No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Village Square Healthcare Center

1586 W. San Marcos Blvd, San Marcos, CA 92078 · For profit - Partnership · 118 certified beds · (760) 471-2986 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (760) 471-2986 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
No harm-level citations or fines — but 42 lower-level deficiencies on record (see below)
Insights

On the public record, this home looks stronger than most — but visit before you decide.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (42) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1582 W San Marcos Blvd · (760) 591-9975 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Vons0.3 mi
671 S Rancho Santa Fe Rd · (760) 471-0750 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Aldi0.3 mi
671 S Rancho Santa Fe Rd · (855) 955-2534 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1587 Linda Vista Dr · (760) 744-9000 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1370 W San Marcos Blvd · (619) 226-7625

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased13.1%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.1%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.3%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.3%7.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.0%1.6%3.3%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened16.9%9.8%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication19.2%13.7%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.0%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control13.6%10.2%21.2%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table9.0%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.3%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.4%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission24.4%23.0%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit11.8%11.2%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.222.251.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.131.571.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

38.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 81 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

38.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
48.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.28U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.14hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.12hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 48.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 54 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 44% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 39% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF38.6%CMS range 27.3–49.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.6%CMS range 6.9–15.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge48.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge53.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge50.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.1%CMS range 3.9–8.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.241.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.38
RN hours/ resident / day
0.98
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.74
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.10
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.31
RN hoursweekends
37.6%
Total nursing turnover
63.6%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 118 beds and averages 113.3 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.10 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.38 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.74 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.88 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.19 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.41 to 0.31 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

3
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-05-15)
11
at the previous standard inspection (2022-07-29)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

42 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 32 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide medication for Resident 1 for 3 consecutive days in 1 out of 3 residents reviewed for pain management. As a result , Resident 1 experienced distress due to not receiving the medication.Findings.An unannounced visit to the facility was conducted on 3/19/26 regarding a complaint related to a specific medication that was not administered by the facility. Per the Facility's admission Face sheet, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Other Psychoactive Substance (chemical compounds that impacts the central nervous system to alter mood, perception, cognition and behavior) Abuse and Encounter for Other Specified Surgical Aftercare. A review of the licensed nurse (LN) admitting progress notes dated 2/28/26 indicated Resident 1 was alert and oriented x4 (a medical assessment term indicating a patient is alert and fully aware of the 4 key areas : person (name) place (location),time (date & time) and situation (why…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' controlled medications (medications that can cause physical and mental dependence and are regulated by the Drug Enforcement Administration) were secured in the facility's medication carts. Specifically, controlled substances, including Individual Patient's Narcotic Records (IPNR), were removed from the cart without the licensed nurses' (LNs) knowledge and were left unaccounted for 10 of 10 residents (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10). This had the potential for affected residents' medication to not being available in the event they were needed. There were no missed doses for the affected residents.Findings:On 12/12/25, the Department received a facility report incident related to pharmaceutical services. On 1/7/26, an unannounced onsite visit to the facility was conducted. A review of the residents' record were as follows.1.Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included liver cancer, per the facility's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review , the facility failed to ensure a low air loss mattress (help prevent skin breakdown) was in placed or implemented for one of one resident (Resident 1) with a pressure ulcer (localized injury to the skin). This failure had the potential to worsen Resident 1's skin injury. Findings. Per the facility's admission Record , Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Pressure Ulcer of sacral (area of the lower back) region, unstageable and Functional Quadriplegia (paralysis affecting all limbs and torso). On 6/26/25 at 11:20 A.M., an interview with Resident 1 was conducted. Resident 1 stated she had complained to a certified nursing assistant (CNA) to checked if the settings were right on the air-loss mattress on her bed. The CNA stated there was a regular mattress on Resident 1's bed and no air-loss mattress. A record review of Resident 1's minimum data set (MDS- a federally mandated assessment tool) dated 5/31/25 indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure dietary staff covered their facial hair during meal preparation, cold food items were held on the tray line at temperature of 41 degrees Fahrenheit (F) or below, expired food items were discarded, and items in the walk-in freezer were stored in a manner to prevent freezer burn. These deficient practices had the potential to affect all residents who received food from the kitchen. Findings included: 1. A facility policy titled, Personal Hygiene dated 2018, indicated, 6. Beards and or mustaches should be covered during meal preparation and service. During an observation on 05/12/2025 at 8:55 AM, [NAME] #3 prepared fish with his facial hair uncovered. During an observation on 05/12/2025 from 11:38 AM until 11:46 AM, [NAME] #3 took the temperature of the food on the lunch tray line and plated food while their facial hair was not covered. During an observation on 05/13/2025 at 11:50 AM, [NAME] #3 served hot lunch food items and his facial hair was not covered During a concurrent observation and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide healthcare in a dignified manner when Resident #265 was left exposed during the provision of incontinence care and staff stood while they fed Resident #39. These deficient practice affected 2 (Resident #39 and Resident #265) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for dignity. Findings included: 1. An undated facility policy titled, Quality of Life - Dignity indicated, 10. Staff promote, maintain, and protect resident privacy, including bodily privacy during assistance with personal care and during treatment procedures. A Resident Face Sheet indicated the facility admitted Resident #265 on 04/22/2025. According to the Resident Face Sheet, the resident had a medical history that included a diagnosis of end stage renal disease. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date of 04/28/2025, revealed Resident #265 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated the resident had intact cognition. The MDS indicated the resident was dependent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to assess a resident for their ability to self-administer their medication for 1 (Resident #171) of 25 sampled residents. Findings included: An undated facility policy titled, Self-Administration of Medications indicated, 2. If a resident desires to participate in self-administration, the interdisciplinary team will assess the ability of the resident to participate, by completing a Resident Self Administration of Medication assessment. A Resident Face Sheet revealed the facility admitted Resident #171 on 02/22/2025. According to the Resident Face Sheet, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and pneumonia. A significant change in status Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 05/09/2025, revealed Resident #171 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated the resident had intact cognition. Resident #171's Physician Order Report for the timeframe 05/01/2025 -…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-04 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the family of a change in health status for one resident (1). As a result, it affects timely intervention and family ' s decision making to be involved in the care planning and address concern. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included metastatic prostate cancer to liver and lymph nodes (cancer cells spread to liver and lymph nodes) and deep vein thrombosis on right lower extremity (blood clot that travels and stuck in a vein), per the facility's Face Sheet. On 1/23/25, an unannounced visit to the facility was conducted in response to a complaint about an allegation that the family was not notified of the resident ' s change in condition and fall. A review of Resident 1 ' s face sheet indicated, the brother was the emergency contact and responsible party (RP). A review of Resident 1's nursing progress note, dated 1/8/25, indicated Resident 1 became unresponsive, called 911, and transferred out to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-28 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to promote dignity for one of 10 sampled residents (Resident 9) when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 was observed standing over Resident (9) while assisting in bed to eat. This deficient practice had the potential to not promote dignity and respect for Resident 9 to cause emotional distress. Findings: A review of Resident 9's admission Record indicated, Resident 9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included history of schizoaffective disorder (a mental health disorder with a mix of hallucinations and delusions). A record review of Resident 9's minimum data set (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment tool) dated 12/18/24 indicated, a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- developed by reviewing the resident's status during the prior seven-day period) score of 15 points out of 15 possible points which indicated Resident 9 did not have cognitive (pertaining to memory, judgement and reasoning ability)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-28 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the physician ' s order to infuse the intravenous fluid [IVF] (IV- plastic tube inserted in the vein to deliver hydration, medications or nutrition) within 20-hour time for one of 10 residents (Resident 2) receiving an IVF. As a result, Resident 2's IV fluid was consumed over 26 hours. In addition, the IV tubing was not labeled with date and time it was used. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 2 to experience IV related complications and infections that would impact resident's health and well-being. Findings: A review of Resident 2's admission Record indicated; Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included history of heart failure (when the heart muscle doesn't pump blood as well as it should). A record review of Resident 2's minimum data set (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment tool) dated 2/2/25 indicated, a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- developed by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the physician ' s order to infuse the intravenous fluid [IVF] (IV- plastic tube inserted in the vein to deliver hydration, medications or nutrition) within 20-hour time for one of 10 residents (Resident 2) receiving an IVF. As a result, Resident 2's IV fluid was consumed over 26 hours. In addition, the IV tubing was not labeled with date and time it was used. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 2 to experience IV related complications and infections that would impact resident's health and well-being. Findings: A review of Resident 2's admission Record indicated; Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included history of heart failure (when the heart muscle doesn't pump blood as well as it should). A record review of Resident 2's minimum data set (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment tool) dated 2/2/25 indicated, a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- developed by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 32 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0559 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a written notice and reason for the bed change was given to a roommate (Resident 6), for one of five residents (Resident 3) who required a bed change. This deficient practice had the potential to negatively affect Resident 6's rights and preferences for a new roommate from the bed change. Findings: A review of Resident 3's admission Record indicated Resident 6 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included a history of diabetes (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing). A record review of Resident 3's minimum data set (MDS - an assessment tool) dated 12/13/24 indicated, a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS - a cognitive assessment to quickly a resident's mental status and identify potential cognitive impairments with a score of 0 -15) score of 14 out of 15 (13-15 indicated intact cognitive function) indicated, Resident 3 had no cognition (pertaining to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure comfortable and home-like environment for four residents (1, 2, 3, 4) when: 1) Televisions (TV) were not functioning properly. 2) Room temperature (temp) levels were warmer (higher) than required. These failures had the potential to affect the resident ' s physical and psychosocial comfort and well-being. Findings: On 9/26/24, an unannounced visit was made to the facility. During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 9/26/24 at 10:04 A.M., the DON stated that the Director of Maintenance (DM) resigned earlier in the month. On 9/26/24 at 10:54 A.M., an observation was conducted with the Janitorial Supervisor (JS), in the second (2nd) floor nursing station. In the hallway, outside of the service elevator, were three large fans that faced into resident rooms. The JS stated that the fans were placed there to help circulate cool air into resident rooms. On 9/26/24 at 11:11 A.M., an observation was conducted with the JS, in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure nursing assessments and documentation of resident status was accurately completed for one of three residents (Resident 2), during a closed record review (record of a resident that was no longer at the facility). This failure had the potential for miscommunication of care provided to the resident, and resident harm due to incomplete and inaccurate information documented for Resident 2 ' s status and response to medical care. Findings: On 3/11/24 an unannounced visit was made to the facility in response to a complaint. On 3/11/24 at 2:20 P.M., Resident 2 ' s electronic admission Record was reviewed. Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] at 4:40 P.M., and discharged from the facility on 2/23/24 at 4:12 P.M. Health problems for Resident 2 included: pneumonia; NSTEMI (a type of heart attack); heart failure (a condition where your heart doesn ' t pump enough blood for your body ' s needs); cachexia (a state of ill health involving great…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-03 · tag F0563 — failed to protect the right to visitors — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to receive visitors of his or her choosing, at the time of his or her choosing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to allow one of two sampled residents (1) to choose their own visitors. As a result, Resident 1 was at risk of decreased social interaction. Findings: Per the facility's Resident Face Sheet, resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Per the facility's Physician Order Report, dated 10/13/23, there was an order for Resident 1 on 8/29/17 for, May visit with her friend .in family room or patio without contact supervision. Per the facility's Resident Progress Notes, on 8/20/23 Resident 1's physician documented, .Her friend (Visitor 1) comes by periodically and she welcomes his visits. There may be some resistance from staff or administration . but unless he is felt to pose some kind of threat (which I don't see), she has a right to have him visit and to hang out with him . On 10/13/23 at 10:15 A.M., an interview was conducted with Resident 1. Resident 1 stated, Visitor 1 was her friend, and she wanted him to continue visiting her. On 10/13/23 at 10:25…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-07-29 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, facility staff interview, and policy and procedure review, the facility failed to ensure the following systems were in place: 1) expired drugs were not available at the facility for administration to any of the facility's residents either in the facility's drug storage rooms, refrigerators, or in the facility's medication carts, 2) that medications and biologicals had been administered timely to all of the facility's residents, as outlined in the facility's policy and procedures, and 3) that all administered medications had been documented immediately after they had been administered to each resident. This deficiency had the potential for residents at the facility to receive expired medications and medications which had not been administered in accordance with their physician's orders. This failure could have resulted in negative outcomes for these residents. Findings include: 1) Inspection of the facility's medication storage room on Station 2, on 7/26/22 at 1:02 P.M., revealed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-29 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medication pass observation, interview with facility staff, review of the resident's clinical record, and review of the facility's policies and procedures the facility failed to ensure that 1 unsampled resident (82) had not been allowed to self-administer her medication without a physician's order to do so, and without prior approval from the facility's interdisciplinary team prior to doing so. This deficiency had the potential for this resident to administer medications to herself, in an unsafe manner, without an appropriate assessment, and without her physician's approval. Findings: During medication pass observation on 7/28/22 at 8:50 A.M., the State surveyor observed unsampled resident 82 being given her daily medications by LN 1. During the medication pass observation, the LN proceeded to pass the Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray, (this medication is indicated for the management of the nasal symptoms of seasonal and perennial allergic and nonallergic rhinitis in adults), bottle to the resident for the resident to self-administer this medication. This medication had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-29 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not assure that 1 of 4 sampled residents (2) received the necessary services for limited range of motion as designated in the care plan. As a result, Resident 2 had potential to develop further limitations in mobility. Findings: Per the facility's Resident Face Sheet, Resident 2 was admitted on [DATE] to the facility with muscle weakness and lack of coordination. Resident 2's record was reviewed. Per Resident's history and physical, dated 4/7/22, the resident had foot drop. Per Resident 2's physical therapy evaluation, dated 1/2022, the resident required maximum assist with activities of daily living. Per Resident 2's care plan, initiated 10/13/17, the resident was to be observed for changes in range of motion and referred to physical therapy for range of motion services to prevent further contractures. On 7/26/22 at 10:54 A.M. an interview and observation of Resident 2 was conducted. Resident 2 stated he could not lift his feet. Resident 2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure wound treatments were provided to 2 of 3 sampled residents (71 and 13) per the standard of practice. 1. For Resident 13, the facility failed to follow wound care orders. 2. For Resident 71, the facility failed to communicate changes to the interdisciplinary team (IDT) or physician, document wound care and wound progression, and implement an IDT to monitor the resident's wound. These failures put Resident 71 and Resident 13 at risk for delayed wound healing and infection. Findings: 1. Resident 13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cellulitis (bacterial skin infection that causes redness, swelling and pain) of right lower limb, cellulitis of left lower limb, fracture of lumbar vertebra. On 7/26/22 at 10 A.M., Resident 13 was observed sitting in his wheel chair. Compression wraps were observed on Resident 13's right and left lower extremities, his right foot was swollen. During an interview on 7/26/22 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-29 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that 1 of 21 sampled residents (83) received correct treatment for the pressure ulcer (damage to skin and underlying tissue caused by constant pressure on the area) on the left foot. As a result, Resident 83 had the potential to suffer an infection of the left foot pressure ulcer and increased tissue breakdown. Findings: Per the facility's Resident Face Sheet, Resident 83 was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of hemiparesis (weakness or the inability to move on one side of the body, making it hard to perform everyday activities like eating or dressing) of the left side. Resident 83's record was reviewed. Per Resident 83's physician orders for the month of June 2022, the resident received treatment for a pressure ulcer on the left foot. The resident was to have TerraCyte® (topical ointment that contains a powerful antibiotic tetracycline that kills bacteria) applied to the wound area after the wound was cleaned. On 7/28/22 at 8:41…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-29 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 21 sampled residents (103) on intravenous (IV) antibiotic therapy had their peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC line- to provide access to a large vein for administration of medication for long-term use) monitored per professional standards and facility policy. This failure had the potential to affect Resident 103's care and delay the identification of catheter-related complications or infections. Findings: Resident 103 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including viral meningitis (an infection of the brain lining) and extradural and subdural abscess (a pocket of pus that develops in different areas in the brain tissue) per the facility's Resident Face Sheet. During an interview with Resident 103 on 7/26/22 at 8:55 A.M., the resident stated he had been at the facility for two weeks. A transparent dressing covering an IV insertion site was observed on Resident 103's left upper arm. There was no date…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-07-29 · tag F0732 — isolated
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not ensure that the actual hours worked for RNs, LVNs and CNAs were posted. This created the potential for residents and visitors to not know the actual nursing hours provided for the resident's care. Findings: On 7/26/22 at 9 A.M., and 7/27/22 at 2 P.M., staffing hours were observed posted in the main hallway on the first floor. The staffing hours were scheduled staffing hours for RNs, LVNs, and CNAs. On 7/28/22 at 3:33 P.M., an interview and record review was conducted with the staffing coordinator (SC). The SC stated that she only posted the nursing schedules not the actual number of staff working on the floor. The SC confirmed that the staff scheduled to work often changed and actual nursing hours worked were not reflected in the posted schedules. The facility did not have a policy that specified actual direct care staffing hours were to be posted daily according to the regulation.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-07-29 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and facility staff interview the facility failed to ensure that 1 of 21 sampled residents (65), had not been put on Trazodone for a non-FDA approved indication, which resulted in this medication becoming an unnecessary drug for Resident 65, as this medication had been prescribed without an adequate (FDA approved) indication. This deficient practice resulted in this resident receiving Trazodone for a clinical indication, which had not been FDA approved, which could have caused this resident harm. Findings: Review of resident 65's clinical record on 7/28/22 at 12:36 P.M., and concurrent interview with the facility's Interim DON revealed that this resident had been put on Trazodone (DESYREL) [a medication used to treat depression] 50mg every evening on 8/30/21, for sleep. Further review of the physician's order for Trazodone, dated 8/30/21 revealed that this medication had been prescribed to treat this resident's inability to sleep, not depressive disorder for which this medication has been FDA approved. Depression is disease which can occur 24 hours a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medication room inspection, interview with facility staff, and review of the facility's policies and procedures the facility failed to ensure that the medication refrigerator on Station 2, had been secured and locked, as outlined in the facility's policies and procedures. This deficiency had the potential for medications to be stored in a manner, which created the possibility of controlled drug diversion. Findings: Inspection of the facility's Station 2 medication refrigerator on 7/26/22 at 12:58 P.M., revealed that the padlock on this refrigerator had been left unlocked. The refrigerator's open/unlocked status had been confirmed by the Interim DON, during a concurrent interview, in which this DON indicated that it was the facility's policy that this refrigerator remained locked at all times, because the refrigerator contained controlled substances such as Lorazepam (Ativan), (a schedule IV narcotic). Review of the facility's following policies and procedures confirmed the Interim DON's understanding that this medication refrigerator should have remained locked at all…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain and clean the appliances, drawers, can opener, ice scoop container, storage shelf and plate warmer in the kitchen. As a result, there was the potential for food borne illness. Findings: On 7/26/22 at 8:35 A.M., during initial tour of the kitchen, the stove was observed to have old sticky grease marks on the door, corners of the stove and sides of the oven. A strand of hair was observed embedded in old sticky grease on the door handle of the oven. Next to the stove was a stainless steel shelf where pots and pans were stored. The shelves had grease stains, dust and a strand of hair was found wrapped around one of the shelves. On 7/26/22 at 8:50 A.M., during an observation of the utensils drawer, dried food crumbs and particles were at the bottom of the drawer. A rusty, hand held can opener was also in the drawer. During an observation and interview on 7/26/22 at 8:55 A.M., with the Director of Dietary Services (DDS) and the Registered Dietician (RD), the RD stated, My expectations are the staff have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to fully implement infection control standards of practice when hand hygiene was not performed between glove changes during a wound treatment observation on 1 of 21 sampled residents (71). This failure had the potential for an increase in facility-acquired infection and medical complications for Resident 71. Findings: Resident 71 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes (a chronic condition that affects how the body uses sugar) with diabetic neuropathy (nerve damage caused by diabetes), infection of amputation stump, left lower extremity, aftercare following surgical amputation, acquired absence of right leg below the knee, colostomy (surgical opening into the colon from the abdomen), per the facility's Resident Face Sheet. According to a physician order dated 6/28/22, Resident 71 was to have her left leg amputation stump wound cleaned with wet-to-dry dressings twice daily until the wound healed. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-02-14 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care conferences (a multidisciplanary team meeting with the resident or family to evaluate care plans) were conducted timely for five of nine residents (30, 34, 64, 76 and 88) reviewed. As a result, there was a potential for changes in the resident's care needs to not be evaluated by a group of health care professionals. Findings: 1a. Resident 34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], per the facility's Resident Face Sheet. On 2/13/19 at 10:10 A.M., an interview was conducted with the MDSN. The MDSN stated resident care conferences were conducted within 7 days of admission, quarterly and when a resident experienced experienced a change in condition. On 2/13/19 at 11:10 A.M., an interview and record review of Resident 34's care conference documentation was conducted with the SSD. The SSD stated, Resident 34 did not have a care conference conducted after 9/14/18. The SSD stated Resident 34's care conference should have been conducted in December…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-02-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1. Safe water temperatures in resident bathroom sinks were maintained. 2. Adaptive equipment to call staff was provided for a paraplegic resident (88). These failures had the potential to create an unsafe environment for the residents. Findings: 1. On 2/11/19 at 8:24 A.M., an observation was conducted in room [ROOM NUMBER]. The bathroom sink water was measured at 125 degrees Fahrenheit . On 2/11/19 at 8:30 A.M., an observation was conducted in room [ROOM NUMBER]. The bathroom sink water was measured at 128 degrees Fahrenheit. On 2/11/19 at 8:52 A.M., a concurrent observation and interview was conducted in room [ROOM NUMBER]. The bathroom sink water was measured at 136 degrees Fahrenheit. Resident 5 stated, Yes, its very hot. I would burn myself if I didn't know to turn on the cold water with the hot. On 2/11/19 at 9:19 A.M., a concurrent observation and interview was conducted in room [ROOM NUMBER] with Resident 9. The bathroom…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-02-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure safe and sanitary conditions were followed regarding food safety and storage, when: 1. The ice machine bin was dirty, and 2. Three air gaps were improperly installed These failures had the potential to cause widespread foodborne illness for the 112 facility residents who consumed food from the Food and Nutrition Services Department. Findings: 1. On 2/11/19 at 8:39 A.M., during the initial kitchen tour, an observation and interview was conducted with the DDS. Three air gaps were not at the correct distance from the drainage sinks and one was propped up by a block of wood. The DDS stated she did not know about air gaps and maintenance was responsible for them. On 2/12/19 at 8:28 A.M., an observation and interview was conducted with the RMD and DDS about the kitchen air gaps. The air gap underneath the coffee machine had a small white pipe that drained directly into the drainage sink and was not at the correct height. The air gap underneath the steamer equipment was propped up by a block of wood and not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · E2019-02-14 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — pattern
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and maintain a QAPI plan for when the facility's water distribution system was not maintained in proper working order. Findings: 1. On 2/11/19 at 8:24 A.M., an observation was conducted in room [ROOM NUMBER]. The bathroom sink water was measured at 125 degrees Fahrenheit . On 2/11/19 at 8:30 A.M., an observation was conducted in room [ROOM NUMBER]. The bathroom sink water was measured at 128 degrees Fahrenheit. On 2/11/19 at 8:52 A.M., a concurrent observation and interview was conducted in room [ROOM NUMBER]. The bathroom sink water was measured at 136 degrees Fahrenheit. Resident 5 stated, Yes, its very hot. I would burn myself if I didn't know to turn on the cold water with the hot. On 2/11/19 at 9:19 A.M., a concurrent observation and interview was conducted in room [ROOM NUMBER] with Resident 9. The bathroom sink water was measured at 136 degrees Fahrenheit. Resident 9 stated, The sink water is very hot. On 2/11/19 at 9:56…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-02-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of two residents reviewed for dignity, were assisted with feeding in a respectful manner (47, 75). As a result, these failures had the potential to negatively impact Resident 47 and 75's self-esteem. Findings: 1. Resident 47 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included altered mental status (general changes in brain function) and muscle weakness, per the facility's Resident Face Sheet. On 2/12/19 at 8:38 A.M., an observation of Resident 47 was conducted. Resident 47 was sitting up in bed while CNA 31 stood beside Resident 47's bed. CNA 31 assisted Resident 47 with his meal while looking down on Resident 47. On 2/12/19 at 8:40 A.M., an interview was conducted with CNA 31. CNA 31 stated she should have sat next to Resident 47 when providing assistance with meals. CNA 31 stated standing and looking down on residents when they ate did not demonstrate respect. On 2/12/19 at 8:55 A.M., an interview with LN 24…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-02-14 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to verify informed consent was obtained for three of three residents (70, 90, 297) reviewed for the right to be informed when: 1. Resident 70 and 90 did not have verification of consent for the administration of psychotropic medications; and, 2. Resident 297 was not informed prior to the application of a WanderGuard (Trademark) (an alert system device, designed to notify staff when persons at risk attempt to leave a facility). These failures did not provide Resident 70, 90 and 297, the right to be fully informed regarding care and treatment, in order to make health care decisions. Findings: 1a. Resident 70 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included metabolic encephalopathy (abnormal brain function), per the facility's Resident Face Sheet. On 2/12/19, a review of Resident 70's medical record was conducted. Resident 70's physician's order, dated 1/9/19, indicated .escitalopram oxalate (a medication to treat major…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-02-14 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to give one of three sampled residents (900) the Advanced Beneficiary Notice (ABN/CMS 10055) (a form which gave the choice to continue services under private pay if Medicare did not provide payment), including the appeal contact information, and the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage Notice (NOMNC Form CMS 10123). As a result, Resident 900 did not have the choice to appeal the decision, or have knowledge of the costs to continue treatment in the facility. Findings: On 2/12/2019, a review of the Beneficiary notices for non-coverage was conducted. On 2/12/19, Resident 900's medical record was reviewed. Resident 900 received Medicare Part A services from 11/1/18 to 11/15/18. Resident 900 remained in the facility after termination of services until 11/16/18. On 2/13/19 at 7:17 A.M., a joint interview and record review was conducted with the SSD. The SSD stated the facility's procedure was to provide the ABN notification three days prior to Resident 900 discharge date and the NOMNC two days prior to Resident 900 discharge date . The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-02-14 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a bed hold notice to a resident transferred to a hospital for one of three closed records (94) reviewed. This failure had the potential for Resident 94 to not be aware of his right to return to the facility. Findings: On 2/14/19, a record review of Resident 94's closed medical record was conducted. A LN documented in the nursing notes Resident 94 was discharged from the facility to a hospital, on 2/5/19. The facility's Confirmation of Transfer and Bed Hold Provision was not signed by Resident 94 or his RP when transferred to the hospital. On 2/14/19 at 9:55 A.M., an interview and record review of Resident 94's medical record was conducted with the MRD. The MRD stated The Confirmation of Transfer and Bed Hold Provision section of the Bedhold Informed Consent document, had not been signed by Resident 94 or his RP when transferred. The MRD stated the Bedhold Informed Consent should have been signed. The MRD stated the importance of the Resident or RP signing the document was to ensure they were aware the bed would be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-02-14 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was initiated for three of six residents, reviewed for admission care plans. (76, 88, 30). This failure had the potential for Residents 76, 88 and 30 to not receive appropriate care. Findings: 1. Resident 76 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included encephalopathy (a disease that affects the function or structure of your brain) per the facility's Resident Face Sheet. On 2/13/19 at 1 P.M., a joint interview and record review was conducted with the MDSN. The MDSN stated no baseline care plan could be found in Resident 76's medical record. The MDSN stated it was important to initiate a care plan, so interventions could be shared with the care team. 2. Resident 88 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included quadriplegia (paralysis of all four limbs) and multiple sclerosis (a chronic disease that attacks the central nervous system) per the facility's Resident Face Sheet. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-02-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop care plans for two of five residents (297, 34) reviewed for care plan development. As a result, there was a potential for residents to not receive the care required or ordered by their physicians. Findings: 1. Resident 297 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of edema (an excessive amount of fluid in cells or tissues), per the facility's Resident Face Sheet. On 2/11/19 at 8:01 A.M., an observation of Resident 297 was conducted. Resident 297 was sitting in his bedside chair. Resident 297's lower legs and feet were swollen. On 2/11/19, a record review of Resident 297's Physician Order Report was conducted. An order was noted for furosemide (a medication used to reduce extra fluid in the body) tablet; 20 mg; oral Special Instructions; edema (swelling caused by excess fluid) Once A Day; . There was also an order noted to elevate all extremities. Resident 297's care plans were reviewed and a care plan for edema…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-02-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to transcribe admission wound treatment orders, therefore wound treatments were not performed for one of 1 residents (297) reviewed for nursing care issues. As a result, Resident 297 did not receive the care and treatment required to meet his physical needs. Resident 297 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the diagnoses of osteomyelitis of right foot (a serious infection of the bone) with right third toe amputation (removal), per the physician's History and Physical. On 2/11/19 at 8:01 AM, an observation and interview with Resident 297 was conducted. Resident 297 was sitting in a bedside chair. There was a tan colored wound dressing covering Resident 297's right toes. Resident 297 stated he had been admitted to the facility on [DATE], he had his third right toe amputated at the hospital due to an infection. Resident 297 stated the dressing on his toes had been placed in the hospital. Resident 297 stated no one had changed his…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-02-14 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen was administered and monitored per the physician's order for 3 of three residents (75, 82, 63) reviewed for oxygen administration. These failures had the potential to affect the residents health and well-being. Findings: 1a. Resident 75 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included congestive heart failure (a weakening of the heart that leads to fluid buildup in the lungs), per the facility's Resident Face Sheet. On 2/11/19 at 9:16 A.M., Resident 75 was observed in his room. Resident 75 was sitting up in bed, watching television. Resident 75 had a nasal cannula (clear tubing used to deliver oxygen) resting in his nostrils. An oxygen condenser (a machine used to deliver oxygen) was on the floor to the right of Resident 75's bed. The machine flow dial indicated Resident 75 had continuously received 3 litres of oxygen per minute, via the nasal cannula. On 2/11/19 a review of Resident 75's medical record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-02-14 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one resident (62) reviewed for dialysis (the process of removing toxins and excess fluid from the blood through a machine), care did not meet professional standards. As a result, the resident was at risk of developing undetected complications related to dialysis treatment. Resident 62 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included end stage renal disease (chronic irreversible kidney failure) and dependence on renal dialysis (a treatment to remove waste material from the kidneys) per the facility's Resident Face Sheet. Per Resident 62's physician order dated 2/12/19, After return from dialysis on M- (Monday) - W (Wednesday)-F (Friday) monitor AV shunt for bruit (auscultation of shunt for swooshing sound), thrill (lightly palpate for vibration of shunt), infection and pain . Resident 62's Dialysis Communication records were reviewed. No bruit and thrill assessment entries were documented on 1/16/19,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-02-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, two of four facility medication carts reviewed were found to have medications not stored in accordance with standard professional practices, when: 1. An opened insulin vial was not dated, and; 2. A pain cream was not labeled with the resident's name. This failure caused the potential for insulin to be expired, and the potential for pain cream to be administered to the wrong resident. Findings: On [DATE] at 10:48 A.M., a concurrent observation and interview of a third floor medication cart attended by LN 1. The cart was observed to contain Inmotion Pain Creme, a topical (to be rubbed onto the skin) pain reliever. LN 1 stated the creme was not generic, but was prescribed for Resident 67. The pain creme was observed to not have any resident's name marked on it. LN 1 confirmed it should have been marked with Resident 67's name and acknowledged the pain medication could have been inadvertently used on a different resident. On [DATE] at 11:27 A.M., a concurrent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-02-14 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — isolated
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on food and nutrition services observations, staff interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure food and nutrition services department staff appropriately carried out tasks in a safe and sanitary manner. This repeated failure to ensure effective safe and sanitary practices may place residents at nutritional risk, and in turn, further compromise the health status of 112 residents. Findings: On 2/11/19 at 10:49 A.M., an observation and interview was conducted with CK 1. CK 1 was preparing salads and tuna sandwiches. While preparing the sandwiches, CK 1 picked up a paper off the floor then proceeded to cut iceberg lettuce and slice tomatoes for the salad. CK 1 then touched the garbage can lid with same hand that was contaminated from touching the floor. CK 1 proceeded to slice the tomatoes for the salad. CK 1 then stated he did not know he should have washed his hands before beginning the cutting process. CK 1 walked over to the hand wash sink, rinsed his hands without soap for 2-4 seconds, dried his hands with a paper towel, then put gloves on and continued…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-02-14 · tag F0813 — isolated
    Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy related to food for residents brought in from outside the facility and did not ensure safe and sanitary practices. This repeated failure had the potential to result in widespread foodborne illness for 112 residents in the facility. Findings: On 2/11/19 at 3:17 P.M., an observation and interview was conducted with LN 41. LN 41 stated resident food was labeled with room numbers, dated, and kept for 72 hours. Reheated resident food was prepared in the staff lounge on 1st floor. LN 41 stated she did not know what the proper food reheating temperature was and had not received training. On 2/11/19 at 3:25 P.M., an observation and interview was conducted with LN 42. LN 42 stated resident food is labeled with name and date. LN 42 further stated resident food was reheated in the microwave, inside the employee lounge for 1-2 minutes, or depending on how the residents say they want their food reheated. LN 42 stated housekeeping checked the refrigerators for expired food items during their weekly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-02-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program when: 1. During a dining observation in the main dining room, the AD was observed assisting residents without performing hand hygiene (cleaning of the hands) in between each resident contact. 2. During a dining observation in the main dining room, the AD was observed moving between four of 11 resident's, providing assistance without performing personal hand hygiene. 3. Resident 30's urinary catheter drainage bag was lying on the floor one of 2 residents reviewed for catheter care. As a result, there was a potential for cross contamination and the spread of infection. Findings: 1. On 2/11/19 at 12:15 P.M., The AD was observed before meal service. The AD assisted residents with hand hygiene, using an individual warm cloth for each of eleven residents, without performing personal hand hygiene in between each resident contact. On 2/11/19 at 12:45 P.M., an interview was conducted with the AD.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MARINER HEALTH CARE — 17 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 53.6+0.4 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 52.9+1.1 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 54.2-1.2 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 54.4-1.4 vs chain
The other 16 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.6★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
GC HOLDING COMPANY 2 LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST99%since 10/29/2015
GRANCARE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 10/29/2015
MARINER HEALTH CARE, INC.Organization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 10/29/2015
MHC HOLDING COMPANYOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 10/29/2015
MHC WEST HOLDING COMPANYOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 10/29/2015
NATIONAL SENIOR CARE, INC.Organization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 10/29/2015
GRUNSTEIN, EMILYIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/06/2019
BHATIA, PRAKASHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/15/2024
CURREY, LARUAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/30/2024
FRANCO, JUAN CARLOSIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2024
PADILLA, PHILIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/12/2024
SARCAUGA, DENNISIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/06/2025
SAN MARCOS HOLDING COMPANY GP LLCOrganizationGENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTERESTsince 10/29/2015

CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$15.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-6.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.7M
Related-party expense11% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 76%Medicare 11%Other / private 13%

About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$384per resident / day
operating cost
$11,678per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$362per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555754. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-15, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next