Creekside Healthcare Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

48.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 69 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 78.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 28 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.36 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 61% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 80 beds and averages 70.3 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.13 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.85 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.55 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.74 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.29 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.93 to 1.65 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-02-23 · tag F0573 — isolated
  Let each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1), the facility failed to provide Resident 1's Responsible Party (RP) copies of requested medical records within the required timeframe when she requested Resident 1's medical records by mail on [DATE] and sent the same request with documents via fax on [DATE]. The requested medical records were not released until [DATE] after the RP got a lawyer to make the same request on her behalf.This failure resulted in a delay in obtaining Resident 1's medical records, causing RP undue concern pertaining to obtaining the requested medical records.Findings:During a record review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), undated, the AR indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on [DATE], with discharge reason: Expired.During a phone interview on [DATE] at 11:15 a.m. with the RP, RP stated there was no response from the facility regarding Resident 1's medical records request sent in [DATE]. RP stated she sent an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-08 · tag F0644 — pattern
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure three of four sampled residents (Resident 3, Resident 18, and Resident 45) Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) were screened and referred to the appropriate state mental authority for Level II PASRR evaluation and determination.(PASRR is a federal requirement to help ensure that individuals who have a mental disorder or intellectual disabilities are appropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care). This failure had the potential to prevent residents from receiving appropriate required mental health services. During a review of Resident 3's Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment screening tool used to guide care), dated 6/19/25 the MDS indicated Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD a disorder in which a person has difficulty recovering after experiencing or witnessing a terrifying event), anxiety disorder (a mental health disorder characterized by…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were observed by one of one sampled laundry staff (LS) when the LS was not wearing a gown while moving soiled linen from the soiled linen hamper in to the washer.This failure had the potential for cross contamination and spread of infections among 72 residents at the facility.During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/7/25 at 10:09 a.m. with the LS and Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 in the laundry room, the LS was observed grasping soiled linen from the hamper in to the washer only with gloved hands. The LS stated she had never used a gown or was told to use a gown when putting the dirty linen in to the machine. The LS stated wearing the gown could protect staff and other residents from the spread of infection.During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/7/25 at 10:15 a.m. with the Laundry Staff Supervisor (LSS) in the laundry room, the LS continued to move the soiled linen from the hamper in to the washer with only gloved hands. The LSS stated gown should…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-08 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide routine medications to meet the needs of one of two sampled residents (Resident 62) and ensured controlled medications (those with high potential for abuse and addiction) were accurately reconciled for two of three sampled residents (Resident 3 and 39) when:1.Resident 62's basaglar insulin (medication used to help manage blood sugar levels) and epogen (medication used to treat anemia, a condition where the blood doesn't carry enough oxygen to the rest of the body) were not available for administration. These failures resulted in Resident 62 to not receive medications as ordered by the physician.2.Resident 3 and 39's controlled drug records were documented illegibly. These failures resulted in inaccurate accountability of controlled medications and potential for misuse or diversion (illegal distribution or abuse of prescription drugs or their use for purpose not intended by the prescriber) of controlled medications.1. During a review of Resident 62's Face Sheet, printed on 8/6/25, the Face Sheet…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-05-24 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespread
  Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program for flies and gnats in three of three units designated for resident care. A dead kitten was found outside Resident 24's window for more than 22 hours. The failure to effectively treat flies and gnats and leaving the dead kitten outside Resident 24's room resulted in Resident 24 feeling ugly and grossed out and had the potential to result in infection for all residents residing at the facility. Findings: During an observation on 5/20/24 at 10:05 a.m., three flies were observed in Resident 322's room. During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/20/24 at 10:24 a.m., three flies were observed in Resident 42's room. Resident 42 stated that the facility has numerous flies and that the flies made him feel unsanitary. During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/20/24 at 11:20 a.m., in Resident 34's room, there were five flies in Resident 34's room on the overbed table, the wall, the curtain, and the ceiling. Resident 34 stated that there are flies all over and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-24 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than 5 %. During the medication pass, three medication errors were observed out of 32 opportunities for three of six residents, resulting in an error rate of 9.38%. 1. Amlodipine (medication for management of high blood pressure) for Resident 1 was unavailable and not administered as ordered. This failure had the potential to result in uncontrolled high blood pressure. 2. Semglee pen U-100 insulin (Insulin Glargine, a long acting insulin) subcutaneous injection was administered to Resident 45 without following manufacturer's recommendation. This failure had the potential to affect the insulin dose's effectiveness and the resident's blood sugar. 3. Humulin R Regular U-100 insulin (a short acting insulin) subcutaneous injection was administered to Resident 19 without following the manufacturer's recommendation. This failure had the potential to affect the insulin dose's effectiveness and the resident's blood sugar. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 1's admission…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store medications and biologicals (a class of medications which are grown and then purified from large-scale cell cultures of bacteria or yeast, or plant or animal cells) in a safe condition when the temperature in one of two medication refrigerators was out of range in accordance with Federal, State, and CDC storage and handling guidelines. This failure had the potential to compromise the integrity and effectiveness of medications and biologicals and could potentially cause harm to the resident. During a concurrent interview and observation of medication refrigerator 2 (med fridge 2) on 5/21/24 at 11:55 a.m. with RN2, in medication storage room [ROOM NUMBER], the thermometer inside med fridge 2 indicated 32 degrees (°) Fahrenheit (F). Inside med fridge 2, were two E kits (Emergency medication kits) with the same contents in each kit with a yellow sticker indicating Refrigerate. The label on the kit indicated the unopened contents…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-24 · tag F0847 — pattern
  Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, for three of three sampled residents (Resident 49, Resident 65 and Resident 68) reviewed for arbitration (a private process where disputing parties agree that one or several other individuals can make a decision about the dispute [disagreement or claim among parties where one party claims to have been harmed] after receiving evidence and hearing arguments) agreement, the facility failed to ensure the arbitration agreement was explained in a manner they understood. This failure had the potential to result in violation of the residents' right to make informed decisions and choices about important aspects of healthcare and welfare. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 49's Resident Face Sheet, the Resident Face Sheet indicated Resident 49 was re-admitted to the facility in April 2024, Resident Representative (RR) 1 was listed as Resident 49's Representative. During a review of Resident 49's Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS, a resident assessment instrument used to identify resident care problems to be addressed in an individualized care plan),…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess one of four sampled residents (Resident 322) for right forearm swelling. This failure resulted in Resident 322 experiencing pain and limited range of motion of the right arm, and placed Resident 322 at risk of untreated edema, further pain skin damage, and fluid overload. Findings: During a review of Resident 322's Face Sheet (a document used to communicate important information about a resident), undated, the record indicated Resident 322 was admitted to the facility in May 2024. During a review of Resident 322s Data Collection (a document used to collect data upon admission for a resident), dated 5/13/24, the record indicated Resident 322 had [right upper extremity] swelling present upon admission to the facility. During a concurrent observation and interview with Resident 322 on 5/20/24 at 10:05 a.m., Resident 322 stated his right arm was swollen and painful to the touch. Resident 322 was laying in bed with the head of the bed elevated, with a pillow under his head. Resident 322's right…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an environment and a safe transfer to prevent accident for one of eight sampled (Resident 2) when Resident 2 fell from the Hoyer lift during transfer from bed to chair by a Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) and a Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN). This deficient practice resulted in Resident 2 sustaining a superficial scalp laceration and hematoma due to the witnessed fall from the Hoyer lift. Findings: During a review of Resident 2's admission Record, undated, the admission Record indicated medical diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease (a type of dementia that affects memory, thinking, and behavior), dementia (a general term for memory loss and other cognitive abilities serious enough to interfere with daily life), aphasia (a language disorder caused by damage to parts of the brain that control speech and understanding of language), chronic kidney disease, sensorineural hearing loss (happens when there is damage in the inner ear), and high blood pressure. During a review of Resident 2's Minimum…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MARINER HEALTH CARE — 17 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 82% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA