Fayetteville Health And Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

33.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 46 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 28% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 23% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 140 beds and averages 120.0 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 20 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.55 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.13 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.79 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.07 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.74 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.14 to 0.09 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

29 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2025-11-21 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure family was notified of a change in condition for one (Resident #132) of two sampled residents. The findings include: A review of Resident #132's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date of [DATE], revealed the resident had diagnoses which included Alzheimer's and Non-Alzheimer's dementia, heart disease, and type II diabetes mellitus. Resident #132's MDS also revealed a brief interview for mental status score of 06, which indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated Resident #132 was under Hospice care. A review of Resident #132's Care Plan revealed the resident was receiving services from Hospice ([DATE]). Resident #132's Hospice Care Plan records indicated Hospice and facility staff would assist family member in having an active role in care planning and the family member would be kept informed of Resident #132's care and changes in disease progression. A review of Resident #132's Progress…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure interventions of the comprehensive care plan were implemented to prevent possible skin tears to one (Resident #22) of two residents sampled. The findings include: During an observation on 09/22/2025 at 2:07 PM, this surveyor observed Resident #22 ambulating in the hallway of the [gender specific] secure neighborhood. Resident #22 was observed wearing a short sleeve top and had a partially healed skin tear to the outer aspect of their right elbow that was actively bleeding, as well as a bandage to the area below the thumb of their right hand. The resident was not wearing protective sleeves of any type at this time. During subsequent observations on 09/23/2025 at 8:56 AM and 1:43 PM, and again on 09/24/2025 at 11:50 AM, this surveyor observed Resident #22 wearing clothing that did not have long sleeves, nor was the resident wearing any type of protective sleeve. A review of Resident #22's Face Sheet indicated the facility admitted the resident on 09/18/2023 with diagnoses, which…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure one (Resident #94) of one sampled resident received an ordered medication, and to ensure a physician's order was followed for one (Resident #4) of one sampled resident. The findings include: Resident #94 A review of Resident #94's Resident Face Sheet indicated the facility admitted the resident on 12/30/2019 with diagnoses which included unspecified intellectual disabilities, depression, and generalized anxiety disorder. A review of Resident #94's quarterly minimum data set with an assessment reference date of 07/14/2025, revealed a staff assessment for mental status score of 03, which indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired and never/rarely made decisions A review of Resident #94's September Physician Orders documented, [Name Brand Contraceptive] administer 150mg intramuscularly every three months. Once a day on the 29th of every 3rd month, start date 03/31/2025. The medication was used to induce amenorrhea [the absence of monthly periods]. A review of Resident #94's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed appropriate Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) when providing care for one (Resident #14) of one sampled resident. The findings include: During an observation on 09/24/2025 at 9:50 AM, this surveyor observed an EBP sign outside Resident #14's door and the Treatment Nurse preparing to provide wound care. She put on gloves and walked into Resident #14's room, without putting on a gown. During an observation on 09/24/2025 at 9:52 AM, this surveyor observed the Treatment Nurse remove a bandage from Resident #14's right outer heel. The bandage was dated 09/22/2025 and had a yellowish drainage on it. She cleaned the resident's wound with wound cleanser and patted it dry. Resident #14 had a low bed and the Treatment Nurse was kneeled on the side of the bed. When she leaned over to provide treatment to Resident #14's wound, her shirt and pants touched the resident's bed. A review of Resident #14's Face Sheet indicated the facility admitted the resident on 03/11/2024, with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure food stored in the refrigerator, freezer, and storage room were labeled and dated and expired food items and left over foods were promptly removed from stock; and ensure employees avoided the use of alcohol-based hand rub (ABHR)/hand sanitizer gel in lieu of proper handwashing during food distribution, in 1 of 1 kitchen observed. These failed practices had the potential to affect 99 residents who received meals from the 1 of 1 kitchen. The findings are: 1. On 06/25/2024 at 11:16 AM, the following observations were made: a. Two clear plastic disposable containers of a smooth brown substance, covered with a clear lid, contained no description of contents or date. The Dietary Manager stated it was gravy and should have been labeled. The Dietary Manager removed the items from the refrigerator and placed them in trash can outside door of refrigerator. b. A clear plastic food storage container was not labeled or dated. Dietary Manger identified the contents as chocolate frosting. c. An individual container of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-06-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents rights were acknowledged and treated in a manner to promote dignity for 6 (Resident #3, #39, #46, #55, #68, and #95) of 6 sample mix residents. The findings are: 1. A review of a Face Sheet indicated the facility admitted Resident #39 with diagnoses that included hemiplegia, hemiparesis, and dementia. a. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 05/10/2024 revealed Resident #39 had a Staff Assessment for Mental Status (SAMS) score of 2, which indicated the resident was moderately impaired for their daily decision making. Skin and ulcer treatments included a pressure relieving device for chair and bed. b. Review of Resident 39's Care Plan, dated 10/23/2017, revealed the resident was at risk for skin breakdown, with interventions that included utilizing pressure reducing cushion while up in chair. c. On 06/24/2024 at 1:13 PM, (Certified Nursing Assistant) CNA #35 assisted Resident #39 into a regular chair from a specialized chair in the dining room. The dining…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-06-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure care plans were revised for 2 of 2 sampled Residents (Resident #78 and #89). The findings are: 1. A review of the Face Sheet reveals that Resident #78 had diagnoses of severe intellectual disabilities and developmental disorders. a. A review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date of 06/06/2024 showed Resident #78 had a Staff Assessment of Mental Status (SAMS) completed that reveals memory problem for long-term and short-term memory. b. A review of the Care Plan revealed an intervention of resident door open at all times for easy visualization related to inability to utilize call light. No other interventions are in place for the recent removal of the call light. c. On 06/24/2024 at 11:36 AM, Surveyor observed Resident #78 sitting on bed crossed legged with the call light going off continuously and no call light located on Resident #78 ' s side of the room or plugged into the board on the wall. d. On 06/24/2024 at 12:00 PM, during an interview Certified Nursing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-06-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a transfer lift was properly working to prevent the potential for harm for 2 (Resident #76 and Resident #79) of 2 sampled residents; and the facility failed to ensure chemicals were contained / stored when not in use to prevent the possible ingestion and injury for 1 (Resident #32) sampled resident. The findings are: 1. A review of a Face Sheet indicated the facility admitted Resident #32 with a diagnosis of dementia. a. A review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/25/2024 revealed Resident #32 had scored a 12 on a Brief Interview for Mental Status, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. b. On 06/25/2024 at 5:27 PM Resident # 32 observed lying in bed. A canister of disinfecting wipes was observed on resident nightstand. c. On 06/25/2024 at 5:30 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #19 was asked about the disinfecting wipes and revealed it was possible the resident's family brought them in, and it was a hazard and dangerous to leave those items in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure expired bubble pack medications were removed from the medication cart once the expiration date has been reached for 3 of 5 medications carts checked for review, the facility failed to ensure controlled substances were properly removed once the seal to the medication had been broke to prevent the possible misappropriation of medication for 1 of 3 medication carts checked for review, the facility failed to ensure that medications were stored and labeled out of resident reach for 1 (Resident #32) of 1 residents. The findings are: 1. On 06/27/2024 at 09:51 AM Surveyor checked E Hall Cart for compliance with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #33. The findings are: (1) bubble pack card of Ibuprofen 600 mg (milligram)tablets with an expiration date of 10/17/2023 with 13 pills remaining (1) bubble pack card of Ibuprofen 600 mg tablets with an expiration date of 10/17/2023 with 12 pills remaining (1) bubble pack card of Hyoscyamine 0.125 mg sublingual tablets with an expiration date of 05/10/2024 with 30 pills…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-27 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure meals were prepared and served according to the planned written menu to meet the nutritional needs of the residents for 2 of 2 meals observed. The failed practices had the potential to affect 7 residents who received pureed diets, 1 resident who received pureed meat only, 60 residents who received regular diets and 30 residents who received mechanical soft diets from 1 of 1 kitchen. The findings are: 1. The 06/25/2024 supper menu documented the residents who received pureed diets were to receive 3-ounce of chicken salad and 4-ounce (1/2 cup) of pureed country macaroni salad and for the residents on regular diets were to receive 3/4 cup of toss salad with dressing. 2. On 06/25/2024 at 5:26 PM, the following observations were made during the supper meal service. a. Dietary Aide #7 used a tong to serve a small portion of toss salad to the residents on regular diets. b. Dietary [NAME] (DC) #6 served mashed potatoes to the residents on pureed diets, instead of pureed country macaroni salad. At 06:05 PM, the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to NHS MANAGEMENT — 43 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 83% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AR