No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Sorrento

2739 Babcock, San Antonio, TX 78229 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 112 certified beds · (210) 616-3250 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (210) 616-3250 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0604, F0609) — most recent Jun 2025Resident-funds citation (F0565)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (50) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★★ 5/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
2701 Babcock Rd · (210) 614-3225 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
5282 Medical Dr Ste 614a · (210) 694-2273 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
5500 Babcock Rd Ste 109 · (726) 222-9996 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Babcock Rd · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased16.1%15.8%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight0.5%3.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.4%0.3%0.9%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.8%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.9%2.4%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.1%3.3%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened6.6%14.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication15.2%18.0%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.7%3.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control8.8%13.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table4.2%9.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.1%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%88.0%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission19.4%25.7%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit6.4%12.3%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.222.171.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.062.061.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 265 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

54.2%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
70.8%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.42U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.20hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.18hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 70.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 137 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.42 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 72% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 26% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF54.2%CMS range 48.0–58.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.6%CMS range 8.9–14.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge70.8%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge70.8%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge71.5%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified97.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting95.8%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge98.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.5%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.0%CMS range 4.8–10.47.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.021.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.56
RN hours/ resident / day
1.28
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.72
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.55
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.36
RN hoursweekends
55.2%
Total nursing turnover
68.8%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 112 beds and averages 104.0 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.55 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.56 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.72 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.98 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.78 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.64 to 0.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 55% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

11
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-08-22)
9
at the previous standard inspection (2024-07-26)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

50 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 40 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-19 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to reasonably accommodate resident #1s needs and preferences by failing to ensure the call light was maintained within reach for 1 of 5 residents reviewed. This had the potential to affect the resident's safety and timely access to assistance.Based on observation, interview and record reviews the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodations of resident needs and preferenceshad the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences except when to do so would endanger the health or safety of the resident or other residents for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for resident safety. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 had access to a call light to summon assistance as needed. This deficient practice could place residents at risk for delayed staff response, unmet needs, injury, and falls.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-11-30 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to consider the views of the resident or family group and act promptly upon the grievances and recommendations of such groups concerning issues of resident care and life in the facility or to demonstrate their response and rationale for such response for 1 of 1 resident council reviewed. The facility failed to follow up on concerns and requests expressed in resident council meetings September 2025 through November 2025. The facility failed to provide the resident council group with a response, actions, and rationale taken regarding their concerns. This failure placed residents at risk of not having their grievances followed up and addressed. Findings included: Review of the Resident Council minutes reflected the following with no documentation of the facility's responses to the grievances:09/30/2025 reflected: 3) New Business New Concerns socks missing.informed about van out of commission due to window shattered. Resident Notes included specific details of numerous articles of clothing missing or lost and not returned once it…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-22 · tag F0640 — pattern
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to transmit encoded, accurate, and complete MDS data to the CMS System for 5 (Resident #2, #44, #54, #136, #310) of 24 residents reviewed for MDS accuracy and completion. Residents #2, #44, #54, #136, and #310 did not have discharge MDS's completed. This failure could result in MDS inaccuracies. The findings included: Record review of Resident #2's Electronic Health Record did not reveal a completed discharge MDS, at least 30 days after discharge. Record review of Resident #44's Electronic Health Record did not reveal a completed discharge MDS, at least 30 days after discharge. Record review of Resident #54's Electronic Health Record did not reveal a completed discharge MDS, at least 30 days after discharge.Record review of Resident #136's Electronic Health Record did not reveal a completed discharge MDS, at least 30 days after discharge.Record review of Resident #310's Electronic Health Record did not reveal a completed discharge MDS, at least 30 days after discharge. Record Review of the facility's policy titled, Electronic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-22 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that residents who required dialysis received such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences, for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #11) reviewed for dialysis services. The facility failed to complete Resident #11's post dialysis assessment on 8/4/2025, 8,6/20205, 8/8/2025, and 8/11/2025. This failure could place residents at risk for neglect by not being assessed and documenting the assessment. The findings included:A record review of Resident #1's admission record dated 8/22/2025 revealed an admission date of 5/21/2025 with diagnoses which included end stage renal disease with dialysis (kidney failure with a medical treatment that acts as artificial kidneys, removing waste products and excess fluid from the blood when the kidneys are unable to perform these functions.) A record review of Resident #11's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-22 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all licensed staff possessed the competency, and specific skill sets necessary to care for resident's needs for all nursing staff for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for competencies. The facility failed to ensure licensed nurses were appropriately updating Resident #12 for fall interventions when they were filling out the Nursing Fall Intervention Checklist. This failure could place residents at risk for harm due to staff who lack the appropriate skills, knowledge, and competencies to safely meet the residents' needs. Findings included: Record Review of Resident #12's admission record, dated 08/22/25, reflected Resident #12 was an [AGE] year-old, initially admitted [DATE] and re-admitted [DATE], with diagnoses to include restlessness and agitation, lack of coordination, muscle weakness, reduced mobility, and need for assistance with personal care. Record Review of Resident #12's MDS assessment for significant change in status, dated 08/01/25,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-22 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and observation, the facility failed to ensure that residents (1 of 1 facility) had suitable, nourishing meals and snacks outside of scheduled meal service times. The facility failed to ensure residents were offered snacks at bedtimes. This failure could affect all residents who received meals served from the facility's only kitchen by placing residents at risk for, unplanned weight loss, and side effects from medication given without food, and diminished quality of life. The findings were:Record review of [NAME] PATIENT MEAL TIMES, revised 5/16, reflected Breakfast, Lunch, Dinner, and no snack time. Interview and observation on 08/21/25 at 07:10 PM, Confidential Resident #144 was observed to not have a snack and they revealed they did not receive a snack, but they would like one. They revealed they did not want the facility to know that they were asking for a snack. Interview and observation on 08/21/25 at 07:10 PM, Confidential Resident #145 was observed to not have a snack…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care in a manner and in an environment that promoted maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #36) reviewed for resident rights. CNA M told Resident #36, just go in your brief and I'll come back to change you when Resident #36 asked to be taken to the restroom. This failure could place residents at risk for diminished quality of life, loss of dignity, and self-worth. The findings included: Record Review of Resident #36's admission Record, dated 08/22/2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old resident with an admission date of 08/08/2025 and diagnoses including: acute and chronic respiratory failure, type 2 diabetes, irritable bowel syndrome, and hyperlipidemia. Record Review of Resident #36's MDS Assessment, dated 08/12/2025, reflected that Resident #36 had, No impairment in her upper and lower extremities and used a walker as a mobility device.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-22 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to promote the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment and to formulate an advance directive for 1 (Resident #25) of 22 residents reviewed for advance directives, in that:Resident #25's OOH-DNR was not signed twice by all parties and was therefore invalid.This deficient practice could result in the resident's wishes regarding end-of-life treatment being dishonored.The findings were:The findings were:Record review of Resident #25's face sheet, dated 08/22/2025, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including: Paraplegia, Unspecified Cirrhosis of Liver, and Sepsis Unspecified Organism.Further review revealed, Advance Directive: DNR (Do Not Resuscitate).Record review of Resident #25's comprehensive MDS assessment, dated 08/08/2025, revealed a BIMS score of 14 which indicated intact cognition.Record review of Resident #25's care plan, initiated 04/14/2025, revealed [Resident #25] requests Code…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-22 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #79) reviewed for environment. Resident #79's recliner's footrest was broken and had a metal piece sticking out of it. This failure could place residents at risk of a diminished quality of life due to an exposure to an environment that is unpleasant, unsanitary, or unsafe. The findings included:Record review of Resident #79's admission Record, dated 08/21/2025, reflected an [AGE] year-old resident, initially admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including muscle wasting and atrophy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type 2 diabetes, and hypothyroidism. Record review of Resident #79's MDS Assessment, dated 08/06/2025, reflected that Resident #79 had a BIMS score of 15, indicating that the resident's cognition was intact. Record review of Resident #79's Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Plan, dated 08/21/2025, reflected that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that included measurable objectives and time frames to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 (Residents #12) of 8 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to implement fall interventions ( Lateral Supports as appropriate, initiated 08/13/25, Provide Reclining W/C as appropriate, initiated 08/13/25, Tilt Wheelchair, initiated 08/13/24, Raised Toilet Seat, initiated 08/13/25) from Resident #12's care plan. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving care and services related to their identified needs to maintain or reach their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial wellbeing. The findings included: Record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 40 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-22 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of any significant medication errors for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #79) reviewed for medication administration. The facility provided Resident #79 with the medication Hydralazine HCl outside of physician parameters. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving the therapeutic effects of their prescribed medications. The findings included: Record review of Resident #79's admission Record, dated 04/04/2025, reflected an [AGE] year-old resident with diagnoses including muscle wasting and atrophy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type 2 diabetes, and hypothyroidism . Record review of Resident #79's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 08/06/2025, reflected Resident #79 was assessed with a BIMS score of 15, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. Record review of Resident #79's Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Plan, dated 08/21/2025, reflected Resident #79 had hypertension with interventions including,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored and locked in compartments under proper temperature controls and permitted only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for 1 of 7 medication carts (800 hall medication cart) reviewed for safe and secure drug storage. The facility failed to ensure the 800-hall medication cart was secured and locked when LVN L utilized it and left it unlocked and unattended. This failure could place residents at risk for harm by accessing medications not prescribed for them, misappropriation, and not receiving the therapeutic effects of the medications as prescribed by their physicians. The finding included: During an observation on 8/19/2025 at 12:16 PM revealed the 800-hall medication cart was in the 800-hallway by a resident's room with a closed door. The medication cart was unattended and out of line of sight by the nurse who was assigned the cart. The drawers of the medication cart were able to be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure the establishment and maintenance of an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 8 [KA1] (Resident #139) residents reviewed for infection isolation protocols. HK S failed to wear a N95 FFR while providing housekeeping services for Resident #139. This failure could place residents and staff at risk for harm by contracting and spreading the Covid-19 virus. The findings included: A record review of Resident #139's admission record dated 8/22/2025, revealed an admission date of 8/15/2025 with diagnoses which included Covid-19 (a contagious disease caused by the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2.) A record review of Resident #139's admission MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #139 was an [AGE] year-old male admitted for covid-19 recovery. A record review of Resident #139's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-17 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to, in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, maintain medical records on each resident that were complete and accurately documented for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for medical records. The facility failed to document all medications administered or withheld in the July 2025 MAR for Resident #1. This failure could place residents at risk of medication errors.Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 7/15/2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included bipolar disorder (a mental health condition causing mood swings), type 2 diabetes mellitus (a condition resulting from the body's resistance to insulin), and hypertension (high blood pressure). Record review of the quarterly MDS submitted 5/6/2025 reflected a BIMS score of 14, which indicated intact cognition. Record review of Resident #1's July 2025 MAR, printed 7/15/2025, revealed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights set forth, that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment and described the services that were to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #6) reviewed for care plans 1. The facility failed to ensure CNA D and CNA E implemented Resident #6's care plan when they used a gait belt instead of a mechanical lift to transfer the resident. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #6 had her oxygen tubing on as care planned. These failures could place residents at risk of a decrease in independence and injury. The findings include Record review of Resident #6's admission Record, dated 07/15/2025, she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remains as free of accident hazards as is possible for 1 of 2 (#6) residents in the 500 hall in that: Resident #6 was not transferred with Mechanical lift (Hoyer) during a transfer as care planned. This could affect all residents with Hoyer transfers and could result in accidents/injury. The Failures included: Record review of Resident #6's admission Record, dated 07/15/2025, she was [AGE] year documented a female resident who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE]. Resident #6 had diagnoses which included acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (a condition where the body, or a region of the body, is deprived of adequate oxygen supply.), history of pneumonia, cognitive communication deficit, limitation of activates due to disability, dementia (a general term for a decline in mental ability severe enough to interfere with daily life), shortness of breath, muscle weakness,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-17 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews failed to ensure the facility must ensure that a resident who needs respiratory care, including tracheostomy care and tracheal suctioning, is provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, the residents' goals and preferences for 1 of 18 (#6) residents with oxygen orders in that: Resident #6 was not wearing her oxygen tubing as ordered. This could affect all resident with Oxygen and could result in residents as ordered. The findings included:Record review of Resident #6's admission Record, dated 07/15/2025, she was [AGE] year documented a female resident who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE]. Resident #6 had diagnoses which included acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (a condition where the body, or a region of the body, is deprived of adequate oxygen supply.), history of pneumonia, cognitive communication deficit, limitation of activates due to disability,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-17 · tag F0810 — isolated
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who needed them and appropriate assistance to ensure that the resident could use the assistance devices when consuming meals and snacks for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #7) reviewed for assistive devices. The facility failed to ensure Resident #7 had her 2 handed drinking cup as ordered. This failure could place residents at risk of a decrease in independence. The findings includeRecord review of Resident #7's [TF1] [RV2] admission record documented a female resident [AGE] years old, who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #7 had diagnoses which included Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominate side (conditions affecting one side of the body. Hemiplegia is characterized by paralysis, while hemiparesis involves weakness, both impacting mobility and daily activities.), need for assistance with personal care, muscle weakness, low…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source, are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the event, if the events result in serious bodily injury, or no later than 24 hours if the events and do not result in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials (including to the State Survey Agency) in accordance with state law through established procedures for 1 of 9 residents (Residents #6) reviewed for abuse and neglect, in that: 1. CNA D observed CNA G yank Resident #6 out of bed and overheard CNA G tell Resident #6 he was going to kill him in Spanish. CNA D did not report the allegation timely and did not report to the Administrator. 2. CNA M observed Resident #6 with wheelchair wheels tied together with plastic bags, restricting Resident #6's mobility, and CNA M did not report the incident to the DON or Administrator.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-20 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the residents had a right to be treated with respect and dignity, including the right to be free from any physical restraints imposed for purposes of convenience, and not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms and to use the least restrictive alternate for the least amount of time and document ongoing re-evaluation of the need for restraints for 1 of 9 residents (Resident #6) whose care was reviewed in that: CNA G restrained Resident #6 by tying trash bags around Resident #6's wheelchair wheels to reduce Resident #6's independent mobility in the facility. This deficit practice could potentially affect residents who required wheelchairs for mobility evidenced by restricting movement, a decline in ADL function and psychological distress. The findings were: Record Review of Resident #6's undated face sheet revealed Resident #6 was a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included a Nontraumatic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-21 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 1 (Resident #1) of 4 residents reviewed for pharmacy services. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's medications administered to him were consumed and were not left in the resident's room. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 received acetaminophen-hydrocodone 10/325 tablets as prescribed by a physician. These failures could place residents at risk for medication error and drug diversion. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 5/21/2025 revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: metabolic encephalopathy (a condition where underlying health issues disrupts the brain's normal function), anxiety disorder and acute kidney failure. Record review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-21 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain medical records that were complete and accurately documented in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 residents reviewed for medical records. The facility failed to ensure LVN A documented Resident #1's acetaminophen-hydrocodone in the electronic medical record. This failure placed resident at risk for delayed or inaccurate medication administration which could result in decline in health and well-being. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 5/21/2025 revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: metabolic encephalopathy (a condition where underlying health issues disrupts the brain's normal function), anxiety disorder and acute kidney failure. Record review of Resident #1's 5-day admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 14 which indicated the resident was cognitively intact with no symptoms of delirium.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-07-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview and record review the facility's Dietary Services failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. 1. The freezer in the kitchen had a packages of frozen foods that were opened and not sealed. 2. The ice machine had black substance that appeared to spread across in the area where ice was dispensed and hard water stains on the outside. 3. The ice machine in the nutrition room of the [NAME] Neighborhood had black substance on the hood of the unit where ice is dispensed. 4. The [NAME] neighborhood had food in the nutrition room in the freezer that was unlabeled. 5. In the dry storage area were gnats flying above the food. 6. There was a drainage trap with a plastic top for cups and paper near on the floor beneath the juice machines. This deficient practice could cause food borne illness for the residents that receive food from the kitchen. The findings included: During initial tour on 07/23/24 09:30 AM of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-26 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — pattern
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to immediately notify, consistent with his or her authority, the resident representative(s) when there was a significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status (that is, a deterioration in health, mental, or psychosocial status in either life-threatening conditions or clinical complications) for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #96), reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to notify Resident #96's resident representative of facility acquired pressure ulcers to his left foot, left lateral leg, left heel, right lateral knee, and left flank From 7/10/24 through 7/22/24 (12 days). This failure could place residents at risk of delays in decision making, and could cause anxiety, grief, and a poor quality of care and life. The findings were: Record review of Resident #96's undated face sheet revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] from an acute care hospital. His diagnoses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-26 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 1 (Resident#15) out of 24 residents reviewed for MDS assessments. Resident #15's quarterly MDS assessment with an ARD of 05/03/2024 inaccurately reflected he was ordered a therapeutic diet when he was ordered a regular diet. This failure could affect residents with MDS assessments and could result in inaccurate care. The findings included: Record review of Resident #15's EMR dated 07/25/2024 reflected he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included: anemia (a blood disorder that occurs when the body doesn't have enough red blood cells or red blood cells do not function properly), chronic kidney disease (kidneys are damaged and cannot filter blood the way they should), atrial fibrillation (a common type of irregular heart rhythm), and functional dyspepsia (a common gastrointestinal disorder defined by symptoms such as burning, pain and fullness). Record review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 2 (Residents#35 and #71) of 24 residents reviewed for care plans. 1. Resident #35's supra-pubic (above the pelvic bone) indwelling urinary catheter (tube inserted into bladder through abdomen) was not reflected in her (current) (undated) comprehensive person-centered care plan. 2. Resident #71's PASRR services was not reflected in his (current) (undated) comprehensive person-centered care plan. These failures could affect residents who reside at the facility and require care and result in missed or inaccurate care. The findings included: 1.Record review of Resident #35's EMR reflected she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included: dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), vascular dementia (a condition that affects the brain due to damaged blood vessels that disrupt blood flow and oxygen supply), and neuropathic bladder (lack of bladder control due to a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan was reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment including both the comprehensive and quarterly review assessments person-centered care plan to reflect the current condition for 2 of 12 residents (Resident #15 and Resident #70) reviewed for care plan revisions. 1.Resident #15's comprehensive person-centered care plan was not revised after his quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] to reflect he was ordered a regular diet instead of a therapeutic. 2.Resident #70's comprehensive person-centered care plan was not revised after his annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] to reflect he was on a therapeutic diet. This failure could affect residents with MDS assessments and could result in missed of required care. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #15's EMR dated 07/25/2024 reflected he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included: anemia (a blood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were secured properly within 1 of 4 medication carts (med cart in hall 100) observed for medication storage. RN B pre-poured medication for Resident #13 then stored it in the top drawer of the medication cart in hallway 100. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the intended therapeutic benefit of the medications as ordered. The findings were: Observation of the medication cart on 100 hall on 07/26/2024 at 10:49 AM revealed a medication cup with one small yellow pill in the cup. Medication cup was not labeled and had no identifying markers to indicate what was within the cup. Medication cart was locked and secured. Interview with RN B on 07/26/2024 at 11:11 AM revealed RN B poured Resident #13's Eliquis 25 mg but when she attempted to pass the medication Resident #13 was sleeping. RN B stated she placed the medication in the medication cart planning to give the medication when the resident woke up for lunch at 11:30 AM. RN B stated that pre-pouring…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-26 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to dispose of garbage and refuse properly to ensure the residents were free from pests and rodents and to live in a safe and clean evironment. Garbage was observed on the ground with used incontinent briefs and other debris on the ground around the dumpsters. This deficient practice could cause the facility to have pests and rodents in and around the facility preventing a clean and safe homelike environment for the residents. The findings included: During an observation 7/23/2024 9:40 AM there was garbage outside around the dumpsters in the back of the building through doors leading from the kitchen with incontinent briefs and plates and other debris on the ground. During an interview 7/23/2024 9:40 AM the NSD stated there was an overflow of garbage in the dumpsters and when the garbage truck dumped the garbage, it fell out on the ground. The NSD stated when she saw the garbage on the ground before the morning meeting that started at 8:00 AM and she did not clean it because she did not want to be late to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to, in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, maintain medical records on each resident that were accurately documented for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #96), reviewed for administration. Wound assessments for Resident #96 were documented as the family was notified when they were not. This failure could result in confusion, decreased continuity of care, and result in anger, frustration, poor quality of life and a delay in decision making. The findings were: Record review of Resident #96's undated face sheet revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] from an acute care hospital. His diagnoses included stage 4 pressure ulcer to sacral region (area just above the tailbone with Full-thickness skin loss extends through the fascia with considerable tissue loss. There may be muscle, bone, tendon, or joint involvement.), Type 2 diabetes without complications (chronic condition that affects…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-26 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolated
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY During observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program so that the facility is free of pests and rodents. In the dry storage area of the kitchen, about 5 gnats were observed flying around the food on the top shelf near packages of pasta and dry foods. This deficient practice could put residents at risks of food borne illness due infection control for the residents eating food from the kitchen. The findings were: During observation 07/23/24 09:30 AM gnats were in the dry storage room flying around foods on the top shelf. During an interview 07/23/24 09:30 AM the NSD stated ,oh no. I will take care of this right away because that is not clean to have bugs anywhere around food. She stated she had not requested for pest control services on the maintenance log for the gnats. During an interview 7/26/2024 at 10:03AM the NSD stated gnats may come because an area was not clean, maybe from the drains in the kitchen. She stated it would be due to improper…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-19 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' right to formulate an advance directive for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for advanced directives, in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #2's Out-of-Hospital Do Not Resuscitate (OOH DNR) was honored. This failure could place residents at-risk of having their end of life wishes dishonored, and of having CPR performed against their wishes. The findings included: Record review of Resident #2's face sheet, dated [DATE] revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hemiplegia following nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage affecting the left non dominate side (partial or total paralysis on one side of the boday after a brain bleed), cerebrovascular disease, and seizures. The advanced directive was blank on the face sheet. Record review of Resident #2's admission MDS assessment, dated [DATE] revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired for daily decision-making…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-19 · tag F0620 — isolated
    Not require residents to give up Medicare or Medicaid benefits, or pay privately as a condition of admission; and must tell residents what care they do not provide.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an admission policy was implemented for 1 of 5 Resident (Resident #2), in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #2's RP was provided admission documents on admission. This deficient practice could place residents at risk who are not being informed of the admission requirements, services, and processes. Findings Include: Record review of Resident #2's face sheet, dated 7/19/24 revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hemiplegia following nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage affecting the left non dominate side (partial or total paralysis on one side of the boday after a brain bleed), cerebrovascular disease, and seizures. The advanced directive was blank on the face sheet. Record review of Resident #2's admission MDS assessment, dated 7/16/24 revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired for daily decision-making skills. Record review Resident #2's admission…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-19 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to incorporate the recommendations from the PASRR level II determination and the PASRR evaluation report into a resident's assessment, care planning and transitions of care for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for PASRR. The facility failed to submit NFSS forms timely to the TMHP Long Term Care Portal for Resident #1 to ensure payment for specialized services throught the PASRR program. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving specialized services in a timely manner. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's admission record, dated 07/19/24, revealed a [AGE] year-old male who admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Down Syndrome (a genetic chromosome 21 disorder causing developmental and intellectual delays), hydrocephalus (a buildup of fluid in the cavities deep with the brain), contracture of muscle, left lower leg, muscle weakness, and mixed receptive-expressive language disorder (a communication disorder…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-19 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed implement a baseline care plan for each resident that includes the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality care for 1 of 1 newly admitted residents (Residents #2) reviewed for baseline care plan. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2's baseline care plan contained the correct code status. These deficient practices could place residents at-risk for decreased quality of life, improper care, and injury. The findings were: Record review of Resident #2's face sheet, dated [DATE] revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hemiplegia following nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage affecting the left non dominate side, cerebrovascular disease, and seizures. The advanced directive was blank on the face sheet. Record review of Resident #2's admission MDS assessment, dated [DATE] revealed the resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-19 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident that are-accurately documented for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for accurate medical records in that: The facility failed ensure Resident #2's emergency contacts were updated and accurate. The deficient practices place residents at risk of misinformation about professional care provided. The findings included: Record review of Resident #2's face sheet, dated [DATE] revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hemiplegia following nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage affecting the left non dominate side (partial or total paralysis on one side of the boday after a brain bleed), cerebrovascular disease, and seizures. The emergency contacts listed were family member A and family member B. Record review of Resident #2's admission MDS assessment, dated [DATE] revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired for daily decision-making skills.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-05 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident and the resident's representative/s of the discharge and the reasons for the move in writing and in a language and manner they understand, failed to update the recipients of the notice as soon as practicable once the updated information became available, and failed to send a copy of the notice to a representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman for 1 of 5 residents (Residents #1) reviewed for discharge. The facility failed to notify Resident #1's RP in writing and did not notify the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman by phone or in writing of Resident #1's discharge due to safety concerns. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of being discharged and not allowed to return to the facility, causing a disruption in their care and services and potential decline in health. Findings included: Closed record review of Resident #1's undated face sheet revealed the resident was a [AGE] year old female admitted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-05 · tag F0626 — isolated
    Permit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to establish and follow written policy on permitting residents to return to the facility after they were hospitalized for one (Resident #1) of five residents reviewed for transfer/discharge. The facility failed to readmit Resident #1 to the facility after she was sent to the hospital on [DATE]. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of being discharged and not allowed to return to the facility, causing a disruption in their care and services and potential decline in health. Findings included: Closed record review of Resident #1's undated face sheet revealed the resident was a [AGE] year old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included spondylosis of the lumbar region (age-related degeneration of the vertebrae and disks of the lower back), vascular dementia (problems with reasoning, planning, judgment, memory and other thought processes caused by brain damage from impaired blood flow to the brain) and borderline…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's environment remained as free of accident hazards as was possible for two of six residents (Resident #s 2 and 3), reviewed for accidents and hazards: The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 did not have 15 disposable razors stored in his restroom drawer and a pair of scissors. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3 did not have 5 disposable razors stored in his restroom drawer. These failures placed residents at risk of injury. The findings: Resident #2 Record review of Resident #2's electronic facesheet revealed Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was [AGE] years of age. Further review revealed Resident #2's diagnoses included: vascular dementia with behavioral disturbance, anxiety disorder, cognitive communication disorder, and recurrent depression. Record review of Resident #2's MDS (Comprehensive), printed 6/14/2024, revealed Resident #2 had a BIMs Score of 9 which indicated moderate cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-05 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 30-day discharge notices included a statement of the resident's right to appeal which included the name, address (mailing and email), and telephone number of the entity which receives such requests: and information on how to obtain an appeal form and assistance in completing the form and submitting the appeal hearing request and name, address (mailing and email) and telephone number of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman for 3 of 3 residents (Resident's #1, #2, and #3) reviewed for discharge. The facility failed to include in 30-day discharge notices to Resident's #1, #2, and #3 the email or address for the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman or the email address and phone number of the agency in which to file an appeal or instructions or information on how to file the appeal. These failures could affect residents by placing them at risk of being discharged and not having access to available advocacy services, discharge/transfer options,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-05 · tag F0660 — pattern
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement an effective person-centered discharge plan that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs for 3 of 3 residents (Resident's #1, #2 and #3) reviewed for comprehensive care plans in that: 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's care plan included discharge planning and goals. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2's care plan included discharge planning and goals. 3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3's care plan included discharge planning and goals. These failures could affect residents and place them at risk of their discharge wishes not being honored and not receiving appropriate treatment and services on discharge: The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 4/04/2024 revealed an admission date of 2/02/2023 with diagnoses which included: type 2 diabetes mellitus with complications, end stage renal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-05 · tag F0839 — pattern
    Employ staff that are licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with state laws.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure professional staff were licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with applicable State laws for 1 of 8 staff (LVN A reviewed for staff qualifications. The facility failed to ensure LVN A renewed his nursing license before the expiration date in order to practice nursing in the State of Texas. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving care and services from staff who were properly licensed The findings included: Record review of LVN A personnel file revealed a Texas LVN nursing license which had expired on [DATE]. Record review of the Texas Board of Nursing website license verification portal on [DATE] at 12:16 p.m. revealed LVN A Texas nursing license was listed as delinquent with a license expiration date of [DATE]. During an observation/interview on [DATE] at 10:10 a.m., LVN A was observed in the nursing facility with a name badge on. LVN A stated he was currently on duty as an LVN. He stated his license…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-05 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were permitted to remain in the facility, and not transfer or discharge the resident from the facility unless the transfer or discharge was necessary for the resident's welfare and the resident's needs could not be met in the facility and failed to ensure a resident was not transferred or discharged while the appeal was pending for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for discharges, in that: The facility failed to wait to transfer Resident #3 to another facility until he was out of Medicaid pending status. These failures could result in residents being discharged without appropriate notice and while they were waiting for approval from Medicaid could place residents at risk being discharged against their wishes. The findings were: Record review of Resident #3's face sheet dated 4/04/2024 revealed an admission date of 4/11/2023 with diagnoses which included: heart failure, type 2 diabetes mellitus and generalized osteo-arthritis and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needs respiratory care, is provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #4) reviewed for respiratory care in that: The facility did not ensure Resident #4's oxygen nasal cannula tubing (a small, flexible tube that contains two open prongs intended to sit just inside the nostrils) was dated, as ordered by the physician. This deficient practice could affect residents who receive oxygen therapy and result in infection and respiratory compromise. The findings were: Record review of Resident #4's face sheet, dated 3/12/24, revealed resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of: hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease with heart failure and with stage five chronic kidney/end stage renal disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus, dependence on renal dialysis, and anemia in chronic kidney disease. Record review of Resident #4's comprehensive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-13 · tag F0712 — isolated
    Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure residents were seen by a physician for the resident's initial comprehensive visit for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) whose care was reviewed in that: Resident #1's initial comprehensive visit was not conducted by a physician. This deficient practice could affect residents and could lead to a decline in health status. The findings were: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 3/12/24, revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. There was no diagnoses listed on this face sheet. Further record review of this document revealed Resident #1's attending physician was Physician F and Resident #1's care level was Skilled Care. Record review of Resident #1's care plan, dated 3/12/24, revealed Resident #1 had the following diagnoses: acute cholecystitis [an inflammation of the gallbladder], acute kidney failure, unspecified, anxiety disorder, unspecified, atypical atrial flutter [an abnormal heartbeat], and constipation. Record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for infection control in that: After cleansing Resident #3's perineal area, CNA D did not perform hand hygiene before applying Resident #3's clean brief. This deficient practice could affect residents and place them at risk for infection. The findings were: Record review of Resident #3's face sheet, dated 3/12/24 revealed Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of sepsis [a condition in which the body's extreme response to an infection become life-threatening], unspecified, urinary tract infection, diabetes mellitus with diabetic nephropathy [deterioration of kidney function due to diabetes], and essential (primary) hypertension. Record review of Resident #3's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living were provided with the necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene for 1 of 2 resident (Resident #1) reviewed for assistance with ADL care, in that: The facility failed to prevent Resident #1 from missing scheduled showers between 10/20/2023 and 11/02/2023. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The noncompliance began on 10/20/2023 and ended on 11/02/2023. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. This failure could place residents who require assistance from staff for personal hygiene at risk of not receiving care and services contributing to overall poor hygiene, risk of experiencing a diminished quality of life, and possible skin infections. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 11/8/2023 reflected a [AGE] year-old resident admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis of sepsis due to other specified staphylococcus…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-02 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the notice to residents was provided when changes in coverage were made to items and services covered by Medicare as soon as reasonable possible was provided to 2 of 2 residents (Resident#42, and Resident #76) reviewed for Medicare/Medicaid. The facility failed to give Resident #42 and Resident #76 a Skilled Nursing Facility advance Beneficiary Notice (SNF ABN) when discharged from skilled services at the facility prior to covered days being exhausted. This failure could affect residents who use skilled services and could place them at risk of not being aware of changes to provided services. The findings included: Record review of Resident #42's face sheet, dated 06/02/2023, revealed the resident was admitted [DATE] with diagnosis that included: cerebral infarction (stroke), altered mental status (change in mental function), hypertension (high blood pressure), Parkinson's disease (chronic and progressive movement disorder that initially causes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-02 · tag F0640 — isolated
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was electronically completed and transmitted to the CMS System within 14 days after completion for 2 of 2 Residents (Residents #50 and #54) reviewed for transmitting assessments. 1. Resident #50's quarterly MDS assessment was not completed and transmitted within 14 days of completion. 2. Resident #54's death in facility MDS assessment was not completed and transmitted within 14 days of completion. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of not having records completed and submitted in a timely manner as required. The findings included: 1. Review of Resident #50's face sheet, dated 06/01/2023 revealed an admission date of 06/15/2021 with diagnoses that included: acute on chronic diastolic (congestive) heart failure, type 2 diabetes mellitus with unspecified complications, hyperlipidemia, unspecified atrial fib, hypertension (high blood pressure), major depressive disorder recurrent psych symptoms, obstructive hydrocephalus, atrial flutter, and anxiety disorder. Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an Infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infection for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #47) reviewed for infection control, in that: CNA B failed to wash or sanitize her hands or change her gloves after touching the trash can and before starting catheter care. This deficient practice could place residents at-risk for infection due to improper care practices. The findings included: Record review of Resident #47's face sheet, dated 06/01/2023, revealed an admission date of 04/15/2023, with diagnoses which included: Urinary tract infection(an infection in any part of the urinary system), Chronic kidney disease(gradual loss of kidney function), Hypertension(High blood pressure), Hyperlipidemia(Elevated level of any or all lipids(fat) in the blood), Sepsis(blood poisoning) Record review of Resident #47's admission MDS assessment, dated 04/22/2023,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CANTEX CONTINUING CARE — 37 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 53.1-1.1 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.9-0.9 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.9-0.9 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.3+0.7 vs chain
The other 36 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.1★, per CMS)
1 of 5The Carlyle at Stonebridge ParkSouthlake, TX 1 of 5The Colonnades at Reflection BayPearland, TX 1 of 5The CrescentSugar Land, TX 2 of 5Ashford GardensHouston, TX 2 of 5Magnolia ManorGroves, TX 2 of 5Palomino PlaceMesquite, TX 2 of 5Park Valley Inn Health CenterRound Rock, TX 2 of 5San RemoRichardson, TX 2 of 5Sundance Inn Health CenterNew Braunfels, TX 2 of 5The Villa At Mountain ViewDallas, TX 2 of 5Windemere At Westover HillsSan Antonio, TX 2 of 5Windsor GardensLancaster, TX 3 of 5Bel Air at TeravistaRound Rock, TX 3 of 5Fort Bend Healthcare CenterRosenberg, TX 3 of 5HollymeadFlower Mound, TX 3 of 5LarkspurLufkin, TX 3 of 5Mill CreekSilsbee, TX 3 of 5Prairie EstatesFrisco, TX 3 of 5Renaissance Care CenterGainesville, TX 3 of 5Solera at West HoustonHouston, TX 3 of 5The Bradford At BrooksideLivingston, TX 3 of 5The Broadmoor at Creekside ParkThe Woodlands, TX 3 of 5The Harrison at HeritageFort Worth, TX 3 of 5The Manor at SeagovilleSeagoville, TX 4 of 5Beacon HillDenison, TX 4 of 5CarraraPlano, TX 4 of 5Oakwood Manor Nursing HomeVidor, TX 4 of 5The Belmont At Twin CreeksAllen, TX 4 of 5The Madison on MarshCarrollton, TX 4 of 5Woodville Health And Rehabilitation CenterWoodville, TX 5 of 5Bonne ViePort Arthur, TX 5 of 5Coronado At Stone OakSan Antonio, TX 5 of 5Crestview CourtCedar Hill, TX 5 of 5Laurel CourtAlvin, TX 5 of 5Palma RealMathis, TX 5 of 5Riverside OaksVictoria, TX

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
HOOPER, GRADYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 12/01/2015
SORRENTO CONTINUING CARE CENTER LTD. CO.OrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2023
EVANS, ROBERTIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/25/2024
SHELTON, ROLANDAIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 03/25/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$5.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-5.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1
Related-party expense0% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 44%Medicare 23%Other / private 33%

This home reported $1 paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$344per resident / day
operating cost
$10,454per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$326per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Texas
$5,627/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,666/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 676378. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-22, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next