Prairie Estates

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 162 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 59.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 67 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.19 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 19% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 180 beds and averages 155.7 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 24 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.38 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.50 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.92 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.83 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.61 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.50 to 0.51 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2023-09-27 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
  Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and records review, the facility failed to ensure personnel provided basic life support, which included CPR, to a resident requiring such emergency care subject to the resident's advance directives for one (Resident #1) of four residents reviewed for cardiopulmonary resuscitation. On [DATE], LVN A found Resident #1 unresponsive. LVN A said she a pulse was not felt, and a heartbeat was faintly heard. LVN A did not initiate CPR to Resident #1. LVN A failed to review Resident #1's Advance Directives choice, Full Code, when she discovered Resident #1 unresponsive. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on [DATE]. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 5:06 PM. While the IJ was lowered on [DATE], the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and severity level of actual harm that is not IJ due to the facility continuing to monitor the implementation and effectiveness of the corrective systems. This deficient practice could affect all residents who requested a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2025-01-16 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections to the extent possible for one (Resident #75) of four residents reviewed for indwelling urinary catheters. The facility failed to provide physician ordered catheter care to Resident #75 and failed to notify Resident #75's NP when she experience pain and discomfort from her urinary catheter. These failures led to Resident # 75 experiencing increased pain and discomfort from her catheter and placed Resident # 75 at risk for urethral tears, dislodging of the catheter, and urinary tract infections. Findings included: Review of Resident #75's quarterly MDS Resident assessment dated [DATE] revealed she was a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her active diagnoses included, coronary artery disease (heart disease), hypertension (high blood pressure), neurogenic bladder(lack of bladder control due to brain, spinal cord, or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident had the right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to Housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #14) reviewed for environmental conditions. The facility failed to ensure Resident #14's toilet seat was in good condition and was not broken. This failure could place residents at risk for injury and a decreased quality of life.Findings included: Observation and interview on 03/24/26 at 10:58 AM with Resident #14 stated his toilet seat had been broken for about a week. Observation of Resident #14's toilet seat in his bathroom revealed it was broken and the left side was not connected to the toilet. Resident #14 said he had told the aide and nurse about it being broken and was told someone would be by to fix it, but they never did. Resident #14 said he was scared to sit on the toilet because he did not want to fall and hurt himself. Resident #14 said he had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 of 31 residents (Resident #24) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to develop a care plan with measurable objectives and timeframes to address Resident #39's colostomy (an opening in the abdominal wall that allows waste to pass into a removeable pouch). This failure could place residents at risk of receiving inadequate interventions not individualized to their care needs. Findings included:Review of Resident #24's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included paraplegia (impairment or loss of motor sensory function in the lower half of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0694 — isolated
  Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure parenteral fluids were administered consistent with professional standards of practice and in accordance with physician orders, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's goals and preferences for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #137) reviewed for intravenous medication. The facility failed to ensure Resident #137's intravenous medication bag and tubing were labeled with the date, time, and initials.These failures could place residents at risk for medication error, delay in medication administration, infections and cross-contamination. Findings include:Findings include:Record review of Resident #137's annual MDS Assessment, dated [DATE], reflected an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #137's diagnoses included chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (lungs cannot adequately transfer oxygen into the blood), hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol), Non-Alzheimer's Dementia (brain…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the drugs and biologicals used in the facility must be labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, and include the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, and the expiration date when applicable) to meet the needs of each resident for 2 of 5 medication carts (Halls 100 medication Aide medication cart and Hall 900 nurses' medication cart) reviewed for medication storage .1. The facility failed to ensure expired medications were removed from the Hall 100 medication aide cart and Hall 900 nurses' medication cart. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the therapeutic benefit of medication or an adverse drug reaction.Observation on 03/25/2026 at 1:19 PM, Hall 100 medication aide cart revealed one bottle of Calcium 500mg/Vitamin D 400unit (used as dietary supplement designed to support bone health and improve calcium absorption with an expiry date of December 2025.Interview on 03/25/2026…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the storage of all drugs and biologicals were in locked compartments under proper temperature controls, and permit only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #19) reviewed for storage of medications.The facility failed to ensure Resident #19's Oxycodone-Acetaminophen tablet was not left on his over-bed table in his room by staff.This failure could affect residents by placing residents at risk of consuming unsafe medications left at bedside unattended.Findings included:Findings included:Record review of Resident #19's face-sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old male initially admitted to facility on 10/09/2023 and readmitted on [DATE]. His diagnosis included: Unspecified Dementia, Mild Without Behavioral Disturbance, Psychotic Disturbance, Mood Disturbance, and Anxiety (excessive and persistent fears or worries that interfere with daily life); Chronic Ischemic Heart Disease, Unspecified (long-term…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing and mental and psychological needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for one of five residents (Resident #1) reviewed for care planning.1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's care plan had a person-centered approach to address her evolving medical and dietary needs.2. The facility failed develop a care plan to address a hospitalization for pneumonia and a return the facility with continued textured diet orders, aspiration precautions and additional antibiotic treatment.These failures could place residents at risk of being inconsistently monitored, possible delayed identification of swallowing difficulty, and lack of coordinated food/dietary interventions during meals.Findings included:Record review of Resident #1's Face…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for one (Resident #1) of five residents reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's comprehensive care plan addressed their oral care and condition including the resident's risk and/or underlying causes (to the extent possible) of the resident's dental/oral condition and the impact upon the resident's function, mood, and cognition. This failure could place residents at risk of receiving inadequate interventions not individualized to their mental health and dental health care needs.Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's annual MDS dated [DATE], reflected the [AGE] year-old female resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a BIMS score of 13, indicating…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-24 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
  Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide or obtain from an outside source, routine and 24-hour emergency dental services to meet the needs of 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for dental needs. The facility failed to obtain dental services for Resident #1, who had a broken tooth and oversized dentures. This failure could place the residents at risk for not having their dental needs met.Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's annual MDS dated [DATE], reflected the [AGE] year-old female resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a BIMS score of 13, indicating the resident was cognitively intact but at risk for mild memory/recall difficulties. Diagnoses included: recurrent depressive disorder (persistent sadness, loss of interest, and low energy that affects daily life), anxiety disorder (ongoing excessive worry and nervousness that interferes with daily life), diabetes (a condition where the body can't properly use sugar for energy, leading to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchens reviewed for kitchen sanitation. The facility failed to ensure food was properly stored in the facility's kitchen. These failures could place residents at risk for food-borne illness. Findings Included: Observation of the facility's refrigerator on 01/14/25 beginning at 9:07 AM revealed: - 1 open bin of raw chicken open and exposed to air; and - 1 open bag of ham. Observation of a prep table located in the open area of the facility's kitchen on 01/14/25 beginning at 9:18 AM revealed: -1 box of bananas dated 01/06/25 with black spots and a bug; and - 1 box of bananas dated 01/08/25 with fuzzy white spots. An interview with the Dietary Supervisor on 01/16/25 at 4:47 PM revealed she completed walk throughs of the kitchen daily and before she left. She stated she checked produce in between food truck delivery days (Tuesdays and Thursdays). She stated she was responsible for ensuring…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure all Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) level 1 residents with mental illness were provided with a PASRR level 2 evaluation for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #91), reviewed for resident assessment. Resident #91's PASRR level 1 screening form did not reflect mental illness and the resident did not have a PASRR level II evaluation when Resident #91 had a diagnosis of schizophrenia. This could place residents at risk of not receiving necessary specialized services to meet their individual needs. Findings included: Record review of Resident #91's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed she was a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included unspecified schizophrenia (a condition where a patient's symptoms do not meet the full diagnostic criteria for schizophrenia or another more specific psychotic disorder), major depressive disorder (a mental health condition that involves persistent feelings of sadness,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$24,587 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $11,190 — penalty dated 2025-01-16
• $13,397 — penalty dated 2023-09-27
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-02-14 for 14 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CANTEX CONTINUING CARE — 37 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX