Inglewood Health Care Center
100 S. Hillcrest Blvd, Inglewood, CA 90301 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 99 certified beds · (310) 677-9114 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (34% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Feb 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (85) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $27,356 in federal fines (most recent 2026-01-14)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 10.3% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.2% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.0% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.7% | 7.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.6% | 1.6% | 3.3% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 1.5% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 6.9% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.6% | 4.3% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 2.4% | 10.2% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 6.5% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.5% | 1.5% | 1.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 94.4% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 18.7% | 23.0% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 4.9% | 11.2% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.32 | 2.25 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.37 | 1.57 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
33.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 67 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 35.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 54 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.35 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 59% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 41% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 33.7%CMS range 24.0–43.7 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 12.4%CMS range 8.6–16.5 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 35.2% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 42.6% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 38.9% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 98.8% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 95.7% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 90.9% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.3%CMS range 4.4–13.0 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.22 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 89.7 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.11 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.36 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.73 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.90 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.19 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.40 to 0.27 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 34% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
85 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 73 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2025-08-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe dietary services were provided to 88 of 93 residents who were served food from the kitchen, when:1. On 8/13/2025, from 5:30 am to 2:25 pm, liquid eggs (processed form of whole eggs, also known as cartoned eggs) were thawed (defrost) at room temperature (ambient temperature [actual temperature] measured by a thermometer around 73 degrees Fahrenheit ([ F]- a unit of temperature) without monitoring the time and temperatures. Liquid eggs were at 55 F which was within the danger zone [41-135 F] temperature range where bacteria grow quickly). 2. On 8/13/2025 from 12:10 p.m. to 1:30 p.m., ground beef was thawed at room temperature without time and temperature monitoring. At 12:10 p.m., the ground beef was at 64 F. At 1:30 p.m., [NAME] 3 placed the ground beef back into the refrigerator (fridge). 3. [NAME] 1 failed to check food temperatures (refers to the safe internal cooking temperatures for various types of food to prevent foodborne illnesses) of the regular, mechanical soft and pureed food…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), who was assessed as being at risk (likelihood) for elopement (leaving the facility unsupervised) and wandering (walking/ travelling from place to place, without any clear aim or purpose) out of the facility and being high risk for falls with a history of multiple falls, was monitored and whereabouts (location in the facility) checked. This failure resulted in Resident 1 wandering out from the facility on 1/9/2026 without the facility's knowledge and supervision leading to the resident's fall and sustaining left hand fourth (4th) and fifth (5th) fingers fracture (brake in bone), left frontal scalp hematoma (a collection or pool of blood that forms outside of blood vessels) and intracranial (within the cranium [skull] the bony dome that houses and protects the brain) hemorrhage (bleeding). Resident 1 was transferred to the General Acute Care Hospital (GACH) 1 on 1/10/2026 for further…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-25 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow its grievance process for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) by failing to:Provide written notification of the grievance investigation results and actions taken.Ensure grievance reports were signed.Make the reports available to the resident or the resident's representative. These failures had the potential to result in delayed communication of grievance outcomes, prevent the resident or resident representative from determining whether concerns were adequately investigated and resolved, and impede the residents ability to exercise their right to appeal, request further review, or pursue additional actions regarding unresolved concerns and impact resident well-being. During a review of Resident 1' s Resident Face Sheet, the Resident Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 1's diagnoses included diabetes mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) who refused the covid vaccine and the facility failed to reassess the resident's vaccination status or offer vaccination again during a facility-wide COVID-19 outbreak.This failure had the potential to compromise the resident's health, safety and wellbeing. During a review of Resident 1' s Resident Face Sheet, the Resident Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 1's diagnoses included diabetes mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), hemiplegia (total paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body) and schizoaffective disorder (a mental illness that can affect thoughts, mood, and behavior).During a review of Resident 1's History and Physical (H&P) dated 9/2/2025, the H&P indicated Resident 1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-25 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide treatment, care, and documentation in accordance with accepted professional standards of practice for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) by failing to:1.Respond to a Certified Nursing Assistant's (CNA's) written report of a change in condition for Resident 1, communicated through the facility's Stop and Watch process (a process whereby CNAs alert licensed staff via a form in writing of a resident's change in condition).Specifically, the Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) did not utilize the facility's Stop and Watch communication tool after it was presented by the CNA, delaying appropriate nursing evaluation of the reported change in condition.2.Ensure accurate and timely nursing documentation when the Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) inaccurately documented that Resident 1 had two sacral wounds on 5/20/2026 leaving the inaccurate documentation in Resident 1's medical record for 34 days.These failures were not consistent with accepted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-15 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their policy and procedure (P/P) titled, Medication Administration General Guidelines which indicated to identify residents using at least two resident identifiers by checking the identification band (patient identification bracelet), checking the photograph attached to medical record and/or verifying resident identification with other nursing care center personnel before administering medication, for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential to cause medication errors, allergic reactions and life-threatening consequences for Resident 1.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of anemia (a condition where the body does not have enough healthy read blood cells), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(COPD- a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing) and contusion (bruise) of the left…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) was provided timely transportation to a dialysis (a type of treatment that helps to remove extra fluid and waste products from your blood when the kidneys cannot) treatment appointment. This deficient practice caused Resident 1 to be late for his dialysis treatment which caused a shortened and incomplete dialysis treatment, placing Resident 1 at risk for a decline in his medical condition. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE]. Resident 1 diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease([COPD]- a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing), end stage renal disease ([ESRD] -irreversible kidney failure), and dependence on renal dialysis (a life-sustaining requirement for patients with ESRD where the kidneys can no longer filter toxins and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-21 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to meet professional standards of quality for 2 of 6 sampled residents, Resident 1 and Resident 5, by failing to ensure:1). Scheduled medications were administered in a timely manner in accordance to their physician's order.2). Medications were not left at Resident 1's bedside.3). The medication nurse administered and observe Resident 1 swallowed her medications.These failures had the potential to decrease the drug's therapeutic levels when given late, the potential for Resident 1 not taking her scheduled medications and for other residents to take Resident 1's medications out from her bedside and drink it, causing harm and severe drug interactions.Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 1's diagnoses included type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a discharge care plan for one of three sampled residents (Resident 3). This deficient practice had the potential to place Resident 3 at risk for an unsafe discharge with poor outcomes such as medication errors, missed follow-up appointments and lack of necessary home care support.Findings:During a review of Resident 3's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including peripheral vascular diseases (PVD-a slow progressive narrowing of the blood flow to the arms and legs), diabetes mellitus (DM- a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), obesity (chronic disease characterized by excessive body fat) and hypertension (high blood pressure). During a review of Resident 3's History and Physical (H&P) dated 7/31/2025, the H&P indicated Resident 3 had the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 3's Minimum…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report the resident to resident allegations of abuse for the three (3) of 7 sampled residents, (Residents 1, 2 and 3), as indicated in its policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Abuse Prevention Program, when:1). On 3/31/2026, Resident 2 scratched Resident 1 while Resident 1 was entering the dining room. Resident 1 sustained wound on the chin measuring 1 X 0.2 (unit of measurement not indicated) and to the upper lip measuring 0.2 (unit of measurement not indicated) with minimal blood noted.2). On 3/10/2026, Resident 3 slapped Resident 2 who was sitting in a chair, in the hallway.3). On 3/10/2026, Resident 3 was hitting residents and staff.4). On 3/14/2026, Resident 3 swung purse at Resident 1.5). On 3/25/2026, Resident 3 hit Resident 1. This failure delayed the investigation by the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) and placed the affected residents and other residents at risk for further abuse causing residents humiliation and severe injuries,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH), the verbal altercation (a noisy, angry dispute) on 2/3/2026, between the Social Services Director (SSD) and one of three residents' (Resident 1). This deficient practice delayed the investigation by the CDPH and placed Resident 1 at risk for verbal abuse.Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 1's diagnoses included morbid (severe) obesity due to excess calories (chronic disease characterized by having excessive body fat that poses an immediate, serious risk to health, resulting from consistently consuming more energy than the body burns) and hypertension (high blood pressure). During a review of Resident 1's History and Physical (H&P) dated 8/20/2025, the H&P indicated Resident 1 had the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-24 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to investigate the Social Services Director (SSD) and one of three residents' (Resident 1) verbal altercation (a noisy, angry dispute) on 2/3/2026, as indicated in the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled Abuse Investigation & Reporting. This deficient practice placed Resident 1 at risk for verbal abuse (the use of oral, written or gestured language that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory terms to residents or their families, within their hearing distance regardless of their age, ability to comprehend or disability) and psychosocial harm.Findings: 1). During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 1's diagnoses included morbid (severe) obesity due to excess calories (chronic disease characterized by having excessive body fat that poses an immediate, serious risk to health, resulting from consistently consuming more energy than the body burns)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 73 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-24 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Social Services Director (SSD) acted in accordance with the professional standards when interacting to one of three sampled residents, (Resident 1). This failure had the potential to affect the resident's psychosocial well-being, leading to emotional harm.Findings: 1). During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 1's diagnoses included morbid (severe) obesity due to excess calories (chronic disease characterized by having excessive body fat that poses an immediate, serious risk to health, resulting from consistently consuming more energy than the body burns) and hypertension (high blood pressure). During a review of Resident 1's History and Physical (H&P) dated 8/20/2025, the H&P indicated Resident 1 had the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool) dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-28 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to honor one of two residents (Resident 1) request, not to have a male Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) assigned to provide care for activities of daily living (ADLs -routine tasks/activities such as bathing, dressing and toileting a person performs daily to care for themselves). This deficient practice violated resident's rights and had the potential to affect the resident's psychosocial well-being. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 1's diagnoses included cerebral infarction (loss of blood flow to part of the brain), Diabetes Mellitus Diabetes Mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities). During a review of Resident 1's Care Plan titled, Resident Refuses Male CNA Care, dated 8/30/2025, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report Influenza A (viral infection that attacks the respiratory system, including the nose, throat, and lungs) outbreak on 2/2/2026, for two of eight residents (Residents 1 and 8), to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) within 24 hours, as indicated in the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled Unusual Occurrence Reporting. This failure resulted in delayed investigation by the CDPH.Findings: 1). During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE]. Resident 1's diagnoses included heart failure (a heart disorder which causes the heart to not pump the blood efficiently, sometimes resulting in leg swelling), stage four chronic kidney disease (severe kidney impairment), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing). The admission record indicated Resident 1 was self-responsible. During a review of Resident 1's History…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Nurse Practitioner's (NP) verbal order of Tamiflu (medication to treat the Influenza [viral infection that attacks the respiratory system, including the nose, throat, and lungs]) for one of three residents (Resident 1), was transcribed to a telephone order form, the Medication Administration Record (MAR, a daily documentation record used by a licensed nurse to document medications and treatments given to a resident) and notify the pharmacy, as indicated in the facility's policy and procedure titled Physician Orders.This failure resulted in Resident 1 missing two doses of Tamiflu on 2/2/2026 and 2/3/2026.Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE]. Resident 1's diagnoses included heart failure (a heart disorder which causes the heart to not pump the blood efficiently, sometimes resulting in leg swelling), stage four chronic kidney disease (severe kidney…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-06 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one out of five sampled residents (Resident 1) was free from abuse when a Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA 1) kicked Resident 1's right shin (the front of the leg below the knee). This deficient practice resulted in Resident 1 sustaining pain and a purplish discoloration to the right shin. This deficient practice had to potential to cause Resident 1 to not feel safe in the facility. Findings:During a review of Resident 1's Face Sheet, the face sheet indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 1's diagnoses included metabolic encephalopathy (a problem in the brain, when the imbalance affects the brain, it can lead to personality change), osteoporosis (weak and brittle bones due to lack of calcium and Vitamin D), and dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities). During a review of Resident 1's History and Physical (H&P), dated 5/28/2025, the H&P indicated Resident 1 did not have the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-12-05 · tag F0887 — widespreadEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to:1. Maintain the COVID vaccination status for 19 employees.This deficient practice had to the potential to cause a delay in response in the event of an outbreak, since the unvaccinated staff cannot be easily identified.During a concurrent interview and record review on 12/4/2025 at 8:00 a.m. with the Infection Prevention Nurse (IPN), a binder titled Staff Vaccination 2025 was reviewed. The binder indicated 19 employees declined to receive a COVID vaccine. The IPN stated she cannot show documentation of what staff are vaccinated. The IPN stated she is supposed to offer the vaccine to all staff. The IPN further stated it is important to know who is or is not vaccinated in case there is an outbreak. It will be easier to track where the outbreak may have started if you know who is not vaccinated.During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, COVID-19 Vaccination-Staff, (no date), the P&P indicated the infection preventionist maintains a tracking worksheet of staff members and their vaccination status.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, and sanitary environment when an air filter in the hallway for four of four sampled Residents (Residents 13, Resident 33, Resident 67, and Resident 99) was full of dust and gray, fuzzy substance accumulation.This deficient practice had the potential to exposing residents to an environment that was unclean, and negatively impacting residents' comfort, safety, and quality of life.Findings:a. During a review of Resident 13's admission Record (Face sheet), the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 13 on 12/3/2024 with diagnoses including acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (a life-threatening condition where the lungs cannot get enough oxygen into the blood), shortness of breath, heat failure, and sepsis (a life-threatening blood infection).During a review of Resident 13's History and Physical (H&P) dated 1/15/2025, the H&P indicated the resident was alert, cooperative, had normal affect (a person shows a healthy, appropriate, and varied range of emotional…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to:1. Ensure linen was folded using proper technique to prevent recontamination.This deficient practice put residents at risk of infection if they came in contact with the contaminated linen.2. Ensure the Laundry Aide did not pour a chemical into a new unlabeled/uncovered container in the laundry room.3. Ensure air purifier filter in the hallway was maintained in a clean condition for four of four sampled Residents (Residents 13, Resident 33, Resident 67, and Resident 99) when the air filter was full of dust and fuzzy, grey buildup accumulation.This deficient practice had the potential to increase the risk of airborne particle (tiny solid or liquid particles in the air) accumulation in the hallway, which could contribute to the spread of infection among residents.4. Ensure the ice machine in the kitchen was maintained in a clean and sanitary condition. This deficient practice had the potential to expose residents to contaminated ice, increasing the risk of foodborne illness. 1. During a concurrent observation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-05 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure two of five sampled residents (Resident 78 and Resident 98) was provided with goods and services when1.Resident 98 had notified staff he would like to retrieve his vehicle.2. Staff were standing over Resident 78 while assisting with eating lunch.These deficient practices of not providing goods and services for Resident 98 to escort him to retrieve his vehicle had the potential for him to feel unacknowledged of his needs and placed Resident 78 at increased risk for choking, aspiration, or inadequate monitoring of the resident's tolerance during meals.1.During a review of Resident 98's admission Record ([Face Sheet] front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 98 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 98's diagnoses included respiratory failure (the lungs can't adequately oxygenate the blood or remove carbon dioxide), osteoarthritis (a progressive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-05 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure one of five sampled residents (Resident 98) walking cane was located when Resident 98 notified Social Worker Director (SSD) the walking cane was missing.This deficient practice of not promptly resolving Resident 98's grievance of the missing walking cane had the potential for Resident 98 to feel the SSD did not want to help him replace the walking cane. During a review of Resident 98's admission Record ([Face Sheet] front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 98 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 98's diagnoses included respiratory failure (the lungs can't adequately oxygenate the blood or remove carbon dioxide), osteoarthritis (a progressive disorder of the joints, caused by a gradual loss of cartilage), and heart failure (the heart can't pump enough blood to meet the body's needs). During a review of Resident 98's History and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-05 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one of five sampled residents (Resident 10) Minimum Data Set ([MDS] a resident assessment tool) was filled out accurately.This deficient practice of not accurately completing the MDS had the potential for Resident 10 goods and services not to be met while residing at the facility. During a review of Resident 10 's admission Record ([Face Sheet] front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 10 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 10's diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ([COPD]- a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing), respiratory failure (when the body's respiratory system is unable to exchange oxygen and carbon dioxide properly), and heart failure (heart muscle can't pump enough blood to meet the body's needs). During a review of Resident 10's History and Physical (H&P), dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-05 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR- a federal requirement to help ensure that individuals are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care) was completed for one of one resident (Resident 2).This failure had the potential to result in an inappropriate placement and delay in needed services for Resident 2.Findings:During a review of Resident 2's Face Sheet (admission Record), the Face Sheet indicated the facility admitted Resident 2 on 8/13/2025 and was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses psychosis (when a person has trouble telling the difference between what is real and what is not real not) due to substance or known physiological (normal, healthy functioning of a living body) condition.During a review of Resident 2's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a resident assessment tool) dated 8/19/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 2 was taking antipsychotic (a type of medicine used to treat symptoms of mental disorder)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-05 · tag F0675 — failed to support quality of life — isolatedHonor each resident's preferences, choices, values and beliefs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure one of five sample residents (Resident 4) meal tray was properly set up with containers unopened and within reach for Resident 4 to eat breakfast. This deficient practice of not setting up Resident 4's meal tray had the potential for delay in Resident 4's ability to eat his food and placed him at risk for inadequate nutrition and compromised dignity. Findings:During a review of Resident 4's admission Record ([Face Sheet] front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 4 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 4's diagnoses contractures (painful, permanent tightening and shortening of muscles causing joints to become stiff and their lose their normal range of motion), protein-calorie malnutrition ( a severe form of undernutrition from insufficient intake of protein and calories), and adult failure to thrive (progressive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure two of two residents (Resident 18 and Resident 52) was supervised by staff while smoking. This failure had the potential to result to resident injury.Findings: a. During a review of Resident 52's Face Sheet (admission Record), the Face Sheet indicated the facility admitted Resident 52 on 9/26/2025 with diagnoses including acute respiratory failure, systemic lupus erythematosus (lupus - an ongoing disease where the body's immune system gets confused and attacks its own healthy tissues and organs by mistake), obstructive and reflux uropathy (when urine flows backward from the bladder up toward the kidneys), acute kidney failure, and benign prostatic hyperplasia (enlarged prostate gland). During a review of Resident 52's History and Physical (H&P) dated 9/27/2025, indicated Resident 52 had the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 52's Minimum Data Set (MDS – a resident assessment tool) dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure one of one resident's (Resident 8) oxygen tubing was labeled with the date the tubing was last changed. This failure had the potential for Resident 8 to receive oxygen through compromised oxygen tubing and increasing the risk of infection while receiving oxygen therapy.Findings:During a review of Resident 8's Face Sheet (admission Record), the Face Sheet indicated the facility admitted the Resident 8 on 9/22/2025 and was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy (a brain problem where the brain has trouble working correctly because of a chemical imbalance in the body), anemia (a condition where the body does not have enough healthy red blood cells), and acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (a medical condition where the body's tissues and cells do not get enough oxygen to function correctly).During a review of Resident 8's History and Physical (H&P) dated 10/28/2025, the H&P indicated the resident does not have the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-05 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one of five sampled residents (Resident 57) was monitored for pain. This deficient practice of not monitoring for pain had to potential for Resident 57 to have discomfort.During a review of Resident 57's admission Record ([Face Sheet] front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 57 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 57's diagnoses included conversion disorder with motor deficit (a condition where psychological distress manifests as real, physical systems affecting movement), headache (pain in the head), and encephalopathy (a general brain disorder from injury, disease toxins, or metabolic issues, causing altered brain function). During a review of Resident 57's History and Physical (H&P), dated 5/27/2025, the H&P indicated, Resident 57 did not have the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-05 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one resident (Resident 108) had a hemodialysis (HD - a treatment to cleanse the blood of wastes and extra fluids artificially through a machine when the kidneys have failed) emergency kit (e-kit) at bedside.This failure had the potential to result in a delayed emergency interventions during a life-threatening dialysis complications.Findings:During a review of Resident 108's Face Sheet (admission Record), the Face Sheet indicated the facility admitted Resident 108 on 11/26/2025 with diagnoses including acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (a medical condition where the body's tissues and cells do not get enough oxygen to function correctly), dependence on renal dialysis (a medical treatment that takes over the job of cleaning the blood when a person's kidneys stop working properly), and myocardial infarction (heart attack).During a review of Resident 108's History and Physical (H&P) dated 11/29/2025, the H&P indicated Resident 108 had the capacity to understand and make…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure three of three sampled Residents (Resident 7, Resident 48, and Resident 111) opened medication boxes and a medication bottle were labeled with the date opened.This failure had the potential to result in the use of medications past their stability period, reducing efficacy and compromising resident's health and safety.Findings:1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/3/2025 at 3:20 p.m. with the Infection Preventions Nurse (IPN), for medication cart 3 located in station 2, the following medications boxes were inside medication cart 3 without opened date labels: a. Lidocaine Patch (medication used for pain) and Albuterol Sulfate Inhalation (medication used to treat lung diseases) for Resident 48b. Lovenox injections (medication used to treat blood clots) for Resident 111During an interview on 12/3/2025 at 3:20 p.m. with IPN, the IPN stated it was important to have open date labels to know when medications expire. The IPN stated labeling medications with opened dates was important to prevent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure chocolate frosting, flour, and starch stored in the kitchen were not expired.This failure had the potential to result in unsafe food preparation practices and increased risk of residents consuming foods made with expired ingredients, leading to decreased food quality or foodborne illness.Findings:During an observation on 12/2/2025 at 8:55 a.m. in the kitchen food storage room, chocolate frosting in a plastic tub was observed with an expiry date on 11/19/2025, starch stored in a grey circular bin with lid had an expiry date on 11/24/2025, and flour in a grey circular bin with lid had an expiry date on 11/24/2025.During an interview on 12/2/2025 at 8:57 a.m. with Dietary Aid (DA) 1, DA 1 stated the chocolate frosting, starch, and flour were expired and expired foods in storage must be thrown away as it may be used for foods served to the residents. DA 1 stated the residents may get severely sick from eating foods that were made with expired ingredients.During an interview on 12/3/2025 at 12:44 p.m. with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-05 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain a television in a safe and operating condition for one of 42 resident rooms' (room [ROOM NUMBER]B), when an uncovered and unsecured cable electrical wire was hanging underneath the television and not having a system in place to timely take care of equipment repairs.This deficiency had the potential to cause injury from electrical hazards.Findings:During an observation on 12/4/2025 at 1:28 p.m. in room [ROOM NUMBER]B, a wall-mounted television had an uncovered wire hanging from the cable at the bottom of the television.During a concurrent observation, and interview on 12/5/2025 at 10:27 a.m. in room [ROOM NUMBER]B, the Housekeeping Supervisor (HS) stated the television cable wire was exposed and should not be exposed because the wires could be dangerous to the residents. During a concurrent interview and record review on 12/5/2025 at 10:35 a.m., the HS indicated the facility's Preventative Maintenance Monthly Checklist, dated 2025,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-05 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure one of five sampled residents (Resident 23) the licensed staff had turned off the oxygen when Resident 23 was not in the room and not in use. This deficient practice of not turning off the oxygen while the resident was not in the room had the potential for hazardous conditions.During a review of Resident 23's admission Record ([Face Sheet] front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 23 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 23's diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ([COPD]- a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing), respiratory failure (when the body's respiratory system is unable to exchange oxygen and carbon dioxide properly), and dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities). During a review of Resident 23's History and Physical (H&P), dated 8/13/2025,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-03 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of six sampled residents (Resident 2) had a functioning television (TV) to watch. This deficient practice resulted in not being able to watch TV clearly when she wanted to.Findings: During a review of Resident 2's Face Sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 2 was admitted on [DATE]. During a review of Resident 2's Activity assessment dated [DATE], the Activity Assessment indicated Resident 2 enjoyed music, exercise, hand massage, music programs and watching TV, and enjoyed these activities in her own room or the activities room.During a review of Resident 2's Care Plan dated 5/14/2025, the Care Plan indicated Resident 2 is interested in independent and self-directed activities and had goals to maintain interest or pleasure in doing daily activities of preference. During a review of Resident 2's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure one out of three sampled residents (Resident 1) resident rights were accommodated when Resident 1 refused a blood draw. This deficient practice of not allowing Resident 1 to refuse blood draw had the potential for the resident to feel discomfort when the staff attempted to draw the blood. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 1 diagnoses included dementia (a serious disturbance in a person's metal abilities that results in a decreased awareness of one's environment and confused thinking), anxiety (a feeling of worry, nervousness, or unease), and osteoarthritis (a degenerative joint disease, in which the tissues in the joint break down over time). During a review of Resident 1's History and Physical (H&P), dated 6/20/2024, the H&P indicated Resident 1 did not have the capacity to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-09 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide dental services when one of three residents (Resident 1) did not receive follow up care for partial dentures as requested by the resident. This failure resulted in Resident 1 feeling embarrassed and had the potential to result in the resident having difficulty chewing and eating which could lead to weight loss and aspiration (accidental inhalation of food into the lungs). Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/5/2025 at 10:20 a.m. with Resident 1, Resident 1 smiled and was observed with a large gap along the top row of the resident's teeth. Resident 1 stated, she had requested partial dentures from the facility's dentist (date unknown) and had not received them. Resident 1 stated she felt embarrassed, self-conscious to smile and talk due to her missing teeth. During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-14 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled (Resident 3) incontinence brief were changed in a timely manner. This failure had the potential for Resident 3 to develop a skin rash, infection and skin breakdown. Findings: During a review of Resident 3's admission Record (Face Sheet), the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 3 on 10/28/2024 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's Disease (a disease characterized by a progressive decline in mental abilities) and anxiety (a feeling of worry or unease). During a review of Resident 3 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS-a resident assessment tool) dated 2/07/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 3 was severely cognitively impaired(never/rarely made decisions) and was dependent( helper does all of the effort) on the staff for eating, oral hygiene, personal hygiene, toileting, bathing, upper/lower body dressing, always incontinent(no control) of bladder or bowel movements and at risk for developing a pressure ulcer injury(localized, pressure-related damage to the skin and/or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-14 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a pain management evaluation for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential to result in Resident 1 experience pain that was not controlled. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's Face Sheet, the Face Sheet indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 10/12/2022, and readmitted on [DATE]/2024 with diagnoses including unspecified dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, anxiety (a feeling of worry or unease), primary osteoarthritis(a progressive disorder of the joints, caused by a gradual loss of cartilage) of both knees, and hypertension(high blood pressure). During a review of Resident 1 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS-a resident assessment tool) dated 4/21/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 1 had moderate cognitive impairment, and was dependent( helper does all of the effort) on the staff for toileting hygiene, lower body…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, sanitary environment for one of three sampled residents (Resident 3) by not having a soap dispenser in resident ' s bathroom. This failure had the potential to result in the spread of disease and Resident 3 developing an infection. Findings: During a review of Resident 3's admission Record (Face Sheet), the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 3 on 10/28/2024 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's Disease (a disease characterized by a progressive decline in mental abilities) and anxiety (a feeling of worry or unease). During a review of Resident 3 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS-a resident assessment tool) dated 2/7/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 3 was severely cognitively impaired (never/rarely made decisions) and was dependent (helper does all of the effort) on the staff for eating, oral hygiene, personal hygiene, toileting, bathing, upper/lower body dressing, always incontinent(no episodes of continent with voiding or bowel movements) and at risk for developing a pressure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-02 · tag F0774 — isolatedHelp the resident with transportation to and from laboratory services outside of the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure transportation was arranged on 2/11/2025, for 1 of 4 residents, Resident 1, who had a follow up appointment with the Surgeon regarding the Jackson Pratt (a surgical suction drain that gently draws fluid from a wound to help recover after surgery) drain. This failure had the potential to affect the care the resident need post (after) operation, and placed the resident at risk for complications, like infections. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including encounter for surgical aftercare following surgery on the digestive system ( the organs that take in food and liquids and break them down into substances that the body can use for energy, growth, and tissue repair), left bundle branch block (blockage or disruption of electrical impulses that causes heart to beat) and acute on chronic systolic heart failure (a sudden worsening…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement infection prevention and control practices during wound care, for 3 of five sampled residents (Residents 2, 3, and 4.) This deficient practice had the potential to cause wound infections and delay wound healing process. Findings: a). During an observation on 11/12/2024 at 9:30 a.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVN) 1 in Resident 2 ' s room, LVN 1 cleaned the bedside table and applied plastic cover. LVN 1 washed hands, applied gloves and removed soiled dressing from Resident 2 ' s right heel. LVN 1 applied new pair of gloves and cleansed the right heel wound with normal saline ([NS] a cleansing solution). LVN 1 applied new pair of gloves and applied collagenase santyl ointment (wound ointment to remove damaged tissue from chronic skin ulcers) and covered the wound with gauze. LVN 1 applied vitamin A&D ointment (moisturizer to treat or prevent dry, rough) to Resident 2 ' s left heel and applied Resident 2 ' s bilateral heel…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to recheck the blood pressure, of one of three sampled residents, (Resident 1). Resident 1 had a physician ' s order of no Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (a procedure to restore normal breathing after cardiac arrest that includes the clearance of air passages to the lungs, mouth-to-mouth method of artificial respiration, and heart massage by the exertion of pressure on the chest) and had a low blood pressure reading. This failure had the potential Resident 1 ' s medical condition not monitored and get worse. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record, the admission Record indicated, Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 1 ' s diagnoses included acute (sudden) osteomyelitis (inflammation of bone or bone marrow, usually due to infection) on the right ankle and foot and end stage renal disease (a terminal illness that occurs when kidneys can no longer function properly). During a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 2), was provided a safe environment when providing wound care. This failure had the potential for Resident 2 to fall and sustain injuries. Findings: During a review of Resident 2 ' s admission Record, the admission Record indicated, Resident 2 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 2 ' s diagnoses included pressure ulcer (localized, pressure-related damage to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence) of sacral region (area relating to sacrum, [the large, triangle-shaped bone in the lower spine that forms part of the pelvis]). During a review of Resident 2 ' s History and Physical (H&P) dated 11/3/2023, the H&P indicated Resident 2 did not have the capacity (ability to) to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 2 ' s Minimum Data Set ([MDS], a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 9/6/2024,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-18 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a competency assessment skills check (a measurable pattern of knowledge, skills, abilities, behaviors, and other characteristics in performing that an individual need to perform work roles or occupational functions successfully) was performed upon hire and annually for two out of five randomly selected staff. This deficient practice had the potential for the facility to not be able to assess the skills necessary to provide nursing services while assuring resident safety and attaining or maintaining the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident within the acceptable standards of practice. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 10/17/2024 at 8:45 a.m., with the Director of Staff Development (DSD), Registered Nurse (RN 1), Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA 1), CNA 2, CNA 3, and CNA 4's employee files were reviewed. The DSD stated RN 1, CNA 1, CNA 2, CNA 3, and CNA 4 did not have an annual skills competency assessment check on file. The DSD stated a skills…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-18 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY b. During an interview with Resident 33 on 10/15/2024, at 10:18 a.m., Resident 33 stated she was a vegetarian but the facility serves her meals that include meat dishes. A review of Resident 33's diet order indicated a regular diet, no added salt (NAS), reduced concentrated sweets (RCS), jello with all meals, small portion only, salad for lunch [NAME] at patient's request. During an observation of 10/16/2024, at 12:40 p.m., Resident 33 was served a plate of food with a hamburger bun with a slice of orange cheese and a meat patty on it. During an interview on 10/16/2024, at 11:40 a.m. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 8, CNA 8 stated she was aware Resident 33 was a vegetarian. During an interview on 10/16/2024, at 4:30 pm, with the Director of Dietary Services (DDS), the DDS stated was new to the facility and had not spoken with Resident 33 about her preferences but will interview do so as well as other residents. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure titled, Nutrition Care, dated 2018,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and proper storage of items in the refrigerator when : 1. One frozen bottled water was found not labelled in the freezer. 2. Undated, opened food items were found in the refrigerator and under the food preparation counter. 3. The internal refrigerator fan which was blowing air over uncovered fresh produce had black substances on the fan blades. These deficient practices of not dating and labelling opened food, improper sanitation of equipment for food storage, and food stored in open containers without covers had the potential for harmful bacteria growth and cross-contamination (transfer of harmful bacteria from one place to another) that could lead to food -borne illness. Findings: During an observation on 10/15/2024 at 8:15 a.m., in the kitchen, the following was observed: 1. In freezer #3, a water bottle was on shelf without a label , 2. In refrigerator #1 a bag of white sliced bread loaf, no open date, no use by date 3. Under the food preparation counter, stored foods were observed: Oatmeal,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-18 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — patternConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to revise and provide an updated accurate resident census in the Facility's Assessment (a process for evaluating a facility's resident population and identifying the resources needed to provide care and services). This deficient practice had the potential to place residents at risk for delay of care and treatment services. Findings: During a review of the facility census for 10/15/2024, indicated 94 residents were residing in the facility. During a concurrent interview and record review on 10/18/2024 at 8:13 a.m., with the Administrator (ADM), the Facility's Assessment was reviewed. The ADM stated the Facility's Assessment was last updated on 9/7/2024. The ADM stated the assessment provided was an average daily census of 88 to 91 residents. The ADM stated the census recorded on the Facility Assessment did not match with the current census. The ADM stated the Facility Assessment did not match the census number and for section for Assistance with Activities of Daily Living ([ADL's] - routine tasks/activities such as bathing,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-18 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — patternImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement the antibiotic stewardship program (coordinated program that promotes the appropriate use of antibiotics by clinicians) by failing to monitor and address antibiotic (a substance used to kill bacteria or to treat infection) use for one of one sampled resident (Resident 20) who was on antibiotics for urinary tract infection [(UTI) an infection in the bladder/urinary tract] was not evaluated when the resident returned from the hospital. The failure had the potential for Resident 20 to receive an inappropriate antibiotic and develop antibiotic resistance. Findings: During a record review of Resident 20 ' s admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included UTI, sepsis (a life-threatening blood infection) and diabetes mellitus [(DM) a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing]. During a record review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Certified Nurse Assistant 5 (CNA 5) was not assigned to one out of five sampled residents (Resident 195) after the resident's family member (FM 1) filed a grievance regarding CNA 5's loud and rude behavior. This deficient practice had the potential to affect Resident 195's sense of self-worth and self-esteem. Findings: During a review of Resident 195's face sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the admission record indicated Resident 195 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The face sheet indicated Resident 195's diagnoses included displaced fracture of the upper end of the left humerus (a broken left upper arm bone), displaced fracture of the lower end of right humerus (a broken right upper portion of the elbow), displaced intertrochanteric fracture of the left femur (a broken thigh bone), and unspecified fracture of the left patella (a break in the kneecap). During a review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-18 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one out of five sampled residents (Resident 81) was notified her missing Electronic Benefit Transfer ([EBT]- to access benefits for food and cash aid) card was found. This deficient practice of not notifying Resident 81 the EBT card was found had the potential to cause distress for Resident 81. Findings: During a review of Resident 81's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 81 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 81's diagnoses included metabolic encephalopathy (a brain dysfunction caused by a chemical imbalance in the blood that affects the brain), chronic kidney disease (a condition where the kidneys do not work as well as they should), and dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities). During a review of Resident 81's History and Physical (H&P), dated 9/11/2024, the H&P indicated Resident 81 had fluctuating capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 81's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one out of five sampled residents (Resident 81) was offered an opportunity to file a grievance (a complaint) for a missing Electronic Benefit Transfer ([EBT]- to access benefits for food and cash aid) card. This deficient practice of not allowing Resident 81 to file a grievance for missing the EBT card had the potential to cause distress for Resident 81. Findings: During a review of Resident 81's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 81 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 81's diagnoses included metabolic encephalopathy (a brain dysfunction caused by a chemical imbalance in the blood that affects the brain), chronic kidney disease (a condition where the kidneys do not work as well as they should), and dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities). During a review of Resident 81's History and Physical (H&P), dated 9/11/2024, the H&P indicated Resident 81 had fluctuating capacity to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately complete the Minimum Data Set ([MDS]- a federally mandated resident assessment tool) Section A for the level II Preadmission Screening and Resident Review ([PASRR] a tool to determine if the person had or was suspected of having a mental illness or intellectual disability) condition for two out of five sampled residents (Resident 42 and 85). This deficient practice resulted in incorrect data transmitted to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and had the potential to result in inaccurate care and services for Resident 42 and 85. Cross Reference F644. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 42's admission Record (Face Sheet - front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 42 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission record indicated Resident 42's diagnoses included schizophrenia (a mental illness that is characterized by disturbances in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review ([PASRR] a tool to determine if the person had or was suspected of having a mental illness or intellectual disability) was resubmitted for two out of five sampled residents (Resident 42 and 85). This deficient practice had the potential to result in Residents 42 and 85 not receiving the necessary mental health care and services needed. Cross Reference F641. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 42's admission record (face sheet), the admission record indicated Resident 42 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission record indicated Resident 42's diagnoses included schizophrenia (a chronic mental disorder that affects how people think, feel, and behave), dementia (a group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning), osteoarthritis (a chronic degenerative joint disease that occurs when the cartilage in a joint breaks down and becomes rough) of the left shoulder,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a person-centered care plan for two of five sampled residents (Resident 83 and Resident 195) by failing to: 1. Develop a comprehensive care plan addressing Resident 83's smoking. 2. Develop a care plan after Resident 195 filing of two grievances (a wrong or hardship suffered, real or supposed, which forms legitimate grounds of complaint). These deficient practices had the potential to negatively affect the delivery of necessary care and services for Resident 83 and Resident 195. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 83's Face Sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the Face Sheet indicated, Resident 83 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 83's diagnoses included major depressive disorder (a mental health condition characterized by a depressed mood or loss of interest in activities for a prolonged period of time), anxiety disorder (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one out of six sampled residents (Resident 32) dentures were cleaned daily. This deficient practice of not cleaning Resident 32s dentures daily made Resident 32 feel frustrated. Findings: During a review of Resident 32's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 32 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and last readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 32's diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing), heart failure (a heart disorder which causes the heart to no pump the blood efficiently, sometimes resulting in leg swelling), and blindness (the inability to see or a lack of vision). During a review of Resident 32's History and Physical (H&P), dated 11/10/2023, the H&P indicated Resident 32 had fluctuating capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 32's Minimum Data Set ([MDS] a federally mandated assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-18 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a follow-up cataract (a medical condition in which the lens of the eye becomes cloudy) and glaucoma (group of eye conditions that can cause blindness and gradual loss of sight) appointment was scheduled for one of three sampled residents (Resident 85). This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 85's worsening vision that would negatively affect his quality of life. Findings: During a review of Resident 85's Face Sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 85 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 85's diagnoses included schizoaffective disorder (a mental illness that can affect thoughts, mood, and behavior), chronic kidney disease ([CKD]- a condition where the kidneys are damaged and can't filter blood properly), and dysphagia (difficulty of swallowing). During a review of Resident 85's History and Physical (H&P), dated 6/6/2024,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one out of six residents (Resident 84) had the correct low air loss (LAL) mattress (an air mattress with small holes that helps prevent pressure wounds and keeps the skin dry and cool) setting to prevent pressure ulcer development (localized injuries to the skin and soft tissue caused by prolonged pressure on the skin). This deficient practice of not having the correct LAL mattress settings had the potential for Resident 84 to develop a pressure ulcer. Findings: During a review of Resident 84's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 84 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and last readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 84's diagnoses included failure to thrive (a decline caused by chronic diseases and functional impairments which can cause weight loss, decreased appetite, poor nutrition, and inactivity), dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), and chronic obstructive pulmonary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one out of six sampled residents (Resident 32) had the correct diet texture when not wearing dentures. This deficient practice of not providing the correct diet texture had the potential for Resident 32 to not properly chew his food. Findings: During a review of Resident 32's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 32 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and last readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 32's diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing), heart failure (a heart disorder which causes the heart to no pump the blood efficiently, sometimes resulting in leg swelling), and blindness (the inability to see or a lack of vision). During a review of Resident 32's History and Physical (H&P), dated 11/10/2023, the H&P indicated Resident 32 had fluctuating capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 32's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-18 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sample resident (Resident 83) with post traumatic stress disorder ([PTSD] - a disorder in which a person has difficulty recovering after experiencing or witnessing a traumatic event) received informed trauma care ([TIC] - an intervention and approach that focuses on how trauma may affect an individual's life and his or her response to behavioral health) per their policy. This deficient practice had the potential for the staff's inability to identify possible triggers that could result in re-traumatization (the reactivation of trauma symptoms via thoughts, memories, or feelings related to the past traumatic experience) for Resident 83. Cross Reference F745. Findings: During a review of Resident 83's Face Sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the Face Sheet indicated, Resident 83 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-18 · tag F0711 — isolatedEnsure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the staff was following the physician orders for the correct oxygen settings for one out five sampled Residents (Resident 12). This deficient practice of not following the physician orders had the potential to worsen Resident 12's health. Findings: During a review of Resident 12's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 12's diagnoses included emphysema (a chronic lung disease that damages the air sacs in the lungs, making it hard to breathe), end stage renal disease (irreversible kidney failure), and heart failure (a heart disorder which causes the heart to no pump the blood efficiently, sometimes resulting in leg swelling). During a review of Resident 12's History and Physical (H&P), dated 8/17/2024, the H&P indicated Resident 12 did not have the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 12's Minimum Data Set ([MDS] a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-18 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolatedProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided with medically related social services and emotional support while grieving for one of one sampled resident (Resident 83). This deficient practice placed Resident 83 at risk for further depression (a serious mental illness that can affect how a person feels, thinks, and acts) and ineffective coping ability. Cross Reference F699 Findings: During a review of Resident 83's Face Sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 83 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 83's diagnoses included major depressive disorder (a mental health condition characterized by a depressed mood or loss of interest in activities for a prolonged period of time), anxiety disorder (a condition in which a person has excessive worry and feelings of fear, dread, and uneasiness) and mental disorder (a condition…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a pharmacy consultant (a professional responsible for reviewing each resident's medication profile monthly to identify and report changes) recommendation to consider a trial reduction of psychotropic medication (drug that affects behavior, mood, thoughts, or perception) was acknowledged and acted upon for one out of five sampled residents (Resident 83). This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 83 receiving unnecessary medication. Findings: During a review of Resident 83's Face Sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the Face Sheet indicated, Resident 83 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 83's diagnoses included major depressive disorder (a mental health condition characterized by a depressed mood or loss of interest in activities for a prolonged period of time), anxiety disorder (a condition in which a person has…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an opened multi-dose tuberculin (a sterile liquid that contains substances taken from the bacterium that causes tuberculosis and is used in the diagnosis of the disease) vial was labeled with an expiration date in the medication storage room. This deficient practice had the potential to result in a medication error and/or administering expired medication. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview, on [DATE], at 8:53 a.m., with Registered Nurse 1 (RN 1), a multidose vial of tuberculin purified protein derivative vial was observed in the refrigerator with a date of [DATE] and no expiration date. RN 1 stated the vial was just opened and was to be labelled with an expiration date. RN 1 stated the date written on the vial box also could have been confusing and taken as an expiration date instead of an open date. RN 1 stated the risk of not labeling an expiration date on a medication could result in giving expired…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the oxygen humidifier (a device that adds moisture to prevent dryness) was dated and labeled for one out of five sampled residents (Resident 12). This deficient practice of not dating and labeling the oxygen humidifier had the potential to cause respiratory infection to Resident 12. Findings: During a review of Resident 12's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 12's diagnoses included emphysema (a chronic lung disease that damages the air sacs in the lungs, making it hard to breathe), end stage renal disease (irreversible kidney failure), and heart failure (a heart disorder which causes the heart to no pump the blood efficiently, sometimes resulting in leg swelling). During a review of Resident 12's History and Physical (H&P), dated 8/17/2024, the H&P indicated Resident 12 did not have the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-24 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Care Plan for two of four sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 3) who were at risk for fall, were revised and individualized to include the level of staff assistance needed for the safe transfer and mobility (ability to move) of the residents. This deficient practice had the potential to result in unidentified nursing interventions and recurrent falls for Residents 1 and 3. Findings: a) During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including left thigh osteopenia (low bone density), bradycardia (heart beats slower than 60 beats per minute), and syncope (fainting or passing out). During a review of Resident 1 ' s Care Plan, dated 3/15/2024, the care plan indicated Resident 1 was a high risk for fall that may result to physical harm due to: history of falls and syncope. The Care Plan indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide needed assistance for one of four sampled Residents (Resident 3), who was assessed as needing partial/moderate assistance (resident could perform half of the mobility task while staff assisted with 50%) after toileting and while ambulating (walking). This failure resulted in Resident 3 sustaining a fall and placed the resident at risk for injuries and hospitalization from a fall. Findings: During a review of Resident 3 ' s admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including radiculopathy lumbar region (disease or damage of the nerve roots in the lower back), spinal stenosis (spinal canal narrows), and neuralgia (nerve pain). During a review of Resident 3 ' s History and Physical (H&P) dated 8/1/2024, the H&P indicated Resident 3 had the capacity to make medical decisions. During a review of Resident 3 ' s Fall Care Plan, dated 8/1/2024, The Care Plan Indicated Resident 3…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-16 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents (Resident 2) was free from physical abuse by Resident 1 by failing to: 1. Follow Resident 2 ' s Care Plan and physician ' s order to monitor and address episodes of aggressive and abusive behaviors. 2. Revise and individualize (tailoring to the resident) the Care Plan for Resident 2 who had a history of altercations and aggressive behaviors. 3. Ensure Residents 1 and 2 who had prior resident-to resident altercation on 7/29/2024, were separated. 4. Follow the facility ' s Policy and Procedure titled, Abuse Prevention Program which indicates the facility would protect residents from abuse. These deficient practices resulted in Resident 1 being physically abused by Resident 2 on 8/18/2024, sustained a hematoma to the forehead (collection of blood that forms outside of the blood vessel) and had the potential to other injuries including intracranial hemorrhage (bleeding within the skull) and fractures (broken bones).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record reviews, the facility failed to: 1. Follow their policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Resident Elopement (an instance of a patient or person in care leaving a care facility, or safe area independently without notifying anyone), which indicated, the facility will provide a safe environment and preventive measures for elopement. 2. Follow their policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Safety Supervision of Residents, which indicated, resident supervision is a core component of the systems approach to safety. As a result, one of three resdients, Resident 1, left the facility unsupervised. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated, Resident 1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and last readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 1's diagnoses included dementia (loss of the ability to think, remember, and reason to levels that affect daily life and activities), anxiety disorder (persistent and excessive worry that interferes with daily…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-17 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain a physician order to allow 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 1), to leave the facility on out on pass . This failure had the potential to jeoaprdize resident's safety and may result to bodily injuries. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission record indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of acute kidney failure (kidneys unable to filter waste products from blood), presence of automatic cardiac defibrillator (preprogramed device implanted in the chest to automatically detect cardiac arrest or a life-threatening irregular rhythms) and hypertension (high blood pressure). A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment and care planning tool), dated 3/5/2024 indicated Resident 1 had clear speech, ability to express ideas and wants, and understands. The MDS indicated Resident 1 was independent with eating, toileting hygiene, and personal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-27 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication was administered as ordered, for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This deficient practice had the potential to a poor healing process of Resident 1 ' s vaginal condition. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record, the admission record indicated Resident 1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including muscle weakness and urinary tract infection. During a review of Resident 1 ' s History and Physical (H/P), dated 1/17/2024, the H/P indicated Resident 1 did not have the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 1 ' s Minimum Data Set ([MDS] a standardized care assessment and care screening tool), dated 2/11/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 1 required substantial assistance for personal hygiene. During a review of Resident 1 ' s Order Summary Report (physician orders), dated 1/19/24, the physician order indicated estrace…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement its infection prevention and control policy and procedure (P&P) by failing to report the facility ' s Coronavirus ([Covid-19] a highly contagious infection caused by a virus that could easily spread from person to person) outbreak (at least one confirmed case of Covid-19 who had resided for at least 7 days in the facility) to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) District Office (DO). This deficient practice had the potential to result in a delay in the investigation by the DO and the spread of Covid-19. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission record (Face sheet), the face sheet indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including anemia (low blood iron), and alcohol abuse. During review of Resident 1 ' s history and physical (H&P) dated 10/11/2023, the H&P indicated, Resident 1 had the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 1 ' s Covid-19 Antigen Test…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow physician orders and care plan interventions by ensuring the nursing staff turned on a wheelchair pad alarm (a weight-sensitive sensor pad that is connected to a monitor unit and activates an alarm if a resident leaves the chair or the bed) to ensure its working properly and alerts staff of a potential fall for one of three sampled residents, (Resident 2). This failure had the potential to increase Resident 2 ' s risk of falling and sustaining injuries. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/3/2024 at 11:55 a.m., Resident 2 sat in a wheelchair with a wheelchair pad alarm on the back of his wheelchair. The pad alarm did not show a red flashing light indicating the pad was working. Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 assisted Resident 2 to a standing position, but the pad alarm did not sound. LVN 1 then turned the pad alarm on, and the alarm sound and red flashing light activated. LVN 1 stated the pad alarm was off and staff members would not hear the alarm if Resident 2 tried to stand…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-27 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure eight of 20 sampled residents' (Residents 18, 35, 3, 25, 41, 45, 53 and 72) medical records were updated to show documentation that advance directives (written statement of a person's wishes regarding medical treatment made to ensure those wishes were carried out should the person be unable to communicate them to a doctor) were discussed and written information provided to the residents and/or their responsible parties. This deficient practice violated the residents' and/or the responsible parties' rights to be fully informed of the option to formulate their advance directives and had the potential to cause conflict with the residents' health care wishes. Findings: A. During a review of Resident 18's Face Sheet, dated 10/26/2023, the Face Sheet indicated Resident 86 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with the diagnoses including glaucoma (a condition of increased pressure within the eyeball, causing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure the Lorazepam oral solution (a medication used to treat mental illness) was stored in one of one inspected medication rooms, (Station 1 Medication Room), and ensure the 29.5 milliliters (ml - a unit of measure for volume) of lorazepam was accounted for and was maintained for Resident 60's use. 2. Reorder Lactulose solution (a medication used to maintain regular bowel movements) for one of three residents (Resident 1), from the facility's contracted pharmacy, to ensure the medication supply was available between 6/13/2023 and 10/26/2023 and was available during the observed medication administration for Resident 1. (cross-refer F842) The deficient practice of failing to maintain accountability of Resident 60's Lorazepam oral solution increased the risk of diversion (the illegal distribution or abuse of prescription drugs or their use for purposes not intended by the prescriber) of medications, staff working in an impaired state,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-27 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the licensed staff checked the expiration date of Humalog insulin (a medication used to treat high blood sugar) before administering 36 doses between 10/14/23 and 10/25/2023 to one randomly observed resident (Resident 61.) (cross-refer F761) The deficient practice of failing to check the expiration date of insulin prior to administration increased the risk that Resident 61 could have experience medical complications such as poor blood sugar control or injection site infections which may have resulted in hospitalization and a decreased quality of life. Findings: A review of Resident 61's Face Sheet (a document containing demographic and diagnostic resident information), dated 10/26/23, indicated Resident 61 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and most recently readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus (a medical condition characterized by a loss of blood sugar control.) A review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure licensed staff did not falsify the Medication Administration Record (MAR - the record of all medications administered to a resident) by documenting the administration of lactulose (a medication used to maintain regular bowel movements) 267 times when the product was unavailable in the facility between 6/13/23 and 10/26/2023, for one of three residents observed for medication administration (Resident 1). (cross-refer F755) The deficient practice of failing to ensure the medical records accurately reflect care delivered to the resident increased the risk that Resident 1 may not have received her lactulose as ordered and may have received unnecessary dosage adjustments possibly resulting in medical complications leading to an overall diminished quality of life. Findings: A review of Resident 1's Face Sheet (a document containing demographic and diagnostic resident information), dated 10/26/23, indicated she was admitted to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-27 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assist and document grievance for missing personal clothing for one of one sampled resident (Resident 57). This deficient practice violated the resident's right to have his grievance addressed. Findings: During a review of Resident 57's Face Sheet, the Face Sheet indicated the facility originally admitted Resident 57 on 6/30/2021 and was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral infarction (damage to tissues in the brain due to a loss of oxygen to the area), mild protein calorie malnutrition (a nutritional status in which reduced availability of nutrients leads to changes in body composition and function), and epilepsy (a disorder in which nerve cell activity in the brain is disturbed causing seizures). During a review of Resident 57's History and Physical (H&P), dated 8/28/2023, the H&P, indicated Resident 57 has fluctuating capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 57's Minimum Data Set (MDS), a standardized…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-27 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS), a standardized assessment and care screening tool, for Significant Change in Status Assessment (SCSA), is a comprehensive assessment that must be completed when the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) has determined that a resident meets the significant change guidelines for either improvement or decline, was completed within the time frame for one of one sampled resident (Resident 25). This deficient practice had the potential to result inaccurate care and services due to inappropriate MDS care screening and assessment tool practices. Findings: During a review of Resident 25's Face Sheet, the Face Sheet indicated the facility originally admitted Resident 25 on 3/25/2016 and was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebrovascular disease (group of disorders of the heart and blood vessels), obstructive uropathy (a condition in which the flow of urine is blocked) and renal calculi (kidney stone). During a review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-27 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to correctly fill out the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR, a tool to determine if the person had, or was suspected of having, a mental illness, intellectual disability, or related condition) level one screening and refer one of three sampled residents (Resident 15) who had a diagnosis of schizophrenia (a serious mental illness that affects how a person thinks, feels, and behaves) to the appropriate state-designated authority for PASRR level two evaluation and determination. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 15 not receiving appropriate treatment recommendations for schizophrenia. Findings: During a record review of Resident 15's Face Sheet, dated 10/26/2023, the Face Sheet indicated, Resident 15 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of metabolic encephalopathy (a chemical imbalance in the blood that affects the brain) and schizophrenia. The MDS Coordinator…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for physical therapy (the treatment of disease, injury, or deformity by physical methods such as massage, heat treatment, and exercise rather than by drugs or surgery) and occupational therapy (a form of therapy for those recuperating from physical or mental illness that encourages rehabilitation through the performance of activities required in daily life) for one of one sampled resident (Resident 25). This deficient practice had the potential to negatively affect the delivery of care and services to Resident 25. Findings: During a review of Resident 25's Face Sheet, the Face Sheet indicated the facility originally admitted Resident 25 on 3/25/2016 and was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebrovascular disease (group of disorders of the heart and blood vessels), right hip contracture (a condition of shortening and hardening of muscles, tendons, or other tissue, often leading to deformity and rigidity of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to update and revise a comprehensive care plan to include the new physician's order for wound care treatment for one of one sampled resident (Resident 33). This deficient practice had the potential to place Resident 33 to not receive appropriate care and/or services. Findings: During a review of Resident 33's Face Sheet, the Face Sheet indicated Resident 33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including anemia (a condition in which the blood does not have enough healthy red blood cells) in chronic kidney disease (a condition in which the kidneys are damaged and cannot filter blood as well as they should), and atherosclerosis of extremities (a disease of the peripheral blood vessels that is characterized by narrowing and hardening of the arteries that supply the legs and feet) with gangrene (dead tissue caused by an infection or lack of blood flow). During a review of Resident 33's History and Physical (H&P), dated 8/4/2023, the H&P,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-27 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of six sampled residents (Resident 18), who was assessed at risk for weight loss received High Protein Nutrition (HPN) as indicated in the physician orders and nutritional assessment. This deficient practice had the potential for further weight loss to Resident 18 by not providing the HPN as ordered. Findings: During a review of Resident 18's Face Sheet, dated 10/26/2023, the Face Sheet indicated Resident 18 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses that include glaucoma (a condition of increased pressure within the eyeball, causing gradual loss of sight), legal blindness, dementia (loss of the ability to think, remember, and reason to levels that affect daily life and activities) with behavioral disturbance, and type 2 diabetes mellitus (high level of sugar in the blood). During a review of Resident 18's History and Physical (H&P), dated 4/21/2023, the H&P indicated Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-27 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to act on one recommendation from the pharmacy consultant (a professional responsible for reviewing each resident's medication profile monthly to identify and report changes) from September 2023 for routine lab works, the Complete Metabolic Panel (CMP) (a test that measures different substances in the blood, and provides important information of your body's chemical balance and how it uses food and energy), Complete Blood Count (CBC) (a blood test used to look at overall health conditions and blood disorders), lipid panel (a blood test used to monitor and screen your risk for heart disease), Hemoglobin A1c (HBA1c) (average level of blood sugar over the past two to three months) and magnesium levels (a test measuring the amount of mineral you get from foods you eat for high or low levels), in one of five sampled residents, (Resident 6). The deficient practice of failing to respond to recommendations from the consultant pharmacist had the potential to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to discard a bottle of Humalog insulin (a fast-acting medication used to treat high blood sugar) with an opened date of 9/16/23 according to the manufacturer's requirements affecting Resident 61 in one of two medication carts inspected (Station 2 Medication Cart). (cross-refer F760) The deficient practice of failing to discard opened bottle of Humalog insulin within the date recommended by manufacturer resulted in Resident 61 received 36 doses between 10/14/23 and 10/25/23 per medication administration record (MAR) (important information about someone's medication, time, date, and amount taking). Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/25/23 at 1:45 PM of Station 2 Medication Cart with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 1), the following medication was found expired: 1. One opened vial (a small container made of glass for holding liquid medications) of Humalog insulin for Resident 61 was found labeled with an open date of 9/16/23. According to manufacturer's product labeling, opened Humalog…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-27 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to document and provide education regarding the benefits and risks of immunization and administration of influenza (a contagious respiratory illness) vaccine and pneumonia ([PNA] infection of the lungs) vaccine (medication to prevent a particular disease) to residents or resident's responsible party for four of five sampled residents (Residents 13, 18, 38, and 80). This deficient practice resulted in incomplete resident's medical records. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 18's Face Sheet, dated 10/26/2023, the Face Sheet indicated Resident 18 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses that include glaucoma (a condition of increased pressure within the eyeball, causing gradual loss of sight), legal blindness, dementia (loss of the ability to think, remember, and reason to levels that affect daily life and activities) with behavioral disturbance, and type 2 diabetes mellitus (high level of sugar in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$27,356 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $9,110 — penalty dated 2026-01-14
- $18,246 — penalty dated 2025-08-18
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-02-13 for 33 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to MARINER HEALTH CARE — 17 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 3.6 | -1.6 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.9 | -1.9 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 4.2 | -1.2 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
The other 16 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.6★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRANCARE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST | 99% | since 12/21/2005 |
| MARINER HEALTH CARE INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 05/30/2007 |
| MARINER HEALTH CARE, INC. | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 12/21/2015 |
| MHC HOLDING COMPANY | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 12/21/2005 |
| MHC WEST HOLDING COMPANY | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 12/21/2005 |
| NATIONAL SENIOR CARE, INC. | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 12/21/2005 |
| GRUNSTEIN, EMILY | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/06/2019 |
| MOTEN, KIANA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/30/2024 |
| SARCAUGA, DENNIS | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/06/2025 |
| VIDAR, EVAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/01/2025 |
| INGLEWOOD OPERATING COMPANY GP LLC | Organization | GENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 12/21/2005 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 80% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055526. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.