Pine Ridge Care Center
45 Professional Center Pkwy, San Rafael, CA 94903 · For profit - Partnership · 101 certified beds · (415) 479-3610 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Feb 2026
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (43) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 5 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 4.1% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 1.6% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.3% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 7.3% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.3% | 1.6% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 6.1% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 3.4% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.1% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 4.7% | 10.2% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 7.9% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 26.6% | 23.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 8.5% | 11.2% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.81 | 2.25 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.32 | 1.57 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
54.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 98 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 79.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 34 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 43% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 55% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 54.0%CMS range 42.8–62.2 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 8.7%CMS range 6.1–12.5 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 79.4% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 79.4% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 82.3% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 81.4% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 96.4% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.4% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.4%CMS range 3.1–11.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.31 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 101 beds and averages 86.5 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.48 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.15 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.90 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.08 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.64 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.28 to 0.85 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 43% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
43 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 33 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from verbal abuse by another resident, when Resident 6 yelled and cursed at one of four residents sampled for abuse (Resident 7) after they became roommates on 12/10/25.This failure caused Resident 7 to be upset and angry and had the potential to negatively impact her psychosocial well-being.Findings:A review of Resident 7's admission record indicated she was last admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (a disease characterized by a progressive decline in mental abilities), unspecified dementia (progressive state of decline in mental abilities) and generalized anxiety (a mental health disorder characterized by feelings of worry, anxiety or fear that are strong enough to interfere with one's daily activities).A review of Resident 7's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 1/28/2026, indicated Resident 7 had severe cognitive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of seven sampled resident's (Resident 6) Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated resident assessment tool) accurately reflected the resident's condition when Resident 6 was assessed as having no verbal behaviors impacting other people.This failure placed Resident 6 at risk for inadequate care planning.Findings:A review of Resident 6's admission record indicated she was last admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses of anxiety disorder (a mental health disorder characterized by feelings of worry, anxiety or fear that are strong enough to interfere with one's daily activities) and depression (mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest).A review of Resident 6's MDS, dated [DATE], indicated Resident 6 had severe cognitive impairment (a decline in mental abilities such as memory, reasoning, language, and judgment). Section E of the MDS indicated Resident 6 had no verbal behavior symptoms (like…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-08 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to treat one resident (Resident 1) with respect and dignity when Resident 1's personal motorized wheelchair was taken from her after she had difficulty returning to the facility after an outing to see a movie.This failure caused the resident to lose her independence and subjected her to the discomfort of a facility wheelchair that was not appropriate for her medical conditions.Findings:A review of Resident 1's admission record indicated admission to the facility on [DATE] with relevant diagnoses of Multiple Sclerosis (MS - a disease that causes breakdown of the protective covering of nerves. MS can cause numbness, weakness, trouble walking, vision changes and other symptoms), Contractures of right and left knee (chronic loss of joint mobility caused by structural changes in non-bony tissue, including muscles and tendons), and Kyphosis (an excessive forward rounding of the upper back).A review of Resident 1's Brief Interview for Mental Status…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-05 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — widespreadEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Consulting Pharmacist conducted a monthly Medication Regimen Review (MRR- the process by which a Consultant Pharmacist reviews medication used for a patient and identifies medications that may no longer be necessary or may be more appropriate in a lower dose) for a census of 81 residents. This failure decreased the facility's potential to ensure residents were not administered unnecessary medications that can cause serious side effects or adverse consequences.Findings:During a review of the MRR facility binder on 12/4/25 at 9:21 a.m., the Consulting Pharmacist's October 2025 MRR report was not observed in the MRR.During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 12/5/25 at 11:30, a copy of the October 2025 MRR report was requested and was not received prior to the survey team exiting the facility. The DON stated she did not have a copy of the Consultant Pharmacist's October 2025 MRR because the Consultant Pharmacist was out on paternity leave during that month.On 12/10/25 the DON emailed the surveyor a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food under sanitary conditions and in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for a census of 83 when:1. One cook did not cover his beard while working around food in the kitchen;2. Prepared sandwiches were unlabeled and undated in Refrigerator 1 and an open bag of chicken breasts was unlabeled and undated in Freezer 1;3. Two seasoning containers were past their use-by dates;4. Sealed cardboard boxes labeled Mashed Potatoes, received 11/26/25, were found directly on the floor in dry storage area on 12/2/25; and5. A manual can opener had missing metal on the tip of the blade. These failures had the potential to contribute to the spread of foodborne illnesses among a vulnerable resident population.Findings:1. During the initial kitchen tour on 12/2/25 at 9:49 a.m., [NAME] 1 (CK 1) was observed in the kitchen prep area without a beard restraint or face mask. CK 1 had a full-face beard extending from ear to ear, covering half of the cheeks, jawline, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-05 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility staff failed to inform and offer written information regarding Advance Directives (AD-a legal document which specifies healthcare wishes and appoints someone to make decisions in cases of an inability to communicate with the healthcare team) to 9 residents (Residents 45, 2, 67, 76, 6, 73, 16, 53, and 84) out of a census of 83 residents when there was no documented evidence of written or verbal information was communicated to each resident regarding the formulation and execution of an AD upon admission or thereafter as legally mandated.This failure decreased the facility's potential to provide care consistent with residents' wishes should they become incapacitated.Findings:A review of Resident 45's Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST- a form which indicates residents' preferences for life sustaining treatment in the event of a medical emergency), dated [DATE], indicated Resident 45 had no AD on file.A review of Resident 45's Electronic Medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-05 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT, a group of professionals from different fields who work closely and collaboratively to coordinate care to achieve resident goals) failed to meet as a complete team to provide quarterly care conferences for four residents (Resident 5, Resident 76, Resident 67, and Resident 3) of 21 sampled residents.This failure resulted in a lack of oversight to determine whether resident goals were achieved and what revisions needed to be made to assist the residents to achieve their goals.Findings:A review of Resident 5's face sheet indicated admission to the facility on 6/20/25 with a diagnosis of Cerebral Infarction due to unspecified occlusion or stenosis of left middle cerebral artery (also known as an ischemic stroke, happens when a blood clot blocks an artery supplying the brain, cutting off oxygen and nutrients, causing brain cells to die), Unspecified dementia (a person has dementia symptoms (memory loss, confusion, personality changes), but the specific cause or type isn't clear, Hemiplegia unspecified affecting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-05 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to serve food that was palatable, attractive, and appetizing for 6 residents (Resident 51, Resident 63, Resident 70, Resident 75, Resident 89, and Resident 90) of 21 sampled residents when they complained the food was terrible and dissatisfying.This failure decreased the facility's potential to prevent unplanned weight loss and could negatively affect the health and well-being of the affected residents.Findings:During an interview on 12/2/25 at 10:50 a.m., Resident 89 stated, The food is horrible; I'm on a pureed diet. [It] Seems nutritious, but they don't tell you what you are eating. I get a green dish, a gray dish, an orange dish.During an interview on 12/2/25 at 10:57 a.m., Resident 63 complained the meat was sometimes too hard to chew.During an interview on 12/2/25 at 11:48 a.m., Resident 75 stated, [The] Food is awful.During an interview on 12/2/25 at 2:41 p.m., Resident 70 stated, [The] Food here is best described as pathetic.During an interview on 12/3/25 at 8:38 a.m., Resident 90 stated, Food was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-05 · tag F0807 — failed to offer suitable drinks — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides drinks consistent with resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain resident hydration.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide drinks consistent with resident preferences for six residents (Residents 21, 29, 33, 43, 69, and 74) of 16 sampled residents when hot beverage service was unavailable for over two weeks.This failure caused the residents to feel unhappy and dissatisfied with the dietary services provided.Findings:A review of Resident 21's admission record indicated admission to the facility on 2/7/18 and the resident was the responsible party (RP - person responsible for making decisions for the resident).A review of Resident 69's admission record indicated admission to the facility on 8/26/21 and resident was the RP.A review of Resident 29's admission record indicated admission to the facility on 7/26/22 and spouse was the RP.A review of Resident 43's admission record indicated admission to the facility on 7/29/23 and resident was the RP.A review of Resident 74's admission record indicated admission to the facility on 4/19/24 and a non-related person was the RP.A review of Resident 33's admission record indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-05 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe discharge for one resident (Resident 100) of four sampled residents when Resident 100 required assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs- routine tasks/activities such as bathing, dressing and toileting a person performs daily to care for themselves) and was discharged to an Independent Living Facility (ILF) that did not provide assistance.This failure decreased the facility's potential to ensure the Resident 100's continuity of care needs was met upon discharge into the community.Findings:A review of Resident 100's resident face sheet indicated admission to the facility on 7/18/25 with diagnoses of Sepsis (life threatening infection) and Infection and inflammatory reaction (a body's response to harmful stimuli such as infection or injury) due to an internal left hip prosthesis (an artificial implant to replace damaged hip joint).A review of Resident 100's care plan, dated 7/18/25, indicated Resident 100 wished to return to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 33 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, nursing staff failed to develop a care plan for one resident (Resident 53) when there was no care for Resident 53's use of oxygen therapy. This failure decreased the facility's potential to meet Resident 53's needs, as well as cause a decline in Resident 53's physical health and emotional well-being.Findings:A review of Resident 53's face sheet indicated admission to the facility on 8/23/25 with a diagnosis that included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD, a progressive lung condition making it hard to breathe, encompassing chronic bronchitis (inflamed airways, mucus) and emphysema (damaged air sacs), Pleural Effusion (the buildup of excess fluid in the pleural space, the area between your lungs and chest wall), and Atelectasis (the partial or complete collapse of a lung or a lobe, occurring when tiny air sacs (alveoli) deflate, preventing proper oxygen exchange.A review of Resident 53's physician order report indicated Resident 53 had an order to receive supplemental oxygen at 2-3 liters per minute (LPM) and licensed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-05 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to provide communication services to one resident (Resident 8) out of 21 sampled residents when translation services were not used to communicate with Resident 8 whose primary language was Mandarin.This failure decreased the facility's potential to prevent a decline in Resident 8's ability to perform Activities of Daily Living (ADLs- routine tasks/activities such as bathing, dressing and toileting a person performs daily to care for themselves) and a decline in ensuring Resident 8 received necessary care and services.Findings:A review of Resident 8's face sheet indicated admission to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Tubulo-Interstitial Nephritis (a type of kidney disease which involves damage to the small tubes and surrounding tissue in the kidney) and Malignant Neoplasm of the Breast (breast cancer). A further review of this face sheet indicated Resident 8's preferred language was Chinese, but no specific dialect of Chinese was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-05 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to ensure one resident (Resident 67) of 21 sampled residents was screened for a need for trauma-informed care when upon admission. This failure decreased the facility's potential to provide culturally competent care that minimized triggers or further traumatized Resident 67.Findings:A review of Resident 67's face sheet indicated admission to the facility on 2/4/25 with diagnoses of hemiplegia (complete paralysis of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness of one side of the body) following a cerebral infarction (stroke) affecting right dominant side and post-traumatic stress disorder (a mental health disorder that can develop after experiencing or witnessing a life threatening or shocking traumatic event).A review of Resident 67's care plans indicated the following:-A care plan dated 2/4/25 indicated Resident 67 had behavioral problems with verbal outbursts. Resident 67's goal for this behavior was to be diverted into a productive and meaningful activity. To reach this goal, staff were directed to remove [Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure respiratory equipment was clean and in a usable state for one resident (Resident 76) out of 21 sampled residents when the rented oxygen concentrator in Resident 76's room had visible dust and debris in the vents and needed a filter change.This failure decreased the facility's potential to prevent bacteria and debris directly enter Resident 76's lungs, placing her at risk for infection.Findings:A review of Resident 76's face sheet indicated admission to the facility on 8/30/22 with diagnoses of Community Acquired Pneumonia (a lung infection contracted outside of the facility) and Adult Failure to Thrive (a state of significant physical and functional decline in older adults).A review of Resident 76's physician orders, dated 10/28/25, indicated, Oxygen 2-4 L [liters, a unit of measure] via nasal canula [flexible device used to deliver oxygen through the nose] for saturation [the amount of oxygen carried in your blood as a percentage of the maximum it could carry] < [less than] 90%.During an observation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-08 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five sampled residents (Resident 1) was free from abuse when Resident 2 struck her on the left cheek.This failure had the potential to result in serious physical harm to Resident 1.Findings:A review of Resident 1's admission record indicated she was admitted in 5/19 with the diagnosis of cognitive impairment (persistent function deficits that can impact a person's ability to think, learn and remember).A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 8/16/25, indicated she had severe cognitive impairment.A review of Resident 1's nursing note, dated 8/13/25 and written by Licensed Nurse 1 (LN 1), indicated a staff person had reported to him she had witnessed Resident 1 being struck in the left cheek by Resident 2.A review of Resident 2's admission record indicated he was admitted in 8/20 with the diagnosis of dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities).A review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-04 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to immediately notify the responsible party (RP, a person who is designated in making decisions about health care and financial matters) for one out of two residents (Resident 1), when Resident 1's RP was not notified until 4/20/25 that Resident 1 fell on 4/18/25 and 4/19/25.This failure was a violation of residents' rights. Findings:A review of Resident 1's face sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the residents) indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in April of 2025 with a RP listed and a note that indicated, .[phone] number corrected to [xxx-xxx-1966] from [xxx-xxx-9518] on 4/20/25.A review of Resident 1's Nursing Progress note, dated 4/18/25 at 4:26 a.m., indicated, .[Resident 1] is found sitting on the floor next to his bed. [Resident 1] stated, '.I just fell on my butt.'.Called RP.no answer.A review of Resident 1's Nursing Progress, dated 4/19/24 at 4:40 p.m., indicated, . [Resident 1] was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-04 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a summary of the baseline care plan (BCP, a document created within 48 hours of a resident's admission to a nursing home, outlining the initial care needed to ensure residents' safety and well-being, focusing on basic needs and resident-specific information) was provided for one resident out of two sampled residents (Resident 1), when there was no documentation indicating Resident 1's responsible party (RP, a person who is designated in making decisions about health care and financial matters) was provided the BCP summary. This failure has the potential to decrease the RP's ability to be informed about Resident 1's care and services.Findings:A review of Resident 1's face sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the residents) indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in April of 2025 with a RP listed.A review of Resident 1's BCP, dated 4/14/25, did not indicate a copy of the summary of the BCP was provided to Resident 1's RP.During a concurrent interview and record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure one out of two sampled residents (Resident 1) was provided an environment free of accident hazards and received adequate supervision to prevent accidents, when Resident 1 fell from a wheelchair (WC) provided by the facility. This failure could result in the increased risk of accidents.Findings:A review of Resident 1s face sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the residents) indicated an admission date of 4/2025 with a diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease (AD, a disease characterized by a progressive decline in mental abilities) and Anxiety (fear, worry).A review of the Fall care plan (CP, a detailed, written document that outlines a resident's individual needs, goals, and how their care will be managed), dated 4/14/25 , did not indicate Resident 1 used a WC.A review of Resident 1's Nursing Progress Note, dated 4/14/25 at 11:00 a.m., indicated, .[Resident 1] ambulatory [walking] with cane, fall risk.Hx [history] of falls (1 fall per month) .prone to wandering behavior, 1:1 [a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report to the Department an injury of unknown source (an injury which was not observed, cannot be explained by the resident, and is suspicious because of the extent or location) for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 sustained a broken left arm. The facility was aware of Resident 1's injury on 7/6/25, but did not report it to the Department until 7/8/25.This failure resulted in a delay in the Department's investigation into Resident 1' s injury and its cause, putting Resident 1 at risk for additional harm. A review of Resident 1's Resident Face Sheet, printed 7/16/25, indicated Resident 1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease (a progressive brain disorder that gradually impairs memory, thinking, and language skills, eventually affecting a person's ability to carry out daily tasks), epilepsy (defined by recurrent seizures, which are sudden, temporary disruptions of normal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-17 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — patternProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to: 1. Ensure nursing staff were able to correctly state the facility ' s policy on how and when to perform Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR – an emergency procedure that combines chest compressions (the action of pushing hard and fast on the chest while performing CPR) and rescue breathing to restart a person ' s heartbeat and breathing) and Basic Life Support (BLS- a set of life-saving procedures performed on someone if/when their heart stops beating or the person has difficulty breathing until advanced medical help arrive) when four nursing staff (Certified Nursing Assistant A (CNA A), Licensed Nurse C (LN C), LN D, and LN G) of six nursing staff incorrectly stated the facility ' s policy; 2. Immediately perform CPR on one resident (Resident 1) of three sampled residents on [DATE] when she was found in bed not breathing and without a heartbeat; 3. Ensure an Automated External Defibrillator (AED- a portable medical device used to deliver an electric…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-17 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to meet professional standards of nursing care for one resident (Resident 1) of three sampled residents when laboratory tests were not completed per physican orders. This failure had the potential to delay treatment for Resident 1. Findings: A review of Resident 1 ' s admission record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of multiple fractures (broken bones), diabetes (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), hypokalemia (a low level of potassium (an important mineral) in the blood), hypertension (HTN-high blood pressure), and atherosclerotic heart disease (a narrowing of the vessels in the heart, causing obstruction of blood flow). A review of Resident 1 ' s progress note, dated 3/12/25 at 11:49 a.m., indicated Licensed Nurse K (LN K) documented a telephone order from the Medical Director (MD, a physician) to Test norovirus [a virus that affects the digestive tract], C.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0638 — isolatedAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interview, and document review, the facility failed to complete the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) for 2 (Resident #5 and Resident #22) of 18 sampled residents. The facility further failed to timely complete a quarterly MDS for 2 (Resident #1 and Resident #48) of 18 sampled residents. Findings included: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual dated 10/2024, indicated, The Quarterly assessment is an OBRA [Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act] non-comprehensive assessment for a resident that must be completed at least every 92 days following the previous OBRA assessment of any type. It is used to track a resident's status between comprehensive assessments to ensure critical indicators of gradual change in a resident's status are monitored. Per the User's Manual, The MDS completion date must be no later than 14 days after the ARD. 1. A Resident Face Sheet indicated the facility readmitted Resident #5 on 08/22/2024. Resident #5's medical record revealed evidence to indicate a quarterly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided a communication board and a pointer to 1 (Resident #189) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for communication. Findings included: An undated facility policy titled Alternative Communication Device revealed, The purpose of developing and training use of an alternative communication device is to provide the non-verbal resident with a means of functionally communicating his or her wants and needs. Background An alternative communication device is any system of communication used in place of or as a supplement to normal speech and language to facilitate functional communication. The system may be manual or electronic and may include the use of gestures, pictures, words, symbols, voice output, or writing A Resident Face sheet revealed the facility admitted Resident #189 on 02/22/2021. According to the Resident Face Sheet, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of cerebral infarction due to embolism of the right middle cerebral artery…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the environment of a resident did not provide a means to exit the facility without staff knowledge for 1 (Resident #13) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for accidents. Findings included: An undated facility policy titled, Resident Elopement, indicated, Purpose The facility will provide a safe environment and preventive measures for elopement with the aim to monitor and document patients at risk for elopement. A Resident Face Sheet revealed the facility admitted Resident #13 on 11/14/2023. According to the Resident Face Sheet, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of chronic pain, acute systolic heart failure, and epilepsy. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 07/11/2024, revealed Resident #13 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 6, which indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated the resident did not display wandering behavior. Resident #13's Elopement Risk Assessment dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0912 — isolatedProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents' rooms measured at least 80 square (sq) feet (ft) per resident in 7 (Rooms 26 through 29, room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], and room [ROOM NUMBER]) of 45 resident rooms in the facility. Findings included: On 12/11/2024 at 3:13 PM, the Environmental Services staff person measured the following rooms and confirmed the following dimensions: - In room [ROOM NUMBER], there was 74.96 sq ft for each resident. - In room [ROOM NUMBER], there was 74.96 sq ft for each resident. - In room [ROOM NUMBER], there was 73.92 sq ft for each resident. - In room [ROOM NUMBER], there was 74.29 sq ft for each resident. - In room [ROOM NUMBER], there was 71.31 sq ft for each resident. - In room [ROOM NUMBER], there was 73.92 sq ft for each resident. - In room [ROOM NUMBER], there was 70.19 sq ft for each resident. During an interview on 12/11/2024 at 3:43 PM, the Administrator stated was aware of the rooms that did not meet the regulatory guidance for the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based upon observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the safety of one sampled resident (Resident 1), when he was allowed to leave out on pass (physician approval to leave for a few hours at a time) without a physician ' s order and against facility policy. This failure resulted in Resident 1 purchasing alcohol, consuming three fifths of vodka and attempting to leave the facility against medical advice (without the doctors orders or a discharge plan) while intoxicated. Findings: During an interview on 5/23/24, at 3:11 a.m., Complainant D stated she was a response team member for Specialized Assist for Everyone,(SAFE) (A mobile crisis team through the city that attempted to work with marginalized people to prevent homelessness.). She stated she had responded to a police call on 5/19/24 at 7:20 p.m. for a resident who was intoxicated, uncooperative, verbally aggressive and had attempted to leave the facility against medical advice. She stated she observed Resident 1 in the parking…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-19 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse within the required timeframes when allegation was not reported to authorities within the required two hours timeframe after the facility was notified of the allegation. This failure to report allegations of abuse within the federally mandated requirement of two hours, had the potential to contribute to ongoing resident physical abuse, as well as the potential for mental and emotional harm. It also delayed the timely investigation by authorities. Findings: During review of a document titled SOC 341 (a state of California form for reporting allegations of abuse), dated 3/15/24, revealed Resident 1 reported that before lunch the CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) that was working with her put his hand on her face and around her mouth area. The report indicated the time and date of the alleged event was 3/14/24 at approximately 11:00 a.m. During a further review of SOC 341 it indicated telephone report made to law enforcement on 3/15/24 at 11:00 a.m. The form was faxed to CDPH on 3/15/24 at 1:07…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three residents (Resident 1) received care in accordance with professional standards of practice when Resident 1 had a physician's order for monthly body weights and the facility did not weight Resident 1 monthly. This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to have undetected weight loss or gain and not receive respective medical interventions. Findings: A review of Resident 1 ' s Facesheet indicated he was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with an admitting diagnosis of cerebrovascular disease (a disease that affects blood flow and blood vessels in the brain). A review of Resident 1 ' s physician orders indicated order dated 8/14/22 as follows: Monthly weights (start after weekly weights x [times] 4 is completed) A review of Resident 1 ' s weights for the period 8/15/22 to 7/2/23 indicated no weights on the months of December 2022 and February and March 2023. During an interview and record review on 7/21/23, at 10:15 a.m.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2021-08-12 · tag F0576 — widespreadEnsure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and a record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' privacy as well as residents' timely receipt of mail items when two residents (Resident 40 and Resident 19) had received opened mail, and all residents did not receive mail promptly on weekends. This failure had the potential to cause residents to feel isolated from society and disrespected by the facility. Findings: During an interview with Resident #40 on 8/2/21 at 11:22 a.m., he stated: All our mail is open, two state letters opened. Resident deliveries are left outside front door and the Administrator has to go through it. Resident 40 stated this was a violation of privacy. During an interview with Resident #40 on 8/3/21 at 11:07 a.m., he stated: I had a letter from CDPH that was opened. Last three months, I received CDPH, SS and Federal government and they were opened. Couldn't talk to the Administrator, not available. Mail is delayed if Administrator has not gone through it. I don't know why Administrator stole it. I know on July 12 packages for another Resident stored by front door. No log. We…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-08-12 · tag F0577 — patternAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to post the results of recent Federal or State surveys, including plans of correction, in an area accessible to all residents. This failure did not ensure residents' rights to access survey results for review Findings: During an observation of the three bulletin boards on 8/3/21, at 3:00 p.m., a document indicated Facility Survey Binder is available for your review and is located on the side wall of the front lobby entryway. An observation of the side wall of the front lobby entryway did not locate a binder titled Facility Survey Binder. During an interview with Staff K, on 8/3/21, at 3:10 p.m., she stated she did not know what a survey facility binder was or where it would be located. During an interview with Administrator on 8/5/21, at 2:30 p.m., in his office, he stated he keeps the survey binder in his office. The Administrator stated if residents wanted to see survey results they had to ask.
- Potential for harm · E2021-08-12 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to post grievance and complaint notices in a manner accessible to all residents, when it posted grievance and complaint notices in areas that were difficult for residents using wheelchairs to view. This failure did not ensure resident rights, and had the potential to delay the facility's identification and response to resident needs or complaints. Findings: During an interview with Resident #40 on 8/3/21 at 11:07 a.m., he stated: CDPH information is posted on board so high, you can't see it and there is always equipment parked there. During an observation in the main dining room, on 8/3/21 at 2 p.m., an upright piano was observed against the south wall, to the left of a bulletin board. On top of the piano was a tall flower arrangement and a black plastic basket, with arts and craft supplies and two puzzle boxes. Attached to the wall, behind the black plastic basket and flowers, was a frame holding a document titled Grievance & Complaints. On the front of the document holder was a document titled Facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-08-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and modify comprehensive care plans for five sampled residents (Residents 42, 45, 51, and 87) that were person-centered. These failures had the potential result in care and services that did not meet residents' needs, as well as cause a decline in residents' physical health and emotional well-being. Findings: Resident 42 During an observation and attempted interview with Resident 42, on 8/2/21, at 9:30 a.m., Resident 42 was observed laying on his back in bed in a dark room with the curtains closed and no lights on. When introduced, Resident 42 slowly lifted his head, moved his mouth but did not speak or respond. During observations on 8/2/21, at 10:00 a.m. and 11:15 a.m., and on 8/3/21 at 9:30 a.m., Resident 42 was observed laying on his back, in bed, in a dark room with the curtains closed and no lights on. Resident 42 opened his eyes and stared when asked if he would like to talk. During an observation on 8/5/21, at 8:45 a.m.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-08-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the safety of residents when: 1. Two residents (Residents 19 and Resident 79) left the facility without supervision; and 2. The facility disposed unused medications using sharps containers (a sturdy, puncture-resistant plastic container for sharp items) and placed sharps containers in an unlocked storage room. These failures had the potential to result in accidents and/or injuries to Residents 19 and 79 while alone and unsupervised, and had the potential to result in diversion of medication or resident injury arising from access to harmful medication. Findings: 1. During review of records, Nurse's Notes dated 4/20/21 at 1:00 PM indicated Licensed Nurse R was informed Resident 19 was not in his room. A search in and around the facility was conducted but the resident could not be found. Further review of Nurses' Notes dated 4/20/21 at 3:13 PM indicated the Resident went out for a walk to get fresh air and had destroyed the wander…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-08-12 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — patternProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain the usual body weight of one resident (Resident 42) as evidenced by repeated delayed assessment and follow-up by the registered dietitian and repeated delayed implementation of registered dietician's recommendations. This failure could lead to the potential for further decline for Resident 42 who was considered at nutritional risk and experiencing impaired nutrition status. Weight loss is also associated with other negative outcomes such as impaired wound healing or increased risk of death. Findings: Review of resident records indicated Resident 42 was admitted on [DATE] with unspecified dementia (general term for loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking abilities that are severe enough to interfere with daily life), major depression, mild cognitive impairment, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and history of alcoholism. Review of Registered Dietician's (RD) initial nutritional assessment dated [DATE] indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-08-12 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure attending physicians responded to the Consultant Pharmacists recommendations for Antipsychotic Medications (e.g., medication that alters brain chemistry to reduce psychotic symptoms such as harmful behaviors, hallucinations, delusions, and disordered thinking) for 10 residents (Residents 86, 62, 45, 55, 76, 59, 75, 66, 71 and 37). This failure had the potential for resident harm, including death, due to the increased risk of adverse side effects related to Antipsychotic Medication use. Findings: (Reference F758) During an observation and interview, on 8/2/21, at 9:30 a.m., Resident 62's bed was observed in the low position with a mat on the floor next to the bed. Licensed Staff Q stated the mat beside his bed was there to prevent injury if he fell out of bed. She stated Resident 62, sometimes would not call for help when he tried to get out of bed. During an observation on 8/2/21, at 12:30 p.m., Resident 45 was observed seated in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-08-12 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to initiate Gradual Dose Reductions (GDR), for 10 residents (Residents 86, 62, 45, 55, 76, 59, 75, 66, 71, and 37) on Antipsychotic Medication (e.g., medication that alters brain chemistry to reduce psychotic symptoms such as harmful behaviors, hallucinations, delusions, and disordered thinking), when the facility did not implement a GDR as recommended by the facility's pharmaceutical consultant, or document specific clinical contraindications for a GDR when a GDR was not performed. These failures had the potential to cause harmful side effects for residents receiving due to prolonged use of antipsychotic medications, including death. Findings: During an interview with Physician U, an attending physician, on 8/6/21, at 11:00 a.m., he stated he evaluated the risk-versus-benefit of GDR for residents on Antipsychotic medications and either accepted or declined the recommendation for GDR made by the consultant pharmacist. When asked, Physician U…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-08-12 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — patternProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure there was enough dietary and food nutrition staff in the kitchen to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service safely and effectively. This failure resulted to the Dietary Manager cooking dinner and breakfast for two days in the absence of a cook. Findings: During the initial tour on 8/2/21, a review of the dietary staff schedule for the day did not indicate the facility had assigned a cook to work the afternoon shift. During interview on 8/2/21 at 4:00 PM, the Dietary Manager stated the facility had been advertising for an additional cook. The Dietary Manager also stated she was cooking dinner that evening. During interview on 8/3/21 at 9:30 AM, the Dietary Manager stated the cook scheduled to prepare breakfast called off, so she prepared breakfast that morning. The Dietary Manager stated she appreciated having the cook scheduled for the afternoon shift coming in early to help with food preparation. During review of the Facility Assessment, developed 11/29/2017 and revised 3/15/21, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-08-12 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and record review, the facility failed to follow the approved menu and physician diet orders for 1 of 15 residents on puree diet (Resident 24), 1 of 2 residents on low fat low cholesterol renal diet (Resident 43), 1 of 7 residents on small portion regular diet (Resident 9), and 1 of 13 residents on low fat low cholesterol diet (Resident 93). This failure can result in undesirable changes of nutritional status, impaired healing, or poor well-being of residents in the facility. Findings: During review of the facility's menu for 8/2/21, a regular portion lunch would consist of 4 ounces of meatloaf, ½ cup garlic mashed potatoes, ½ cup spinach, and one wheat roll. During continuous tray line observation on 8/2/21 at 12:00 PM, [NAME] F prepared the following food items for the following resident plates: Resident 9 - whose tray ticket read small portions, regular should have received ¼ cup mashed potatoes and ½ wheat roll; however, the resident received a regular portion of mashed potatoes and 1 wheat roll. Resident 24 - whose tray ticket read regular pureed should…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-08-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure: 1. Kitchen staff practiced safe food handling habits to prevent contamination of food; and 2. Expired food items were disposed by expiration date. These failures could potentially result to food safety hazards, food contamination and outbreak of foodborne illness among residents of the facility. Findings: 1. During observation of the kitchen and staff on 8/2/21 at 12:20 PM, [NAME] F was observed wearing a bracelet and two rings on his right ring finger. [NAME] F washed his hands but did not remove his bracelet and rings. He proceeded to don gloves and work at tray line wearing his rings and bracelet. During observation on 8/2/21 at 12:20 PM, Dietary Aide E, was noted not to be wearing her apron while assisting the cook at tray line. During observation on 8/3/21 at 9:30 AM, Dietary Aide E was observed wearing a plastic apron while working at the washing section of the kitchen. She was removing food items from used residents' trays. During continued observation on 8/3/21 at 12:42 PM, Dietary Aide E was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-08-12 · tag F0841 — patternDesignate a physician to serve as medical director responsible for implementation of resident care policies and coordination of medical care in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure its Medical Director coordinated physician services for residents, when the Medical Director did not ensure attending physicians followed policy for Gradual Dose Reductions (GDR) and monitoring of residents on antipsychotic medications. This failure did not demonstrate appropriate physician leadership and had the potential to cause resident harm related to side effects of prolonged use of antipsychotic medications. Findings: (Refer to F756 and F758) During an interview on 8/6/21, at 11:00 a.m., Physician U stated for residents on Antipsychotic medications he evaluated the risk-versus-benefit of GDR for the antipsychotic medication prescribed, and either accepted or declined the recommendation from the pharmacist. Physician U was unable to state if he had recently approved any GDRs for his residents. Physician U stated ultimately he would be the one to decide how to treat his residents. Physician U was unable to generally describe the facility Policy and Procedure for Antipsychotic Medication Monitoring. During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-08-12 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — patternHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility's Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to identify and address quality deficiencies, when the facility's QAPI committee: 1. Had knowledge of a concern raised by its pharmaceutical consultant but the committee did not develop an action plan to correct the concern; 2. Did not prioritize known deficiencies, or establish goals for monitoring, tracking, and correcting deficiencies for Resident Care. These failures did not ensure the facility implemented QAPI system, and had the potential to negatively impact residents' quality of care and quality of life through the facility not addressing resident care issues or ensuring its provision of care was performed at the highest level and in the safest environment. Findings: (Refer to F756 and F758) Review of the QAPI meeting minutes for the months of January, February, and March of 2021 indicated a report from the facility's pharmaceutical consultant, which recommended the facility initiate Gradual Dose Reductions (GDR's) for residents on antipsychotic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-08-12 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — patternSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility's Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to develop and implement a plan of action to correct an identified quality deficiency, when the facility's QAPI committee did not develop or implement a plan of action to correct a quality deficiency concerning antipsychotic prescribing and gradual dose reductions (GDR). This failure did not comply with facility policy or ensure care to maintain the highest level of resident functioning. Findings: (Refer to F865) During an interview on 8/10/21 at 12:45 p.m., the Administrator spoke about the facility's QAPI committee. The administrator stated he wrote notes on all the reports submitted from the departments for the meeting, and placed those notes into the QAPI binder. The Administrator was asked to provide documentation for any corrective action plans on any topic, including the monitoring and evaluation of the effectiveness of the plans, but the Administrator did not respond or provide any documentation. The Administrator stated the facility's pharmacy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-08-12 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a safe and sanitary environment in the kitchen as evidence by cracked tiles on several areas in the kitchen floor. This failure could cause trips and falls among the kitchen staff and cause dirt to build up on the floor attracting cockroaches and rodents. Findings: During an observation in the kitchen on 8/3/21, at 11:07 AM, cracked tiles were noted on several areas of the kitchen floor. During interview on 8/5/21, at 10:41 AM, the Dietary Manager stated that she had spoken to maintenance the previous week the need to replace the cracked tiles in the kitchen. The Dietary Manager stated there is no time frame, but she plans to follow-up with maintenance to address the problem as soon as possible. Review of the Food Code 2017 indicated: It is the standard of practice to ensure materials for indoor floor, wall, and ceiling surfaces under conditions of normal use shall be: smooth, durable, and easily cleanable for areas where food establishment operations are conducted.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to MARINER HEALTH CARE — 17 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 5 of 5 | 3.6 | +1.4 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
| Staffing | 5 of 5 | 4.2 | +0.8 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
The other 16 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.6★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GC HOLDING COMPANY 3, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST | 99% | since 08/01/2022 |
| GRANCARE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 12/21/2005 |
| MARINER HEALTH CARE, INC. | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 12/21/2015 |
| MHC HOLDING COMPANY | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 12/21/2005 |
| MHC WEST HOLDING COMPANY | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 12/21/2005 |
| NATIONAL SENIOR CARE, INC. | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 12/21/2005 |
| GRUNSTEIN, EMILY | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 02/06/2019 |
| CAPITAL FUNDING GROUP, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST | — | since 11/01/2021 |
| MELIJOY, ADAN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/27/2012 |
| MONROE, MICHAEL | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/24/2022 |
| SARCAUGA, DENNIS | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/06/2025 |
| SERRANO, NOEL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/01/2021 |
| SAN RAFAEL OPERATING COMPANY GP, LLC | Organization | GENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 12/21/2005 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 21 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 77% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.5M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055850. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.