failed to follow Resident #1's physician order to ensure his legs were wrapped on 3/31/2026.This failure could place residents at risk of neglect and not having their care needs met, a decline in physical and psychosocial health, and worsening of the residents' condition. Findings include: Record Review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 03/31/2026 revealed he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including cardiac arrhythmia, unspecified symptoms and signs involving the musculoskeletal system, osteitis deformans of multiple sites, disorder of the eye and adnexa (the structures surrounding the eye, which include the eyelids, conjunctiva, lacrimal (tear) glands, and extraocular muscles), lymphedema (cancer that affects the lymphatic system),…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$11,009 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $11,009 — penalty dated 2024-05-17

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CANTEX CONTINUING CARE — 37 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 4 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 83% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX