No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Almaden Health And Rehabilitation Center

2065 Los Gatos-Almaden Road, San Jose, CA 95124 · For profit - Partnership · 77 certified beds · (408) 377-9275 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (408) 377-9275 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
No harm-level citations or fines — but 35 lower-level deficiencies on record (see below)
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (35) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • about 18% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 5 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
14910 Union Ave
Pharmacy
Walgreens1.0 mi
14100 Blossom Hill Rd · (408) 356-1152 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Safeway0.1 mi
15549 Union Ave · (408) 559-5750 · Call to confirm hours
Park
2133 Samaritan Dr · (408) 793-5510 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased4.8%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight1.9%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.9%7.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.4%1.6%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened2.1%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication10.9%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.7%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control3.7%10.2%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table7.3%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.9%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission34.1%23.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit6.3%11.2%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.312.251.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.781.571.80typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

51.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 57 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

51.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
46.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.26U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.13hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 46.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 26 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 36% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF51.6%CMS range 37.4–60.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.8%CMS range 7.3–14.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge46.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge46.1%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge50.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified97.6%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.4%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.0%CMS range 5.1–12.37.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.231.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.77
RN hours/ resident / day
0.74
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.58
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.09
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.57
RN hoursweekends
37.2%
Total nursing turnover
0.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 77 beds and averages 70.3 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.09 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.77 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.58 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.71 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.24 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.85 to 0.57 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 37% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

8
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-01-28)
15
at the previous standard inspection (2023-04-28)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

35 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 25 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-20 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sample residents (Resident 1) received medication as ordered, whentwo medications were not available at scheduled time, andOne medication was not administered after it was delivered to the facility. Those failure had the potential to compromise Resident 1's health and well-being.A review of Resident 1's medical record indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] at 11:45 p.m. with diagnoses including unspecified intracranial injury (damage to the brain resulting from external physical force, such as falls, accidents, or assaults ), nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage epilepsy (seizures), and cerebral edema(dangerous, often life-threatening brain swelling caused by fluid buildup from injury, tumors, infection, or stroke ).Review of Resident 1's Order Summary Report indicated he had a physician order, dated11/29/2025,for levetiracetam (medication used to manage epilepsy by treating various types of seizures, including…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain a safe and functional environment when: 1. The toilet in Resident 9's room was clogged; 2. Resident 9's bathroom call light was broken; and, 3. The facility's three of four shower rooms had multiple broken tiles. These failures compromised residents' safety, well-being, and access to a properly maintained living environment. Findings: 1. During an observation and concurrent interview on 1/21/25, at 2:50 p.m., in Resident 9's room, a sign near the toilet indicated it was out of order. Resident 9 stated that the toilet had been clogged for weeks and that he had reported it to the staff. The Director of Nursing (DON), who was nearby immediately reported the issue to the Maintenance Director (MD) F. 2. During an observation and concurrent interview on 1/24/25, at 3:00 p.m., the bathroom call light in Resident 9's room was observed to be broken. Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) N confirmed that the call light was not working and reported it to the maintenance staff. During an interview on 1/28/25, at 9:50…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-28 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide proper oxygen (a colorless, odorless gas) care and treatment services for four of 18 sampled residents (Residents 168, 60, 268, and 29) when: 1. Resident 168 had an oxygen concentrator (a portable device that provides oxygen) at the bedside, but there was no oxygen signage posted on the door. 2. Resident 60 had an oxygen concentrator at the bedside, but there was no oxygen signage posted on the door. 3. Resident 268 had an oxygen concentrator at bedside, but the nasal cannula had no label, and no oxygen signage posted on the door. 4. Resident 29 had an oxygen concentrator at the bedside, but there was no oxygen signage posted on the door. This deficient practice had the potential to for accidents and hazards that could pose harm to residents in the facility. Findings: 1. During an observation on 1/21/25, at 10:20 a.m., Resident 168 was lying in bed, asleep, with a nasal cannula (NC, device placed in the nostril used to deliver…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe food storage practices and sanitary conditions in the kitchen when: 1. Kitchen staff did not wear hair restraints while in the kitchen, 2. Five of seven green peppers were wrinkled and soft, one of 3 cucumbers soft, 3. Three opened spice containers and one vanilla extract bottle with expired dates, 4. Three of eight cutting boards had deep cut marks on their surface, and 5. Two of 18 cans of sliced peaches, one of 12 cans of sliced pears, one of 6 cans of fruit cocktail were dented, and one of three cans of nacho cheese sauce with expired date of 12/23/24, in the emergency food supplies. These failures had the potential to cause food contamination and spread food-borne illness to residents who received their food from the kitchen. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/21/25 at 11:50 a.m., with the Dietary Manager (DM), the DM was wearing a head covering brown in color and not covering whole hair while in the kitchen going in and out of the walk-in freezer. The DM stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were implemented when: 1. One Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) A failed to use the proper disinfectant (chemical liquid that destroys bacteria) to disinfect a shared (used for multiple residents) glucometer (blood glucose meter to measure and display the amount of sugar [glucose] in the blood) according to manufacturer's instructions and accepted professional standards for one resident; 2. One housekeeping staff failed to handle and transport dirty laundry properly; and 3. The facility staff failed to ensure proper storage of Resident 64's breathing treatment (nebulizer treatment, which involves inhaling a mist of medication through a device) mask. These failures could result in cross-contamination and the spread of infection throughout the facility. Findings: 1. During a medication pass observation on 1/22/25 at 12:13 p.m., LVN A was observed removing the glucometer (device used to measure level of glucose [sugar]) in the blood) from the drawer of the medication cart and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-28 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program to keep the facility free of cockroaches and spiders when: 1. Roach and spider carcasses were observed in the kitchen, 2. No monitor log for deep cleaning of resident rooms reported to have sighting of roaches, and 3. Facility did not follow their facility's plan of correction regarding pest control. These failures had the potential to cause health hazards and food borne illness to residents. Findings: 1. During a kitchen tour on 1/22/25 at 8:47 a.m., accompanied by Administrator (ADM) D, three traps with roach carcasses were observed on the side and under the ice machine, dated 11/17. One roach carcass was observed behind the plastic containers on one side of the kitchen wall. During a tour of the dry storage room on 1/22/25 at 9:23 a.m., with ADM D, one trap was observed with six carcasses of spiders, dated 9/17. In a concurrent interview with ADM D, ADM D confirmed the above observations and stated pest control company comes in weekly to place new traps. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-28 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide dignity and privacy to one of 18 sampled residents (Resident 52) during care when Resident 52's lower back was partially exposed to public view while seated in a shower chair in the facility's hallway. This failure compromised Resident 52's dignity. Findings: Review of Resident 52's Face Sheet (a document that contains a summary of a patient's personal and demographic information) indicated Resident 52 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including muscle wasting and atrophy (loss of muscle mass and strength), dementia (a condition that affects memory, thinking and the ability to make decisions) and psychotic disorder (a mental health condition that can cause confusion , hallucinations, or delusions.) Review of Resident 52's Minimum Data Set (MDS, assessment tool) assessment, dated 11/14/24, indicated Resident 52's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, cognition level) score was 3 (severe impairment). During an observation on 1/28/25, at 8:30 a.m., in the hallway outside Resident 52's room,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-28 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure resident's care needs were accommodated for one of six sampled residents (Resident 37) when Resident 37's call light /button (a button device used to request assistance) was not within reach to use. This failure had the potential to affect the resident's ability to request for prompt assistance and help. Findings: Review of Resident 37's Face Sheet (a document that contains a summary of a patient's personal and demographic information) indicated, Resident 37 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including Parkinsonism (a disease that include symptoms of slowness of movements, muscle rigidity, involuntary tremors/shaking and impaired balance and posture), vascular dementia (decline in mental capacity affecting daily function), and rhabdomyolysis (a breakdown of muscle tissue). Review of Resident 37's Admission's Minimum Data Set (MDS, assessment tool) assessment, dated 12/5/2024, indicated Resident 37's brief interview for mental status (BIMS, cognition level) score was 9 (moderate cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-28 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain and meet current standards of nursing practice when, the medication was not administered according to the physician's order for one of 10 residents (Resident 65). This failure could potentially result in complications of the residents' medical conditions. Findings: During medication administration observation on 1/22/25 at 10:12 a.m., Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) A prepared seven medications for Resident 65. The medications included one tablet of aspirin (blood thinner that lowers risk of blood clots) 81 mg (mg, unit of measure), one tablet of docusate sodium (stool softener) 100 mg, one tablet of clopidogrel (an antiplatelet blood-thinning medication) 75 mg, one tablet of loratadine (medication that relieves upper respiratory allergies) 10 mg, 1 tablet of losartan (medication used to lower blood pressure) 75 mg, one tablet of Tradjenta (medication used to control blood sugar levels in the blood) 5 mg and metformin (medication used to control blood sugar levels) 1000 mg. During an observation of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-25 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — pattern
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a sanitary environment was provided when: 1. The dumpster's lid for garbage was not fully closed and 2. Leftover foods and some trashes were found on the ground of facility's garbage storage area. These failures had the potential to attract rodents and pests and may put residents' health and safety at risk. Findings: During a facility tour with the Director of Maintenance (DM) on 8/28/24 at 9:21 a.m., one dumpster for garbage was observed with broken lid and not fully closed. Leftover foods (cooked rice and food scraps), two empty food boxes, one green plastic bottle, several cardboards and papers were found on the ground of the facility's garbage storage area. The DM confirmed the above observations. The DM acknowledged the garbage lid should be fully closed and all wastes on ground should have been put inside the garbage bin to prevent attracting rodents and pest coming to the garbage storage area. During an interview with the Administrator (ADM) on 8/28/24 at 2:43 p.m., the ADM acknowledged dumpster…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 25 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-25 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe environment when the screen that covers the window leading to the kitchen sink was broken. This failure had the potential for the rodents and pests to enter the kitchen and had the potential to put residents' health and safety at risk. Findings: During an observation with the Director of Maintenance (DM) on 8/28/24 at 10:02 a.m., the screen mesh that covering the window leading to kitchen sink was observed broken on the bottom part creating a small gap. The DM confirmed the observation and acknowledged the window screen should have been maintained in good repair to prevent possible entrance of pests and rodents in the kitchen and facility. Review of the facility's undated policy and procedures titled Pest Control indicated, Maintain intact screens on windows that open.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to implement infection control practices when: 1. Licensed vocational nurse B (LVN B) walked in the hallway with gloves on; 2. Housekeeper C (HKP C) wore the same gloves to wipe resident Room AA and Room BB; and 3. Certified nursing assistant D (CNA D) brought the lunch tray to Resident 2's room which was an isolation room for Coronavirus disease (COVID-19, an infectious disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus which can spread from an infected person's mouth or nose in small liquid particles when they cough, sneeze, speak, sing or breathe) and fed her in the room wearing a surgical mask. These failures had the potential to spread infection in the facility. Findings: 1. During an observation and interview on 8/14/24 at 11:55 a.m., LVN B was walking in the hallway wearing gloves on her hands. LVN B stated she came to help a resident in her room. LVN B acknowledged that she should not wear gloves in the hallway. During an interview with the director of nursing (DON,) on 8/14/24 at 12:15 p.m., she stated staff should…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-11 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control to keep the facility free of cockroaches when live cockroaches were observed in Resident 4's room even though the room was inspected and treated for roaches. This failure had the potential to result in pest transferred disease to residents. Findings: During an interview with Resident 3, on 8/14/24 at 2:40 p.m., she stated about two weeks ago she saw a cockroach on her lunch tray. Review of the facility's Crossfire Pest Rodents and Termites Report indicated Resident 4's room was inspected and treated for cockroach and rodent on 5/31/24. However, on 6/10/24, the facility's Maintenance Work Request indicated pest control spray was requested for Resident 4's room because cockroaches were seen crawling on Resident 4's bed side rails and closet. It also indicated the request was completed on 6/12/24. Review of the facility's Ecolab Customer Services Report indicated Resident 4's room was treated for cockroaches again on 7/2/24. During an observation and interview with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to treat one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) with respect and dignity when certified nursing assistant A (CNA A) did not provide privacy to Resident 1 during transporting Resident 1 from her room to the shower room. This failure had the potential to cause embarrassment for the resident. Findings: During an observation on 8/14/24 at 4 p.m., CNA A transported Resident 1 in the hallway from her room to the shower room. Resident 1 was sitting on a shower chair. The front of Resident 1 was covered with a linen sheet, but her back and her buttocks were not covered and were exposed. During a concurrent interview with CNA A, she confirmed Resident 1's back and buttocks were not covered and were exposed. CNA A stated she missed the back of Resident 1's body, and she should cover Resident 1's body before transporting her in the hallway. During an interview with the director of nursing (DON), on 8/15/24 at 1:45 p.m., she stated staff should cover the resident's body before transporting the resident in the hallway.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a comfortable, safe temperature level was maintained in the range of 71 to 81 degrees Fahrenheit (a unit of measurement of temperature) in the facility hallway, and three resident rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER], 2, and 3). This failure had the potential for the residents to have an uncomfortable environment. Findings: Review of Resident 1's face sheet (a document that gives a resident's information at a quick glance) indicated Resident 1 admitted to facility on 7/12/2023 with diagnoses right tibia fracture (a broken right lower leg bone), left femur fracture (a broken left thigh bone), congestive heart failure (a chronic condition in which the heart does not not pump blood as well as it should), asthma (a condition in which airways narrow, swell, and may produce extra mucus, which makes it difficult to breathe), and diabetes type 2 (a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar). Resident's minimum data set…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-04-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice for four of 18 sampled residents (Residents 35, 37, 23, and 172) when: 1. For Resident 35, the facility failed to change the wound dressing as ordered and failed to label the wound dressing with the initial, date, and time; 2. For Resident 37, medication was left unattended in the room; 3. Creatinine with estimated glomerular filtration rate (creatinine with eGFR, a test that measures the level of kidney function and determines the stage of kidney disease) test was not done for Resident 23 as ordered; and 4. The wound care nurse (WCN) did not provide treatment to Resident 172's sacrum wound as ordered by the physician. These failures had the potential to negatively affect the health and safety of the residents. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 35's clinical record indicated he was admitted on [DATE] and had the diagnosis of diabetes (a disease that causes high…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-04-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had an environment free from accident hazards when red sharps (objects with sharp points or edges such as needles or syringes) containers were left open, unattended, and accessible on two out of three medication carts. This failure had the potential to put residents and staff at risk for injuries from needlesticks and sharp objects. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/24/23, at 12:33 p.m., at Medication Cart 2, with registered nurse B (RN B), a red sharps container was observed sitting on top of the medication cart. The lid was open and the container was approximately 70-80% full. RN B placed a used insulin syringe and needle into the open container on top of the cart. She stated she agreed that the sharps container can be tampered with by residents who are curious, or those with dementia who might want to put their hands in or dump the contents out. RN B stated the sharps container on the side of the medication cart did not have a lid and that's why she had to use…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored and distributed and the kitchen floor was maintained in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when: 1. The resident food refrigerator was found out of the safe temperature range; 2. Multiple resident meal trays had crack, rough edges; 3. The floor below the dish machine had two broken tiles; and 4. The ice machines had rough whitish build up on parts. These failures had the potential to cause the growth of microorganisms or attract pests which could cause foodborne illness or cross contaminate food or ice (cross contamination occurs when unclean surfaces or utensils spread germs to food and could potentially cause foodborne illness) for the 68 residents eating at the facility. Findings: 1. During an observation on 4/24/23 at 8:33 a.m., the resident food refrigerator had one bag of shredded cheese inside. The two thermometers inside the refrigerator read 48 F (degrees Fahrenheit - a unit of temperature measurement) and 47 F and the cheese was 46 F.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain proper infection control practices when: 1. Resident 17's suction tubing and canister were undated; 2. The wound care nurse (WCN) placed Resident 172's urine bag on his bed and let it touching the floor, opened Resident 172's night stand with contaminated gloved hand, and asked certified nursing assistant L (CNA L) to hold the clean dressing on Resident 172's left heel wound with her contaminated gloved hand; 3. Speech therapist (ST) did not practice standard precautions; 4. CNA did not use proper personal protective equipment (PPE) for contact precautions; 5. CNA wore PPE in the hallway and disposed of a unsealed trash bag from the contact isolation room on the storage room floor. 6. Registered Nurse B (RN B) failed to disinfect the rubber stopper of a medication vial before inserting the adaptor (a device) to dilute the medication; and 7. RN B did not properly dispose of personal protective equipment (PPE, gown and gloves) in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and/or implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for three of 18 sampled residents (Resident 61, 7, and 56) when 1. For Resident 61,who could not speak English, the facility failed to develop a care plan to address the communication barriers; 2. For Resident 7, the facility failed to develop a care plan to address the management of seizures; and 3. For Resident 56, the facility failed to develop a care plan to address the management of diabetis mellitus (DM, increase blood sugar) foot. These failures had the potential to result in the residents not receiving the care and services necessary to maintain their health, safety and well-being. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 61's clinical record indicated she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interfere with doing everyday activities) and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing and taking…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-28 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide communication services to one of 18 sampled residents (Resident 28) who spoke in their non-English language. This failure had the potential for the resident not to maintain or improve her ability to carry out the activities of daily living (ADL). Findings: Review of Resident 28's clinical records indicated she was admitted on [DATE] and had diagnoses including dementia (a decline in mental capacity affecting daily function), major depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a feeling of sadness and loss of interest), and left radius fracture (broken forearm bone). During an observation and interview on 4/24/23 at 8:29 a.m., Resident 28 was trying to communicate with certified nursing assistant E (CNA E) in her non-English language, and CNA E stated she could not understand Resident 28. CNA E further stated she could only communicate with the resident through gestures and assumed the resident's needs. Review of Resident 28's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-28 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary podiatry services for one of 18 sampled residents (Resident 56) when his toenails were long enough to curl under. This failure had the potential to affect the resident's foot health and contribute to injury and/or infection. Findings: Review of Resident 56's clinical records indicated he was admitted on [DATE] and had diagnoses including hemiplegia (a symptom that involves the loss of the ability to move on one-side of body) and hemiparesis (one-sided weakness), hypertension (high blood pressure), and type 2 diabetes (high blood sugar). During an observation and interview with Resident 56 on 4/24/23 at 10 a.m., he stated that his toenails were very long, and he needed a podiatry service. Resident 56's great toenail was long and hypertrophied (excessively enlarged), and his 2nd to 5th toenails were discolored and curled under the toes. Resident 56 stated he had not seen a podiatrist since his admission. Review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-28 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide dialysis services consistent with professional standards for one of three residents (22) who received hemodialysis (medical procedure to remove fluid and waste products from the blood and to correct electrolyte, i.e. salts and mineral imbalances by using a machine and an artificial kidney) when staff and Resident 22's clinical record indicated the wrong dialysis access site; and Resident 22's dialysis communication records were missing. These failures had the potential for the resident to be inaccurately assessed and be at risk for complications. Findings: Review of Resident 22's admission Record indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including end stage renal disease and dependence on renal dialysis. During an observation and interview with Resident 22 on 4/26/23 at 1:55 p.m., indicated Resident 22's dialysis access site was on his left upper arm. Resident 22 stated that was the only dialysis site he…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-28 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to review the risks and benefits of bed rails (adjustable metal or rigid plastic bars that attach to the bed) with the resident or resident representative (RR, a person empowered to make decisions for the resident/person legally responsible and liable for a decision or an action) and obtain the physician's order and informed consent prior to the use of bed rails for one of 18 sampled residents (Resident 7). This failure had the potential to put the resident at risk for entrapment and serious injury due to not being aware of the risks and benefits of bed rails. Findings: Review of Resident 7's clinical records indicated he was admitted on [DATE] and had diagnoses including type 2 diabetes (high blood sugar), seizures (uncontrolled jerking movements of the arms and legs caused by abnormal brain activity), and depressive episodes. During the initial tour of the facility conducted on 4/24/23 at 10:18 a.m., Residents 7 had half bed rails…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-28 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement procedures to ensure safe handling of hazardous drugs (medications capable of causing serious effects); and ensure controlled medications (those with high potential for abuse and addiction) were fully accounted when: 1. Hazardous drug handling procedures were not implemented during medication pass observation for Resident 274; 2. Random controlled medication use audit for two of six sampled residents (Residents 12 and 322) did not reconcile. The medications were signed out of the controlled drugs accountability sheet (Count Sheet, an inventory sheet that keeps record of the usage of controlled medications) but not documented on the Medication Administration Records (MAR) to indicate they were given to the residents. These failures had the potential for exposing staff and residents to serious side effects from hazardous drugs including cancer and fertility problems; and misuse or diversion (the illegal distribution or abuse of prescription drugs or their use for purposes not intended by the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-28 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to request a medication regimen review (MRR) following changes in condition (worsening of an existing problem or the emergence of new signs or symptoms, such as falls or seizures) for two out of five sampled residents (Resident 48 and 59); and failed to ensure the consultant pharmacist (CP) identified potential medications contributing to falls and make recommendations to the facility for reduction or discontinuation of one of the medications during the monthly MMRs for Resident 59. This failure had the potential for medications not being optimized for best possible health outcome, and unnecessary or prolonged use of medications which could lead to medication adverse effects (such as falls) for the residents. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 59's clinical record indicated she was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including fracture of right femur (thigh), Alzheimer's disease (memory problem), brief psychotic (condition that affect the mind, where there has been some loss of contact with reality) disorder, unspecified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-28 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 18 sampled residents (Resident 33) was free from unnecessary medications when the nursing staff did not monitor for signs and symptoms of adverse effects related to the use of blood thinning medications. Resident 33 was receiving Xarelto (generic name rivaroxaban, an anti-coagulant, or blood thinning medication). This failure had the potential for side effects of this medication (such as bleeding, excessive bruising, etc.) to go undetected or recognized for timely intervention. Findings: On 4/26/23, a review of Resident 33's clinical record indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including paraplegia (the inability to voluntarily move the lower parts of the body). A review of Resident 33's hospital record's History and Physical (H&P), dated 4/8/22, indicated a medication list which included Xarelto. A review of Resident 33's clinical record indicated a physician's order, dated 11/21/22, for Xarelto (rivaroxaban)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-28 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility medication error rate did not exceed five percent or greater when observation of 34 opportunities during the medication pass resulted in two errors. The calculated medication error rate was 5.88 percent. These failures placed Residents 38 and 274 at risk for not receiving the full therapeutic effects of medications when medications were not given according to the manufacturer's specifications. Findings: 1. During a medication pass observation for Resident 38 on 4/24/23, at 7:54 a.m., registered nurse A (RN A) was observed administering six medications, which included potassium chloride (used to treat low levels of potassium) extended-release tablet, with a cup containing about 6 ounces (or 180 milliliters [ml], unit of measurement) of water. At the bedside, Resident 38 was observed taking all his medications with two sips of water or about half of the water cup. RN A did not insist on the resident taking more water with his medications. During an interview on 4/24/23, at 8:08 a.m., with RN…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper medication storage and labeling of medications in two of two medication carts inspected when: 1. Medication Cart 3 contained two (2) expired medications and one (1) test strip (thin plastic strips which measures blood sugar levels) vial opened without an open date label; 2. Medication Cart 1 contained one (1) expired medication and one (1) test strip vial opened without an open date label. The deficient practices had a potential for residents to receive unsafe and ineffective medications (reduced potency) from being used past their discard (expiration) date and not being removed from active stock. Findings: 1. On 4/24/23 at 10:36 a.m., an inspection of Medication Cart 3 with licensed vocational nurse C (LVN C) identified: a. one opened and expired Rocklatan (used to treat glaucoma) eye drop bottle, dated opened on 3/9/23; b. one opened and expired medication inhaler Trelegy Ellipta (medication for lung disease), dated opened on 3/1/23; c. one test strip (material for testing blood sugar) vial…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-28 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of six residents (Resident 51) received pneumococcal vaccinations based on the facility's policy. This failure had the potential to expose the resident to pneumococcal infections (caused by common bacteria [streptococcus pneumonia] that can affect different parts of the body). Findings: Review of Resident 51's clinical record indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 51's Pneumococcal Vaccination Consent Form dated 6/24/22 indicated, responsible party (RP, person who is accountable in making decision on behalf of the resident) consented for the pneumococcal vaccine to be given. Review of the immunization list provided by the facility, indicated Resident 51 did not have the pneumococcal vaccine. During an interview with infection preventionist (IP) on 4/26/23 at 10:44 a.m., she confirmed the pneumococcal vaccine was not followed up. The IP acknowledged the pneumococcal vaccine should have been given to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-01-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure sanitary conditions were maintained in the food and nutrition services, when: 1. There was ice-build up on the ceiling in the walk-in freezer. 2. There was no adequate amount of sanitizing solution (quat) in one of the red bucket containers. 3. The wall fan had black matter on the blades and front grill. 4. One dietary staff was not properly wearing a hair restraint. These failures had the potential to result in food borne illness among residents. Findings: 1. During an observation on 1/21/2020 at 8:15 a.m., there was ice-build up on the ceiling in the walk-in freezer. During a review of the power refrigerator invoice dated 1/21/2020, the description of work done, indicated the door heater has failed and needs to be replaced . 2. During an observation on 1/22/2020 at 2:23 p.m., the dietary staff manager (DSM) dipped the quat strip (to test the amount of solution) in the red bucket (near the hand washing sink) for 10 seconds and the strip turned orange (equals zero) . There was no adequate amount of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-24 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide safe and homelike environment for five of 18 residents when, (1) The armrests of Resident 2's wheelchair and Resident 45's bed bolster (long pillow or cushion used to suppport the body part of persons lying on bed) were ripped, and (2) Residents 39, 63 and 221's bed privacy curtains had brown stains. These failures had the potential to result for psychosocial harm should residents experience decreased sense of well-being. Findings: 1. During an observation on 1/22/2020 at 9:00 a.m., the armrests of Resident 21's wheelchair were ripped. During an interview with Resident 21 on 01/22/2020 at 9:01 a.m., she stated, It looks really bad. 2. During an observation on 1/22/2020 at 8:20 a.m., Resident 45's bed bolster on her right lower body part was ripped. During an interview with licensed vocational nurse A (LVN A) on 1/22/2020, at 8:30 a.m., LVN A stated it needs to be replaced because it might cause a skin tear to the resident. 3. During an observation on 1/21/2020 and 1/22/2020 at 1:05 p.m., Residents 39,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-01-24 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to revise the care plan (a document which provides direction for and communicates to staff the individualized care of the resident) for two of 18 sampled residents (Residents 4 and 56) when: Residents 4 and 56's fall care plans were not revised to include interdisciplinary team (IDT) recommendations made to prevent further falls. This failure had the potential to result in the repeat occurrence of falls for the residents. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 4's clinical record indicated admission to the facility on 8/10/17 with diagnoses including muscle weakness, repeated falls and dementia (decline in mental capacity affecting thinking and memory). During an observation on 1/21/2020 at 1:33 p.m., Resident 4 was sitting in a wheelchair (WC) inside her room. Resident 4 stated, I am supposed to call for help but I don't always do it when I have to go to the bathroom. Review of Resident 4's Incident/Accident Post Review: Summary of IDTs, indicated the following dates of falls and new recommendations made by the team following each…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-24 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to change the midline catheter (put into a vein by the bend in elbow or upper arm) dressing for one of two residents (Resident 18). This failure had the potential to result to intravenous (into a vein) complications. Findings: During an observation on 1/21/2020 at 12:45 p.m., Resident 18 's midline catheter site on left upper arm was covered with transparent dressing and had brown color discharge underneath. The date marked on dressing was 1/12. During an interview with LVN B on 1/21/2020 at 1:15 p.m., LVN B stated the catheter dressing change was two days past due, and was supposed to be changed by a registered nurse. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P), Dressing Change for Vascular Access Devices, dated 2011, indicated 2. Transparent semi-permeable membrane dressings are changed every 7 days and PRN.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-01-24 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to adequately provide activities for two of five sampled residents (Residents 8 and 61) to support their physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being when activities for Residents 8 and 61 were limited in number and not following the care plans. 1. Resident 8 was admitted with diagnoses which included muscle weakness, dementia, and altered mental status. Multiple observations during the survey, Resident was observed in bed. During an interview with the activities director (AD) on 1/23/2020 at 3:19 p.m., she stated she played music for Resident 8 from her phone for five minutes, which is about two songs. The AD stated she also him pictures from a showed calendar, did reality orientation (the day, month, year from the calendar), and sometimes aroma therapy with unscented lotion. The AD stated Resident 8 used to have a radio, but it fell in 12/2019 and it has not been replaced yet. The AD stated sometimes staff took him to activities to listen to music. The AD stated she stayed with him five to ten minutes per…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MARINER HEALTH CARE — 17 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 53.6+0.4 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.9+0.1 vs chain
Staffing 5 of 54.2+0.8 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.4-0.4 vs chain
The other 16 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.6★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
GC HOLDING COMPANY 2 LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST99%since 06/30/2015
GRANCARE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 11/17/2010
MARINER HEALTH CARE, INC.Organization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 11/17/2010
MHC HOLDING COMPANYOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 11/17/2010
MHC WEST HOLDING COMPANYOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 11/17/2010
NATIONAL SENIOR CARE, INC.Organization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 11/17/2010
GRUNSTEIN, EMILYIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/06/2019
GREENE, PHILLIPIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/07/2022
SARCAUGA, DENNISIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/06/2025
SHRESTHA, SEEMAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/08/2019
JAMALI, MEHRANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/03/2021
ALMADEN HOLDING COMPANY GP LLCOrganizationGENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTERESTsince 08/27/2014

CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$12.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-1.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.3M
Related-party expense18% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 73%Medicare 14%Other / private 13%

About 73% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$498per resident / day
operating cost
$15,152per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$493per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 056058. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-01-28, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next