Larkspur

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

60.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 138 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 55.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 78 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 24% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 86.0 residents a day — about 72% occupied, or roughly 34 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.42 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.546 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.69 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.89 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.64 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.64 to 0.33 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-06-25 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from sexual abuse for 2 of 15 residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) reviewed for abuse. 1. The facility failed to prevent sexual abuse for Resident #1 witnessed by CNA A on 06/08/2024 at approximately 2:00 p.m. to be in her room covered with a sheet and lying in bed with the Floor Tech. 2. The facility failed to prevent sexual abuse for Resident #2 that reported to CNA B on 06/08/2024 at 2:15 p.m. that the Floor Tech approximately two weeks prior had touched her hip, rubbed his penis against her while clothed, and asked if she was interested while making sexual body gestures. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The IJ began on 06/08/2024 and ended on 06/08/2024. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. This failure could place residents at risk for psychosocial harm, impaired quality of life in unsafe environment, and further abuse. Findings included: 1. Review of a face…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-02-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and assistance to prevent accidents for 1 of 7 residents reviewed for accidents/supervision (Resident #1). The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's wheelchair was locked during a transfer causing the resident to slide out of the wheelchair and fall. Resident #1 sustained an acute comminuted fracture (when a bone breaks into 3 or more pieces) of the right femur (bone above the knee). The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The Immediate Jeopardy began on 10/24/23 and ended on 10/26/23. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. This failure could place all residents at risk of severe injuries or death. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 10/31/23 indicated she was a [AGE] year old female admitted to the facility 11/3/22, with diagnoses including Type 2 Diabetes with diabetic neuropathy (a type of nerve damage that can occur if you have diabetes),…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 3 of 6 residents (Residents #34, #66 and #71) and 2 of 7 staff (CNA A and CNA B) reviewed for infection control. 1. The facility failed to ensure CNA A followed EBP and proper infection control measures when providing direct care and handling soiled linens for Resident #66 on 6/08/2026. 2. The facility failed to ensure EBP was initiated and followed for Residents #34 and #66 on 6/08/2026 and 6/09/2026. 3. The facility failed to ensure CNA B followed EBP when providing direct care to Resident #71 on 6/09/2026. These failures could place residents at risk of exposure to infectious diseases due to improper infection control practices. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #66's facility face sheet, dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-10 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents fed by enteral means received the appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #52) reviewed for enteral nutrition. The facility failed to ensure staff followed facility policy to label the formula label with date, time and initials of nurse when formula bag was started. This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk of dehydration and weight loss. Findings include: Record review of the face sheet, dated 6/09/26, reflected Resident #52 was a [AGE] year-old male who initially admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses include severe protein-calorie malnutrition, paraplegia and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Record review of the nursing home MDS assessment, dated 3/13/26, reflected Resident #52 had a BIMS score of 09, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #52 required total assistance from staff with ADLs. Resident #52 received 51% or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living receives the necessary services to maintain personal hygiene for 1 of 8 residents reviewed for ADLs (Resident #2)The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 received timely incontinent care on 10/29/2025.This failure could place residents who required assistance from staff for ADLs at risk of not receiving care and services to meet their needs, which could result in poor care.Findings included:Record review of an admission Record for Resident #2 dated 10/29/2025 indicated she admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was [AGE] years old with diagnoses of cerebral infarction (stroke), type 2 diabetes, major depressive disorder (persistent sadness and loss of interest in doing things) and hypertension (high blood pressure).Record review of a Quarterly MDS Assessment for Resident #2 dated 9/1/2025 indicated she did not have any cognitive impairment with a BIMS score of 13.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-02 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments under proper temperature controls for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for pharmacy services.The facility failed to ensure a tube of diclofenac sodium topical gel 1% (primary use for pain relief) was not in the room of Resident #3 on 10/28/2025.This failure could place residents at risk for adverse effects and reduced therapeutic effects of medication.Findings included:Record review of an admission Record for Resident #3 dated 10/28/2025 indicated she admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was [AGE] years old with diagnoses of benign neoplasm of cerebral meninges (non-cancer tumor in the brain), rheumatoid arthritis (chronic disorder that affects the joints), and chronic kidney disease (loss of kidney function).Record review of an admission MDS Assessment for Resident #3 dated 9/15/2025 indicated she had moderate cognitive impairment with a BIMS score of 11. During…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for infection control.The facility failed to ensure CNA C changed her gloves, washed or sanitized her hands, and placed clean items on dirty linens when providing care to Resident #2 on 10/29/2025.This failure could place residents at risk of exposure to infectious diseases due to improper infection control practices.Findings included:Record review of an admission Record for Resident #2 dated 10/29/2025 indicated she admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was [AGE] years old with diagnoses of cerebral infarction (stroke), type 2 diabetes, major depressive disorder (persistent sadness and loss of interest in doing things), and hypertension (high blood pressure).Record…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living receives the necessary services to maintain personal hygiene for 2 of 6 residents reviewed for ADLs (Residents #23 and Resident #24) 1.The facility failed to clean/groom Resident #23's fingernails. Resident #23 had long fingernails that were about an inch in length with a yellow-brown substance underneath them on 4/21/2025 and 4/22/2025. 2.The facility failed to clean/groom Resident #24's fingernails that had a black substance underneath them on 4/21/2025 to 4/23/2025. These failures could place residents who required assistance from staff for ADLs at risk of not receiving care and services to meet their needs which could result in poor care. Findings included: 1. Record review of an admission Record for Resident #23 dated 4/22/2025 indicated she admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was [AGE] years old with diagnoses of parkinsonism (nervous system disorder that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #32) reviewed for accidents/hazards. The facility failed to remove worn and damaged mechanical lift slings from service from 04/21/2025 through 04/23/2025. This failure could place residents at risk of a loss of quality of life due to injuries. Findings included: 1. Record review of a facility face sheet dated 4/21/2025 for Resident #32 indicated that she was a 65 -year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including morbid obesity due to excessive calorie intake and essential hypertension (uncontrolled blood pressure). Record review of a Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #32 indicated that she had a BIMS score of 15, which indicated she was cognitively intact. She was dependent for all transfers and most ADLs. Record review of a comprehensive care plan dated 3/11/2025 for Resident #32…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-23 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that assures the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of medications for 1 of 2 medication rooms (Bluebonnet) reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to dispose of expired medications from the medication room for Bluebonnet on 4/22/2025 which included: *Resident #35 had a foil package of albuterol 0.083% (nebulized medication that helps with breathing) that expired February 2025. *Resident #24 had a box of albuterol 0.083% that expired February 2025. *Resident #191 had 1 box of ipratropium/albuterol 0.5 mg/3 mg (nebulized medication that helps with breathing) that expired October 2024 and 3 boxes of ipratropium/albuterol 0.5 mg/3 mg that expired February 2025. These failures could place residents at risk for adverse effects and reduced therapeutic effects of medication. 1. Record review of an admission Record for Resident #35 dated 4/22/2025 indicated she…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments under proper temperature controls for 1 of 18 rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER]) reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure a syringe of normal saline 0.9% (a solution used to maintain hydration) and 1 syringe of heparin 500 units per 5 ml (blood thinner) was were not on a bedside table in an unoccupied room (room [ROOM NUMBER]) on 4/21/2025. These failures could place residents at risk for adverse effects and reduced therapeutic effects of medication. Findings include: During an observation on 4/21/25 at 9:21 AM, an unoccupied room (room [ROOM NUMBER]) had 1 syringe of Normal Saline 0.9% and 1 syringe of heparin 500 units per 5 ml lying on a side table. During an interview on 4/21/25 at 9:33 am, LVN E said that the resident in room [ROOM NUMBER] was discharged to the hospital last week. She said she had only worked on 300 hall for a short time and was not sure…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #20) and 1 of 5 staff (CNA D) reviewed for infection control. CNA D failed to wear appropriate PPE for contact isolation precautions when providing care to Resident #20 on 4/21/2025. This failure could place residents at risk of exposure to infectious diseases due to improper infection control practices. Findings included: Record review of Resident # 20's facility face sheet revealed Resident #20 was a [AGE] year-old female and admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis of memory deficit following cerebrovascular disease. Record review of Resident #20's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS of 13 indicating intact cognition and required supervision with activities of daily…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$30,928 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $17,068 — penalty dated 2024-06-25
• $13,860 — penalty dated 2024-02-12

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CANTEX CONTINUING CARE — 37 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX