Windemere At Westover Hills

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

52.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 306 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 47.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 181 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.41 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 70% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 30% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 112 beds and averages 108.2 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.06 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.64 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.43 to 0.31 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 57% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-04-16 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on and interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately inform the resident's physician when there was a significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for physician notification of changes. The facility failed to inform Resident #1's physician on 3/11/25 when a BP of 80/42 was obtained by LVN A before Resident #1 was transported to dialysis. Resident #1 was treated for hypotension at the hospital after being sent there from dialysis. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 4/11/25. The IJ template was presented to the facility ED and DON on 4/11/25 at 6:30 pm. While the IJ was removed on 4/16/25 at 11:16 am, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and a severity level of no actual harm with the potential for more than minimal harm due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective measures. This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk for a delay in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-04-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's choices for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to immediately intervene when Resident #1 was found to have a BP of 80/42, complained of generalized pain, and requested to go to the hospital on 3/11/25. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 4/14/25. The IJ template was presented to the facility ED, DON, RDCS, and VPO (via telephone) on 4/14/25 at 1:58 pm. While the IJ was removed on 4/16/25 at 11:16 am, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and a severity level of no actual harm with the potential for more than minimal harm, due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective measures. This failure could affect residents who experience a change in condition by placing them at risk for a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for 3 of 5 medication carts (the 100/300 hall medication aide cart, the 100/300/400 hall nurse cart, and the 700 hall nurse cart) assessed for medication storage and labeling. The facility failed to ensure medications located inside the 100/300 hall medication aide cart, the 100/300/400 hall nurse cart, and the 700 hall nurse cart were stored in properly labeled containers. This failure could place residents at risk of receiving inadequate treatments or ingesting medications for which they were not prescribed. The findings included: During an observation of the 700 hall nurse cart on 12/17/2025 at 9:30 AM, an accessed insulin vial was discovered in the cart with no date of removal from refrigeration. During an interview with LVN A on 12/17/2025 at 9:30 AM, LVN A stated if an insulin vial did not have an opened date, the vial could be past the 28 days at room temperature period and be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as was possible for 2 of 8 residents (Resident #113, and Resident #16) reviewed for accidents and hazards: 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #113 did not have a can of disinfectant spray and a plastic pump spray bottle of air freshener in her room. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #16 did not have two pairs of scissors in her room.These failures could place residents at risk of harm or injury and contribute to avoidable accidents and a decline in health.The findings included:1. Record review of Resident #113's face sheet dated 12/18/25 revealed an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included history of falling, symptoms and signs involving cognitive function and awareness, repeated falls, need for assistance with personal care, lack of coordination, and dementia. Record review of Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-19 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needs respiratory care is provided with such care, consistent with professional standards of practice for 2 of 4 residents (Resident #7, and #29) reviewed for respiratory care.1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #7's oxygen concentrator filter was cleaned and free of debris.2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #29's oxygen concentrator filter was cleaned and free of debris, the oxygen tubing was touching the floor, and the oxygen flow rate was set according to the physician's ordersThese deficient practices could place residents at risk for an increase in respiratory complications. The findings included:1. Record review of Resident #7's face sheet dated 12/17/25 reflected an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE], and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included aftercare following joint replacement surgery, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a long-term, progressive lung…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-19 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure drug records were in order and that an account of all controlled drugs was maintained and periodically reconciled for 1 of 5 carts (500 hall nurse cart) reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure the controlled substance reconciliation log was signed for accuracy of medication quantities during shift change. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving their prescribed medications, experiencing untreated pain and anxiety, and a decreased quality of life. The findings included: During an observation of the 500 hall nurse cart on 12/18/2025 at 8:40 AM, a sample of controlled medications was inventoried for accuracy with LVN D. The sample inventory showed no discrepancies between medication quantities documented on the individual controlled substance logs and the number of pills remaining in the blister packs. However, record review of the comprehensive controlled medication reconciliation log used for the cart audit during shift change revealed the log was missing a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-19 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' clinical record was complete and accurate for 1 (Resident #130) of 25 residents reviewed, in that: Resident #130's diagnoses of Insomnia and Dementia were not present on the resident's diagnoses list. This deficient practice could result in delayed or improper care due to inaccurate clinical records. The findings were:Record review of Resident #130's face sheet, dated 12/18/2025, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, Acute kidney failure, and Muscle weakness. Record review of Resident #130's admission MDS, dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS score of 7 which indicated severe cognitive impairment. Record review of Resident #130's care plan, revised 07/25/2025, revealed [Resident #130] is resistive to care and medications. Record review of Resident #130's clinical record revealed a psychiatric provider note, date 09/22/2025, Tertiary Treating Dx:…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-09-13 · tag F0644 — pattern
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure all Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Level 1 residents with mental illness were provided with a PASARR Level II Evaluation and Assessment for 3 of 3 residents (#9, #27 and #38) reviewed for PASARR services. 1. The facility failed to identify Resident #9 as having several diagnoses related to Mental Illness including paranoid schizophrenia, manor depressive disorder, panic disorder, unspecified mood [affective] disorder and anxiety disorder, on the PASARR screening which would require a PASARR Level II assessment. 2. The facility failed to identify Resident #27 as having a diagnosis of unspecified Psychosis, a mental illness, which would require a PASARR Level II assessment. 3. The facility failed to identify Resident #38 as having a diagnosis of Bipolar Disorder, a mental illness which would require a PASARR Level II assessment. These deficient practices could place residents at risk to a diminished quality of life by not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store and prepare food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed, in that: Clean utensils and dishware had food particles from previous meals. This deficient practice could place residents who consumed meals and/or snacks from the kitchen at risk for food borne illness. The findings were: During a confidential group meeting on 09/12/2024 at11:00 a.m., members of the resident group stated utensils and dishware regularly have food particles from previous meals on them. Observation of clean utensils in the kitchen on 09/13/2024 at 11:42 a.m. revealed food particles on the utensils. During an interview with Dietary Aide H, at the same time as the observation, Dietary Aide H confirmed the utensils had been cleaned and food particles remained on them. Observation of clean dishware in the kitchen on 09/13/2024 at 11:46 a.m. revealed food particles on the dishware. During an interview with Dietary Aide H, at the same time as the observation, Dietary Aide H confirmed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to promote the residents' right to receive mail, for all facility residents, in that: Facility staff did not distribute mail received on Saturdays to the residents. This deficient practice could result in residents not receiving mail in a timely manner and a diminished quality of life. The findings were: During a confidential group meeting on 09/12/2024 at11:00 a.m., members of the resident group stated that they do not receive mail on Saturdays and stated they feel this practice is disrespectful. During an interview with Receptionist G on 09/12/2024 at 4:24 p.m., Receptionist G stated she had been directed by person who hired her (no longer with facility) to place all mail received on Saturdays, including resident mail, in the Business Office Manager's (BOM) mailbox, and confirmed the BOM does not work on weekends. During an interview with the BOM on 09/12/2024 at 4:32 p.m., the BOM confirmed she does not work on weekends, stated all mail received on Saturday is left in her box by receptionist, she distributes to intended…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0638 — isolated
  Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to assess a resident using the quarterly review instrument specified by the State and approved by CMS not less frequently than once every 3 months for 1 of 5 Residents (Resident #45) whose records were reviewed. MDS Staff failed to ensure Resident #45's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 9/13/24m was completed within 120 days of the annual MDS assessment, dated 5/6/24 This deficient practice could affect any resident and result in resident's not receiving the needed services. The findings were: Review of Resident #45's face sheet, undated, revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of vascular Dementia unspecified. Review of Resident #45's MDS history revealed she had an annual MDS assessment completed on 5/6/24 and then the following quarterly MDS assessment was not completed until 9/13/24; 130 days later. Interview on 09/13/24 at 03:53 PM with LVN A revealed the most recent quarterly MDS assessment was completed on 9/13/24. She…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure each assessment must accurately reflect the resident's status for 2 of 13 Residents (Resident #27 and Resident #45) reviewed for accuracy of assessments. 1. MDS staff failed to ensure Resident #27's quarterly MDS, 6/10/24, reflected she had a range of motion impairment on her upper extremity. 2. MDS staff coded Resident #45's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 9/13/24, having a significant weight loss. Resident #45 did not experience a significant weight loss during the look back period. These deficient practicers could affect residents by inaccurately reflecting their status which could contribute to residents not receiving necessary care and services. The findings were: 1. Review of MDS history dating back to 2021 revealed Resident #27 had a history of ROM impairment on upper and lower extremity. Review of Resident #27's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], revealed Resident #27 had ROM impairment to lower extremity and she received Occupational services.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,281 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,281 — penalty dated 2025-04-16

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CANTEX CONTINUING CARE — 37 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1 paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX