No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Driftwood Healthcare Center - Hayward

19700 Hesperian Boulevard, Hayward, CA 94541 · For profit - Corporation · 88 certified beds · (510) 785-2880 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (510) 785-2880 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Jan 20261 actual-harm citation$8,822 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (30% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jan 2026
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (41) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $8,822 in federal fines (most recent 2023-08-28)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
17251 Hesperian Blvd · (510) 276-4653 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
19661 Hesperian Blvd · (510) 731-0002 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
15590 Hesperian Blvd
Park
19501 Hesperian Blvd · (510) 881-6700 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
20777 Hesperian Blvd · (510) 880-9590

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased4.6%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.5%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%7.3%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.7%1.6%3.3%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened2.3%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication8.4%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers12.6%4.3%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control5.1%10.2%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table5.4%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%93.2%79.4%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.172.251.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.001.571.80worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

26.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 41 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

26.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.29U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.18hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 44% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF26.9%CMS range 15.6–37.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.9%CMS range 7.6–15.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened6.2%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.2%CMS range 4.0–12.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.441.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.89
RN hours/ resident / day
1.48
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.56
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.93
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.84
RN hoursweekends
30.3%
Total nursing turnover
31.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 88 beds and averages 79.2 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.93 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.89 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.56 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.64 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.04 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.91 to 0.84 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 30% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

10
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-08-09)
13
at the previous standard inspection (2022-09-02)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

41 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 30 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-04-23 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pressure ulcer (a tissue injury resulting from unrelieved pressure over an area of the body) prevention and treatment for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) when the facility failed to: · develop a care plan for Resident 1 ' s pressure ulcer upon discovery, · monitor Resident 1 ' s pressure ulcer, · provide a pressure reducing mattress, · and reposition Resident 1 off the pressure ulcer. This failure resulted in Resident 1 developing a 1 cm (centimeter, a unit of measurement) x 1cm stage 2 (a classification of the severity of the pressure ulcer, stage 1 being a reddened area with intact skin, stage 2 indicating broken skin, stage 3 indicating an injury extending into tissue under the skin, and stage 4 indicating an injury extending into muscle and/or bone) pressure ulcer on the right buttock which grew to 7 cm x 7 cm over the course of 25 days and had become abscessed (a pocket of fluid resulting from infection). Findings: A review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, for nine of 22 residents (Resident 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10) who had tracheostomy (a surgically created opening [stoma] in the front of the neck and directly into the windpipe [trachea]), the facility failed to ensure that sufficient tracheostomy inner cannula (easily removable tube inside the tracheostomy's outer tube, which catches mucus, can be cleaned or disposed of without removing the entire tracheostomy tube. This prevents airway blockages) supplies were available and immediately accessible as required for safe and effective respiratory care.This failure had the potential to place the residents at risk for infection, airway obstruction and inadequate ventilation, and delayed emergency response.During a review of facility's undated record titled Resident Face Sheet (RFS), the RFS indicated the following: -Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included encephalopathy (any disease, damage, or malfunction that alters your…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff adherence to its infection control policies and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommended (CDC, lead federal agency responsible for protecting public health and safety) transmission based precautions when a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 entered Residents 13, 14, 15, 16, 9, 8, 7, and 17's room requiring contact precautions without donning the required personal protective equipment (PPE, is equipment worn to minimize exposure to hazards that cause serious workplace injuries and illnesses). This failure exposed residents and staff to potential cross contamination and increased the risk of transmission of infectious organisms.Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/16/26 at 3:55 pm, inside the Subacute Unit, CNA 1 entered Residents 13 and 14's room with a Contact Precaution (infection-control measures used to prevent the spread of diseases transmitted through direct or indirect contact with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-05-01 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe environment for 79 out of 79 sampled residents when the patio gate latch was zip tied.This failure had the potential to result in delay in resident's evacuation in an event of emergency.Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/27/26 at 1:50 p.m. with the Maintenance Director (MD), in the patio, a black fence surrounding the patio had a gate latch secured with a white zip tie. The MD stated, he had applied the zip tie. The MD stated, there should be no zip tie. The MD stated, he applied the zip tie to prevent unnecessary people from coming in the facility. The MD stated, the gate was an access for paramedics who picked up residents in case of emergency.During an interview on 4/28/26 at 10:33 a.m. with the Receptionist, the Receptionist stated, the patio gate was used as emergency door in case there's a fire in the facility.During an interview on 4/28/26 at 10:48 a.m. with CNA 1, CNA 1 stated the MD would sometimes place a padlock on the gate because residents tried to open the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-03 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY ased on interview and record review, the skilled nursing facility failed to maintain resident confidentiality for two of the three sampled residents (Residents 1 and 2) when the licensed social worker disclosed personal information without obtaining consent from Residents 1 and 2. This resulted in a violation of resident confidentiality.During a record review of Resident 1's clinical document Resident Face Sheet (RFS), the RFS indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 in February of 2025 with multiple medical diagnosis including cerebral infarction (stroke). During a review of Resident 1's clinical document MDS 3.0 Nursing Home Comprehensive (NC) Version 1.20.1 (MDS) dated [DATE], the MDS indicated Resident 1 was alert and oriented. During a review of the document Notice of Privacy Practices (NPP), the NPP indicated Resident 1 signed a consent on 3/19/2025 acknowledging he had received a copy of the Notice of Privacy Practices which allowed the facility to release his health information for treatment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of three sampled residents (Resident 1 and 3), received tracheostomy care consistent with professional standards of practice, their physician's orders and their care plan when: 1. Resident 1's tracheostomy (a surgical procedure that creates an opening in the neck to create an artificial airway) inner cannula (a removable, lockable tube inserted into the outer tube to maintain an open airway and manage secretions) was not changed for a total of five days, including three consecutive days. 2. Resident 2 did not have the necessary emergency tracheostomy equipment at bedside. This failure had the potential to cause Residents 1 and 2 increased risk for infection and respiratory distress.During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, printed 2/24/26, the Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with a diagnosis of Acute Respiratory Failure (a life-threatening emergency where the lungs cannot properly oxygenate the blood or remove carbon dioxide).During an interview on 2/24/26…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-06 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) received Oxycodone (a medication used to treat moderate to severe pain) as ordered by their physician. This failure had the potential to cause Resident 1 unnecessary frustration and pain.During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, printed 2/5/26, the record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in 2025 with a diagnosis of cerebral infarction (A stroke that occurs when the blood supply to part of the brain is blocked or reduced), and depression. During a review of Resident 1's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, is a scoring system used to determine the resident's cognitive status regarding attention, orientation, and ability to register and recall information. A BIMS score of thirteen to fifteen is an indication of intact cognitive status.), dated 12/4/25, the Record indicated Resident 1's BIMS score was 14. During a review of Resident 1's Doctors Order, dated 11/10/25, the Order indicated Resident 1 had a doctor's prescription for Oxycodone. Take…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-28 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of six residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2) were free from physical abuse when both struck each other during a physical altercation.This resulted in Resident 1's right hand and left ear getting hurt and making him feel fearful within the facility.During a record review of Resident 1's Face Sheet (a summary of a resident's key demographics), Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE],During a record review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment instrument used to identify resident care problems to be addressed in an individualized care plan.), dated 12/24/25, MDS indicated Resident 1 had a Brief Interview for Mental status (BIMS, a scoring system used to determine the resident's cognitive status regarding attention, orientation, and ability to register and recall information) score of 13 out of 15. This score indicated Resident 1 was cognitively intact. During a record review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-22 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure immediate interventions during a resident-to-resident altercation for two sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2) when a verbal altercation between Resident 1 and Resident 2 escalated into a physical altercation without timely staff separation.This failure placed Resident 1 and Resident 2 at risk for escalation of aggressive behaviors, physical injury, and emotional distress.During a review Resident 1's Face Sheet, printed on 1/22/26, the Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in November 2023 with diagnoses of acute respiratory syndrome (life-threatening lung injury that allows fluid to leak into the lungs) and anxiety disorder (a mental health condition causing excessive and persistent fear or worry).During a review of Resident 1's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, is a scoring system used to determine the resident's cognitive status in regard to attention, orientation, and ability to register and recall…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-09 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — pattern
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff had physician order, facility policy and training to use enteral tube (tube placed into a surgically create hole leading into the gastrointestinal tract) clog removal tool and followed facility expectations when performing enteral tube clog removal care for two of 16 sampled residents (Resident 274 and 45) who were receiving medications through an enteral tube. This failure had the potential for enteral tube perforation or gastrointestinal damage when nursing staff inserted plastic clog removal tool into Resident 274 and 45's enteral tube without physician order, facility policy or training on use of the clog removal tool. Findings: A record review of Resident 274's admission record indicated Resident 274 was admitted for gastrostomy care, tracheostomy care, muscle wasting and atrophy, and chronic respiratory failure. During a review of Resident 274's physician orders set titled, Physician Order Report: 8/1/24-8/31/24, undated, the orders set indicated Resident 274 had enteral tube orders…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 14 controlled medications (substances that have an accepted medical use, medications which fall under US Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) Schedules II-V, and have a potential for abuse, ranging from low to high, and may also lead to physical or psychological dependence) from the Director of Nursing (DON) controlled medications cabinet were documented and destroyed according to state law and facility policy. This failure had resulted in 14 controlled medications not being destroyed and had the potential for drug diversion. Findings: During an interview on 8/8/24, at 10:45 a.m., with the DON, the DON stated Pharmacist Consultant 1 (PC 1) was the primary pharmacist who performed monthly destruction of controlled medications with the DON. The DON described the procedure for the disposal of controlled medications: 1. Nurse brings the discontinued controlled medications to the DON. 2. Every month, the DON and PC 1 reconciled and destroyed the controlled medications. 3. PC 1 destroyed controlled medications by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 30 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-09 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — pattern
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review. the facility failed to ensure cooks had education and skill to puree food properly for 11 of 11 residents receiving a pureed diet when they over processed and over mechanicalized food, which was watery, bland and without flavor. This failure resulted in residents being at risk for decreased satiety and nutrition intake which could result in weight loss. Findings: During an observation on 8/5/24, at 11:30 a.m., [NAME] 1 (C-1) used a handheld slotted strainer to place vegetables (mixed vegetables-cauliflower and broccoli) from cooking vessel into the blender. C-1 proceeded to puree the vegetables, periodically checking the consistency. Upon completion C-1 poured the remaining liquid into the blender which resulted in 6 cups of product. The end result was a pourable product, which resembled a slightly thick cream soup. C-1 was required to add 3-ounces of thickener, yielding vegetables which resembled a thin, pourable pudding texture. This resulted in the addition of excess cooking water being inadvertently added to blender, diluting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-09 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and record review, the facility failed to follow menu portions when serving orzo, baked apples and Boston cream pie. This failure resulted in residents receiving portion sizes in excess or below their required needs per physician order or dietician recommendation, potentially putting residents at risk for inability to maintain normal body weight and receiving acceptable nutritional values. Findings: During a concurrent observation and record review on 8/5/24, at 12:15 p.m., in the kitchen, Dietary Aide (DA-1) served ½ cup of orzo to 24/24 Controlled Carbohydrate (CCHO - a diet to keep carbohydrate consumption at a steady level) diet residents. The Spring/Summer 2024 Diet Spreadsheet, indicated CCHO diet residents should receive 1/3 cup of orzo. During a concurrent observation and record review on 8/5/24, at 12:30 p.m., in the kitchen, DA-1 used a #12 scoop (2.5-3 oz) to serve baked apples for both regular and CCHO diets. The Spring/Summer 2024 Diet Spreadsheet indicated a #10 scoop (3-4 oz) is required for serving baked apples for both regular and CCHO diets.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the juice machine was cleaned according to manufacturer's instructions when the machine was not flushed weekly and the bar gun was soaked in hot water. This failure resulted in improper sanitation and the risk for transmission of foodborne illness to 56 residents receiving juice. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/5/24, at 10:00 a.m., in the kitchen, Kitchen Aide 1 (KA-1) soaked the juice bar gun from the juice machine in a large pitcher of hot water (water with steam emanating from vessel). KA-1 stated the required cleaning included submerging and soaking the bar gun (nozzle) daily to prevent blockages or clogs caused by sugar build-up. KA-1 stated the juice bag junction (connection to juice bag) is disconnected and rinsed when each juice bag is empty. KA-1 stated they do not use a log to document the cleaning or a cleaning schedule. During a review of Lyons Bag in the Box Equipment Cleaning Procedure, the procedure indicated the bar gun should be soaked daily in luke warm…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control policy and procedure was followed for 10 of 23 sampled (Residents 21, 16, 32, 60, 3, 27, 51, 273, 272 and 59) residents when: 1. staff did not use sterile gloves when performing sterile tracheostomy (artificial airway at the throat which is kept open with a tube inserted into the opening) suctioning (procedure to remove secretions from the respiratory tract by vacuum) on Resident 21, 2. staff did not perform hand hygiene when switching between three residents (Resident 16, 32, and 60) who needed tracheostomy care, 3. facility did not have equipment to change suction canisters (a plastic container connected to a vacuum which stores liquid from suctioning) for Resident 3, 32 and 60 and did not have equipment to change the ventilator circuit (plastic tubing which connects a tracheostomy to a ventilator [a machine used to help a resident breath mechanically]) for Resident 51, 4. staff allowed open system tube feeding…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 17 sampled residents (Resident 25) received good grooming and personal hygiene care when resident did not receive complete fingernail care. This failure resulted in Resident 25 to feel helpless and placed him at risk for developing infections and hurting himself with long, pointed fingernails. Findings: A review of Resident 25's Face Sheet, printed 8/7/24, indicated resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of quadriplegia (loss of strength on all four limbs) and cerebrovascular disease (a condition that affects flow of blood in the brain and spine). A review of Resident 25's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool used to guide care) dated 6/8/24, indicated Resident 25 was understood and was able to understand others. The MDS indicated Resident 25's Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS, an assessment for cognition status) score was eight out of 15 which indicated moderately…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-09 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure consistent intervention and recommendation was carried out for tube feeds according to patient needs for (Resident 44) while tube feeds was the sole source of nutrition. This failure resulted in an unintended, unplanned weight gain of 21.27% in one year creating potential risks including: 1. Increased Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: Excess weight can lead to increased strain on the heart, potentially causing or worsening conditions such as hypertension, heart disease, and stroke. 2. Development or Worsening of Diabetes: Weight gain, particularly in the abdominal area, can lead to insulin resistance and increase the risk of developing type 2 diabetes or exacerbate existing diabetes. 3. Worsening of Respiratory Issues: Extra weight can compress the chest and diaphragm, making it harder for bed-bound patients to breathe and increasing the risk of respiratory problems, including sleep apnea. 4. Pressure Ulcers (Bedsores): Increased…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-09 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical well-being for one of 17 sampled residents (Resident 43, receiving hemodialysis [a process of filtering the blood of a person whose kidneys are not working normally] treatment) when: 1. Licensed Nurse (LN) was not fully knowledgeable about the management of care in the event of Resident 43's arterial-venous fistula (a direct connection between the artery and a vein for dialysis access) site complications, post dialysis treatment. This failure resulted in the potential that staff may not correctly perform the proper intervention and prompt physician notification for a resident's dysfunctional access site condition after return from dialysis treatment. 2. LNs failed to ensure Resident 43 received Renagel (a phosphate binder used to lower high blood phosphorus [an essential mineral found in the blood to help form strong bones, teeth, and muscles] levels in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-09 · tag F0801 — isolated
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Kitchen Manager (KM) had completed the required six hours of inservice training on the specific California dietary service requirements contained in California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 22 prior to assuming full time duties as a dietetic services supervisor at the health facility, This failure resulted in the KM not possessing competencies and skills for California to carry out food and nutrition functions, potentially putting residents at risk for foodborne illness. Findings: During an interview on 8/5//24, at 11:00 AM, with KM, KM stated she worked full time and was certified as a dietary manager. KM stated she does not have 6 hours of inservice training on the specific California dietary service requirements. During an interview on 8/5//24, at 11:00 AM, with Registered Dietician (RD), RD stated she had not administered or developed the required six hour inservice training for the KM.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-11 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper handling and delivery of respiratory care consistent with the facility's policy and procedures (P&P) and the professional standards of practice for three out of eight sampled residents (Resident 3, Resident 5, and Resident 7) when: 1. Resident 3's nasal cannula (a medical device with two prongs that is connected to an oxygen source used to deliver supplemental oxygen directly into the nostrils) was not labeled with the date it was first used; 2. Resident 5's nasal cannula and nebulizer (machine that turns liquid medicine into a mist that can be easily inhaled) simple facemask and tubing was not labeled with the date it was initially used and Resident 5's physician's orders for oxygen therapy were not followed; and, 3. Resident 7's nasal cannula was not labeled with the date it was first used and Resident 7 had no physician's order for the use of oxygen therapy. These failures had the potential to result in unsafe and unsanitary delivery of oxygen to Resident 3, Resident 5, and Resident 7.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow and maintain an effective infection prevention and control program for a census of 78 residents when: 1. Three facility staff entered a contact isolation precaution room (an isolation precaution implemented when a patient infected with a bacteria, virus, or other microorganism which is transmittable through direct or indirect contact with the patient or the patient ' s environment) without using all the required personal protective equipment (PPE); and, 2. Resident 3 and Resident 7's nasal cannula, and Resident 5's respiratory care tubing were not labeled with the date it was initially used. These failures resulted in an increased risk for cross-contamination (movement or transfer of harmful bacteria from one person, object, or place to another), potential exposure of Resident 3, Resident 7, and Resident 5 to germs, and may cause infection among residents, staff, and visitors. Findings: 1. During an observation on 3/11/24 at 12:58…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-11 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide preventive care for pressure injury/ulcer (PI/PU, injury to skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure) consistent with professional standards of practice for one of eight sampled residents (Resident 8) when Resident 8's physician's order of turning and repositioning every two hours was not consistently implemented. This failure resulted in Resident 8's sacral (lower back near the crease of the buttocks) wound to get worse and had the potential for Resident 8's skin condition to get worse, develop complications, and/or possible development of other pressure related injuries. Findings: A review of Resident 8's clinical record indicated Resident 8 was admitted July of 2023 and had diagnoses that included respiratory failure (a serious condition that develops when the lungs can't get enough oxygen into the blood and makes it difficult for a person to breathe on his own), nontraumatic subdural hemorrhage (a condition where a pool of blood is formed between the brain and the skull causing structural,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were secure for a census of 76, when 3 medication carts were found unlocked and unattended. This failure had the potential to expose residents, staff, and visitors to unauthorized access to medications, resulting in possible injury or drug diversion. Findings: During an observation on 3/7/24 at 12:49 p.m., in the sub-acute hall, 3 medication carts up against the wall, side by side were unattended and unlocked. During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/7/24 at 12:55 p.m., with the Licensed Nurse (LN) 1, LN 1 confirmed the carts with prescription medications were unlocked. LN 1 stated, We lock the carts usually before we leave them. We all have keys. Just to be safe from anyone, residents or staff, getting into the cart. During an interview on 3/7/24 at 4:05 p.m., with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON stated, I would expect the nurses to lock the carts before leaving them, for the safety of the other residents which could get into them and take the medications. During a review of the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-09-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and distribute food in a safe and sanitary manner when: 1. Expired food items were found in the dry storage rack in kitchen; 2. Freezer 1 temperature was not reaching Zero (0) degree Fahrenheit and lower; 3. There was no air gap (a gap of air between the floor and a drainpipe to prevent backflow of sewage into the equipment) for food preparation sink; 4. There was no proper air gap in the ice machine; 5. Microwave was not cleaned and had food residue on the top inside surface; and 6. Kitchen counter under the steamer was sticky and dusty. These failures had the potential to cause food borne illnesses for 59 residents who received food from the kitchen for a facility census of 75. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/30/22, at 9:30 a.m., with Registered Dietician (RD), the dry storage rack in the kitchen had 1 X 28 oz ground cinnamon, 1 X 28 oz chili powder, 1 X 28 oz bay leaves with use by date 8/13/22. RD stated the ground cinnamon, chili powder and bay…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-09-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed proper standard and transmission-based precautions to prevent the spread of infection when: 1. Laundry Staff (LS 1) stored personal items in the clean linen/laundry area; 2. Oxygen (O2) tubing was not labeled and dated for Residents 34, 39, and 57; 3. Licensed Vocation Nurse (LVN) 2 did not perform hand hygiene during medication administration; and 4. LVN 2 did not clean/disinfect the shared blood pressure (BP) machine and medication tray in between residents; and These failures had the potential to result in cross contamination and spread of infections for Residents 34, 39, 57 and other residents in the facility. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 9/01/22, at 1:33 p.m., LS 1, a [NAME]-colored sweater, grayish blue sweater, brown sweater, pink purse, a personal plant, a coffee maker, a refrigerator with one opened soda can and one unopened soda can, carrots, one Jello, strawberries, one…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-09-02 · tag F0638 — pattern
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to complete 17 of 18 sampled residents' (Residents 6, 9, 32, 33, 11, 27, 16, 3, 5, 2, 10, 29, 4, 21, 37, 12 and 19) Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool to guide resident care) assessments within 92 calendar days. This failure resulted in Residents 6, 9, 32, 33, 11, 27, 16, 3, 5, 2, 10, 29, 4, 21, 37, 12 and 19 to not receive a timely assessment and had the potential to delay resident's care based on their individual physical and psychosocial needs. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review with MDS coordinator (MDSC), on 9/1/22, at 12:07 p.m., Section Z of the MDS assessments for 18 residents were reviewed. Review of the completion dates of last two MDS assessments for 17 residents indicated: Residents 6, 9, 11, 3, 5, 2, 10, 4, and 12 did not have a completed MDS assessment between 3/2022 and 8/2022. Residents 32, 33, 27, 16, 29, 21, 19 did not have a completed MDS assessment between 4/2022 and 8/2022. Resident 37 did not have a completed MDS assessment between 1/2022 and 6/2022. MDSC stated the MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure three of five sampled residents (Resident 51, 43 and 75) received grooming and personal hygiene care when: 1. Resident 51 and 43 had long, sharp fingernails with black matter underneath on both hands; and 2. Resident 75 did not receive toenail care. These failures resulted in Residents 51, 43 and 75 to feel helpless and placed them at risk for developing infections and hurting themselves with long nails. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 51's Face Sheet, printed 9/2/22, the face sheet indicated Resident 51 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had medical diagnoses including hemiplegia (weakness of one side of body) and hemiparesis (loss of strength on one side of the body) following cerebral infarction (Stroke) affecting unspecified side. During a record review of Resident 51's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool used to guide care) dated 5/21/2022, the MDS Section G indicated, Resident 51 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-09-02 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure three of seven sampled residents (Resident 15, 27 and 484) received medications without an error. The facility's medication pass observation during the survey resulted in seven errors out of 25 opportunities and indicated a medication error rate of 28 percent (%). This failure placed Residents 15, 27 and 484 at risk for not getting the full therapeutic effect of their prescribed medications and had the potential to result in undesired health care outcomes. Findings: During a record review of Resident 484's admission Record Report, dated 9/2/22, it indicated Resident 484 was admitted to the facility on 8/2022 with diagnosis of Type 2 diabetes mellitus (a chronic condition which affects the way body process blood glucose levels). During a record review of Resident 484's Physician orders, dated 9/1/22-9/30/22, the orders indicated Resident 484 had an to administer Metformin (diabetes medication) 1000 milligrams (mg) by mouth two times a day with breakfast and dinner. Further review of Resident 484's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-02 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe medication and biological storage when: 1. Seven expired hypodermic needles (needle used to inject a substance), one expired COVID-19 (a respiratory virus) antigen test kit were stored in the medication storage room; 2. One expired intravenous (IV) connector and Maxitrol (medication to treat swelling of the eye) eye ointment for a resident no longer in the facility (Resident 485) was found in the subacute Medication Cart 2; and 3. 10 loose pills and Resident 72's Humalog (blood sugar medication) was opened for more than 28 days were stored in the Medication Cart 2. These failures had the potential of exposing residents to drugs and biologicals with questionable potency and efficacy. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on [DATE], at 10:30 a.m., with Registered Nurse (RN) 4, in the medication storage room, seven hypodermic needles with expiration date [DATE] and one COVID-19 antigen test with expiration…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-09-02 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow its pneumonia vaccination policy and procedure for three of five sampled residents (Residents 5, 6, and 70) when the pneumococcal vaccine was not provided to Residents 5, 6, and 70. This failure had the potential for Resident 5, 6 and 70 to contract and develop a pneumococcal infection. Findings: During an interview and record review on 9/2/22, at 10:10 a.m., with the Infection Preventionist (IP), Resident 5, Resident 6, and Resident 70's immunization records were reviewed. IP stated he could not find any prior history of pneumococcal vaccination for Residents 5, 6 and 70. IP stated Residents 5, 6, and 70 stayed in the facility for more than one year. IP stated the facility obtained a verbal consent for pneumococcal vaccination from Resident 5 on 8/1/22 and Resident 70 on 8/8/22. IP stated he did not obtain consent from Resident 6 for the pneumococcal vaccination. During a review of facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Policy: Pneumococcal Vaccine, dated 6/22/22, the P&P indicated, prior to or upon…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-02 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately code rehabilitative services and functional status for one of 18 sampled residents (Resident 5) Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool to guide resident care) assessment. This failure resulted in an inaccurate reflection of Restorative Nursing Aide (RNA) interventions and functional status for Resident 5 and had the potential for Resident 5 to not receive care to meet their needs. Findings: During a record review of Resident 5's admission Record, the record indicated Resident 5 was admitted to the facility on 7/2002. The record indicated Resident 5 had a diagnosis of quadriplegia (condition where all four extremities have paralysis of varying degree). During a concurrent observation and interview with Resident 5, on 9/1/22, at 8:45 a.m., Resident 5 was lying in bed. Resident 5 was able to move upper extremities minimally and was not able to move lower extremities at all. Resident 5 stated he had contractures in both hands. Resident 5 stated he was dependent on staff to assist him with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the fall prevention care plan for one of one sampled resident (Resident 40) when Resident 40 did not receive frequent monitoring every 15 minutes after experiencing three falls within a one month period. This failure resulted in Resident 5 experiencing three falls, not receiving individualized care and placing Resident 5 at risk of further falls and avoidable injuries. Findings: During a review of Resident 40's undated admission Record, the record indicated Resident 40 was admitted to the facility in 2018, with diagnoses of muscle weakness, difficulty walking, and dementia with behavioral disturbance (a group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning such as memory loss and judgement). During a record review of Resident 40's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a standardized resident assessment and care screening tool), dated 7/23/22, indicated Resident 40 had moderately impaired cognitive function (mental function of acquiring knowledge and understanding through experiences and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-02 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the physician's order for one of three sampled residents (Resident 26) with a risk of developing pressure sores when the physician's order to apply heel protectors for Resident 26 was not followed. This failure put Resident 26 at risk for developing pressure ulcers or injury to both heels. Findings: Review of Resident 26's undated Face Sheet indicated Resident 26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Hemiplegia and hemiparesis (muscle weakness on one side of the body making it hard to perform everyday activities like eating or dressing; may also cause loss of balance), disorder of muscle, and lack of coordination. Resident 26 was observed from 8/30/22 through 9/1/22 at various times. Resident 26 was observed lying on his back in bed without heel protectors at all times. During an interview with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, on 9/1/22, at 11:55 a.m., LVN 1 stated she was not aware Resident 26…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-02 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure appropriate indwelling catheter (a tube inserted into the urinary bladder which drains urine into a drainage bag outside the body) care for one of eight sampled residents (Resident 179) when Resident 179's. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 179 to develop an infection or a urinary tract infection. Findings: A review of Resident 179's undated Face Sheet indicated Resident 179 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure (serious condition that makes it difficult to breathe on your own). During an observation on 8/30/22, at 10:05 a.m., at Resident 179's bedside, Resident 179's indwelling catheter bag was full and there was urine in the tubing. During an interview on 8/30/22, at 10:25 a.m., with Registered Nurse (RN) 1, RN 1 stated resident 179's indwelling catheter bag was overflowed. RN 1 stated the night shift Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) should have emptied the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-02 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the tracheostomy care policy and procedure and provide one of 23 residents (Resident 35) tracheostomy (a surgical opening on the neck for placing a breathing tube) care consistent with professional standards of practice when Resident 35's tracheostomy had thick greenish matter around the tracheostomy opening and soiled dressing around the stoma site (the opening in the neck where the tracheostomy tube is placed). This deficient practice placed Resident 35 at risk for airway obstruction, skin irritation, and infection. Findings: Review of Resident 35's undated Face Sheet indicated Resident 35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Acute Respiratory Failure (a condition that makes it difficult to breathe on your own), and encounter for attention to tracheostomy (use of tracheostomy for breathing). During observation on 8/30/22, at 11:10 a.m., at Resident 35's bedside, Resident 35 had thick greenish matter…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-08-29 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an environment that promoted dignity while dining for one of 22 (Resident 9) sampled residents when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 remained standing while assisting Resident 9 with his meal. For Resident 9, this deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 9 receiving an undignified dining assistance. Findings: Review of the Resident Face Sheet, printed 8/27/19, indicated Resident 9 admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included hemiplegia (muscle weakness to one side of the body) and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). During an observation on 8/27/19, at 7:48 a.m., Resident 9 was sitting up in bed, CNA 1 stood on the left side of Resident 9's bed and assisted Resident 9 with breakfast. Review of Resident 9's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], indicated Resident 9 required the extensive assistance of one staff person for eating. In an interview on 8/27/19, at 7:48 a.m., CNA 1 stated she remained standing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-08-29 · tag F0640 — isolated
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, for one (Resident 1) of 22 sampled residents, the facility failed to transmit Resident 1's admission and quarterly Minimum Data Sets (MDS - an assessment tool used to direct care) within the allowable timeframes after completing Resident 1's admission and quarterly MDS assessments. This deficient practice resulted in the delay of resident-specific information to reflect Resident 1's overall status, necessary for the provision of care. Findings: Review of the Resident Face Sheet, dated 8/28/19, indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the facility's document titled CMS Submission Report MDS 3.0 NH Final Validation Report, not dated, indicated Resident 1's admission MDS was submitted to the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) on 1/29/19. Further review of this document, indicated the target date was 1/19/19. Review of a document titled CMS Submission Report MDS 3.0 NH Final Validation Report,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, for one of 22 sampled residents (Resident 79) the facility failed to provide the necessary care to maintain personal hygiene when Resident 79 did not receive assistance with shaving for a week. This failure resulted in Resident 79 having long facial and neck hair growth. Findings: Review of Resident 79's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool used to guide care), dated 7/3/19, indicated Resident 79 required the extensive physical assistance of one staff person for personal hygiene that included combing his hair and shaving his facial hair. The MDS also indicated Resident 79 was cognitively intact (had the ability to clearly think, reason, and remember). In an observation and concurrent interview on 8/26/19, at 8:59 a.m., Resident 79 was noted with visible facial hair down to the neck. Resident 79 stated he needed a shave badly and it had been a week since he was last shaved. During concurrent interviews on 8/27/19, at 7:43 a.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) stated it was the Certified Nursing Assistants' (CNAs)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, for one of 22 sampled residents (Resident 17), the facility failed to ensure that drugs were stored in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions for use when Resident 17's Lantus insulin (injectable medication that treats diabetes) vial was stored in the medication cart beyond use by date. This failure had the potential to result in diminished efficacy of these medications. Findings: Review of Resident 17's Face Sheet, printed 8/29/19, indicated Resident 17 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included Type 2 diabetes mellitus (a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar). Review of Resident 17's Physician Order Report, dated 8/1/19 - 8/29/19, indicated Resident 17 had a physician's order to receive 23 units of Lantus (a blood sugar medication) at bedtime every night. During an observation and concurrent interview with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 2 on 8/28/19, at 2:03 p.m., Medication Cart 3 had Resident 17's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-08-29 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain accurate medical records on one ( Resident 133) of 22 sampled residents when Resident 133 did not have an entry tracking record completed upon returning to the facility. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 133 not being listed on the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) facility census and had the potential for Resident 133 to not receive care and services that were needed. Findings: Review of Resident 133's Face Sheet, dated 8/28/19, indicated Resident 133 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Review of the CMS Long Term Care Survey Process (LTCSP) census, indicated Resident 133 was not listed in the system. Review of a document titled MDS 3.0 Assessments, not dated, indicated Resident 133's entry tracking for 8/6/19 due status was late. During an interview with the Minimum Data Set Coordinator (MDSC) on 8/26/19 at 10:42 a.m., MDSC stated Resident 133 was initially admitted to the facility on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2022-09-02 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop, implement and maintain an ongoing effective Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) plan for infection prevention and control which was identified as a facility-wide problem at the facility. (Cross Reference F880) This failure had the potential to place all 75 residents residing at the facility at a higher risk of morbidity and mortality due to spread of infections. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review with Administrator (Admin), on 9/2/22, at 1:24 p.m., the facility's QAPI plans for the months of 07/200 and 08/2022 were reviewed. Admin stated Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) committee met to discuss, implement and evaluate QAPI plans to address facility-wide quality issues that impacted resident care on a monthly basis. Admin stated QAA committee consisted of Admin, Director of Nursing, Medical Director, consulting Pharmacist and Director of Staff Development. Admin stated facility was aware that Infection Control was an actively ongoing problem for the facility, but QAA…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$8,822 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-08-28
  • $4,235 — penalty dated 2023-08-21

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MARINER HEALTH CARE — 17 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 53.6-0.6 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.9-0.9 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 54.2-0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.4+0.6 vs chain
The other 16 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.6★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
GC OPERATING COMPANY LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST99%since 08/27/2014
GRANCARE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 11/17/2010
MARINER HEALTH CARE, INC.Organization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 11/17/2010
MHC HOLDING COMPANYOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 11/17/2010
MHC WEST HOLDING COMPANYOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 11/17/2010
NATIONAL SENIOR CARE, INC.Organization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 11/17/2010
GRUNSTEIN, EMILYIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/06/2019
CAPITAL FUNDING LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTERESTsince 06/01/2015
MARTINEZ, PATRICIAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/16/2020
SARCAUGA, DENNISIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/06/2025
DHUGGA, GURPREETIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2023
KRAM, JERROLDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/25/2023
DRIFTWOOD HAYWOOD HOLDING COMPANY GP LLCOrganizationGENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTERESTsince 08/27/2014

CMS files one row per role, so the 21 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$14.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-1.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.9M
Related-party expense13% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 77%Medicare 10%Other / private 13%

About 77% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$529per resident / day
operating cost
$16,076per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$523per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555533. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-08-09, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next