No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

West Melbourne Health & Rehabilitation Center

2125 West New Haven Ave, West Melbourne, FL 32904 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 180 certified beds · (321) 725-7360 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (321) 725-7360 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Resident-funds citations (F0565, F0568)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565, F0568)
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (37) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1747 Evans Rd · (321) 951-9222 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1800 W Hibiscus Blvd Ste 101 · (321) 726-1600 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Publix0.3 mi
2261 W New Haven Ave · (321) 676-0115 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
2350 W New Haven Ave · (321) 733-1030

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased8.3%8.7%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight1.6%5.5%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.3%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.4%0.7%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%4.6%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.6%2.5%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened4.9%9.5%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication5.7%14.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%99.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.1%4.5%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control7.7%10.5%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table3.4%8.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine74.4%94.7%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission22.4%26.1%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit7.6%9.1%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.472.131.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.941.151.80typical

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

43.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 49 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

43.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
45.3%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.26U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.11hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 45.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 53 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 37% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF43.9%CMS range 33.5–54.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.5%CMS range 5.9–13.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge45.3%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge52.8%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge20.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified96.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting46.1%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.2%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.5%CMS range 3.6–12.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.081.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.58
RN hours/ resident / day
0.87
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.28
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.73
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.39
RN hoursweekends
47.4%
Total nursing turnover
40.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 180 beds and averages 152.3 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 28 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.73 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.58 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.28 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.12 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.98 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.66 to 0.39 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 47% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

12
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-12-04)
10
at the previous standard inspection (2023-12-14)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

37 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 27 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-04 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to respond in writing to repeated grievances identified by resident council over a six-month period, (June to November 2025).Findings: During Resident Council meeting on 12/02/25 at 10:34 AM, members of Resident Council verified they met monthly. The members stated several grievances had been voiced regarding nurse and aide staffing, staff customer service and dietary issues. The residents in attendance agreed the same concerns were voiced month after month without a resolution from the facility. The group expressed no one ever responded to the grievances and informed them of what was done. Review of the grievance log from June through November of 2025 revealed one grievance from the Resident Council dated 11/12/25, in regard to their concerns with staff being loud, rude, and on their cell phones in the dining room. Further review of Resident Council minutes from June through November 2025 revealed the staff customer service concerns about staff on their cell phones was repeated several times. There were also repeat…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain the overall cleanliness of the kitchen and ensure that food was stored and distributed in a sanitary manner.Findings:On 12/01/25 at 10:10 AM, the initial kitchen tour inspection was conducted with the Kitchen Manager. She stated she had been in the position for two years but had been a Certified Nursing Assistant prior to her current position. Initial observation found the floor unclean, as evidenced by stuck on food under the tables and equipment. The Kitchen Manager said the floors were cleaned every night prior to closing the kitchen but once per month the Maintenance Department power washed the floors. She was unsure when maintenance had last done the floors. The shelves directly below the steam table had a sticky residue and stuck on food. Next to the dishwashing sink there was a table used for meal prep that had a top shelf where spices were stored. The spice bottle lids were visibly dirty, sticky, and unable to close due to crusted spice flakes and residue on them. There was a half empty clear…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-04 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Quality Assessment & Assurance (QAA) / Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee conducted performance improvement activities to ensure prior improvement measures were sustained. Findings: Review of the facility's QAPI Plan revealed the facility would gather information from various sources including past surveys to identify and clarify issues or problems, design and implement interventions, assess results and sustain improvements using a root cause process. During the previous recertification survey conducted 12/11/23 to 12/14/23, the facility had deficiencies cited at F677 for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care not provided to a dependent resident related to nail care, F695 for tracheostomy care and oxygen therapy not provided as ordered, and at F812 for storage/preparation/service of food in a sanitary manner. During this survey, the facility was found to again be in noncompliance with F677 for ADL care not provided to a dependent resident related to oral care and showers, F695 for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to promote dignity during dining for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for dignity, of a total sample of 49 residents, (#20).Findings: Review of resident #20's medical record revealed he was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted from an acute care hospital on [DATE] with diagnoses including quadriplegia (spinal cord injury affecting all four limbs), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and type 2 diabetes. Review of resident #20's Minimum Data Set (MDS) annual assessment with an Assessment Reference Date of 9/02/25 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15 out of 15, indicating intact cognition. The MDS assessment identified impairment of both upper and lower extremities. The assessment revealed resident #20 was totally dependent on staff for all activities of daily living (ADLs) except toileting hygiene, for which he required substantial assistance, and was dependent on staff for mobility. Review of resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0568 — isolated
    Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow generally accepted accounting principles in the management of resident personal funds for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for personal funds, of a total sample of 49 residents, (#13).Findings: Review of resident #13's medical record revealed she was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included Parkinsonism, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and neuropathy. Review of the Minimum Data Set quarterly assessment with an Assessment Reference Date of 9/29/25 revealed resident #13 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 out of 15 indicating mild cognitive impairment. A BIMS score of 12/15 indicates the individual has a relatively good level of cognitive function, (retrieved on 12/17/25 from www.clevelandclinic.org). On 12/02/25 at 9:17 AM, resident #13 stated she had not received bank statements or the facility's financial statements. She shared the facility managed her finances and she would like to receive monthly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to refund to the resident or resident representative any and all refunds due the resident within 30 days from the resident's date of discharge from the facility, for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for discharge, of a total sample of 49 residents, (#151). Findings: Resident #151 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's Disease, intervertebral disc degeneration of lumbar region, major depressive disorder, and essential primary hypertension. Review of the Minimum Data Set quarterly assessment with assessment reference date of 5/08/25 revealed resident #151 had Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 5 out of 15 which indicated severe cognitive impairment. Review of resident #151's medical record revealed her daughter, Jeannelle [NAME], was resident #151's guardian, emergency contact, responsible party for decision making, durable power of attorney (POA) - financial and received the financial statements. Review of resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide maintenance and housekeeping services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior in 2 of 2 shower rooms, on 1 of 3 units, (B-Wing).Findings: On 12/02/25 at 10:03 AM, resident #33 shared there was a black substance above the door in one of the B wing shower rooms. On 12/04/25 at 1:28 PM, the Housekeeping Director stated he was responsible for managing housekeeping and laundry services. He shared he performed monthly audits of residents' rooms to ensure conditions were in good order. An observation of the east individual shower room in the B-wing was conducted with the Housekeeping Director at 1:48 PM. A black substance was observed on the ceiling near the air conditioner vent and on the vent itself (photographic evidence obtained). The Housekeeping Director stated the black substance resulted from condensation from the air conditioner vent. He indicated housekeeping staff were responsible for cleaning the exterior of the vent, while maintenance staff were responsible for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the grievance process by not making a prompt effort to resolve a grievance and not keeping the resident apprised of the progress toward resolution for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for personal property, of a total sample of 49 residents, (#20).Findings: Review of resident #20's medical record revealed he was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted from an acute care hospital on [DATE] with diagnoses including quadriplegia (paralysis of all four limbs), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and type 2 diabetes. Review of resident #20's Minimum Data Set (MDS) annual assessment with an Assessment Reference Date of 9/02/25 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15 out of 15, indicating intact cognition. The MDS assessment noted it was very important to resident #20 to take care of his personal belongings. On 12/01/25 at 4:33 PM, resident #20 stated approximately three months earlier, while being moved from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for a resident with antipsychotic medications for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for high-risk medications, of a total of 49 residents, (#116); the facility failed to develop an individualized care plan to include paranoid schizophrenia for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR), (#103),of a total sample of 49 residents.Findings: 1.Review of resident #116's medical record revealed she was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of hypertensive heart disease without heart failure, Alzheimer's disease, dementia with psychotic disturbances, major depressive disease and anxiety. Review of resident #116's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with Assessment Reference Date (ARD)of 11/16/25 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3 out of 15, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. The assessment showed resident #116 received…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received proper and timely assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) to maintain cleanliness and dignity for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for ADLs, of a total sample of 49 residents, (#20 and #143).Findings: 1.Review of resident #20's medical record revealed he was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted from an acute care hospital on [DATE] with diagnoses including quadriplegia (paralysis of all four limbs), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and type 2 diabetes. Review of resident #20's Minimum Data Set (MDS) annual assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 9/02/25 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, indicating intact cognition. The MDS assessment indicated no rejection of evaluation or care necessary to achieve goals for health and well-being. The MDS assessment showed resident #20 had impairment of both upper and lower extremities and was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 27 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement the recommended Restorative Nurse Program (RNP) to provide mobility and Range of Motion (ROM) services to improve or maintain functional ability for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for rehabilitation and restorative services, out of a total sample of 49 residents, (#13).Findings: Review of resident #13's medical record revealed she was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included Parkinsonism, insomnia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, neuropathy, and schizoaffective disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set quarterly assessment with Assessment Reference Date of 9/29/25 revealed resident #13 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 12 out of 15, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS assessment noted no rejection of evaluation or care necessary to achieve goals for health and well-being. The MDS assessment showed resident #13 required partial assistance with oral hygiene, substantial assistance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain physician orders for respiratory treatments for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for respiratory care, of a total sample of 49 residents, (#33).Findings: Review of the medical record revealed resident #33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (low levels of oxygen), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), type 2 diabetes, and Cor pulmonale (enlargement of the right ventricle of the heart due to lung diseases). Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) admission assessment with an Assessment Reference Date of 11/13/25 revealed resident #33 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 14 out of 15, indicating intact cognition. The MDS assessment indicated the resident did not exhibit behavioral symptoms or reject evaluation or care that was necessary to achieve her goals for health and well-being. The MDS assessment revealed resident #33 experienced shortness…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who experienced trauma received trauma-informed care for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for mood/behavior, of a total sample of 49 residents, (#9). Findings:Resident #9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of type 2 diabetes and obstructive sleep apnea. The facility added the diagnoses generalized anxiety disorder on 2/27/25, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) on 3/13/25, and major depressive disorder on 3/26/25.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Annual Assessment with Assessment Reference Date of 11/05/25 revealed resident #9 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15/15 which indicated she was cognitively intact. The MDS listed PTSD as one of her diagnoses, on 3/13/25.The electronic medical record (EMR) contained a Trauma-Informed Care Observation dated 2/09/25 which revealed resident #9 had personally experienced a natural disaster, witnessed an assault with a weapon, and was a victim of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-06 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure complete medical records were readily accessible, and not restricted to access for 16 of 16 total sampled residents, (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #16, #17, #18, #19, #20, #21, #22, #23, #24, #25); and failed to ensure hard copy medical records were safeguarded for all residents. Findings: On 2/05/24 at 9:40 AM, an entrance conference was held with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and Director of Nursing (DON). The survey team requested items that included access to all residents' complete medical records. On 2/05/24 at 1:20 PM, surveyors were unable to view any sampled residents' Comprehensive Care Plans in the Electronic Health Record (EHR). On 2/05/24 at 3:58 PM, the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Coordinator said she had to obtain records from multiple sources to complete assessments and she didn't have direct access to all the EHRs. She explained the Social Services Director kept residents' behavioral health progress notes in her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-06 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to complete dietary assessment within recommended timeframes for 2 of 2 residents and failed to obtain preferences and allergies pertaining to lactose intolerance for 1 resident of a total sample of 16 residents, (#20, #24). Findings: 1. Resident #20, a [AGE] year-old female was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included pulmonary embolism, hypertension, and gastroesophageal reflux disease. Review of the resident's physician orders revealed an entry dated 12/14/23 which indicated the resident was on a regular diet, and Lactose intolerant. No milk. No cheese. On 2/06/24 at 11:55 AM, the Dietary Manager explained that within seventy-two (72) hours of admission, the resident was seen by the Dietary Manager, and an admission Dietary Assessment was completed. The resident's food allergies, and preferences were obtained, and populated to the resident's meal ticket. The Dietary Manager stated she did not complete an admission Assessment/Dietary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-14 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide written Notification of Transfer or Discharge forms to the residents or their representative for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for hospitalization, out of a total sample of 52 residents, (#5). Findings: Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of acute respiratory failure, acute pulmonary edema, hypertensive heart disease, acute congestive heart failure and cardiomyopathy. Review of resident #5's medical record revealed she was transferred to the hospital on [DATE]. A progress note dated 12/07/23 read, Resident with seizure activity. Physician notified and order obtained to send to emergency department. The medical record did not contain a Notification of Transfer or Discharge form for the hospitalization. On 12/13/23 at 5:04 PM, the Social Services Director (SSD) stated she did not know who completed the Notification of Transfer or Discharge forms. She explained she sent a monthly log to the Ombudsman for residents who were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dishes were washed at the appropriate temperature, with regard to the dish machine's data plate and manufacturer's instructions. Findings: On 12/11/23 at 11:06 AM, during kitchen observation, the Dietary Manager started the dish machine and put a couple of empty dish racks through the machine. The temperature dial on the dish machine showed temperature to be 156 degrees Fahrenheit (F). The Data Plate, on the machine, noted the wash temperature should be 160 degrees F. The dish machine temperature log dated 12/11/23 noted the morning wash temperature was 155 degrees F. The Dietary Manager identified the initials next to the recorded temperature as Dietary Aide L. On 12/11/23 at approximately 11:15 AM, Dietary Aide L verified he recorded the temperatures that morning. He stated he had continued to wash dishes. Dietary Aide L explained that was the first temperature and the water got hotter as he ran the machine but acknowledged he did not record any of those temperatures. Dietary Aide L stated he did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain proper infection control practices to prevent contamination during tracheostomy care for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for respiratory care, (#40) and failed to ensure the appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) was donned prior to entry to transmission-based precaution rooms to prevent the potential for cross contamination for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for transmission-based precautions, (#109, #199) of a total sample of 52 residents. Findings: 1. Resident #40 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted from acute care hospital on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure, dependence on supplemental oxygen, attention to tracheostomy, anoxic brain damage, cerebral infarction, and seizures. A tracheostomy (also called a tracheotomy) is an opening surgically created through the neck into the trachea (windpipe) to allow air to fill the lungs. After creating the tracheostomy opening in the neck,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-14 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for pain management of a total sample of 52 residents, (#199). Findings: Resident #199 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included encephalopathy, stage IV pressure ulcer, Klebsiella pneumonia, and resistance to multiple antibiotics. Review of the resident's physician orders revealed entries dated 12/08/23, 12/09/23, and on 12/12/23 for pain management/ medications. Review of the resident's clinical record revealed care plan potential for pain with start date of 12/11/23. A baseline care plan developed within 48 hours of the resident's admission could not be identified. On 12/14/23 at 4:10 PM, the Regional Case Manager stated baseline care plans were developed within 48 hours of admission and were revised when the comprehensive care plan was developed. On 12/14/23 at 4:30 PM, the Registered Nurse/ Minimum Data Set Coordinator (RN/MDS) stated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-14 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were involved in developing the comprehensive person-centered plan of care for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for participation in care plan, of a total sample of 52 residents, (#52). Findings Resident #52, a [AGE] year-old female was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included chronic systolic (congestive) heart failure, diabetes type II, mild intermittent asthma, other chronic pain, and shortness of breath. Review of the resident's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with Assessment Reference Date of 9/20/23 revealed the resident's cognition was intact, with a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15 out of 15. On 12/11/23 at 4:04 PM, resident #52 stated she did not get invited to her care plan meetings. On 12/13/23 at 10:42 AM, the Registered Nurse/ Unit Manager (RN/UM) for the 200 Hall stated resident/family were invited to their care plan meeting by the Social Service Director (SSD),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide fingernail care for a dependent resident, for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care of a total sample of 52 residents, (#7). Finding: Clinical record review revealed resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included major depressive disorder, chronic kidney disease, pain, sarcoma, and psychotic disorder with hallucinations. Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with Assessment Reference Date of 10/11/23 revealed the resident's cognition was severely impaired, and the resident was dependent on staff assistance for toileting, shower/bathe, and personal hygiene. On 12/11/23 at 10:29 AM, 12/12/23 at 9:40 AM, resident #7 was lying in bed on her back with her eyes closed. She did not respond when spoken to. The resident's fingernails to both hands were untrimmed, with a dark substance under the fingernails of her left hand. On 12/13/23 at 9:00 AM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure nurses followed physician's Leave of Absence (LOA) orders and failed to provide necessary monitoring and supervision to mitigate the risk of serious injury for 1 of 7 residents reviewed for Accidents, of a total sample of 52 residents, (#77). Finding: Review of the medical record revealed resident #77 was admitted to the facility from an acute care hospital on 5/29/23 with diagnoses that included substance use disorder, ETOH (alcohol) and opiate (narcotic pain medication) dependence with recent recurrent episode, history of falls, impaired gait, neuropathy (nerve impairment/damage), chronic pain, and shortness of breath. On 12/03/23, the resident was transferred to an acute care hospital and readmitted from an inpatient psychiatric facility on 12/06/23 with diagnoses that included alcohol use disorder, severe, and major depressive disorder, with severe recurrent episode. The MDS Quarterly Assessment with ARD 11/28/23 noted the resident scored 13 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-14 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Midline dressing was changed in accordance with professional standards to prevent the potential for infection for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for antibiotic use of a total sample of 52 residents, (#198). Findings: Resident #198 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included peripheral autonomic neuropathy, spinal stenosis, lumbar region, urinary tract infection, multiple myeloma, and bacteremia. The resident's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with Assessment Reference Date of 12/08/23 indicated the resident's cognition was moderately impaired with a Brief Interview For Mental Status score of 12/15. The assessment revealed the resident received intravenous medications on admission. Review of the resident's physician orders showed an order dated 12/07/23 with start date of 12/12/23 for Midline dressing change every 7 days. An order dated 12/09/23 noted antibiotic, Ceftriaxone 2 grams every day at 8 PM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-14 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services consistent with professional standards of practice pertaining to tracheostomy care and suctioning for 1 of 4 residents (#40), and failed to ensure Oxygen (O2) therapy was administered per physician's order for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for O2 therapy, (#52) of a total sample of 52 residents. Findings: 1. Resident #40 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted from an acute care hospital on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure, dependence on supplemental oxygen, attention to tracheostomy, anoxic brain damage, cerebral infarction, and seizures. A tracheostomy (also called a tracheotomy) is an opening surgically created through the neck into the trachea (windpipe) to allow air to fill the lungs. After creating the tracheostomy opening in the neck, surgeons insert a tube through it to provide an airway and to remove secretions from the lungs (retrieved on 12/21/23 from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-14 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff were competent to care for residents with tracheostomy for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for respiratory care of a total of 52 residents, (#40). Findings: Resident #40 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted from acute care hospital on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure, dependence on supplemental oxygen, attention to tracheostomy, anoxic brain damage, cerebral infarction, and seizures. A tracheostomy (also called a tracheotomy) is an opening surgically created through the neck into the trachea (windpipe) to allow air to fill the lungs. After creating the tracheostomy opening in the neck, surgeons insert a tube through it to provide an airway and to remove secretions from the lungs (retrieved on 12/21/23 from www.hopkinsmedicine.org). The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] showed resident #40 required oxygen therapy, suctioning and tracheostomy care. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-03-16 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the garbage storage area was maintained in clean and sanitary condition. Finding: During the initial kitchen inspection on 3/13/22, the garbage storage area was observed at 11:10 AM. There was a trash compactor and dumpster for recycling with one of the doors open. Debris was scattered on the ground including white/clear gloves, milk cartons and other refuse. [NAME] Z was in the area and said the dumpster doors should be closed at all times. He said the gloves were used by nursing staff as the kitchen staff used black gloves. He explained he did not know who was responsible for keeping the garbage storage area clean. On 3/16/22 the Certified Dietary Manager indicated he did daily inspections which included the garbage storage area. He explained he did not work on 3/13/22 and did not know who was responsible for inspecting the garbage storage area when he was off work.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-03-16 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record, the facility failed to ensure the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program developed and implemented timely and appropriate plans of action to prevent repeat deficient practices related to physical environment and Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments. Findings: Cross Reference F584, F636, F638 and F640 Review of the facility's survey history revealed repeat deficiencies and systemic concerns with the resident's physical environment over the past four years, and for the current recertification survey. Past deficiencies noted failures in maintaining comfortable resident rooms, resident equipment and furniture. Review of the facility's survey history also revealed repeat deficiency related to resident MDS assessments over the past year and systemic concerns for the current recertification survey with inaccurate assessments, delays in completing and transmitting MDS assessments. On 3/16/22 at 4:52 PM, an interview was conducted with the Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON) regarding the facility's QAPI program. Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-03-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a clean, comfortable and homelike environment in 7 resident rooms, (A-109, A-110, A-120, B-202, B-223, C-309, C-324), on 3 of 3 units, (A, B and C Wings). Findings: 1. On 3/14/22 at 10:32 AM, the bottom portion of the walls near the closets in rooms 110 and room [ROOM NUMBER] were noted to be damaged. The walls were gashed and dented and sheet rock was exposed. 2. On 3/13/22 at 12:44 PM, the air conditioning (AC) unit in room [ROOM NUMBER] was noted to have a large amount of thick dust inside the vents and along the length of the filter. There was a saturated, soiled white blanket on the floor that extended from under the AC unit towards the nearby bed. Photographic evidence was obtained. On 3/14/22 at 8:28 AM, the dirty, wet blanket remained on the floor under the AC unit, and the vents and filter were still coated with gray dust. On 3/15/22 at 11:02 AM, the blanket on the floor had been removed but the condition of the AC vents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-03-16 · tag F0636 — pattern
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Annual and Significant Change in Status Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were completed within 14 days of the assessment reference date (ARD) for 5 of 16 residents reviewed for Resident Assessment, of a total sample of 56 residents, ( #1, #2, #4, #7 & #12). Findings: 1. Review of resident #1's Annual MDS assessment with ARD of 1/25/22 revealed Section Z0500 was signed by the Registered Nurse (RN) Assessment Coordinator on 3/09/22 to indicate completion of the assessment, 43 days after the ARD. 2. Review of resident #2's Annual MDS assessment with ARD of 1/24/22 revealed Section Z0500 was signed by the RN Assessment Coordinator on 2/25/22, 32 days after the ARD. 3. Review of resident #4's Significant Change in Status MDS assessment with ARD of 1/26/22 revealed Section Z0500 was signed by the RN Assessment Coordinator on 3/02/22, 35 days after the ARD. 4. Review of resident #7's Annual MDS assessment with ARD of 1/30/22 revealed Section Z0500 was signed by the RN Assessment Coordinator on 3/10/22, 39 days after the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-03-16 · tag F0638 — pattern
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were completed within 14 days of the assessment reference date (ARD) for 7 of 16 residents reviewed for Resident Assessment, of a total sample of 56 residents, ( #3, #6, #10, #11, #14, #16 & #40). Findings: 1. Review of resident #16's Quarterly MDS assessment with ARD of 2/02/22 revealed Section Z0500 was signed by the Registered Nurse (RN) Assessment Coordinator on 2/24/22 to indicate completion of the assessment, 22 days after the ARD. 2. Review of resident #3's Quarterly MDS assessment with ARD of 1/24/22 revealed Section Z0500 was signed by the RN Assessment Coordinator on 2/24/22, 31 days after the ARD. 3. Review of resident #10's Quarterly MDS assessment with ARD of 1/25/22 reveled Section Z0500 was signed by the RN Assessment Coordinator on 2/25/22, 31 days after the ARD. 4. Review of resident #11's Quarterly MDS assessment with ARD of 2/14/22 revealed Section Z0500 was signed by the RN…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-03-16 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow and serve therapeutic diets as per facility's menu and for 2 of 11 residents observed for dining/nutritional concerns, (#128 and #636). Findings: 1. Review of the facility's Diet Census revealed 13 residents had physician orders for pureed diets. Review of the facility's Cycle Menu for week #4 revealed meat lasagna was served for lunch on Sunday, 3/13/22. The other menu items for that meal included vegetable blend, garlic bread and frosted cake. The alternate meal for lunch on 3/13/22 included chicken tenders and french fries. Review of the facility's therapeutic menu revealed residents with physician ordered pureed diets were to receive 6 ounces of pureed meat lasagna and/or pureed chicken tenders. On Sunday, 3/13/22 at 10:35 AM, during the initial kitchen inspection at 10:50 AM, the lunch tray line was in progress. On the steam table were meat lasagna, vegetable blend, chicken tenders, puréed chicken tenders, pureed vegetable…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-16 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident dignity during incontinence care for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for dignity of a total sample of 56 residents, (#107). Findings Review of resident #107's medical record documented he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of stroke and Arteriosclerotic Heart Disease. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] showed he was cognitively intact, required extensive assistance with all Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), had impairment on one side of upper and lower extremity and was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. Review of the resident's plan of care revealed the resident was unable to perform self care, required total assistance with ADLs with intervention to provide privacy. On 03/13/22 at 2:27 PM, resident #107 stated he was incontinent and wore a brief. He said the staff had to provide incontinence care and help him to wash up. He explained the staff closed the room door…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-16 · tag F0640 — isolated
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were transmitted to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) within 14 days of completion, for 1 of 16 residents reviewed for Resident Assessment, of a total sample of 56 residents, (#6). Findings: Review of resident #6's Quarterly MDS assessment with ARD of 1/17/22 revealed Section Z0500 was signed by the Registered Nurse (RN) Assessment Coordinator on 2/22/22 to indicate completion of the assessment. The document was transmitted to CMS on 3/09/22, 15 days after completion. On 3/16/22 at 3:56 PM, during review of MDS Assessment Detail forms, the Regional MDS Manager confirmed the Quarterly MDS assessment for resident #6 was not transmitted to CMS within 14 days of completion as required. On 3/16/22 at 5:27 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) explained the facility's Lead MDS Coordinator resigned in December 2021 and the department was short-staffed until another Lead MDS Coordinator was hired three weeks ago. The DON stated she was not aware of how far behind schedule…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-16 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to incorporate expressed choices for preferred activities into the plan of care, and failed to ensure access to a television provided by family to promote the highest practicable well-being for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for activities, of a total sample of 56 residents, (#8). Findings: Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including gastrostomy tube, tracheostomy, stroke, seizures, brain damage due to lack of oxygen, respiratory failure, dependence on supplemental oxygen. A tracheostomy is a hole that is created surgically through the front of the neck and into the windpipe. A tube is inserted into the hole to keep it open for breathing and to maintain a permanent or temporary airway as indicated. A gastrostomy tube is inserted directly into the stomach through a surgically created opening in the abdominal wall. It is used to provide nutrition and hydration for patients who cannot swallow normally (retrieved on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen was administered as ordered by the physician for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for respiratory care, of a total sample of 56 residents, (#8). Findings: Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including tracheostomy, dependence on supplemental oxygen, convulsions, stroke, brain damage due to lack of oxygen, shortness of breath, and respiratory failure. A tracheostomy is a hole that is created surgically through the front of the neck and into the windpipe. A tube is inserted into the hole to keep it open for breathing and to maintain a permanent or temporary airway as indicated (retrieved on 3/25/22 from www.mayoclinic.org). Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment with assessment reference date of 1/26/22 revealed resident #8 had short and long term memory problems and severely impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making. The assessment indicated she received oxygen therapy,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-16 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure pain management was provided consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 2 sampled residents, of a total sample of 56 residents, (#637). Findings: Resident #637 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including polyneuropathy, gout, anxiety and chronic pain. Review of the New admission documentation dated 3/9/22 showed resident #637 was alert and oriented to person place and time. The pain management regimen review indicated the resident verbalized pain and his pain would be measured on a 0-10 scale. The resident was not experiencing any pain at the time of the assessment. Review of the facility policy and procedures dated 12/18/19 for Pain Management and Assessment read, Purpose: The detection of the presence of pain, determining the frequency and intensity of pain, and identification of effective pain management interventions and with evidence of new or worsening pain .On-going Pain Assessment: The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-16 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen concentrator's external filter was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner to promote oxygen flow for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for respiratory care of a total sample of 56 residents, (#132). Findings: Review of resident #132's medical record documented she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Malignant Neoplasm of the Lung with Lobectomy in 2004, Emphysema, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Bronchitis and Acute Upper Respiratory Infection. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] showed the resident received oxygen therapy. Review of the resident's plan of care dated 01/14/22 noted intervention to administer oxygen therapy as ordered, Review of resident #132's physician orders dated 12/02/21 read, continuous oxygen at 2 Liters (L) via nasal cannula. On 03/14/22 at 9:57 AM, the resident's oxygen concentrator's external filter was missing and gray dust was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to NHS MANAGEMENT — 43 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.9-0.9 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.7-0.7 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 53.7+0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.5+0.5 vs chain
The other 42 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
1 of 5Aspire Physical Recovery Center At Cahaba RiverVestavia, AL 1 of 5Aspire Physical Recovery Center At Hoover, LLCHoover, AL 1 of 5Cordova Health And Rehabilitation, LLCCordova, AL 1 of 5Glen Haven Health And Rehabilitation, LLCNorthport, AL 1 of 5Huntsville Health & Rehabilitation, LLCHuntsville, AL 1 of 5Legacy Health And Rehabilitation Of Pleasant GrovePleasant Grove, AL 1 of 5Prattville Health And Rehabilitation, LLCPrattville, AL 1 of 5St Augustine Health And Rehabilitation CenterSaint Augustine, FL 1 of 5Wetumpka Health And Rehabilitation, LLCWetumpka, AL 2 of 5Civic Center Health And Rehabilitation, LLCBirmingham, AL 2 of 5Gulf Coast Health And Rehabilitation, LLCMobile, AL 2 of 5Legacy Health And Rehabilitation CenterFort Smith, AR 2 of 5South Health And Rehabilitation, LLCBirmingham, AL 2 of 5Springdale Health And Rehabilitation CenterSpringdale, AR 2 of 5Tallassee Health And Rehabilitation, LLCTallassee, AL 3 of 5Ashland Place Health And Rehabilitation, LLCMobile, AL 3 of 5Fayetteville Health And Rehabilitation CenterFayetteville, AR 3 of 5Florala Health And Rehabilitation LLCFlorala, AL 3 of 5Hunter Creek Health And Rehabilitation, LLCNorthport, AL 3 of 5Jacksonville Health And Rehabilitation, LLCJacksonville, AL 3 of 5Northway Health And Rehabilitation, LLCBirmingham, AL 3 of 5Oak Knoll Health And Rehabilitation, LLCBirmingham, AL 3 of 5Opp Health And Rehabilitation, LLCOpp, AL 3 of 5Ozark Health And Rehabilitation, LLCOzark, AL 3 of 5Park Manor Health And Rehabilitation, LLCNorthport, AL 3 of 5South Haven Health And Rehabilitation, LLCBirmingham, AL 3 of 5Sumter Health And Rehabilitation, L L CYork, AL 4 of 5Aspire Physical Recovery Center Of West AlabamaNorthport, AL 4 of 5Columbiana Health And Rehabilitation, LLCColumbiana, AL 4 of 5Covington Court Health And Rehabilitation CenterFort Smith, AR 4 of 5Crystal River Health And Rehabilitation CenterCrystal River, FL 4 of 5Georgiana Health And Rehabilitation, LLCGeorgiana, AL 4 of 5Luverne Health And Rehabilitation, LLCLuverne, AL 4 of 5Moundville Health And Rehabilitation, LLCMoundville, AL 4 of 5Ocala Health And Rehabilitation CenterOcala, FL 4 of 5Paris Health And Rehabilitation CenterParis, AR 4 of 5Valley View Health And Rehabilitation, LLCMadison, AL 5 of 5Athens Health And Rehabilitation LLCAthens, AL 5 of 5Crossville Health And Rehabilitation, LLCCrossville, AL 5 of 5Daytona Beach Health And Rehabilitation CenterDaytona Beach, FL

Showing 40 of 42; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
JAMES N ESTES JR FAMILY DYNASTY TR NO 2Organization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST10%since 09/30/2019
JAMES NORMAN ESTES JR TROrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST6%since 06/30/2013
JENNIFER E AGEE FAMILY DYNASTY TR NO 2Organization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST10%since 09/30/2019
JENNIFER LEE ESTES TR 031093Organization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST6%since 06/30/2013
ESTES, JAMESIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER68%since 02/19/1999
REGIONS BANKOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTERESTsince 05/05/2010
CAIATI, DENISEIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 11/07/2022
MCVEA, CHERIIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/06/2022
RASCO, LYNNIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/01/2022
SCHNEIDER, JULIEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/21/2023
TONEY, DARINIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/15/2024
LONG, PHILLIPIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 10/01/2019

CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$17.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-13.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.1M
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 55%Medicare 6%Other / private 39%

This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$350per resident / day
operating cost
$10,646per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$308per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Florida Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Florida
$10,342/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,610/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 105376. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-04, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next