Paris Health And Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

42.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 44 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 72.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 44 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 27% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 140 beds and averages 112.1 residents a day — about 80% occupied, or roughly 28 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.52 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.40 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.52 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.96 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.74 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.49 to 0.20 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served in a safe and sanitary manner. Specifically, the facility failed to maintain kitchen equipment free of debris, failed to prevent potential cross-contamination from personal electronics in food preparation areas, and failed to ensure staff avoided bare-hand contact with a resident's food for one of one kitchen reviewed for food service. The findings include: During an observation on 03/02/2026 at 9:05 AM, this surveyor and Dietary Manager (DM) #4 observed the grease trap located under the griddle, which revealed an accumulation of approximately two inches of black sludge and debris. DM #4 stated the grease trap should be cleaned weekly but estimated the current accumulation had been present for a very long time. The DM was unable to state exactly when the grease trap had last been cleaned, as it was not listed on the cleaning schedule. During a concurrent observation and interview on 03/02/2026 at 12:10 PM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, record review, facility document review, facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to revise the comprehensive care plan as needed and after changes were made on the resident's 01/05/2026 quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) for one (Resident #99) of three residents. The findings include: A review of Resident #99's quarterly MDS with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 07/30/2025, revealed the resident had active diagnoses, which included depression, insomnia, and non-Alzheimer's dementia. Resident #99's MDS also revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 09, which indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. A review of Resident #99's quarterly MDS with an ARD of 01/05/2026, revealed a BIMS score of 03, which indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment. A review of a Witness Statement dated 12/13/2025, regarding an incident on 08/13/2025, revealed Resident #99 was found in Resident #13's bed with their arms on Resident #13 back, with Resident #13 trying to climb on top of Resident #99 while…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, facility document review, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an environment free of hazards and failed to provide supervision for one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed. Specifically, an electronic locking door known to have issues was not monitored or properly reported for repairs, allowing Resident #1 to elope from the facility and walk down the city street in traffic. The findings include: A review of the Resident Face Sheet, indicated the facility admitted Resident #1 on 07/11/2025 with diagnoses that included dementia, expressive language disorder, cognitive communication deficit following a stroke, muscle weakness, and unsteady on their feet. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 07/17/2025, revealed Resident #1 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 0 which indicated the resident was had severe cognitive impairment. No wandering behaviors were…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure foods stored in the freezer and dry storage area were covered, and sealed to minimize the potential for food borne illness for residents who received meals from 1 of 1 kitchen;1 of 1 ice machine in the kitchen was maintained in clean and sanitary condition to prevent food and beverage contamination and staff washed their hands between dirty and clean tasks and before handling clean equipment to minimize the potential for contaminating food items for residents who received meals from 1 of 1 kitchen. These failed practices had the potential to affect 96 residents who received meals from the kitchen. The findings are: 1. On 08/06/24 at 4:17 PM, an opened box of salt was on the shelf above the food preparation counter, the box was not covered. 2. On 08/06/24 at 4:37 PM, the ice machine in the kitchen had an accumulation of wet, black, slimy appearing residue around the area where ice forms before dropping into the ice collector. It was pointed out to the Dietary Manager and asked if the residue…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-08 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, record review, facility document review, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that physician's orders for medications were followed during medication administration for 2 (Resident #24 and #92) of 6 residents reviewed for medication administration. The surveyor observed 31 medication opportunities with 2 errors noted, which was a 6.45% error rate for the facility. Findings include: A review of a facility policy titled, 6.0 General Dose Preparation and Medication Administration, dated 01/01/2013, indicated, Facility staff should verify that the medication name and dose are correct. During an observation on 08/07/2024 at 7:45 AM, Registered Nurse (RN) #4 administered multivitamin/multimineral 1 tablet to resident #92. During an observation on 08/07/2024 at 7:54 AM, RN #4 administered calcium with vitamin D3 600 milligrams (mg)/5 micrograms (mcg). 1 tablet to resident #24. A review of Physician Orders, revealed Resident #92 had an order for multivitamin tablet, 1 tablet by mouth daily this order was ordered on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-08 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure pureed food items were blended to a smooth, lump free consistency to minimize the risk of choking or other complications for those residents who required pureed diets for 2 of 2 meals observed. The failed practice had the potential to affect 8 residents who received pureed diets. The findings are: 1. On 8/06/24 at 5:15 PM, a pan of pureed chicken alfredo to be served to the residents who required pureed diets was on the steamtable. The consistency of the pureed chicken alfredo was lumpy and not smooth. There were pieces of intact pasta visible in the mixture. 2. On 8/07/24 at 8:08 AM, the following observations were made on the steamtable during the breakfast meal service: a. A pan of pureed sausage. The consistency was gritty and not smooth. b. A pan of pureed bread. The consistency was thick. c. On 8/06/24 at 8:17 AM, the surveyor asked the Dietary Manager to describe the consistency of the pureed sausage and pureed oatmeal served to the residents at the breakfast meal. She stated, Pureed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, record review, facility document review, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to change contaminated gloves and perform hand hygiene during medication administration with a resident on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) for 1 (Resident #26) of 1 resident reviewed for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube medication administration. Findings include: A review of a facility policy titled, Hand Hygiene, dated 06/11/2020, indicated, The following is a list of some situations that require hand hygiene. Before and after direct resident care. Before and after entering isolation precaution settings. After handling soiled or used linens. A review of a facility policy titled, Enhanced Barrier Precautions, dated 04/29/2024, indicated, EBP requires donning of gown and gloves during high-contact resident care activities. EBP is employed while performing high-contact resident care activities including device care or use: feeding tube. A review of the Face Sheet, indicated the facility admitted Resident #26 with diagnosis…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure foods stored in the freezer, refrigerator, and dry storage area were covered, sealed and dated to minimize the potential for food borne illness for residents who received meals from 1 of 1 kitchen; kitchen vents were cleaned to provide a sanitary environment for food preparation; kitchen walls and door frames were free of chips, debris, dirt, grease, grime, rust, stains, and spills; wall tiles were replaced; expired dairy products and food items were promptly removed/discarded on or before the expiration or use by date to prevent the growth of bacteria; dietary staff washed their hands before handling clean equipment or food items to prevent potential food borne illness for residents who received meals from 1 of 1 kitchen; refrigerator temperatures were maintained at 41 degrees Fahrenheit or below, and cold dairy products were maintained at 41 degrees Fahrenheit or below to prevent potential food borne illness for residents who received meals from 1 of 1 kitchen. The failed practices had the potential…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident personal care equipment was properly labeled and stored to prevent the potential for cross-contamination between residents for 1 (Resident #26) of 5 (Residents #19, #26, #27, #33 and #37); failed to maintain a clean, safe, and sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infection for 3 (Residents #66, #67 and #288) of 10 sampled residents (Residents #3, #12, #22, #27, #37, #48, #53, #66, #67 and #84) sampled residents who used the resident bathrooms and failed to ensure infection prevention and control practices were implemented to prevent the development of communicable diseases and infections as evidenced by failure to sanitize hands between residents during medication administration. The failed practices had the potential to affect 14 residents on the 200 Hall who required assistance with oral care as documented on a list provided by the Assistant Administrator on 08/02/23 at 2:00 PM; 60 residents who use the resident bathrooms…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-08-04 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality. This failed practice had the potential to affect 15 residents who use tobacco products as documented on a list provided by the Assistant Administrator on 07/31/23 at 11:00 AM. The findings are: 1. On 08/01/23 at 8:51 AM, Resident #11 stated, You have to be on time to smoke or they won't let you go out to smoke. The Surveyor asked, If you are two minutes late will they let you smoke? Resident #11 stated, Not with [Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #4], but the others will. 2. On 08/01/23 at 9:29 AM, the Surveyor asked Resident #17, If you arrive late, do they still let you smoke? Resident #17 stated, If it is [CNA #4], she won't let us out to smoke. 3. On 08/02/23 at 8:15 AM, the Surveyor asked CNA #4, Do you take the residents out to smoke? CNA #4 answered, Yes. At 9:00 AM. The Surveyor asked, Have you…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to NHS MANAGEMENT — 43 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 73% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in AR