Bel Air at Teravista

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

57.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 342 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 52.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 161 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.48 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 79% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 112 beds and averages 101.7 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.38 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.67 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.97 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.02 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.52 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.69 to 0.62 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 43% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-01-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure residents remained free from accidents, hazards and each resident received adequate supervision and assistance when being transferred for 1 of 7 residents reviewed for accidents and hazards. CNA A failed to transfer Resident #1 received assistance with the mechanical lift on 12/14/2024. This failure could result in residents receiving injuries. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The IJ began on 12/14/24 and ended on 12/16/24. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's Face sheet dated 12/31/2024 revealed she was an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included cognitive communication deficit (problems with communication), pressure ulcer of right heel (wound on heel), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), difficulty walking, repeated falls, lack of coordination, osteoarthritis (joint disease), cerebrovascular disease (a range…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-08-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents environment remained as free of accident hazards as is possible and ensure each resident received adequate supervision for one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for accidents and hazards. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 did not elope from the facility on 08/22/24. She was found less than two hours later approximately one mile away at a gas station on a busy street. She had a fall which resulted in a swollen face and a cheek abrasion. This noncompliance was identified as PNC IJ. The deficient practice began on 08/22/24 and ended on 08/23/24. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. This deficient practice placed residents at risk for, falls, injuries, and hospitalization. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's undated face sheet reflected an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cognitive impairment, unspecified…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · G2026-06-04 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that pain management was provided to residents who required such services, consistent with professional standards or practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for 1 of 6 (Resident # 128) residents reviewed for pain management. The facility failed to administer pain medication to Resident #128, who had pancreatic cancer, from the time she was admitted [DATE] at 7:30 p.m. to 6/2/26 at 10:00 a.m. This failure could place the residents at risk of delayed healing, physical, mental, and psychological distress.Findings included: Record review of Resident #128's face sheet, dated 06/03/2026, reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of malignant neuroendocrine tumors (pancreatic cancer), secondary malignant neoplasm (cancerous tumor) of liver and intrahepatic bile duct (a network of tiny, branching tubes located inside the liver), and pain. Record review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-06-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene for 3 of 10 residents (Resident #13, Resident #48, and Resident #86) reviewed for ADL care. The facility failed to ensure, Resident #48, and Resident #86 did not have unwanted facial hair.The facility failed to ensure Resident #13 was changed or toileted every two hours. This failure could place residents at risk of embarrassment and diminished quality of life.Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #13's face sheet, dated 06/03/2026, reflected an [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE]. Resident #13 had diagnoses which included: traumatic subdural hemorrhage without loss of consciousness (blood collects between the brain and the skull's outermost protective covering following a head injury), history of falling and syncope (fainting or passing out.) chronic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-06-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure, based on the comprehensive assessment of the resident, that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's choices for 3 of 7 residents (Resident #28, Resident #13, and Resident #127) reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to ensure: Nursing staff weighed Resident #13 and Resident #127 every day according to their care plan and physician's orders due to their CHF diagnosis. Nursing staff provided wound care for Resident #28 according to her care plan and physician's orders. These failures could place the residents at risk of fluid overload, infection, and hospitalization.Findings included. 1.Record review of Resident #13's face sheet, dated 06/03/2026, reflected [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: traumatic subdural hemorrhage without loss of consciousness (blood collects…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-06-04 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received and the facility provided food and drink that was palatable, attractive and at a safe and appetizing temperature for all residents who consumed foods orally from the only kitchen in the facility that: The facility failed to provide palatable food that was attractive or appetizing to residents who complained the food did not look or taste good and that it was frequently cold. These failures could place residents at risk of decreased food intake, hunger, unwanted weight loss, food borne illnesses, and diminished quality of life.During an interview on 06/02/2026 at 1:05 p.m., it was revealed that Resident #18's only complaint was that her soup was too salty. During an interview on 06/02/2026 at 3:29 p.m., Resident #17 stated his meals were served cold almost every day. The resident stated he ate in his room daily. The resident stated his meals were rarely ever hot or warm enough. During an interview on 06/02/2026 at 3:34 p.m., Resident #118 stated her meals were served cold often.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for Food and Nutrition Services.The facility failed to ensure dietary staff followed proper handwashing and glove use.These deficient practices could place residents at risk for food borne illness.Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for Food and Nutrition Services.The facility failed to ensure dietary staff followed proper handwashing and glove use.These deficient practices could place residents at risk for food borne illness.The findings were:During an interview on 06/02/2026 at 9:11 a.m., it was revealed that DA Q has been employed at this facility since March of 2026, she has a current Food Handlers Certificate, and she has been…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe and sanitary environment to prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 5 of 12 residents (Resident #128, Resident #90, Resident #41, Resident #37, and Resident #60) reviewed for infection control. Facility failed to ensure: TN L sanitized the over-the-bed table prior to setting supplies on it for Resident #90's wound care, did not put on PPE (gown) before providing care to Resident #128 and Resident #90 and did not sanitize her hands two times between changing gloves during Resident #90's wound care. MA D sanitized her hands between changing gloves after performing eye drops for Resident #60 and failed to sanitize the blood pressure cuff between Resident #37 and Resident #41. These failures could place the residents at risk of infection transmission, sepsis, and hospitalization. Findings included: 1.Record review of Resident #128's face sheet, dated 06/03/2026, reflected a [AGE]…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-01 · tag F0552 — isolated
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident had the right to be informed of, his or her treatment which includingrights.ht to be informed in advance, by the physician or other practitioner or professional, of the risk and benefits of proposed care, of treatment and treatment alternatives or treatment options and to choose the alternative or option he or she preferred, for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for resident rights .The facility failed to provide information to Resident #1's FM about the change of medication from Lantus (Insulin) to Metformin and its risks and benefits and other alternative options available.This failure could place residents at risk of receiving medications without their prior knowledge or consent.The findings include:Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 04/01/26 revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE]. His diagnoses were dementia, dysphasia (swallowing difficulty), type 2 diabetes, pain, hypothyroidism (Low thyroid…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-01-12 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors for 1 of 2 residents (R #1) reviewed for medication administration.The facility failed to administer R#1's physician ordered 4 units of Insulin Lispro Injection solution, prescribed to treat Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, (elevated blood sugar levels) on 12/19,12/22,12/23,12/24,12/25,12/28,12/29 and 12/30/2025. These deficient practices placed residents at risk for not receiving the therapeutic effects of their prescribed medications.Findings include: Record review of R1's admission record reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R1 had diagnoses which included TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS WITHOUT COMPLICATIONS (elevated blood sugar levels), HYPOTHYROIDISM (when the thyroid gland doesn't make enough thyroid hormone), BIPOLAR DISORDER (a condition that causes extreme mood swings). ANXIETY DISORDER (Characterized by feelings of fear or apprehension…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-12 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 2 residents (R#2), reviewed for pharmaceutical services, in that:The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 had her physician ordered Robaxin (muscle relaxer) 1 500 mg tablet by mouth every 8 hours for pain, available on 01/10/2026.This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving medication as ordered. Findings included: Review of Resident #2 admission record dated 01-08-2026 revealed a [AGE] year-old female that was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included Type 2 Diabetes, Chronic kidney disease, Nonalcoholic cirrhosis of the liver (Chronic inflammation of the liver causing gradual scarring), Compression Fracture of the Lumbar Vertebra, (vertebra collapse due to excessive pressure), Malignant breast cancer (producing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-11-21 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who needed respiratory care were provided with such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, for 5 of 7 residents (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, and Resident #5) reviewed for quality of care.The facility failed to ensure Resident #1, Resident #2 , Resident #3, Resident #4, Resident #5's nebulizing masks and/or oxygen canulas were bagged for sanitation when not in use on 11/06/25.This failure could place residents at risk for respiratory infections. The findings included:Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 11/06/25, revealed a [AGE] year-old male, admitted on [DATE]. His diagnoses were multiple fractures of ribs, pulmonary embolism (block by blood clot in lung's artery), Parkinson's disease (kind of neurological disorder), acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (less oxygen), abnormalities of gait and mobility and muscle wasting and atrophy. Resident #1 was sent…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-09 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to immediately inform the resident; consult with the resident's physician; and notify, consistent with his or her authority, the resident representative(s) when there is a significant change in the resident's physical status for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 residents review for resident rights. RN A failed to notify Resident #1's family when a new medication order for antibiotics, to treat a urinary tract infection, was initiated on 06/14/2024. This failure put residents at risk for not having their representative notified and aware of their current medical status. Findings included: Review of the undated face sheet for Resident #1 reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included retention of urine unspecified, pain unspecified, dementia (a general term for a decline in cognitive function that interferes with daily life) in other disease classified elsewhere, acute kidney failure (a sudden and rapid decline in kidney…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$19,188 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $10,361 — penalty dated 2025-01-14
• $8,827 — penalty dated 2024-08-24

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CANTEX CONTINUING CARE — 37 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1 paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX