No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

St Augustine Health And Rehabilitation Center

51 Sunrise Blvd, Saint Augustine, FL 32084 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 120 certified beds · (904) 824-4479 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuse2 immediate-jeopardy citations$26,685 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (32% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Mar 2026
  • inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (16) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $26,685 in federal fines (most recent 2026-03-05)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1740 Tree Blvd Ste 114 · (904) 770-2333 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1750 Dobbs Rods · (949) 339-3253 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
425 State Road 207 · (904) 429-7587 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1300 Duval St · (904) 209-0395 · Typically dawn to dusk

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased8.9%8.7%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.9%5.5%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.3%0.3%0.9%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.2%0.7%2.0%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms4.7%4.6%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.8%2.5%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened8.5%9.5%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication8.2%14.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%99.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.5%4.5%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control5.6%10.5%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table4.8%8.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine94.3%94.7%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission28.5%26.1%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit15.2%9.1%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.332.131.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.841.151.80typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

42.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 71 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

42.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
56.8%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.23U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.10hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 56.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 44 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 29% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF42.5%CMS range 32.5–53.351.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.3%CMS range 8.2–15.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge56.8%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge43.2%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge45.5%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting96.8%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.5%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened5.9%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.7%CMS range 4.0–12.07.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.991.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.48
RN hours/ resident / day
0.95
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.47
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.89
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.30
RN hoursweekends
32.4%
Total nursing turnover
14.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 111.6 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.89 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.48 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.47 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.47 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.06 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.55 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 32% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

3
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-05-21)
7
at the previous standard inspection (2024-09-12)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2026-03-05 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident and staff interviews, a review of facility and resident records, and a review of the facility's policies and procedures titled Abuse, Neglect, Misappropriation of Resident/Guest Property, Suspicious Injuries of Unknown Source, Exploitation, and Turning and Positioning the Residents, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from neglect/deprivation of services by Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) A. The facility failed to ensure sufficient safeguards and supervision to protect the resident's right to be free from neglect by failing to ensure that CNA A was aware of, and implemented, care plan interventions to prevent one resident (#1) from an avoidable fall with major injury (hip fracture), from a total of four residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) assistance.On February 3, 2026, the facility neglected to ensure adequate supervision to prevent Resident #1, who required two-person assistance with bed mobility, from falling out of bed and sustaining a hip fracture due to CNA A's failure to follow the resident's care plan, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2026-03-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interviews, a review of facility and resident records, and a review of the facility's policy and procedure titled Turning and Positioning the Residents, the facility failed to ensure that residents received adequate supervision and staff assistance to prevent avoidable falls with major injury (hip fracture) for one (Resident #1) of four residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) assistance.On 2/3/2026, Resident #1, who required 2-person assistance for bed mobility, sustained a fall from bed with a subsequent right hip fracture while Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) A was providing peri-care. The CNA, working alone, turned the resident on his side in bed. The resident's leg slipped off the side of the bed pulling him to the floor. LPN B assessed the resident with no injuries immediately identified. Three staff members assisted the resident back into bed with the use of a Hoyer lift. The resident then complained of right hip pain. The physician was notified, and new orders…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on kitchen and nourishment room observations, staff interviews and a review of the facility's policies and procedures, the facility failed to follow proper sanitation and food handling practices to prevent the potential outbreak of foodborne illnesses for residents receiving food services from the facility, by failing to ensure food items were properly labeled and dated, and cleanliness of essential kitchen equipment was maintained in sanitary condition. Unsanitary food handling and storage practices have the potential to affect all residents receiving food services from the facility. The findings include:A tour of the kitchen was conducted on 5/18/2026 at 10:05 AM. During the tour, one open bag of thickener powder was observed in the dry storage room, two open boxes of frozen beef patties were observed in the freezer, and one box of pasteurized eggs was observed in the refrigerator with no labels or date markings. One expired carton of fat-free chocolate milk (dated 5/8/26), two expired cartons of whole milk (dated 5/9/26 and 5/12/26), and nine half empty cartons of whole…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-05-21 · tag F0628 — pattern
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, record reviews and a review of the facility's policies and procedures, the facility failed to provide a notice of transfer/discharge and a copy of the actual transfer/discharge form to the Long-Term Care (LTC) Ombudsman's Office for four (Residents #3, #55, #29 and #93) of nine residents reviewed for transfer/discharge. Appropriate notification to the LTC Ombudsman's office provides added protection to residents from being inappropriately transferred or discharged . It provides residents with access to an advocate who can inform them of their options and rights, and it ensures that the LTC Ombudsman's office is aware of facility practices and activities related to transfers and discharges. The findings include:1. A review of Resident #3's medical record revealed an admission date of 2/9/2026 with diagnoses including End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD). She was transferred to an acute-care hospital on 4/1/2026 and returned to the facility on 4/14/2026. The resident's medical record included no evidence of the facility having notified the LTC Ombudsman's office. There…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, interviews and review of the facility's policies and procedures, the facility failed to ensure that one (Resident #109) of four residents reviewed for impaired skin integrity, received care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice. Resident #109's wound dressing was not changed for 24 days. Failure to change a wound dressing for 24 days can result in a bacterial infection, increased pain, additional tissue damage and/or the dressing fusing to healing skin.The findings include:On 5/19/26 at 11:18 a.m., an observation was made of Resident #109 in her room on the Memory Care unit. A dressing was observed on her right lower extremity (RLE) which was dated 4/25/26. Resident #109 was unable to remember what occurred or why she had the dressing on.On 5/20/26 at 11:18 a.m., an observation was made of Resident #109 in her room. The same 4/25/26 dressing was observed on her RLE. (Photographic evidence obtained)A review of the resident's medical record revealed an admission date of 8/19/19 with diagnoses including mild protein…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-09-12 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on kitchen food service observations, staff interviews, and facility policy and procedure review, the facility failed to ensure essential kitchen equipment was in safe operating condition, by failing to maintain the inspection of the kitchen exhaust system to prevent excessive grease build-up. This could potentially endanger staff, residents and any other building occupants due to the risk for fire. The findings include: A kitchen tour was conducted on 09/11/24 at 11:05 AM. The kitchen hood located above the cook area had an inspection date that was expired. The documented date of inspection should have occurred between 5/2024 and 8/2024. (Photographic evidence obtained) In an interview with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) on 09/12/24 at 1:53 PM, she reported that the exhaust hood was inspected every three months, and the Maintenance Department was responsible for contacting the vendor. During an interview with the Director of Maintenance on 09/12/24 at 2:23 PM, he stated he did not notice that the inspection was expired. The vendor came automatically every three months…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to 1) Label drugs and biologicals in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, and 2) Ensure medications were not used past the expiration date for four (Residents #45, #3, #8, and #90) of 35 residents in the total survey sample. Failure to ensure medications are labeled appropriately and are not expired, pose a risk to resident health due to potentially reduced efficacy and contamination. The findings include: During medication administration observation on 09/10/24 at 10:40 AM, Licensed Professional Nurse (LPN) G was observed preparing a Novolog (insulin) FlexPen (a multi-dose injection pen designed to be used multiple times by the same receiver) for Resident #45. She read the label, placed a new needle on top of the FlexPen, primed the needle, set the correct ordered dose to be administered, and provided it for inspection. Reading the label revealed an opened date of 7/19/24 and an expired date of 8/16/24. When LPN G was asked to look at the expired date, she acknowledged that the FlexPen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on kitchen food service observations, staff interviews, and facility policy and procedure review, the facility failed to follow proper sanitation and food handling practices to prevent the outbreak of foodborne illness with the potential to affect all residents who consumed foods from the facility's kitchen, by failing to seal and date mark open food products in the walk-in refrigerator, and discard food products on or before the expiration date. Food handling and sanitation is important in health care settings serving nursing home residents. Unsafe food handling practices represent a potential source of pathogen exposure. The findings include: A tour of the kitchen was conducted on 09/09/24 at 10:14 AM. During the tour, no date markings were observed on one open box of tomatoes, one bin of potatoes, or one open bag of onions in the walk-in refrigerator. The dry storage room had one open bag of wrapped potato chips with no date marking and nine thickened lemon-flavored water containers with expiration dates of 09/02/24. On 09/09/24 at 11:36 AM, the Certified Dietary Manager…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to provide its residents with a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, directly affecting residents in five (Rooms 118, 121, 124, 126, and 132) of 66 resident rooms. Failure to maintain a safe, clean comfortable environment could result in accidents, the spread of infection, and a negative impact to residents' psychosocial well-being. The findings include: During an initial tour of the facility on 9/9/2024 from 9:30 AM through 12:00 PM, the following environmental concerns in resident areas were observed: Heavily stained privacy curtains and window curtains, holes in window curtains, uncomfortable temperatures, and bug carcasses in the following resident rooms: Rooms 121, 118, 124, 126, and 132. (Photographic evidence obtained for all) During an interview on 9/9/2024 at 11:36 AM with Resident #9, she stated the air conditioning (AC) in her room had been broken for about a month. She further stated she and her roommate had both notified staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-12 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that two residents (#29 and #55) with limited range of motion (ROM) received appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion and/or to prevent further decrease in range of motion. There were three residents reviewed for limited range of motion in a total survey sample of 35 residents. The findings include: 1. During the initial tour on 09/09/24 at 10:00 AM, Resident #29 was observed in her room seated in her wheelchair. She had left-sided weakness. Her left foot was dorsiflexed (upward bending and contracting) and crossed over her right foot. When she was asked if she had any concerns, she used a communication board with alphabet letters on her bedside table and spelled out, It she would like the mess cleaned up. She pointed across the room next to her TV. A splint was located under a heap of belongings there. When asked if she used the splint, she shook her head no. (Photographic evidence obtained) She was asked…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-12 · tag F0813 — isolated
    Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors to ensure safe and sanitary storage, handling, and consumption. This failure directly impacted residents in four (Rooms 108, 120, 121, and 126) of 66 resident rooms with the potential to impact every resident with a personal refrigerator. The findings include: During an initial tour of the facility on 9/9/2024 from 9:30 AM through 12:00 PM, resident areas/rooms were observed: Multiple residents had personal refrigerators in their rooms. There were no temperature logs and expired food was located in the following rooms: Rooms 108, 120, 121, and 126. (Photographic evidence obtained for all) On 9/10/2024 at 11:57 AM, a personal refrigerator was observed in a room occupied by Residents #3 and #59. Both residents were non-verbal. Upon opening the refrigerator, a live roach was observed crawling on the bottom shelf. An interview was conducted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record reviews, and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to help prevent the transmission of communicable diseases and infections, by failing to perform appropriate hand hygiene during medication administration for two (Residents #13 and #33) of eight residents observed for medication administration from a total survey sample of 35 residents. The findings include: During another observation of medication administration on 9/11/24 at 1:10 PM, LPN H was observed preparing medication for Resident #13 at the nurses' station. LPN H reviewed the physician's orders and obtained two tablets of Buspirone 10 mg (milligrams), Clonazepam 0.5 mg, and Oxycodone-Acetaminophen 10-325 mg. She did not perform hand hygiene before popping medications into a medication cup. She then handed the medication cup with the medication to Resident #13 who was seated on his Rollator walker at the nurses' station. After the resident took the medication, LPN H discarded the cup in the trash but did not perform hand hygiene.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-13 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and an interview with the Business Office Manager, the facility failed to ensure each resident was informed before, or at the time of admission, and periodically during the resident's stay, of services available in the facility and of charges for those services, including any charges for services not covered under Medicare/Medicaid or by the facility's per diem rate for two (Resident #42 and Resident #22) of three residents sampled for review of Beneficiary Protection Notifications, from a total sample of 40 residents. The findings include: A review of Resident #42's medical record revealed an admission date of 5/26/2022. His last covered day for Medicare Part A services was 7/19/2022. The resident was discharged from Medicare A and remained in the facility. A review of Resident #22's medical record revealed an admission dated of 7/25/2022. Her last covered day of Medicare Part A services was 8/17/2022. The resident was discharged from Medicare A and remained in the facility. A record review of Beneficiary Protection Notifications for three randomly selected…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-13 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure assessments accurately reflected residents' status for two (Resident #82 and Resident #93) of 40 residents sampled. Failure to accurately assess residents' care needs and medical status could result in a failure to provide needed care and services, resulting in complications and/or functional decline. The findings include: On 10/10/2022 at 2:45 p.m., Resident #82 was observed in his room lying in bed under the covers. He was greeted and he responded with garbled speech. At this time it was determined that the resident was not interviewable. Upon leaving Resident #82's room, Resident #93 was observed being escorted back to her room on a shower bed by two staff members. She was greeted and asked if she would agree to an interview once she returned to her room and got settled. She responded with grunts and giggles, reaching her hand out to make contact, and continuing to grunt, giggle, and motion for the surveyor's hand. At this time it was determined that the resident was not interviewable. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-13 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident was screened for a mental disorder (MD) or intellectual disability (ID) prior to admission, and that individuals identified with MD or ID were evaluated and received care and services in the most integrated setting appropriate to their needs for one (Resident #67) of 40 sampled residents. The findings include: A review of Resident #67's medical record on 10/10/22 at 2:36 p.m. and on 10/11/22 at 2:00 p.m. revealed no Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review Process (PASARR) present. On 10/11/22 at 2:50 p.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) stated, I could not find the PASARR. We are going to do a new one now. A record review was conducted for Resident #67 noting an admission date of 8/18/22. His diagnoses included pathological fracture, humerus, subs for fixture for routine heal; malignant neoplasm of unspecific part of unspecific bronchus or lung; type II diabetes mellitus, heart disease, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, and anxiety disorder. Resident #67 had physician's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews, and facility record review, the facility failed to follow proper sanitation and food handling practices to prevent the outbreak of foodborne illness with the potential to affect all residents who consumed foods from the facility's kitchen. The facility failed to ensure that the dietary staff was trained and knowledgeable about the proper procedures for food storage and proper sanitation practices in the kitchen. Specific instruction on food handling and sanitation is important in health care settings serving nursing home residents. Unsafe food handling practices represent a potential source of pathogen exposure. The findings include: An initial tour of the kitchen was conducted with Dietary Manager (DM) G on 10/10/2022 at 10:25 a.m. During the tour, the bread cart in the dry storage pantry had three open bundles of bread that were not dated/labeled. The fryer was covered with grease buildup and food debris. The floor underneath the fryer had soiled grease and a buildup of food debris covering the drainage area. During an interview at the time…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$26,685 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $26,685 — penalty dated 2026-03-05

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to NHS MANAGEMENT — 43 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.9-1.9 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.7-1.7 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 53.7+0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 53.5-0.5 vs chain
The other 42 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
1 of 5Aspire Physical Recovery Center At Cahaba RiverVestavia, AL 1 of 5Aspire Physical Recovery Center At Hoover, LLCHoover, AL 1 of 5Cordova Health And Rehabilitation, LLCCordova, AL 1 of 5Glen Haven Health And Rehabilitation, LLCNorthport, AL 1 of 5Huntsville Health & Rehabilitation, LLCHuntsville, AL 1 of 5Legacy Health And Rehabilitation Of Pleasant GrovePleasant Grove, AL 1 of 5Prattville Health And Rehabilitation, LLCPrattville, AL 1 of 5Wetumpka Health And Rehabilitation, LLCWetumpka, AL 2 of 5Civic Center Health And Rehabilitation, LLCBirmingham, AL 2 of 5Gulf Coast Health And Rehabilitation, LLCMobile, AL 2 of 5Legacy Health And Rehabilitation CenterFort Smith, AR 2 of 5South Health And Rehabilitation, LLCBirmingham, AL 2 of 5Springdale Health And Rehabilitation CenterSpringdale, AR 2 of 5Tallassee Health And Rehabilitation, LLCTallassee, AL 2 of 5West Melbourne Health & Rehabilitation CenterWest Melbourne, FL 3 of 5Ashland Place Health And Rehabilitation, LLCMobile, AL 3 of 5Fayetteville Health And Rehabilitation CenterFayetteville, AR 3 of 5Florala Health And Rehabilitation LLCFlorala, AL 3 of 5Hunter Creek Health And Rehabilitation, LLCNorthport, AL 3 of 5Jacksonville Health And Rehabilitation, LLCJacksonville, AL 3 of 5Northway Health And Rehabilitation, LLCBirmingham, AL 3 of 5Oak Knoll Health And Rehabilitation, LLCBirmingham, AL 3 of 5Opp Health And Rehabilitation, LLCOpp, AL 3 of 5Ozark Health And Rehabilitation, LLCOzark, AL 3 of 5Park Manor Health And Rehabilitation, LLCNorthport, AL 3 of 5South Haven Health And Rehabilitation, LLCBirmingham, AL 3 of 5Sumter Health And Rehabilitation, L L CYork, AL 4 of 5Aspire Physical Recovery Center Of West AlabamaNorthport, AL 4 of 5Columbiana Health And Rehabilitation, LLCColumbiana, AL 4 of 5Covington Court Health And Rehabilitation CenterFort Smith, AR 4 of 5Crystal River Health And Rehabilitation CenterCrystal River, FL 4 of 5Georgiana Health And Rehabilitation, LLCGeorgiana, AL 4 of 5Luverne Health And Rehabilitation, LLCLuverne, AL 4 of 5Moundville Health And Rehabilitation, LLCMoundville, AL 4 of 5Ocala Health And Rehabilitation CenterOcala, FL 4 of 5Paris Health And Rehabilitation CenterParis, AR 4 of 5Valley View Health And Rehabilitation, LLCMadison, AL 5 of 5Athens Health And Rehabilitation LLCAthens, AL 5 of 5Crossville Health And Rehabilitation, LLCCrossville, AL 5 of 5Daytona Beach Health And Rehabilitation CenterDaytona Beach, FL

Showing 40 of 42; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
JAMES N ESTES JR FAMILY DYNASTY TR NO 2Organization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST10%since 09/30/2019
JAMES NORMAN ESTES JR TROrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST6%since 06/30/2013
JENNIFER E AGEE FAMILY DYNASTY TR NO 2Organization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST10%since 09/30/2019
JENNIFER LEE ESTES TR 031093Organization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST6%since 06/30/2013
ESTES, JAMESIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER68%since 02/19/1999
REGIONS BANKOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTERESTsince 08/27/2013
HUGHES, THOMASIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 09/17/2021
MCVEA, CHERIIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 09/27/2021
RASCO, LYNNIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/01/2022
SCHNEIDER, JULIEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/21/2023
TONEY, DARINIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/15/2024
LONG, PHILLIPIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 10/01/2019

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$11.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-14.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.4M
Related-party expense10% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 73%Medicare 7%Other / private 20%

About 73% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 10% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$331per resident / day
operating cost
$10,065per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$290per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Florida Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Florida
$10,342/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,610/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 105315. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-21, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next