Woodville Health And Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

44.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 66 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 61.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 36 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.16 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 14% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 89 beds and averages 53.3 residents a day — about 60% occupied, or roughly 36 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.49 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.29 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.89 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.07 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.66 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.31 to 0.22 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and provided care in a manner that promoted maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 1 of 10 residents reviewed for resident rights. (Resident #1) The facility failed to treat Resident #1 with dignity and respect by LVN A denying his multiple requests to seek medical treatment at local ER on [DATE]. This failure could place residents at risk for decreased quality of life, decreased self-esteem and increased anxiety.Findings included: Record review of an admission record dated 05/05/2026 indicated Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old male initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of abscess of lung (bacterial infection in the lung develops into a pus-filled cavity) with pneumonia (infection that inflames the air sacs in one or both lungs), arthritis (swelling and tenderness of one or more joints) of right wrist, anxiety disorder (persistent and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-17 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure in accordance with professional standards of practices, the medical records on each resident were completely documented for 2 of 7 residents reviewed for complete medical records. (Residents #1 and #2) * The facility did not have any documentation of Resident #1 having elopement behaviors prior to her placement on the secured unit. * The facility did not have orders for Residents #1 and #2 to reside on the secured unit. This failure could place residents at risk of restraint and isolation. Findings included:1. Record review of a face sheet dated 01/17/26 indicated Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease (progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions) and dementia (loss of cognitive functioning). During an observations on 01/17/26 from 12:00 p.m. through 04:00 p.m. indicated Resident #1 was residing on the secured unit of the facility.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-07-08 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — pattern
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident's drug regimen was free of unnecessary drugs for 2 of 10 residents (Residents #13 and #34) reviewed for unnecessary medication. 1. The facility failed to monitor Resident #13 for side effects of the antianxiety medication, lorazepam (used to treat anxiety) routinely and PRN.2. The facility failed to ensure a stop date or reorder date was ordered for the PRN lorazepam for Resident #13. 3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #13 was monitored for side effects of the antipsychotic medication quetiapine fumarate (used to treat bipolar disorder).4. The facility failed to monitor Resident #34 for side effects of the antipsychotic medication Abilify (used to treat several mental health conditions).These failures could place residents at risk for adverse consequences and decline in health.Findings include:1. Record review of Resident #13's face sheet, dated 07/06/25, indicated a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-07-08 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
  Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program for 1of 1 kitchens reviewed for effective pest control in that: Numerous flies were observed throughout the kitchen during the noon meal preparation time on 07/07/2025. This failure could place residents at risk for spread of infection, cross-contamination, and decreased quality of life.Findings included: During observations and interviews on 07/07/2025 from 11:00 - 12:00 noon, during meal preparation and serving, numerous flies were swarming throughout the preparation area. Flies were observed landing on steamtable, cabinets, near handwashing sink, and near food cart. Six or 7 flies were killed with flyswatter within this period. [NAME] D and dietary aide E acknowledged the numerous flies and said the flies would come in through the side exit door of the kitchen which was approximately 10 yards from the rear exit door to the facility. They added the flies seemed to come inside more after it had rained. They said facility staff were constantly going in and out of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-08 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident had a right to a clean and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely for 1 of 2 shower rooms and 1 of 15 residents reviewed for environmental concerns. The facility failed to ensure Hall 400's shower room did not have one shower chair soiled with a brown substance with grayish area surrounding below the seat. The facility failed to ensure Resident #26's wheelchair and wheelchair cushion did not have smears of food and food particles.These failures could place residents at risk of a diminished quality of life due to exposure to an environment that is unpleasant, unsanitary, and unsafe.Findings include:1. During an observation and interview on 07/06/2025 at 08:45 a.m., Hall 400's shower room had one shower chair soiled with brown substance with grayish area surrounding below the seat. CNA F and CNA M acknowledged the soiled areas were below the seat of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-08 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident in a nursing facility was screened for a mental disorder (MD) or intellectual disability (ID) prior to admission and that individuals identified with MD or ID were evaluated and receive care and services in the most integrated setting appropriate to their needs for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for PASRR screenings. The facility failed to submit a new PL1 screening to TMHP (a group of contractors that administer Texas Medicaid on behalf of the Texas Health and Human Services Commission) dated 03/06/25, which indicated Resident #1 had positive evidence of mental illness. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving specialized services. Findings include:Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 07/06/25, indicated a [AGE] year-old-female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE]. Resident #1 had diagnoses of generalized anxiety disorder (severe, ongoing anxiety that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-08 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that the medication error rate was less than five percent or greater. The facility had a medication error rate of 7.79% based on 2 errors out of 26 opportunities, which involved 2 of 6 residents (Residents #6 and #49) and 2 of 3 staff observed during medication administration reviewed for medication error. 1. The facility failed to ensure LVN A administered Dorzolamide Solution 2% Ophthalmic (eye drops) per facility policy to Resident #49. 2. The facility failed to ensure LVN B did not administer Levothyroxine 75 MCG to Resident #6 on an empty stomach. These failures could place residents at risk of unwanted side effects and not receiving the therapeutic dosage of medications. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #49's face sheet indicated a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included rhabdomyolysis (a breakdown of muscle tissue that releases a damaging protein into the blood), and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-08 · tag F0813 — isolated
  Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain and ensure safe and sanitary storage of residents' food items for 1 of 1 residents room reviewed for food safety (room [ROOM NUMBER]) in that: The refrigerator located in room [ROOM NUMBER] was not monitored for expiration/used by dates. This failure could place residents at risk for food illnesses. Findings included:During an observation and interview on 07/06/2025 at 09:30 a.m., revealed the following expired items in Resident #2's personal refrigerator:-one 18-ounce bottle of mayonnaise with expiration date of 06/16/2025;- one 9-ounce package of ham lunch meat with expiration date of 07/02/2025;-one 15-ounce bottle of sandwich spread with expiration date of 12/02/2024;-one 13 -ounce bottled cold coffee drink with expiration date of 02/03/2025;-two 8-ounce supplemental milk shake with expiration date of 02/01/2025;-one 15-ounce bottle of mayonnaise with expiration date of 06/11/2025; and-one 20-ounce strawberry Jell-O with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-19 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain clinical records on each resident in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices that were complete and accurately documented for 2 of 3 residents on the secured unit reviewed for clinical records. (Resident #32 and #7) The facility did not have a physician order for placement on the Secured Unit and an Elopement Assessment upon admission to the Secured Unit for Resident #32. The facility did not have an Elopement Risk Assessment for change in condition, a physician order for placement on the Secured Unit, and a complete care plan for Resident #7. These failures could place residents on the Secured Unit at risk of being inappropriately place and staff not being aware of needs for residents. Findings included: 1. Record review of the face sheet dated 06/19/24 indicated Resident #32 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included vascular dementia (a type of loss of cognitive functioning…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for2 of 4 residents reviewed for infection control. (Residents #102 and #252) The facility did not have appropriate signage indicating Resident #102 was on Droplet Isolation. The facility did not ensure staff implemented appropriate infection control measures while providing care for Resident #252. These failures could place residents, staff, and visitors at risk of exposure to Infectious diseases, decreased health, and/or hospitalization. Findings included: 1. Record review of a face sheet dated 06/17/24 indicated Resident #102 was an [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included MRSA (infections caused by specific bacteria that are resistant to commonly used antibiotics) of the sputum (mixture of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CANTEX CONTINUING CARE — 37 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX