The Manor at Seagoville

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 41 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.15 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 12% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 90 beds and averages 68.8 residents a day — about 76% occupied, or roughly 21 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.97 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.41 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.39 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.60 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.12 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.44 to 0.35 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 59% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

32 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · K2025-07-14 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — pattern
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident's drug regimen did not have an excessive dose for 1 (Resident #1) of 4 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident's drug regimen did not have an excessive dose for 1 (Resident #1) of 4 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility failed to identify potential hazards and effects of medications and failed to have internal systems in place to prevent Resident #1 from receiving high doses of extended release Morphine and Oxycodone (opioid analgesics used to treat moderate to severe ongoing pain). This resulted in Resident #1's admission to the intensive care unit, on 07/09/2025, in critical condition requiring a Narcan (antidote for opioid overdose) drip to reverse the effects of medication received at the facility. The non-compliance and an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was identified on 07/13/2025. The IJ was removed on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · J2023-12-07 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free of significant medication errors for one of nine residents (Resident #1) reviewed for significant medication errors. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was free of significant medication errors when Heparin was administered incorrectly . The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The IJ began on 11/18/2023 and ended 11/18/2023. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the therapeutic effect of their medications as ordered by the physician. Findings include: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 11/19/23, reflected an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1's relevant diagnoses included embolism and thrombosis of unspecified artery (blood clot.) Record review of the facility Intake Investigation Worksheet, dated 11/18/2023, reflected Incident Details . [Resident #1] received…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible for 2 (200 Hall and 300 hall) out of 3 hallways reviewed for accidents and hazards. 1.The facility failed to ensure that the mechanical lift on 200 hall and 300 halls were locked and secured when not in use.This failure could place residents at risk of falls and/or injuries. Observation on 04/01/26 at 11:17 AM of 300 hall revealed an unlocked and unsecured mechanical lift parked on the doorway of room [ROOM NUMBER] residents were observed maneuvering their wheelchairs around the Hoyer lift. Observation on 04/01/26 at 10:24 AM of 200 hall revealed an unlocked and unsecured mechanical lift parked on the doorway of room [ROOM NUMBER] residents were observed maneuvering their wheelchairs around the Hoyer lift. During an interview on 4/1/26 at 10:35 AM with RN A revealed that Hoyer /mechanical lifts should be stored away from high traffic areas where residents…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-01 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure that enteral feeding and administration sets were properly labeled consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 (Residents #1) of 3 residents reviewed for enteral feeding. The facility failed to ensure the G tube (a method of delivering liquid nutrition directly into the stomach or small intestine when a person cannot eat enough by mouth) feeding was properly labeled and dated before administering the feeding to Resident#1. This failure could put the residents at risk of inaccurate delivery of prescribed nutrition.Record review of Resident #1's MDS assessment, dated [DATE], reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her BIMs score was 12 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Her diagnoses included hypertension (is a chronic condition where the force of blood against artery walls is consistently too high), aphasia (a neurological disorder caused by brain damage that impairs a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-01 · tag F0694 — isolated
  Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure parenteral fluids must be administered consistent with professional standards of practice and in accordance with physician orders, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's goals and preferences for 1 (Residents #1) of 2 residents reviewed for parenteral and intravenous care.The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's IV antibiotic was initialed and labeled with the date/time of administration.The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's IV tubing was dated, per the facility policy, when the IV antibiotic was administered.This failure could put the residents at risk of medication error and infectionRecord review of Resident #1's MDS assessment, dated 03/17/2026, reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her BIMs score was 12 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Her diagnoses included hypertension (is a chronic condition where the force of blood against artery walls is…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-01 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure respiratory care, including tracheostomy care and tracheal suctioning, is provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, for 1 of 4 residents (Resident#2) reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to ensure that Resident#2's oxygen tubing, and humidifier were changed per physician's orders. This failure had the potential to affect residents receiving oxygen therapy by increasing their risk of health -associated infections. Record review of Resident #2's MDS Quarterly Assessment, dated 2/04/2026 reflected the resident was an [AGE] year-old female. Initially admitted [DATE] and had a BIMs score of 12 indicating moderate cognitive impaired. The resident had diagnoses which included Heart Failure (a chronic, progressive condition where the heart cannot pump enough blood to meet the body's needs). Record review of Resident #2's Comprehensive Care Plan active 4/1/2026 revealed the resident has oxygen…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for kitchen safety.1. The facility failed to ensure food in the facility's dry storage, refrigerator, and freezer areas were labeled and dated according to guidelines.2. The facility failed to ensure that expired items in the dry storage pantry, refrigerator and freezer areas were removed.These deficient practices could affect residents who received meals and/or snacks from the main kitchen and place them at risk for cross contamination and other air-borne illnesses.Findings included:Observation of the facility's kitchen dry pantry, refrigerator, and freezer areas on 01/12/2026 at 8:50am, revealed the following food items were in unlabeled containers and dented cans with other canned food.Dry pantry area:* 2 dented 6lb. cans of [NAME] Pinto Beans.Refrigerator area:* 4 medium sized clear containers with green lids with unknown contents had no label and no use by date.* 1…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #43) reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure CNA A wore the appropriate PPE while providing incontinent care to Resident #43. This failure could place residents at risk of being infected by staff in contact with other residents with infections.Findings included: Review of Resident #43's face sheet dated 01/14/25 revealed she was an [AGE] year-old female, and she was admitted on [DATE]. Her admitting diagnoses included, repeated fall, muscle weakness, hypertension, general anxiety, and wedge compression fracture of first lumbar vertebra. Review of Resident #43's care plan initiated on 01/13/26 reflected, Resident #43 was on enhanced barrier precaution implements due…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-17 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the right to be free from misappropriation of resident rroperty for 1 (Resident #1) of 8 residents reviewed for misappropriation. The facility failed to protect Resident #1's right to be free from misappropriation of resident property when there was a drug diversion of Resident #1's approximately 23 tables of Hydrocodone pills (a controlled narcotic medication). The non-compliance was identified as past non-compliance (PNC). The non-compliance began on 05/09/25 and ended on 05/10/25. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the investigation began. This failure could place residents at risk for unrelieved pain due to their medication not being readily available. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's Face Sheet, dated 06/17/25, reflected he was a [AGE] year-old male, who admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1's diagnoses included: end stage renal disease (a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-17 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to have an established system of records of receipt and disposition of all controlled drugs in place for accurate reconciliation for 1 Hall (600 Hall) of 4 halls for 1 (Resident #1) of 8 residents with orders for controlled substances. The facility failed to determine that drug records (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) were in order and that an account of all controlled drugs were maintained and reconciled for 1 (Resident #1) of 8 residents reviewed for pharmacy services. 1.The facility failed to ensure employees with access to controlled medication properly counted the inventory of the controlled medications. 2.The facility failed to ensure that approximately 23 tablets of Hydrocodone (a controlled narcotic drug), belonging to Resident #1, was not missing from the medication cart. The medication card and narcotic log for Hydrocodone for Resident #1…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to in accordance with the accepted professional standards and practices, the facility must maintain medical records for each resident for one resident (Resident #1) of 6 residents reviewed for Medical Records. The facility failed to ensure RN A documented giving Resident #1 all of his Physician ordered medications and treatments during her assigned double shift on Sunday 04/27/25; subsequently there was no documentation for most of the care provided to Resident #1 on 04/27/25 between 6:00 am and 10:00 pm. This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk of experiencing a change in their medical condition which could cause a decline in their health and psycho-social well-being. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a [AGE] year-old male who admitted [DATE] with a Staff assessment for mental status score of 03 (Severely Impaired). He was dependent (Helper did all of the effort) for all…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-26 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving the reasonable suspicion of a crime were reported immediately to a law enforcement entity for its political subdivision, in accordance with State law, within two hours if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, for 1 (Resident #1 ) of 6 residents reviewed for abuse/neglect. The facility failed to report to the local law enforcement agency when the Administrator was notified by staff that Resident #1's family informed them Resident #1 stated he was sexually abused by a staff member on 03/23/25 and the report to law enforcement was not made until 03/25/25. This failure could place residents at risk for continued abuse due to unreported allegations of abuse. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$98,062 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $85,413 — penalty dated 2025-07-14
• $12,649 — penalty dated 2023-12-07

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CANTEX CONTINUING CARE — 37 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 72% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX